#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => Main Roulette Board => Topic started by: amk on Jun 08, 03:15 PM 2011

Title: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 08, 03:15 PM 2011
                                                                CODE 4

CODE 4 is a very simple method which was inspired by JohnLegends PATTERN 4. Its strength comes from combining dozens and columns CODE 4 DC aswell as EO and HL CODE 4 EC. EO/HL approach was established by Atlantis...

It should only be played HIT AND RUN....


                                                              CODE 4 DC

Note down the last 12 spins of dozens/columns alternating into 3 groups each 4 wide..

Example:  numbers 1,2,3 are dozens, letters A,B,C are columns

                             2B1C
                             3C2A
                             2C3A
                              .........  fourth pattern


Once we have our 3 groups each 4 wide we are betting that the fourth pattern will be different from the first... In this case we are betting on dozens 1/3 then columns A/C then dozens 2/3 then columns A/B  Playing progression is 1/1, 3/3, 9/9  You can also chose to play 1/1, 3/3, 9/9, 27/27. However as you shall see the strikerate for the first 3 bets is very HIGH...

1600 live Spielbank spins were played consecutively so we have an indication what HIT AND RUN looks like....

385 games played, 279 wins on bet 1, 65 on bet 2, 24 on bet 3, 5 on bet 4, 5 total loses...


                                                              CODE 4 EC

Note down the last 12 spins of EO/HL alternating into 3 groups each 4 wide...

Example:  E O are Even Odd, H L are High Low

                            ELEH
                            OLOH
                            EHOH
                            ......... fourth pattern

Once we have our 3 groups each 4 wide we are betting that the fourth pattern will be different from the first... In this case we are betting OHOL. Playing progression is 1,2,4,8  If a losing game is experienced you can go to level 2 progression 3,6,12,24 for 5 games.....

During 1067 live Spielbank spins played again consecutively so we see how HIT AND RUN will perform.....

240 games played, 123 wins on bet 1, 64 wins on bet 2, 26 wins on bet 3, 14 wins on bet 4, total loses 13.


It will take all of us to perfect these methods. By sharing our data and knowledge we can forge a playing style which can hopefully make life a lot easier for all of us....

I look forward to your feedback and thank you for sharing.......
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 08, 04:00 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 08, 03:15 PM 2011
                                                               CODE 4

CODE 4 is a very simple method which was inspired by JohnLegends PATTERN 4. Its strength comes from combining dozens and columns CODE 4 DC as well as EO and HL CODE 4 EC. EO/HL approach was established by Atlantis...

It should only be played HIT AND RUN....


                                                             CODE 4 DC

Note down the last 12 spins of dozens/columns alternating into 3 groups each 4 wide..

Example:  numbers 1,2,3 are dozens, letters A,B,C are columns

                            2B1C
                            3C2A
                            2C3A
                             .........  fourth pattern


Once we have our 3 groups each 4 wide we are betting that the fourth pattern will be different from the first... In this case we are betting on dozens 1/3 then columns A/C then dozens 2/3 then columns A/B  Playing progression is 1/1, 3/3, 9/9  You can also chose to play 1/1, 3/3, 9/9, 27/27. However as you shall see the strikerate for the first 3 bets is very HIGH...

1600 live Spielbank spins were played consecutively so we have an indication what HIT AND RUN looks like....

385 games played, 279 wins on bet 1, 65 on bet 2, 24 on bet 3, 5 on bet 4, 5 total loses...


                                                             CODE 4 EC

Note down the last 12 spins of EO/HL alternating into 3 groups each 4 wide...

Example:  E O are Even Odd, H L are High Low

                           ELEH
                           OLOH
                           EHOH
                           ......... fourth pattern

Once we have our 3 groups each 4 wide we are betting that the fourth pattern will be different from the first... In this case we are betting OHOL. Playing progression is 1,2,4,8  If a losing game is experienced you can go to level 2 progression 3,6,12,24 for 5 games.....

During 1067 live Spielbank spins played again consecutively so we see how HIT AND RUN will perform.....

240 games played, 123 wins on bet 1, 64 wins on bet 2, 26 wins on bet 3, 14 wins on bet 4, total loses 13.


It will take all of us to perfect these methods. By sharing our data and knowledge we can forge a playing style which can hopefully make life a lot easier for all of us....

I look forward to your feedback and thank you for sharing.......

Let me start by congratulating AMK for merging two elements together to form a formiddable compound. CODE 4 promises a strikerate comparable to MATRIX VERTICAL 5. But with a certain 16 spin game. No long uncertain waiting which means what AMK has possibly unknowingly done. Is create a method that is like a land casino friendly MV5. And I don't think that's a small thing having played MV5 for some time now. I have played 80 games so far and they have all won. I was never taken to the 4th step of the progression once. Even with 5 of my games containing a ZERO. I think this method is fantastic. Here are the results...

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 80
TOTAL GAMES WON 80
TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 160 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 49

STEP 2 WINS 24

STEP 3 WINS 7

I play two game HIT AND RUN sessions. So I play two consecutive games then shut it down. I am hoping for a strikerate of around double my progression playing hit and run. So I will be most satisfied with 160/1. But I have a feeling that will be exceeded. I will post results for every 40 new games I play so next update at 120 games then 160 games etc... 8)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 08, 04:07 PM 2011
JL with the consecutive games does the fourth pattern become your new first pattern? Or do you start again with 12 new spins?
so

1b2c
2a3b
2a2c
. . . . . . .  fourth pattern (then becomes first)

does it become line one of the next 12 or do you spin 12 new ones?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 08, 04:46 PM 2011
Quote from: Juiced91 on Jun 08, 04:07 PM 2011
JL with the consecutive games does the fourth pattern become your new first pattern? Or do you start again with 12 new spins?
so

1b2c
2a3b
2a2c
. . . . . . .  fourth pattern (then becomes first)

does it become line one of the next 12 or do you spin 12 new ones?
Yes Juiced91 you are correct. Welcome to the thread.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Gordonline on Jun 08, 07:31 PM 2011
Hi All

Excellent idea AMK, Twister and also the "Legend" of course  :thumbsup:

Was having a play tonight with P4 and outcome was as usual 3 winning games, but at the same time was writing the "Divinci Code 4" down on the notepad and realised that as there are numerous patterns with this method, Random will have a hard time decoding this one  ;D

I was thinking to myself that you could randomly pick any number of patterns and bet against yourself that you cannot predict they will appear in that exact order, I'm not saying for one minute that no one else has thought of that and apologies if this has already been said on the forum, just that with so many different combinations surely the odds are well stacked in your favour.

Future is looking bright with P4, Pattern Breaker, Code 4 etc..........2012 will be an interesting year !!!!!!!!!!!

Tomorrow I will post the Code 4 patterns as they would appear from my 3500 spins so anyone can test them

Gordon
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Hermes on Jun 08, 08:51 PM 2011
If you bet dozens or columns use Leveller progression instead of Marty.
1-2-4 and than play 4 until total in plus. It takes you through the valleys to the hills.
On ECs I would use the Alembert L+1 u. W -1 u. Or you can use D'All Turbo L+1 u. W -2 u. Oscar Grind is also suitable. On Al turbo you would circle the last win and cross the one before.
Hermes
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on Jun 08, 11:18 PM 2011
Here's my BetVoyager session.  Very Good  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 09, 02:06 AM 2011
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 link=topic=5848. msg56349#msg56349 date=1307589514
Here's my BetVoyager session.   Very Good  :thumbsup:

Why do you bet so many times??

As far as i know if you win the first bet you virtual spin the rest? not bet on all patterns.

I. e

2A3B
3B1A
2B1A

Now we best against the 2nd dozen if win we virtual spin the rest and start again, if we lost the bet, bet against column A.  I dont beleive we bet aganst them all.

Its like pattern 4.

Maybe someone can clear this Up?

D
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 09, 02:28 AM 2011
Quote from: Juiced91 on Jun 09, 02:06 AM 2011
Why do you bet so many times??

As far as I know if you win the first bet you virtual spin the rest? not bet on all patterns.

I. e

2A3B
3B1A
2B1A

Now we best against the 2nd dozen if win we virtual spin the rest and start again, if we lost the bet, bet against column A.  I don't beleive we bet aganst them all.

Its like pattern 4.

Maybe someone can clear this Up?

D

you bet for ANY ONE difference in a pattern . if you get a win you move to the next line, and bet for 4 lines up(turbo mode). you don't bet for all of the 4 to be different, thats bad as some will be the same
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 09, 02:43 AM 2011
Quote from: Halba1 link=topic=5848. msg56362#msg56362 date=1307600908
you bet for ANY ONE difference in a pattern .  if you get a win you move to the next line, and bet for 4 lines up(turbo mode).  you don't bet for all of the 4 to be different, that's bad as some will be the same

Yeah thats what i was saying. .

If you look at his pic you will see that he bets on all the combinations.

3B3B

He bets on dozen 1&2 then he bets A&C.


Which i believe is incorrect.  Or im reading it wrong
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 09, 04:00 AM 2011
yep. he is betting on each one individual which is a significant modification.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: jordan69 on Jun 09, 04:27 AM 2011
Hello,

Thanks for this post AMK.
It sounds great.

One question :
Do you have any idea in term of winning goal ?
i mean a +6, +8 or +10 units for each or your session (for example) ?
or not at all ?

Best regards.
Jordan69
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 09, 04:30 AM 2011
Quote from: jordan69 link=topic=5848. msg56375#msg56375 date=1307608056
Hello,

Thanks for this post AMK.
It sounds great.

One question :
Do you have any idea in term of winning goal ?
i mean a +6, +8 or +10 units for each or your session (for example) ?
or not at all ?

Best regards.
Jordan69

I would just play as JL does playing two consecutive games for +2 units then exit come back later. .
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: jordan69 on Jun 09, 04:32 AM 2011
Thanks for your quick reply Juiced91.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 09, 04:42 AM 2011
Quote from: jordan69 link=topic=5848. msg56378#msg56378 date=1307608346
Thanks for your quick reply Juiced91.

No problem  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 09, 05:28 AM 2011
these are good systems. but i wouldn't play each letter/number. just 1. best not to be greedy. but funnily enough the results look good.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 09, 06:36 AM 2011
Hello Juiced91 and Halba1,

I might have not explained it clear enough...

Once we have our three groups of four alternating D & C spins we bet that the fourth pattern is different from the first...

Once we have a win we stop....  do not bet further.....

If you are going to play like JohnLegend then after a win you would virtually spin to finish your group of 4 then start the process again......
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: soggett on Jun 09, 07:34 AM 2011
Have you tried betting for the pattern?
I am having great results playing for the pattern
In that way we use a longer progression but about the same amount of units
And we can win more per hit (sometimes 2 and sometimes 5 units)
Can you check your results and see how would it go betting for the pattern? Thanks
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: monaco on Jun 09, 07:58 AM 2011
what would be your recovery if you did have 4 losses?
do you mean to have 3 levels as in P4?

cheers
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Gordonline on Jun 09, 08:58 AM 2011

Hi AMK and all

Attached Excel File "3700 Spins Code 4 Format" (These are all Live Wheel Spins)

As promised I have managed to rarrange my Live Spin Data into the Code 4 format for everyone who's interested in testing out the patterns, because we only take the 1st number for the Dozens and the second number for the Columns it took quite a bit of data sorting to come up with the correct layout

Enjoy  ;D

Gordon
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 09, 10:38 AM 2011
What a contribution Gordonline!!

Amazing..... I am sure we will find some more MAGIC CODES here somewhere.......
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Gordonline on Jun 09, 11:02 AM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 09, 10:38 AM 2011
What a contribution Gordonline!!

Amazing..... I am sure we will find some more MAGIC CODES here somewhere.......

Hi AMK

Your welcome.........Only glad to help  ;D

Gordon
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: jordan69 on Jun 09, 12:05 PM 2011
Once we have our 3 groups each 4 wide we are betting that the fourth pattern will be different from the first... In this case we are betting on dozens 1/3 then columns A/C then dozens 2/3 then columns A/B  Playing progression is 1/1, 3/3, 9/9  You can also chose to play 1/1, 3/3, 9/9, 27/27. However as you shall see the strikerate for the first 3 bets is very HIGH...

1600 live Spielbank spins were played consecutively so we have an indication what HIT AND RUN looks like....

385 games played, 279 wins on bet 1, 65 on bet 2, 24 on bet 3, 5 on bet 4, 5 total loses...


Had a look on these results and my conclusion was :

1) 5 total losses => -400 units

2) all the wins (279 + 65 + 24 + 5) => + 373 units
... if played with 1/1/ 3/3 9/9 27/27 and without the 0 fees...

so global result is : - 27 units (+ 0 fees that we can't avoid)

that's right no ?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Gordonline on Jun 09, 12:22 PM 2011

Hi All

I know there are alot more intelligent people on here than me, so correct me if I'm wrong but with my limited knowledge I think there are 81 different patterns with this Code4...........thats alot !!!!!!!!

Every time we commence a betting sequence we have odds of 80/1 in our favour WOW  ;D


Gordon  ;D
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 09, 12:31 PM 2011
Hello Jordan69,

I tested CODE 4 playing consecutively ie back to back to back etc.... Playing this way yes it would indeed not yield good results for we would have had met five loses. I played consecutively so that we get an indication what HIT AND RUN looks like. JohnLegend has taught us that this is the way to play for you have a far greater chance to dodge the loses.....

So if we were to play the same 1600 spins played HIT AND RUN we know that somewhere in those 1600 spins are 5 loses. HIT AND RUN we would perhaps only play 53 games and the chance that we dodge the loses is very large.

The 1/1 3/3 9/9 progression would lessen our loses....

JohnLegend could explain this beter.....
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: warrior on Jun 09, 12:37 PM 2011
Quote from: jordan69 on Jun 09, 12:05 PM 2011
Once we have our 3 groups each 4 wide we are betting that the fourth pattern will be different from the first... In this case we are betting on dozens 1/3 then columns A/C then dozens 2/3 then columns A/B  Playing progression is 1/1, 3/3, 9/9  You can also chose to play 1/1, 3/3, 9/9, 27/27. However as you shall see the strikerate for the first 3 bets is very HIGH...

1600 live Spielbank spins were played consecutively so we have an indication what HIT AND RUN looks like....

385 games played, 279 wins on bet 1, 65 on bet 2, 24 on bet 3, 5 on bet 4, 5 total loses...


Had a look on these results and my conclusion was :

1) 5 total losses => -400 units

2) all the wins (279 + 65 + 24 + 5) => + 373 units
... if played with 1/1/ 3/3 9/9 27/27 and without the 0 fees...

so global result is : - 27 units (+ 0 fees that we can't avoid)

that's right no ?

for ex. if we start with 5 $ units based on the wins on the 1st 2n 3rd 4th and the 5 losses i think i got -136 could be wrong .
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: jordan69 on Jun 09, 12:42 PM 2011
Quote from: warrior on Jun 09, 12:37 PM 2011
for ex. if we start with 5 $ units based on the wins on the 1st 2n 3rd 4th and the 5 losses I think I got -136 could be wrong .

Oups, i can't see how you can have - 136 units  ???
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: jordan69 on Jun 09, 12:43 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 09, 12:31 PM 2011
Hello Jordan69,

I tested CODE 4 playing consecutively ie back to back to back etc.... Playing this way yes it would indeed not yield good results for we would have had met five loses. I played consecutively so that we get an indication what HIT AND RUN looks like. JohnLegend has taught us that this is the way to play for you have a far greater chance to dodge the loses.....

So if we were to play the same 1600 spins played HIT AND RUN we know that somewhere in those 1600 spins are 5 loses. HIT AND RUN we would perhaps only play 53 games and the chance that we dodge the loses is very large.

The 1/1 3/3 9/9 progression would lessen our loses....

JohnLegend could explain this beter.....

Thanks AMK :)
I see what you mean.


Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Twisteruk on Jun 09, 12:46 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 08, 03:15 PM 2011
                                                                CODE 4

CODE 4 is a very simple method which was inspired by JohnLegends PATTERN 4. Its strength comes from combining dozens and columns CODE 4 DC as well as EO and HL CODE 4 EC. EO/HL approach was established by Atlantis...

It should only be played HIT AND RUN....


                                                              CODE 4 DC

Note down the last 12 spins of dozens/columns alternating into 3 groups each 4 wide..

Example:  numbers 1,2,3 are dozens, letters A,B,C are columns

                             2B1C
                             3C2A
                             2C3A
                              .........  fourth pattern


Once we have our 3 groups each 4 wide we are betting that the fourth pattern will be different from the first... In this case we are betting on dozens 1/3 then columns A/C then dozens 2/3 then columns A/B  Playing progression is 1/1, 3/3, 9/9  You can also chose to play 1/1, 3/3, 9/9, 27/27. However as you shall see the strikerate for the first 3 bets is very HIGH...

1600 live Spielbank spins were played consecutively so we have an indication what HIT AND RUN looks like....

385 games played, 279 wins on bet 1, 65 on bet 2, 24 on bet 3, 5 on bet 4, 5 total loses...



Hi guys  :)

I know Im late to this Party what with one thing and another

Just one question to amk,

Are the above figures not a Bust ?

You bet 1/1 3/3 9/9 27/27 =80 points

You said there were 5 total losses ?? Thats -400 points.

385 games played, 279 wins on bet 1, 65 on bet 2, 24 on bet 3, 5 on bet 4, 5 total loses...

385 played

279
+65
+24
+5
+5

=378

Are we missing 7 games ?



Maybe its me and ive missed something, sorry if thats the case. And sorry if this has already been covered


Cheers guys
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 09, 12:54 PM 2011
This isn't aimed @ anyone, just getting my part out there...

It seems like throughout the forum people misunderstand the words "hit & run" ???
If you Google it you find under Wiki there are a few explanations.... however, what is meant here is - you get your goal units and get out!!!

The 1600 spins were given just as an example. (If you had to play 1600 spins non stop, you would at least be playing 26 hours NON STOP....make your own assumptions form this)So in my opinion all the systems based on the "matrix" layouts does really well, if played according to the creators rules and if done in a hit and run manner.

I recon anyways, that if you play CODE 4

and you have lost

1/1/ 3/3 9/9 27/27
1/1/ 3/3 9/9 27/27
1/1/ 3/3 9/9 27/27
1/1/ 3/3 9/9 27/27
1/1/ 3/3 9/9 27/27

and still playing....it's your own fault. If I had a wipeout after the first one, I would already switch over to CODE 4 H/L , O/E to see if I could catch up/change to completely different system...or I'll call it a night.

Anyway, just wanted to share what I thought.

Regards,



Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 09, 01:13 PM 2011
Hello TWisteruk!

Great that you have joined us here aswell....

I see what you mean with the games. I will review my notes. However, I can assure you that all losing games were noted and there were only 5.... I think this might have happened when I was counting how many wins were on bet 1,2,3,4,. Somewhere along the line I missed 7 for either bet 1,2,3,4 Not for loses, there were only 5 and didn't miss counting one. With the other bets there were so many that I missed some....

I think the answer to your question can be found in the reply to Jordan69.
Yes it is a bust played consecutively. However, if you look at it from a progression of 1/1 3/3 9/9 we would be up +238 units... I hadn't looked at it in this Light and is kind of scary if it is correct. Can somebody double check this......
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Twisteruk on Jun 09, 01:28 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 09, 01:13 PM 2011
Hello TWisteruk!

Great that you have joined us here as well....

I see what you mean with the games. I will review my notes. However, I can assure you that all losing games were noted and there were only 5.... I think this might have happened when I was counting how many wins were on bet 1,2,3,4,. Somewhere along the line I missed 7 for either bet 1,2,3,4 Not for loses, there were only 5 and didn't miss counting one. With the other bets there were so many that I missed some....

I think the answer to your question can be found in the reply to Jordan69.
Yes it is a bust played consecutively. However, if you look at it from a progression of 1/1 3/3 9/9 we would be up +238 units... I hadn't looked at it in this Light and is kind of scary if it is correct. Can somebody double check this......

Ah no worries mate  :thumbsup:

However I did look at it in that light and concluded there must be an error. NO Busts on the 3 step ? Peroid ?
Are you sure thats correct ?

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: jordan69 on Jun 09, 01:41 PM 2011
Quote from: Maui13 on Jun 09, 12:54 PM 2011
This isn't aimed @ anyone, just getting my part out there...

It seems like throughout the forum people misunderstand the words "hit & run" ???
If you Google it you find under Wiki there are a few explanations.... however, what is meant here is - you get your goal units and get out!!!

The 1600 spins were given just as an example. (If you had to play 1600 spins non stop, you would at least be playing 26 hours NON STOP....make your own assumptions form this)So in my opinion all the systems based on the "matrix" layouts does really well, if played according to the creators rules and if done in a hit and run manner.

I recon anyways, that if you play CODE 4

and you have lost

1/1/ 3/3 9/9 27/27
1/1/ 3/3 9/9 27/27
1/1/ 3/3 9/9 27/27
1/1/ 3/3 9/9 27/27
1/1/ 3/3 9/9 27/27

and still playing....it's your own fault. If I had a wipeout after the first one, I would already switch over to CODE 4 H/L , O/E to see if I could catch up/change to completely different system...or I'll call it a night.

Anyway, just wanted to share what I thought.

Regards,



Hi Maui,
thanks for your thoughts.

I know we wouldn't play all the time but i thought that maybe, it could
give us an indication about the system. That's why i had a look on it.

In fact, i fully understood Hit and Run play, that's the way i play :)
and the EC's have my preference... Dont want to be bored by the green :)

Regards.

Jordan69

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Twisteruk on Jun 09, 01:44 PM 2011
Quote from: soggett on Jun 09, 07:34 AM 2011
Have you tried betting for the pattern?
I am having great results playing for the pattern
In that way we use a longer progression but about the same amount of units
And we can win more per hit (sometimes 2 and sometimes 5 units)
Can you check your results and see how would it go betting for the pattern? Thanks

Yes, I play this way  ;D
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 09, 01:50 PM 2011
Hey Jordan,

I'm actually divided about it all...

I fully agree with you in that we should pound any system with X number of spins, but we should also think about it in reality that no system would last throughout those amount of spins.

and on the other hand....

I think we should pound a system to death with 10 000000000 spins (not really  :twisted: ) with the hope that it will regain lost profit/units .... the ultimate system!!!


So far, hit and run, CODE 4 works great for me. Who also has success with this?

Regards,


Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 09, 01:51 PM 2011
Hello Twisteruk!

Well, there were only 5 wins on bet 4. This would then mean that we would have five loses if we were playing progression 1/1 3/3 9/9 However there were also five straight loses after bet 4. So this than means we had 10 total loses when playing 3 bets which than means we would be up +108 units.

368 units won minus 260 units lost (10X26) = +108 units

I hope I am seeing this right........... :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: soggett on Jun 09, 02:12 PM 2011
Quote from: Twisteruk on Jun 09, 01:44 PM 2011
Yes, I play this way  ;D


I like playing this way, think its harder to lose, glad you play it to   :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 09, 02:43 PM 2011
Quote from: soggett on Jun 09, 02:12 PM 2011

I like playing this way, think its harder to lose, glad you play it to   :)
ITS THE ONLY WAY. Mathematicians argue theres no difference. THERE IS, when you adopt the HIT AND RUN principle you literally cheat randoms keeper, the LAW OF AVERAGES. I have recorded hundreds of consecutive spins for PATTERN 4. And there isnt one winning streak over 20 long. In fact even 12 seldom gets breached.

Playing HIT and RUN. I have several streaks over 20. And many over 12. Thats all I need to know. There will be aproximately 6 wins to every loss playing consecutively. So that means you will lose. The only way playing consecutively will take on another dimension is to wait for a Losing game trigger. Then it becomes a different ball game. As you will win around ****25 times to every DOUBLE LOSS****

The trigger makes CONSECUTIVE PLAY BETTER THAN HIT AND RUN. BUT, CAN YOU WAIT?????

For all of you who dont want to play HIT and RUN. And want to play this method WITH CERTAIN success consecutively. That is the way you do it. NOW CODE 4. Yes we have 80 units minumum at risk. For those who thinks thats too much, playing the first three steps for 26 units risk is the anwser. Ive now played 100 games and the last 20 all won in the first two steps HIT AND RUN, this method is a HOLY GRAIL.

Think about it for a moment you have 80/1 odds here. And playing a random game it becomes far greater. I am excited to see how long I go before I surrender my 80 points. More interesting still, is to see how long I go before I lose my first game of the DAY. Now think very carefully about this one I have a winning streak of 37 with PATTERN 4 with odds of 7/1. EXCITING TIMES ahead...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 09, 03:10 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend link=topic=5848. msg56481#msg56481 date=1307644984
ITS THE ONLY WAY.  Mathematicians argue theres no difference.  THERE IS, when you adopt the HIT AND RUN principle you literally cheat randoms keeper, the LAW OF AVERAGES.  I have recorded hundreds of consecutive spins for PATTERN 4.  And there isnt one winning streak over 20 long.  In fact even 12 seldom gets breached.

Playing HIT and RUN.  I have several streaks over 20.  And many over 12.  that's all I need to know.  There will be aproximately 6 wins to every loss playing consecutively.  So that means you will lose.  The only way playing consecutively will take on another dimension is to wait for a Losing game trigger.  Then it becomes a different ball game.  As you will win around ****25 times to every DOUBLE LOSS****

The trigger makes CONSECUTIVE PLAY BETTER THAN HIT AND RUN.  BUT, CAN YOU WAIT?????

For all of you who don't want to play HIT and RUN.  And want to play this method WITH CERTAIN success consecutively.  That is the way you do it.  NOW CODE 4.  Yes we have 80 units minumum at risk.  For those who thinks that's too much, playing the first three steps for 26 units risk is the anwser.  I've now played 100 games and the last 20 all won in the first two steps HIT AND RUN, this method is a HOLY GRAIL.

Think about it for a moment you have 80/1 odds here.  And playing a random game it becomes far greater.  I am excited to see how long I go before I surrender my 80 points.  More interesting still, is to see how long I go before I lose my first game of the DAY.  Now think very carefully about this one I have a winning streak of 37 with PATTERN 4 with odds of 7/1.  EXCITING TIMES ahead. . . 

JL they were talking about playing for the pattern not against it.  They werent talking about playing hit and run.  i have been playing RNG and been so good so far will update at 20 plays.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 09, 03:28 PM 2011
THANKS AGAIN JOHNLEGEND :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 09, 04:35 PM 2011
Okay guys as i said i was playing on RNG and would update after 20 games.
I play progression 1-1, 3-3, 9-9, 27-27.  80 units so far only level 3 twice.

I play the same was as JL two consecutive games for +2 units then quit.  Dont know if it makes a dif on RNG whether hit and run but thats how i play it.

Starting bank roll of 90units.

GAMES PLAYED: 20
GAMES WON: 20
GAMES LOST: 0

WON ON BET 1: 10
WON ON BET 2: 8
WON ON BET 3: 2
WON ON BET 4: 0

Im up +16 units. 

Why 16 and not 20 you might ask and thats because when i spin for my 12 rounds i might get a zero and that takes 2 units and that happened twice as i cant spin for free i have to bet black and red.  Actually it happened more than twice four times to be exact, but two of those times i just played a turbo version.  I played for pattern 4 not equal to 1 and then pattern 5 not equal to two to get even again for the zero loss.

i will update again at 40 games and see if im still winning.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: warrior on Jun 09, 10:03 PM 2011
Quote from: jordan69 on Jun 09, 12:42 PM 2011
Oups, I can't see how you can have - 136 units  ???
i did go back my apology  dont no no how i got that.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: donik7777 on Jun 09, 10:07 PM 2011
Hi everyone!
Many thanks for your work and this forum, I have been observing these themes and would like to suggest using flat rates, for example, w beat only 1 spin (first spin),
we lose only 2 units (385 games played, 279-(65+24+5+5 x 2)=+81 profit, 
and there is no need to raise rates $ 50x80 = $ 4000.
Maybe I'm wrong.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 09, 10:31 PM 2011
Hey Donik7777 the plan is only to bet the first spin and hopefully win the first spin.. Even RNG its usually one by the 2nd spin but my tests are still early days..

But maybe you could be onto something to, but if we do flat bet we would take forever to cover up losses.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: donik7777 on Jun 09, 10:45 PM 2011
You can restrict 1 / 1 and 3 / 3 based on the results Gordonline also comes profit.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Hermes on Jun 10, 12:15 AM 2011
According to Wilson theory good combination for ECs:

BEBE
EBEB
BEBE
EBEB

AND

RORO
OROR
RORO
OROR

TRY ALSO

BOBO
OBOB
BOBO
OBOB

AND

RERE
ERER
RERE
ERER

but the first two should be better choice. I would be surprised if the second combinations win!
Hermes
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: kiamessi on Jun 10, 05:14 AM 2011
wat if we have 4 losses, what should we do?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 10, 05:19 AM 2011
Quote from: kiamessi on Jun 10, 05:14 AM 2011
Wat if we have 4 losses, what should we do?

call it a day come back tomorrow
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: donik7777 on Jun 10, 07:33 AM 2011
Hi Johnlegend, Gordonline, Twister and  AMK that if you play a flat rate only on the first spin for code4?
Don't need progression!
You can calculate yourself, please answer.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: warrior on Jun 10, 09:00 AM 2011
Quote from: jordan69 on Jun 09, 12:05 PM 2011
Once we have our 3 groups each 4 wide we are betting that the fourth pattern will be different from the first... In this case we are betting on dozens 1/3 then columns A/C then dozens 2/3 then columns A/B  Playing progression is 1/1, 3/3, 9/9  You can also chose to play 1/1, 3/3, 9/9, 27/27. However as you shall see the strikerate for the first 3 bets is very HIGH...

1600 live Spielbank spins were played consecutively so we have an indication what HIT AND RUN looks like....

385 games played, 279 wins on bet 1, 65 on bet 2, 24 on bet 3, 5 on bet 4, 5 total loses...


Had a look on these results and my conclusion was :

1) 5 total losses => -400 units

2) all the wins (279 + 65 + 24 + 5) => + 373 units
... if played with 1/1/ 3/3 9/9 27/27 and without the 0 fees...

so global result is : - 27----- ok I thought I was going nuts 373 is the total of the winning games at 5 dollar units that's 1865$,5 total losses if he went through the whole progression 1-1 3-3 9-9 27-27  =400x5=2000-1865=-135 that's continuos play hit run might change I don't no but oops I'm not wrong.



Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: woods101 on Jun 10, 09:05 AM 2011
Hi guys,

just to say it's wonderful to see everyone excorsing ( ;D) their maths 'o' level qualifications (or cse in my case!). As amk pointed out in his very first post profit could be gained by limitation of said progression...but it's worth remembering that 1600 or even 3000+ sample spins is a small amount of sample spins to test a system against if testing consecutively.
On a seperate note it's lovely to see that some people who in the past have torn strips of me for trying to explain the validity of playing hit and run, now say it's the only way they play.
Thanks to amk and others but more importantly a big thanks to Mr John Legend for enlightening the masses!

Luck to all,
woods

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Hermes on Jun 10, 11:18 AM 2011
"Wat if we have 4 losses, what should we do?"
Continue to bet progression on the next row. If you lose the 3 in row continue on the next row until hit and then wait for next row to start to bet again as usual.

warrior that's result of silly progression, not system. System is excellent, I won all sessions on roulette and baccarat.
One secure strategy be to bet only the first spin on a new row if lost wait for next row first spin but bet progression! e.g.. 1-3-7-15-31-63 or steady Labouchere?
BBB
RBR
BBB
-----
B rr     bet 1u. R, lost wait for next row
B         bet 3u. B, won

as there are many wins on first attempt.
Hermes
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: warrior on Jun 10, 11:28 AM 2011
Quote from: Hermes on Jun 10, 11:18 AM 2011
"Wat if we have 4 losses, what should we do?"
Continue to bet progression on the next row. If you lose the 3 in row continue on the next row until hit and then wait for next row to start to bet again as usual.

warrior that's result of silly progression, not system. System is excellent, I won all sessions on roulette and baccarat.
One secure possibility is to bet only the first spin on a new row if lost wait for next row first spin but bet progression! e.g..
BBB
RBR
BBB
-----
B rr     bet 1u. R, lost wait for next row
B         bet 3u. B, won

Hermes

hermes we have sunshine in WINNIPEG and a hockey team
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Hermes on Jun 10, 11:33 AM 2011
"hermes we have sunshine in WINNIPEG and a hockey team"
Is about time to have a sunshine after so much rain!
Kitchener welcome Winnipeg (North Africa)
Hermes
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 10, 03:53 PM 2011
Hello donik7777,

Thank you for your insights!

You are right. We would have been up +81 units if we were only betting the first bet with 1/1..

This approach would work well if you set a target of winning 3 or 5 units for the day....

Ironically you could perhaps play this approach best consecutively, reach your goal of 3 or 5 units and stop....

Play again the next day...

Some sessions might take 2 hours+ some sessions might only take half an hour...

But I feel if you have the PATIENCE you will almost always reach your 3 or 5 unit goal.....

You could perhaps take the lead with this approach and keep us posted on your results...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 10, 04:04 PM 2011
Quote from: donik7777 on Jun 10, 07:33 AM 2011
Hi Johnlegend, Gordonline, Twister and  AMK that if you play a flat rate only on the first spin for code4?
Don't need progression!
You can calculate yourself, please answer.

since we are playing on each line outcome, flat rate just doesn't cut it
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on Jun 10, 06:01 PM 2011
Here's an idea I wanted to share.  You could wait for a dozen to miss x times (example 3 times in a row before officially tracking.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: woods101 on Jun 10, 08:41 PM 2011
What about adding another set of dozens by splitting the board..?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: kiamessi on Jun 11, 12:14 AM 2011
and also, if there is  0 on the first spins, can we still play?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 11, 12:26 AM 2011
Quote from: kiamessi on Jun 11, 12:14 AM 2011
And also, if there is  0 on the first spins, can we still play?

Yes. Just carry on recording. I.e

2C0B (there is a zero in there but dont count that line)

Just record a new 12 from the start again.

***RNG update later***
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: kiamessi on Jun 11, 01:33 AM 2011
no losses so far as i didnt play on the games with 0 on the first spins (this was where losses occured if i had played) 
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: soggett on Jun 11, 08:49 AM 2011
Quote from: Juiced91 on Jun 09, 03:10 PM 2011
JL they were talking about playing for the pattern not against it.  They werent talking about playing hit and run.  I have been playing RNG and been so good so far will update at 20 plays.

Yes, that's right, I was talking of playing it betting FOR the pattern instead of against it

I agree on the hit and run being better than consecutive playing, that I understand fully
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 11, 10:27 AM 2011
CODE 4 UPDATE

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 120
TOTAL GAMES WON 120
TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 240 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 77
STEP 2 WINS 34
STEP 3 WINS 8
STEP 4 WINS 1

These are my numbers so far, with so many wins coming on the first 3 steps of the progression. I think 26 units risk is a gauranteed profit maker. I have had 7 zeros in my 120 games TWO in the game that pushed me to the fourth step. So for newbies or anyone I recommend using a three step progression. Next update at 160 games played.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: kiamessi on Jun 11, 10:36 AM 2011
is there any level for progression if we have 4 losses?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 11, 11:17 AM 2011
Quote from: kiamessi on Jun 11, 10:36 AM 2011
Is there any level for progression if we have 4 losses?
I think for those using the full four steps two levels should suffice

1,3,9,27X 2 LEVEL 1

2,6,18,54X 2 LEVEL 2=TOTAL RISK 240 UNITS

If you lose a game at level 1 you play the nest 20 games at level 2 to recover half your loss then drop down to level 1.

If playing only the first 3 steps you could use two levels like this.

1,3,9X 2 LEVEL 1

3,9,27X 2 LEVEL 2=104 UNITS RISK

If you lose at level 1 you play 5 games at level 2 to recover over half your loss then drop back down to level 1.

Also if I am able to string together winning streaks over 20 for the first game of the day for PATTERN 4 with odds of 7/1. Imagine the potential for CODE 4 with odds of 80/1. You could win the first game of the day for the whole year. Even first game of each session. We should stake to exploit this. ;D ;D
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: kiamessi on Jun 11, 12:39 PM 2011
yeah, the rate of winning of the first bet is significant, only for dozen and column though coz i have had to use step 3 for too many times on EC
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 11, 03:55 PM 2011
Hello JohnLegend!

You beat 2 ZEROS!!

Great advise and great observation for the first game played of the DAY....

This could be the MAGIC TOUCH.....

With the right staking and if you can afford it you could just play ONE game per day and be fine........

Now thats HIT AND RUN :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 11, 04:03 PM 2011
Twisteruk....

How is CODE 4 performing 4 U?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 11, 04:17 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 11, 03:55 PM 2011
Hello JohnLegend!

You beat 2 ZEROS!!

Great advise and great observation for the first game played of the DAY....

This could be the MAGIC TOUCH.....

With the right staking and if you can afford it you could just play ONE game per day and be fine........

Now that's HIT AND RUN :)
Hi AMK yes it is, or lets say you reach a level where you play three very separate games throughout the day. I am playing five sets of 2 games throughout the day. But I do believe that first game is going to produce fantastic winning streaks. I could still be winning it this time next year IN EUROPE.  ???
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 11, 05:26 PM 2011
You'll do fine JohnLegend.....

Look foward to EUROPE.......
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 11, 05:52 PM 2011
Okay guys here is the RNG update.

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 40
TOTAL GAMES WON 40
TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 36 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 21
STEP 2 WINS 14
STEP 3 WINS 5
STEP 4 WINS 0

As you can see i havent yet lost on RNG. But you can also see that my level 3 wins are almost the same as JL yet played less than half the games he has. Maybe a bad sign?

Will update sometime again.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on Jun 11, 05:57 PM 2011
What will be the Code 4 procedure for Ophis to code? John Legend's way, Amk's or Juiced91's?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: viclimks on Jun 12, 12:09 PM 2011
Quote from: Juiced91 link=topic=5848. msg56840#msg56840 date=1307829151
Okay guys here is the RNG update.

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 40
TOTAL GAMES WON 40
TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 36 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 21
STEP 2 WINS 14
STEP 3 WINS 5
STEP 4 WINS 0

As you can see I haven't yet lost on RNG.  But you can also see that my level 3 wins are almost the same as JL yet played less than half the games he has.  Maybe a bad sign?

Will update sometime again.


Juiced,do u retrack a new 12spins after a win???or continously.

Good Luck
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 12, 12:18 PM 2011
Hello Proofreaders2000,

Well, only one is necessary.....It is important to note that if you are playing 3 bets you still follow CODE 4 method meaning create 3 groups of 4 wide then begin your 3 bet progression....

I also think it is a good tactic to put $1 on the zero for all 3 bets or perhaps last 2  and last two bets for four wide... This way the zero becomes fun and CODE 4 has even more power.....

JohLegend what are your thoughts??
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 12, 01:13 PM 2011
Quote from: viclimks on Jun 12, 12:09 PM 2011
Juiced,do you a new 12spins after a win???or continously.

Good Luck

Hey man. I spin 12 spins then bet the next 4.

1A2B
3C1A
2C3C
1B3C (This is the line i bet on, this line then becomes the first line of the next 12)
2C1A
1B3C
2B3A(Bet this line)

Then im done betting for that session.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 12, 06:18 PM 2011
Viclimks........ pretty cool that it is your first post......
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 13, 03:04 AM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 12, 12:18 PM 2011
Hello Proofreaders2000,

Well, only one is necessary.....It is important to note that if you are playing 3 bets you still follow CODE 4 method meaning create 3 groups of 4 wide then begin your 3 bet progression....

I also think it is a good tactic to put $1 on the zero for all 3 bets or perhaps last 2  and last two bets for four wide... This way the zero becomes fun and CODE 4 has even more power.....

JohLegend what are your thoughts??
I agree 100% AMK. The format as well as the combination of dozens and columns gives random too much to do. That wait, that break in the flow of random is the powerpoint of both PATTERN 4 and CODE 4. I see patterns like this all the time.

HLH
HLH
HLH
L L L--Random can run off three of a kind four is usually a bridge too far.

1B3A
1B3A-Random too can duplicate a line far more easily than 12 spins later for CODE 4. In the 140 games I've now played this has happened 4 times. The format is the powerpoint of the method. And covering zero makes it even stronger. Played hit and run its going to take this game to pieces.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 13, 06:22 AM 2011
Joyland Casino
RNG European Wheel

In RED is a win

1   B   1   A
32   11   36   29
29   12   20   19
2   A   3   B
2   32   28   28
28   14   15   36
3   C   1   B
6   15   21   23
21   27   20   1
3   C   2   B
17   10   28   27
26   2   9   7
3   A   2   B
31   16   23   29
26   10   8   22
3   A   2   C


Regards,
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 13, 11:56 AM 2011
Quote from: Juiced91 on Jun 12, 01:13 PM 2011
Hey man. I spin 12 spins then bet the next 4.

1A2B
3C1A
2C3C
1B3C (This is the line I bet on, this line then becomes the first line of the next 12)
2C1A
1B3C
2B3A(Bet this line)

Then I'm done betting for that session.
That's exactly how I'm playing the method juiced with stunning results, update tomorrow. In my opinion overall somehow AMK put together the greatest method I've yet seen. MATRIX VERTICAL 5 can match its strikerate but not certain betting frequency. Very well done again AMK. You came to this forum with an open positive mind and have delivered something here that's going to be huge over the next 4 years. If negative forums like VLS and PUNTERS LOUNGE don't get CODE 4, and realize its potential they should be shut down they are a waste of cyberspace.

In the words of my favourite song we are on a JOURNEY, "Don't Stop Believing"...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 13, 12:18 PM 2011
Joyland Casino
LIVE wheel

In RED is a win

2   A   3   C
2   22   14   26
2   4   5   10
3   B   3   C
21   12   34   6
3   14   29   2
2   C   2   C
5   27   21   23
19   2   33   35
2   C   2   B
7   24   30   29
16   11   34   31
1

Regards,         
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: maestro on Jun 13, 12:26 PM 2011
i am sorry people but my old brain still does not get it...say i have 12 numbers can someone explain how you write matrix please...   //13,14,15// numbers are  35,29,17.thank you in advance ???



29
31
23
19
1
34
7
33
32
2
6
20
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 13, 12:28 PM 2011
Quote from: Maui13 on Jun 13, 12:18 PM 2011
Joyland Casino
LIVE wheel

In RED is a win

2   A   3   C
2   22   14   26
2   4   5   10
3   B   3   C
21   12   34   6
3   14   29   2
2   C   2   C
5   27   21   23
19   2   33   35
2   C   2   B
7   24   30   29
16   11   34   31
1

Regards,         

I recommend two by two Maui13 then shut it down Im hardly seeing bet three doing this.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 13, 01:16 PM 2011
Hi John,

Yup, will do that.  :thumbsup:  Just for the fun of it, I'm playing it 5 games.When I bump my unit sizes up, I'll definitely play it for only +1 or +2 per session. Might even make that per day depending on my unit sizes.

Here another session..

this time RNG again
RED a win

2   C   3   B
10   3   2   36
21   14   8   22
3   C   2   B
9   23   7   1
1   10   8   11
3   A   1   C
20   28   28   24
33   24   29   25
3   B   2   B
16   1   11   19
33   1   20   17
3   C   1   C
35   5   11   10
33   0   21   17
1   C   1   A

Regards,
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 13, 01:27 PM 2011
@ maestro

Here are your numbers... (remember that dozens are numbered 1,2,3 and columns A,B,C!!!)

29 - Dozen 3
31 - Column A
23 - Dozen 2
19 - Column A
1
34
7
33
32
2
6
20

Take a look at the attached JPG, you will now bet against the 3rd dozen forming, so you will be betting dozen 1 & 2
If you lose, you will be betting against column A forming, so you're money will be on B & C.
The progression is (1,3,9,27) x 2

Hope this helps!

Regards, 



Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: maestro on Jun 13, 01:48 PM 2011
thanks maui so you do not spin 12 spin and bet you spin 4 and bet for non hittin same  and when win you just spin to fill say rest of above and spin new 4 spins and bet same way...thanks
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 13, 01:48 PM 2011
Gentelman,

Even if you pull up your nose to RNG, so far, the results are shocking to say the least!!!

Once again, Playtech RNG - less than 5 minute of play!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

RED is a win

2   B   1   A
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
3   A   1   A
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
3   C   3   C
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
2   C   2   B
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
3   C   3   B
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
1   A   2   B

I really think someone should code this into a bot ???  PLEASE!!!
I've also played a bit of a modified progression, on RNG,1-2-3-5-8-11-17-25-40  just in case I was caught of guard with a run, but not yet has it moved past 4th progression. (this progression is also a bit less aggressive and you could use a smaller bankroll to start with)

Regards,

         

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 13, 01:51 PM 2011
Maestro

In total, you need 16 spins (you might already have picked up your win on spin 13) The 16 is the 4 wide matrix complete. the LAST 4 numbers, become your new 4 for the next round.

Regards,
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 13, 02:19 PM 2011
RNG

RED is a win

1   B   3   C
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
1   B   2   A
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
1   A   2   0
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
3   B   3   B
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
3   C   2   C
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
1   B   1   C
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: airvucko on Jun 13, 06:15 PM 2011
So can we form a code4 combination of numbers,right away when we sit on roulette (electonic and real) from backwards in group of four and right away bet on 4 pattern??? Can we form patterns in sessions adding number that came and removing the last number from 12 number combination??? thanks
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 13, 07:15 PM 2011
code 4 is pretty over rated because you can only start at low units. due to the high progression with a 4 matrix. over rated system imo
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 13, 08:19 PM 2011
Hmm You can get lucky with it I guess. I tested code 4 out. it usually works within the 1st or 2nd go mostly. pretty good strike rate. so if you are willing to wager a high sum it can be good. but imagine a loser scenario. It is also a highly time consuming system, needs a tracker. Impossible to be played live -will take forever. each spin takes like a minute and a half or so. you will be waiting over an hour for only a few bets. waiting  spins? who has this sort of time.

1/1,3/3,9/9/,27/27

say you bet $5 a unit.

Total cost of progression is $400. 1 losing combination, will cost you $400. $10 units = $800.

1 session will take approx 60 minutes, and you may only have about 8 bets - about $40.

1 loss will take hours and hours to recoup.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 14, 02:05 AM 2011
@ Halba

Where is the faith ???

I might be wrong here, but I don't think you're playing it right if you are playing a session at 60 mins? 16 Spins, at a spin per minute? That's one session!!! If you take Amk,JL, Juiced,Proofreader and other (including my own stats) CODE 4 is holding up nicely. Show me ANY system, you can safely say, you will never lose....and I'll show you a Tyrannosaurus rex that lives in my backyard.  :wink: 
My point is, all the systems, somewhere in time, you have a loss, but this one together with Matrix 5 , Pattern 4 etc. etc.  if you calculate your win/loss ratio you'll find that making up the losses is actually possible.
Yes, the guys playing 1,3,9,27 are going for the win, because of the good hits, BUT I'm playing it with much less progression.

Remember, each system is as good as you want it to be, together with progression that makes you feel comfortable, this system really isn't that bad at all! Come on, give it a proper shot and then come back and give your opinion.  :thumbsup:

Regards,

PS - Say you bet 1 U$ per unit, you only need a bank of 80 !!!
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 14, 03:11 AM 2011
Quote from: Maui13 on Jun 14, 02:05 AM 2011
@ Halba

Where is the faith ???

I might be wrong here, but I don't think you're playing it right if you are playing a session at 60 mins? 16 Spins, at a spin per minute? That's one session!!! If you take Amk,JL, Juiced,Proofreader and other (including my own stats) CODE 4 is holding up nicely. Show me ANY system, you can safely say, you will never lose....and I'll show you a Tyrannosaurus rex that lives in my backyard.  :wink:  
My point is, all the systems, somewhere in time, you have a loss, but this one together with Matrix 5 , Pattern 4 etc. etc.  if you calculate your win/loss ratio you'll find that making up the losses is actually possible.
Yes, the guys playing 1,3,9,27 are going for the win, because of the good hits, BUT I'm playing it with much less progression.

Remember, each system is as good as you want it to be, together with progression that makes you feel comfortable, this system really isn't that bad at all! Come on, give it a proper shot and then come back and give your opinion.  :thumbsup:

Regards,

PS - Say you bet 1 U$ per unit, you only need a bank of 80 !!!
Good post Maui13, Halba unfortunately is the mindset that keeps the myths about this game alive. REVELATION TIME. This method is TOO GOOD.

