Spins, Bankroll and Winrate?

[MumboJumbo]

For Steve.
How many spins + bankroll + winrate we need before proclaim holy grail? Can you explain a little bit, thanks ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪

[Steve]

If you test a system on RX or similar software for say 1,000 spins, and use auto spin for 1,000 spins, keep watching the bankroll after the 1,000 spins. Sometimes you'll be up on the previous bankroll, and sometimes down. But on average, you'll be slightly down. This shows that over 1,000 spins, the results are extremely volatile and not enough for a proper test.

Next try the same thing with 10,000 spins. The volatility is significantly less, but still you can be up on the previous total perhaps 1 in 20 tests. Does it mean the system works? No, it just means that if 20 people all used the same system on different spins, on average around 1 in 20 will have profited.

There are always winners and losers. But mostly losers. And thats reflected in the game.

To answer your question, I wouldnt get too excited unless there has been wins with consistent sized bets over at least 20,000 spins. And by consistent sized bets, I mean not $1 on some spins, then $1000 on other spins. Otherwise you could get lucky on the spins with high bets, but it wouldnt reflect the accuracy of the system.

Believe me I would love there to be a HG. I believe it can exist, but it wont be done using approaches that are already proven to lose. The attack needs to be on the mechanism that determines the winning number (ie roulette wheel and physics). If it were rng, then the attack would be on the rng. In either case, increasing accuracy of predictions.

[Rplayer7]

Right now the leaderboard does not allow to accurately determine the gap from the leading players. The figures in the table cannot be used to calculate lag or lead with other players. How and with what methods is calculated the player's position in the table, the players unfortunately do not have detailed information. Propose to the organizers of the game to add new numerical characteristic of the position of the player on the leaderboard, so it was possible to accurately determine the advance or the lag from the other player.