Looking for new ideas

[beretta28]

It's a quite old method,often illustrated with other old methods like D'Alembert,Labby,Guetting etc,but it has nothing to do with them .Players consider this system as useless as the other I mentioned here above.
They are completely wrong.

Of course if a player is not ready to have 15000 $ in the pocket, stop playing at + 150 $ per day and spend 5/6 hours in average at the table,he can stop reading now.


The system is played quite frequently by european players,Casinos know it very well,but they don't mind about + 150 $ per day,because sooner or later the system fails.
The interesting issue is that it could never fails in your gambler life,but as all systems can fail at the first session(,never happened sofar to me or to other 20/30 people that play it with satisfaction).
The system is called "Group of seven" or G7 and you can find it in Italian at :.rouletteprofessionisti.com.
The basic description  is very old(a few years ago),but some few modifications, that I'm ready to explain, have been introduced in the last years.
First try to find it and well understand the basic system(sorry,it's a bit complicated due to the italian language mainly)




If you understand italian you will see hundreds of comment in this thread of people having payed their yearly loan for their house,other having accumulated 3 or 4 times the starting BKR,others that have lost their bkr but have had the time to win 20000 $ or â,¬,other that simply keep on winning since several years




Almost all members know how much I'm pessimistic about roulette systems posted here that can win only if the player is very lucky.
This situation generates the confusion between good system and pure luck.This luck can last for a few sessions,but has nothing to do with the systems,that usually are not good at all.
G7 or Groupe of 7 has also a small statistical advantage that make it the sole system that In My Humble Opinion can be played.


Good luck




P.S:if Administrateur or MOD agree they can open a new discussion called G7 for example,because if this topic is interesting for the members,it will be a very long thread

[ander]

I like this style of play, where you secure small wins each session. This is what I use when playing. If you play no zero roulette you most certainly will go on the plus size each session using a strategy that keeps you in the game longer.

[F_LAT_INO]

I went there but couldn't find it nor any forum where ppl.
are talking about experiences with the method...any help.

[sniper]

F_LAT_INO


Please check here.


link:://vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=18904.msg138026#msg138026

[beretta28]

Sorry F_LAT_INO.The link is:
:.roulette.forumfree.it


Look at section: "LOTTA ALLA ROULETTE"

[beretta28]

The basic system is the one that sniper posted here above.
The modifications make it playable.
It's not true that it's a disaster(LOL)!

[beretta28]

The basic system is the one that sniper posted here above.
The modifications make it playable.
I confirm that the basic system is dangerous,even you can play for a few thousands spins without no risk.
Today wiyh some changes introduced by 2 members is in my opinion the best existing system,even if difficult and boring to play for a small 1% of BKR

[sniper]

Hello Beretta28,


Thank you for the system.


Could you please kindly highlight us on the modification.


Regards

[beretta28]

Main point:every group of 7 spins,has 72% to be succesful.
Don't forget it,and you'll understand the importance of modifications.
I repeat:boring,long,not for a player entering a Casino twice a year,2 hours play,just for fun.
In this case play the date of birthday or room number.It's the same.....
Let's come back to G7.
Here how I play(modifications included) after a few months of testing at home with paper and pen.
BKR 15000 â,¬ wingoal 150 â,¬
The common sense says to start at the minimum of the table(5â,¬),but I'm so sure of the result that I start with 10 â,¬ bet,playing the three EC at the same time.
Pay attention not to make mistakes in registering decisions(a bit difficult....).
Bet selection:for me it doesn't exist,so you can play the EC you want or make the bet selection you like more.
When I'm in a Casino with a lot of open table,I wait until in a given table I see 9 ECs in a row(Marigny theory,unbalance 3)and then I attack the other EC.
It' complicated,because you can play Red on table 1,Even in table 3,High in table 6 and very often not at the same time.
A lot of players prefer to sit down and play the 3 ECs at the same time without any trigger.
Very good, less boring and long.
I prefer to wait for 9 in a row,where it's possible
Most important modification:
when my bet would be higher than 50 units(but it's up to you,it could be 30 units or 100 units,my experience says 50 for pratically no risk) I divide the negative balance to ricover by 3 and I continue with group of 7 for ricovering the first "THIRD",after I try to ricover the second "THIRD" and so on.
I LET 72% OF CHANCE OF SUCCESS TO WORK FOR ME!
My experience is that with an unbalance of 4,5(Marigny criteria,it means 20/21 Loss in a row) the system resists.Above 4,5 it fails.Seen 2 or 3 thimes in my "very long" life of players.
I hope it's clear.
Test it and you see how many spins are necessary for +150â,¬.
Very often 50 spins are enough or 300 are not enough.
Playing in the same time 3 ECs,usually 2 out of three go like honey,no problems at all,the third needs may be to increase the bet.......
Good luck

[F_LAT_INO]

Funny,


I posted a method this morning--Last 3 uncles,furthest 3 aunties,catch up both--


in cycles of 7.....coincidence...