I have been testing and playing as follows for the last two days.

1A3C--CODE 1 to oppose GAME 1
2B3A--CODE 2 to oppose GAME 2
1C3B
1B3A--GAME 1 WIN BET 2
1C2B--GAME 2 WIN BET 1

There are no excuses Halba this method is so strong played HIT AND RUN you can play at least two continuos frames as in my example. I recommend five max. Then take a break or hit another table. You need to understand the potential of this method with its certain betting frequency is unmatched. On paper your odds are 80/1. But I'm telling you all here and now, played hit and run that may as well be 800/1. don't be in a hurry to win. didn't anyone ever tell you nobody is supposed to beat this game longterm? This is an amazing method. And beating this game never looked easier or more certain. Everyone should be at least paper testing this gem. Along with PATTERN 4/BREAKER/DIVIDE and CONQUER/MV5 HI LO. The casinos in Europe won't stand a chance.

RESULTS UPDATE

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 160
TOTAL GAMES WON 160
TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 320 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 91
STEP 2 WINS 50
STEP 3 WINS 17
STEP 4 WINS 2

Of the 160 games now completed there have been 11 zeros involved including the two games that took me to step 4. I believe this method is so strong up to five continuos frames, as in my example above can be played I'm staying with 5 sets of two throughout the day. And I believe the strikerate played in that fashion could hit four figures from time to time. PLAY ON PEOPLE, PLAY ON....
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 14, 03:32 AM 2011
Hey guys just wanna let you know gonna play JLs way now to. gonna bet 4th line against 1st and 5th against 2nd. Played a session now. Won on both first bets. remeber its RNG..
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 14, 03:37 AM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jun 14, 03:11 AM 2011

STEP 1 WINS 91
STEP 2 WINS 50
STEP 3 WINS 17
STEP 4 WINS 2



Check, even if you flat bet 1/1,1/1,1/1,1/1, - your first time wins are the most so 91 - 50 -17 -2 = + 22    :twisted:

If put into a tester, flat betting, I would love to see the outcome after say 10 000 spins...just for the hell of it!!!

Thanks for the advice JL - also going to play it like that!!!  :thumbsup:

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 14, 05:10 AM 2011
OK, played it like JL suggested and even pushed it further...

1   A   1   A - First trigger
2   B   2   C - Second trigger
2   B   1   B - Third trigger
3   B   3   C - First bet win, Fourth trigger
2   A   3   A - Second bet, step 2 win
3   A   1   B - Third bet step 1 win
2   A   0   B - Fourth bet, step 1 win - DONE!!!

BEAUTIFUL!!!
:thumbsup: :xd: :twisted: :wink:

EDIT: PS - this was RNG  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ausjase on Jun 14, 05:19 AM 2011
nice results ive been playing on rng and have had similar results i wonder if pushing it to 5 games a session wld b ok and since most win by the 2nd bet wld we need 2 continue to the 3rd bet in the progression just use 1-1,3-3 if tht loses take the 8 point lose and start again
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 14, 05:38 AM 2011
@ ausjase

With a big bankroll, I suppose the progression isn't bad, but I like your idea of only playing 1/1,3/3 because that you can recover easily!

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 14, 06:19 AM 2011
It doesn't get better than this...

RNG + 0 couldn't break me....

LOVE IT LOVE IT LOVE IT!!!

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jun 14, 08:55 AM 2011
This a GREAT system!

Many thanks to amk and JL   ;)

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 14, 10:57 AM 2011
Quote from: Maui13 on Jun 14, 03:37 AM 2011
Check, even if you flat bet 1/1,1/1,1/1,1/1, - your first time wins are the most so 91 - 50 -17 -2 = + 22    :twisted:

If put into a tester, flat betting, I would love to see the outcome after say 10 000 spins...just for the hell of it!!!

Thanks for the advice JL - also going to play it like that!!!  :thumbsup:


The method is strong enough to do this, no more than five times though. It speeds up turnover without compromising the strength of the method. NEVER PLAY ONE LINE UNDER ANOTHER. I have now seen nine repeaters in the 170 games Ive played.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 14, 11:07 AM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Jun 14, 08:55 AM 2011
This a GREAT system!

Many thanks to amk and JL   ;)

A.
Atlantis yes its fantastic, thanks to Amks laser sharp observations. Its good to see you back on here. We have a will travel MATRIX VERTICAL 5 with CODE 4.

And Maui13 says he is killing an RNG with it at present. I will watch his space eagerly. Can CODE 4 finally be the one that overcomes the manmade one. It would be something if it holds up.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 14, 01:51 PM 2011
Juiced, back me up here buddy. Please post EVERY game you play RNG!
Juiced is playing Piggspeak Casino, I'm playing Joyland. Not sure what software Piggspeak is, but Joyland is running Playtech.

Let's see how far this can go.

My latest run...

1   C   2   B
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
1   B   2   C
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
1   B   1   C

DONE... I give it anything from 30 + minutes before I play again.

Regards,

*** I really wish someone could code this into a bot for RNG!!! ***
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jun 14, 01:53 PM 2011
Test on CODE 4 on BVNoZero (rng) today

RESULTS

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 57
TOTAL GAMES WON 57
TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 14, 01:55 PM 2011
@ atlantis

How often do you play then? Having done 57 games?
I mean, you say that you played "today"

Regards,
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jun 14, 02:03 PM 2011
Quote from: Maui13 on Jun 14, 01:55 PM 2011

How often do you play then? Having done 57 games?
I mean, you say that you played "today"


Hi Maui13,
I know it is against the rules but I played *continously* over 240 spins (228+the initial 12 spins)
Suprisingly not one single losing line! (game)
However, I wouldn't advise anyone playing the same way... And I wasn't playing for real money either - only in demo mode. However, I heard it somewhere that it IS genuinely random on that site? When I play it will be on real live table or live autospin.
I just played until I got bored.

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 14, 02:07 PM 2011
Quote from: Maui13 on Jun 14, 01:51 PM 2011
Juiced, back me up here buddy. Please post EVERY game you play RNG!
Juiced is playing Piggspeak Casino, I'm playing Joyland. Not sure what software Piggspeak is, but Joyland is running Playtech.

Let's see how far this can go.

My latest run...

1   C   2   B
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
1   B   2   C
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
1   B   1   C

DONE... I give it anything from 30 + minutes before I play again.

Regards,

*** I really wish someone could code this into a bot for RNG!!! ***

Yeah glad to see its going well for you. I havent been playing that much yesterday or today been super busy but prob around 70 games in total all wins no losses and started today with that new way by JL. No losses at all and been to level 4 once so far and the new way today played 10 games and all won on first bets.

New way could be the best way. Keep it up M..
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 14, 02:15 PM 2011
RNG game.

1B2C (1ST TRIGGER)
3C1C (2ND TRIGGER)
3B3C
3A3B (WON BET 1)
3C1A(WON BET 4)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 14, 02:55 PM 2011
Last session of the evening...

3   C   1   B
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
3   C   2   0 Then the goblin appeared. Had to retrack as I didn't want to risk not having the possibility to bet 4th prog.
X   X   X   X                                                         
X   X   X   X                                                         
2   C   1   B Retrack first 4
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
2   B   2   B

Regards,
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: warrior on Jun 14, 10:03 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 08, 03:15 PM 2011
                                                                CODE 4

CODE 4 is a very simple method which was inspired by JohnLegends PATTERN 4. Its strength comes from combining dozens and columns CODE 4 DC as well as EO and HL CODE 4 EC. EO/HL approach was established by Atlantis...

It should only be played HIT AND RUN....


                                                              CODE 4 DC

Note down the last 12 spins of dozens/columns alternating into 3 groups each 4 wide..

Example:  numbers 1,2,3 are dozens, letters A,B,C are columns

                             2B1C
                             3C2A
                             2C3A
                              .........  fourth pattern


Once we have our 3 groups each 4 wide we are betting that the fourth pattern will be different from the first... In this case we are betting on dozens 1/3 then columns A/C then dozens 2/3 then columns A/B  Playing progression is 1/1, 3/3, 9/9  You can also chose to play 1/1, 3/3, 9/9, 27/27. However as you shall see the strikerate for the first 3 bets is very HIGH...

1600 live Spielbank spins were played consecutively so we have an indication what HIT AND RUN looks like....

385 games played, 279 wins on bet 1, 65 on bet 2, 24 on bet 3, 5 on bet 4, 5 total loses...


                                                              CODE 4 EC

Note down the last 12 spins of EO/HL alternating into 3 groups each 4 wide...

Example:  E O are Even Odd, H L are High Low

                            ELEH
                            OLOH
                            EHOH
                            ......... fourth pattern

Once we have our 3 groups each 4 wide we are betting that the fourth pattern will be different from the first... In this case we are betting OHOL. Playing progression is 1,2,4,8  If a losing game is experienced you can go to level 2 progression 3,6,12,24 for 5 games.....

During 1067 live Spielbank spins played again consecutively so we see how HIT AND RUN will perform.....

240 games played, 123 wins on bet 1, 64 wins on bet 2, 26 wins on bet 3, 14 wins on bet 4, total loses 13.


It will take all of us to perfect these methods. By sharing our data and knowledge we can forge a playing style which can hopefully make life a lot easier for all of us....

I look forward to your feedback and thank you for sharing.......

IN the 1600 live spins how many repeat of 1 line back to back did you have with in a12 spin frame?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 15, 01:01 AM 2011
Back to back, I haven't seen more than 2 in a row....

Example:

1C2B
1C2B
XXXX - Not the same
XXXX

Hope this is what you asked? So in the time that I've been playing, I have not seen more than 2 similar lines. It's bound to happen, but 4 in a row the same, is really pushing random to the edge. Anyone else with different outcomes???

GOod question Warrior!  :thumbsup:

Regards,
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 15, 06:24 AM 2011
Another Quick + 2 RNG

3   C   1   B
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
1   C   3   A
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
3   C   3   C

This literally takes less than 5 minutes to be up 2! With a a nice unit size, I don't think you'll make "quicker" money in your life!!!

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: warrior on Jun 15, 07:37 AM 2011
Quote from: Maui13 on Jun 15, 01:01 AM 2011
Back to back, I haven't seen more than 2 in a row....

Example:

1C2B
1C2B
XXXX - Not the same
XXXX

Hope this is what you asked? So in the time that I've been playing, I have not seen more than 2 similar lines. It's bound to happen, but 4 in a row the same, is really pushing random to the edge. Anyone else with different outcomes???

GOod question Warrior!  :thumbsup:

Regards,
yes that is what i wantd to know .
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 15, 09:45 AM 2011
First Loss

3   C   2   C
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
3   C   2   C


:o :o :o :o

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 15, 10:25 AM 2011
Quote from: Maui13 on Jun 15, 09:45 AM 2011
First Loss

3   C   2   C
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
3   C   2   C


:o :o :o :o



Ish bro unlucky. Im still going luckily...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 15, 10:52 AM 2011
Maui13 please remember that it is RNG and not a LIVE roulette wheel......

It might be better to play 1/1 3/3 9/9 progression this way you can recover a loss more quickly..
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Hermes on Jun 15, 11:07 AM 2011
3   C   1   B
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
1   C   3   A
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
3  C   3   C

maui13,  important are results of many 1000' spins and they are promising. But still it can get a streak of losses after 9 months. Roulette is unpredictable. In that moment you think you are God it shows you are wrong. Happened to me also. The remedy for it is stay humble and thankful all the time.
Hermes

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 15, 12:55 PM 2011
Thanks again for your thought provoking insight Hermes....

If I remember correctly you had a system for double streets which didn't lose for 9 months then the loses happened...

Were you playing HIT AND RUN?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jun 15, 01:08 PM 2011
Hi AMK,

This is my experimental way playing CODE 4 on the EC's (copied from dozens thread - as is more relevant here!)

Some nice results playing this. Playing at BVNoZero rng demo mode.

Record lines of 4 results in order: H/L, O/E, H/L, O/E

Bet opposite EC on vertical line above. Stop at a winner.

Start prog = 1-1-2-2

Reduce to start progression if LEVEL or AHEAD; otherwise adjust progression line accordingly.

HOHO (START AT 1-1-2-2)
LOHO  +1
LEHO  +1
HELO  +2
LELO   +3
LEHE   +3
HOHE  +4
HEHO  +4
HELE   +4
LELE   +5
HOLE   +6
HELE   +6
HEHE   +6
HELE   +6
HELO   +4 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LEHO   +6  (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
LELO    +6
HOLE    +7
HELO   +7
LOLE   +8
HOLE   +9
LOHE  +10
LOHE   +4  (UP TO 3-3-4-4)
HEHO   +7
LEHO   +10 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
HOHE   +11
HOLO   +11
HEHE   +11
LELE    +12
HOLO   +13
HOHE   +13
HOHO   +13
LOLO    +14
LOHE    +14
LOLO     +14
LOLE     +12 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LELE     +13 (DOWN TO TO 2-2-3-3)
HOHE    +14 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
HELE     +14
HELO     +12 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
HOHE     +13 (DOWN TO 2-2-3-3)
LOLO     +15 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
LOLE      +13 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LELO      +14 (DOWN TO 2-2-3-3)
HOLE      +16 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
HEHO      +16
LELO      +17
HEHE      +18
HELE      +18
LELO       +19
LOHO      +19
LOHE      +17 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LOLO       +15 (UP TO 3-4-4-5)
HEHE      +18 (DOWN TO 3-3-4-4)
LEHO      +21 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)

54 games in 220 spins.
PROFIT +21pts.
Highest bet = 3u

So if you like the CODE 4 and MATRIX-type bets EC style - this could be for you! Try it.

A.

PS. You could also try the "every 4th line" mod on this too if desired - but might not be required.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 15, 01:13 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 15, 12:55 PM 2011
Thanks again for your thought provoking insight Hermes....

If I remember correctly you had a system for double streets which didn't lose for 9 months then the loses happened...

Were you playing HIT AND RUN?
There is no way a method should win for nine months then lose if its any good. You will identify the strong points and weak points of a method early. There should be no surprises.

If a rare fluke happens it then becomes a minor setback not a life destroying occurance. Care to share the double street method with me Hermes? Out of interest Id like to see if I can find its flaw without you highlighting it.

A method like CODE 4 is fantastic, in terms of risk, strikerate and betting frequency. Its the best I've yet seen. PLAYED AS I PLAY IT, forget it. I expect winning streaks the right side of 500.

Maui13 no big deal, you lost on an RNG. WE EXPECT IT, just ask TWISTER. Live is the only way we ever know we are winning and losing fairly. Still its done well anyway. This method is a gift if played hit and run and LIVE.

Keep going....
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: viclimks on Jun 15, 01:56 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend link=topic=5848. msg57981#msg57981 date=1308157981
There is no way a method should win for nine months then lose if its any good.   You will identify the strong points and weak points of a method early.   There should be no surprises. 

If a rare fluke happens it then becomes a minor setback not a life destroying occurance.   Care to share the double street method with me Hermes? Out of interest Id like to see if I can find its flaw without you highlighting it. 

A method like CODE 4 is fantastic, in terms of risk, strikerate and betting frequency.   Its the best I've yet seen.   PLAYED AS I PLAY IT, forget it.   I expect winning streaks the right side of 500. 

Maui13 no big deal, you lost on an RNG.   WE EXPECT IT, just ask TWISTER.   Live is the only way we ever know we are winning and losing fairly.   Still its done well anyway.   This method is a gift if played hit and run and LIVE. 

Keep going.  .  .  . 
JL,how many session games of hit n run you play daily?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 15, 02:58 PM 2011
Quote from: viclimks on Jun 15, 01:56 PM 2011
JL,how many session games of hit n run you play daily?

He plays 5 sessions and 2 games per session.  So 10 games and 5 sessions with each game being back to back in a session.

JL im still playing RNG doubled my bank roll and doubled my unit size.

Started on 80units got to 160units playing with 1 unit.
Im now on 192 units and playing with 2 units.

Lost count how many games ive played but prob around 80 games and no losses.. Level 4 twice.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Nickmsi on Jun 15, 03:25 PM 2011
This is an interesting system but I found it difficult to follow at first so I prepared a spreadsheet.   

This 4 wide matrix spreadsheet allows you to enter each number spun and it will place it in the correct section as either  (1st Doz) 2  (2nd Doz) 3  (3rd (Doz) or A  (1st Column)
B (2nd Column) C  (3rd Column).

It is also color coded so you know which lines you are to start betting against.

It also has a maximum of 48 spins so it fits well with the hit and run approach.

Unfortunately, I prepared it with the “Open Office” program so the formulas do not always work when opened with various versions of Microsoft Excel.   Open Office is a free program so you can download it if necessary.

You can change the size of the spreadsheet so that it runs side by side with your RNG casino or I suspect live wheel.

In any event, I can now do some serious testing with ease.

Nick
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: warrior on Jun 15, 03:55 PM 2011
JOHNLEGEND HERMES DOUBLE STREET METHO IS CALLED 6X6 DOUBLE STREET ,its on this forum and vls.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 15, 04:04 PM 2011
Sorry Gents,

I was out for the evening, we have a public holiday tomorrow, so a couple of beers with friends all in order!!!  :thumbsup:

Yes, I had a loss, BUT I'm not crying about it, I knew a loss was bound to happen, yes I knew it was RNG - my point is - Juiced is still going strong (doubled bankroll on RNG), and so was I.

I don't want to get technical, nor do I wish to tell people that I think this system is bulletproof. I am going to continue playing it, as the results are really good, and I think better than many systems out there - SPECIALLY on RNG....I just think, that for RNG, we need to perhaps tweak the progression. So if there are any "Einsteins" out there, please...please...please share your possible progression out over an 8 step, to try and recover. I don't think that a double loss is possible, and I think that someone is going to argue that fact. I want proof, then I'll keep my mouth shut.

For now, CODE 4 is running good on RNG, I just wish more people would help test, or perhaps even put this into a sim to show me, that it does/n't work.

Gents, GAME ON!!!

M
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 15, 04:11 PM 2011
sooo how much did you lose maui???
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 15, 04:19 PM 2011
80 units

May I ask the reason for your concern?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 15, 04:57 PM 2011
Of course, such a statistic needs to be pointed out. you just got bankrolled.  just saw ure pattern it repeated. in my opinion very possible on a cheating RNG.

8 step progression won't work as you will be in loss territory. also the cheating RNG.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 15, 05:18 PM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Jun 15, 01:08 PM 2011
Hi AMK,

This is my experimental way playing CODE 4 on the ECs (copied from dozens thread - as is more relevant here!)

Some nice results playing this. Playing at BVNoZero rng demo mode.

Record lines of 4 results in order: H/L, O/E, H/L, O/E

Bet opposite EC on vertical line above. Stop at a winner.

Start prog = 1-1-2-2

Reduce to start progression if LEVEL or AHEAD; otherwise adjust progression line accordingly.

HOHO (START AT 1-1-2-2)
LOHO  +1
LEHO  +1
HELO  +2
LELO   +3
LEHE   +3
HOHE  +4
HEHO  +4
HELE   +4
LELE   +5
HOLE   +6
HELE   +6
HEHE   +6
HELE   +6
HELO   +4 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LEHO   +6  (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
LELO    +6
HOLE    +7
HELO   +7
LOLE   +8
HOLE   +9
LOHE  +10
LOHE   +4  (UP TO 3-3-4-4)
HEHO   +7
LEHO   +10 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
HOHE   +11
HOLO   +11
HEHE   +11
LELE    +12
HOLO   +13
HOHE   +13
HOHO   +13
LOLO    +14
LOHE    +14
LOLO     +14
LOLE     +12 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LELE     +13 (DOWN TO TO 2-2-3-3)
HOHE    +14 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
HELE     +14
HELO     +12 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
HOHE     +13 (DOWN TO 2-2-3-3)
LOLO     +15 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
LOLE      +13 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LELO      +14 (DOWN TO 2-2-3-3)
HOLE      +16 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
HEHO      +16
LELO      +17
HEHE      +18
HELE      +18
LELO       +19
LOHO      +19
LOHE      +17 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LOLO       +15 (UP TO 3-4-4-5)
HEHE      +18 (DOWN TO 3-3-4-4)
LEHO      +21 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)

54 games in 220 spins.
PROFIT +21pts.
Highest bet = 3u

So if you like the CODE 4 and MATRIX-type bets EC style - this could be for you! Try it.

A.

PS. You could also try the "every 4th line" mod on this too if desired - but might not be required.


finallllyyyyy. someone has awoken to the fallacy of playing CODE 4 with a progression. maui's 1 loss scared the jeepers out  of me. Maui which casino you playing. I heard it is joyland. it is owned by william hill. I was on william hill last week rng, and my bets kept getting cheated. I wouldn't touch joyland.

Now atlantis has developed a solid method which is 21 units ahead. Because of the safety, you can play with high units than $1. 21 units * $15 a unit.

definitely atlantis one should be played on BV no zero due to flattish progression. the progression - its really fantastic. either you win in the first 2 or you stay even or so. a repeater will give a loss, but recovery progression next lot.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 15, 05:34 PM 2011
Hello Atlantis,

Your method of play is great...

Will do more research myself....

Halba1... why should we trust BV RNG?.....

LIVE wheel involves "physics"...RNG is computerized.......................


Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 15, 05:56 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 15, 05:34 PM 2011
Hello Atlantis,

Your method of play is great...

Will do more research myself....

Halba1... why should we trust BV RNG?.....

LIVE wheel involves "physics"...RNG is computerized.......................




should trust BV RNG. it is the best of all. very fair. it also has no zero, so You can't lose much.

live wheel how long can we sit down. 220 spins. requires a lot of concentration?

anyway I tested atlantis system on Casino tropez(playtech RNG REAL MODE)

playtech notorious for hard to break.

here is the results= I didn't bet

$10 units

HOHE
LOHE +$10
LEHO +$10
HOLE +$20
LOLO +$30
HEHE +$40

.......up $40. mostly hit on the first letter. basically up 4 units. consistent with atlantis, this system is worth a separate thread it is different to code 4.

on a zero wheel, make sure you place some insurance money on the zero when @ later stages in progression. e.g. if you are betting $70 or so, place $2 on zero.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 15, 07:43 PM 2011
Maui

better progression for you - obviously round units up as per $ value

0.5/0.5,1.15/1.15, 3.4/3.4,10/10

total at risk - 30 units.

play each line immediately below. no need code 4. should make +20 units a session. time to recover 1 loss will only be 1 session.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: viclimks on Jun 15, 09:31 PM 2011
Quote from: amk link=topic=5848. msg58040#msg58040 date=1308173696
Hello Atlantis,

Your method of play is great.   .   .   

Will do more research myself.   .   .   .   

Halba1.   .   .    why should we trust BV RNG?.   .   .   .   .   

LIVE wheel involves "physics".   .   .   RNG is computerized.   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   



amk,thanks for your system,may I ask are you on live wheels,live casino or rng?do you play continously till you hit your target?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Hermes on Jun 16, 12:31 AM 2011
I would like to give you LG the 6x6 DS it is good system only the progression must be solved. I have to find it where it is mixed with the Forex stuff. Huge library.
But it is on the old VLS forum somewhere.
I give you another excellent system to think about The Figures which are the natural law of roulette.

LIVE wheel involves "physics".   .   .   RNG is computerized - that's very true! Live wheel obey the natural laws where RNG is man made without a laws. The only law is rip off.
Halba is right with the Casino Tropez those jerks screwed up all my testings. Difficult to win there.
Cheers Hermes
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 16, 01:27 AM 2011
Quote from: viclimks on Jun 15, 01:56 PM 2011
JL,how many session games of hit n run you play daily?
I play five sets of two viclimks.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 16, 01:32 AM 2011
Quote from: warrior on Jun 15, 03:55 PM 2011
JOHNLEGEND HERMES DOUBLE STREET METHO IS CALLED 6X6 DOUBLE STREET ,its on this forum and VLS.
Thanks Warrior, I will analyze it.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 16, 01:45 AM 2011
Quote from: Hermes on Jun 16, 12:31 AM 2011
I would like to give you LG the 6x6 DS it is good system only the progression must be solved. I have to find it where it is mixed with the Forex stuff. Huge library.
But it is on the old VLS forum somewhere.
I give you another excellent system to think about The Figures which are the natural law of roulette.

LIVE wheel involves "physics".   .   .   RNG is computerized - that's very true! Live wheel obey the natural laws where RNG is man made without a laws. The only law is rip off.
Halba is right with the Casino Tropez those jerks screwed up all my testings. Difficult to win there.
Cheers Hermes

yes live roulette okay. how many spins per hour, probably 60 spins per hour only on smartlive. but very natural results.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Playborne on Jun 16, 04:15 AM 2011
Quote from: Juiced91 on Jun 09, 02:06 AM 2011
Why do you bet so many times??

As far as I know if you win the first bet you virtual spin the rest? not bet on all patterns.

I. e

2A3B
3B1A
2B1A

Now we best against the 2nd dozen if win we virtual spin the rest and start again, if we lost the bet, bet against column A.  I don't beleive we bet aganst them all.

Its like pattern 4.

Maybe someone can clear this Up?

D

very good indeed ;) will try it out as well ;)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 16, 05:41 AM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Jun 15, 01:08 PM 2011
Hi AMK,

This is my experimental way playing CODE 4 on the ECs (copied from dozens thread - as is more relevant here!)

Some nice results playing this. Playing at BVNoZero rng demo mode.

Record lines of 4 results in order: H/L, O/E, H/L, O/E

Bet opposite EC on vertical line above. Stop at a winner.

Start prog = 1-1-2-2

Reduce to start progression if LEVEL or AHEAD; otherwise adjust progression line accordingly.

HOHO (START AT 1-1-2-2)
LOHO  +1
LEHO  +1
HELO  +2
LELO   +3
LEHE   +3
HOHE  +4
HEHO  +4
HELE   +4
LELE   +5
HOLE   +6
HELE   +6
HEHE   +6
HELE   +6
HELO   +4 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LEHO   +6  (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
LELO    +6
HOLE    +7
HELO   +7
LOLE   +8
HOLE   +9
LOHE  +10
LOHE   +4  (UP TO 3-3-4-4)

HEHO   +7
LEHO   +10 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
HOHE   +11
HOLO   +11
HEHE   +11
LELE    +12
HOLO   +13
HOHE   +13
HOHO   +13
LOLO    +14
LOHE    +14
LOLO     +14
LOLE     +12 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LELE     +13 (DOWN TO TO 2-2-3-3)
HOHE    +14 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
HELE     +14
HELO     +12 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
HOHE     +13 (DOWN TO 2-2-3-3)
LOLO     +15 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
LOLE      +13 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LELO      +14 (DOWN TO 2-2-3-3)
HOLE      +16 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
HEHO      +16
LELO      +17
HEHE      +18
HELE      +18
LELO       +19
LOHO      +19
LOHE      +17 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LOLO       +15 (UP TO 3-4-4-5)
HEHE      +18 (DOWN TO 3-3-4-4)
LEHO      +21 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)

54 games in 220 spins.
PROFIT +21pts.
Highest bet = 3u

So if you like the CODE 4 and MATRIX-type bets EC style - this could be for you! Try it.

A.

PS. You could also try the "every 4th line" mod on this too if desired - but might not be required.

hi atlantis and all. I notice there is a repeat above, which result in loss of -6 units. there is only 1 repeat. we an expect, with 16 combos, that there might be a 'repeat demon' stuck in there.

so my point is, after the repeater, go in HARD with martingale. go with full force, it won't be a triple. bet 5,10,20,40 units on the sucker.


also after the repeat hits, up your bets to 3,5,11,20 level for about 3 games until wins then move back to 1,1,2,2 or 2,3,3,4 for a few games. most of the profit can be made here.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jun 16, 06:42 AM 2011
Quote from: Halba1 on Jun 16, 05:41 AM 2011
hi atlantis and all. I notice there is a repeat above, which result in loss of -6 units. there is only 1 repeat. we an expect, with 16 combos, that there might be a 'repeat demon' stuck in there.

so my point is, after the repeater, go in HARD with martingale. go with full force, it won't be a triple. bet 5,10,20,40 units on the sucker.


also after the repeat hits, up your bets to 3,5,11,20 level for about 3 games until wins then move back to 1,1,2,2 or 2,3,3,4 for a few games. most of the profit can be made here.

Hi Halba1,
Increase bets and use a marty after a repeat line... This seems like good idea to me to claw back some units!  8)

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: monaco on Jun 16, 08:15 AM 2011
i dont want to take over the traditional code 4 methodology here, but i tried Atlantis' version (as far as i could understand - perhaps someone could point out if i did it wrong)
live Latvian dealers..

LOHO (1-1-2-2)
LOLE 0
LOLE -6 (can you believe it?? 1st time i try it!!) (up to 3-3-4-4)
LOHO -8 (up to 3-4-4-5)
LEHE -7
HOLE -4 (down to 3-3-4-4)
HEHO -4
HEHE -10 (up to 5-5-6-6)
LELE -5
LEHE -9 (up to 5-6-6-7)
HEHE -4 (down to 5-5-6-6)
LELE +1 (down to 1-1-2-2)
LOHE +1
LOLE +1
H### +2

+2 units, terrible start..
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 16, 01:37 PM 2011
Hello everybody...

Sorry to take your attention away from CODE 4 for just a second....

I posted a new developing method called DS4 in the testing zone...

Just wanted to receive your feedback....


viclimks, only play live wheel and follow JohnLegends advice....
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 16, 04:10 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 16, 01:37 PM 2011
Hello everybody...

Sorry to take your attention away from CODE 4 for just a second....

I posted a new developing method called DS4 in the testing zone...

Just wanted to receive your feedback....


viclimks, only play live wheel and follow JohnLegends advice....
Hey dont put it all on me this your baby AMK. Nice baby though' Im almost 200 no loss update tommorow. TELL YOU ALL SOMETHING THOUGH. Do not GET GREEDY, I play for two wins then im done. If I had played for 5 today I would have lost, So the hit and run is the power play of this method it will keep that streak going on an on.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 16, 06:14 PM 2011
Quote from: monaco on Jun 16, 08:15 AM 2011
I don't want to take over the traditional code 4 methodology here, but I tried Atlantis' version (as far as I could understand - perhaps someone could point out if I did it wrong)
live Latvian dealers..

LOHO (1-1-2-2)
LOLE 0
LOLE -6 (can you believe it?? 1st time I try it!!) (up to 3-3-4-4)
LOHO -8 (up to 3-4-4-5)
LEHE -7
HOLE -4 (down to 3-3-4-4)
HEHO -4
HEHE -10 (up to 5-5-6-6)
LELE -5
LEHE -9 (up to 5-6-6-7)
HEHE -4 (down to 5-5-6-6)
LELE +1 (down to 1-1-2-2)
LOHE +1
LOLE +1
H### +2

+2 units, terrible start..


hello. not directly comparable. atlantis tried it on a non-zero roulette wheel on betvoyager(which has almost NIL house edge). not sure if you any zeroes, but that's much worse results. In bold I suggest you go to 3,6,12,24 units to make sure you recover better and higher progression  for 4-5 games. then back down to 1,1,2,2 after about 4-5 games.

do that and tell me what result you get on the above. if you did that, you would be 8-9 units or so.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: monaco on Jun 17, 05:20 AM 2011
Quote from: Halba1 on Jun 16, 06:14 PM 2011
hello. not directly comparable. atlantis tried it on a non-zero roulette wheel on betvoyager(which has almost NIL house edge). not sure if you any zeroes, but that's much worse results. In bold I suggest you go to 3,6,12,24 units to make sure you recover better and higher progression  for 4-5 games. then back down to 1,1,2,2 after about 4-5 games.

do that and tell me what result you get on the above. if you did that, you would be 8-9 units or so.


Hi Halba, was played on European table, but no zeros appeared.
This is how it would’ve looked going to your marty 3-6-12-24 for only 2 rounds, immediately getting back the lost 6 units..
(the ‘terrible start’ was a reference to my own bad luck by the way, I actually thought the flattish progression dealt very well with it)

LOHO (1-1-2-2)
LOLE 0
LOLE -6 (up to 3-6-12-24)
LOHO -3
LEHE 0 (down to 1-1-2-2)
HOLE +1
HEHO +1
HEHE -1 (up to 2-3-3-4)
LELE +1 (down to 1-1-2-2)
LEHE +1
HEHE +2
LELE +3
LOHE +3
LOLE +3
H### +4u

Biggest bet 12u

I’ve played it a couple of times since to a profit of +2u both times, much quicker than the above.
One of its best aspects for me is the flatter betting does allow for a bigger base unit relative to BR.

I do like this & think maybe it warrants its own thread in order to not distract from the original Code4, but i'll leave that to you & Atlantis to decide.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 17, 06:19 AM 2011
Quote from: monaco on Jun 17, 05:20 AM 2011

Hi Halba, was played on European table, but no zeros appeared.
This is how it would’ve looked going to your marty 3-6-12-24 for only 2 rounds, immediately getting back the lost 6 units..
(the ‘terrible start’ was a reference to my own bad luck by the way, I actually thought the flattish progression dealt very well with it)

LOHO (1-1-2-2)
LOLE 0
LOLE -6 (up to 3-6-12-24)
LOHO -3
LEHE 0 (down to 1-1-2-2)
HOLE +1
HEHO +1
HEHE -1 (up to 2-3-3-4)
LELE +1 (down to 1-1-2-2)
LEHE +1
HEHE +2
LELE +3
LOHE +3
LOLE +3
H### +4u

Biggest bet 12u

I’ve played it a couple of times since to a profit of +2u both times, much quicker than the above.
One of its best aspects for me is the flatter betting does allow for a bigger base unit relative to BR.

I do like this & think maybe it warrants its own thread in order to not distract from the original Code4, but i'll leave that to you & Atlantis to decide.

hello. i will put up a separate thread with credit to atlantis.

even a few units +VE is all we need to make income my friend. This is because it is flat bet, and not growing exponentially. Please see my thread in the other topic forum on baccarat. it is a similar grinding system like this one, also +3 units, but a nice grind.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: viclimks on Jun 17, 07:11 AM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend link=topic=5848. msg58306#msg58306 date=1308255024
Hey don't put it all on me this your baby AMK.   Nice baby though' I'm almost 200 no loss update tommorow.   TELL YOU ALL SOMETHING THOUGH.   Do not GET GREEDY, I play for two wins then I'm done.   If I had played for 5 today I would have lost, So the hit and run is the power play of this method it will keep that streak going on an on. 
JL,how do you play  the 2 win.  .  .  .  .  .  retrack another 12games or just play on the 5line.  .  .  can you.  guide me?TQ
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 17, 12:47 PM 2011
Quote from: viclimks on Jun 17, 07:11 AM 2011
JL,how do you play  the 2 win.  .  .  .  .  .  retrack another 12games or just play on the 5line.  .  .  can you.  guide me?TQ
I play like this,

1A3B--CODE 1 FOR GAME 1
2A2A--CODE 2 FOR GAME 2
1B3C-------------------------VIRTUAL LINE BETWEEN TRIGGERS AND GAMES
1A2C--GAME 1 WIN BET 3
3B1C--GAME 2 WIN BET 1

And then shut it down session over. I do this 5 times a day Viclimks for a total of 10 games a day and it works very nicely. ;D
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: viclimks on Jun 17, 01:02 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend link=topic=5848. msg58480#msg58480 date=1308329223
I play like this,

1A3B--CODE 1 FOR GAME 1
2A2A--CODE 2 FOR GAME 2
1B3C-------------------------VIRTUAL LINE BETWEEN TRIGGERS AND GAMES
1A2C--GAME 1 WIN BET 3
3B1C--GAME 2 WIN BET 1

And then shut it down session over.  I do this 5 times a day Viclimks for a total of 10 games a day and it works very nicely.  ;D
Tq JL,may i ask if i m playing in a live casino after 2 wins can i straight away change table n retrack 12 new rounds.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 17, 01:09 PM 2011
Quote from: viclimks on Jun 17, 01:02 PM 2011
Tq JL,may I ask if I m playing in a live casino after 2 wins can I straight away change table n retrack 12 new rounds.
Of course. You could even wait for say 7 spins and start a new session on the same wheel. The idea I am trying to get across here is you must BREAK THE SEQUENCE. By that I mean when you are playing consecutive games you are on a track. That track is ultimately leading to a losing game at some point. YOU MUST RETRACK to avoid collision. And by throwing yourself out of sequence you will do just that.

Make no mistake about it. If you stay on the track TOO LONG, even CODE 4 will lose. I saw a losing line yesterday. BUT, it was three lines under the point my two game session ended. I play HIT AND RUN for a reason people. IT WORKS, of course I would stay there all day playing continuosly if I knew I could profit. I KNOW I CANNOT. And you must learn this too. You cannot beat this game in the longrun if you play the way CASINOS WANT YOU TO PLAY.

ALL NIGHT LONG. But we are not following their rules. A good method played HIT AND RUN becomes A GREAT METHOD.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on Jun 17, 01:35 PM 2011
Hit and run question.  Let's say I get a win and the casino has two seperate roulette wheels.  Could I immediately start a new session on the other wheel then when I win on that wheel come back to the first wheel.  (Dublinbet for instance has two roulette wheels.)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 17, 01:44 PM 2011
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on Jun 17, 01:35 PM 2011
Hit and run question.  Let's say I get a win and the casino has two separate roulette wheels.  Could I immediately start a new session on the other wheel then when I win on that wheel come back to the first wheel.  (Dublinbet for instance has two roulette wheels.)
Of course Proof, but even hit and run has a limit. Play it TOO OFTEN in a calendar day and it will lose its effectiveness. Can you understand what I am saying? I choose to play all my methods for a maximum of 10 games a day. That is because it works for me. And I am not pushing the limits.

I already know what most of you lack. I dont even have to say that word anymore. Your posts say it for me. But you all wonder how I defy the odds and results of other members. Its because of how I play and nothing else. You play the same you will enjoy the same strikerate and longterm success, I assure you of that.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 17, 02:36 PM 2011
Thanks JohnLegend......

I don't think my problem is patience, I love to create roulette methods :)  .......

Got one now using double streets in MATRIX VERTICAL 5 formation....

Odds say it has to be in MV5 range, we only have a two step progression available....

Total units 30,  win per game = 1 unit

I'll start a thread for it....



CODE 4 played LIVE wheel shows a great trend....

Applying JL's style of play will lead us in the right direction......



Hope Twisteruk will join us and Scoobydoo.... 
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 17, 03:14 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 17, 02:36 PM 2011
Thanks JohnLegend......

I don't think my problem is patience, I love to create roulette methods :)  .......

Got one now using double streets in MATRIX VERTICAL 5 formation....

Odds say it has to be in MV5 range, we only have a two step progression available....

Total units 30,  win per game = 1 unit

I'll start a thread for it....



CODE 4 played LIVE wheel shows a great trend....

Applying JL's style of play will lead us in the right direction......



Hope Twisteruk will join us and Scoobydoo.... 
It will, well you came up with something extra special with CODE 4 AMK. I spoke to Twister yesterday,'I think he is just laying low while he tries to recover. Scooby I dont know where he is. I will PM him see if he comes back. He has been a real contributor om the forum. And given us one of the best ever methods with DIVIDE AND CONQUER.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jun 17, 03:19 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend link=topic=5848. msg58489#msg58489 date=1308332691
I choose to play all my methods for a maximum of 10 games a day. 
But you all wonder how I defy the odds and results of other members.  Its because of how I play and nothing else.  You play the same you will enjoy the same strikerate and longterm success, I assure you of that.

Ride That Positive Wave Lucky Surfer!
;D
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 17, 03:28 PM 2011
Quote from: ZeroBlue on Jun 17, 03:19 PM 2011
Ride That Positive Wave Lucky Surfer!
;D


yeah a good method, but overall concerned re: exposure , obviously you have to play hit and run, and most of the wins come within the first 1-3 spin out of the 4 spins in the code.

exposure is 27x2 at the max progression. that's 54 units at the top. IF you are playing hit and run with say $10 units to be effective(JL?), your exposure at the top is $540 at the 4th progression. just ask yourself if that happened, would you be playing like that with real money?? what if its a bad day and the zero came in??

thats why i prefer baccarat, or ECs, or ECs on the non-zero wheel at BV.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: viclimks on Jun 17, 03:50 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend link=topic=5848. msg58489#msg58489 date=1308332691
Of course Proof, but even hit and run has a limit.  Play it TOO OFTEN in a calendar day and it will lose its effectiveness.  Can you understand what I am saying? I choose to play all my methods for a maximum of 10 games a day.  That is because it works for me.  And I am not pushing the limits. 

I already know what most of you lack.  I don't even have to say that word anymore.  Your posts say it for me.  But you all wonder how I defy the odds and results of other members.  Its because of how I play and nothing else.  You play the same you will enjoy the same strikerate and longterm success, I assure you of that.
JL,wat if 0 comes by. . . . . while tracking
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 17, 04:04 PM 2011
Quote from: viclimks on Jun 17, 03:50 PM 2011
JL,wat if 0 comes by. . . . . while tracking

i am not JL. but track the zero and ignore that letter when betting i.e. skip it when trying to bet against it. e.g. betting against 103B:

103B
***

1(loss), Free spin(zero), then bet 2 &4 with 3x progression..



Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 17, 04:18 PM 2011
Quote from: viclimks link=topic=5848.msg58502#msg58502 date=130834025
JL,wat if 0 comes by. . . . . while tracking
/quote]Depends where it is Viclimks, if its in the CODE im prosposing to oppose that line is a no play. If its in the virtual line between CODE and GAME. I actually welcome it. The chances are it means it wont show up againg in my realtime play.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Jun 17, 04:26 PM 2011
@ Everyone testing/playing CODE 4

I don't know how, but for some reason this makes sense, but at the same time it also doesn't  ???

Take the attached JPG, play Code 4 as normal, BUT take your 1,2,3 and your A,B,C from the provided JPG. So instead of looking at the numbers on the board of the roulette table, take it from the picture, but play it accordingly.(by the way, the picture was taken of this forum, so thanks to the creator)

Let me give and example:

5
31
28
27
3
5
19
16
20
29
20
32
32
7
33
23


So the matrix will look like this, using the attached JPG

2   B   3   B
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
1   A   2   B


Call me stupid, but there is just something about this way!!!
Anyway, just had to put it down before I go to bed.


Am I going crazy...?  :o


Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: viclimks on Jun 17, 04:37 PM 2011
Quote from: amk link=topic=5848. msg58492#msg58492 date=1308335789
Thanks JohnLegend. . . . . .

I don't think my problem is patience, I love to create roulette methods :)  . . . . . . .

Got one now using double streets in MATRIX VERTICAL 5 formation. . . .

Odds say it has to be in MV5 range, we only have a two step progression available. . . .

Total units 30,  win per game = 1 unit

I'll start a thread for it. . . . 



CODE 4 played LIVE wheel shows a great trend. . . .

Applying JL's style of play will lead us in the right direction. . . . . .



Hope Twisteruk will join us and Scoobydoo. . . .  
i m joining in. . . . . . hit n run. . . . . . +2units per session. . . . . . will play exactly what JL play.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 17, 05:15 PM 2011
hmm very odd maui
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 17, 05:23 PM 2011
Quote from: Maui13 on Jun 17, 04:26 PM 2011
@ Everyone testing/playing CODE 4

I don't know how, but for some reason this makes sense, but at the same time it also doesn't  ???

Take the attached JPG, play Code 4 as normal, BUT take your 1,2,3 and your A,B,C from the provided JPG. So instead of looking at the numbers on the board of the roulette table, take it from the picture, but play it accordingly.(by the way, the picture was taken of this forum, so thanks to the creator)

Let me give and example:

5
31
28
27
3
5
19
16
20
29
20
32
32
7
33
23


So the matrix will look like this, using the attached JPG

2   B   3   B
X   X   X   X
X   X   X   X
1   A   2   B


Call me silly, but there is just something about this way!!!
Anyway, just had to put it down before I go to bed.


Am I going crazy...?  :o




Halba do you not like Maui or what? i feel that from you sometimes. maybe explain your reasoning and it wouldnt seem to negative.

I for one on the other hand or seem to like it. I dont know why but it just seems like a different way to beat random by using a totally random wheel/table combination.

I think its interesting. maybe a test is in order.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 17, 10:32 PM 2011
Quote from: Juiced91 on Jun 17, 05:23 PM 2011
Halba do you not like Maui or what? I feel that from you sometimes. maybe explain your reasoning and it wouldnt seem to negative.

I for one on the other hand or seem to like it. I don't know why but it just seems like a different way to beat random by using a totally random wheel/table combination.

I think its interesting. maybe a test is in order.



actually maui and i get along well(see our PMs). no problem. its all good.

code 4 is good hit and run, mostly within the first two bets. just remember to CLOSE your eyes when you get to the 4th stage progression(27x2 units) after the inevitable zero lands, or when you bet wrong,.


Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 18, 05:53 AM 2011
Quote from: Halba1 on Jun 17, 10:32 PM 2011
actually maui and I get along well(see our PMs). no problem. its all good.

code 4 is good hit and run, mostly within the first two bets. just remember to CLOSE your eyes when you get to the 4th stage progression(27x2 units) after the inevitable zero lands, or when you bet wrong,.



Halba I can understand your concern about the progression. The only question that must be anwsered is. Is that 80 unit risk WORTH IT. At present I have to say YES. If its to much risk for you theres no reason you cant play the first three steps is there? With a 26 units risk.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 18, 05:58 AM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Jun 15, 01:08 PM 2011
Hi AMK,

This is my experimental way playing CODE 4 on the ECs (copied from dozens thread - as is more relevant here!)

Some nice results playing this. Playing at BVNoZero rng demo mode.

Record lines of 4 results in order: H/L, O/E, H/L, O/E

Bet opposite EC on vertical line above. Stop at a winner.

Start prog = 1-1-2-2

Reduce to start progression if LEVEL or AHEAD; otherwise adjust progression line accordingly.

HOHO (START AT 1-1-2-2)
LOHO  +1
LEHO  +1
HELO  +2
LELO   +3
LEHE   +3
HOHE  +4
HEHO  +4
HELE   +4
LELE   +5
HOLE   +6
HELE   +6
HEHE   +6
HELE   +6
HELO   +4 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LEHO   +6  (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
LELO    +6
HOLE    +7
HELO   +7
LOLE   +8
HOLE   +9
LOHE  +10
LOHE   +4  (UP TO 3-3-4-4)
HEHO   +7
LEHO   +10 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
HOHE   +11
HOLO   +11
HEHE   +11
LELE    +12
HOLO   +13
HOHE   +13
HOHO   +13
LOLO    +14
LOHE    +14
LOLO     +14
LOLE     +12 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LELE     +13 (DOWN TO TO 2-2-3-3)
HOHE    +14 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
HELE     +14
HELO     +12 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
HOHE     +13 (DOWN TO 2-2-3-3)
LOLO     +15 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
LOLE      +13 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LELO      +14 (DOWN TO 2-2-3-3)
HOLE      +16 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
HEHO      +16
LELO      +17
HEHE      +18
HELE      +18
LELO       +19
LOHO      +19
LOHE      +17 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LOLO       +15 (UP TO 3-4-4-5)
HEHE      +18 (DOWN TO 3-3-4-4)
LEHO      +21 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)

54 games in 220 spins.
PROFIT +21pts.
Highest bet = 3u

So if you like the CODE 4 and MATRIX-type bets EC style - this could be for you! Try it.

A.

PS. You could also try the "every 4th line" mod on this too if desired - but might not be required.
Brilliant adaption for the Even chances Atlantis. I will try this way too. I used to bet against HIGH AND LOW only in this fashsion. And even with a single even chance you could win 30 consecutive games with a 15 unit risk. So this is appealing. Again played HIT AND RUN it will extend, extend, extend winning streaks...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 18, 06:17 AM 2011
CODE 4 RESULTS UPDATE 18/06/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 200
TOTAL GAMES WON 200
TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 400 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 107
STEP 2 WINS 69
STEP 3 WINS 22
STEP 4 WINS 2

This method is still in its early stages. But I believe played as I play it in two game hit and run cycles. It is incredible. I hear negative concerned talk from the likes of Halba. Oh what will you do when you finally hit that loss? WELL! I will take it like a man Halba. Here is the deal. We know this can lose, even MATRIX VERTICAL 5 can lose. The question is. AND THIS IS THE ONLY QUESTION THAT NEEDS ANWSERING EVER. Concerning any method.

