A Baccarat System

[Tomla021]

would have to play this with many charts etc.. ure seems crazy but what do I know?

[Tomla021]

your seems crazy but what do I know?---I meant sure seems crazy

[albertojonas]

GLC my point also - that is why i think my own solutions are more clever ...

Lets say we clustering patterns of three RBB wish can come in 8 combinations.

Now if we play the same as the previous 3 then we have 1 in 8 to fail - pretty simple math and odds.
Now if we play the opposite as the previous 3 then we have 1 in 8 to fail - pretty simple math and odds.

Due to the small size equilibrium will create some heavy fluctuation and string of losses.
Then we can delay equilibrium and fluctuation.

Once in 1 million do we get 1 pattern out of 8 repeating 8 times in a row.

Now if we see the previous three as i mention above and the first colour of our previous three is the same as our first future outcome we play opposite.
Now if we see the previous three as i mention above and the first colour of our previous three is the opposite as our first future outcome we play same.

Then we have 2 in 8 wish appears to repeat once in 500.000 and we only have to place two single bets.
I don't be live any other patterns become much better then that - no matter if you play with or against or trending.

That would at least delay long strings wish would make staking in different levels make you take andvantage out of periodic distribution.

There is no other bet selection better or worst than this one. Educated Guessing.
More than this, just physics, to get an edge...


cheers

[Bayes]

If I remember right the patterns were pulled out of observing huge volumes of decisions and this always makes me a little uneasy with the results because it is a little like reverse engineering based on observing past patterns, but those patterns have come and gone and they don't really prove that they will repeat enough to capitalize on.

Thanks George. I'm with you on the reverse engineering thing, although you'd think if these guys really are scientists then they would know better.

@ turner,

You make a good point about the CSM, not sure whether they're used in baccarat though. At DublinBet they're not. The doc is pretty vague about why these patterns are so special; they can't be based on inadequate shuffling of the shoe, because that wouldn't explain why those particular patterns are more likely. If the shoe has clumps of cards which are in the same sequence as the previous shoe, then only a knowledge of the previous shoe would give you any advantage, not some fixed patterns which never change from one shoe to the next.

[Nickmsi]

 I don't believe you can predict the next spin using patterns of previous spins.  However, when I saw the detail and breadth of this study on baccarat, I thought I would do some preliminary tests to see if it can be used in roulette.


Also, the idea of using a graded progression for different types of patterns was interesting.  They suggest certain patterns be bet with 4 units, others with 2 units and the remainder with 1 unit.


They also have some positive and negative progressions as well.


Instead of P for Player and B for Banker, I used H for High and L for Low.


I found that you would be betting only about 10-12 times per 100 spins.


I tested this with both flat bets and their graded bets and both systems were negative.  I saw no need to test further with their positive or negative progressions.


There may be other ways of applying this system to roulette and if anyone wishes to continue studying this method, I am attaching my Excel spreadsheet program for their use.


Cheers . . . Nick

[albertojonas]

For Even Chance Bets i use Random.org. I believe it is a TRNG so i test stuff using pregenerated randomizations from different dates.
I stand for what Ego mentioned as Educated Guessing. I here show how 300 spin sessions would behave using it.
I use a progression of +1unit when Loss when i am below zero.
1st session is form 01-01-2012
and so on.


I sugest making 10 units and call it a day.


Draw your conclusions.
Cheers
[attachimg=1]
[attachimg=2]
[attachimg=3]
[attachimg=4]
[attachimg=5]
[attachimg=6]

[albertojonas]

i wonder when fluctuation will hit me...


here the following 6 sessions

[albertojonas]

 




[attachimg=1]

[KoolKat]

It would be interesting to see if a prediction on the next spin using patterns of previous spins actually works with the BIP160 system. Like other posts here I have tried to keep track of patterns to no avail. Does anyone know if there is a bot out there. I am more than happy to contribute towards the time taken.