• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

PROMISED CONSTANT WINNING BET

Started by F_LAT_INO, Jun 25, 03:19 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

F_LAT_INO

Gents,
As have promised in other thread will post a method that
never or very rarely lose a session--1 in 30--
Its all explained in attached excel.
Good luck.
BTW-this method have a real reason why it wins
but that will live to your observance.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

VLS

Thanks for sharing your bet with us :thumbsup:
🡆 ROULETTEIDEAS․COM, home of the RIBOT FREE software bot, with GIFTED modules for the community! ✔️

Boo_Ray

Thanks
but it is preaty hard to track.. specialy if you are time limited

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: Boo_Ray on Jun 25, 04:15 PM 2010
Thanks
but it is preaty hard to track.. specialy if you are time limited
After tracking all 9 sectors,after is very
easy---when you memorise 9 sectors-/like a wheel lay out/
just bet only on 4 furthest  crossings that are covering
-touching all columns and dozens.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

iggiv

either  i don't get something or the progression is losing. if we bet 16 numbers or 8 splits, we can not bet it

8
8
16
16
24
24
32
32
40
40


unless we are ready to lose money.

am i right or wrong?

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: iggiv on Jun 25, 05:26 PM 2010
either  I don't get something or the progression is losing. if we bet 16 numbers or 8 splits, we can not bet it

8
8
16
16
24
24
32
32
40
40


unless we are ready to lose money.

am I right or wrong?

You are very wrong--what else to say, except try it and you will find out.

You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

weddings

Explain more please (to avoid confusions).
-----

sherminator

Thank you very much for putting in all the effort and sharing with us F LAT INO.

It looks promising and I am going to do some testing with it. 

regards

sherminator

sherminator

Just to make sure that I understand, it looks like you are waiting for all 9 sectors to appear.
Then once all the 9 sectors appear, you are betting the 4 that are furthest away.

So for example, if you see sectors. . .

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Then the 4 furthest sectors are 1,2,3,4.

One of the qualifications for playing this method however is that the 4 furthest sectors must include all dozens and columns.

So in this case, sector 1 covers dozen 1 and column 1.
sector 2 covers dozen 1 and column 2.
sector 3 covers dozen 1 and column 3.
sector 4 covers dozen 2 and column 1.

So as you can see, the 4 furthest back sectors cover all dozens and columns (1,2,3)

If I am wrong, then I have just made a fool of myself, lol.

So please correct me F LAT INO if I am wrong.

Once again, thanks for sharing.

GLC

Quote from: sherminator on Jun 25, 06:24 PM 2010
Just to make sure that I understand, it looks like you are waiting for all 9 sectors to appear.
Then once all the 9 sectors appear, you are betting the 4 that are furthest away.

So for example, if you see sectors. . .

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Then the 4 furthest sectors are 1,2,3,4.

One of the qualifications for playing this method however is that the 4 furthest sectors must include all dozens and columns.

So in this case, sector 1 covers dozen 1 and column 1.
sector 2 covers dozen 1 and column 2.
sector 3 covers dozen 1 and column 3.
sector 4 covers dozen 2 and column 1.

So as you can see, the 4 furthest back sectors cover all dozens and columns (1,2,3)

If I am wrong, then I have just made a fool of myself, lol.

So please correct me F LAT INO if I am wrong.

Once again, thanks for sharing.

F.

Thanks very much for sharing this system.  Your example looks very promising.  We are eager to start testing it.  We just need to make sure we have all the rules right.  No sense in testing it the wrong way.

Sherm,

Thanks for helping us understand.  I agree with everything you said except when you said that the 4 crossing must cover every doz and col.  You will notic that your example does not cover doz 3.  It is impossible to cover all 6 doz and col with these 8 bets. 

If you will notice in F's reply #3 he stated that the crossings must "touch" every doz and col.  That is doable.

To bet we just place a chip on the 8 splits.  If lose mark off the crossing we just played.  See if the last 4 crossings touch each of the 6 dozs and cols.  Then bet 1 chip on each of the 8 splits.  Continue this way while losing with 1 chip ea, 1 chip ea, 2 chips ea, 2 chips ea, 3 chips ea, etc...  Anytime we are +10 or more, start over tracking the nine crossings.

What do you think?

Once again, Thanks F LAT INO for sharing.

P.S.  Please don't let Atlantis know my ADD has kicked in already.
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

keel44

I have trouble following your tracking rules.  On your spreadsheet, your first trigger is 4,6,7,8.  I understand that.  Your 2nd trigger says 3,4,7,8.  Your trigger should be:  8,7,4,6 --which does not qualify.

Am I wrong here??



KEEL

sherminator

Hello GLC,

I believe you are correct, I thought it was too good to be true, lol.
It normally takes me a few times reading something before I get the hang of things.
I should have read it a second time.  Thank you for the clarification.  
I am going to test it because it looks good to me.  I like these type of bets.

sherminator


GLC

Quote from: GLC on Jun 25, 06:48 PM 2010
F.

"It is impossible to cover all 6 doz and col with these 8 bets."

After thinking about this statement, I think you can cover all dozens and all columns with 4 crossings.

Crossings 1,5,9 or 3,5,7 would cover dozens and columns, so, I guess we'll have to wait for F LAT INO to clarify for us.

Sorry if I caused any confusion guys.

G.
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

F_LAT_INO

Gents,
Here will explain this bet once more/it might be possible that have made some
type errors--lol it-- took me 3 weeks to do that/as am not sort of friendly with
this box/computer/--so here we go;invented numbers to be easy to explain.

numb.         sect.          W             L             Overall

4                   1
6                  
27                
22                
31                 7
24                
29                 8
11                
23                 5-here is a trigger for next spin-POSSIBLE-bet.And the
                                          trigger show us that our-.POSSIBLE BET-is;sectors
                                          1-3-4-9......therefore there is a -NO BET MODE-next
                                           spin,cause----4 sectors are covering 3 dozens and 1st
                                           and third column,but not column 2-so we continue
                                           tracking
12-                3-writing new spin--at the same time ERASING sector 3 previously spun
                        and our next possible bet is-1-4-7-9---no bet next spin-missing col.2
16-                4-write new spin--erase previously spun sector 4-and possible next bet is
                        -1-6-7-9--missing  column 2--no bet next spin
36                   -erase sector 9-possible next bet-1-6-7-8--and this is our real trigger
                        for next bet--which covers all dozens and columns--so we are
                        betting splits=1/4,7/10---15/18,21/24--25/28,31/34--26/29,32/35
                        with explained progression
11-                2- erase previous                                 1-/8 chips/-same bet              8-
33-                9- erase previous                                 1-/8 chips/-same bet             16-
18-                6-erase previous        win-2/20 chips/  2+                                           4+
                        possible next bet=1-5-7-8-no bet-missing column 3--and now
                        tracking until a new betting oportunity---continuing same bet in
                        this case.Will continue further explanations and potentials of this bet
                        after a soccer game in S.A.                                                                                                                                                                                                    
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

-