How many times will it lose in relation to how many times IT WINS! I already feel this method is a will travel MATRIX VERTICAL 5. By that I mean it can be played in a REAL CASINO. Whereas MV5 doesn't have the turnover to be practical in that environment. I expect it to win at least 200 times to every loss. That means I am pocketing 120 POINTS to every 80 I lose at the worst.

The exciting thing is played as I do WE JUST don't KNOW what strikerate will be possible. I could be on here at xmas WITH STILL a 100% strikerate. Will Halba be so nervous then? Probably. But that's why I have no concern. Its already achieved my minumum expectancy. Now lets see how far I can go. Like I said before if PATTERN 4/BREAKER can achieve winning streaks in the 30s played HIT AND RUN when on paper it has expected odds of 7/1. Imagine what is possible with a method that has odds on paper of 80/1

I know when risking 80 units is justified Halba. And so should you. So on we go...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 18, 01:45 PM 2011
JohnLegend,

I now have a 3 step progression which covers the zero on each bet...

You mentioned that the 2 times you were taken to the 4rth bet it was due to the zero....

I think if you covered your first three bets or just the last two it would give you a greater edge..

It's only a minor adjustment to your betting progression....
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 18, 02:03 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 18, 01:45 PM 2011
JohnLegend,

I now have a 3 step progression which covers the zero on each bet...

You mentioned that the 2 times you were taken to the 4rth bet it was due to the zero....

I think if you covered your first three bets or just the last two it would give you a greater edge..

It's only a minor adjustment to your betting progression....
You are right AMK but you know something?  Im not even worried by the Zero I had one Zero in my last 40 games. This methid is so good played HIT AND RUN for two games a session. I may have to give random a chance and start playing *4* games a session five times a day for a total of 20 games.

What I alway do Amk is record three more lines under my two played games each session just to see hot CODE 4 HOLDS UP over that range. So I have 200 games played but 500 games recorded. THERE IS ONLY ONE LOSS IN THOSE 500 GAMES. Thats how good CODE 4 is. And the losss came in a fifth game and contained a ZERO. If I reach 400 played games without loss. I will start playing 20 games a day instead of 10.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 18, 02:59 PM 2011
Hello JOHN LEGEND phenomenal results on BV RNG REAL PLAY(continuous 20 mins).

CODE 4 played, on each LETTER not just a ROW

total units +15units

no loss.

i am playing for real now.

starting with 30c units. no zero.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Twisteruk on Jun 18, 03:21 PM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Jun 15, 01:08 PM 2011
Hi AMK,

This is my experimental way playing CODE 4 on the ECs (copied from dozens thread - as is more relevant here!)

Some nice results playing this. Playing at BVNoZero rng demo mode.

Record lines of 4 results in order: H/L, O/E, H/L, O/E

Bet opposite EC on vertical line above. Stop at a winner.

Start prog = 1-1-2-2

Reduce to start progression if LEVEL or AHEAD; otherwise adjust progression line accordingly.

HOHO (START AT 1-1-2-2)
LOHO  +1
LEHO  +1
HELO  +2
LELO   +3
LEHE   +3
HOHE  +4
HEHO  +4
HELE   +4
LELE   +5
HOLE   +6
HELE   +6
HEHE   +6
HELE   +6
HELO   +4 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LEHO   +6  (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
LELO    +6
HOLE    +7
HELO   +7
LOLE   +8
HOLE   +9
LOHE  +10
LOHE   +4  (UP TO 3-3-4-4)
HEHO   +7
LEHO   +10 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
HOHE   +11
HOLO   +11
HEHE   +11
LELE    +12
HOLO   +13
HOHE   +13
HOHO   +13
LOLO    +14
LOHE    +14
LOLO     +14
LOLE     +12 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LELE     +13 (DOWN TO TO 2-2-3-3)
HOHE    +14 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
HELE     +14
HELO     +12 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
HOHE     +13 (DOWN TO 2-2-3-3)
LOLO     +15 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
LOLE      +13 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LELO      +14 (DOWN TO 2-2-3-3)
HOLE      +16 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
HEHO      +16
LELO      +17
HEHE      +18
HELE      +18
LELO       +19
LOHO      +19
LOHE      +17 (UP TO 2-3-3-4)
LOLO       +15 (UP TO 3-4-4-5)
HEHE      +18 (DOWN TO 3-3-4-4)
LEHO      +21 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)

54 games in 220 spins.
PROFIT +21pts.
Highest bet = 3u

So if you like the CODE 4 and MATRIX-type bets EC style - this could be for you! Try it.

A.

PS. You could also try the "every 4th line" mod on this too if desired - but might not be required.


Okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo far out of the Loop its UNreal !!!!!

What with one thing and another  ::)

Anyhoooo I likes the look of A's version (does it have its own thread ?)

Will Test 2morrow !
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: strato1985 on Jun 18, 03:44 PM 2011
same as twister .  i try to just keep up with this great forum but i'm so busy at the min.

i'm 80 units up on p4 not played for at least a week . pound units


amk congratulations on you find your moving towards legendary gold member status!


should have more time to test next week . saying that paddy power only has min of 1 pound stakes which makes this hard for me i've got 100 units
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Twisteruk on Jun 18, 04:14 PM 2011
@ Atlantis

Have you played for Real Money at BV yet ?


If so, how do the results compare to Demo Mode ?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jun 18, 04:25 PM 2011
Quote from: Twisteruk on Jun 18, 04:14 PM 2011
@ Atlantis

Have you played for Real Money at BV yet ?

If so, how do the results compare to Demo Mode ?

Hi Twister,
I have not played for real money yet there so do not know if any difference. If it is as random as they say with the random seed thing - then should be no difference??
Anyway, here is my latest session in demo mode at BVNoZero and how I staked it:

HOHE (START @ 1-1-2-2)
LOHE  +1
LELO   +1
HOHO  +2
LEHE   +3
HEHO   +4
HOHE   +4
HOLE   +4
LOLO   +5
HOHE  +6
HOHE   +2 (UP TO 3-3-4-4) *lost all 4 bets here due to line repeat
HEHO   +2
HELE    +0 (UP TO 4-4-5-5)
HOHE   +0
LELE     +4 (DOWN TO 2-2-3-3)
HOLE    +6 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
LOLO    +7
HXXX     +8

72 SPINS. 17 GAMES. +8 pts

I thought it safer to not use a marty for quick recovery after a repeat line - but instead preferred more gradual recovery and I would advise others to do same. You never know if/when disaster could strike!

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Twisteruk on Jun 18, 04:38 PM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Jun 18, 04:25 PM 2011
Hi Twister,
I have not played for real money yet there so do not know if any difference. If it is as random as they say with the random seed thing - then should be no difference??
Anyway, here is my latest session in demo mode at BVNoZero and how I staked it:

HOHE (START @ 1-1-2-2)
LOHE  +1
LELO   +1
HOHO  +2
LEHE   +3
HEHO   +4
HOHE   +4
HOLE   +4
LOLO   +5
HOHE  +6
HOHE   +2 (UP TO 3-3-4-4) *lost all 4 bets here due to line repeat
HEHO   +2
HELE    +0 (UP TO 4-4-5-5)
HOHE   +0
LELE     +4 (DOWN TO 2-2-3-3)
HOLE    +6 (DOWN TO 1-1-2-2)
LOLO    +7
HXXX     +8

72 SPINS. 17 GAMES. +8 pts

I thought it safer to not use a marty for quick recovery after a repeat line - but instead preferred more gradual recovery and I would advise others to do same. You never know if/when disaster could strike!

A.

Yeah should be the same

BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUT

I've never test demo only Real Cash, sooooooo it would good to see you compare your results !

How come your not playing for real ? 0.01 is the kick off point !
Would love to see you compare your results with Demo


I just played a session (of your version) and in real play had 3 lines the same

HOHO
HOHO
HOHO
L


Sooooooo what I did was break up my routine, some lines I played to match and others I played to be unmatched

I strated with 10 Euro, I now have 15 Euro  ;D

I was playing just test money at .50p
My progression was a little more aggressive than yours  :D


Will resume 2moz, Im beat !
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 18, 04:45 PM 2011
Quote from: Halba1 on Jun 18, 02:59 PM 2011
Hello JOHN LEGEND phenomenal results on BV RNG REAL PLAY(continuous 20 mins).

CODE 4 played, on each LETTER not just a ROW

total units +15units

no loss.

i am playing for real now.

starting with 30c units. no zero.
Be careful on Betvoyager Twister got wiped on there. Maybe it will be harder for them to fix CODE 4. What happened to JUICE91 a few days ago he was giving an RNG a good hiding. Lets hope it never bit him back.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jun 18, 04:47 PM 2011
Hi Twister,

Here is my same set using alternate SAME/OPPOSITE betting.

HOHE (START @ 1-1-2-2)
LOHE  +1 (OPP)
LELO   +2 (SAME)
HOHO  +3 (OPP)
LEHE   +3 (SAME)
HEHO   +4 (OPP)
HOHE   +5 (SAME)
HOLE   +5 (OPP)
LOLO   +5 (SAME)
HOHE  +6 (OPP)
HOHE   +7 (SAME)
HEHO   +7 (OPP)
HELE    +8 (SAME)
HOHE   +8 (OPP)
LELE     +6 (SAME) UP TO 2-2-3-3
HOLE    +8 (OPP)  DOWN TO 1-1-2-2
LOLO    +8 (SAME)
HXXX     +9 (OPP)

A better outcome and no complete losing line. Maybe advantageous in switching...

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 18, 05:08 PM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Jun 18, 04:47 PM 2011
Hi Twister,

Here is my same set using alternate SAME/OPPOSITE betting.

HOHE (START @ 1-1-2-2)
LOHE  +1 (OPP)
LELO   +2 (SAME)
HOHO  +3 (OPP)
LEHE   +3 (SAME)
HEHO   +4 (OPP)
HOHE   +5 (SAME)
HOLE   +5 (OPP)
LOLO   +5 (SAME)
HOHE  +6 (OPP)
HOHE   +7 (SAME)
HEHO   +7 (OPP)
HELE    +8 (SAME)
HOHE   +8 (OPP)
LELE     +6 (SAME) UP TO 2-2-3-3
HOLE    +8 (OPP)  DOWN TO 1-1-2-2
LOLO    +8 (SAME)
HXXX     +9 (OPP)

A better outcome and no complete losing line. Maybe advantageous in switching...

A.
Atlantis hi, this may be your best method yet. You have re-adressed the AC/DC concept very well here. I know you arent a fan of martingale style progressions, so are always seeking a less aggressive staking plan. I myself would never go beyond 4 steps for a Martingale except for MV5 E/C where I use a 5 step one. But its justified with the impressive strikerate.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jun 18, 05:57 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jun 18, 04:45 PM 2011
Be careful on Betvoyager Twister got wiped on there. Maybe it will be harder for them to fix CODE 4. What happened to JUICE91 a few days ago he was giving an RNG a good hiding. Lets hope it never bit him back.

Ha ha ha ha. Yeah it did bite back i had tripled my bankroll but had also tripled my units. And therefore the 4 step progression took my whole BR.

But ah it doesnt matter. The fact that i tripled my bankroll on RNG using this method is a good sign. PLaying with 1unit i would most probably still be going.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 18, 06:17 PM 2011
Quote from: Juiced91 on Jun 18, 05:57 PM 2011
Ha ha ha ha. Yeah it did bite back I had tripled my bankroll but had also tripled my units. And therefore the 4 step progression took my whole BR.

But ah it doesn't matter. The fact that I tripled my bankroll on RNG using this method is a good sign. PLaying with 1unit I would most probably still be going.


You made the classic mistake Juice trying to move up too fast. Ive won 200 games live  but wont increase my stakes until I have won 6 banks of 160 units (960) Thats about the right pace.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 18, 06:24 PM 2011
Tested atlantis on betvoyager real money mode. I conclude you probably need a stop profit, e.g. if you win 3 units, get out. stop-loss, if you lose 6 units overall, get out.

Real money mode on betvoyager is MUCH harder to make money.

HOHO
LOLO (opp) +1
LELE (same) +2
HOLE (opp) +3
LELO (s) +3
LOHO (opp) +3
HELE (s) -3 - 6 units lost here, because all were opposite
LELO(opp) 0 progression 3,3,4,4
LELE (same) +3
LELO (opp)   -1       progression kept at 2,2,4,4

running total -1 unit. 40 spins.

Overall I would use this system again. This is because it protects the person from  major losses. above only -1 unit, it doesn't KILL br. i got murdered on betvoyager using full progression last night, down 50 units
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 18, 06:37 PM 2011
Quote from: Halba1 on Jun 18, 06:24 PM 2011
Tested atlantis on betvoyager real money mode. I conclude you probably need a stop profit, e.g. if you win 3 units, get out. stop-loss, if you lose 6 units overall, get out.

Real money mode on betvoyager is MUCH harder to make money.

HOHO
LOLO (opp) +1
LELE (same) +2
HOLE (opp) +3
LELO (s) +3
LOHO (opp) +3
HELE (s) -3 - 6 units lost here, because all were opposite
LELO(opp) 0 progression 3,3,4,4
LELE (same) +3
LELO (opp)   -1       progression kept at 2,2,4,4

running total -1 unit. 40 spins.

Overall I would use this system again. This is because it protects the person from  major losses. above only -1 unit, it doesn't KILL br. I got murdered on betvoyager using full progression last night, down 50 units
Rngs are not roulette Halba, you don't proof a method on an Rng. Do you know why Rngs were created? The people who run the gaming industry know why they win.

They don't win because their games can't be beaten, they win because of human greed and lack of patience. It was a masterstroke on their part. Offer the average Joe the choice between a relatively slow but TRUE live wheel and a software version that spins a lot faster.

They knew they had no way of losing. They will flock like sheep and get fleeced like a sheep being sheared. Can you imagine how many millions they have made from these scams.

PLAY REAL, PLAY *LIVE*
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 18, 06:39 PM 2011
yep thats it i guess .its just programmed to make you lose money. fun mode makes you win money
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 18, 06:48 PM 2011
Quote from: Halba1 on Jun 18, 06:39 PM 2011
Yep that's it I guess .its just programmed to make you lose money. fun mode makes you win money
that's their bait, unsuspecting folk think practice mode is how its going to be for real. I can beat an RNG all day in practice mode. As soon as theres REAL MONEY on the line the CHEATING shall commence.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 18, 07:56 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jun 18, 06:48 PM 2011
that's their bait, unsuspecting folk think practice mode is how its going to be for real. I can beat an RNG all day in practice mode. As soon as theres REAL MONEY on the line the CHEATING shall commence.

hello john legend. i tried all the systems on betvoyager past 24 hrs. the only thing that is beating it now is CODE 4, provided you just play the line only hit and run...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jun 19, 12:17 AM 2011
There is a THIRD way can be played...
Here is my session again - this time alternating EACH LINE and using a pattern switch!

SAME-OPP-SAME-OPP
and
OPP-SAME-OPP-SAME

I like to start with OPPOSITE so:

HOHE (START @ 1-1-2-2)
LOHE  +1 (OSOS)
LELO   +1 (SOSO)
HOHO  +2 (OSOS)
LEHE   +2 (SOSO)
HEHO   +3 (OSOS)
HOHE   +4 (SOSO)
HOLE   +4 (OSOS)
LOLO   +4 (SOSO)
HOHE  +5 (OSOS)
HOHE   +6 (SOSO)
HEHO   +6 (OSOS)
HELE    +7 (SOSO)
HOHE   +7 (OSOS)
LELE     +7 (SOSO)
HOLE    +8 (OSOS)
LOLO    +8 (SOSO)
HXXX     +9 (OSOS)

+9 (HIGHEST BET=2)

Here is Halba1's game reproduced and played using alternate patterns:

HOHO (START @ 1-1-2-2)
LOLO (OSOS) +1
LELE (SOSO) +2
HOLE (OSOS) +3
LELO (SOSO) +3
LOHO (OSOS) +3
HELE (SOSO) +3
LELO (OSOS) +4
LELE (SOSO) +5
LELO (OSOS) +5

+5 (HIGHEST BET=2)

Regards,
A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Hermes on Jun 19, 12:29 AM 2011
RNGs are like this:
Imagine glass see through table with marked roulette layoff. I as a casino lay under the table and watch carefully where do you gambler put your chips.  Oh... you put it on 12,35,27,0,00 I can see your bets below the table because it is see through. I spin 17 are you happy?
Hermes
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 19, 01:31 AM 2011
Hello hermes. it happened countless times in the last 24 hrs. I cannot believe some of the repeating numbers that came up. absolutely bull

also it allows me to win a little in the beginning, to get me hooked. 3 mins later it just cheats
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: viclimks on Jun 19, 04:01 AM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend link=topic=5848. msg58722#msg58722 date=1308436664
Rngs are not roulette Halba, you don't proof a method on an Rng.    Do you know why Rngs were created? The people who run the gaming industry know why they win.   

They don't win because their games can't be beaten, they win because of human greed and lack of patience.    It was a masterstroke on their part.    Offer the average Joe the choice between a relatively slow but TRUE live wheel and a software version that spins a lot faster.   

They knew they had no way of losing.    They will flock like sheep and get fleeced like a sheep being sheared.    Can you imagine how many millions they have made from these scams.   

PLAY REAL, PLAY *LIVE*

JL, hows yr code4 going on?by the way,how long do you wait b4 you start a fresh session.   thanks to you n amk,i m  still going very strong with yr hit n run pattern on live wheel.   Play 5 sessions per day,all strikes on level 1 n 2.   
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jun 19, 04:11 AM 2011
Hi all,

2 short sessions aiming for +3 (hit and run) and using alternate pattern technique:

Ladbrokes Live Low-Limit AutoRoulette:

HEHE (START @ 1-1-2-2)
HEHE  (OSOS) +0
LEHO  (SOSO) +0
LELE   (OSOS) +1
LEHE   (SOSO) +1
LOLE   (OSOS) +1
LOLE   (SOSO) +2
LOLE   (OSOS) +2
HELE   (SOSO) +2
LXXX     (OSOS) +3
STOP

SmartLiveCasino Live Low-Limit AutoRoulette:

LEHE (START @ 1-1-2-2)
LOLO (OSOS) +0
LEHE (SOSO) +1
LELE  (OSOS) +1
LELE  (SOSO) +2
HXXX   (OSOS) +3
STOP

Notice no damage from the double/triple repeat lines with the alternating patterns.

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jun 19, 06:50 AM 2011
Here is longer session on BVNoZero r.n.g. showing recovery staking:

HOLO (START @1-1-2-2)
LEHE (OSOS) +1
HOHE (SOSO) +2
LEHE (OSOS) +3
HOLE (SOSO) +3
LEHE (OSOS) +4
HOLE (SOSO) +4
HOHE (OSOS) +4
HOHE (SOSO) +5
HEHE  (OSOS) +5
HOLE  (SOSO) +6
HOLO  (OSOS) +6
HOLO  (SOSO) +7
HELO  (OSOS) +5  UP TO 2-2-3-3
LOLE   (SOSO) +5
LELO   (OSOS) -5  UP TO 4-4-5-5
LOLE   (SOSO) -1
LOLE   (OSOS) -1
HEHE  (SOSO)  -1
LEHE   (OSOS) +3
LEHE   (SOSO) +7  DOWN TO 1-1-2-2
HOHO  (OSOS) +8
HEHE  (SOSO) +9
LXXX    (OSOS) +10

Cheers,
A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 19, 07:09 AM 2011
Hi. that is a good session. the benefit is you don't have to bet on every spin(freedom/waiting).

about 80 spins there.

LOLE   (SOSO) +5
LELO   (OSOS) -5  UP TO 4-4-5-5

that one is the only concern. 10 unit blowout in 1 hit.

maybe you should wait for blowout and then start betting at 4,4,5,5 or stop profit at 5 unit instead of risking a 10 unit meltdown
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jun 19, 09:57 AM 2011
Quote from: Halba1 on Jun 19, 07:09 AM 2011
Hi. that is a good session. the benefit is you don't have to bet on every spin(freedom/waiting).

about 80 spins there.

LOLE   (SOSO) +5
LELO   (OSOS) -5  UP TO 4-4-5-5

that one is the only concern. 10 unit blowout in 1 hit.

maybe you should wait for blowout and then start betting at 4,4,5,5 or stop profit at 5 unit instead of risking a 10 unit meltdown

Hi Halba1,
To counteract this and hopefully be less volatile I increase the incremental bet series twofold to now be strings of FOUR.

e.g.: 1-1-1-1, 2-2-2-2, 3-3-3-3,4-4-4-4....etc...

The actual betting "string" for the next line is calculated according to the unit +/- at the end of each line... Betting and placement is exactly as before with the OPP/SAME rotation.

Here is same session, Halba1. Profit not as great - but perhaps less riskier?

HOLO (START @1-1-1-1)
LEHE (OSOS) +1   (1 ahead so stay at 1-1-1-1)
HOHE (SOSO) +2   (1 ahead so stay at 1-1-1-1)
LEHE (OSOS) +3    (1 ahead so stay at 1-1-1-1)
HOLE (SOSO) +3    (0 behind so stay at 1-1-1-1)  
LEHE (OSOS) +4    (1 ahead so stay at 1-1-1-1)
HOLE (SOSO) +4    (0 behind so stay at 1-1-1-1)
HOHE (OSOS) +4   (0 behind so stay at 1-1-1-1)
HOHE (SOSO) +5   (1 ahead so stay at 1-1-1-1)
HEHE  (OSOS) +3  (2 behind so go up to 1-1-2-2)
HOLE  (SOSO) +4  (1 behind so down to 1-1-1-2)
HOLO  (OSOS) +4  (1 behind so stay at 1-1-1-2)
HOLO  (SOSO) +5  (0 behind so down to 1-1-1-1)
HELO  (OSOS)  +3  (2 behind so up to 1-1-2-2)
LOLE   (SOSO)  +3  (2 behind so stay at 1-1-2-2)
LELO   (OSOS)  -3   (8 behind so up to 2-2-3-3)
LOLE   (SOSO)  -1   (6 behind so down to 2-2-2-3)
LOLE   (OSOS)  -1   (6 behind so stay at 2-2-2-3)
HEHE  (SOSO)  -1   (6 behind so stay at 2-2-2-3)
LEHE   (OSOS) +1  (4 behind so down to 2-2-2-2)
LEHE   (SOSO) +3  (2 behind so down to 1-1-2-2)
HOHO  (OSOS) +4  (1 behind so down to 1-1-1-2)
HEHE  (SOSO)  +5  (0 behind so down to 1-1-1-1)  
LXXX    (OSOS)  +6  (1 ahead so stay at 1-1-1-1)

+6
Highest Bet = 2

Maybe can use to win 3 or so units then skedaddle and relogon for next session.

A.
PS Edited result to +6 (+5 was incorrect)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Twisteruk on Jun 19, 10:36 AM 2011
@ Atlantis


Id love you to play for Real at BV and see if there is any difference with "Demo Mode" !!!
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jun 19, 11:01 AM 2011
Quote from: Twisteruk on Jun 19, 10:36 AM 2011
@ Atlantis

Id love you to play for Real at BV and see if there is any difference with "Demo Mode" !!!

Am not member yet - Only Ladbrokes and SLC. Will consider it though. The NoZero seems very appealing.

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 19, 02:50 PM 2011
good results. a bit of a grind but the exposure is appealing.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jun 19, 03:04 PM 2011
Quote from: Halba1 on Jun 19, 02:50 PM 2011
Good results. a bit of a grind but the exposure is appealing.

Hi Halba1,

I've since had a really *bad* session when my first test under the large BVspinfile.txt.
Stopped when I was  88spins and -31 (5-5-6-6) Never in profit at any stage!
It just goes to show - you can never tell when it will sink!!
I'm disappointed but perhaps not entirely surprised again. My confidence and trust in this approach has taken a "knock" and I will not now pursue this further. I choose to spend time investigating other approaches now.
So this is the end of my testing on CODE 4 for EC for time being...

Atlantis.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 19, 03:50 PM 2011
Go for the dozen approach atlantis. better odds, more combinations, safer hit and run

in ECs  you aren't confusing random enough. the only way to profit is to confuse random. pattern 4 with ah solid P1 P2 P3 progression might be a good recommendation for fast money with ECs.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jun 19, 05:20 PM 2011
Hi Halba1,

Yes amk's CODE 4 for D/C with "hit'n'run" is something else and I agree with you and JL.
Plus, I like your own extension to this concept in the other thread where you made a matrix 6.
I think there may be other approaches to EC betting... For instance BlueZero intimates he has found a profitable play in that "challenge" thread...
Best wishes,

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 19, 06:11 PM 2011
The reason why code 4 is successful because it scrambles random. even if you have repeats it is scrambled up like GOOP because of alternating dozens/columns. random doesn't have an answer for it.

so far this is the best system on rouletteforum, and just needs a workable progression which is now solved  by GLC.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 19, 06:48 PM 2011
Hello Halba1,

I might have missed something, what is GLC's progression?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 19, 06:57 PM 2011
link:://rouletteforum.cc/money-management/gr8player's-progression/msg58710/#msg58710 (link:://rouletteforum.cc/money-management/gr8player's-progression/msg58710/#msg58710)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 19, 08:29 PM 2011
i tried CODE 4 on BV today. it is good for hit and run. Best off to only bet line different, as most lines i am getting even winners/losers, some more winners etc.

you can make +1unit on each line, usually within the first 2-3 spins.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ophis on Jun 20, 01:27 AM 2011
Hi guys. Is there is aything else for this system than explanation in post 1?

Any mods?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 20, 02:23 AM 2011
hi ophis. the system is exact as the 1st page. the only mod is to play each row, no need to spin 9 spins or whatever. also another recent mod is to play an easier progression like GLC's 5 bet sequence
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 20, 09:33 AM 2011
JohnLegend,

I don't think we have discussed yet what the BR should be for CODE 4..........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ophis on Jun 20, 03:00 PM 2011
Official version is for Dozens and Columns right?

Because in theory i could make tracker for:
D/C + H/L + E/O + R/B.... and track them all at once....

it would be then Code 4 Ultimate?

either way for now i will make for DC.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 20, 04:33 PM 2011
the main flaw with code 4 is the bankroll. DC require tripling of bets, and EC's 4 wide require massive bankroll

maybe pattern breaker/p4(conservative progression) are best
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 20, 04:51 PM 2011
Halba1,

Three step progression is only 26 units!!!
Winning streakes 200+
Look at the stats......
If you cover the zero in your progression, which only slightly increases it you have a solid playing style...

JohnLegend only went to the 4rth progression 2 times in 200 games due to the zero.........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Jun 21, 01:01 AM 2011
Played Code4 today at PaddyPower Slingshot. Results for FIRST game:

3B3A
1A3A
2B3C
3B3A  ouch

I only bet 1,3,9 and luckily skipped 4th bet.
Here goes hit & run  :) In the meantime I bet
against set of 4 dozens or columns not repeating
itself in the next 4 spins:

1223 bet against 1223
1323 win on 2
1313 win on 3
3123 win on 3

The same progression 1,3,9,27 but I only go 3 steps.
Results: 10 wins for each playing hit and run.
Before I started playing it I tested it on live spins in Smartlive
(about 4000 spins) and playing CONTINUOUSLY  you winning streaks
of 100+.

My point is that we can talk about how good the system is, how it
"scrambles random" but it comes down to when you the game.

In 1 day if you continuously play  on a online live wheel casino you can expect to
have more or less 1200 spins. Code 4 is expected to lose every 81 games.
One game requires 16 spins and if don't bet on the next line you can play
about 80 games.

If you lucky and play just max 5 games a day you can go on for 1 month or longer
and have winning streaks of 300 or...loose on the first game ever played  ;)

I am just talking about Code4,D&C,Pattern4 not about MATRIX methods.
I played them all and had success but the key is to play SHORT sessions
and proper money management. I'd rather play 2 games with higher stakes
than 4 with lower ones & get $$$ & run.

I want to thank all contributors to this forum. You can never learn enough  ;D





Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 21, 02:13 AM 2011
Yep. I also got repeaters or near repeaters. I bailed after 3rd.

your dozens strategy- won't work all the time, I also got repeaters . most of the time it works though.

problem with these strategies, is they are high risk. even though high strike rate, we are risking quite a lot of units for only 1 unit
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Jun 21, 03:06 AM 2011
Hello Halba1

I didn't claim that dozen strategy was better than Code4 or it would work all the time.
About the risk of 26 units using just 3 level progression - I don't think it is 2 high.
Of course with P4 you risk 7 units. But I think you better off playing strategy with higher risk
but with higher probability of success f you hit & run. It will allow you 2 play less games daily
with bigger chance 2 keep yr winning streak alive. But it is eventually up 2 yr BR  ;D

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 21, 03:28 AM 2011
I agree rob. I will play CODE 4 hit and run. just a few hits and get the heck out of there to come back in again.

it doesn't matter your unit size really. just play with good unit size, get the few wins and bail.

i just set aside a good 80 euros initially for CODE 4. the bankroll required is only 78 euros for 3 euro units which is what I will use to keep it at the table minimum @ BV non zero.

If i can increase this bankroll to say 150 or so, then i will move to a higher limit zero table.

max table limit per bet for dozen is 60 euro.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ophis on Jun 21, 09:47 AM 2011
I have small request.

Could someone provide me with sample spins (around 40 will do) with this system with complete beting description and LW/Profit?
(what we bet  --  if its LW  --  how much profit/loss  --  each spin)

I would be helpfull because I need to have some exaple to test tracker against it so I can be sure it is working as desired.

Please make sure session is 100% correct without any mistakes. Also please include ZERO.

It does not need to be in Matrix format.
It can be each spin in new line (that would be even better)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 22, 12:13 PM 2011
Hello Ophis,

I will get back to you shortly...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 22, 03:17 PM 2011
Robeenhuut...if you look at it in a positive way you could say glad to get it out of the way.......


Robeenhuut:
Played Code4 today at PaddyPower Slingshot. Results for FIRST game:

3B3A
1A3A
2B3C
3B3A  ouch

I only bet 1,3,9 and luckily skipped 4th bet.
Here goes hit & run  :) In the meantime I bet
against set of 4 dozens or columns not repeating
itself in the next 4 spins:



Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: woods101 on Jun 24, 03:09 PM 2011
@ Halba

Take another read of JL's posts especially regarding BR. If your entire BR is enough to cover only one losing session then think again. Everything can and will happen in Roulette at certain times. Playing this method or (any other method) - I would aim to have at least 20 other equal BR's in hand to enable you to deal with losses as and when they come. 'Don't put all your eggs in one basket as they say', and place the highest value on the words of people who have been playing this game for many years. They will save you a lot of time and more importantly, money.

Woods

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 24, 03:33 PM 2011
Quote from: woods101 on Jun 24, 03:09 PM 2011
@ Halba

Take another read of JL's posts especially regarding BR. If your entire BR is enough to cover only one losing session then think again. Everything can and will happen in Roulette at certain times. Playing this method or (any other method) - I would aim to have at least 20 other equal BR's in hand to enable you to deal with losses as and when they come. 'Don't put all your eggs in one basket as they say', and place the highest value on the words of people who have been playing this game for many years. They will save you a lot of time and more importantly, money.

Woods
Hi Woods, yes one of the classic mistakes with this game is the player who walks into a casino with a 100 units expecting to walk out with a 1000. More often than not they walk out with ZERO.
You must have at least 20 times your minumum progression to be safe. I know that's unrealistic for a newbie with CODE 4. When to play it properly you need 80. In that case I would suggest you have 240. The method is strong enough PLAYED HIT AND RUN. To live closer to the wire. Okay here is a results update for 24/06/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 260
TOTAL GAMES WON 260
TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO
STRIKERATE 100%
BALANCE 520 UNITS PLUS
STEP 1 WINS 132
STEP 2 WINS 88
STEP 3 WINS 36
STEP 4 WINS 4

I've now been taken to the last step 4 times. Three of them contained a zero one didn't. But having now turned my progression over more than three times. AMK is to be congratulated. This as far as I am concerned is almost the best method this forum will ever see. I say ALMOST. If you can imagine a method that can match the numbers I am showing you here. But instead of *80 UNITS* at risk each time you play a game. You have *7 UNITS* at risk. Then you have some idea whats in store this weekend..
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: shermantor on Jun 26, 06:16 PM 2011
Hi guys.  Just played dc and code 4 tonight posted results for dc in dc bit now heres code 4, see what u guys think. played 1-1 2-2 6-6 progression

First game william hill live casino , was playing dc but recorded reults for code 4

3b2a
xxxx
xxxx
3c2a  so win on that if i was playing it! unfortunatly got - 18 units playing dc lol.  So moved to paddy power slingshot, again playing dc but recorded code 4

2a2a
xxxx
xxxx
1b3b good result again but won + 4 on dc then moved to william hill again.  Played hit and run style :)

1b3a
xxxx
xxxx
1b3a played 2 games dc to wait for numbers then moved to code 4 and that happens! great didnt bet 4th progression, didn't have the balls so lucky there! Anyway took the loss moved to paddy power again lost dc again (-6 but would have been -18 if i had bet 6-6!!) and then moved to code 4 lost chance for row 1 vs row 4, so it was row 2 vs row 5

1b1b
3c21
xxxx
3a3a 
3c2  Yep lost again!

Any thoughts onto very unlucky loseing first games in a row on all games i started playing?  obviously would have won first 2 code 4's but then when i bet money - bang - lose??

Anyway gonna play again 2moro see what happens and post relevent data in both posts.

Also got all numbers recored if any1 wants? and sessions where about 20 min each on each site before doing a hit and run, and played live casino william, and slingshot paddy (played slingshot cos smaller bet .10 to cover 0)

Cheers if any posts regarding above :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 27, 07:45 AM 2011
Hello shermantor.....

Regardless of how good a method is it can an will lose sometime....
Might happen after 500 games or happen on your first.....
If it had happened to me I would look at it in a good light, a loss is very very rare, to hit two the first time I play has to put the odds in my favor that lightning won't strike twice so close together........
I'd play again, since my BR allows for this....
If I lose within the next 50 games its just not for me even if the system was mathematically established to be the grail....

However, I did notice that you had

1b1b
3c21
xxxx
3a3a
3c2  Yep lost again!

Why did you not play the 1b1b but played the 3c31(1=a?)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 27, 08:43 AM 2011
yep thats the reason i'm not playing any of the pattern systems anymore. they just lose money eventually as random eventually repeats too risky.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 27, 09:18 AM 2011
Hello Halba1,

Well I do have to say that JohnLegends results speak for themself.....
Use a 3 step progression while covering the zero, only changes betting progression slightly...
You should see great results.....
You BR will always go up then down slightly then up again then down slightly then up again etc....
CODE 4 can and will work, when a lot of people try a method loses will show up at different times, some right at the start some a long way down the road, the overall picture will be good profits....
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Hermes on Jun 27, 12:12 PM 2011
From the JL results when you lose 4 times in 260 sessions I wouldn't bother with the 4 losses because they will be overrolled by winning sessions. Only the progression is not right. Work a better one.
Hermes
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 27, 12:20 PM 2011
Hello Hermes,

Great to hear from you...

I prefer a 3 step progression with covering the zero on each bet....

This would then equal 56 UNITS if I am correct    2/2 0=1    6/6 0=1    19/19 0=2

Using this progression over JL's data would have only lead to one loss which was easily compensated for with all the wins the ZERO had!.......
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: shermantor on Jun 27, 03:34 PM 2011
thanks amk for quick reply!

so with

1b1b
3c21
xxxx
3a3a
3c2

So instead of 1 vs 4 and forgetting to place bet i didnt need to play 2 vs 5 i could have just done 1 vs 5?

but yeah thougt it was funny couldnt belive bad luck lol, gonna play again tonight see what happens, do like the system tho very clever just gotta play thru the bad times!

ill post what happens. :)

cheers
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 27, 04:53 PM 2011
Quote from: Hermes on Jun 27, 12:12 PM 2011
From the JL results when you lose 4 times in 260 sessions I wouldn't bother with the 4 losses because they will be overrolled by winning sessions. Only the progression is not right. Work a better one.
Hermes


i have officially binned code 4. i just see enough repeaters, one repeater you lose 9/9 = 18 units on the 3rd attempt, takes too long to recover.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 27, 06:59 PM 2011
Hello Halba1

If you have a paypal account I will bet you that you win the next 100 games of CODE 4 :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: donik7777 on Jun 27, 08:55 PM 2011
Hi guys!
You try to hit only on the second line (loss of -2)
or 2 and 3 (loss of -8).
I calculated the results of all games in the code made ​ guys and always in profit (you can calculate yourself), and do not recover -26, if played in triple progression.
Sorry for bad English.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 28, 07:48 AM 2011
Hello donnik777,

Could you explain a little clearer...

Thanks........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 28, 02:26 PM 2011
CODE 4 RESULTS UPDATE FOR 28/6/11

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 300
TOTAL GAMES WON 300
TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 600 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 151
STEP 2 WINS 97
STEP 3 WINS 46
STEP 4 WINS 6

Played two games a session CODE 4 is amazing. I am waiting to see if I can win 400 games without loss. Then I will increase my win target.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 28, 02:59 PM 2011
Amazing results JL!!

How may times was the zero responsible for taking you to the forth progression?.........
I believe there were at least 3 occasions out of the six......
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 28, 03:20 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 28, 02:59 PM 2011
Amazing results JL!!

How may times was the zero responsible for taking you to the forth progression?.........
I believe there were at least 3 occasions out of the six......
There have been four games out of the six AMK that had a ZERO in their makeup. One of them a DOUBLE ZERO.
I don't even panic when I am pushed to the final step, not now as I have nearly turned over my progression four times. I am expecting a loss. The fact I am not getting one  just amazes me. A word of caution though. REMEMBER, I play 2 GAMES a session 5 TIMES a day. But record 5 games a session 5 TIMES a day. Had I played five game sessions I would have now lost twice. So those short and sweet sessions give CODE 4 its power.
I know its a bitter pill to swallow for NEWBIES and VETERANS alike. But you cannot rush success with this game you really cannot.
When I present the method I believe will never lose on Sunday. This point will be driven home once again. INVINCIBILITY comes at a price to the player. That price is TIME. Learn to live with it, if that's what you seek.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Kingspin on Jun 28, 03:23 PM 2011
I guess we all can see that john the ledgend is the worlds LUCKIEST , SUPERLUCKY ,   iNCREDIBLY LUCKY , roulette player with out any doubt . :D :thumbsup: ??? ;D
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 28, 03:40 PM 2011
Quote from: Kingspin on Jun 28, 03:23 PM 2011
I guess we all can see that john the ledgend is the worlds LUCKIEST , SUPERLUCKY ,   iNCREDIBLY LUCKY , roulette player with out any doubt . :D :thumbsup: ??? ;D
There is no luck in roulette Kingspin. Timing yes. Look at it this way, you play any system too long it will lose. If you HIT AND RUN a method that has paper odds of 80/1. Winning streaks in the hundreds are an absolute possibility. I assure you if 100 PEOPLE play EXACTLY as I do, the majority of them will garner the same results.
But you won't, most are already tweaking a method before they have played 50 games. Think about what I am saying here very carefully. Your biggest enemy isnt RANDOM, HOUSE EDGE, HOUSE LIMITS ETC. Your biggest enemy is you. Or more precisely YOUR MIND.
I know this already because every shortcoming I see on here and everywhere the game of roulette is spoken of and played. I HAD MYSELF. Do you think I wouldnt like to play this game from 6 am in the morning to 12 at night. And become a millionaire in a few months. Of course I would. BUT, you simply cannot. You have to pay your dues. And the primary one is TIME.
And anyone who thinks they can get around that is not going to be successful in the long haul. You might win for months and months. Then hit a the mother of all losing streaks and wipe out all you gained. You cannot go to war with the wheel in long endless sessions. My moneys on the wheel everytime. I know that all that has been said of this games invincibility will come to visit you if you play as the CASINOS EXPECT YOU TO PLAY.
They already know this, play their game you;re toast. Play SMART. Short attacks. on a strong method. There is no way you will go negative. Even PATTERN BREAKER. Which has an expected strikerate one tenth of CODE 4. Will produce anything from 10/1------15/1 played HIT AND RUN. They will never be precise gaps. I am talking longterm somethimes you will win 5 games then lose. Then you will win 25 games before you lose again. Understand this CLEARLY.
Its the ONLY WAY, you will EVER best this game in the longterm. To a degree that will satisfy the time/risk and concentration you invest.
TIME,TIME,TIME that's your price to beat this game, come to terms with it, accept it. And you are on your way.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: LuckyLucy on Jun 28, 03:57 PM 2011
Great posts JL and some excellent advice.    So pleased to see that winning streak getting ever longer!
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jun 28, 04:10 PM 2011
TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 1000
TOTAL GAMES WON 1000
TOTAL GAMES LOST none

BALANCE + 2300
STEP 1 WINS 637
STEP 2 WINS 298
STEP 3 WINS 56
STEP 4 WINS 9


;)


Is this the mother of all methods? WOW

(i will return to be a system player again)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 28, 04:37 PM 2011
Goodness......

Pleased to meet you ZeroBlue :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 28, 04:55 PM 2011
I think if the zero was covered on each bet winnings would "nullify" a loss .......
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 28, 05:12 PM 2011
Quote from: LuckyLucy on Jun 28, 03:57 PM 2011
Great posts JL and some excellent advice.    So pleased to see that winning streak getting ever longer!
Thanks Lucy, but look at Blue zero, if people think I am doing well.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 28, 05:52 PM 2011
You should post more LuckyLucky  :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: epitaph on Jun 28, 05:59 PM 2011
Quote from: ZeroBlue on Jun 28, 04:10 PM 2011
TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 1000
TOTAL GAMES WON 1000
TOTAL GAMES LOST none

BALANCE + 2300
STEP 1 WINS 637
STEP 2 WINS 298
STEP 3 WINS 56
STEP 4 WINS 9


;)


Is this the mother of all methods? WOW

(i will return to be a system player again)

Hi All,

I have just started playing for real on live tables using the advise and systems in the forum and at the moment while starting with very low units am doing well.

Just one question regarding your steps, as I am playing i only have 2 levels/steps? how do you stretch the progression to enable 4 steps/levels? or am i misunderstanding what you mean by steps? eg. Step one - 1,2,4,8. step two 4,8,16,32... ??
Thanks
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: shermantor on Jun 28, 06:07 PM 2011
Ok post for william hill code 4 -  gonna love it :)

22 min game live casino. Plan play 2 dc then 2 code 4 Numbers i got

30 22 20 16 4 34 31 14 15 22 20 15 11 20 11 17 25 26 1 30 28 35 15 16 32 35 10 12 35 11 1 33

so for code 4

3A2A
1A3B
2A2C
1B1B result ! +1

and then

3B1C
3B2A
3B1C
3B1C lol so thats then end of code 4 for me bet 3rd progression. anything wrong i did there?

2 losing streaks first 2 times i play when others got like 600 wins no loss surely i aint getting it right? but funny on how 3 out 4 for second game the same code!!
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 28, 06:20 PM 2011
Welcome Epitaph,

Progression is  1/1  3/3/  9/9  27/27........ or incremental variations of it........

How are things in New Zealand............
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jun 28, 06:34 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jun 28, 05:12 PM 2011
Thanks Lucy, but look at Blue zero, if people think I am doing well.


no big deal with the proper trigger.
as JL says it is a question of patience.
Play after a full loss and see...


as anyone already coded Code4?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Aleexx on Jun 28, 06:46 PM 2011
is this code 4 can be played at live european roullete? thanks Alex
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 28, 06:53 PM 2011
After a full loss, I see.....

Operator...... sorry...... Ophis, could you please code the new variation of CODE 4 for all.....
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ophis on Jun 28, 08:40 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 28, 06:53 PM 2011
After a full loss, I see.....

Operator...... sorry...... Ophis, could you please code the new variation of CODE 4 for all.....
And what is the new variation? betting always ZERO?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: epitaph on Jun 28, 08:50 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 28, 06:20 PM 2011
Welcome Epitaph,

Progression is  1/1  3/3/  9/9  27/27........ or incremental variations of it........

How are things in New Zealand............

Hi AMK,

Wet here in NZ, looking forward to summer.

Thanks for your progression info. I think i have just clicked in regard to the steps... when you guys post results and talk about steps from 1-4 do you mean fro example:

3A2A
1A3B
2A2C
1B1C - 1=step one, B=step 2, 1=step 3, C=step 4

and if you were to lose all 4 steps you would have lost at level 1 progression. you would then move into level 2 (recovery) in your progression unit size, eg. 9/9, 27/27, 81/81, 243/243 for the next game?

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jun 28, 09:06 PM 2011
Quote from: shermantor on Jun 28, 06:07 PM 2011
Ok post for william hill code 4 -  gonna love it :)

22 min game live casino. Plan play 2 dc then 2 code 4 Numbers i got

30 22 20 16 4 34 31 14 15 22 20 15 11 20 11 17 25 26 1 30 28 35 15 16 32 35 10 12 35 11 1 33

so for code 4

3A2A
1A3B
2A2C
1B1B result ! +1

and then

3B1C
3B2A
3B1C
3B1C LoL so that's then end of code 4 for me bet 3rd progression. anything wrong i did there?

2 losing streaks first 2 times i play when others got like 600 wins no loss surely i ain't getting it right? but funny on how 3 out 4 for second game the same code!!


Look. If it is working with code 2 why do you play code4?


The thing is each number has is own column and dozen. we bet it won't stay in that 4/8 numbers PERMUTATION all the time.


check it out
3C2A


2B2A   WW


1A3A   WW


3A2B   WLWW


2C2A   WW


2B2C   LWLW


1B2B   WLLW


1B2B   LLLL


3A3B   WW


1A3C   WLLW


3A3B   WLLW


2C2A   WW


3B3B   WW


1A1C   WW


3B1B   WW


1A3C   WW




this is code 2
;D




I get you played original and this is the same alteration for what i presented before...


code4 original      code4 MOD      
3A2A      3C2A2B2A      
            
            
            
1A3B   w   1A3A3A2B   ww   
            
            
            
2A2C   w   2C2A2B2C   ww   
            
            
            
1B1B   w   1B2B1B2B   ww   
            
            
            
3B1C   w   3A3B1A3C   ww   
            
            
            
3B2A   llw   3A3B2C2A   LLLL   WW
            
            
            
3B1C   llw   3B3B1A1C   LWLLWW   
            
            
            
3B1C   llll   3B1B1A3C   LLWL   LLWL
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jun 28, 09:29 PM 2011
it is really up to you  :D


@ophis
the way i play is to wait for a complete loss LLLL
if Lost again i wait for the next trigger, as i have plenty of time to make money... ;-)


PS- It is funny how what may seem an error ends in a happy discovery. (code 2)



Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: donik7777 on Jun 28, 10:19 PM 2011
I meant to skip the first spin (dozen) and play against the column.
Without progression (-2) or 2-step progression against 2 and 3 spins (loss-8), but not always play 1,3,9,27 and bring to 80 (for example, if $ 50 is $ 4,000). It is better to wait any longer and play without a huge bankroll, and at zero cost less, especially here in the United States.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 29, 06:37 AM 2011
Quote from: ZeroBlue on Jun 28, 09:29 PM 2011
it is really up to you  :D


@ophis
the way i play is to wait for a complete loss LLLL
if Lost again i wait for the next trigger, as i have plenty of time to make money... ;-)


PS- It is funny how what may seem an error ends in a happy discovery. (code 2)


Hello Zeroblue,

Could you please describe your playing style a little more.......

You record CODE  4 numbers/letters 

3A2B
2A1C
2B1B
1B1B.........
3A2A
2A2A
1B1B........   This would be a loss

Do you then directly bet that 3A2A won't repeat or play that 1B1B won't repeat? Do you play a few consecutive games due to a loss just occurring clearing the way for several games to be played?

Also, on average how long does a session take for you to gain 1 unit.........

Would be great if you can give us a clear picture of your approach.......

Thanks for your time.............



                                                 
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 29, 03:59 PM 2011
I recommend playing two consecutive games then SHUTTING IT DOWN. Such application has brought me as of today 310 wins ZERO losses. Now to all these naysayers who I feel creeping up on this excellent method. Keep this in your minds. If this method wins 81 times to every losing game. It has roulette beaten. I am now certain it wins a lot more than that WHEN APPLIED PROPERLY.
I only have one method in my bag that I believe OPHIS, BAYES and all the others steeped in math and bots and the rest will have NOTHING to say other than oh it takes a bit of patience. I already know, and am actually angry with myself for not spotting this before as the results were staring me in the face. But the difference between what I normally do and the method I present on Sunday is you can PLAY IT DAY AND NIGHT. Yes you just read that from me.
You can play this DAY AND NIGHT. And random will have no anwser to it. It exhausts random, it is absolutely a HOLY GRAIL. And no one will refute this within a week or two of it being presented on here. What will continue is the exposure of those who from the get go lack the most essential attribute to conquer this game for the REST OF THEIR LIVES.
Oh yes that will not change. But be sure on Sunday afternoon an ABSOLUTE HOLY GRAIL exists on this forum. Those with the Attribute required WILL NEVER LOSE AGAIN.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 29, 04:22 PM 2011
Can't wait JohnLegend......yes I can :)

Got a glimps of something I missed before.....

Maui13 once mentioned that if you were to just flat bet you will basically always be in the profits every 100 games......

I think if you look at two weeks as your session you will always be in the plus.....

You can read the post below....



Quote from: Maui13 on June 14, 2011, 01:37:41 am

    Check, even if you flat bet 1/1,1/1,1/1,1/1, - your first time wins are the most so 91 - 50 -17 -2 = + 22    :twisted:

    If put into a tester, flat betting, I would love to see the outcome after say 10 000 spins...just for the hell of it!!!

    Thanks for the advice JL - also going to play it like that!!!  :thumbsup:

     
JohnLegend:

The method is strong enough to do this, no more than five times though. It speeds up turnover without compromising the strength of the method. NEVER PLAY ONE LINE UNDER ANOTHER. I have now seen nine repeaters in the 170 games I've played.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 29, 05:04 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 29, 04:22 PM 2011
Can't wait JohnLegend......yes I can :)

Got a glimps of something I missed before.....

Maui13 once mentioned that if you were to just flat bet you will basically always be in the profits every 100 games......

I think if you look at two weeks as your session you will always be in the plus.....

You can read the post below....



Quote from: Maui13 on June 14, 2011, 01:37:41 am

    Check, even if you flat bet 1/1,1/1,1/1,1/1, - your first time wins are the most so 91 - 50 -17 -2 = + 22    :twisted:

    If put into a tester, flat betting, I would love to see the outcome after say 10 000 spins...just for the hell of it!!!

    Thanks for the advice JL - also going to play it like that!!!  :thumbsup:

     
JohnLegend:

The method is strong enough to do this, no more than five times though. It speeds up turnover without compromising the strength of the method. NEVER PLAY ONE LINE UNDER ANOTHER. I have now seen nine repeaters in the 170 games I've played.
Hi AMK, yes there are a few ways to own this game. But there are no prescriptions for lack of PATIENCE. And staying power. What I am saying to anyone who reads this post is 63 units and the right mindset buys you a Holy Grail. There will be no excuses no taking down or doubting this one. Bring Einstein himself back to life he would have to concede he was very wrong about his conclusive views towards the games invincibility.
The informed and wise have known for many years that Roulette has achilles heels. And if you look deep enough into it you literally take randoms legs away altogether. For some years I suspected random has trouble doing certain things with consistent efficiency, so as to be exploitable in a profitting method. But Now I absolutely know it has a limit it simply cannot go beyond not today, not ever. And this one will ONCE AND FOR ALL, Tell Bayes and his ilk whether RNGS do indeed cheat. Including the beloved BV. Because if this loses even on an RNG. You know it cheats PERIOD.
This method never loses PERIOD. Sunday its yours to do as you will with, ignore it, use it. But don't you ever tell me or anyone else a HOLY GRAIL doesn't exist.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jun 29, 06:04 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jun 29, 05:04 PM 2011
Hi AMK, yes there are a few ways to own this game. But there are no prescriptions for lack of PATIENCE. And staying power. What I am saying to anyone who reads this post is 63 units and the right mindset buys you a Holy Grail. There will be no excuses no taking down or doubting this one. Bring Einstein himself back to life he would have to concede he was very wrong about his conclusive views towards the games invincibility.
The informed and wise have known for many years that Roulette has achilles heels. And if you look deep enough into it you literally take randoms legs away altogether. For some years I suspected random has trouble doing certain things with consistent efficiency, so as to be exploitable in a profitting method. But Now I absolutely know it has a limit it simply cannot go beyond not today, not ever. And this one will ONCE AND FOR ALL, Tell Bayes and his ilk whether RNGS do indeed cheat. Including the beloved BV. Because if this loses even on an RNG. You know it cheats PERIOD.
This method never loses PERIOD. Sunday its yours to do as you will with, ignore it, use it. But don't you ever tell me or anyone else a HOLY GRAIL doesn't exist.
:-X
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jun 29, 06:10 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jun 29, 03:59 PM 2011
I recommend playing two consecutive games then SHUTTING IT DOWN. Such application has brought me as of today 310 wins ZERO losses. Now to all these naysayers who I feel creeping up on this excellent method. Keep this in your minds. If this method wins 81 times to every losing game. It has roulette beaten. I am now certain it wins a lot more than that WHEN APPLIED PROPERLY.
I only have one method in my bag that I believe OPHIS, BAYES and all the others steeped in math and bots and the rest will have NOTHING to say other than oh it takes a bit of patience. I already know, and am actually angry with myself for not spotting this before as the results were staring me in the face. But the difference between what I normally do and the method I present on Sunday is you can PLAY IT DAY AND NIGHT. Yes you just read that from me.
You can play this DAY AND NIGHT. And random will have no anwser to it. It exhausts random, it is absolutely a HOLY GRAIL. And no one will refute this within a week or two of it being presented on here. What will continue is the exposure of those who from the get go lack the most essential attribute to conquer this game for the REST OF THEIR LIVES.
Oh yes that will not change. But be sure on Sunday afternoon an ABSOLUTE HOLY GRAIL exists on this forum. Those with the Attribute required WILL NEVER LOSE AGAIN.


One must agree with you JL. This is it!


@amk
i play exactly as JL does only i play only after a complete virtual loss to convince Mr. Random i can take it...


The stuff i posted was a slight variation of the original code but it is not even close to the original. Why? Because patterns repeat more often right after they happen. Don't they?








I BELIEVE IN THE HOLY GRAIL BECAUSE I HAVE EXPERIENCED IT.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ophis on Jun 29, 06:37 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jun 29, 03:59 PM 2011
...I believe OPHIS, BAYES and all the others steeped in math and bots and the rest will have NOTHING to say other than oh it takes a bit of patience....
But be sure on Sunday afternoon an ABSOLUTE HOLY GRAIL exists on this forum.

I said to myself that i wont be posing any more negative comments or any kind of charts because they are not constructive and only lead to complete destruction of any method that some day may evolve in to something amazing.

But this look like a clear provocation.  ;) Looking forward to see what you got there John.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bayes on Jun 30, 02:32 AM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jun 29, 03:59 PM 2011
I recommend playing two consecutive games then SHUTTING IT DOWN. Such application has brought me as of today 310 wins ZERO losses. Now to all these naysayers who I feel creeping up on this excellent method. Keep this in your minds. If this method wins 81 times to every losing game. It has roulette beaten. I am now certain it wins a lot more than that WHEN APPLIED PROPERLY.
I only have one method in my bag that I believe OPHIS, BAYES and all the others steeped in math and bots and the rest will have NOTHING to say other than oh it takes a bit of patience. I already know, and am actually angry with myself for not spotting this before as the results were staring me in the face. But the difference between what I normally do and the method I present on Sunday is you can PLAY IT DAY AND NIGHT. Yes you just read that from me.
You can play this DAY AND NIGHT. And random will have no anwser to it. It exhausts random, it is absolutely a HOLY GRAIL. And no one will refute this within a week or two of it being presented on here. What will continue is the exposure of those who from the get go lack the most essential attribute to conquer this game for the REST OF THEIR LIVES.
Oh yes that will not change. But be sure on Sunday afternoon an ABSOLUTE HOLY GRAIL exists on this forum. Those with the Attribute required WILL NEVER LOSE AGAIN.

Looking forward to it JL.

My issue you with you is mainly that you hype things up so much, it's actually fun to read your posts but you have to remember that crying wolf will bite you in the arse eventually.

Take this latest holy grail, you've said that you've only just thought of it, and yet you claim that YOU WILL NEVER LOSE AGAIN. Come off it mate, we're not all st*pid here. How can you possibly know that given that you can't have had much time to test it? unless you've simulated it over millions of spins but that seems unlikely given what you think of computers.

Actually, that's not the only issue, you say "WHEN APPLIED PROPERLY" but you never actually say what PROPERLY means. When someone points out the obvious, like the fact that all patterns are equally likely, or the order that the patterns come in is also equally likely, you then add this clause of using the method PROPERLY which seems to make the difference between actually making a  profit or not. It's not surprising that people get irritated because they're not getting the same results as you claim to for lack of playing PROPERLY, so it seems as though you're either winding people up or withholding the full details, in which case it just seems to be a 'teaser'.

See what I mean?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: superman on Jun 30, 03:40 AM 2011
@ jl, I also look forward to Sunday now, 1st question, why the wait until Sunday? 2nd question is a bit longer. when you make your first post for the HG that you have, after 10/20/30 pages of posts, how much will the method have changed by then, the track record for your methods over the last year has been for them to morph and morph some more until everyone loses interest, or sees the light (that went out long ago)

As you know whatever you post will be tested by many, there are already comments being made about your hype systems, people losing money trying to make them work etc etc

Fingers crossed mate
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 30, 11:39 AM 2011
Quote from: Bayes on Jun 30, 02:32 AM 2011
Looking forward to it JL.

My issue you with you is mainly that you hype things up so much, it's actually fun to read your posts but you have to remember that crying wolf will bite you in the arse eventually.

Take this latest holy grail, you've said that you've only just thought of it, and yet you claim that YOU WILL NEVER LOSE AGAIN. Come off it mate, we're not all st*pid here. How can you possibly know that given that you can't have had much time to test it? unless you've simulated it over millions of spins but that seems unlikely given what you think of computers.

Actually, that's not the only issue, you say "WHEN APPLIED PROPERLY" but you never actually say what PROPERLY means. When someone points out the obvious, like the fact that all patterns are equally likely, or the order that the patterns come in is also equally likely, you then add this clause of using the method PROPERLY which seems to make the difference between actually making a  profit or not. It's not surprising that people get irritated because they're not getting the same results as you claim to for lack of playing PROPERLY, so it seems as though you're either winding people up or withholding the full details, in which case it just seems to be a 'teaser'.

See what I mean?
No not really Bayes. When I use the term APPLIED PROPERLY. I mean as I play it. If someone spends five hours playing CODE 4 or PATTERN breaker they will not get the same results I or others get playing hit and run. HOW DO I KNOW THIS BAYES? I know because ive already tested it in long drawn out sessions.

This is why I already know Hit and run is a superior application for nearly every method.

Now regarding my boast of a grail on the horizon. I didnt just think it up Bayes. Its always been there I just didnt see it. Its there in over 25,000 spins I have recorded. And I know of at least ONE MEMBER on this forum who will kick himself when I present it. Because he will be surprised he didnt see it either.

But here is what blows me away. Its a natural occurance that random simply produces. And its the end game for me it really is. And its the mother of all Matrixes. The final chapter to the concept Atlantis, Twister and myself forged some months back.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 30, 11:57 AM 2011
Quote from: superman on Jun 30, 03:40 AM 2011
@ jl, I also look forward to Sunday now, 1st question, why the wait until Sunday? 2nd question is a bit longer. when you make your first post for the method that you have, after 10/20/30 pages of posts, how much will the method have changed by then, the track record for your methods over the last year has been for them to morph and morph some more until everyone loses interest, or sees the light (that went out long ago)

As you know whatever you post will be tested by many, there are already comments being made about your hype systems, people losing money trying to make them work etc etc

Fingers crossed mate
Superman how delightful to hear from you, what BETTER DAY TO PRESENT A HOLY GRAIL?. Morph? Tell me how I morphed PATTERN BREAKER. I'm still playing it exactly as I did three years ago when it was conceived. Its others who tweak and go off on a tangent. Sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse. You see Superman, people don't see that beating this game has a price. TIME.

They think they can cheat it, cut corners. NO, Roulettes beatable alright longterm. But you can't rush success. PATTERN BREAKER is the most random method you can have. You let random do its thing. And 21--81 spins later it selects your bet for you. And you win around 15 times out of every 16 games.

The matrix identifies virtual limits that random has, points it cannot go beyond very often. BUT STILL, people want more. THEY WANT SOMETHING THAT NEVER LOSES.

And now Superman. You shall have it. But can you guess what the PRICE IS?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: superman on Jun 30, 12:45 PM 2011
QuoteBut can you guess what the PRICE IS?

Time?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Aleexx on Jun 30, 12:48 PM 2011
what is the bankroll required to start playn like this?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 30, 01:07 PM 2011
:)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Jun 30, 02:24 PM 2011
Hello everybody

Just of the subject. Played streets @ PP Slingshot just a while ago. This happened 2 11 12 5 4 6 10 7 8 1 9 3  ;D Im serious  I was tempted 2 bet after 10 different ones showed up but backed off  ;D It took only around 5000 spins   :question:   Be careful out there

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 30, 03:39 PM 2011
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Jun 30, 02:24 PM 2011
Hello everybody

Just of the subject. Played streets @ PP Slingshot just a while ago. This happened 2 11 12 5 4 6 10 7 8 1 9 3  ;D I'm serious  I was tempted 2 bet after 10 different ones showed up but backed off  ;D It took only around 5000 spins   :question:   Be careful out there

Regards
Robeenhuut, that is a rare sequence 12 streets in 12 spins. But that is EXACTLY why I advocate Hit and run. The chances of you running into rare sequences likes that becomes even more remote. Its going to be funny watching the bot boys try to take the Holy Grail apart. I already know its supernova proof with a mere 63 units on the line. Roll on Sunday. Saturday is PHASE 3 DAY.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Jun 30, 04:16 PM 2011
I play for 20 units per game betting every line

a)1A1A
b)2B2B
c)3C3C
against a)
against b)
against c)

and so on

So far, 200 games played no loss

a loss will come eventually but i am moving forward in my BR nevertheless.

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jun 30, 04:20 PM 2011
Quote from: vundarosa on Jun 30, 04:16 PM 2011
I play for 20 units per game betting every line

a)1A1A
b)2B2B
c)3C3C
against a)
against b)
against c)

and so on

So far, 200 games played no loss

a loss will come eventually but i am moving forward in my BR nevertheless.

vundarosa
Okay but be careful Vundarosa. I play two games consecutively then STOP. But I always record 5 consecutive games. To confirm to myself that the way I play is the best application. And it is, had I played all five games. I would now have three losses. Short and sweet people. That is the power application for this method.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 30, 07:21 PM 2011
Hello Superman.........

JL's method is being released on the 3rd so we can celebrate on the *4*rth......

You of all people should surely know this.......
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 30, 08:38 PM 2011
Hello Bayes, just for arguments sake.....

Haven't casinos proven that you can win with roulette in the longterm......

If only the zero is allowing casinos to win all you have to do is cover it........

We all agree that there are "good" methods and just bad ones........

Methods which have proven to be exceptional can only have longterm success...........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jun 30, 09:09 PM 2011

@John

what is the indicator you do not enter the distribution in a bad run?


I have perfect success with it but i play after that bad run occur. So i guess the Hit & Run trick has nothing to do with it. I understand you do think so, but as an experienced player you seem to be and with all the drive you show to beat this game you should humbly think about getting some more plausible mechanism of evaluating the distribution.
Is there any logical (scientific) proof that play with intermittence brings more hit ratio than not?
I think this is the question people are making since the beginning and you do not answer directly.


I also can show my results here to everyone check them out. They are too good to be true. Maybe i got lucky. But that per se doesn't constitute valid proof.


Zer0Blue
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 30, 09:42 PM 2011
JohnLegend, if I may....

Zeroblue, I think the principle behind HIT AND RUN is that you are increasing your chances of avoiding a loss....

For example, we have looked at 5000 Live Spielbank spins and we see the following PATTERN consistently......

LWLWLWWWWWWLWLLWWWWWWWWWWWLWWWWWWWWLWWWWWWWWWWLWLWWLW

Yes... if I played this method continually I would not like the results...however if I had to throw a dart at this sequence 5 times I feel confident I would not HIT an L to often.......
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jun 30, 10:07 PM 2011
i see were you come from.
put it this way. if you have any method that wins consistently it doesn't matter when or where the losses come.


in your dart shooting you have 75% odds of hitting a winning game. and that is all. that does not constitute any increase in the expectancy.


if i play it continuously i will have the same 75% odds.
throw the dart 11 games of 5 throws each and you come out with the same results.


The only thing achieved is the mental delay of those odds.


Are you acquainted with the concept of Personal Permanence?


Zer0Blue
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jun 30, 10:22 PM 2011
I agree,

However, JohnLegend has won for many years....

One thing is for certain only the longterm will tell...........

At which point do we say we have a winning method, 1 week,  1 month, 1 year.......

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jul 01, 12:29 AM 2011
1000 flat bets


100 profit

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bayes on Jul 01, 01:58 AM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 30, 08:38 PM 2011

If only the zero is allowing casinos to win all you have to do is cover it........


The problem there is that when the zero wins it only pays out 35-1, so it doesn't really help. It's not really the zero which creates the house edge but the relation between the payoff and the probability of a hit. Covering the zero might seem to be the solution for outside bets but all it's really doing is adding to the total chip value on the table.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bayes on Jul 01, 02:04 AM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 30, 09:42 PM 2011
Zeroblue, I think the principle behind HIT AND RUN is that you are increasing your chances of avoiding a loss....

And just HOW does it do that? to me the whole idea of hit and run is Alice in Wonderland logic, I think it's just one of those myths created by gamblers, and there seems to be no coherent definition of what it actually is.



Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ophis on Jul 01, 07:57 AM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 30, 10:22 PM 2011
I agree,

However, JohnLegend has won for many years....

One thing is for certain only the longterm will tell...........

At which point do we say we have a winning method, 1 week,  1 month, 1 year.......


This reminds me of F_LAT_INO which was winning for over 3 years with a method.... and then he lost 18000 Euro. (if i remember correctly)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 01, 11:13 AM 2011
Hello Bayes and Ophis,

Thanks for your insights.......

I think Flatino would have been alright if he hadn't increased his chip value drastically, I think this was a money management problem.........

HIT AND RUN I think can best be described as playing at a very short spurts.....

If you are playing with a system which has a 80 to 1 odds just 5 times per day spread out through the day you are limiting your exposure....  I think it just comes down to **exposure**.. The more times somebody crosses a busy street in a day the more dangerous it becomes......


ZeroBlue, did you mean that if we flat bet for 1000 games and win +100 units we have ourselves a winning system? My records show this.......  I will double check them and post.........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: superman on Jul 01, 11:24 AM 2011
QuoteI think it just comes down to **exposure**.. The more times somebody crosses a busy street in a day the more dangerous it becomes

But the first crossing could be the one time the damn bus arrived earlier, MM is key, exposure is a neccessity, you will only know if it was the wrong time AFTER the fact as usual sadly.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 01, 11:37 AM 2011
Zeroblue, your own results show that you would have won +100 units flat betting, correct?

Hello Superman, ya, always have to look left then right......

With exposure I was only referring to actual time played, one game is very little exposure, you back track 12 spins, play 4 spins and your out.... or 8 spins a JL plays. So actual playing time is 4 to 8 minutes

As JohnLegend himself says if he were to play 5 games ie 12 more spins he would have lost 3 times by now, total playing time 20 minutes,    so time exposure is the key........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 01, 07:24 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 30, 09:42 PM 2011
JohnLegend, if I may....

Zeroblue, I think the principle behind HIT AND RUN is that you are increasing your chances of avoiding a loss....

For example, we have looked at 5000 Live Spielbank spins and we see the following PATTERN consistently......

LWLWLWWWWWWLWLLWWWWWWWWWWWLWWWWWWWWLWWWWWWWWWWLWLWWLW

Yes... if I played this method continually I would not like the results...however if I had to throw a dart at this sequence 5 times I feel confident I would not HIT an L to often.......
Spot on AMK, its plain common sense really. But often those with rigidly logical thinking lack that to some degree. Aside from the method I drop on here on Sunday. Hit and run is the superior application for methods like PATTERN BREAKER, CODE 4, DIVIDE AND CONQUER, and of course PATTERN 4. It simply works, you will land between losing games more often than you land ON THEM. that's the plain fact Bayes. I have 16 years of experience playing both ways. I could never get an edge longterm playing STRAIGHT.
Casinos know this, but if the player has a decent method and THE DISCIPLINE to play HIT AND RUN. Winning isnt a maybe its a certainty. You will definately produce superior results that go beyond break even point. Then using smart money management you go clear in profit margin.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Smee on Jul 01, 10:51 PM 2011
Heres my theory on hit and run - if you play a matrix system with odds of losing of 1 in 80, you will lose on average once every 80 spins. This is what I have seen from my own experiments playing with odds of 1 in 2, 1 in 4, 1 in 8, 1 in 16 etc right up to 1 in 512. I still lost the progression roughly once in whatever the odds were.

If you play CONSTANTLY for 80 spins you will lose roughly in one session. Playing hit and run say 1 game per day for 80 sessions - your only delaying the inevitable because it will still lose once. Maybe it just takes you 80 days....

The exposure to the spins is the same - 80 spins is 80 spins whether you spread it out over time or not, and random is random. It dosnt change just because you play on and off...Any number can come up any time you are playing.

This is why I believe the simulated spins for thousands of spins is a valuable tool to tell if a system holds up before i blow my cash on a system that sounds excellent but isnt tried. Playing hit and run is just going to take you longer to realise it dosnt hold up - but I had a lot of fun playing it and tweaking it over the last few months, and i have learnt a lot.

And for that alone I really appreciate JohnLegends and the other guys hard work.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jul 01, 11:43 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jul 01, 07:24 PM 2011
Spot on AMK, its plain common sense really. But often those with rigidly logical thinking lack that to some degree. Aside from the method I drop on here on Sunday. Hit and run is the superior application for methods like PATTERN BREAKER, CODE 4, DIVIDE AND CONQUER, and of course PATTERN 4. It simply works, you will land between losing games more often than you land ON THEM. that's the plain fact Bayes. I have 16 years of experience playing both ways. I could never get an edge longterm playing STRAIGHT.
Casinos know this, but if the player has a decent method and THE DISCIPLINE to play HIT AND RUN. Winning isnt a maybe its a certainty. You will definately produce superior results that go beyond break even point. Then using smart money management you go clear in profit margin.
I have no interest in saying that these methods have no merit. They do. For several reasons that are obvious and i will not focus on that.
Although i think they are no better than any Random Vs Random Method. I can give examples on this if it is necessary. But i will not focus on this either.

The center of discussion seems to be that It is an unproved claim. I realize that John has his own dogmas regarding this game, as any other player creates their own based on personal experience. I really admire the drive JL has in beating the game, and maybe the way he hypes his interventions here, gives courage to many people.
But i am afraid we are running in circles.


Keeping this in the field of healthy discussion, i would ask if anyone can make a substantial proof of such claim.


"HIT & RUN raises odds expectation."


It would be a real turn point in the way we face the game.


Otherwise it will remain forever in the speculation world, and both sides of the opinion will never advance.


Anyone has a valid hypothesis to submit with verifiable results?
If there is genuine interest on this we should open a new thread. :thumbsup:

Good Luck
Zer0Blue
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bayes on Jul 02, 03:49 AM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jul 01, 07:24 PM 2011
Spot on AMK, its plain common sense really. But often those with rigidly logical thinking lack that to some degree. Aside from the method I drop on here on Sunday. Hit and run is the superior application for methods like PATTERN BREAKER, CODE 4, DIVIDE AND CONQUER, and of course PATTERN 4. It simply works, you will land between losing games more often than you land ON THEM. that's the plain fact Bayes. I have 16 years of experience playing both ways. I could never get an edge longterm playing STRAIGHT.

Sometimes  common sense can lead you astray, and you need to use 'rigidly logical' thinking to get you back on track. This is a case in point. The notion of time is a red herring in this discussion - the bottom line is the number of spins you play . So how long should you leave between hit and run sessions in terms of the number of spins? You realise the absurdity of the position if you try to justify the answer to this question. 10 spins? 20? 100? why should the choice of one be preferable to another unless you're using some other criteria as your entry point into a game.

JL, if you're getting superior results playing hit and run it must be because of some other factor which you haven't told us about. As Smee has pointed out, the only 'advantage' is delaying the inevitable. If you only play 2 or 3 games per day and your entry into the game is random, it won't make any difference to the final results than if you played 20 games per day, or continuously, the only difference is it will take longer to lose.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bayes on Jul 02, 03:55 AM 2011
Quote from: ZeroBlue on Jul 01, 11:43 PM 2011
The center of discussion seems to be that It is an unproved claim. I realize that John has his own dogmas regarding this game, as any other player creates their own based on personal experience. I really admire the drive JL has in beating the game, and maybe the way he hypes his interventions here, gives courage to many people.
But i am afraid we are running in circles.


Keeping this in the field of healthy discussion, i would ask if anyone can make a substantial proof of such claim.


"HIT & RUN raises odds expectation."


It would be a real turn point in the way we face the game.


Otherwise it will remain forever in the speculation world, and both sides of the opinion will never advance.


Anyone has a valid hypothesis to submit with verifiable results?
If there is genuine interest on this we should open a new thread. :thumbsup:

Good Luck
Zer0Blue

Well said. To keep this forum alive it needs to ruthlessly weed out those approaches which don't work or are based on fallacies. If no-one speaks out or challenges unproven dogma then we're doomed to endlessly regurgitate the same old failed systems. The newbies deserve better than that.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 02, 02:59 PM 2011
Hello Bayes and ZeroBlue,

This will be the last of my thoughts about playing styles on this thread. Perhaps ZeroBlue can take the lead and start a new "Philosophies" thread......  I just really enjoy playing, discussing and creating methods :) Love hearing from the likes of Bayes, ZeroBlue, Hermes, JohnLegend, Proofreader, XXVV, the list goes on......

If for example we analyze 5000 perhaps 10000 spins and see a consistent pattern of wins and loses, as I mentioned earlier

WWWLWWWLWWWWWWLWWWWWWWWWLLWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWLWWWWWWWLW

I would expect that the next 5000 or 10000 spins analyzed will show the same pattern. Yes perhaps somewhere, someone will see as short spell of  WWLLWWWLWLLLLWWWLLWWLLLLWW

The vast majority of spins will have the same consistent pattern/flow.........

Each day I, as I like to term it, I through 5 darts at this pattern, a consistent pattern. Then I am not adding up spins in the conventional sense as playing 100 spins straight. Even after I have thrown my darts 100 times I haven't thrown them at a fluctuating pattern, I have kept throwing them at the same pattern...  This pattern has no memory and the odds always remain in my favor.........

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Jul 02, 04:20 PM 2011
"If you only play 2 or 3 games per day and your entry into the game is random, it won't make any difference to the final results than if you played 20 games per day, or continuously, the only difference is it will take longer to lose."

--------------

good point!

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Jul 02, 04:40 PM 2011
Quote from: vundarosa on Jun 30, 04:16 PM 2011
I play for 20 units per game betting every line

a)1A1A
b)2B2B
c)3C3C
against a)
against b)
against c)

and so on

So far, 200 games played no loss

a loss will come eventually but i am moving forward in my BR nevertheless.

vundarosa


-------------

I've now found my first loss...., playing for 15-20u per section.

240 Games won
1 loss --120u lost
Max profit before loss: 254u
Total profit: +134u

zero appeared in the second bet, i only cover zero on 3rd and 4th bets. Maybe need to cover zero from second bet onwards...


vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 02, 05:03 PM 2011
Quote from: Bayes on Jul 02, 03:49 AM 2011
Sometimes  common sense can lead you astray, and you need to use 'rigidly logical' thinking to get you back on track. This is a case in point. The notion of time is a red herring in this discussion - the bottom line is the number of spins you play . So how long should you leave between hit and run sessions in terms of the number of spins? You realise the absurdity of the position if you try to justify the answer to this question. 10 spins? 20? 100? why should the choice of one be preferable to another unless you're using some other criteria as your entry point into a game.

JL, if you're getting superior results playing hit and run it must be because of some other factor which you haven't told us about. As Smee has pointed out, the only 'advantage' is delaying the inevitable. If you only play 2 or 3 games per day and your entry into the game is random, it won't make any difference to the final results than if you played 20 games per day, or continuously, the only difference is it will take longer to lose.
I'm afraid you are very wrong on those assumptions Bayes. Example of what I would get if I played for intance PATTERN BREAKER, Consecutively.

WWWWWWWLWWWWWWWWWLWWLWWWWWWWWWWLWWWWWWLWWWL

WWWWWWWWWWWWLWWWWWWWLWWWWLWWWWWWWWWWWWLWWWL

That would be a typical result if I played PATTERN BREAKER all day long
You would seldom win more than 12 or so games in a row. NOW, my results for the last 70 odd games I played.

WWWWWWLWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWLWWWWWLWWWWWWW

WWWWWWWWLWWWWWWLWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWLWWW

As you can see you still get the typical 5 or 6 wins then a loss. BUT, the difference is when a long streak developes it goes on longer than it ever would if you played consecutively. That is the crux of why HIT AND RUN produces a superior strikerate. You are landing on winning games MORE than you would playing straight. Its that simple. Call it timing, luck whatever you like. that's what happens. Why that's so difficult for people to take onboard is beyond me. But I have been playing this way for the last 7 years with VASTLY superior results to what straight play used to bring me.
And that's with a method that has paper odds of 7/1. With code 4 you have paper odds of 80/1. The chances of finding a losing game are so much more remote when you play 2 by 2 as I do. Then a 4 figured strikerate becomes more than a pipe dream. I always aim for a strikerate around double that of the paper odds. I have it with the PATTERN BREAKER/4. And I am going way beyond my expectations with CODE 4. I would be happy with 160/1. But I am approaching 400 games no loss. And its not that they don't happen. I have 3 recorded. The thing is I wasn't home. My session was over and I was merely an observer. TWO BY TWO people.

That discipline to shut it down and come back later is PRICELESS. One other thing stop getting hung up on this 20,40 etc spins later branch. its not the reason HIT AND RUN works. It works as I explained because you are far more likely to be landing on a winning game more than you would if you played consecutively.

Consecutively you are on randoms track. When it decides its going to loserville you have no choice. Loserville it is. Playing hit and run. You are the passenger who gets off the train more often before it reaches loserville. You stop off in winnersville more often, before the last stop. Think it over. The casinos will do whatever they can to keep a high roller playing at their tables. They know the likely outcome if they do. I have seen a player walk into a casino, play one game for a 200 units return every day of the week. Then stop and enjoy the rest of the evening at the bar. I have seen people win more in a day than some people earn in a year, only to leave 7 or 8 hours later not able to afford their taxi fare home.

I PLAY HIT AND RUN for one reason, and one reason only, IT WORKS. If there was a way for me to spend 8 consecutive hours playing and winning if I chose to. Id be on it. Well there is, Its coming tomorrow. 
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: viclimks on Jul 03, 03:35 AM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jul 02, 05:03 PM 2011
I'm afraid you are very wrong on those assumptions Bayes. Example of what I would get if I played for intance PATTERN BREAKER, Consecutively.

WWWWWWWLWWWWWWWWWLWWLWWWWWWWWWWLWWWWWWLWWWL

WWWWWWWWWWWWLWWWWWWWLWWWWLWWWWWWWWWWWWLWWWL

That would be a typical result if I played PATTERN BREAKER all day long
You would seldom win more than 12 or so games in a row. NOW, my results for the last 70 odd games I played.

WWWWWWLWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWLWWWWWLWWWWWWW

WWWWWWWWLWWWWWWLWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWLWWW

As you can see you still get the typical 5 or 6 wins then a loss. BUT, the difference is when a long streak developes it goes on longer than it ever would if you played consecutively. That is the crux of why HIT AND RUN produces a superior strikerate. You are landing on winning games MORE than you would playing straight. Its that simple. Call it timing, luck whatever you like. that's what happens. Why that's so difficult for people to take onboard is beyond me. But I have been playing this way for the last 7 years with VASTLY superior results to what straight play used to bring me.
And that's with a method that has paper odds of 7/1. With code 4 you have paper odds of 80/1. The chances of finding a losing game are so much more remote when you play 2 by 2 as I do. Then a 4 figured strikerate becomes more than a pipe dream. I always aim for a strikerate around double that of the paper odds. I have it with the PATTERN BREAKER/4. And I am going way beyond my expectations with CODE 4. I would be happy with 160/1. But I am approaching 400 games no loss. And its not that they don't happen. I have 3 recorded. The thing is I wasn't home. My session was over and I was merely an observer. TWO BY TWO people.

That discipline to shut it down and come back later is PRICELESS. One other thing stop getting hung up on this 20,40 etc spins later branch. its not the reason HIT AND RUN works. It works as I explained because you are far more likely to be landing on a winning game more than you would if you played consecutively.

Consecutively you are on randoms track. When it decides its going to loserville you have no choice. Loserville it is. Playing hit and run. You are the passenger who gets off the train more often before it reaches loserville. You stop off in winnersville more often, before the last stop. Think it over. The casinos will do whatever they can to keep a high roller playing at their tables. They know the likely outcome if they do. I have seen a player walk into a casino, play one game for a 200 units return every day of the week. Then stop and enjoy the rest of the evening at the bar. I have seen people win more in a day than some people earn in a year, only to leave 7 or 8 hours later not able to afford their taxi fare home.

I PLAY HIT AND RUN for one reason, and one reason only, IT WORKS. If there was a way for me to spend 8 consecutive hours playing and winning if I chose to. Id be on it. Well there is, Its coming tomorrow.
JL,Cheers to u...... :thumbsup:
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bayes on Jul 03, 03:57 AM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jul 02, 05:03 PM 2011
As you can see you still get the typical 5 or 6 wins then a loss. BUT, the difference is when a long streak developes it goes on longer than it ever would if you played consecutively. That is the crux of why HIT AND RUN produces a superior strikerate.

JL, you haven't given a reason why the strike rate should be higher, you've just given a sample of wins and losses (which really means nothing). Why will a winning streak go on longer if 'broken up'? you have no answer to that because there is no answer, it defies all logic. All we have is your claim that you have won using this method, but no-one else seems to be getting the same results.

I have more questions, but since your new system doesn't rely on hit and run, I won't bother with them, for now...

Looking forward to testing the new system.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Jul 03, 09:20 AM 2011
Quote from: Bayes on Jul 03, 03:57 AM 2011
JL, you haven't given a reason why the strike rate should be higher, you've just given a sample of wins and losses (which really means nothing). Why will a winning streak go on longer if 'broken up'? you have no answer to that because there is no answer, it defies all logic. All we have is your claim that you have won using this method, but no-one else seems to be getting the same results.

I have more questions, but since your new system doesn't rely on hit and run, I won't bother with them, for now...


Looking forward to testing the new system.

Hello Bayes

And what reason would satisfy u? 100000 spins sample.... I don't think so because you know the answer. Why don't you commission a scientific paper "How 2 beat probability odds playing short hit and run sessions"?  I heard this argument before - yeah he is successful playing this system but wait few more days - he is due 2 lose big sooner or later. Here goes yr 100000 sample....
And i have some stats matching JL numbers. By the way i lost First ever game played Code 4  :) Now I'm ahead and creeping upwards. But yeah u know that I'm due soon again.

I'm not JL buddy. I think that he maybe unnecessarily over-hypes his methods so some people may feel some letdown. But we r not in PR discussion here  :)

I feel that his methods have lots of merit and played extremely short sessions should produce winning results LONG TERM unless somebody proves me wrong. How about you? Its so easy 2 be negative.

I wish everybody a good day.

 
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 03, 11:26 AM 2011
Quote from: Bayes on Jul 03, 03:57 AM 2011
JL, you haven't given a reason why the strike rate should be higher, you've just given a sample of wins and losses (which really means nothing). Why will a winning streak go on longer if 'broken up'? you have no answer to that because there is no answer, it defies all logic. All we have is your claim that you have won using this method, but no-one else seems to be getting the same results.

I have more questions, but since your new system doesn't rely on hit and run, I won't bother with them, for now...

Looking forward to testing the new system.
O
I have but you are unwilling to accept it as it goes against all you hold dear. I'm not going to even bother posting anymore methods on this forum. If you cannot take onboard that randomly hitting random for one or two games can produce superior results. To sitting there waiting for the crash.

I'm involved in an excercise of absolute futility. I have nothing to gain by making up anything here. I tell it as it happens. If you can't see that I'm not going to push it anymore. I have more important things pending.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: joiner29 on Jul 03, 11:32 AM 2011
JL you should not be bothered by these people, they only get their kicks by posting rubbish and trying to belittle other peoples systems. I dont see them posting anything like the consistant methods you post, please keep up the great work
tom
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bayes on Jul 03, 11:57 AM 2011
Hi Robeenhuut,

Sorry you feel I'm being negative, I just thought I was pointing out the obvious. If I thought  maths told the whole story I wouldn't be wasting my time playing roulette, and I wouldn't be winning. I know it's possible to win consistently but hit and run isn't the way forward, it really isn't.

I'm not familiar with all JL's systems, I just know that hit and run is an essential component in them. If he's winning with them then it's due to some other reason. For example, he's compiled stats on how often he will get consecutive losses and he uses fairly heavy progressions, that's the only reason he's winning in my opinion.

What reason would satisfy me?  if there were some kind of trigger to start playing the system based on stats, is one example. But JL says you can enter the game at any point, in other words - randomly. So according to him you can walk up to a table anytime to start play, and you will win more games in the long run by only playing 1 or 2 games, and then leaving the table and coming back X spins later, than if you played 10 or 20 games consecutively without a break. This is what gives you the advantage, according to the hit and run dogma - the mere fact that you're taking  breaks between games.

So someone who plays 20 games in a row is much more likely to fail than someone who plays the 20 games only a couple at a time, even though they've both played exactly the same number of spins. That's important to notice, because the hit and run crowd maintain that the main reason it gives an advantage is because they're not in the game long enough for them to come up against the house edge or the losing runs.

There are just as many losing streaks as winning streaks for any system (in terms of what matters - the payouts). Playing 20 games one after the other, you're just as likely to have picked a winning streak for the system as a losing streak, so there is no reason to believe that hit and run is better. It's really no different than trying to guess whether the next spin is red or black, in terms of whether your random entry point results in wins or losses.

That this is all undeniable assuming you enter the game randomly, which JL says he does.




Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bayes on Jul 03, 12:06 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jul 03, 11:26 AM 2011
I have but you are unwilling to accept it as it goes against all you hold dear. I'm not going to even bother posting anymore methods on this forum. If you cannot take onboard that randomly hitting random for one or two games can produce superior results. To sitting there waiting for the crash.

I'm involved in an excercise of absolute futility. I have nothing to gain by making up anything here. I tell it as it happens. If you can't see that I'm not going to push it anymore. I have more important things pending.

Don't give me that cr*p JL, now you're just throwing your toys out of the pram.  ::)

Take it on the chin and stop trying to make a scapegoat out of me, everyone is encouraged to post systems, but I'm not going to sit idly by and accept what I know to be nonsense, and hit and run is nonsense.

QuoteTo sitting there waiting for the crash

See? this is the heart of it, but I've just explained in my previous post why it's invalid.  You are no more 'waiting for the crash' by playing consecutive sessions than by playing hit and run.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jul 03, 12:15 PM 2011
I think it better to follow the rules JL laid down for this. Seems logically safer to me...
Anyhow, John - it is Sunday at last - What is name of new method? :)

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: LuckyLucy on Jul 03, 12:26 PM 2011
At the end of the day Bayes, none of us are experts at Roulette, otherwise we wouldnt need to create  systems and methods, we would know exactly what to do on every spin and never have any losses.

If someone has a system that works in the long term for them whatever that maybe, just because you dont agree, that is just YOUR opinion, that doesnt constitute it to be nonesense.

If you feel you have a better system that works consistantly, why not post it and share it with us all?

Keep up the good work, not just JL but everyone that contributes to this forum, sharing ideas, trying to help others.

To the doom merchants out there, why can't you offer critique to help try improve a method, not belittle their efforts and ideas, we should be working to the common good.

Lets all work together and beat our common enemy the casino not each other!
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 03, 12:48 PM 2011
Hello everyone,

I guess we will just have to agree that we disagree........

Everybody has there point of view and we now know we have for and against HIT AND RUN....

Hope we can now continue on with posting results and ideas about CODE 4 and if we are still lucky enough JohnLegends new method :)

Please don't feel discouraged JohnLegend, many of us are here in full support and would be very sad if you left us........

Hope we may hear from you soon again....

Wishing everybody a great 4rth of July
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bayes on Jul 03, 12:50 PM 2011
Hi Lucy,

It isn't just my opinion, hit and run really doesn't work. So am I not allowed to criticise a system unless I have something better to share?

I haven't attacked JL or made any personal remarks, he's perfectly free to discuss and put his arguments forward, but so far he hasn't, nor does he seem interested in doing so. It wasn't my intention to accuse him of making stuff up, and I welcome any other members coming forward to back up his results.

I'm not a 'doom merchant', and yes I do have approaches which win consistently, but this isn't the thread to share them.

This is supposed to be a forum, not just a repository of systems, that means we should be able to be grown-up and have sensible debates. If they get heated now and again, well, that's life. As long as we don't stoop to insults and making personal attacks then it's all good.  :thumbsup:

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bayes on Jul 03, 12:53 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jul 03, 12:48 PM 2011
I guess we will just have to agree that we disagree........

Ok, that's probably the best thing to do. If I've offended John, I'd like to apologise.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: warrior on Jul 03, 01:04 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jul 03, 12:48 PM 2011
Hello everyone,

I guess we will just have to agree that we disagree........

Everybody has there point of view and we now know we have for and against HIT AND RUN....

Hope we can now continue on with posting results and ideas about CODE 4 and if we are still lucky enough JohnLegends new method :)

Please don't feel discouraged JohnLegend, many of us are here in full support and would be very sad if you left us........

Hope we may hear from you soon again....

Wishing everybody a great 4rth of July
John does not get offended that easy trust me.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: D1 on Jul 03, 01:07 PM 2011
Regardless of what anyone thinks I for one and I'm sure there are others would like to hear what you have To say JL.

And I think the moderators should take a hand in it if anyone is going to be put off posting because they are being put down before they are even given a chance to show what they have.

I put post up for Drazen the other day just to have a sarcastic comment posted behind it when all I was trying to do was to explain to him what I had seen on several occasions whilst playing roulette.

D1.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bayes on Jul 03, 01:19 PM 2011
Come on people, let's not be too sensitive. One thing I will admit is that if you believe in hit and run and play that way, it won't make your chances any worse.  ;)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bayes on Jul 03, 01:23 PM 2011
Ok, this is the dilemma. I have tested PATTERN 4, both hit and run and 'continuously' and there was no difference in the results. John claims otherwise. What am I to conclude? it works for him but doesn't work for me? what use is a system which works for one person but not another?

Now, John would maintain that I wasn't playing it 'properly', but I've followed his directions to the letter. Now what?


Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: LuckyLucy on Jul 03, 01:29 PM 2011
 ;)

Well its great that we can a ll work towards the common good! Hugs to you all!

Lucy
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: superman on Jul 03, 01:37 PM 2011
Quotebut I've followed his directions to the letter

Yes me too, a few times on different methods, I welcome any new methods, the fact that they get tested thoroughly to death seems to upset a few people, well, I would rather know sooner than later if a method is going to fail eventually.

I think the main problem fo Fender is, the 1st method he gave the forum, The Zone, was so hyped up that the thread grew to a large amount of pages, and the use of certain phraseology "I will personally pay for and take members to vegas and we will kill the casinos etc" but where is the zone now? in the archives.

Anyone who posts what they think is a method worth investigating OR needing further development must know that somebody is going to have a different view to them, that's just life, there will be arguments and heated discussions along the way.

If Fenders new system is going to put 2 fingers up to the nay sayers then why retract it or decide not to post it? afterall this new one is supposed to be for long term use not hit n run, which is the big problem here lately, hit n run seems like scared play to me, but thats another debate completely.

@ John, if what you have is going to do the job, you have plenty of followers here, ignore us that are going to code/bot/run your method until it fails, you say it wont fail, that's what we all hope for, over to you.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: warrior on Jul 03, 01:44 PM 2011
i have been in the  mixed martial arts for over 20 years, one thing for sure   to become a black belt in jiujitsu you need to put your blood on the mat other wise your doomed no easy way ok.in JEET KUNE DO  I STUDIED IT a lot EVEN BEFORE THE UFC was popular,i was applying it on the street,we have a saying,and i will share it with all of you ,THIS IS A QUOTE FROM MASTER BRUCE LEE ,REJECT WHAT IS USELESS AND ADD WAS IS YOUR OWN ,AND ONLY FROM THAT YOU WILL GROW AS A MARTIAL ARTIST. apply that to all the strategies on this form and you will see what i mean . What does JEET KUNE DO MEAN,the way of the intersepting fist,or foot bruce lee realised that by intersepting an opponent s move as he was about to attack, messes up his train of thought or attack,if you watch a football game or any sports when there is an interseption people go crazy,on the street you better believe it when you jab a guy in the eyes as he is moving he will go down fast , thats is the point of HIT AND RUN GET IN GET OUT ,A FIGHT IS NOT GOING TO last 1 hour it will be over in a few seconds ,I HOPE YOU LEARNEd something about martial arts   i live my life by it WARRIOR.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jul 03, 02:03 PM 2011
stop being childish.  :(


WE post things so we can discuss them wright?


Zer0BLue
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 03, 03:15 PM 2011
Hello ZeroBlue,

Any CODE 4 updates out there yet, ZeroBlue?
You play until a virtual loss then start playing against the next pattern, correct?
Do you just play one game or 2?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Jul 03, 03:17 PM 2011
"So someone who plays 20 games in a row is much more likely to fail than someone who plays the 20 games only a couple at a time, even though they've both played exactly the same number of spins."

-----------

I have to agree with Bayes here. I don't see any difference from playing continuously or hit & run, in the way its defined here, as short play then walk away.

one is equally likely to find the winning/losing spins by playing hit & run or continously...say you play continously, win 10u then have a loss, playing for 2u will not change the fact that next time you play you can have a loss....in fact it might well be that each time you start you'll enter at the wrong time and have a loss after another, while the guy who just started one spin latter is winning time and time again by playing continously...

vundarosa

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 03, 03:23 PM 2011
Hello Vundarosa,

JohnLegends results with HIT AND RUN speak for themself.....
Look at his systems, his updates and the story is clear.....
ZeorBlues own results are astonishing, has any ever heard of 1000 straight wins?
Ofcourse there was a trigger but HIT AND RUN was the key as well....

We can debate for or against but we are just spinning in circles....
All we can do is spin in the fashion we like and update the results.....

Don't give up on us JL........

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Jul 03, 03:51 PM 2011
Maybe all the pattern games can be played continously.....

think of this, what is making us win so often when betting 9 spins latter, against the 1st pattern?! We have players here with nearly the same strike rate but they are not playing the same spins,same table or even at the same time. It must have to do with the probability of the first patter repeating as the 4th pattern. So if one starts at the first spin of the day, he will be as likely to win his game as the next player who started, 1 spin latter, on the second spin of the day. The same would be true for the following player and all the others after him. They will all have different patterns to bet against and with the same probability of winning.

In that case, to play continuously, after a win, one would have to form his new pattern to bet against by moving to one spin apart from the previous pattern.

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Jul 03, 03:56 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jul 03, 03:23 PM 2011
Hello Vundarosa,

JohnLegends results with HIT AND RUN speak for themself.....
Look at his systems, his updates and the story is clear.....
ZeorBlues own results are astonishing, has any ever heard of 1000 straight wins?
Ofcourse there was a trigger but HIT AND RUN was the key as well....

We can debate for or against but we are just spinning in circles....
All we can do is spin in the fashion we like and update the results.....

Don't give up on us JL........

----------------
amk, the results speak because of the way they are presented.
We have to compare aples to aples.....we should not be comparing winning streaks but units won in the same numbers of games played, when played the same way after a loss.

vundarosa



Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bayes on Jul 03, 04:17 PM 2011
Quote from: superman on Jul 03, 01:37 PM 2011
If Fenders new system is going to put 2 fingers up to the nay sayers then why retract it or decide not to post it? afterall this new one is supposed to be for long term use not hit n run, which is the big problem here lately, hit n run seems like scared play to me, but that's another debate completely.

That's what I was wondering. JL seems to think I have some kind of agenda and will try to discredit him whatever he comes up with. That's not the case at all, if he weren't making such a big deal of the hit and run thing then I wouldn't be either, but it just seems to be a cornerstone of all his systems and according to him you ignore it at your peril. If it makes such a difference then what's the purpose of betting 'special' patterns which are designed to 'outsmart' random, why not just constantly bet red + hit 'n' run?

The key to winning is good MM and some indication of when a system is likely to 'turn'. It doesn't matter what it is, PATTERN 4, CODE 2 and all the rest are just as good as any other.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jul 03, 04:31 PM 2011
"HIT & RUN raises odds expectation."  -False.


No big deal. The systems presented still have merit.



Although i think they are no better than any Random Vs Random Method. - True


All systems betting against or in favor of any given pattern have the same hit ratio, because they are based on odds.


If we play one Single EC in patterns of 3 formations



You get 8 combinations


1. RRR
2. RBR
3. RRB
4. RBB
5. BBB
6. BRB
7. BBR
8. BRR

the odds are 1/8

that is set in stone.

You can try different triggers to achieve a better ratio:

Play after 2 consecutive losses. LL then bet and stop on a win.

Wait for a perfect state of balance between the patterns.

Play after a noticeable Ecart and try to catch a correction.

Correlate parameters and raise expectation.
[/size]
[/size]================================================================
[/size]
[/size]Any system should be tested flat bet as a measure of it's efficiency.
[/size]Only then we can make comparisons.
[/size]
[/size]
[/size]Zer0Blue
[/size]



Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: chrisbis on Jul 03, 04:52 PM 2011



@Zer0blue


What's all this "Stuff" mate? (See the attached below)


Was it something you trying to "Paste" into the message?

Or do we have a Forum Code problem Huston?  :question:
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bayes on Jul 03, 05:16 PM 2011
@ Zeroblue, agreed 100%, great post.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jul 03, 06:00 PM 2011
Quote from: chrisbis on Jul 03, 04:52 PM 2011


@Zer0blue


What's all this "Stuff" mate? (See the attached below)


Was it something you trying to "Paste" into the message?

Or do we have a Forum Code problem Huston?  :question:


no. it happens several times to me. i usually edit the post, but this time it passed... :-(


i have to confess i prefer the older interface.


Cheers
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: chrisbis on Jul 03, 06:04 PM 2011
Its early days yet with this one.


though, I know what you mean!


I think its because we were so familiar with it.  :-* I loved it too.


But, hey- progress is progress, As the Turtle said to the Hare!!!  :LoL:
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jul 03, 06:06 PM 2011
@chris


i miss the reveal window when posting.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: chrisbis on Jul 03, 06:13 PM 2011
Quote from: ZeroBlue on Jul 03, 06:06 PM 2011
@chris


i miss the reveal window when posting.


Its coming back.........


Along with a whole host of new ideas I thought up.


And that's the one beauty of this new "Skin", is that it allows Victor, our "In-House" coder, to play with the PHP code, and make up all sorts of new features.


I can now officially ' Let My Mind Wander'.......................he he!!


(just one thing to watch out for, friend, and this goes to ALL fellows posters viewing this message-
When you type the letter U within a message or PM, the Forum code, (at the moment- till its fixed), is deleting the very next letter/word/text after it, when it changes U into 'You'.
You have to edit it, via the Modify button function, and add your words back in again, or type the correct spelling in the first place!!)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: VLS on Jul 03, 06:15 PM 2011
Quote from: chrisbis on Jul 03, 06:13 PM 2011
Its coming back.........


[reveal]It came back! :)[/reveal]


Vic :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: chrisbis on Jul 03, 06:17 PM 2011
Like it!!
(I think, to make it "Look" more- 'Savy', we could get rid of the (click to show/hide) instruction, and maybe just have it instructing, when the mouse moves over the "Reveal" link/feature?!




also........

U/You..............will U/You fix it please?


I'm using the "nobbc" prefix code to stop the auto changes.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 03, 08:42 PM 2011
Hello EVERYONE,

Bayes:

"If it makes such a difference then what's the purpose of betting 'special' patterns which are designed to 'outsmart' random, why not just constantly bet red + hit 'n' run?"

Bayes, I think you just might have "summed" it up.....

ALMOST every method played HIT AN RUN can yield good results......

HIT AND RUN is the angle we are approaching the game.....

Perhaps math might meet it's equal......


Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 03, 09:01 PM 2011
Bayes,

A profound discovery was made by Arthur, red and black are the ONLY even chance bets which are evenly distributed around the roulette wheel.......

H/L and E/O are divided around the wheel in a chaotic matter.....

Either way you look at it this effects the game....

RANDOM will have a different result for red and black versus H/L E/O..........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: donik7777 on Jul 03, 09:48 PM 2011
Bayes the easiest thing to criticize, but you can give a system that I go tomorrow and start earning. I can tell you many thanks.

Johnlegend thank you for your hard work, you promised a new method for on Sundays,
when we can see.
Thanks again for your diligence.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 03, 10:34 PM 2011
Quote from: ZeroBlue on Jul 03, 04:31 PM 2011
"HIT & RUN raises odds expectation."  -False.


No big deal. The systems presented still have merit.



Although i think they are no better than any Random Vs Random Method. - True


All systems betting against or in favor of any given pattern have the same hit ratio, because they are based on odds.


If we play one Single EC in patterns of 3 formations



You get 8 combinations


1. RRR
2. RBR
3. RRB
4. RBB
5. BBB
6. BRB
7. BBR
8. BRR

the odds are 1/8

that is set in stone.

You can try different triggers to achieve a better ratio:

Play after 2 consecutive losses. LL then bet and stop on a win.

Wait for a perfect state of balance between the patterns.

Play after a noticeable Ecart and try to catch a correction.

Correlate parameters and raise expectation.
[/size]
[/size]================================================================
[/size]
[/size]Any system should be tested flat bet as a measure of it's efficiency.
[/size]Only then we can make comparisons.
[/size]
[/size]
[/size]Zer0Blue
[/size]


Thanks ZeroBlue........

As I mentioned to Bayes, play ALMOST any method HIT AND RUN and it will yield go results.......
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jul 03, 10:50 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jul 03, 09:01 PM 2011
Bayes,

A profound discovery was made by Arthur, red and black are the ONLY even chance bets which are evenly distributed around the roulette wheel.......

H/L and E/O are divided around the wheel in a chaotic matter.....

Either way you look at it this effects the game....

RANDOM will have a different result for red and black versus H/L E/O..........


that is not QUITE true.
in a sense there is more to it...


If you look at pairs of EC's you will love that RED ODD & BLACK EVEN have 10 numbers each against RE & BO 8 numbers each.


Also there is a pattern on the wheal for H/L & E/O although it is less apparent.


Zer0Blue
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 04, 08:57 AM 2011
Quote from: warrior on Jul 03, 01:04 PM 2011
John does not get offended that easy trust me.
You are right Warrior, I was just off yesterday a few family issues to deal with. I will post up PHASE 3 tonight. And the Holy One tomorrow night. No offense taken Bayes. I can only report my results as they come.

Its up to the individual whether they want to play it that way or not. I'm not the only one on here who has been successful with the hit and run approach. Gordonline is doing even better than myself.

I admire his composure and self discipline. He is on his way to making it big with this game. Anyway, hissy fit over LoL! JL is back...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 04, 10:14 AM 2011
Quote from: vundarosa on Jul 03, 03:17 PM 2011
"So someone who plays 20 games in a row is much more likely to fail than someone who plays the 20 games only a couple at a time, even though they've both played exactly the same number of spins."

-----------

I have to agree with Bayes here. I don't see any difference from playing continuously or hit & run, in the way its defined here, as short play then walk away.

one is equally likely to find the winning/losing spins by playing hit & run or continously...say you play continously, win 10u then have a loss, playing for 2u will not change the fact that next time you play you can have a loss....in fact it might well be that each time you start you'll enter at the wrong time and have a loss after another, while the guy who just started one spin latter is winning time and time again by playing continously...

vundarosa
Let me address this, with a method like PATTERN 4 I will agree HIT and RUN is less effective in avoiding a single loss. But with methods like PATTERN BREAKER, MATRIX VERTICAL 5 and most certainly CODE 4. Hit and run has shown me a definate advantage.

PATTERN 4 holds merit for me on two counts. The scarceness of double losses, and the quick turnover. But take a method like code 4. Just think about this for a moment. You could play 150 or more CONSECUTIVE GAMES without losing. So imagine how long you could go without a loss playing two by two.

So I'm saying a method that already has a good strikerate straight, can have a great one HIT AND RUN. I will update CODE 4 LATER as I'm sure AMK would like this thread to get back on topic.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: akuuka on Jul 05, 04:41 AM 2011
Here, the excell file for code-4 as manual insert. What do you think? any suggestion?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 05, 03:32 PM 2011
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 AS OF 05/07/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 400
TOTAL GAMES WON 400
TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 800 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 198

STEP 2 WINS 140

STEP 3 WINS 55

STEP 4 WINS 7

I don't know what to say about this Marvel, other than amazing. Now to Smee, Bayes and all the others who say Hit and Run has no value or advantage over straight play. If I had been playing CODE 4 for even 5 games a session instead of 2. I would now own 6 losses.I will make this argument for the rest of my life. You are weaving in and out of potential losses a lot more HIT AND RUN. Instead of waiting for the innevitable. And in doing so you cheat random YES YOU DO. You cheat it, and get a bigger cut of the goodies. With Pattern 4 the paper odds aren't wide enough to gain the big picture. With CODE 4 and PHASE 3 they are.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: akuuka on Jul 06, 01:01 AM 2011
My result using Code-4 with my Code-4 Manual.xlsx on casinosbo.com Live Roulette Table 19




1   29   3   B            
2   32   3   B            
3   9   1   C            
4   26   3   B            
5   0   -   -            
6   26   3   B            
7   32   3   B   1   3   12   L
8   7   1   A   1   B   AC   W
9   24   2   C   2   3   12   W
10   30   3   C   2   B   AC   W
11   10   1   A   3   1   23   L
12   8   1   B   3   C   AB   W
13   10   1   A   4   3   12   W
14   17   2   B   4   B   AC   L
15   18   2   C   5   #VALUE!   #VALUE!   #VALUE!
16   25   3   A   5   -   -   L
17   25   3   A   6   3   12   L
18   2   1   B   6   B   AC   L
19   7   1   A   7   3   12   W
20   20   2   B   7   B   AC   L
21   29   3   B   8   1   23   W
22   2   1   B   8   A   BC   W
23   5   1   B   9   2   13   W
24   32   3   B   9   C   AB   W
25   11   1   B   10   3   12   W
26   5   1   B   10   C   AB   W
27   16   2   A   11   1   23   W
28   24   2   C   11   A   BC   W
29   24   2   C   12   1   23   W
30   6   1   C   12   B   AC   W
31   6   1   C   13   1   23   L
32   17   2   B   13   A   BC   W
33   6   1   C   14   2   13   W
34   1   1   A   14   B   AC   W
35   23   2   B   15   2   13   L
36   0   -   -   15   C   AB   -
37   25   3   A   16   3   12   L
38   24   2   C   16   A   BC   W
39   10   1   A   17   3   12   W
40   36   3   C   17   A   BC   W
41   20   2   B   18   1   23   W
42   10   1   A   18   B   AC   W
43   12   1   C   19   1   23   L
44   30   3   C   19   A   BC   W
45   2   1   B   20   2   13   W
46   9   1   C   20   B   AC   W
47   15   2   C   21   3   12   W
48   19   2   A   21   B   AC   W
49   15   2   C   22   1   23   W
50   4   1   A   22   B   AC   W
51   11   1   B   23   1   23   L
52   25   3   A   23   B   AC   W
53   22   2   A   24   3   12   W
54   24   2   C   24   B   AC   W
55   36   3   C   25   1   23   W
56   6   1   C   25   B   AC   W
57   19   2   A   26   1   23   W
58   35   3   B   26   B   AC   L
59   1   1   A   27   2   13   W
60   30   3   C   27   A   BC   W
61   5   1   B   28   2   13   W
62   15   2   C   28   C   AB   L
63   21   2   C   29   2   13   L
64   1   1   A   29   C   AB   W
65   18   2   C   30   1   23   W
66   8   1   B   30   C   AB   W
67   34   3   A   31   1   23   W
68   0   -   -   31   C   AB   -
69   28   3   A   32   2   13   W
70   29   3   B   32   B   AC   L
71   29   3   B   33   1   23   W
72   30   3   C   33   C   AB   L
73   7   1   A   34   1   23   L
74   19   2   A   34   A   BC   L
75   4   1   A   35   2   13   W
76   3   1   C   35   B   AC   W
77   6   1   C   36   #VALUE!   #VALUE!   #VALUE!
78   16   2   A   36   -   -   L
79   7   1   A   37   3   12   W
80   29   3   B   37   A   BC   W
81   11   1   B   38   2   13   W
82   22   2   A   38   C   AB   W
83   11   1   B   39   1   23   L
84   16   2   A   39   A   BC   L
85   18   2   C   40   3   12   W
86   18   2   C   40   C   AB   L


Thank's !!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:



Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: marivo on Jul 06, 03:44 AM 2011
Quote from: akuuka on Jul 06, 01:01 AM 2011
My result using Code-4 with my Code-4 Manual.xlsx on casinosbo.com Live Roulette Table 19


Can you pls explain what means: SP NM DZ CL PTK BET ON?
Can you add column with results and total resultes?
Thanks.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: akuuka on Jul 06, 09:05 AM 2011
Hi Marrivo


SP = Spin
NM = Number
DZ = Dozen
CL = Coloumn
PTK = Point to Check
BET ON = The Dozen or Coloumn that we should to bet
ST = Status of our Bet. Win/lose
Ex:
SP NM Dz Cl PTK BETON ST
1   29   3   B           
2   32   3   B           
3   9   1   C           
4   26   3   B           
5   0   -   -           
6   26   3   B           
7   32   3   B   1   3   12   L

8   7   1   A   1   B   AC   W
After Spin #6, we should see PTK = 13, ignore PTK, just see on BetON= 12 to put yout bet, so we should bet for spin #7 on Doz 12
if we win, then Status would be "W" and if we lose Status would be "L".
After Spin #7, we should see PTK = 1B, BetOn=AC, so we should bet for spin #8 on Coloumn AC
en so on

That's all. Simply.

Best Regard,
akuuka
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jul 06, 01:59 PM 2011
CODE 4 with reverse switch
=====================
Record lines in matrix 4.

Alternate results:
doz/col/doz/col
col/doz/col/doz

Stop at any winner per line.

I prefer the progression 1-1,2-2,3-3,4-4,5-5.....etc
Up 1 on a loss; down 1 on a win
Reset to 1-1 when level or ahead.

(can use standard code4 progression instead; 1-1,3-3,9-9,27-27)

I would advise for better advantage to play only on NOZERO roulette

2c2c --first line results
b3c2 --L-2, L-4, w+3   -3 (reduce to 2-2)
1b3b --w+2                -1 (reduce to 1-1)
a3a3 --L-2, w+2           -1
1b2a --L-2, w+2           -1
b2c1 --w+1                 +0
3c1b --w+1                 +1
a1c3 --w+1                 +2
2b2c --w+1                 +3
b1a1 --L-2, w+2          +3
2a1a --L-2, w+2          +3
a1a1 --w+1                 +4
2b1b --w+1                 +5
a3a1 --w+1                 +6
3b2c --w+1                 +7
a1a3 --w+1                 +8
3a2b --w+1                 +9
c2b1 --L-2,w+2            +9
2a3c --w+1                 +10

+10u in 76 spins.


Explanation
========
2c2c
b3c2
The first bet is 1u on both COLUMN 1 & 3 (opposite to dozen result 2) The bet lost
The second bet is 2u on both DOZEN 1 & 2  (opposite to column result c) The bet lost
The third bet is 3u on both COLUMN 1 & 3 (opposite to dozen result 2) The bet won STOP

2c2c
b3c2
1b3b
The first bet is 2u on DOZEN 1 & 3 (opposite to column result b) The bet won STOP

2c2c
b3c2
1b3b
a3a3
The first bet is 1u on COLUMN 2 & 3 (opposite to dozen result 1) The bet lost
The second bet is 2u on DOZEN 1 & 3 (opposite to column result b) The bet won STOP

2c2c
b3c2
1b3b
a3a3
1b2a
The first bet is 1u on DOZEN 2 & 3 (opposite to column result a) The bet lost
The second bet is 2u on COLUMN 1 & 2 (opposite to dozen result 3) The bet won STOP

2c2c
b3c2
1b3b
a3a3
1b2a
b2c1
The first bet is 1u on COLUMN 2 & 3 (opposite to dozen result 1) The bet won STOP

etc..etc..

If playing standard code4 progression the result is +18u.
1 won at level 3
5 won at level 2
12 won at level 1
There was no level 4 bet required.

Interesting  - and maybe with HIT AND RUN???

Cheers,
A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: marivo on Jul 06, 03:08 PM 2011
Quote from: akuuka on Jul 06, 09:05 AM 2011
Hi Marrivo


SP = Spin
NM = Number
DZ = Dozen
CL = Coloumn
PTK = Point to Check
BET ON = The Dozen or Coloumn that we should to bet
ST = Status of our Bet. Win/lose
Ex:
SP NM Dz Cl PTK BETON ST
1   29   3   B           
2   32   3   B           
3   9   1   C           
4   26   3   B           
5   0   -   -           
6   26   3   B           
7   32   3   B   1   3   12   L

8   7   1   A   1   B   AC   W
After Spin #6, we should see PTK = 13, ignore PTK, just see on BetON= 12 to put yout bet, so we should bet for spin #7 on Doz 12
if we win, then Status would be "W" and if we lose Status would be "L".
After Spin #7, we should see PTK = 1B, BetOn=AC, so we should bet for spin #8 on Coloumn AC
en so on

That's all. Simply.

Best Regard,
akuuka


Thank you. I still dont understand whats PTK... What do we "check" with it? ???
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: akuuka on Jul 06, 04:10 PM 2011

Marrivo ... don't be confuse about PTK. :)

PTK is just my way on excell formula to make sure that :
a. on spin #7 will according to spin#1 on Dz
b. on spin #8 will according to spin#1 on Col
c. on spin #9 will according to spin#2 on Dz
d. on spin #10 will according to spin#2 on Col
and so on ...


That's all. Just to make easier for me to create excell formula. ;D
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: marivo on Jul 06, 04:49 PM 2011
Quote from: akuuka on Jul 06, 04:10 PM 2011
Marrivo ... don't be confuse about PTK. :)

PTK is just my way on excell formula to make sure that :
a. on spin #7 will according to spin#1 on Dz
b. on spin #8 will according to spin#1 on Col
c. on spin #9 will according to spin#2 on Dz
d. on spin #10 will according to spin#2 on Col
and so on ...


That's all. Just to make easier for me to create excell formula. ;D


I see. Why are you tracking this way? Originally we wait 12 spins and then bet against 1., right?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: akuuka on Jul 06, 06:50 PM 2011
Quote from: marivo on Jul 06, 04:49 PM 2011

I see. Why are you tracking this way? Originally we wait 12 spins and then bet against 1., right?


Based on AMK's explanation on page#1 of this topic, it wait just 6 spins not 12. or am i missing something here?  :) .


Anyway, if just right that we have to wait 12 spins, my question is, why we have to wait 12 spins when we just doing the same thing in 6 spins? right?


IMHO, the point is the result of our bet on roulette, isn't it?


Regards,
akuuka
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: marivo on Jul 06, 07:11 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jun 08, 03:15 PM 2011
                                                               
                                                              CODE 4 DC

Note down the last 12 spins of dozens/columns alternating into 3 groups each 4 wide..

Example:  numbers 1,2,3 are dozens, letters A,B,C are columns

                             2B1C
                             3C2A
                             2C3A
                              .........  fourth pattern



I think this is 1. post (part of it)  ???
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: akuuka on Jul 06, 07:13 PM 2011
Yes Marivo ... That's is. But I see note

2B1C
3C2A
2C3A
.........  fourth pattern


2B is one number = mean number on dozen 2 col B, 1C is One number too, so when we calculate, it's exactly need 6 number. and the 7 number is the "fourth pattern". Isn't it? I make the excell file base on it.

Don't be confused Marivo. Just Relax's. Test it will make you make decision. ;D

[/size]Regards,
[/size]akuuka

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: marivo on Jul 06, 07:33 PM 2011
Originally these are 2 numbers. If you take it as 1 number then it's CODE 4 your way. No problem. Just to be clear.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Jul 06, 10:13 PM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Jul 06, 01:59 PM 2011
CODE 4 with reverse switch
=====================
Record lines in matrix 4.

Alternate results:
doz/col/doz/col
col/doz/col/doz

Stop at any winner per line.

I prefer the progression 1-1,2-2,3-3,4-4,5-5.....etc
Up 1 on a loss; down 1 on a win
Reset to 1-1 when level or ahead.

(can use standard code4 progression instead; 1-1,3-3,9-9,27-27)

I would advise for better advantage to play only on NOZERO roulette

2c2c --first line results
b3c2 --L-2, L-4, w+3   -3 (reduce to 2-2)
1b3b --w+2                -1 (reduce to 1-1)
a3a3 --L-2, w+2           -1
1b2a --L-2, w+2           -1
b2c1 --w+1                 +0
3c1b --w+1                 +1
a1c3 --w+1                 +2
2b2c --w+1                 +3
b1a1 --L-2, w+2          +3
2a1a --L-2, w+2          +3
a1a1 --w+1                 +4
2b1b --w+1                 +5
a3a1 --w+1                 +6
3b2c --w+1                 +7
a1a3 --w+1                 +8
3a2b --w+1                 +9
c2b1 --L-2,w+2            +9
2a3c --w+1                 +10

+10u in 76 spins.


Explanation
========
2c2c
b3c2
The first bet is 1u on both COLUMN 1 & 3 (opposite to dozen result 2) The bet lost
The second bet is 2u on both DOZEN 1 & 2  (opposite to column result c) The bet lost
The third bet is 3u on both COLUMN 1 & 3 (opposite to dozen result 2) The bet won STOP

2c2c
b3c2
1b3b
The first bet is 2u on DOZEN 1 & 3 (opposite to column result b) The bet won STOP

2c2c
b3c2
1b3b
a3a3
The first bet is 1u on COLUMN 2 & 3 (opposite to dozen result 1) The bet lost
The second bet is 2u on DOZEN 1 & 3 (opposite to column result b) The bet won STOP

2c2c
b3c2
1b3b
a3a3
1b2a
The first bet is 1u on DOZEN 2 & 3 (opposite to column result a) The bet lost
The second bet is 2u on COLUMN 1 & 2 (opposite to dozen result 3) The bet won STOP

2c2c
b3c2
1b3b
a3a3
1b2a
b2c1
The first bet is 1u on COLUMN 2 & 3 (opposite to dozen result 1) The bet won STOP

etc..etc..

If playing standard code4 progression the result is +18u.
1 won at level 3
5 won at level 2
12 won at level 1
There was no level 4 bet required.

Interesting  - and maybe with HIT AND RUN???

Cheers,
A.

Hi Atlantis

Very interesting new take   :) . Alternating dz & col. I will try it @ PP Slingshot. Less $$$ consuming prog. Have u played it more?   
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jul 07, 02:32 PM 2011
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Jul 06, 10:13 PM 2011
Very interesting new take   :) . Alternating dz & col. I will try it @ PP Slingshot. Less $$$ consuming prog. Have you played it more?

Hi Robeenhuut,

I played a continuous session of 248 spins with REVERSE CODE 4 which meant I played 61 lines...

41 won on bet 1
12 won on bet 2
7 won on bet 3
1 LOST on bet 4

The one losing line cost me -2, -4, -6 and -8 = total of -20units. That happened on the 38th game (line) from commencement of play. At the time of the 4-loss I was +25units so at that point in the session I was reduced to +5units.

I continued play from the 5-5 level. The bets did eventually rise to 11-11 due to the circumstances that occurred but at the 50th game I had managed to return to +25units at which point I lowered bets to 1-1 and from thence on increased the profit to +30units at the 61st game.

In this session I did not reduce the progression at any stage until I was level or ahead of any previous bankroll high.

However as JL will no doubt tell you.. I do not think continuous play is the safest option at all -- I am only just testing it that way to see how it performs.
If playing standard code4 progression there would have been a full one line loss (80u) incurred.

A.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: shermantor on Jul 07, 04:35 PM 2011
Hi guys.

Just a thought dunno if it would work.  What about betting for the same pattern to appear?  So for example i had, on pp slingshot, first numbers

1B1B numbers 8,5,1,36
xxxx
xxxx
1B1C numbers 12,11,2,12

And william first numbers

1C1A
xxxx
xxxx
2B2A

So instead of betting opposite spending 2 units.  What about betting 1 unit on at least 1 item appearing again?  Progression 1,1,2,3 ?  7 unit loss if lose. +2 or +1 if win.  Or 1,2,4,8.  15 units loss or a +2 win?

Dunno if anyone could check their winnings and see if this is any good or not?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jul 07, 04:39 PM 2011
it has exactly the same odds-

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: shermantor on Jul 07, 05:29 PM 2011
ok cheers for speedy reply zeroblue!! :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Jul 07, 10:21 PM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Jul 07, 02:32 PM 2011
Hi Robeenhuut,

I played a continuous session of 248 spins with REVERSE CODE 4 which meant I played 61 lines...

41 won on bet 1
12 won on bet 2
7 won on bet 3
1 LOST on bet 4

The one losing line cost me -2, -4, -6 and -8 = total of -20units. That happened on the 38th game (line) from commencement of play. At the time of the 4-loss I was +25units so at that point in the session I was reduced to +5units.

I continued play from the 5-5 level. The bets did eventually rise to 11-11 due to the circumstances that occurred but at the 50th game I had managed to return to +25units at which point I lowered bets to 1-1 and from thence on increased the profit to +30units at the 61st game.

In this session I did not reduce the progression at any stage until I was level or ahead of any previous bankroll high.

However as JL will no doubt tell you.. I do not think continuous play is the safest option at all -- I am only just testing it that way to see how it performs.
If playing standard code4 progression there would have been a full one line loss (80u) incurred.

A.

Hi Atlantis

I played 11 games on PP Slingshot and managed to win 6 units. I wouldnt play it continuously. Get on hot streak and get out. But this thing looks pretty stable and u can recover fairly quickly.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jul 08, 08:29 AM 2011
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Jul 07, 10:21 PM 2011
I played 11 games on PP Slingshot and managed to win 6 units. I wouldnt play it continuously. Get on hot streak and get out. But this thing looks pretty stable and You can recover fairly quickly.

Hi Robeenhuut,

Thanks. Yes probably a good idea hit'n'run tactics. Here is something to check out and try!

This is my REVERSE CODE 4 session result played slightly differently.

Here I use a revised 3 step progression per line (no fourth bet made):

1st Step: 1-1
2nd Step: 1-1
3rd Step: 3-3

(total 10u at risk)


2a3a - first line
a2a2  w    +1
2c1c  w    +2
b2a2  w    +1
3b3a  w    +2
a2c3  w    +3
3c2b  w    +4
c1c2  w    +3
3b3a  w    +2
a1b2  w    +3
1b1a  w    +2
b1a3  w    +3
3b3c  w    +4
c2a2  w    +3
1c3a  w    +4
c3a3  w    +5
1b3b  w    +6
c3b2  w    +7
2b1b  w    +8
c2a1  w    +9
2b3a  w    +10
b1b3  w    +9
3a2c  w    +10
c1a3  w    +9
2b1a  w    +10
a1b3  w    +11
2a2a  w    +12
b1c2  w    +11
2c3b  w    +10
a1b3  w    +11
3b1a  w    +12
b1c2  w    +13
2a2a  w    +12
b3c3  w    +11
3a3a  w    +12
b1a2  w    +13
1c2c  w    +14
a3b3  L     +4 *3 step loss
3c2b  w     +5
a3b2  w     +6
3b2a  w     +7
c2c1  w     +6
3a3c  w     +5
a2b2  w     +6
2a1b  w     +7
b2a3  w     +6
2b3c  w     +5
a2b1  w     +6
3c3c  w     +7
1a1c  w     +8
b1c3  w     +9
2c3c  w     +8
b2c3  w     +7
3b3c  w     +8
c2a2  w     +7
2c1c  w     +8
a3c2  w     +9
3b2c  w     +10
a3a1  w     +11   
1a1b  w     +10     
b3a2  w     +11

+11 in 61 games. Highest bet 3-3.

I tried to take advantage of fact that MOST wins are on bet 1.  A win on bet 2 or bet 3 produces a result of -1.
A three step loss results in -10 (happened only once above in game 38)
So hopefully get more +1's than -1's.  Played HIT ' n ' RUN could be good!

:)

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Jul 08, 09:48 AM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Jul 08, 08:29 AM 2011
Hi Robeenhuut,

Thanks. Yes probably a good idea hit'n'run tactics. Here is something to check out and try!

This is my REVERSE CODE 4 session result played slightly differently.

Here I use a revised 3 step progression per line (no fourth bet made):

1st Step: 1-1
2nd Step: 1-1
3rd Step: 3-3

(total 10u at risk)


2a3a - first line
a2a2  w    +1
2c1c  w    +2
b2a2  w    +1
3b3a  w    +2
a2c3  w    +3
3c2b  w    +4
c1c2  w    +3
3b3a  w    +2
a1b2  w    +3
1b1a  w    +2
b1a3  w    +3
3b3c  w    +4
c2a2  w    +3
1c3a  w    +4
c3a3  w    +5
1b3b  w    +6
c3b2  w    +7
2b1b  w    +8
c2a1  w    +9
2b3a  w    +10
b1b3  w    +9
3a2c  w    +10
c1a3  w    +9
2b1a  w    +10
a1b3  w    +11
2a2a  w    +12
b1c2  w    +11
2c3b  w    +10
a1b3  w    +11
3b1a  w    +12
b1c2  w    +13
2a2a  w    +12
b3c3  w    +11
3a3a  w    +12
b1a2  w    +13
1c2c  w    +14
a3b3  L     +4 *3 step loss
3c2b  w     +5
a3b2  w     +6
3b2a  w     +7
c2c1  w     +6
3a3c  w     +5
a2b2  w     +6
2a1b  w     +7
b2a3  w     +6
2b3c  w     +5
a2b1  w     +6
3c3c  w     +7
1a1c  w     +8
b1c3  w     +9
2c3c  w     +8
b2c3  w     +7
3b3c  w     +8
c2a2  w     +7
2c1c  w     +8
a3c2  w     +9
3b2c  w     +10
a3a1  w     +11   
1a1b  w     +10     
b3a2  w     +11

+11 in 61 games. Highest bet 3-3.

I tried to take advantage of fact that MOST wins are on bet 1.  A win on bet 2 or bet 3 produces a result of -1.
A three step loss results in -10 (happened only once above in game 38)
So hopefully get more +1's than -1's.  Played HIT ' n ' RUN could be good!

:)

A.

Yeah Atlantis

U get most of the hits on the first step so in my opinion it would make a perfect sense
2 come up with progression that would maintain sort of status quo in later stages.
U make yr money in 1 step and try not 2 loose it in further steps. i dont like 1,3,9,27.
Yr prog is better even 4 sort of continuous play (10-20 games)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Jul 08, 02:19 PM 2011
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Jul 08, 09:48 AM 2011
U get most of the hits on the first step so in my opinion it would make a perfect sense
2 come up with progression that would maintain sort of status quo in later stages.
U make yr money in 1 step and try not 2 lose it in further steps. I don't like 1,3,9,27.
Yr prog is better even 4 sort of continuous play (10-20 games)

If playing same hit'n'run style as JohnLegend and going for 2 wins per session opposing 1st line with 4th (original) then don't see why "Reverse Code 4" cannot be equally as successful using the existing 1.3.9.27 staking plan...
Or maybe you can play 1 session using original then 1 session with reverse method.
A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: akuuka on Jul 08, 02:34 PM 2011
QuoteOriginally these are 2 numbers. If you take it as 1 number then it's CODE 4 your way. No problem. Just to be clear

Ok then. That mean that i'm mistakes when to figure out the rule of Code 4 System. Sorry. ;D  I will fixit my way of using Code 4. Thank's for your advice.


Regard
akuuka
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: marivo on Jul 08, 02:56 PM 2011
Quote from: shermantor on Jul 07, 04:35 PM 2011
Hi guys.

Just a thought dunno if it would work.  What about betting for the same pattern to appear?  So for example I had, on pp slingshot, first numbers

1B1B numbers 8,5,1,36
xxxx
xxxx
1B1C numbers 12,11,2,12

And william first numbers

1C1A
xxxx
xxxx
2B2A

So instead of betting opposite spending 2 units.  What about betting 1 unit on at least 1 item appearing again?  Progression 1,1,2,3 ?  7 unit loss if lose. +2 or +1 if win.  Or 1,2,4,8.  15 units loss or a +2 win?

Dunno if anyone could check their winnings and see if this is any good or not?


Quote from: ZeroBlue on Jul 07, 04:39 PM 2011
it has exactly the same odds-




Is that true?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 08, 03:06 PM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Jul 08, 02:19 PM 2011
If playing same hit'n'run style as JohnLegend and going for 2 wins per session opposing 1st line with 4th (original) then don't see why "Reverse Code 4" cannot be equally as successful using the existing 1.3.9.27 staking plan...
Or maybe you can play 1 session using original then 1 session with reverse method.
A.
Atlantis is at it again, I love the way you morph a method my friend. Remember MATRIX VERTICAL 5????? Well its big brother says hello on Sunday. Yes you and Twister still have a stake in possibly the greatest of them ALL. Stay tuned...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jul 08, 06:29 PM 2011
Quote from: marivo on Jul 08, 02:56 PM 2011


Is that true?


Yes it is
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 09, 05:33 AM 2011
CODE 4 RESULTS UPDATE FOR 09/07/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 440

TOTAL GAMES WON 440

TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 880 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 221

STEP 2 WINS 152

STEP 3 WINS 59

STEP 4 WINS 8

Taken to the edge only once in the last 40 games. I am just stunned by this method. Its combination of strikerate and relatively fast turnover. Makes it one of the greatest methods ever. I can hear people say but gee JL its an 80 unit buy in. that's only a lot if your strikerate is potentially small under 200 average expectancy. When you have a method that could/can break the magical 1000 barrier for consecutive wins. 80 units doesn't seem like a lot anymore. My advice to newbies is build up your bankrol playing methods with a smaller buy in, if you don't have a lot to play with. But once you have a few 100 units GET ON THIS ONE.

Play it ONLY two games at a time, (I HAVE 6 RECORDED LOSING GAMES, BUT THEY ALL FALL OUTSIDE OF MY SESSIONS) if you want similar results to mine. And you will soon see what all the fuss is about. Okay with methods like PATTERN BREAKER & DIVIDE AND CONQUER. We only have about one tenth of the risk on the line. But we know we will lose around 1 game out of every 11--15 played. A method like CODE 4 simply doesn't comply with stats. It is capable of going off the chart. I have never had a strikerate of even 500 with any method. I have paper tested methods that showed me its possible, but I have never enjoyed a streak like that in real play. And here I am now with CODE 4 and the one that gets released sunday. Both capable of winning so many times. You simply do not know when they will lose. Play on... Next update at the 500 game milestone.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jul 09, 07:32 AM 2011
Funny things happen when the Roulette Community opens itself to pattern event betting.


This stuff Will make this unbeatable.


link:://rouletteforum.cc/roulette-and-gambling-framework/filtering-lw-registry-by-layers/msg61639/#new




@John


Even the 6 Loosing Games you recorded would be a win. Also you would never went to 27/27 betting with my style of playing it. It would look unfuc*** believable Step 3 Wins=8


What will make a huge profit on this is compounding. A simple way is once you get 5 times your Initial buy in (80) you should raise your base unit.




Good Luck for all
Zer0Blue





Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jul 09, 08:04 AM 2011
Quote from: ZeroBlue on Jul 09, 07:32 AM 2011

What will make a huge profit on this is compounding. A simple way is once you get 5 times your Initial buy in (80) you should raise your base unit.



For a fast turn over when one reaches double Bank 160 units or even more safe 200 units one could bet


2 - 6 - 18 - 54


Although there are countless ways of doing this, with this strike rate it feels very safe.


Just to illustrate this. with John Legend results, in a very agressive manner


initial bank 80
unit size=level 1
1-3-9-27
Win 80 Games


New Bank 160
unit size=level 2
2-6-18-54
Win 40 Games ==== total Games Won - 120


New Bank 240
unit size=level 3
3-9-27-81
Win 30 Games ==== total Games Won - 150


New Bank 330
unit size=level 4
4-12-36-108
Win 20 Games ==== total Games Won - 170


New Bank 410
…
…



Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 09, 10:39 AM 2011
Quote from: ZeroBlue on Jul 09, 08:04 AM 2011

For a fast turn over when one reaches double Bank 160 units or even more safe 200 units one could bet


2 - 6 - 18 - 54


Although there are countless ways of doing this, with this strike rate it feels very safe.


Just to illustrate this. with John Legend results, in a very agressive manner


initial bank 80
unit size=level 1
1-3-9-27
Win 80 Games


New Bank 160
unit size=level 2
2-6-18-54
Win 40 Games ==== total Games Won - 120


New Bank 240
unit size=level 3
3-9-27-81
Win 30 Games ==== total Games Won - 150


New Bank 330
unit size=level 4
4-12-36-108
Win 20 Games ==== total Games Won - 170


New Bank 410
…
…
Hi Zeroblue, I currently use a 160 unit progression, to win 2 units per game. With a method like CODE 4 its all about the longhaul. Playing 2 games at a time. I simply cannot tell you the potential SR. It could still have a 100% strikerate by thanks giving Xmas even.

From the moment AMK forged this gem I knew it was a winner with my playing style. The only question now is over the coming years what will it show me. A four figured strikerate? Five figures? No one knows. The only thing thats certain is this  method defeats roulette comfortably.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jul 09, 09:12 PM 2011
the expected losses playing hit & run would be 4 in each sample of 250 games played.

:(




Had anyone seen 2 complete losses in a row?
;D
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Treasury on Jul 10, 04:44 AM 2011
Does JL and everyone play the column / dozen method on the first page after 12 spins??

Also JL was saying that he usually plays 2 games in a row so after the 4th game, do you bet on the following or wait 4 games again???

e.g. below

2A3B
1C1A
3B2C
........ PLAY THIS LINE SO BET 1 & 3. THEN B & C. THEN 1 & 2. THEN A & C..

I know you should stop after a win so if it landed in column 1 we wouldn't bet the next 3 games

AND THEN DO YOU BET ON OPPOSITE TO THE 2ND LINE????
e.g. 2 & 3, THEN A & B, THEN 2 & 3, THEN B & C???


Can someone explain if this is the way to correctly play CODE 4 as JL does??
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Nickmsi on Jul 10, 07:06 AM 2011
 Does JL and everyone play the column / dozen method on the first page after 12 sp))ins??

Also JL was saying that he usually plays 2 games in a row so after the 4th game, do you bet on the following or wait 4 games again???

e.g. below

2A3B
1C1A
3B2C
........ PLAY THIS LINE SO BET 1 & 3. THEN B & C. THEN 1 & 2. THEN A & C..
(Yes, this is correct)
I know you should stop after a win so if it landed in column 1 we wouldn't bet the next 3 games(Yes, you stop after a win)

AND THEN DO YOU BET ON OPPOSITE TO THE 2ND LINE?(link:://rouletteforum.cc/file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/Carole/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/msoclip1/01/clip_image001.gif)
e.g. 2 & 3, THEN A & B, THEN 2 & 3, THEN B & C???
(No, you continue virtual spinning using this 4th line as the line you next bet against)

2A3B
1C1A
3B2C
3B2B  You win on the first bet of 3rd Dozen, continue virtual spinning
1A2B
2C3B
…….. You now bet against the 3rd dozen of the 4th line, if that loses then bet against the B column etc.Game Complete.

Can someone explain if this is the way to correctly play CODE 4 as JL does??

Hope this helps . . . Nick
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: patola on Jul 10, 09:50 AM 2011
Hi...new here... this is my first post... I think this system is great and would like to try it out.  I'm from Philippines and I would like to try it online first.

JL where do you play? What Online Casino would you recommend? I hope it is available to Philippines... Thanks.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Jul 10, 01:06 PM 2011
From Philippines? Tough luck buddy.  :question:
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: donik7777 on Jul 12, 07:27 AM 2011
Something we forgot about the code 4. I have good results so far.
I miss the 1 and 2 and hit play 3 and 4th.

STEP 3 WINS 59

STEP 4 WINS 8

I can play 50 or $ 100 because I do progression a 1 time (1 / 1, 3 / 3).
Many thanks to AMK and Johnlegend. :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Jul 12, 08:28 AM 2011
Quote from: donik7777 on Jul 12, 07:27 AM 2011
Something we forgot about the code 4. I have good results so far.
I miss the 1 and 2 and hit play 3 and 4th.

STEP 3 WINS 59

STEP 4 WINS 8

I can play 50 or $ 100 because I do progression a 1 time (1 / 1, 3 / 3).
Many thanks to AMK and Johnlegend. :)

-----------------------

this might be a great great great idea!
your only risking 16u and provided double losses be infrequent, should be ahead for the most part...

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jul 13, 12:03 PM 2011
Played this on BV NZ and lost all 80 units i had.

This was my game.

Bet 1,2 and it hit 3
Bet A,B and it hit C.
Bet 1,2 and it hit 3.
Bet A,C and it hit B.

I dont know how you do it JL. Almost 500 games and no losses, yet ive tried 3 times and hit losses 3 times twice being Tv roulette.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 13, 12:30 PM 2011
Juiced91,

In this case play after you see a loss, this is your trigger, then place your bet...........

ZeroBlue has won 1000 straight games...

You need the patience but it will payoff..........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jul 13, 03:36 PM 2011
one has to play a million spins before seeing 5 times in a row a double loss.  ;)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 13, 03:39 PM 2011
Hallelujah
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 13, 03:58 PM 2011
Quote from: ZeroBlue on Jul 13, 03:36 PM 2011
one has to play a million spins before seeing 5 times in a row a double loss.  ;)

Zeroblue, with this you mean 5 times in a row the first pattern matched the 4?

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZeroBlue on Jul 13, 06:18 PM 2011

@AMK

as I explained before amk Code 4 as the odds of 1 loss for each 80 wins
if you play after a loss
like:


1a3c
1a3c LLLL


you may get (rarely) another loss following


then next trigger


2c3b
2c3b LLLL


will you get another loss next?


what about 4 or five times this?
;)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 13, 06:29 PM 2011
:)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Jul 13, 10:22 PM 2011
Hi...new here... this is my first post... I think this system is great and would like to try it out.  I'm from Philippines and I would like to try it online first.

JL where do you play? What Online Casino would you recommend? I hope it is available to Philippines... Thanks.

Hello Patola

Get VPN (for example Overplay) and account in Europe.  you won't get accepted in most of casinos if you live in Phils.  I live in Phils so I know.

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Jul 14, 04:19 AM 2011
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Jul 13, 10:22 PM 2011
Hi...new here... this is my first post... I think this system is great and would like to try it out.  I'm from Philippines and I would like to try it online first.

JL where do you play? What Online Casino would you recommend? I hope it is available to Philippines... Thanks.

Hello Patola

Get VPN (for example Overplay) and account in Europe.  you won't get accepted in most of casinos if you live in Phils.  I live in Phils so I know.

Regards

----------------------

have you guys tried Unibet?!

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Jul 14, 05:55 AM 2011
Quote from: vundarosa on Jul 14, 04:19 AM 2011

----------------------

have you guys tried Unibet?!

vundarosa

Hello Vundarosa

Im ok. I have VPN software that shows that im in Europe and european id and banking account.  I just needed software 2 show that my ip is from europe and not from philippines where i live now  :)

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: donik7777 on Jul 19, 11:53 AM 2011
Code 4 helps me a lot to win thanks to AMK and Johnlegend!
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 19, 12:35 PM 2011
Your welcome donik7777,

We'd love to see your stats from time to time.......
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: donik7777 on Jul 19, 01:09 PM 2011
I'm waiting until the loss of 1 and 2 lines, and play a flat rate for 3 and 4.
I win 7 - 8 units per day and not be afraid to lose 80 units.
Thanks for the stats Johnlegend.
If Johnlegend would have given the details D&C we will not wait so long as kod4.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 19, 02:00 PM 2011
Hello donik7777,

Could you explain your playing style visually, example.....

1A2C
1B2A
2B2A
1A.. ..  place bets.....???

I hope that I explained CODE 4 good enough for you........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: donik7777 on Jul 19, 02:12 PM 2011
Yes, you right, but need wait long time (i play rapid roulette 2 spins per minute)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: donik7777 on Jul 21, 11:02 AM 2011
Hey guys!
I'm playing $ 50 in code 4 put on the line 3 and 4 (a flat rate of 1 / 1 and 1 / 1) and still win $ 200-400 per day (4-8 units). You can count that gave Johnlegend, everywhere is the difference between 3 and 4 line 6-8 times. I play rapid roulette.
    CODE 4 RESULTS UPDATE FOR 09/07/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 440

TOTAL GAMES WON 440

TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 880 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 221

STEP 2 WINS 152

STEP 3 WINS 59

STEP 4 WINS 8
   You can see other results Johnlegend on this topic.   Thanks Johnlegend.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 21, 11:51 AM 2011
Hello donik7777,

You have great results. I know that English is difficult for you but could you explain visually how you are playing. Perhaps show a complete session for us.

For example:

1B2A    1st pattern
2B2A
3A3A
1B...           1B qualifies because it matches 1B from first pattern. Now FLAT BET against 2A?????

Hope you can guide us visually donik7777 :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: donik7777 on Jul 21, 11:59 AM 2011
YES AMK,
maybe if we use this method D&C don't need wait like code 4 (but need results)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Juiced91 on Jul 22, 03:31 AM 2011

What's up hits I had an idea. We could play code 4 but you play with high and low and odd and even. Recorded exactly the same way as the dozens except its only 15 units instead of 80. I did 1000 spins with 100 wins and 1 loss. What do you all think?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 22, 07:40 AM 2011
CODE 4 RESULTS UPDATE 22/07/11

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 560

TOTAL GAMES WON 560

TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 1120 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 273

STEP 2 WINS 186

STEP 3 WINS 89

STEP 4 WINS 12

This is the first time I have ever won 500 times plus with any method. I have 7 losses recorded in my records but have never met one in real play. That to me proves the merit of the HIT AND RUN APPLICATION. Don't be there when it happens. So AMK what can I say. Possibly THE MATRIX SLIDE if played with a 4 step progression could win 500/1. Time will tell as I have yet to even see a tripple loss in my sessions. But for the time being CODE 4 stands as the closest thing I have yet seen to the Holy One. Its simply brilliant. Next update at 600 games played. I don't know if I can reach 4 figures. The seventh losing line I recorded was my closest call yet.

IT CAME ON THE THIRD GAME, AFTER MY TWO GAME SESSION HAD FINISHED. I am telling you straight HIT AND RUN is superior to continuos play WITHOUT QUESTION...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 22, 07:46 AM 2011
AMAZING JohnLegend........

Your results truly show the merit of HIT AND RUN........

CODE 4 would never have been had it not been for PATTERN 4.....

Your approach to the game is masterful....


Juiced91, CODE 4 for EC's is already explained on the first page of the thread......

Please keep us informed because it looks solid......

:)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 22, 08:58 AM 2011
Quote from: Juiced91 on Jul 22, 03:31 AM 2011
What's up hits I had an idea. We could play code 4 but you play with high and low and odd and even. Recorded exactly the same way as the dozens except its only 15 units instead of 80. I did 1000 spins with 100 wins and 1 loss. What do you all think?
That's a great idea Juiced especially for newbies who have less funds. At the end of the day any playing style that shows positive numbers has to be considered.

I decided to take on AMKS original full on because I'm able to, and just looking back at a hundred spin sample from the outset. I couldnt find a single loss. Then the only tweak I made was to play two continuos games like this.

2C3A-CODE 1 FOR GAME 1
1B1B-CODE 2 FOR GAME 2
2C3A--VIRTUAL LINE
3C1A--WIN GAME 1 STEP 1
1A1B--WIN GAME 2 STEP 2

SESSION OVER.

Notice how the virtual line matches CODE 1 this happens every now and then. And playing this way has rewarded me with an incredible 560 wins no losses to date...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Kingspin on Jul 22, 06:13 PM 2011
I have been playing code 4 recently , I started out with £3.60p left in  an online account, so far I am up to £100 playing with 25p chips.  The hit rate on the first spin seems better than I would expect. I will be playing 50p chips soon to accelerate the bankroll.  :)

code 4 is better than PB4 if you ask me. On real wheel only , on rng you will loose for sure.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 22, 06:36 PM 2011
Quote from: Kingspin on Jul 22, 06:13 PM 2011
I have been playing code 4 recently , I started out with £3.60p left in  an online account, so far I am up to £100 playing with 25p chips.  The hit rate on the first spin seems better than I would expect. I will be playing 50p chips soon to accelerate the bankroll.  :)

code 4 is better than PB4 if you ask me. On real wheel only , on rng you will lose for sure.
Kingspin CODE 4 is better than everything....

Well I think the MATRIX SLIDE could be as good but it wont be as fast.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Kingspin on Jul 22, 08:18 PM 2011
I agree john, code 4 is very  good , i will keep playing and let you guys know how high i can get the bankroll up to before a bankroll "crash" appears :)  Hope fully it won't.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: madden011 on Jul 23, 01:16 AM 2011
what progression is recommended for code 4?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: GLC on Jul 23, 01:39 AM 2011
Quote from: madden011 on Jul 23, 01:16 AM 2011
what progression is recommended for code 4?


Madden011,


I was just checking in one last time before hitting the hay and saw your question.  Unfortunately, most of the members are East of here and are all snoozing right now.


The progression is 1-1; 3-3; 9-9;   Play this progression until you lose.  If and when this happens, then start playing 3-3; 9-9; 27-27.  Since you lost the first level 26 units.  with the 2nd progression, you win 3 units on every hit, so JohnLegend recommends playing the 2nd level 5 wins to recover 15 of the 26 units.  Then you drop back to the 1st level and recover the other 11 units 1 unit at a time.


If you look back to reply #64 of the topic, you can read it straight form the horses mouth, as we say here in Tucson.


LOL and good night!


GLC
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: topcat888 on Jul 23, 01:40 AM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jul 22, 08:58 AM 2011
That's a great idea Juiced especially for newbies who have less funds. At the end of the day any playing style that shows positive numbers has to be considered.

I decided to take on AMKS original full on because I'm able to, and just looking back at a hundred spin sample from the outset. I couldnt find a single loss. Then the only tweak I made was to play two continuos games like this.

2C3A-CODE 1 FOR GAME 1
1B1B-CODE 2 FOR GAME 2
2C3A--VIRTUAL LINE
3C1A--WIN GAME 1 STEP 1
1A1B--WIN GAME 2 STEP 2

SESSION OVER.

Notice how the virtual line matches CODE 1 this happens every now and then. And playing this way has rewarded me with an incredible 560 wins no losses to date...

Hi John

I would like to understand your tweek better, can you show some 'real life' examples..?

Thanks

P.S. I have just played my second real game and lost 27/27 can you please check the numbers for me ~ am I just unlucky..?!?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: madden011 on Jul 23, 02:35 AM 2011
thanks GLC  :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 23, 06:22 AM 2011
Quote from: Kingspin on Jul 22, 08:18 PM 2011
I agree john, code 4 is very  good , I will keep playing and let you guys know how high I can get the bankroll up to before a bankroll "crash" appears :)  Hope fully it won't.
It will eventually lose Kingspin, the question is how many progressions will you win, before you lose one. Ive won 7 already.

Thats the name of the game afterall, winning more than you lose...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 23, 06:34 AM 2011
Quote from: topcat888 on Jul 23, 01:40 AM 2011
Hi John

I would like to understand your tweek better, can you show some 'real life' examples..?

Thanks

P.S. I have just played my second real game and lost 27/27 can you please check the numbers for me ~ am I just unlucky..?!?
You play for TWO consecutive games only then shut it down.

1C2B-CODE 1
3C2A-CODE 2
2B1C--VIRTUAL LINE
3C2A-WIN GAME 1 STEP 1
3C1B-WIN GAME 2 STEP 3

Thats my playing frame for a session, it never changes...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Jul 23, 09:40 AM 2011
Quote from: topcat888 on Jul 23, 01:40 AM 2011
Hi John

I would like to understand your tweek better, can you show some 'real life' examples..?

Thanks

P.S. I have just played my second real game and lost 27/27 can you please check the numbers for me ~ am I just unlucky..?!?

----------------

@topcat, not sure how you're playing but your numbers should give you a won game....

playing the way JL plays, I'm at 120 consecutive games with no loss....I did find a loss when I was playing for 15-20units a section after going about 200 games no loss...After the loss i decided to play just for 2 games a section and saw many more losses within the 15-20 units like i was playing before...so i am now convinced that playing Hit&Run for 2 wins will yield the best results long term.

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: chrisbis on Jul 23, 09:45 AM 2011
Quote from: vundarosa on Jul 23, 09:40 AM 2011
.............so I am now convinced that playing Hit&Run for 2 wins will yield the best results long term.

vundarosa


How long do you wait in between each Hit & Run session Vundarosa?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Jul 23, 09:53 AM 2011
Quote from: chrisbis on Jul 23, 09:45 AM 2011

How long do you wait in between each Hit & Run session Vundarosa?

------------------

lol, i just do not play continuosly...like most methods out there which have triggers to start betting...

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: topcat888 on Jul 23, 01:09 PM 2011
Hi vundarosa, thanks for the reply... but I was using the 'built in' Code 4 in MST (as you can see by the screen shot) so why would that be wrong..??

Also sorry to be difficult but I still don't see what this means:

1C2B-CODE 1
3C2A-CODE 2
2B1C--VIRTUAL LINE
3C2A-WIN GAME 1 STEP 1
3C1B-WIN GAME 2 STEP 3

Can you explain for me...?

Thanks
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: artattack on Jul 23, 02:18 PM 2011
Hi Top Cat.

MST is not set up to play this way at the moment, but you can still use it for tracking.

1C2B-CODE 1   (this is the 1st set of 4 numbers)

3C2A-CODE 2    (this is the 2nd set of 4 numbers)

2B1C--VIRTUAL LINE  (this is the 3rd set of 4 numbers, we note them down, but do not use them at     all, they are virtual)

Now we start to bet.
3C2A-WIN GAME 1 STEP 1   (game 1 here is a bet against CODE 1   1C2B  NOT repeating as above. We won on the 1st step, dozen 3 popped up)
we won on step 1 so we now wait for the rest of the line to complete C2A completes the line

Now we start to bet again for game number 2

3C1B-WIN GAME 2 STEP 3   (game 2 here is a bet against CODE  2 3C2A   NOT repeating as above. We won on the 3rd step dozen 1 popped up
We won on step 3 so thats it, will fill up our plastic carrier bags with cash and leave.

No need to note down the B because we won and have gone home.

I hope this helps.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: topcat888 on Jul 23, 04:01 PM 2011
artattack, thanks for taking the time to explain... I understand now where it's going.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 23, 08:05 PM 2011
GLC...........


Quote from: Johnlegend on Jun 11, 11:17 AM 2011
I think for those using the full four steps two levels should suffice

1,3,9,27X 2 LEVEL 1

2,6,18,54X 2 LEVEL 2=TOTAL RISK 240 UNITS

If you lose a game at level 1 you play the nest 20 games at level 2 to recover half your loss then drop down to level 1.

If playing only the first 3 steps you could use two levels like this.

1,3,9X 2 LEVEL 1

3,9,27X 2 LEVEL 2=104 UNITS RISK

If you lose at level 1 you play 5 games at level 2 to recover over half your loss then drop back down to level 1.

Also if I am able to string together winning streaks over 20 for the first game of the day for PATTERN 4 with odds of 7/1. Imagine the potential for CODE 4 with odds of 80/1. You could win the first game of the day for the whole year. Even first game of each session. We should stake to exploit this. ;D ;D
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: topcat888 on Jul 24, 05:21 AM 2011
What happens if a zero appears within the first three sets of four lines (code1, code2 and virtual)..?? Is that a reset..??
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Jul 24, 05:33 AM 2011
Quote from: topcat888 on Jul 24, 05:21 AM 2011
What happens if a zero appears within the first three sets of four lines (code1, code2 and virtual)..?? Is that a reset..??

---------

i personally do not play any line where zero is involved...i track the same but if i have to play it as my code 4, or the 5th line i just skip them and play the next line

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ThomasGrant on Jul 24, 12:49 PM 2011
Hi Code 4 members.
Would like your opinion on how the script works.
The script was written by Silver. He is an excellent script writer.

link:://rouletteforum.cc/tom's-place/code-4-for-rss-pro/ (link:://rouletteforum.cc/tom's-place/code-4-for-rss-pro/)

Take a look at the latest video.
And see how it bets.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: slatan on Jul 26, 09:52 AM 2011
Hi Johnlegend,
In post #19 by Gordonline there are 3700 spins Code 4 format (live wheel spins)
It’s 925 rows of code4. I am a little bit confused because if you check any raw for repeaters you can find up to 20 times the same raw. Ok.. Maybe an average would be like 10-12 rows â€" repeaters.
That means we are not going to be winners. What make you think that if you play 5 times per day it can reduce chances not to catch part of those loses? Maybe someone who fan of code 4 can reply if Johnlegend is busy
Thanks for your help
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 26, 01:10 PM 2011
Hello Slatan,

I went through Gordonlines spin data sometime ago and if I remember correctly only found 12 loses....

Either way, JohnLegends results speak for themselves ........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Kingspin on Jul 26, 02:48 PM 2011
I played this a lot a week or two back , I gave up because I run out of patience , I like betting every spin ,expect to go to last leg of progression roughly about in 20 games ,  that's what I found. 0 can kill it so be warned! :)

Code 4 Rating 8 out of 10.
Title: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 26, 03:31 PM 2011
Hello Kingspin,

PATIENCE is the name of the game..... :)

JohnLegend once faced a double zero........

Even if you like to play on every spin just keep track of CODE 4 at the same time...........

Only play HIT AND RUN for two back to back games a session....... 5 session per day.......
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Kingspin on Jul 26, 03:57 PM 2011
 amk , I did play hit and run ,  I think it's a solid bet , I got nice winning runs , I got the nerves rattled a few times when I hit that dredded last leg of progression a few times , like I said the 0 is the main enemy. The hits on first and second spin seem to come often , more often than I expected.
A pretty good system, still looking for the grail though  :(
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 26, 04:04 PM 2011
Hello Kingspin,

We might have to come to the conclusion that there is no GRAIL in the definition that people are looking for......

However, if your definition of the GRAIL is a method which will ONLY show you longterm profits this forum has more than enough............

I guess one more can't hurt :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: topcat888 on Jul 27, 02:24 AM 2011
Out of interest what are most people using, the three step or the four step progression..?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: wolfat on Jul 27, 04:46 AM 2011
CODE 4 RESULTS UPDATE 22/07/11

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 560

TOTAL GAMES WON 560

TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 1120 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 273

STEP 2 WINS 186

STEP 3 WINS 89

STEP 4 WINS 12

Mani tx to JL and other contributors.
I'd like to point out a thing: checking your stats I realized that, from the beginning, your strike rate on step 1 is around 50%; this is not so good for a 2 doz betting that should get ar. 66% on avg, ; BUUUT this is VEERY good for a single dozen betting that's hitting 50% instead regular 33% giving a huge advantage of 17% betting for a repeating pattern, at least on step 1 only.
Is there a flaw in my thinking?
comments are welcome
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Wally Gator on Jul 27, 06:44 AM 2011
Combine that with XXVV's prog on D+C reversal bet and you've got a home run.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 27, 11:14 AM 2011
Quote from: slatan on Jul 26, 09:52 AM 2011
Hi Johnlegend,
In post #19 by Gordonline there are 3700 spins Code 4 format (live wheel spins)
It’s 925 rows of code4. I am a little bit confused because if you check any raw for repeaters you can find up to 20 times the same raw. Ok.. Maybe an average would be like 10-12 rows â€" repeaters.
That means we are not going to be winners. What make you think that if you play 5 times per day it can reduce chances not to catch part of those loses? Maybe someone who fan of code 4 can reply if Johnlegend is busy
Thanks for your help
What makes me think is my results Slatan, think for a moment. If you have paper odds of 80/1 and you play 100 consecutive games would you expect to lose?

Now you play just two  games five times a day randomly. Who is more likely to catch a loss? don't get me wrong I've got seven losses recorded in my records. I just wasn't there when they happenned.

That is all the proof I need that hit and run is a superior application. If Id even been playing three games a session instead of TWO. I would have lost by now.

Playing two by two has given me fantastic results. You are missing potential losses playing that way, you really are.

I have been experimenting with a six step code for all three even chances for a total of 63 units risk. Now I am up to 93 CONSECUTIVE GAMES NO LOSS.

Imagine what will be possible playing two by two.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: marivo on Jul 27, 11:31 AM 2011
Quote from: Wally Gator on Jul 27, 06:44 AM 2011
Combine that with XXVV's prog on D+C reversal bet and you've got a home run.


What exactly do you mean? Can you link it? Thanks
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: topcat888 on Jul 27, 12:49 PM 2011
wolfat, can I ask what progression you are using..?

Quote from: wolfat on Jul 27, 04:46 AM 2011
CODE 4 RESULTS UPDATE 22/07/11

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 560

TOTAL GAMES WON 560

TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 1120 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 273

STEP 2 WINS 186

STEP 3 WINS 89

STEP 4 WINS 12

Mani tx to JL and other contributors.
I'd like to point out a thing: checking your stats I realized that, from the beginning, your strike rate on step 1 is around 50%; this is not so good for a 2 doz betting that should get ar. 66% on avg, ; BUUUT this is VEERY good for a single dozen betting that's hitting 50% instead regular 33% giving a huge advantage of 17% betting for a repeating pattern, at least on step 1 only.
Is there a flaw in my thinking?
comments are welcome

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Jul 27, 12:50 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jul 27, 11:14 AM 2011
What makes me think is my results Slatan, think for a moment. If you have paper odds of 80/1 and you play 100 consecutive games would you expect to lose?

Now you play just two  games five times a day randomly. Who is more likely to catch a loss? don't get me wrong I've got seven losses recorded in my records. I just wasn't there when they happenned.

That is all the proof I need that hit and run is a superior application. If Id even been playing three games a session instead of TWO. I would have lost by now.

Playing two by two has given me fantastic results. You are missing potential losses playing that way, you really are.

I have been experimenting with a six step code for all three even chances for a total of 63 units risk. Now I am up to 93 CONSECUTIVE GAMES NO LOSS.

Imagine what will be possible playing two by two.

--------------------------
Hi JL,
I was looking sometime ago at betting the 3 ECs in a code 6 format. I was trying to do it flat bet and betting the line above it...I did not get good results.Now looking at my tests and betting the 4th line against the 1st in a code 6 format, its quite impressive how many win on the first step....maybe a different progression, with a lower risk, would still yeld good results

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 27, 01:46 PM 2011
Quote from: vundarosa on Jul 27, 12:50 PM 2011

--------------------------
Hi JL,
I was looking sometime ago at betting the 3 ECs in a code 6 format. I was trying to do it flat bet and betting the line above it...I did not get good results.Now looking at my tests and betting the 4th line against the 1st in a code 6 format, its quite impressive how many win on the first step....maybe a different progression, with a lower risk, would still yeld good results

vundarosa
No flat betting wont do it Vundarosa, I too have been testing the line above. But putting 63 units on the line. And in 105 consecutive games now.

Ive been taken to the sixth step twice. But the progression has survived. Its done better than code 4 over a similar 100 line sample with 17 units in hand.

I will play for a 500 line sample then draw my conclusions. I suspect already though played in my normal manner it will prove a world beater...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Jul 27, 02:06 PM 2011
"I too have been testing the line above."

---------------

Does it do better than 4th line betting against the 1st?!

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 27, 03:31 PM 2011
Quote from: vundarosa on Jul 27, 02:06 PM 2011
"I too have been testing the line above."

---------------

Does it do better than 4th line betting against the 1st?!

vundarosa
Yes Vundarosa, thats what has suprised me, I can find 3 matches four lines apart after 120 lines but not a single match line under line.

And you can almost see a change coming, through my experience with MATRIX VERTICAL 5. The even chances 6 wide seldom go beyond 6 deep. ALL CHANGE...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 27, 04:13 PM 2011
I know I am going against my principles and ONLY live wheel findings are in my eyes real......

However, 500 lines tested on random.org, 8 loses.......

Longest winning streak 150......

HIT AND RUN should be very interesting............
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 27, 06:42 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jul 27, 04:13 PM 2011
I know I am going against my principles and ONLY live wheel findings are in my eyes real......

However, 500 lines tested on random.org, 8 loses.......

Longest winning streak 150......

HIT AND RUN should be very interesting............
Amk give me an example of a line as you got Random.org to play it. I have now played 145 lines no loss. Yes hit and run will do very nicely. Here is an example of how im playing.

HORLER
HERLOB-WIN STEP 2 as it was EVEN..
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Wally Gator on Jul 27, 07:51 PM 2011
Quote from: marivo on Jul 27, 11:31 AM 2011

What exactly do you mean? Can you link it? Thanks


@marivo:
Start here:  link:://rouletteforum.cc/general-discussion/whitticker-progression-for-dozens-and-columns/msg61876/#msg61876 (link:://rouletteforum.cc/general-discussion/whitticker-progression-for-dozens-and-columns/msg61876/#msg61876)

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: marivo on Jul 28, 04:08 AM 2011
Quote from: Wally Gator on Jul 27, 07:51 PM 2011

@marivo:
Start here:  link:://rouletteforum.cc/general-discussion/Whittacker-progression-for-dozens-and-columns/msg61876/#msg61876 (link:://rouletteforum.cc/general-discussion/Whittacker-progression-for-dozens-and-columns/msg61876/#msg61876)



This is link to the list of topics.....anyway I understand you wanted to direct me to Whittacker Progression for Dozens and Columns (link:://rouletteforum.cc/general-discussion/whitticker-progression-for-dozens-and-columns/msg62650/#msg62650). Is there a specific reply in this thread where I would find the rules for it or you meant I should read it all and try to understand it? And if so I assume you do understand it?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: wolfat on Jul 28, 04:43 AM 2011
Quote from: topcat888 on Jul 27, 12:49 PM 2011
wolfat, can I ask what progression you are using..?
No prog is neede 'cos you have a 50% hitting rate on dozen, anyway I love challenge prog applied to doz/col. I put 13 unit at risk to get 4-5  hitting 4 times everywhere in the session.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: marivo on Jul 28, 06:03 AM 2011
Quote from: wolfat on Jul 27, 04:46 AM 2011

Is there a flaw in my thinking?



Not really.....except that the sample (number of games) is too small...agree?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Jul 28, 08:53 AM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jul 27, 04:13 PM 2011
I know I am going against my principles and ONLY live wheel findings are in my eyes real......

However, 500 lines tested on random.org, 8 loses.......

Longest winning streak 150......

HIT AND RUN should be very interesting............

-----------------

Tested 200 lines so far; found already 6 losses....


vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 28, 04:34 PM 2011
Well, as I say JohnLegend random.org is not LIVE WHEEL results.........

At random.org the lines tested looked like this......

211212
221212

Keep in mind that there was no zero.....

Either way HIT AND RUN will look nice............
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 28, 04:45 PM 2011
This method just got me thinking about CODE 4...............

Still have to test.........

Idea is play CODE 4 with a column repeat trigger, the more the better........

1C2A     
2C3B

  C
  C is our trigger.....

Now bet against 1C2A........

If you have two columns that repeat even better.......

1C3B
2C2B

  C  B
  C  B  is our trigger......

Now bet against 1C3B.........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 28, 04:49 PM 2011
:)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: GLC on Jul 28, 04:52 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jul 28, 04:45 PM 2011
This method just got me thinking about CODE 4...............

Still have to test.........

Idea is play CODE 4 with a column repeat trigger, the more the better........

1C2A     
2C3B

  C
  C is our trigger.....

Now bet against 1C2A........

If you have two columns that repeat even better.......

1C3B
2C2B

  C  B
  C  B  is our trigger......

Now bet against 1C3B.........

Good thought AMK.  Might as well include the dozens as well.  Any repeat of dozens or columns should be the same odds.  More betting opportunity.

G
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Jul 28, 04:53 PM 2011
oooooooo yes......
Title: Re: CODE 4 Some zeros creeping in
Post by: bombay67 on Jul 29, 10:00 AM 2011
Hi AMK, JohnLegend and everybody else,

Many thanks to you all for providing us with the ideas and help that you do.

I have been using D&C for a bit and have now moved onto Code4.

This question has been asked before but I'm still not clear on the answer to this, so let me give you some real numbers that I was faced with: -

24,3,6,2       = 2 C 1 B   this is Code 1 to oppose in game 1

4,29,14,15   = 1 B 2 C   this is Code 2 to oppose in game 2

8,14,11,0     = 1 B 1 0   this should be virtual line - is this still the same, can I ignore it?

21,7,32,21   = 2 A 3 C   this should be a win on 2nd bet for col A ( against C )

3,35,17,1     = 1 B 2 A   this should be a win on 4th bet for col A (against B - scary moment though)

14,31,0,11   = 2 A 0 A   what should I do with this line, dump it and just use the next three?

30,35,13,32 = 3 B 2 B  is this the Code 1 to oppose in the next game 1

35,18,24,9   = 3 C 2 C  is this the Code 2 to oppose in the next game 2

18,20,4,21   = 2 B 1 C  this is the virtual line

I know that you and JohnLegend have advised to cut and run at just two games and it seems a great plan but JohnLegend also says he logs lines after he has finished betting and I know there are a few who have tested this in continuous play.

Many thanks for your advice and please keep up the great work you are an inspiration.

Regards

Bombay67
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 29, 11:39 AM 2011
Quote from: amk on Jul 28, 04:34 PM 2011
Well, as I say JohnLegend random.org is not LIVE WHEEL results.........

At random.org the lines tested looked like this......

211212
221212

Keep in mind that there was no zero.....

Either way HIT AND RUN will look nice............
This is what I feel about any manmade random simulator. IT BEHAVES TOO LOGICALLY. By that I mean  its designed to give you average outcomes. As you tell me random.org showed you eight losses over 500 lines I am 260/1 from real spins.

What a manmade simulator does is take your progression and more or less deliver a breakeven scenario over a given number of spins. TRUE RANDOM SIMPLY doesn't BEHAVE THIS WAY.

Yes there will be times when 7 wins will be followed by a loss for say PATTERN BREAKER. But there will also be times when you don't see a loss for 4 x the paper odds. Especially in HIT AND RUN PLAY.

And this will only be magnified by even bigger paper odds. Hence the reason I have now broken 600 winning games and STILL NO LOSS for CODE 4.

With paper odds of 80/1 I should have lost 6 times at least by now. And were I playing even FIVE GAME SESSIONS. I would own SEVEN LOSSES.

There is no greater indicator to me that TWO BY TWO PLAY. Has given me a huge advantage.

Now a method with paper odds of 63/1 went nearly 250 lines before it lost. And the MATRIX SLIDE doesn't look like it will ever surrender an 80 unit progression.

But it takes time to chew, it cannot be rushed. INVINCIBILITY COMES AT A PRICE FEW ARE WILLING OR ABLE TO PAY.

I can wait for something that will deliver an awesome strikerate. CAN YOU?

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Jul 31, 03:51 AM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jul 29, 11:39 AM 2011
This is what I feel about any manmade random simulator. IT BEHAVES TOO LOGICALLY. By that I mean  its designed to give you average outcomes. As you tell me random.org showed you eight losses over 500 lines I am 260/1 from real spins.

What a manmade simulator does is take your progression and more or less deliver a breakeven scenario over a given number of spins. TRUE RANDOM SIMPLY doesn't BEHAVE THIS WAY.

Yes there will be times when 7 wins will be followed by a loss for say PATTERN BREAKER. But there will also be times when you don't see a loss for 4 x the paper odds. Especially in HIT AND RUN PLAY.

And this will only be magnified by even bigger paper odds. Hence the reason I have now broken 600 winning games and STILL NO LOSS for CODE 4.

With paper odds of 80/1 I should have lost 6 times at least by now. And were I playing even FIVE GAME SESSIONS. I would own SEVEN LOSSES.

There is no greater indicator to me that TWO BY TWO PLAY. Has given me a huge advantage.

Now a method with paper odds of 63/1 went nearly 250 lines before it lost. And the MATRIX SLIDE doesn't look like it will ever surrender an 80 unit progression.

But it takes time to chew, it cannot be rushed. INVINCIBILITY COMES AT A PRICE FEW ARE WILLING OR ABLE TO PAY.

I can wait for something that will deliver an awesome strikerate. CAN YOU?

Hello John

I lost a first game ever played but i only went 3 steps.  But i would have lost if i had gone all d way.  I guess bad karma  ;D
Since then 200+ wins so Patience guys.

Regards

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 31, 07:56 AM 2011
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Jul 31, 03:51 AM 2011
Hello John

I lost a first game ever played but I only went 3 steps.  But I would have lost if I had gone all d way.  I guess bad karma  ;D
Since then 200+ wins so Patience guys.

Regards
Yes thats the word look at any method longterm. If you dont you will miss out and waste many years, never getting anywhere. You were very unfortunate to enter the cycle at the wrong time on that first game.
Title: Re: CODE 4 Some zeros creeping in
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 31, 08:03 AM 2011
Quote from: bombay67 on Jul 29, 10:00 AM 2011
Hi AMK, JohnLegend and everybody else,

Many thanks to you all for providing us with the ideas and help that you do.

I have been using D&C for a bit and have now moved onto Code4.

This question has been asked before but I'm still not clear on the answer to this, so let me give you some real numbers that I was faced with: -

24,3,6,2       = 2 C 1 B   this is Code 1 to oppose in game 1

4,29,14,15   = 1 B 2 C   this is Code 2 to oppose in game 2

8,14,11,0     = 1 B 1 0   this should be virtual line - is this still the same, can I ignore it?

21,7,32,21   = 2 A 3 C   this should be a win on 2nd bet for col A ( against C )

3,35,17,1     = 1 B 2 A   this should be a win on 4th bet for col A (against B - scary moment though)

14,31,0,11   = 2 A 0 A   what should I do with this line, dump it and just use the next three?

30,35,13,32 = 3 B 2 B  is this the Code 1 to oppose in the next game 1

35,18,24,9   = 3 C 2 C  is this the Code 2 to oppose in the next game 2

18,20,4,21   = 2 B 1 C  this is the virtual line

I know that you and JohnLegend have advised to cut and run at just two games and it seems a great plan but JohnLegend also says he logs lines after he has finished betting and I know there are a few who have tested this in continuous play.

Many thanks for your advice and please keep up the great work you are an inspiration.

Regards

Bombay67
Hello Bombay67, a zero in the virtual line should be ignored. If however its in one of the two code lines I advise you START OVER.

Do not break up the first two code lines. I believe they give the way I play a certain advantage. BTW welcome to the ultimate ROULETTE FORUM...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 31, 08:19 AM 2011
CODE 4 RESULTS UPDATE FOR 31/07/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 650

TOTAL GAMES WON 649

TOTAL GAMES LOST 1

STRIKERATE 649/1

BALANCE 1140 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 330

STEP 2 WINS 195

STEP 3 WINS 110

STEP 4 WINS 14--LOSSES 1

Well it had to lose at some point, and it took a zero in the line to do it. But still 649/1 is some strikerate. I will see if I can still make it 1000/1
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: topcat888 on Jul 31, 12:53 PM 2011
Amazing John, amazing..!  :o
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Kingspin on Jul 31, 02:10 PM 2011
Amazing but no one playing it  ???
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: trebor on Jul 31, 02:30 PM 2011
Great results JL and I see you have lost at last so maybe you are human after all.   :)

Robert
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jul 31, 06:37 PM 2011
Quote from: trebor on Jul 31, 02:30 PM 2011
Great results JL and I see you have lost at last so maybe you are human after all.   :)

Robert
Last time I checked I was Trebor, LoL. I only survived that long because of my two by two play. Nothing longer would have worked. Unfortunately theres one method sitting on this forum that isnt going to get its due from other members.

But I suspect already it cannot lose in the HIT AND RUN application. In fact I don't think it will lose however you play it. I'm talking about THE MATRIX SLIDE.

I will stay with it to find out, its what we must do. I believe its identified another of randoms Achilles heels. It may have in fact broken randoms leg altogether. I will endeavour to find out.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: xupamagaita on Jul 31, 09:50 PM 2011
We all know that there is the possibilitie of loss. But there will be thousands of exit points in good profit.
Face this as a long run system, compound your winnings and exit whenever you want.

I made more than 1300 wins without a loss so far.

Explore your limits first betting with cents
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: topcat888 on Aug 02, 01:13 PM 2011
Quote from: xupamagaita on Jul 31, 09:50 PM 2011

I made more than 1300 wins without a loss so far.


I think that is staggering results..!  :o
Title: Re: CODE 4 VERTICAL + SLIDE
Post by: atlantis on Aug 03, 06:35 AM 2011
VERTICAL CODE 4 + SLIDE
=====================
Record alternate lines of CODE 4 results
doz,col,doz,col
col,doz,col,doz etc.........

For example:

2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c 

After the first THREE lines are recorded then look at the last three vertical results in each column
and if there are 3 parts of a pattern formed then bet AGAINST the formation of a symmetrical QUAD forming...

For instance if you have:

2
b
2
Bet here against column b occurring and forming the vertical QUAD pattern 2b2b

For instance if you have:
c
1
c
Bet here against dozen 1 occurring and forming the vertical QUAD pattern c1c1

CHECK LAST 3 VERTICAL COLUMN RESULTS AFTER EACH LINE TO DETERMINE IF TO BET
Betting progression same as for CODE 4 or MATRIX SLIDE

There are generally bet opportunities on each line after the initial 12 results; although sometimes
there are lines when no bet is indicated.

[reveal]
2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c 
b 2 a 2 - Wcol1
3 b 3 a - Wcol2; Wcol3; Wcol4
a 2 c 3 - no bets
3 c 2 b - Wcol2
c 1 c 2 - Wcol1
3 b 3 a - Wcol3
a 1 b 2 - Wcol1
1 b 1 a - Lcol2; Lcol4
b 1 a 3 - Lcol2; Wcol4
3 b 3 c - Lcol2
c 2 a 2 - Wcol2
1 c 3 a - Lcol3
c 3 a 3 - Lcol3
1 b 3 b - Lcol3
c 3 b 2 - Lcol1; Wcol3
2 b 1 b - Wcol1; Lcol2; 
c 2 a 1 - Wcol2; Wcol4
2 b 3 a - Lcol1
b 1 b 3 - Wcol1; Wcol2
3 a 2 c - no bets
c 1 a 3 - no bets
2 b 1 a - Wcol2; Wcol4
a 1 b 3 - no bets
2 a 2 a - Wcol2; Lcol4
b 1 c 2 - Wcol1; Wcol4
2 c 3 b - Wcol2
a 1 b 3 - Wcol1
3 b 1 a  - Wcol2
b 1 c 2  - no bets
2 a 2 a  - Wcol2
b 3 c 3  - Wcol4
3 a 3 a  - Wcol1; Wcol3
b 1 a 2  - Wcol2; Wcol4
1 c 2 c  - Wcol1
a 3 b 3  - no bets
3 c 2 b  - no bets
a 3 b 2  - Lcol2; Lcol3
3 b 2 a  - Lcol1; Wcol2; Lcol3
c 2 c 1  - Wcol1; Wcol3
3 a 3 c  - no bets
a 2 b 2 - Wcol1
2 a 1 b - Lcol2
b 2 a 3 - Lcol2
2 b 3 c - Wcol2
a 2 b 1 - Wcol1
3 c 3 c - Wcol2
b 1 c 3 - Wcol3; Wcol4
2 c 3 c - no bets
b 2 c 3 - Wcol2; Lcol3; Lcol4
3 b 3 c - Wcol1; Lcol3; Lcol4
c 2 a 2 - Wcol3
2 c 1 c - Wcol2
a 3 c 2 - Lcol4
3 b 2 c - Lcol4
a 3 a 1 - Wcol4   
1 a 1 b - Wcol1; Wcol2     
b 3 a 2 - no bets
[/reveal]

Might be good HIT'N'RUN  - - and for extra safety play after losing TRIGGER!?

Also (with separate progression) you can combine diagonal tracking for MATRIX slide as well. :)
Because of the way the matrix is generated you can apply the SLIDE rules to both dozens and
columns AND/OR you could bet with SLIDE against symmetrical QUAD pattern formation
too...This will provide more bets too as there are more symmetrical QUAD patterns for a single 2/1
chance results.

For instance:
2
   2
      3
         X - Here bet against dozen 3 forming sym QUAD "2233"

b
   b
      b
         X - Here bet against column b forming sym QUAD "bbbb"

3
   1
      3
         X - Here bet against dozen 3 forming QUAD pattern "3131"


Example:
2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c  - first 12 results
b 2 a 2 - Wcol1 (against c forming aacc); Wcol4 (against 1 forming 2211)


Good Luck :)
Atlantis.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 03, 08:34 AM 2011
Here are same results but playing this time only SLIDE against symmetrical vertical QUADS...
(diagonal method)

[reveal]
2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c 
b 2 a 2 - Wcol1; Wcol4 (the bets will always be col1 or col4 or both)
3 b 3 a - W; W
a 2 c 3 - L
3 c 2 b - L; W
c 1 c 2 - W; W
3 b 3 a - L
a 1 b 2 - W; W
1 b 1 a - W
b 1 a 3 - W; L
3 b 3 c - W; W
c 2 a 2 - W; W
1 c 3 a - W; L
c 3 a 3 - W; W
1 b 3 b - W; W
c 3 b 2 - W; W
2 b 1 b - W; W 
c 2 a 1 - W; W
2 b 3 a - W
b 1 b 3 - W; L
3 a 2 c - L; L
c 1 a 3 - W; W
2 b 1 a - W
a 1 b 3 - L
2 a 2 a - W; W
b 1 c 2 - L; W
2 c 3 b - W
a 1 b 3 - L
3 b 1 a - W
b 1 c 2 - L; L
2 a 2 a  - W
b 3 c 3  - W
3 a 3 a  - L
b 1 a 2  - W; L
1 c 2 c  - L; W
a 3 b 3  - W
3 c 2 b  - L; W
a 3 b 2  - W
3 b 2 a  - W
c 2 c 1  - W; W
3 a 3 c  - W
a 2 b 2 -  W; L
2 a 1 b -  no bet
b 2 a 3 -  no bet
2 b 3 c - W; W
a 2 b 1 - L; W
3 c 3 c - W; W
b 1 c 3 - L; L
2 c 3 c - W; W
b 2 c 3 - W; W
3 b 3 c - W; W
c 2 a 2 - W; W
2 c 1 c - L; W
a 3 c 2 - L
3 b 2 c - L
a 3 a 1 - W   
1 a 1 b - W; L     
b 3 a 2 - W; W
[/reveal]

Longest losing run=3 :)

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: bombay67 on Aug 03, 10:08 AM 2011
Hi Atlantis, I like the idea of what you are doing here.

You are maximizing the betting opportunities which is a great thing. 

I can just hear what JohnLegend would be saying about it not being hit and run with your rolling 3 lines.  :o

You are not showing any zeros so were you lucky enough not to see any or do you remove the line with a zero in it?

Also I know it sounds like a stupid question and the answer is the same for all matrix style bets but what do you do if you miss log a spin through say a distraction, just virtual spin that line and use the next?

Good luck with your testing and are these live numbers?

Regards

Bombay67
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 03, 10:46 AM 2011
Same results this time using SLIDE to bet against PERFECT DIAGONAL QUADS ONLY in a CODE 4 Matrix...
eg: betting against diagonal 222 becoming 2222; or diagonal bbb becoming bbbb

[reveal]
2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c - first 12 results 
b 2 a 2
3 b 3 a
a 2 c 3
3 c 2 b
c 1 c 2
3 b 3 a 
a 1 b 2
1 b 1 a 
b 1 a 3 
3 b 3 c 
c 2 a 2
1 c 3 a
c 3 a 3
1 b 3 b
c 3 b 2 
2 b 1 b - W col1
c 2 a 1 - W col1
2 b 3 a
b 1 b 3 
3 a 2 c
c 1 a 3
2 b 1 a 
a 1 b 3 
2 a 2 a 
b 1 c 2 
2 c 3 b 
a 1 b 3 
3 b 1 a
b 1 c 2 - L col1
2 a 2 a
b 3 c 3
3 a 3 a
b 1 a 2
1 c 2 c
a 3 b 3
3 c 2 b 
a 3 b 2
3 b 2 a
c 2 c 1  - W col1
3 a 3 c  - W col1
a 2 b 2
2 a 1 b
b 2 a 3
2 b 3 c - W col4
a 2 b 1
3 c 3 c - W col4
b 1 c 3
2 c 3 c
b 2 c 3 - W col1
3 b 3 c
c 2 a 2
2 c 1 c
a 3 c 2
3 b 2 c - L col4
a 3 a 1 
1 a 1 b     
b 3 a 2

+5

[/reveal]

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: xupamagaita on Aug 03, 11:54 AM 2011
it works the same against any pattern.
:o
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Aug 03, 03:22 PM 2011
JohnLegend..........your just getting started............. :)


Hello, atlantis........

Amazing, this past week I was looking into similar CODE 4 methods..............
I think your approach:

2A2B
B2B3
1C2A
A3C2..... bet against 2 landing

has the greatest potential............
Ever line changes order from doz/co/doz/col to col/doz/col/doz
This approach really throws random off...........
It's even difficult just typing it in :)
It might in fact create the possibility of ALWAYS just betting against 2222 forming diagonally?......
Being able to cover the zero would take CODE 4 to another level......


xupamajaita 1300 wins..... did you play real 1 cent RNG?............
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 03, 03:40 PM 2011
Quote from: bombay67 on Aug 03, 10:08 AM 2011
You are maximizing the betting opportunities which is a great thing. 

You are not showing any zeros so were you lucky enough not to see any or do you remove the line with a zero in it?

Also I know it sounds like a silly question and the answer is the same for all matrix style bets but what do you do if you miss log a spin through say a distraction, just virtual spin that line and use the next?

Good luck with your testing and are these live numbers?

Hi Bombay67, amk and xupamagaita,

So far I am really liking the potential of the SLIDE technique and betting against diagonal symmetrical QUADS forming in the CODE 4 matrix. Yes it does maximize the bet opportunities. The numbers were spun at BV NoZero roulette, but as regards the 0 and incorrect recording then I would play with caution and restart with a new 3 line set of 12 numbers in that case...
There's no rush with this revision due to frequency of bets. But always try and stop when a few units in front of course. Obviously it's going to work better on nozero - but maybe you can have small side bet cover on the 0 as insurance?

Quote
2A2B
B2B3
1C2A
A3C2..... bet against 2 landing

Sure you can do that exactly, amk - but see the extra win gained by betting against diagonal symmetrical quad BBCC in column 1 of line 4??
You could stop that session there and then with a +2 profit if needs be.

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Aug 03, 03:47 PM 2011
I think it's beautiful atlantis............

Play 60 spins and continually flow with the next betting opportunity, diagonally, horizontally, vertically.....


Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 03, 03:56 PM 2011
Hi amk,

LOL! Well I think I would prefer to stick to just sliding diagonally and/or vertically betting against the symmetrical quads forming - perhaps with separate bank for each... JL thinks the slide is particularly strong - so maybe just use diagonal SLIDE? I find this would be a comfortable way to play; max of 2 bets per line after the initial 12 recorded spins with the occasional no-bet lines.

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Aug 03, 04:02 PM 2011
Well......... maybe not 60........

But a few more spins wouldn't hurt :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 03, 04:06 PM 2011
For sure, amk! In my example I think I used around 240 spins with continuous flow betting!
A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Aug 03, 04:09 PM 2011
I was literally just about to say.........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Aug 03, 04:17 PM 2011
Diamond pattern might also be nice.........

2B1C
B3B2
1B3C


Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ophis on Aug 03, 06:05 PM 2011
Quote from: xupamagaita on Aug 03, 11:54 AM 2011
it works the same against any pattern.
:o

that's correct.

Quote from: amk on Aug 03, 03:22 PM 2011
JohnLegend..........your just getting started............. :)


Hello, atlantis........

Amazing, this past week I was looking into similar CODE 4 methods..............
I think your approach:

2A2B
B2B3
1C2A
A3C2..... bet against 2 landing

has the greatest potential............
Ever line changes order from doz/co/doz/col to col/doz/col/doz
This approach really throws random off...........
It's even difficult just typing it in :)
It might in fact create the possibility of ALWAYS just betting against 2222 forming diagonally?......
Being able to cover the zero would take CODE 4 to another level......


xupamajaita 1300 wins..... did you play real 1 cent RNG?............

So basicly this is as you would use matrix 5wide....


Quote from: amk on Aug 03, 04:17 PM 2011
Diamond pattern might also be nice.........

2B1C
B3B2
1B3C




I got something better.

Play against forming CODE text.

C
2B1B
B3A2
1B3B

O
2B1C
B3B2
1B3C

D
2B1C
A3B2
1B3C

E
2B1B
A3B2
1B3B


:yawn: /facepalm
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Aug 03, 06:55 PM 2011
Hello Ophis,

That was just your 444 post......... :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Chrisbis on Aug 04, 02:32 AM 2011
Don't you mean his :-

4
  4
    4


post?
:P
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 05, 06:59 AM 2011
Safer play using SLIDE against "symmetrical" diagonal QUADS forming using CODE 4 style MATRIX.
This time betting with standard progression 1-1,3-3,9-9,27-27 as usual - but only after 2 L's in succession recorded... More patience required but *could* be worth it! :)

[reveal]
2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c 
b 2 a 2 - Wcol1; Wcol4 (the bets will always be col1 or col4 or both)
2 b 1 b - W; W 
c 2 a 1 - W; W
2 b 3 a - W
b 1 b 3 - W; L
3 a 2 c - L; L                     -2     (1st step 1-1 lost)
c 1 a 3 - W; W                  +1     (2nd step 3-3 won)
2 b 1 a - W
a 1 b 3 - L               
2 a 2 a - W; W   
b 1 c 2 - L; W
2 c 3 b - W         
a 1 b 3 - L
3 b 1 a - W
b 1 c 2 - L; L
2 a 2 a  - W                      +2   (1st step 1-1 won)
b 3 c 3  - W
3 a 3 a  - L
b 1 a 2  - W; L
1 c 2 c  - L; W                   +3   (1st step 1-1 won)
a 3 b 3  - W
3 c 2 b  - L; W
a 3 b 2  - W
3 b 2 a  - W
c 2 c 1  - W; W
3 a 3 c  - W
a 2 b 2 -  W; L
2 a 1 b -  no bet
b 2 a 3 -  no bet
2 b 3 c - W; W
a 2 b 1 - L; W
3 c 3 c - W; W
b 1 c 3 - L; L
2 c 3 c - W; W                   +4 (1st step 1-1 won)
b 2 c 3 - W; W
3 b 3 c - W; W
c 2 a 2 - W; W
2 c 1 c - L; W
a 3 c 2 - L
3 b 2 c - L
a 3 a 1 - W                        +5 (1st step 1-1 won)
1 a 1 b - W; L     
b 3 a 2 - W; W
[/reveal]

Yippee.

Anyone else wanna try?  ::)

A.
(NB. results from BV NoZero)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 05, 11:43 AM 2011
Today tried the last posted session from Normy2000 in albalaha's spins section (image from SmartLive low limit auto roulette) from 02 Aug 2011.

Again playing SLIDE on "symmetrical" QUADS in a code 4 style matrix after 2 consecutive L's
only. [progression 1-1,3-3,9-9,27-27]

Here are the results of first 144 out of the 145 spins. The longest losing run was amazingly only 2; but for safety's sake and maybe overdue caution I will stick to playing only after 2 back to back recorded L's. Nice results. :)

[reveal]
2b3b
a2c2
3c1c
b1b2 L;W
1b1a W
a1b3 W;L
3b2b W;L
b1c3 W
1a2c
c2b1
1a2a W;L
b1a2 W
3b3c W;L
a2a2 W
3b2a L;L
a2b1 W       (WON AT 1ST STEP 1-1)     +1
3a1b W;W
c1a1 W
2c3a W;L
a1c1 L
1c3c W;L    (WON AT FIRST STEP 1-1)  +2
c3b3 W
3c2c W
c3b1 W;W
3c3c W;W
c2a2 W;W
3c3b W
a2a1 L;W
2c1c W;W
b3a3
2a3a W;W
b3b2 W;L
2a1a W;L
a3b1 W
1b3a L
c2c2 W;L
2b1c
a1a2 L
3c2b W       (WON AT FIRST STEP 1-1)     +3
c1b1 W;L
3c3c W
a1c3 W;W
3b3c L;L
c1c3 W;W   (WON AT FIRST STEP 1-1)      +4
2c2c W
b2c2 W

+4u profit.

[/reveal]

As stated before; PATIENCE REQUIRED AND IS THE KEY. Very encouraging indeed!

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Kingspin on Aug 05, 05:36 PM 2011
Atlantis 144 spins means virtually nothing .  I honestly think no matter how many spins any system is played over the result is a loss after x amount of spins.  X could be 4 spins or 400 or 4000 . This is just my own opinion .

On a positive note , code 4 is a good bet though.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 05, 08:57 PM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Aug 05, 11:43 AM 2011
Today tried the last posted session from Normy2000 in albalaha's spins section (image from SmartLive low limit auto roulette) from 02 Aug 2011.

Again playing SLIDE on "symmetrical" QUADS in a code 4 style matrix after 2 consecutive L's
only. [progression 1-1,3-3,9-9,27-27]

Here are the results of first 144 out of the 145 spins. The longest losing run was amazingly only 2; but for safety's sake and maybe overdue caution I will stick to playing only after 2 back to back recorded L's. Nice results. :)

[reveal]
2b3b
a2c2
3c1c
b1b2 L;W
1b1a W
a1b3 W;L
3b2b W;L
b1c3 W
1a2c
c2b1
1a2a W;L
b1a2 W
3b3c W;L
a2a2 W
3b2a L;L
a2b1 W       (WON AT 1ST STEP 1-1)     +1
3a1b W;W
c1a1 W
2c3a W;L
a1c1 L
1c3c W;L    (WON AT FIRST STEP 1-1)  +2
c3b3 W
3c2c W
c3b1 W;W
3c3c W;W
c2a2 W;W
3c3b W
a2a1 L;W
2c1c W;W
b3a3
2a3a W;W
b3b2 W;L
2a1a W;L
a3b1 W
1b3a L
c2c2 W;L
2b1c
a1a2 L
3c2b W       (WON AT FIRST STEP 1-1)     +3
c1b1 W;L
3c3c W
a1c3 W;W
3b3c L;L
c1c3 W;W   (WON AT FIRST STEP 1-1)      +4
2c2c W
b2c2 W

+4u profit.

[/reveal]

As stated before; PATIENCE REQUIRED AND IS THE KEY. Very encouraging indeed!

A.
Wow Atlantis is pushing the envelope again. Keep us posted with this incarnations progress Atlantis. I am sure you Katilla and Warior are spawned from the same rock of morphing genius. You see what others don't. Amk too could be added to this to make a fantastic 4. Imagine you all get together and formulate THEE CODE.

What I tend to do Atlantis is latch onto the first Idea I am impressed with and test the hell outve it. But I am aware there are superb tweaks and morphing going on all the time. I will forever be grateful to you and Twister (Paul) who I miss, for helping me realize the Matrix Verticals potential. Now we are pushing to even higher levels.

I am still fascinated by Katillas Pyramid idea. And I am not too proud to say I never full grasped it. But I would like to investigate it further. So Katilla. Bring it onboard if you read this...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 06, 05:46 AM 2011
Quote from: amk on Aug 03, 03:22 PM 2011
JohnLegend..........your just getting started............. :)


Hello, atlantis........

Amazing, this past week I was looking into similar CODE 4 methods..............
I think your approach:

2A2B
B2B3
1C2A
A3C2..... bet against 2 landing

has the greatest potential............
Ever line changes order from doz/co/doz/col to col/doz/col/doz
This approach really throws random off...........
It's even difficult just typing it in :)
It might in fact create the possibility of ALWAYS just betting against 2222 forming diagonally?......
Being able to cover the zero would take CODE 4 to another level......


xupamajaita 1300 wins..... did you play real 1 cent RNG?............
AMK I like this. I wasnt too sure about betting against a back to back diagonal code repeating. But THIS looks very promising. I will start testing this as I play the normal slide for the columns.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 06, 07:00 AM 2011
Hi John, amk

Yes it works that way splendidly. Here are my earlier results Using SLIDE to bet against PERFECT DIAGONAL QUADS ONLY in a CODE 4 style Matrix...
e.g.: betting against diagonal 222 becoming 2222; or diagonal bbb becoming bbbb
Continuous.

[reveal]
2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c - first 12 results 
b 2 a 2
3 b 3 a
a 2 c 3
3 c 2 b
c 1 c 2
3 b 3 a 
a 1 b 2
1 b 1 a 
b 1 a 3 
3 b 3 c 
c 2 a 2
1 c 3 a
c 3 a 3
1 b 3 b
c 3 b 2 
2 b 1 b - W col1
c 2 a 1 - W col1
2 b 3 a
b 1 b 3 
3 a 2 c
c 1 a 3
2 b 1 a 
a 1 b 3 
2 a 2 a 
b 1 c 2 
2 c 3 b 
a 1 b 3 
3 b 1 a
b 1 c 2 - L col1
2 a 2 a
b 3 c 3
3 a 3 a
b 1 a 2
1 c 2 c
a 3 b 3
3 c 2 b 
a 3 b 2
3 b 2 a
c 2 c 1  - W col1
3 a 3 c  - W col1
a 2 b 2
2 a 1 b
b 2 a 3
2 b 3 c - W col4
a 2 b 1
3 c 3 c - W col4
b 1 c 3
2 c 3 c
b 2 c 3 - W col1
3 b 3 c
c 2 a 2
2 c 1 c
a 3 c 2
3 b 2 c - L col4
a 3 a 1 
1 a 1 b     
b 3 a 2

+5

[/reveal]
A.

Update: Just did another session on BV (with ZERO this time) playing same way:
232 spins
+9u profit
LW record: LWWWWWWWLLWLW
Six Step 1 wins
Two Step 2 wins
One Step 3 win
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 06, 07:27 AM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Aug 06, 07:00 AM 2011
Hi John, amk

Yes it works that way splendidly. Here are my earlier results Using SLIDE to bet against PERFECT DIAGONAL QUADS ONLY in a CODE 4 style Matrix...
e.g.: betting against diagonal 222 becoming 2222; or diagonal bbb becoming bbbb
Continuous.

[reveal]
2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c - first 12 results 
b 2 a 2
3 b 3 a
a 2 c 3
3 c 2 b
c 1 c 2
3 b 3 a 
a 1 b 2
1 b 1 a 
b 1 a 3 
3 b 3 c 
c 2 a 2
1 c 3 a
c 3 a 3
1 b 3 b
c 3 b 2 
2 b 1 b - W col1
c 2 a 1 - W col1
2 b 3 a
b 1 b 3 
3 a 2 c
c 1 a 3
2 b 1 a 
a 1 b 3 
2 a 2 a 
b 1 c 2 
2 c 3 b 
a 1 b 3 
3 b 1 a
b 1 c 2 - L col1
2 a 2 a
b 3 c 3
3 a 3 a
b 1 a 2
1 c 2 c
a 3 b 3
3 c 2 b 
a 3 b 2
3 b 2 a
c 2 c 1  - W col1
3 a 3 c  - W col1
a 2 b 2
2 a 1 b
b 2 a 3
2 b 3 c - W col4
a 2 b 1
3 c 3 c - W col4
b 1 c 3
2 c 3 c
b 2 c 3 - W col1
3 b 3 c
c 2 a 2
2 c 1 c
a 3 c 2
3 b 2 c - L col4
a 3 a 1 
1 a 1 b     
b 3 a 2

+5

[/reveal]
A.

Update: Just did another session on BV (with ZERO this time) playing same way:
232 spins
+9u profit
LW record: LWWWWWWWLLWLW
Six Step 1 wins
Two Step 2 wins
One Step 3 win
Yes Atlantis, the turnover appears more fluid than just columns alone. And there are more step 1 wins. Someones given THE MATRIX SLIDE a SUPER TWEAK.

I think a new thread will be required for the CODE SLIDER. Atlantis, Amk. Keep me posted as to how solid this is. I can see it going a long way played HIT AND RUN. Maybe even better than CODE 4s 642.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 06, 07:35 AM 2011
Hi JohnL,

Yes played HIT'N'RUN could be good. For extra safety could play after a virtual L... but would take longer of course and might not even be required. It would be good to find alternative progression other than the standard 1-1,3-3,9-9,27-27 - but hey, if it works then no problem :)

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 06, 07:51 AM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Aug 06, 07:35 AM 2011
Hi JohnL,

Yes played HIT'N'RUN could be good. For extra safety could play after a virtual L... but would take longer of course and might not even be required. It would be good to find alternative progression other than the standard 1-1,3-3,9-9,27-27 - but hey, if it works then no problem :)

A.
I know you are not keen on that 80 unit risk Atlantis. With quite a few wins on STEP 1 I wonder how a two step progression would pan out. With 6 units. So we aim for the win on STEP 1--BREAK EVEN on STEP 2 And take the loss if it goes to STEP 3. I think HIT AND RUN its worth testing. It all comes down to what percentage a 100 games gives us on the first step. If we are getting around a 60% strikerate. Or even more importantly no more than 10% of games going to step 3. There will be serious potential here to put a smaller progression on the line.

And of course if that yields positive results it will be more appealing.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 06, 12:30 PM 2011
Hi JL,
Another idea to possibly quickly recoup a losing diagonal QUAD might be to continue betting against that result occurring on a reverse diagonal.

c 2 a 2
2 c 1 c
a 3 c 2
3 b 2 c - L 1-1@ col4 (c-c-c-c) Now bet against c forming a reverse diagonal...
a 3 a 1 - W 3-3 @col3 (c-c-c-c-a) 
1 a 1 b     
b 3 a 2

Cheers,
A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 06, 05:35 PM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Aug 06, 12:30 PM 2011
Hi JL,
Another idea to possibly quickly recoup a losing diagonal QUAD might be to continue betting against that result occurring on a reverse diagonal.

c 2 a 2
2 c 1 c
a 3 c 2
3 b 2 c - L 1-1@ col4 (c-c-c-c) Now bet against c forming a reverse diagonal...
a 3 a 1 - W 3-3 @col3 (c-c-c-c-a) 
1 a 1 b     
b 3 a 2

Cheers,
A.
Atlantis you are stepping it up again. BRILLIANT! Ive never seen a reverse. Maybe a grail like method in itself.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 07, 10:29 AM 2011
Example of using reverse SLIDE after losing diagonal QUADS in a code 4 style MATRIX.
Original earlier result produced +5
With fast recoup using reverse slide = +9

[reveal]
2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c - first 12 results 
b 2 a 2
3 b 3 a
a 2 c 3
3 c 2 b
c 1 c 2
3 b 3 a 
a 1 b 2
1 b 1 a 
b 1 a 3 
3 b 3 c 
c 2 a 2
1 c 3 a
c 3 a 3
1 b 3 b
c 3 b 2 
2 b 1 b - W col1 (3-3-3-2)
c 2 a 1 - W col1 (b-b-b-c)
2 b 3 a
b 1 b 3 
3 a 2 c
c 1 a 3
2 b 1 a 
a 1 b 3 
2 a 2 a 
b 1 c 2 
2 c 3 b 
a 1 b 3 
3 b 1 a
b 1 c 2 - L col1 (b-b-b-b)
2 a 2 a  - W col2 (using reverse slide b-b-b-b-a)
b 3 c 3
3 a 3 a
b 1 a 2
1 c 2 c
a 3 b 3
3 c 2 b 
a 3 b 2
3 b 2 a
c 2 c 1  - W col1 (b-b-b-c)
3 a 3 c  - W col1 (2-2-2-3)
a 2 b 2
2 a 1 b
b 2 a 3
2 b 3 c - W col4 (a-a-a-c)
a 2 b 1
3 c 3 c - W col4 (b-b-b-c)
b 1 c 3
2 c 3 c
b 2 c 3 - W col1 (c-c-c-b)
3 b 3 c
c 2 a 2
2 c 1 c
a 3 c 2
3 b 2 c - L col4 (c-c-c-c)
a 3 a 1 - W col3 (using reverse slide c-c-c-c-a)
1 a 1 b     
b 3 a 2

+9
[/reveal]

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Aug 07, 12:12 PM 2011
@atlantis,
I posted this on the matrix slide thread as well.
I tested 200 consecutive lines and had 1 loss of the progression and ended with +96u profit


this is how i'm testing it
I did not play a slide if a zero was involved.
Betting both right and left slides

                     right                left             
3 A 2 C
1 0 1 B   
3 C 2 A   
1 B 2 B                   first 12 spins
2 C 3 A            l1 col2                       w col3 
3 B 3 C            w col3 
3 C 2 B   
1 C 3 A             w col2              l1 col3 
3 A 2 B                                   w col2 
1 C 1 B   
3 B 1 C              w                                  w 
3 A 1 C   
2 A 2 B   
3 C 1 A              w                     l1 
0 A 3 A                                      w 
2 C 1 C   
1 B 3 A              w                    l1 
1 B 2 C                                    w 
3 C 1 C 


vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 07, 01:23 PM 2011
Hi vunderosa,

Fantastic result! BUT, I'm afraid I cannot figure out how you've played it - are you playing vertical, horizontal or diagonal. Why have you highlighted certain lines?
Anyway congratulations on a 96u profit.

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Aug 07, 04:03 PM 2011
i am playing diagonal only right to left and left to right (slides)

                   right                left             
3 A 2 C
1 0 1 B   
3 C 2 A   
1 B 2 B                first 12 spins
2 C 3 A          l1 col2             w col3 
3 B 3 C          w col3 
3 C 2 B   
1 C 3 A          w col2              l1 col3 
3 A 2 B                                w col2 
1 C 1 B   
3 B 1 C              w                    w 
3 A 1 C   
2 A 2 B   
3 C 1 A              w                     l1 
0 A 3 A                                      w 
2 C 1 C   
1 B 3 A              w                    l1 
1 B 2 C                                    w 
3 C 1 C  
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 07, 05:54 PM 2011
Thanks Vunderosa.
I understand it now... So you play the 2 diagonals and stop at a winner. Then you begin again in the next set of 12 numbers.
A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 07, 06:17 PM 2011
Hi vunderosa,

Below I have listed some code 4 results (notice I like to play with reverse results each alternate line)
However, I don't think I played it exactly as you would have played in your above example... Guess I haven't yet grasped it completely yet..

Can you show me using the exact same results how YOU would have played it. Thanks.
In any case it will be interesting to see how your idea fares in this "alternate code 4 notation" as well as the standard code 4 recording.

[reveal]
2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c 
b 2 a 2 - first 16 results
3 b 3 a - won col2 ; won col3
a 2 c 3
3 c 2 b
c 1 c 2
3 b 3 a - won col2 ; won col3
a 1 b 2
1 b 1 a 
b 1 a 3 
3 b 3 c - lost col2 ; won col3 
c 2 a 2
1 c 3 a
c 3 a 3
1 b 3 b - won col2; lost col3
c 3 b 2
2 b 1 b
c 2 a 1
2 b 3 a - lost col2; won col3
b 1 b 3 
3 a 2 c
c 1 a 3
2 b 1 a - won col2; won col3
a 1 b 3 
2 a 2 a 
b 1 c 2 
2 c 3 b - won col2; won col3
a 1 b 3 
3 b 1 a
b 1 c 2
2 a 2 a  - won col2; won col3
b 3 c 3
3 a 3 a
b 1 a 2
1 c 2 c - won col2; won col3
a 3 b 3
3 c 2 b 
a 3 b 2
3 b 2 a - won col3; lost col3
c 2 c 1 
3 a 3 c 
a 2 b 2
2 a 1 b  - lost col3; won col4
b 2 a 3
2 b 3 c
a 2 b 1
3 c 3 c - won col2; lost col3
b 1 c 3
2 c 3 c
b 2 c 3
3 b 3 c - won col2; lost col3
c 2 a 2
2 c 1 c
a 3 c 2
3 b 2 c - won col2; won col3
[/reveal]

Regards,
A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 07, 06:27 PM 2011
Quote from: vundarosa on Aug 07, 04:03 PM 2011
i am playing diagonal only right to left and left to right (slides)

                   right                left             
3 A 2 C
1 0 1 B   
3 C 2 A   
1 B 2 B                first 12 spins
2 C 3 A          l1 col2             w col3 
3 B 3 C          w col3 
3 C 2 B   
1 C 3 A          w col2              l1 col3 
3 A 2 B                                w col2 
1 C 1 B   
3 B 1 C              w                    w 
3 A 1 C   
2 A 2 B   
3 C 1 A              w                     l1 
0 A 3 A                                      w 
2 C 1 C   
1 B 3 A              w                    l1 
1 B 2 C                                    w 
3 C 1 C
vundarosa what are you opposing?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 07, 06:39 PM 2011
Hi John,

He's playing it a totally different way. After the first 16 results have occurred he  bets that column 2 will be different result from the previous column 2 result of the same type (doz or col) The last previous result in col2 was "c" so he bets AGAINST that - and it won...
Now he bets that col3 will be different result from previous col3 result of same type (doz or col) The last previous result in col3 was "1" so he bets against that - and it won...

2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c 
b 2 a 2 - first 16 results
3 b 3 a - won col2 ; won col3
a 2 c 3
3 c 2 b
c 1 c 2
3 b 3 a - won col2 ; won col3

At least I think that's what he's doing !?   :)

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Aug 07, 07:00 PM 2011
At the moment there are so many great posts/tweaks in the game of roulette that it is difficult to keep up........ :)

I think a new level has been reached........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 07, 07:14 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Aug 07, 07:00 PM 2011
At the moment there are so many great posts/tweaks in the game of roulette that it is a difficult to keep up........ :)

I think a new level has been reached........
So do I Amk, especially Atlantis's new idea to bet against A reverse slide. Played hit and run a 26 unit risk could rival CODE 4s 80 unit progression. Ive already counted 213 no loss.

And played and won four games this evening. All on the first step. I really like his idea...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 07, 07:18 PM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Aug 07, 06:39 PM 2011
Hi John,

He's playing it a totally different way. After the first 16 results have occurred he  bets that column 2 will be different result from the previous column 2 result of the same type (doz or col) The last previous result in col2 was "c" so he bets AGAINST that - and it won...
Now he bets that col3 will be different result from previous col3 result of same type (doz or col) The last previous result in col3 was "1" so he bets against that - and it won...

2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c 
b 2 a 2 - first 16 results
3 b 3 a - won col2 ; won col3
a 2 c 3
3 c 2 b
c 1 c 2
3 b 3 a - won col2 ; won col3

At least I think that's what he's doing !?   :)e

A.
Are you sure Atlantis? Only in another post he says he is only playing DIAGONALY. I want to get this right so I can test it alongside your brilliant idea.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Aug 07, 07:27 PM 2011
I still have to catch up completely....

However, from what I see at the moment wait until a diagonal TRIPAL has been formed.......

c
  c
    c

Then bet against a right to left QUAD forming?............

atlantis's example:

c 2 a 2
2 c 1 c
a 3 c 2
3 b 2 c
a 3 a 1   
1 a 1 b     
b 3 a 2

tweak?:

c
= bets

c
  c
     c
       c
     c
   c
c
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Aug 07, 07:43 PM 2011
JohnLegend:

"I am still fascinated by Katillas Pyramid idea."

               ....doz
           2A3  .....doz/col/doz
          2B2C ..... doz/col/doz/col

etc.........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Kattila on Aug 08, 04:55 AM 2011
Hi Guys  i wonder why don t you track at the same time
two matrix s  :

hit numbers

4   11  18  25
31  8   10   3
17  27  30   9
22  24  11  34

Now put this on original code 4 and the other one
so doz/col/doz/col  and also  col/doz/col/doz

from the above numbers we have two matrix s

Matrix 1   doz/col/doz/col 

1B2A
3B1C
2C3C
2C1A

Matrix 2  col/doz/col/doz   ( from same numbers)

A1C3
A1A1
B3C1
A2B3

This can be used for the pyramid  matrix  also.

cheers


Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Aug 08, 10:11 AM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Aug 07, 07:18 PM 2011
Are you sure Atlantis? Only in another post he says he is only playing DIAGONALY. I want to get this right so I can test it alongside your brilliant idea.

---------------

hi guys, sorry i was locked out due to the forum migration...

yes i'm playing diagonaly...same as atlantis reverse slide idea...only thing is i was looking at not waiting till a loss ocurred (a foward slide formed) but just playing against the reverse formation, whatever it was.

i've virtually played another 200 lines for a total of 400 lines and saw 6 losses...not bad but to many for my liking.

one thing that stands out is the amount of first step wins...will see if playing only one bet per slide formation would yeld better results.


vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 08, 11:02 AM 2011
Quote from: amk on Aug 07, 07:27 PM 2011
I still have to catch up completely....

However, from what I see at the moment wait until a diagonal TRIPAL has been formed.......

c
  c
    c

Then bet against a right to left QUAD forming?............

atlantis's example:

c 2 a 2
2 c 1 c
a 3 c 2
3 b 2 c
a 3 a 1   
1 a 1 b     
b 3 a 2

tweak?:

c
= bets

c
  c
     c
       c
     c
   c
c
Yes Amk its good isnt it. Alternatively you could begin after a full quad slide has formed for a 26 unit risk. But it might take some time. Getting a slide playing CODE SLIDER can take a while. Ive got 213 winning results. And have now played 12 real games. I need to talk to Atlantis about dedicating a thread to the reverse slide.

Its definately worthy of its own space. The potential of this gem is enormous...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 08, 11:11 AM 2011
Quote from: vundarosa on Aug 08, 10:11 AM 2011

---------------

hi guys, sorry i was locked out due to the forum migration...

yes i'm playing diagonaly...same as atlantis reverse slide idea...only thing is i was looking at not waiting till a loss ocurred (a foward slide formed) but just playing against the reverse formation, whatever it was.

i've virtually played another 200 lines for a total of 400 lines and saw 6 losses...not bad but to many for my liking.

one thing that stands out is the amount of first step wins...will see if playing only one bet per slide formation would yeld better results.


vundarosa
Yes Vundarosa please do. As for six losses that's still a tidy profit. 400--156=244 plus. And I take it you werent playing HIT AND RUN? Also the important thing to work out. Is the wait between first step wins on average. Then you can bring the second tenet of success
into play. MONEY MANAGEMENT. And using a two or three tier staking system, capitalize on the high percentage of first step strikes.

I've played 15 real games against a column or dozen forming a reverse for CODE SLIDER. And I've won 12 on the first step, and 3 on the second. So if that kind of strikerate maintains. This is an absolute gem.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Aug 08, 11:43 AM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Aug 08, 11:11 AM 2011
Yes Vundarosa please do. As for six losses that's still a tidy profit. 400--156=244 plus. And I take it you werent playing HIT AND RUN?

---------------

JL...its actually 8 losses. I overlooked 2 on the records.
I was testing continuous play to see how HIT & RUN would do...Not yet confident is worth the risk. After a single loss in 200 consecutive lines, there were 3 losses in a 40 spins bunch and 2 losses in a 36 spins bunch in the remaining 200 consecutive lines i recorded. But there were 6 loses in 245 spins in the total of 1600 spins


ok, now the way ur testing (now playing)...your 213 results are for code4 reserve slides or the original columns reverse slide?!

will convert the lines into columns only (no dozens) and see how playing the reverse slide after a forward slide has formed would do.

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Aug 08, 11:50 AM 2011
I hope the CODE SLIDER thread will start soon........

I know patience is the name of the game but CODE SLIDER played HIT AND RUN could create the possibility of each day playing against a certain SLIDE from the start........

For example you have aaaa, cccc or bbbb, 1111, 2222, or 3333......


A unique trigger would be the X trigger, two quads crossing each other at the same time..........

A2C3
1A3B
Cxx2
xB1x      x= place bet against each quad forming.........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 08, 12:24 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Aug 08, 11:50 AM 2011
I hope the CODE SLIDER thread will start soon........

I know patience is the name of the game but CODE SLIDER played HIT AND RUN could create the possibility of each day playing against a certain SLIDE from the start........

For example you have aaaa, cccc or bbbb, 1111, 2222, or 3333......


A unique trigger would be the X trigger, two quads crossing each other at the same time..........

A2C3
1A3B
Cxx2
xB1x      x= place bet against each quad forming.........
That is VERY GOOD Amk, I see that partial X all the time. What ive NEVER seen is it completed. Weve got some great minds on this forum. WELL DONE...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 08, 12:51 PM 2011
Quote from: vundarosa on Aug 08, 11:43 AM 2011

---------------

JL...its actually 8 losses. I overlooked 2 on the records.
I was testing continuous play to see how HIT & RUN would do...Not yet confident is worth the risk. After a single loss in 200 consecutive lines, there were 3 losses in a 40 spins bunch and 2 losses in a 36 spins bunch in the remaining 200 consecutive lines i recorded. But there were 6 loses in 245 spins in the total of 1600 spins


ok, now the way your testing (now playing)...your 213 results are for code4 reserve slides or the original columns reverse slide?!

will convert the lines into columns only (no dozens) and see how playing the reverse slide after a forward slide has formed would do.

vundarosa
Yes my virtual wins are against CODE SLIDER RESULTS. I write my results down as numbers 4 wide. That alows limitless testing of all these ideas. So although the slide idea was born on COLUMNS, I was able to instantly convert to CODE 4 SCRIPT. Example,

09,12,28,33
13,27,07,29
22,22,36,11
24,12,31,BET HERE AGAINST COL C

1,C,3,C
A,3,A,3
2,A,3,B
C,1,A--Here is that partial X TRIGGER AMK has come up with. In this case win on column 2 DOZEN 1 as it ended DOZEN 3s run.




Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Aug 08, 02:10 PM 2011
JohnLegend:

1,C,3,C
A,3,A,3
2,A,3,B
C,1,A--Here is that partial X TRIGGER AMK has come up with. In this case win on column 2 DOZEN 1 as it ended DOZEN 3s run.


Thanks Johnlegend.  Due to the early stages of this method I think we have developed two X triggers.......  Yours being the faster method with much less units.............

Yours uses a configuration of 6 "locations" mine uses 8.......

3  3                     3   3
  3                         33
1  --                      33
                           3    3

Excited to see where this will all lead..............
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Aug 08, 02:26 PM 2011
Sorry.......

Your X trigger has 5 locations JohnLegend........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 08, 02:40 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Aug 08, 02:26 PM 2011
Sorry.......

Your X trigger has 5 locations JohnLegend........
Yes Weve got some serious food for thought here now AMK. The REVERSE SLIDE is looking fantastic. And I am fascinated by this X TRIGGER idea. Also can you PM me a step by step way to play Katillas Pyramid Matrix. I am still not sure about what we are opposing. I am having a blonde moment. Or I should say grey lol.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 11, 05:50 PM 2011
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 11/08/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 760

TOTAL GAMES WON 759

TOTAL GAMES LOST 1

STRIKERATE 759/1

BALANCE 1,360 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 380

STEP 2 WINS 233

STEP 3 WINS 129

STEP 4 WINS 17---LOSSES 1

At present this remains the most successful method I have ever played. Only time will tell if THE MATRIX SLIDE/REVERSE SLIDE and THE PYRAMID. Can rival or surpass this superb method.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 12, 02:35 PM 2011
Code 4 diagonal slide playing against symmetrical quads using a "winner3-type" 2doz/col progression.
(Play same level after a loss then after a win increase by 1u. Reset when level or ahead)
Not saying it's gonna be better ; just trying on previous results...

[reveal]
2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c - first 12 results
b 2 a 2 - Wcol1 1-1; Wcol4 1-1 (the bets will always be col1 or col4 or both)   +2
2 b 1 b - W 1-1; W 1-1   +4
c 2 a 1 - W 1-1; W 1-1   +6
2 b 3 a - W 1-1  +7
b 1 b 3 - W 1-1; L 1-1   +6
3 a 2 c - L 1-1; L 1-1     +2
c 1 a 3 - W 1-1; W 2-2   +5
2 b 1 a - W 2-2   +7 [reset to 1-1]
a 1 b 3 - L 1-1     +5               
2 a 2 a - W 1-1; W 2-2  +8 [reset to 1-1]   
b 1 c 2 - L 1-1; W 1-1  +7
2 c 3 b - W 2-2   +9 [reset to 1-1]         
a 1 b 3 - L 1-1     +7
3 b 1 a - W 1-1    +8
b 1 c 2 - L 2-2; L 2-2  +0
2 a 2 a  - W 2-2  +2
b 3 c 3  - W 3-3  +5
3 a 3 a  - L 3-3  -1
b 1 a 2  - W 3-3; L 4-4  -6
1 c 2 c  - L 4-4; W 4-4  -10
a 3 b 3  - W 5-5   -5
3 c 2 b  - L 5-5; W 5-5  -10
a 3 b 2  - W 6-6  -4
3 b 2 a  - W 6-6  +2
c 2 c 1  - W 6-6; W 6-6 +14 [reset to1-1]
3 a 3 c  - W 1-1   +15
a 2 b 2 -  W 1-1; L 1-1 +14
2 a 1 b -  no bet
b 2 a 3 -  no bet
2 b 3 c - W 1-1; W 1-1  +16
a 2 b 1 - L 1-1; W 1-1  +15
3 c 3 c - W 2-2; W 1-1  +18
b 1 c 3 - L 1-1; L 1-1  +14
2 c 3 c - W 1-1; W 2-2  +17
b 2 c 3 - W 2-2; W 1-1  +20
3 b 3 c - W 1-1; W 1-1  +22
c 2 a 2 - W 1-1; W 1-1   +24
2 c 1 c - L 1-1; W 1-1   +23
a 3 c 2 - L 2-2  +19
3 b 2 c - L 2-2  +15
a 3 a 1 - W 2-2; W 3-3 +20
1 a 1 b - W3-3; L 3-3 +17     
b 3 a 2 - W 3-3; W 4-4 +24 [reset to 1-1]

+24 in 184 spins.

[/reveal]

highest bet = 6-6

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 13, 01:37 AM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Aug 12, 02:35 PM 2011
Code 4 diagonal slide playing against symmetrical quads using a "winner3-type" 2doz/col progression.
(Play same level after a loss then after a win increase by 1u. Reset when level or ahead)
Not saying it's gonna be better ; just trying on previous results...

[reveal]
2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c - first 12 results
b 2 a 2 - Wcol1 1-1; Wcol4 1-1 (the bets will always be col1 or col4 or both)   +2
2 b 1 b - W 1-1; W 1-1   +4
c 2 a 1 - W 1-1; W 1-1   +6
2 b 3 a - W 1-1  +7
b 1 b 3 - W 1-1; L 1-1   +6
3 a 2 c - L 1-1; L 1-1     +2
c 1 a 3 - W 1-1; W 2-2   +5
2 b 1 a - W 2-2   +7 [reset to 1-1]
a 1 b 3 - L 1-1     +5               
2 a 2 a - W 1-1; W 2-2  +8 [reset to 1-1]   
b 1 c 2 - L 1-1; W 1-1  +7
2 c 3 b - W 2-2   +9 [reset to 1-1]         
a 1 b 3 - L 1-1     +7
3 b 1 a - W 1-1    +8
b 1 c 2 - L 2-2; L 2-2  +0
2 a 2 a  - W 2-2  +2
b 3 c 3  - W 3-3  +5
3 a 3 a  - L 3-3  -1
b 1 a 2  - W 3-3; L 4-4  -6
1 c 2 c  - L 4-4; W 4-4  -10
a 3 b 3  - W 5-5   -5
3 c 2 b  - L 5-5; W 5-5  -10
a 3 b 2  - W 6-6  -4
3 b 2 a  - W 6-6  +2
c 2 c 1  - W 6-6; W 6-6 +14 [reset to1-1]
3 a 3 c  - W 1-1   +15
a 2 b 2 -  W 1-1; L 1-1 +14
2 a 1 b -  no bet
b 2 a 3 -  no bet
2 b 3 c - W 1-1; W 1-1  +16
a 2 b 1 - L 1-1; W 1-1  +15
3 c 3 c - W 2-2; W 1-1  +18
b 1 c 3 - L 1-1; L 1-1  +14
2 c 3 c - W 1-1; W 2-2  +17
b 2 c 3 - W 2-2; W 1-1  +20
3 b 3 c - W 1-1; W 1-1  +22
c 2 a 2 - W 1-1; W 1-1   +24
2 c 1 c - L 1-1; W 1-1   +23
a 3 c 2 - L 2-2  +19
3 b 2 c - L 2-2  +15
a 3 a 1 - W 2-2; W 3-3 +20
1 a 1 b - W3-3; L 3-3 +17     
b 3 a 2 - W 3-3; W 4-4 +24 [reset to 1-1]

+24 in 184 spins.

[/reveal]

highest bet = 6-6

A.
Atlantis, I want to go ahead and post the REVERSE SLIDE on here. Are you okay about that? As its author. I have seen enough over the last week to know its a longterm winner. And possibly the greatest of them all.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on Aug 13, 04:16 AM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Aug 13, 01:37 AM 2011
Atlantis, I want to go ahead and post the REVERSE SLIDE on here. Are you okay about that? As its author. I have seen enough over the last week to know its a longterm winner. And possibly the greatest of them all.

Hi JL,

Sure. If you wish to start a new thread for that, that's perfectly fine with me. Thanks for your interest. I'm glad it seems working good. :)

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 14, 06:46 AM 2011
Quote from: atlantis on Aug 13, 04:16 AM 2011
Hi JL,

Sure. If you wish to start a new thread for that, that's perfectly fine with me. Thanks for your interest. I'm glad it seems working good. :)

A.
Thanks Atlantis, it will appear over the next couple of days...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: KoolKat on Aug 14, 12:40 PM 2011
Hi johnlegend,

Just out curiosity, on your losing game, how many more progressions would it have taken to win?

Good work Guys
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: KoolKat on Aug 17, 03:03 AM 2011
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 17/08/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 40

TOTAL GAMES WON 38

TOTAL GAMES LOST 2

STEP 1 WINS 11

STEP 2 WINS 14

STEP 3 WINS 8

STEP 4 WINS 5---LOSSES 2

This is using Skybet Uk live table. Both losses was after a zero and would have taken a progression of 6 to win.


Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Aug 17, 06:02 PM 2011
KoolKat.......

CODE 4 can deliver......

Perhaps we should cover the zero?........

Personally I think PATTERN BREAKER is the best to play.......

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: KoolKat on Aug 18, 05:06 AM 2011
Hi Amk

I have tried Pattern Breaker this morning to no avail. I am not sure if I should play PB or Pattern Filter?

Thank you for advice.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ozinkent on Aug 18, 07:57 AM 2011
I have just read this whole post.. Thank you to every one.. has made my day... (had nothing to do at work)

so now I'm really excited about testing this tonight for the first time.
will try testing with a few different betting patteren's/ progretions..

I use Ladbrooks and betfair's free demo roulette for my testing, can any 1 confirm these are truely random, and/or point me in the direction of a  real random roulette table i can test on?1 :)

ps, bit of a personal question if any 1 will answer... some of you guys are 'hit and running'.. fine/gr8, its wat i do.. but if you use real money, whats your/a good BR?? i know its very personal.. im not a pro, i user 100 units (£) and using 1's, aiming for +5 units a time... but i see some of you hit and run after 2... would you up the bet a little if your only looking to score 2 wins?? or even just walk away with £2 a time/day? just interested xD

Regards
Ozzy
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ozinkent on Aug 19, 05:27 AM 2011
Hello..

OK i didn't have a gr8 deal of time to test, but the first 30 game's (30x 4 spins, each line..) spins looked very good!.. 1 lost on 28th line due to a Zero.
i think i did, what was called 'turbo mode'... continuous betting against the 4th line above that one.

but the thing i see difficult with this is the betting progression....when to stop/how much to bet etc..

i was thinking, could one use a labouchere line as the AMOUNT to bet and the code 4 as to WHERE to bet..? i will have another go with this tonight.

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Aug 19, 06:07 PM 2011
KoolKat.......

You have to stick with PATTERN BREAKER.........

I will let you in on a secret, expect that you will lose, however, you are playing for the longrun and in the longrun you will always win........ You have to have the right BR to absorb the loses. The longrun should be at least a week of play played HIT AND RUN......

One day is not enough...........

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 19, 08:52 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Aug 19, 06:07 PM 2011
KoolKat.......

You have to stick with PATTERN BREAKER.........

I will let you in on a secret, expect that you will lose, however, you are playing for the longrun and in the longrun you will always win........ You have to have the right BR to absorb the loses. The longrun should be at least a week of play played HIT AND RUN......

One day is not enough...........
AMK speaks the truth as Pattern breakers author. I also add to this that you should play two games simultaneously. If you lose the first you step up on the second. The true power of this method is the scarceness of back to back losing games. I've never lost twice. This can't be ignored. And it means recovery is a given.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: KoolKat on Aug 20, 02:31 AM 2011
Thanks AMK, What do you suggest for BR and progression? How many games am I playing Hit and Run I.E. £1, 3 times, then end session?

Thanks AMK
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: KoolKat on Aug 20, 04:11 AM 2011
Hi Johnlegend,

When you say "simultaneously" what happens when i get HLH then a couple more spins later I get OEO these are not played togeather in the same spins does this matter?


Thanks Johnlegend
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Aug 22, 02:47 PM 2011
Hello everybody,

Just looking into CODE 4 REVERSE SLIDE........... 26 UNITS......

3A2B
1A1C
2A2C                                                                               
3A1C  = pivot point, pattern is 3A2C, now betting against same pattern forming, bets start at 2 etc.
1A2B
2A3A
1B2B  = win, 1 appeared instead of 3

I have only quickly looked at 100 continuous games.... Strikerate is 100/1. looks promising but in the game of roulette things can quickly change after thorough testing........ If a zero appears on bet 1 or 2 we take the loss and start over.........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Aug 22, 03:04 PM 2011
Another CODE 4 version.....

3
A2B     
1A1C
2A2C     A 2 is our trigger
3A2B =  Now bet against 3A2B forming................ or only 3A2

OR

3A2B
1C2C
2A1C        2 A is our trigger
3A2B

Perhaps one of the most difficult things for random to do..........?           

I call it CODE 4 ZORRO...........                               
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: airvucko on Aug 24, 05:08 AM 2011
What if we combine CODE 4 with The Fantastic 4 method,and amount of money that we put on rows put on the single numbers...

ex. we have 32 36 14 3 15 18 11 2 17 10 12 18   the next bet would be on BLACK, FIRST ROW numbers so we would fil the 2 4 6 8 10 (and 11 perhaps as a low number from the first part of the table) ???

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Aug 28, 05:02 AM 2011
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 27/08/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 920

TOTAL GAMES WON 919

TOTAL GAMES LOST 1

STRIKERATE 919/1

BALANCE 1,680 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 465

STEP 2 WINS 281

STEP 3 WINS 151

STEP 4 WINS 22---LOSSES 1

After the magnificent first winning streak of 642 games. Its back to another long winning streak for this gem. 1000/1 now looks very possible. I continue to play 2 by 2 hit and run. But as usual record 5 games every session. there have now been 10 losing games within that 5 game frame. But only one in my real play sessions. That illustrates the merit of two by two. I am a little disappointed this method hasn't drawn/sustained more interest. It delivers if you apply it properly. And it will always remain in my top 4 methods.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: stormyace on Aug 28, 06:07 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Aug 28, 05:02 AM 2011
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 27/08/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 920

TOTAL GAMES WON 919

TOTAL GAMES LOST 1

STRIKERATE 919/1

BALANCE 1,680 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 465

STEP 2 WINS 281

STEP 3 WINS 151

STEP 4 WINS 22---LOSSES 1

After the magnificent first winning streak of 642 games. Its back to another long winning streak for this gem. 1000/1 now looks very possible. I continue to play 2 by 2 hit and run. But as usual record 5 games every session. there have now been 10 losing games within that 5 game frame. But only one in my real play sessions. That illustrates the merit of two by two. I am a little disappointed this method hasn't drawn/sustained more interest. It delivers if you apply it properly. And it will always remain in my top 4 methods.

JL it is still a fairly long thread i have just joined so have a lot of reading and testing to do i did test this but busted out after 58 decisions so now down  20 units or so i kept testing using double units  back to even again so i have put this on back burner for now going with pattern breaker and reverse slide this week at least, those two seem like very solid systems

I busted out before i got a progression win so set me back a little will test again soon

Regards Rodney

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Anthony on Sep 01, 12:13 PM 2011
Hello All!

I am new here and I have been doing a lot of reading but I still can't seem to understand what 1/1 3/3 9/9 27/27 means. Can someone please explain this to me in detail?

Can Code 4 just be played with a 1,2,4,8 progression?

If anyone could answer this for me it would be greatly appreciated! Thank you very much!
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Sep 03, 04:49 AM 2011
Quote from: Anthony on Sep 01, 12:13 PM 2011
Hello All!

I am new here and I have been doing a lot of reading but I still can't seem to understand what 1/1 3/3 9/9 27/27 means. Can someone please explain this to me in detail?

Can Code 4 just be played with a 1,2,4,8 progression?

If anyone could answer this for me it would be greatly appreciated! Thank you very much!
Hello Anthony, the progression is the four steps required to play a game in order to secure 1 unit profit. Example.
1A2B--CODE 1 FOR A GAME
3B3B
3A1C
1A2C----The win here took 4 steps. Remember we are betting AGAINST CODE 1 that means we have to cover the OTHER TWO possible outcomes (barring zero) And to do this over 4 steps requires this progression 1,1--3,3,--9,9,--27,27 for a total of 80 units risk. In my example we were taken to the fourth step but won. As column C hit instead of Column B. I hope that helps you grasp it better.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Sep 04, 05:20 AM 2011
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 04/09/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 1001

TOTAL GAMES WON 1000

TOTAL GAMES LOST 1

STRIKERATE 1000/1

BALANCE 1,840 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 507

STEP 2 WINS 300

STEP 3 WINS 169

STEP 4 WINS 24---LOSSES 1

AMKs gem has reached a magnificent milestone. The best result I have ever had to date for any method. To take an 80 unit risk to a 1000/1 strikerate is a dream come true. Played 2 by 2 is the only way I would have achieved this. I have 11 losses on record. 1 of them in my live play. And 10 of them falling between the virtual games I record from 3----5. My first winning streak was a magnificent 642 now being challenged by THE REVERSE SLIDE. But to reach  1000 games only to have met one loss, is as good as it gets for such a relatively modest risk. Next update at 1,101 games played.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Chrisbis on Sep 04, 05:30 AM 2011
Hi John.
Can you tell me please, and all the others reading this Interesting Topic, what was the reason for the Lost Game?

Was it early on in the Series of results, or was it because that 'Game' fell outside the scope of the Recovery Progression You are playing?

cheers C
Edit:-
I like Ur Psychology of playing 1001 games, and showing 1000 won, as against 1000 games and 'only' having 999 won!!
Great posting!  ;)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Sep 04, 05:39 AM 2011
Quote from: Chrisbis on Sep 04, 05:30 AM 2011
Hi John.
Can you tell me please, and all the others reading this Interesting Topic, what was the reason for the Lost Game?

Was it early on in the Series of results, or was it because that 'Game' fell outside the scope of the Recovery Progression You are playing?

cheers C
Edit:-
I like your Psychology of playing 1001 games, and showing 1000 won, as against 1000 games and 'only' having 999 won!!
Great posting!  ;)
No Chris it was an ordinary game, it fell after a magnificent streak of 642 wins. So it was game 643. Now don't get me wrong I had recorded losses BEFORE I met one in REAL PLAY. But they were outside my 2 BY 2 play application. Had I played as others were doing, long 10 plus game sessions. My strikerate would now be 990/11 or worse. The whole point is to illustrate the value of playing SHORT HIT AND RUN sessions. Its the ONLY WAY to beat this game longterm with a sub 100 unit risk.

Yes 1000 is the ultimate bench mark for me. I have dreamed of that strikerate for the last decade. But have never achieved it until now. Whether THE REVERSE SLIDE can match it remains to be seen.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Sep 04, 07:01 AM 2011
Hello

Dont be 2 greedy here  ;D . Anything that approaches this strike rate is a gem. F its 1500/1  or 1000/1 its irrelevant.  U r way ahead.  Do d math  ;D


Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Sep 04, 12:27 PM 2011
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Sep 04, 07:01 AM 2011
Hello

don't be 2 greedy here  ;D . Anything that approaches this strike rate is a gem. F its 1500/1  or 1000/1 its irrelevant.  U r way ahead.  Do d math  ;D


Regards
Exactly Robeenhuut. I would be content with a consistent 160/1 but the fact that 1000/1 is possible is a great bonus. The chances are I wont make another 1000/1. But as you said You are way ahead at this point. Even if I lost five times in the next 1000 games I am way, way ahead.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: artattack on Sep 07, 03:58 PM 2011
John, just looking at your results.

With 1000 games played and only 507 wins on the 1st step, unless my math is way out, then it would be far more advantageous to bet FOR the dozen rather than against it on the 1st step only.

This would mean 493 wins at 2 to 1  rather than 1 to 2.

It also makes the rest of the progression a little easier.

But I am not too sure how the rest of the bets would handle the extra 14 losses.

I have been monitoring this system for some time and testing with real spins live wheel (while I play other systems) without betting, although I have not tested my above statement/observation.

I have just started placing bets on this system using 1/1/  3/3  15/15  27/27 so will see how it goes.

I have been testing continuous bets, and have seen just the one loss and that would put me way ahead if I had been betting.

I do play my systems hit and run as they say, It is more out of convenience rather than a method, I do not like to use that term as it seems to ruffle feathers.

I just play for 20 spins and that is it, I get fed up if I sit for too long.

End of session, so playing this continuous that results in a 4 unit win every session.

Nice one AMK

Arthur.


Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Sep 07, 04:42 PM 2011
Hello artattack............

Just an initial quick brainstorm about your approach............

4rth pattern we are betting against is 3231............

Now we bet that one of the dozens will land win the four spins?

Progression is 1,2,4,8.......

Will have to research if this can really work some how, if it can.......................
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: artattack on Sep 07, 06:13 PM 2011
it was just the 1st step of code 4 where john only had 507 wins out of 1001 sessions, that is 50% ish, this suggests to me that we are better off betting that the 1st step will hit, rather than against it

The problem though  based on johns results is there will be a further 15 losses after the 1st step for the rest of the progression to handle.
I am starting to test this, but it will take quite some time at 20 lives spins per session.  I am not too keen on recorded spins, (great for a quick test to see if it has merit) I like to use what I can see.

So with a code of  3 A 2 B  we would bet that the 1st step, the 3rd doz actually hits, and if it looses  then bet against the rest   A 2 B

Arthur.





 
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: artattack on Sep 08, 03:11 PM 2011
OK, just one more observation on code 4 for the moment.

I think some codes are stronger than others.

This is a session I have just played.

2B1A   first 4 spins
3A2o   won on 1st step  1/1 3/3 9/9 27/27
3C1A   no bet on this because of the zero above
3B1C   won on 2nd step with double stakes 2/2 6/6 18/18 54/54

I had doubled my stake on the 1st step  (2/2) because I see this as  a   stronger code.
Why stronger?  because of the two  3rd dozens in the 1st column I have noticed the rarity
of this type of formation and the two 3rd dozens becoming three.
2B1A
3A2o
3C1A
3B1C 

I did lose on the 1st step, but won my double stake on the next. 2/2 6/6 18/18 54/54

Now I see the next code even stronger, we have three 3rd dozens and two 1 dozens in the  code

2B1A
3A2o
3C1A
3B1C
3C3C   Again lost on the 1st step, but won on 2nd I played 2/2 6/6 18/18 54/54

I would normally end my session after 20 spins, but felt that the next code was also very strong
We now have four 3rd dozens in a row and two column Cs


2B1A
3A2o
3C1A
3B1C
3C3C
1NNN  Won on 1st step again using double stakes[/color] 2/2 6/6 18/18 54/54 and ended my session.So I do feel that some codes are stronger than others and are worth the increase in stake.Arthur.




         

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Sep 09, 03:10 PM 2011
Look what I found...................

link:://roulette.uk.net/quick-win-roulette-systems/code-4/ (link:://roulette.uk.net/quick-win-roulette-systems/code-4/)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: GLC on Sep 09, 04:26 PM 2011
Arty,

I appreciate your thoughts on this system.

Looks to me like we should play for the same dozen or column to win.  Flat bet and you're a winner.

You will win 494 out 1001 bets.  That means you will lose 507 and win 494X2=988 - 507 = +481.

You could also play all the 2nd bets.  You'd lose 300 and win 194X2 = 388 - 300 = +88.

Not as good results, so I wouldn't bet the 2nd bet.  Just be satisfied with the wins on the 1st bet.

Am I missing something here?

GLC
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: donik7777 on Sep 09, 04:36 PM 2011
Hello GLC!
How do you count profit? Why you multiply 492x2?
Thanks.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: artattack on Sep 09, 04:48 PM 2011
That is just how I see it on the 1st bet.

I have been playing  5/5  15/15  45/45  135/135  Total risk  400.

results so far  32 sessions

16    1st step wins        80
10    2nd step wins       50
5      3rd  step wins       25
1      4th step win            5

won so far 160, but still a long way from 1st bank.

Now, I have also been monitoring betting for the 1st column, these would be the results.

Playing     5    10/10  30/30  90/90  total risk 265

28 sessions

16  1st step wins  160
7    2nd step wins  35
4    3rd step wins   20
1    4th step wins     5

Would have won so far  220   only  45 short of 1st bank.

What seems strange in Johns records and mine is even though on the 1st bet we have a 2-1 chance of hitting it, we are only getting 50%.

Strangely enough I do not feel like betting the 2nd system i.e  for the 1st column.

This has got to be a human thing, the figures say otherwise.

I will monitor for 50 sessions then decide.

Unless John has these details in his records.

Arthur.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Sep 10, 02:06 AM 2011
Quote from: artattack on Sep 09, 04:48 PM 2011
That is just how I see it on the 1st bet.

I have been playing  5/5  15/15  45/45  135/135  Total risk  400.

results so far  32 sessions

16    1st step wins        80
10    2nd step wins       50
5      3rd  step wins       25
1      4th step win            5

won so far 160, but still a long way from 1st bank.

Now, I have also been monitoring betting for the 1st column, these would be the results.

Playing     5    10/10  30/30  90/90  total risk 265

28 sessions

16  1st step wins  160
7    2nd step wins  35
4    3rd step wins   20
1    4th step wins     5

Would have won so far  220   only  45 short of 1st bank.

What seems strange in Johns records and mine is even though on the 1st bet we have a 2-1 chance of hitting it, we are only getting 50%.

Strangely enough I do not feel like betting the 2nd system i.e  for the 1st column.

This has got to be a human thing, the figures say otherwise.

I will monitor for 50 sessions then decide.

Unless John has these details in his records.

Arthur.
Arthur you make some valid points. I began my career with this game betting on a single dozen with a method called THE ZONE. Why I dont bet for the dozen on this one is my first 1000 games is only a relatievely SMALL SAMPLE. I think youll get no argument against that. Especially from the sceptics who maintain a method must stand against millions of spins to be worth its salt/hype.

If however I reach a point (for me 5,000 PLAYED GAMES) where I see a very solid consistency in the breakdown of hits on the first and second steps of the progression. Then playing for the single dozen will make more sense. In terms of outlay and recovery. Believe it or not even after all these years, and the success ive had playing this game. I never become complacent. I have seen people do that to get anihilated by our little friend random. But then again they were always making the cardinal sin. PLAYING AGAINST THE LAYOUT.
So as I said I will always go with the best deal on the table. I still only have one loss in play on my records for this superb method but now 12 losses recorded. But in the last week I have been pushed to step 4 of the progression a dis-proportionate number of times. Compaired to my first 1000 games. So its still very early days for this method. That said it remains until now the only time I have achieved and incredible 1000/1 strikerate. I will update after breakfast. So you can see what I have been talking about.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Sep 10, 03:39 AM 2011
Quote from: artattack on Sep 07, 06:13 PM 2011
it was just the 1st step of code 4 where john only had 507 wins out of 1001 sessions, that is 50% ish, this suggests to me that we are better off betting that the 1st step will hit, rather than against it

The problem though  based on johns results is there will be a further 15 losses after the 1st step for the rest of the progression to handle.
I am starting to test this, but it will take quite some time at 20 lives spins per session.  I am not too keen on recorded spins, (great for a quick test to see if it has merit) I like to use what I can see.

So with a code of  3 A 2 B  we would bet that the 1st step, the 3rd doz actually hits, and if it loses  then bet against the rest   A 2 B

Arthur.






Well with my numbers Arthur, if we had played my results for the pattern on STEP 1 ONLY. We would have lost 507 units and won 988 units. Giving a net profit of 481 units. Looking at it in these terms. It looks like a holy one playing for the pattern. KING ARTHUR, might be the name you go by should this hold up over the longterm. And I see no reason why is shouldnt. It would take 666 hits on step 1 just to cause a break even situation. Which I cannot see ever happening. The devils advocate indeed.,,, >:D
>:D >:D Any thoughts guys? ??? ? And this is how you would prove beyond doubt that an RNG is not random. If you get more than 666 hits on STEP 1 on an RNG. You know beyond a shadow of a doubt its more rigged than an oil rig.

P.S And those figures are to level stakes. Very interesting to say the least. HOLY GRAIL? ??? ??? ?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Sep 10, 02:35 PM 2011
Helllo aurthur,

Welcome to the "round" table...............

You bring a lot of magic.............
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: artattack on Sep 10, 07:08 PM 2011
Thanks AMK.

The Round Table with 37 slots.

I have been recording all my spins recently, I now have 2926 spins that I have monitored.

From a CODE 4 perspective.

COLUMN B  has hit  976 times     maximum sleep  18      max repeat  8
1st DOZEN has hit   954 times      maximum sleep  17      max repeat  7
3rd DOZEN has hit  948 times      maximum sleep   18      max repeat  6
COLUMN A has hit   943 times      maximum sleep   25     max repeat   6
2nd DOZEN has hit  941 times      maximum sleep  16      max repeat   8
COLUMN C  has hit  924 times      maximum sleep   20     max repeat   5

That to me looks fine, but it is how they have recently fallen within the CODE 4 matrix that make it interesting.

In particular the 1st part of CODE 4 
I am still getting a hit 50% of the time just like Johns figures.

I am now currently playing CODE 4 (continuous mode) betting FOR the 1st part of the code rather than against.  5   10/10   30/30   90/90   Bankroll 265  using units of 5

Just for 20 spins though  (4 games)

I have also just started monitoring betting FOR the 1st  part of the code  and FOR the 2nd part of the code using  units   5    10   20/20   60/60    Bankroll needed 175   using units of 5

Arthur


Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Sep 10, 10:09 PM 2011
Quote from: artattack on Sep 10, 07:08 PM 2011
Thanks AMK.

The Round Table with 37 slots.

I have been recording all my spins recently, I now have 2926 spins that I have monitored.

From a CODE 4 perspective.

COLUMN B  has hit  976 times     maximum sleep  18      max repeat  8
1st DOZEN has hit   954 times      maximum sleep  17      max repeat  7
3rd DOZEN has hit  948 times      maximum sleep   18      max repeat  6
COLUMN A has hit   943 times      maximum sleep   25     max repeat   6
2nd DOZEN has hit  941 times      maximum sleep  16      max repeat   8
COLUMN C  has hit  924 times      maximum sleep   20     max repeat   5

That to me looks fine, but it is how they have recently fallen within the CODE 4 matrix that make it interesting.

In particular the 1st part of CODE 4 
I am still getting a hit 50% of the time just like Johns figures.

I am now currently playing CODE 4 (continuous mode) betting FOR the 1st part of the code rather than against.  5   10/10   30/30   90/90   Bankroll 265  using units of 5

Just for 20 spins though  (4 games)

I have also just started monitoring betting FOR the 1st  part of the code  and FOR the 2nd part of the code using  units   5    10   20/20   60/60    Bankroll needed 175   using units of 5

Arthur


-----------------

artattack, it seems you're playing your code 4 betting one line against the one just before it, not like amk had it, one line against the 3rd line ago...right?!

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: GLC on Sep 10, 10:49 PM 2011
Quote from: donik7777 on Sep 09, 04:36 PM 2011
Hello GLC!
How do you count profit? Why you multiply 492x2?
Thanks.


Don, It's because he won 507 out of 1001  1001-507 = 494 X 2 = 988.


Remember he won on the 507 betting the opposite 2 dozens.  If we bet a single dozen, we will win all the bets he lost.  When we win, we win 2 to 1.  We would have lost the 507 bets that he won on.  So subtract 507 from 988 = 481.


See JL's post.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: artattack on Sep 11, 06:10 AM 2011
Hi Vundarosa, you are correct.

I did say that I was playing continuous and not as suggested by John.

Although only for 20 spins, so I still think there is the hit and run factor.

Betting for the 1st doz in the code is still holding up for me.

After 71 sessions I have:

36  hits against the 1st doz    and 35 hits for the 1st dozen.

so it is far more profitable to bet for the 1st doz and of course less bankroll needed.

I still cannot understand why it is almost  50x50, I suspect it will change over many sessions, but John has logged a 1000 sessions and it holds up for those sessions even though John does not bet for the 1st dozen.

Arthur.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Sep 11, 10:21 AM 2011
Quote from: artattack on Sep 11, 06:10 AM 2011
Hi Vundarosa, you are correct.

I did say that I was playing continuous and not as suggested by John.

Although only for 20 spins, so I still think there is the hit and run factor.

Betting for the 1st doz in the code is still holding up for me.

After 71 sessions I have:

36  hits against the 1st doz    and 35 hits for the 1st dozen.

so it is far more profitable to bet for the 1st doz and of course less bankroll needed.

I still cannot understand why it is almost  50x50, I suspect it will change over many sessions, but John has logged a 1000 sessions and it holds up for those sessions even though John does not bet for the 1st dozen.

Arthur.
Arthur I cannot see that percentage changing dramaticaly. It would take 667 hits on step one for us to lose 1 unit. Now this is all at level stakes. We havent even begun to entertain the possibilities of using a multi level FLAT STAKING SYSTEM. Then profit will be a certainty even if there were 667 hits on step 1 out of every 1000. Or 67 out of every 100
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: artattack on Sep 11, 11:27 AM 2011
I will just keep playing and monitoring for the moment.

I will report after 100 sessions, but so far betting

Against 1st doz only using     5/5  15/15  45/45  135/135   risk  400,  I stand at 375 still short of 1st bank  (75 sessions)


For the 1st doz only using      5   10/10   30/30   90/90   risk  265   I stand at 530 and have  made 2nd bank  (71 sessions)

This is though continuous mode not as JL would play it.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Sep 11, 06:18 PM 2011
2850 bets, +177 units.........................

I am looking at developing a 3 unit profit per session method and stopping................

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Sep 11, 06:25 PM 2011
This was flat betting against the entire pattern back to back....................
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Sep 11, 06:52 PM 2011
Sorry, minor detail, betting for the pattern not against..................
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Sep 11, 07:30 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Sep 11, 06:52 PM 2011
Sorry, minor detail, betting for the pattern not against..................

-----------------

amk,

now you're getting somewhere! I've been testing betting for the pattern and the results are looking promising... i've looked so far at 1700 continuous spins and the longest i've gone without a hit on the previous line/pattern was 18 times once and 15 times twice...i was testing with a modified fibo but will also have a look at how it would perform flat betting

:thumbsup:

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: artattack on Sep 12, 07:02 PM 2011
Just an update after 101 games

Continuous betting   5/5  15/15   45/45   135/135

Betting against the dozen on the 1st step

1st step wins  58
2nd step wins 26
3rd step wins 11
4th step wins 6

no losses

Winnings 505



97 games betting for the dozen on the 1st step

1st step wins  43
2nd step wins 37
3rd step wins 13
4th step wins 3

1 loss

Winnings 430

The jury is still out for me regarding betting for or against.

I am though playing FOR the dozen on the 1st step

Arthur.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Sep 13, 10:08 AM 2011
Quote from: artattack on Sep 12, 07:02 PM 2011
Just an update after 101 games

Continuous betting   5/5  15/15   45/45   135/135

Betting against the dozen on the 1st step

1st step wins  58
2nd step wins 26
3rd step wins 11
4th step wins 6

no losses

Winnings 505



97 games betting for the dozen on the 1st step

1st step wins  43
2nd step wins 37
3rd step wins 13
4th step wins 3

1 loss

Winnings 430

The jury is still out for me regarding betting for or against.

I am though playing FOR the dozen on the 1st step

Arthur.
King Arthur, lf I tell you that youve highlighted a sleeping giant. I'm understating what we now have before us. Quite simply losing is fast leaving the arena. Even to level stakes PLAYING ONLY for a match on the first step looks like a longterm winner. I'm breaking my play down to 100 game tests.

As I've long believed random can be tamed in that marker. I had success before playing the original MATRIX 50 with this thinking. But multi level staking was essential to raise a profit margin.

Here I firmly believe we have the makings of a true HOLY GRAIL. A method that will continually profit to level stakes.

THOSE have always been the requirements for the purists. I believe this fits those requirements. Although my first 1000 game breakdown, is nowhere near a big enough sample. To draw an absolute conclusion.

There is no way I can see a big enough swing in the percentages to show negative figures. For me personally. 5000 completed games. With positive numbers, will be enough to safisfy my suspicions. When I have anorher 500 played games il post up the results.

I'm playing this one continually, yes because I really believe its as good as I've aforementioned......
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: warrior on Sep 13, 10:59 AM 2011
Quote from: artattack on Sep 12, 07:02 PM 2011
Just an update after 101 games

Continuous betting   5/5  15/15   45/45   135/135

Betting against the dozen on the 1st step

1st step wins  58
2nd step wins 26
3rd step wins 11
4th step wins 6

no losses

Winnings 505




97 games betting for the dozen on the 1st step

1st step wins  43
2nd step wins 37
3rd step wins 13
4th step wins 3

1 loss

Winnings 430

The jury is still out for me regarding betting for or against.

I am though playing FOR the dozen on the 1st step

Arthur.
can you please explain how you play exactly thanks.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: roulprofessional on Sep 13, 11:51 AM 2011
yeah..nice work
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: artattack on Sep 13, 07:10 PM 2011
Ok Warrior.

I have just played this session.

I play for just 20 spins   using this progression   

5  units for the 1st bet
2  x  10 units for the 2nd
2  x  30 units for the 3rd
2  x  60 units for the 4th

Total bank needed 265 units

this was the sequence
1C3C
2A2A
2B1A
2B3A
0B2C

The red figures are where I won



I record the 1st 4 hits

DOZ   COL   DOZ   COL
   1       C        3       C

Now bet 5 units that the next result will be in the 1st dozen

   2     the 2nd doz hit so we lost  now bet 2 x  5 units that the next result will not be COL C

   2        A    we win 5  that's the end of that run we continue to note the results to finish the line

   2        A          2        A

Time to bet again using this new code 2A2A

Now bet 5 units that the next result will be in the 2nd dozen

   2    we win 10 units here because the 2nd doz hit that's the end of that run we continue to note the results to finish the line

   2         B         1         A

Time to bet again using this new code

Now bet 5 units that the next result will be in the 2nd dozen

    2  we win 10 units here because the 2nd doz hit that's the end of that run we continue to note the results to finish the line

    2        B          3          A

Time to bet again using this new code

Now bet 5 units that the next result will be in the 2nd dozen


    O   zero came up here so lost that one now bet 2 x  5 units that the next result will not be COL B

    O        B    We lost again because we were betting   5 units on  A  and  C

                    We now bet  2  x   30  units against the 3rd Doz.

    O         B        2     we win because the 2nd doz hit. that is the end of that and my session.

the last spin not used was column C

    O         B        2        C

If a zero occurs I just carry on as if it was a loss, but  I would not use the code above if it has a zero in it for the next code.  so 0B2C would be void for the next bet.

Total profit for this one session of 4 games was 30 units

When I play my next session I start with a brand new code 4

I hope this helps.

Arthur.
   













Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Sep 13, 08:22 PM 2011
 
"Total profit for this one session of 4 games was 30 units"

-------

art,

i think your total profit was 6 units since your base unit was 5...not bad actually for such a short attack.


vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: artattack on Sep 14, 05:00 AM 2011
Hi Vundarosa.


Just to clear up.



1C3C
2A2A  won 5 units here    bet  was  5 units on 1st step (lost)  then  2 x 10 unts on 2nd step (won)
2B1A  won 10 units here  bet  was  5 units on 1st step  (won)
2B3A  won 10 units here  bet  was  5 units on 1st step  (won)
0B2C  won 5 units here   
bet  was  5 units on 1st step (lost)  then  2 x 10 unts on 2nd step (lost)  then 2 x 30 units on 3rd step (won)Arthur.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Sep 14, 03:51 PM 2011
Quote from: artattack on Sep 14, 05:00 AM 2011
Hi Vundarosa.


Just to clear up.



1C3C
2A2A  won 5 units here    bet  was  5 units on 1st step (lost)  then  2 x 10 unts on 2nd step (won)
2B1A  won 10 units here  bet  was  5 units on 1st step  (won)
2B3A  won 10 units here  bet  was  5 units on 1st step  (won)
0B2C  won 5 units here   
bet  was  5 units on 1st step (lost)  then  2 x 10 unts on 2nd step (lost)  then 2 x 30 units on 3rd step (won)Arthur.

--------------
art what i was trying to say is your BR is $265, you won $30 but you played with a base unit value of $5.....so the profit is actually 6 units/coins/chips (not 30u) of $5 value each

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: artattack on Sep 14, 05:41 PM 2011
I dont think you are quite understanding Vunderosa

1C3C
2A2A  won 5 units here    bet  was  5 units on 1st step (lost)  then  2 x 10 unts on 2nd step (won)

on this code my 1st bet was 5 units on the 1st dozen.

it lost because dozen 2 hit  so I am now down 5 units.

My next bet was  10 units on column A and 10 units on Column B  (betting against column C)

It won so that is 10 units to me, less 5  from the 1st lost so total 5 units.

end of that  game.


NEXT GAME

1C3C
2A2A 
2B1A  won 10 units here  bet  was  5 units on 1st step  (won)
no need to play the rest of the code.

So I am now up 15 units,  5 from the 1st game and 10 from this one.

And so on.

Arthur.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: artattack on Sep 16, 07:26 PM 2011
Update of results.

Playing  "against" the the 1st step (bank 400).

156  Games + 375  (0.9 banks won)

1 loss

1st  step  wins  98
2nd step wins   36
3rd step wins    15
4th step  wins    6


Playing FOR  the 1st step to match  (bank 265)

152 Games  + 500  (1.8 banks won)

2 losses

1st  step  wins  56
2nd step wins   64
3rd step wins    26
4th step  wins    4

What has dramatically changed since I started playing FOR the 1st code is 2 dozens are now hitting more than expected, when I started they were only at 50% this made betting FOR the 1st step very profitable even flat betting.

A single dozen has hit 56 times and the 2 dozens 94 times, plus 2 losses.

This has changed, but as you can see it is still working quite well.

Arthur.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Chrisbis on Sep 16, 07:30 PM 2011
These Real Money results Arthur, RX testing or Paper V Past Spins results?

Just wondered.  :-[
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Sep 17, 02:56 AM 2011
Guys out of respect for AMKs original CODE 4 method. I think we should start a fresh thread. Entitled CODE 4 REVERSE. As to not confuse newbies and observers. As to what this thread is about. I for one am still playing the ORIGINAL METHOD. And always will, its more than proven its value to me. I will start the thread title. Then we can post our results there, thankyou...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Sep 17, 03:19 AM 2011
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 16/9/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 1,121

TOTAL GAMES WON 1,120

TOTAL GAMES LOST 1

STRIKERATE 1,120/1

BALANCE 2,080 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 578

STEP 2 WINS 332

STEP 3 WINS 184

STEP 4 WINS 26---LOSSES 1

The winning goes on with this marvel. As I continue to apply the 2 by 2 play. But record 5 games per session. Total losses within that 5 game record per session remain at 12. I will continue to update CODE 4, every 100--150 games played.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: artattack on Sep 17, 07:26 AM 2011
Hi Chris.

Real money this one.

I agree with the new thread CODE 4 REVERSE.

Arthur.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Sep 26, 07:28 PM 2011
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 26/09/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 1,222

TOTAL GAMES WON 1,220

TOTAL GAMES LOST 2

STRIKERATE 610/1

BALANCE 2,120 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 632

STEP 2 WINS 358

STEP 3 WINS 202

STEP 4 WINS 28---LOSSES 2

I have caught my second loss with this great method. That brings my total to 13 recorded losses, and 2 losses suffered in live play over the 1,222 games played. I am still very satisfied with the performance of CODE 4. And it remains the most successful method ive played to date. Next update after 1,322 played games.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZigZag on Sep 26, 09:40 PM 2011
Thanks for the update John

Back on the wheel and been playing code 4 last few weeks

Your strike rate on the 1st 2nd and 3rd step gave me confidence to play code 4 just using a 3 step with a seperate 4 step in recovery mode....and having good sucess so far

I'm playing at Supercasino where i have 3 wheels to play on  :smile:

I'm using a 3 step with a 4 step in recovery mode

Supercasino allows me to play 50p on each dozen....So i use 2 seperate banks £13 for the 1/3 step and £40 for the 1/4 step (recovery) plus a little extra to cover zeros on last steps  ;)

I play all 3 wheels, one after another.....Doing about 6 full sessions on all 3 wheels (3 wheels...2 hits per wheel = 1 full session...making me £3 per session) £18 per day...I have lost a 3rd step once where i had to go into recovery mode 1/4 steps but recoverd quick in 4.5 sessions..

Already withdrawn £50  :thumbsup:

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Turner on Sep 27, 07:29 AM 2011
Hello,

Read as much of this as I can squeeze in, but I am confused about zero. Sorry if this has been addressed but its a lot of threads to digest.
In a few threads people have said" Zero, so that's a loss, so we bet the next one won't happen"
Technically zero is a win because 1,2,3,A,B,C didn't happen. that's the point. The sequence won't repeat. It didn't!

If my 3 sequence back is 13AB then I am looking for this not to happen.

Nex out are 0,3,A,B. I lose a lot of money, but technically its predicting correct. 13AB wasn't repeated. To bet against 3,A,B after 0 doesn't fit with the profile of the system.

You are betting that a 3 sequence won't happen after the first in the sequence went according to plan i.e. didn't repeat.

I don't know what the answer is, but this assumption that 0 is a loss is totally wrong. It was a win.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: woods101 on Sep 27, 01:49 PM 2011
Hi Zig,

What's your recovery prog man?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Sep 27, 04:05 PM 2011
Amazing approach ZigZag............

Glad that you are back........

Will research it further.........

Ironic that that post was your 333rd...........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ZigZag on Sep 27, 08:11 PM 2011
Cheers Amk its going ok on my first test but it wouldnt suit everyone as you may get spells where the 3 step loses come in bunches and find yourself forever in recovery mode not getting very far..Not happend to me yet..only the one 3 step loss to report so far but early days  :LoL:

Quote from: woods101 on Sep 27, 01:49 PM 2011
Hi Zig,

What's your recovery prog man?


I'm covering zero on last step now...recovery is 1-1 3-3 9-9 29-29 + 3 chips on zero
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: slatan on Sep 30, 01:50 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Sep 26, 07:28 PM 2011
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 26/09/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 1,222

TOTAL GAMES WON 1,220

TOTAL GAMES LOST 2

STRIKERATE 610/1

BALANCE 2,120 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 632

STEP 2 WINS 358

STEP 3 WINS 202

STEP 4 WINS 28---LOSSES 2

I have caught my second loss with this great method. That brings my total to 13 recorded losses, and 2 losses suffered in live play over the 1,222 games played. I am still very satisfied with the performance of CODE 4. And it remains the most successful method I've played to date. Next update after 1,322 played games.
Hi John,
Did those 2 loses that you had include  zeros?
Thanks
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Oct 03, 04:11 AM 2011
Quote from: ZigZag on Sep 27, 08:11 PM 2011
Cheers Amk its going ok on my first test but it wouldnt suit everyone as you may get spells where the 3 step loses come in bunches and find yourself forever in recovery mode not getting very far..Not happend to me yet..only the one 3 step loss to report so far but early days  :LoL:

I'm covering zero on last step now...recovery is 1-1 3-3 9-9 29-29 + 3 chips on zero
Zig Zag its good to see you back on the forum.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Oct 03, 04:15 AM 2011
Quote from: slatan on Sep 30, 01:50 PM 2011
Hi John,
Did those 2 loses that you had include  zeros?
Thanks
Hi Slatan, the first loss did. The second one didnt. Although I play two games a session. I record five. And over that span there have been 13 total losses. 9 of them contained a zero, 1 two zeros. And 3 no zeros.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Oct 03, 04:21 AM 2011
Just as a matter of interest... I created a new account on Captain Cooks Casino, they then give you 500 U$ to play with (read terms and conditions) but I then decided, that seeing this money isn't mine anyway, to go BIG or go home.


I played 45 minutes of the hour given to me, on the Euro wheel (RNG)
I played it like this... flat betting... and I played each line. For some reason the RNG couldn't cope with me playing each line, and couldn't repeat itself each line. So flat betting and only skipped the zero's


I made 100U$ in the 45 minutes of play. I then quit (the max you are allowed to win is 150U$.
I now need to make a deposit to be able to use that 100.


I just wanted to share, as I was so stoked that CODE 4 could jam up the session like that. Really funny.


Anyway, I still think CODE 4 rocks! Thanks to all the guys for the hard work and effort gone into this.Yes my own little twist to it, but the main idea is what took this!


Thanks once again!  :thumbsup:


M
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Oct 03, 04:54 AM 2011
Quote from: Maui13 on Oct 03, 04:21 AM 2011
Just as a matter of interest... I created a new account on Captain Cooks Casino, they then give you 500 U$ to play with (read terms and conditions) but I then decided, that seeing this money isn't mine anyway, to go BIG or go home.


I played 45 minutes of the hour given to me, on the Euro wheel (RNG)
I played it like this... flat betting... and I played each line. For some reason the RNG couldn't cope with me playing each line, and couldn't repeat itself each line. So flat betting and only skipped the zero's


I made 100U$ in the 45 minutes of play. I then quit (the max you are allowed to win is 150U$.
I now need to make a deposit to be able to use that 100.


I just wanted to share, as I was so stoked that CODE 4 could jam up the session like that. Really funny.


Anyway, I still think CODE 4 rocks! Thanks to all the guys for the hard work and effort gone into this.Yes my own little twist to it, but the main idea is what took this!


Thanks once again!  :thumbsup:


M
Thanks for sharing that with us Maui13
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: marivo on Oct 03, 10:36 AM 2011
Quote from: Maui13 on Oct 03, 04:21 AM 2011
I made 100U$ in the 45 minutes of play. I then quit (the max you are allowed to win is 150U$.
I now need to make a deposit to be able to use that 100.

So you cant withdraw that 100$ before you fulfill other requirements, right?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Oct 03, 12:11 PM 2011
@ Marivo Yup, just need to deposit to be able to get the 100U$, doesn't bother me though, as I'll be turning that into some more cash  :lol:



Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: marivo on Oct 03, 12:57 PM 2011
Quote from: Maui13 on Oct 03, 12:11 PM 2011
@ Marivo Yup, just need to deposit to be able to get the 100U$, doesn't bother me though, as I'll be turning that into some more cash  :LoL:

Good luck! But wagering requirements for those bonuses are usually ridiculous!
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: MadMax on Oct 04, 12:49 AM 2011
@Maui:
I´ve just read the bonus requirements of this casino. You have to wager your bonus 30 times, Roulette counts only 2% for the playthrough. That means, you have to wager your bonus 1500 x, what is a total wagering of 150000 units before you´re able to cashout. (If you just play roulette)
I don´t know if this is reachable with a basis br of 150 units because of the enormous length of the game you can expect runs with very abnorm results. Just my opinion.
Good luck, if you  try it!
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Oct 04, 03:52 AM 2011
Quote from: MadMax on Oct 04, 12:49 AM 2011
@Maui:
I´ve just read the bonus requirements of this casino. You have to wager your bonus 30 times, Roulette counts only 2% for the playthrough. That means, you have to wager your bonus 1500 x, what is a total wagering of 150000 units before you´re able to cashout. (If you just play roulette)
I don´t know if this is reachable with a basis br of 150 units because of the enormous length of the game you can expect runs with very abnorm results. Just my opinion.
Good luck, if you  try it!
Good point Mad Max. That is why I wouldnt recommend falling for the so called free bonuses handed out by these greedy casinos. They don't give you anything free believe me. They are relying on the inherent greed of most human beings, to make sure you lose long term and they PROFIT longterm.

You are better off using your own BANKROLL, and playing for small but consistent profits from the get go. GREED is one of the deadly sins when it comes to roulette or any form of gaming. don't be drawn in. You should have as much control over your play as possible. Free bonuses, with ridiculous wagering requirements take that control away COMPLETELY...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Oct 06, 12:07 AM 2011
Quote from: MadMax on Oct 04, 12:49 AM 2011
@Maui:
I´ve just read the bonus requirements of this casino. You have to wager your bonus 30 times, Roulette counts only 2% for the playthrough. That means, you have to wager your bonus 1500 x, what is a total wagering of 150000 units before you´re able to cashout. (If you just play roulette)
I don´t know if this is reachable with a basis br of 150 units because of the enormous length of the game you can expect runs with very abnorm results. Just my opinion.
Good luck, if you  try it!

---------------

those wager requirements are ridiculous!!! I play at playtech with 12x requirement and 25% for roulette. So if take $100 i'd have to wager (48x) $4800 which is much more reasonable. Ahh by the way, with playtech is *both* the deposit + bonus amount that needs to be wagered, so $100 means you'd have deposited $50 and got another $50 from the bonus.

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Oct 06, 03:16 PM 2011
JohnLegend has won 1222 games with only two losses........

That equals 4888 spins............

At one point I received 3500 live wheel spins for CODE4..........

I recorded 11 losses in 875 continual games...............

Based upon this I would prefer to play CODE4 in a HIT AND RUN fashion of two games rather then long continues games.........

It might be argued that JohnLegend is just playing one long continues session however, this first live wheel comparison of the two approaches shows a distinct difference...............
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: slatan on Oct 07, 10:19 AM 2011
Quote from: pratikpop on Oct 07, 03:07 AM 2011
wel a good news for code 4 players and even better news for AMk....i tested code4 for more than 100kspins adn the spins were of betvoyager and believe me guys it was +5000...
the progression i used was 1,3,9,27,81,243,729=approx2000 units stop-loss...and i think it is worth if the returns are so much higher
Can you test with 1,3,9,27 only and see if we are in profit?
Thanks
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: slatan on Oct 07, 11:51 AM 2011
Quote from: pratikpop on Oct 07, 10:21 AM 2011
wel i tested with that to and after 200k spins it was -222 loss
Lets wait for JL opinion on that
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: slatan on Oct 07, 12:50 PM 2011
Quote from: pratikpop on Oct 07, 12:04 PM 2011
wel jl said..u should play hit and run..whereas even if u play continously...it doesn't makes much diffrence,,,losses are bound to come..its just a matter u hit early or late..but even playing continously code4 delievers
If you play continously 1000 code4 sessions you gonna get 10 loses at least which is 80*10=800.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Oct 09, 01:53 PM 2011
Quote from: pratikpop on Oct 07, 12:04 PM 2011
wel jl said..u should play hit and run..whereas even if u play continously...it doesn't makes much diffrence,,,losses are bound to come..its just a matter u hit early or late..but even playing continously code4 delievers

What opinion do you seek guys? You all know my feelings on the matter. Without question HIT AND RUN strengthens the method SERIOUSLY. I have 13 losses recorded for CODE 4. But only 2 of these losses were caught in my 2 by 2 play application. There is no greater indication of HIT AND RUNS worth than that.

And that's for a method with 80/1 ODDS. If you take it to an extreme like you have done. You will win even better.The idea is YOU WIN. The maths boys are obsessed with overcoming random fair and square. That will never be in a realisitic play format. We have to employ HIT AND RUN and clever MONEY MANAGEMENT. There is no other way. I have this realized for over 7 years now.

And until more people come to this realization. The general consensus that ROULETTE and random are not for the taking shall remain. I don't think its possible for many people to take this onboard. Which is both good and bad for the ones who get it.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Oct 10, 12:37 AM 2011
Quote from: pratikpop on Oct 07, 03:07 AM 2011
wel a good news for code 4 players and even better news for AMk....i tested code4 for more than 100kspins adn the spins were of betvoyager and believe me guys it was +5000...
the progression i used was 1,3,9,27,81,243,729=approx2000 units stop-loss...and i think it is worth if the returns are so much higher

-----------------------

only problem is you'll not find many tables (and most will be zero tables!) that would allow bet at 729u in a way that its sensible, since your BR requirement is 2000u.
but...., it might be a good "safer" way to build a decent BR.

vundarosa

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on Oct 10, 02:00 AM 2011
Quote from: pratikpop on Oct 10, 12:41 AM 2011
yeah but i again tested with weisbaden 200k + spins and it was in -7500 loss :-\ :( and the progression i used was 1,3,9,27,81,243,729....so came to the conclusion progression is not the way to beat roulette..it can produce anything anytime ??? ??? ??? ???


-------------------

expected! zero and non-zero tables are different beasts

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Oct 10, 07:25 AM 2011
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 10/10/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 1,400

TOTAL GAMES WON 1,397

TOTAL GAMES LOST 3

STRIKERATE APPROX 466/1

BALANCE 2,156 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 703

STEP 2 WINS 418

STEP 3 WINS 247

STEP 4 WINS 29----LOSSES 3

I lost my third game in play yesterday. I played 178 games over the last 14 days. To bring my total up to a round figure. And the loss occurred in one of those extra games. That went beyond my regular 10 per calendar day. Still I am very, very pleased with my results. Next update at 1,600 games played.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Nov 09, 04:38 PM 2011
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 9/11/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 2000

TOTAL GAMES WON 1995

TOTAL GAMES LOST 5

STRIKERATE 399/1

BALANCE 3,012 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 972

STEP 2 WINS 630

STEP 3 WINS 351

STEP 4 WINS 42----LOSSES 5

AMKs masterpiece continues to deliver the goods. After 2000 completed games I have only suffered 5 losses in live play using the 2 by 2 play application. I have recorded a total of 16 losses over 5 by 5 recorded games.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Nov 09, 05:26 PM 2011
Hello JohnLegend!!

Thank you for updating. We have missed you on the forum. Croco has also had great success as you might have seen..... I might direct your attention to

link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=7852.0 (link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=7852.0)

I think Woods101 might have something special here........

Amazing how CODE4 has been performing since the journey started in June..... :)



Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Nov 09, 05:41 PM 2011
Quote from: amk on Nov 09, 05:26 PM 2011
Hello JohnLegend!!

Thank you for updating. We have missed you on the forum. Croco has also had great success as you might have seen..... I might direct your attention to

link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=7852.0 (link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=7852.0)

I think Woods101 might have something special here........

Amazing how CODE4 has been performing since the journey started in June..... :)

Yes my friend I will respond to all you have highlighted over the coming weeks. Just to let you know your other special 1 is OFF THE CHART. I will email you with my latest results over the weekend. Its pretty special.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Mudiru on Nov 11, 07:32 AM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Nov 09, 04:38 PM 2011
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 9/11/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 2000

TOTAL GAMES WON 1995

TOTAL GAMES LOST 5

STRIKERATE 399/1

BALANCE 3,012 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 972

STEP 2 WINS 630

STEP 3 WINS 351

STEP 4 WINS 42----LOSSES 5


What progression do you use for this? because it's not 1/1 3/3 9/9 27/27 if it was you had 1995 units won - 400units (5losses * 80) = 1595 PROFIT
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Nov 11, 03:03 PM 2011
Quote from: Mudiru on Nov 11, 07:32 AM 2011
What progression do you use for this? because it's not 1/1 3/3 9/9 27/27 if it was you had 1995 units won - 400units (5losses * 80) = 1595 PROFIT
I have experimented with various progressions Mudiru. The one I settled on was 2--2----6--6----18--18----54--54 For a total risk of 160 units. CODE 4 works like a dream when you get in and out in 2 game sessions. I have recorded 5 game sessions since I started. But games 3--5 are VIRTUAL just for record sake. BUT had I played them I would have 16 losses to date instead of 5.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Turner on Nov 12, 10:03 AM 2011
Hello,

1A3C
2A3A
3A3A

We bet on 2/3 as it is the opposite
Lets say I win because no.27 hits.

I dont have to wait 3 spins to get back to a 4 block again, I can start betting straight away.

We are betting against 12 spins ago repeating. If I had come to the table 1 spin later, I would be betting on that next number. My chart of 12 would be 1 spin further on so after a win, to bet on the next number with 1-1 again is correct, surely?

I'm not betting that the second of the 4 block will  be opposite columns. I am betting that the first of the next 4 is opposite dozens.

I dont write anything down. I just bet the opposite DCDC of 12 spins ago.

Turner




Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Mudiru on Nov 12, 12:27 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Nov 11, 03:03 PM 2011
I have experimented with various progressions Mudiru. The one I settled on was 2--2----6--6----18--18----54--54 For a total risk of 160 units. CODE 4 works like a dream when you get in and out in 2 game sessions. I have recorded 5 game sessions since I started. But games 3--5 are VIRTUAL just for record sake. BUT had I played them I would have 16 losses to date instead of 5.

1) What does in-and-out in 2 game sessions mean? How many times you bet using Code 4 during a session? How long do you wait between session 1 and 2?
2) What do you mean games 3--5 are Virtual? In 2000 games you lost 5 times(which is great). But the 16losses are also in these 2000games or another several thousand games?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Anthony on Dec 05, 01:22 AM 2011
Is nobody playing Code 4 anymore? Nobody has posted here in forever.....
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Dec 05, 03:21 AM 2011
Quote from: Anthony on Dec 05, 01:22 AM 2011
Is nobody playing Code 4 anymore? Nobody has posted here in forever.....

I think there is a reason for it  ;) People like to share their success stories.....

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Anthony on Dec 05, 03:55 AM 2011
I just thought from reading that this was one of the best systems around. I figured there would be a lot more chatter on this topic.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: warrior on Dec 05, 10:29 AM 2011
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Dec 05, 03:21 AM 2011
I think there is a reason for it  ;) People like to share their success stories.....

Regard




          Or there busy WINNING .
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Anthony on Dec 05, 06:34 PM 2011
Lets hope that's the case.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Dec 05, 08:09 PM 2011
Quote from: warrior on Dec 05, 10:29 AM 2011
       



          Or there busy WINNING .

Vanity always prevails  ;)

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: rossco on Dec 16, 02:56 PM 2011
Can anyone suggest a suitable progression to play CODE 4 at a casino where the minimum bet on Dozens is 2 units (by playing 2 double streets at 1 unit each), and the minimum bet on Columns is 5 units. I am wishing to minimize loss in that event. Ross.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Dec 23, 04:30 PM 2011
Hello Rossco,

You can play a 1/3/9/27 progression on four double streets. This calculation was possible due to Madmax's progression calculator. I am very bad with math and would have most likely never have figured this out without it's help as it takes a lot of math :)

Apply JohnLegend's playing method of just 1 session of 2 games back to back. No more then 5 times per day.

Much success Rossco.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: chewenhua on Dec 23, 06:19 PM 2011
hi everyone & merry christmas to all from Singapore :)

i new here and its my first post! have been reading extensively this thread recently and many thanks to u amk and also to JL for your super code4 methods and also contributions!

just wondering if anyone has any success with the Code4 ECs, as mostly the thread talks about Code4

no doubt Code 4 has 3x3x3x3 = 81 different combinations w/ a total capital outlay of 80 units. (assuming progression of 1/3/9/27) while Code 4 EC has 2x2x2x2 = 16 combinations (assuming progression of 1/2/4/8 = 15 units)

hmmm would using Code4EC be more practical on the actual tables? also, possible to expand out the Code4EC to maybe Code6ECs with a 2nd level for recovery

just for example using HighLow/OddEven/RedBlack
Code6EC = H/L O/E R/B H/L O/E R/B = 64 combinations (1/2/4/8/16/32 = 63 units)
x
H/L O/E R/B H/L O/E R/B = total of 4096 combinations? anyways, maybe this idea has already been thought about in these forums....just trying to brainstorm and create additional discussion here to a great method of play. Thanks again!!  :thumbsup:

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: chewenhua on Dec 23, 06:25 PM 2011
also i have a question of Code4

in the event of a loss..

1C1A <--- Pattern 1 Trigger
2B3C <--- Pattern 2 Trigger
2A2A <--- Virtual Line

1C1A <--- Bet vs Pattern 1 = Loss (Ouch)  ???
XXXX <---- Recovery Bet

is my next recovery Bet vs "Pattern 2 Trigger of 2B3C" or vs the pattern that i just made a loss on, which is 1C1A, thanks!@ :)


Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: chewenhua on Dec 23, 06:45 PM 2011
oh yes this is my actual set of results from a autowheel in an online casino. I am using a code 6 betting for it. 3x3x3x3x3x3 = 729 combinations. sorry for the many questions! but im just wondering if there is any difference in practical use of using Code6 vs Code4, although i have a 729 combination advantage.... and still won my bets... i almost 'fell asleep' while waiting for the wheel to spin....for triggers lol, so may not be so practical. also i was really quite amazed to see it a pattern repeat during my session

32 C2A2A1
34 C101A1
20 B3C1C2
2  A3C3A3 +W1
35 C3A3B1
35 C3A2B1 +W1
35 C1B2C3 +W1  :o
32 C2B2B2 +W2
15 B3B2C1 +W1
27 C3B3B1 +W2
18 B2B2A1 +W1
6  A1C2C0 +W1
21 B3C3A1 +W1
35 C1B2C3 +W1  :o
33 C1C1C1
13 B2C3C3 +W2
23 B3C3B2 +W1
22 B2A1B2 +W1
1  A3C1B3 +W1
31 C2A1C3 +W1
27 C2B2C3 +W1
8  A2C2C2 +W2
9  A1A3C2 +W1
8  A1C3B2 +W1
16 B1A1B3 +W1

yes i know its against the rule to bet 'continously'

Start of Session : 654 units
End of Session : 674 units
Total Profits : +20 units
Time Taken : 2 hours

W1 : 16
W2 : 4
W3 : 0
W4 : 0
W5 : 0
W6 : 0

Win/Loss Sequence : WWWLWWLWWWWWLWWWWWWLWWWW

I could get wiped out with a Code6 marty progression though if i took a hit, anyways just sharing my results! thanks

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Dec 27, 02:58 PM 2011
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 27/12/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 2,500

TOTAL GAMES WON 2,493

TOTAL GAMES LOST 7

STRIKERATE APPROX 356/1

BALANCE 3,688 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 1,229

STEP 2 WINS 761

STEP 3 WINS 445

STEP 4 WINS 58----LOSSES 7

AMKS greatest known Method continues to reap the rewards for my persistence. I lost two games in the last 500 played. Its a marvel I will always use.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Dec 27, 09:57 PM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Dec 27, 02:58 PM 2011
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 27/12/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 2,500

TOTAL GAMES WON 2,493

TOTAL GAMES LOST 7

STRIKERATE APPROX 356/1

BALANCE 3,688 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 1,229

STEP 2 WINS 761

STEP 3 WINS 445

STEP 4 WINS 58----LOSSES 7

AMKS greatest known Method continues to reap the rewards for my persistence. I lost two games in the last 500 played. Its a marvel I will always use.

Hello JL

Congrats. Great numbers. It just puzzles me that in step 1 your W/L ratio is around 50%, goes up slightly in step 2 but  you win 9 out of 10 times in 2 last steps betting on 2 DZ or 2 CL. 

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: seykid31 on Dec 28, 12:42 AM 2011
JL what units are you using.25 units,5 units.??????
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Dec 28, 02:20 PM 2011
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Dec 27, 09:57 PM 2011
Hello JL

Congrats. Great numbers. It just puzzles me that in step 1 your W/L ratio is around 50%, goes up slightly in step 2 but  you win 9 out of 10 times in 2 last steps betting on 2 DZ or 2 CL. 

Regards
This is correct Robeenhuut, but during the course of playing say 500 games there will be slight shifts in percentage breakdown for the first two steps. I always say there is more to investigate with many of these methods. Sadly we don't have people with the staying power to make that effort. They want everything done for them.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Dec 28, 02:24 PM 2011
Quote from: seykid31 on Dec 28, 12:42 AM 2011
JL what units are you using.25 units,5 units. ??? ???
I risk 160 units total on a game Seykid31 to win 2 units. So I.E
2---2------6---6-----18---18-----54---54 = Total risk 160 units.

In the beginning I experimented with staking. I was thinking of using multiple levels after a loss. But the strikerate is so strong with CODE 4 this wasn't necessary. Like it would be with a fast turnover method like DIVIDE AND CONQUER. That is when clever money management and disciplined play really pay off. And you make much faster progress. Than you would just using one staking level as I do for CODE 4 and VERTICAL 8.

One of the biggest mis-conceptions ingrained in roulette players brains, is this notion that a method MUST turn a profit purely on bet selection to level stakes to be worth a hoot. And this is one of the reasons few get anywhere with this game. The essential elements to a winning method are A, a method with a good strikerate. B, Smart use of Money Management. C, Disciplined Mindset.

To stick to the task, day in and day out. And its the third essential that remains the stumbling block for virtually every player of this game. It took me several years to clinch that resolve and iron will to stay with what works. Most will never have it. They will be system hopping their whole lives through. And never getting anywhere.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: seykid31 on Dec 29, 12:14 AM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Dec 28, 02:24 PM 2011
I risk 160 units total on a game Seykid31 to win 2 units. So I.E
2---2------6---6-----18---18-----54---54 = Total risk 160 units.

In the beginning I experimented with staking. I was thinking of using multiple levels after a loss. But the strikerate is so strong with CODE 4 this wasn't necessary. Like it would be with a fast turnover method like DIVIDE AND CONQUER. That is when clever money management and disciplined play really pay off. And you make much faster progress. Than you would just using one staking level as I do for CODE 4 and VERTICAL 8.

One of the biggest mis-conceptions ingrained in roulette players brains, is this notion that a method MUST turn a profit purely on bet selection to level stakes to be worth a hoot. And this is one of the reasons few get anywhere with this game. The essential elements to a winning method are A, a method with a good strikerate. B, Smart use of Money Management. C, Disciplined Mindset.

To stick to the task, day in and day out. And its the third essential that remains the stumbling block for virtually every player of this game. It took me several years to clinch that resolve and iron will to stay with what works. Most will never have it. They will be system hopping their whole lives through. And never getting anywhere.
Sorry i meant what chip are you using 1 dollar??
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Dec 29, 02:39 AM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Dec 28, 02:20 PM 2011
This is correct Robeenhuut, but during the course of playing say 500 games there will be slight shifts in percentage breakdown for the first two steps. I always say there is more to investigate with many of these methods. Sadly we don't have people with the staying power to make that effort. They want everything done for them.

Hello JL

i think that you missed my point. If you played 2500 games then its at least 30000 spins? i just dont see that in independent events which are 4 steps of progression you get such a different results. It seems that the deeper you go into progression your W/L ratio increases. On average it should be around 67% (2/3) but suddenly in 2 last steps you get around 90%. Try to bet against 1 DZ or CL in large number of games and your numbers should be around 67%.  I just dont see how you can get such a large fluctuations.  Only other explanation would be that in the next 2500 games the numbers will gradually even out....

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Dec 29, 06:42 PM 2011
We'll have to wait and see Robeenhuut..............

My feeling tells me all will be well for JL :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Dec 30, 12:09 PM 2011
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Dec 29, 02:39 AM 2011
Hello JL

i think that you missed my point. If you played 2500 games then its at least 30000 spins? i just don't see that in independent events which are 4 steps of progression you get such a different results. It seems that the deeper you go into progression your W/L ratio increases. On average it should be around 67% (2/3) but suddenly in 2 last steps you get around 90%. Try to bet against 1 DZ or CL in large number of games and your numbers should be around 67%.  I just don't see how you can get such a large fluctuations.  Only other explanation would be that in the next 2500 games the numbers will gradually even out....

Regards
Robeenhut it doesn't work like that with hit and run this is the value of this application. When you isolate a small number of games SOMETHING HAPPENS, THAT doesn't HAPPEN WHEN YOU PLAY CONTINUOSLY. There I have said it, your winning ratio simply doesn't pan out the way it does continually. You are fighting with what the maths fraternity tells you SHOULD HAPPEN. Like I have been sayig from the getgo, KNOWING SOMETHING CAN/WILL HAPPEN. And meeting it in REAL-TIME PLAY. Are two very different things.

They have to have rigid explanations for everything. Or they get jittery and worried that they are not in control. The truth is they never were. Random doesn't hold allegence to math. Its ebb and flow is as unpredictable as the weather. that's why the smart know no mechanical method can tame it COMPLETELY. But that doesn't mean a good method cannot be profitable, just not invincible. And that's where I stand with CODE 4 and the others.

To summarize what I am saying, yes I know what you are supposed to get given the paper odds of betting against a single dozen or column. But with Hit and Run and the constanst stop and start you are defying those paper odds. And you are hitting a bigger span of winners on THE FIRST 2 STEPS of the 4 step progression. That is why I endorse and play no more than 4 games a session. It simply works wonders.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Dec 30, 12:24 PM 2011
Quote from: seykid31 on Dec 29, 12:14 AM 2011
Sorry i meant what chip are you using 1 dollar??
No Seykid31 I live in London UK. We play for the POUND. A unit for me is worth 2 British pounds. So for CODE 4 I am playing for 4 British pounds a game.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: seykid31 on Dec 31, 04:04 AM 2011
Quote from: Johnlegend on Dec 30, 12:24 PM 2011
No Seykid31 I live in London UK. We play for the POUND. A unit for me is worth 2 British pounds. So for CODE 4 I am playing for 4 British pounds a game.
ok.So that means if you are playing 3 systems a year.You are averaging 18 000 pounds a year with roulette.Which is good i guess.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: rolf-harris on Jan 02, 08:52 PM 2012
Great news for all you Code4 fans out there....
Now you can save yourselves a lot of time spent tracking results before betting..
Just go along to random.org, enter in parameters between 1 and 36 , press a button and the guys behind the scenes there will give you a number to bet against with this system.
They must be quite clever boffins there because they have enabled me to get very similar results to those I was getting using the original Code4 technique of logging 12 spins first.
Of course, you can still play dozens and columns,  hit and run or whatever you like...but the bottom line is the results will be the same....

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jan 03, 12:38 PM 2012
Quote from: seykid31 on Dec 31, 04:04 AM 2011
ok.So that means if you are playing 3 systems a year.You are averaging 18 000 pounds a year with roulette.Which is good i guess.
Hello Seykid. I play 5 methods in any one calendar day. I have averaged 30k over the last year. But recently I am pushing harder. Methods like CODE 4 now have my absolute confidence. So I can risk a lot more than I normally would. Pattern Breaker too has extraordinary CONSISTENCY. And defies all the maths fraternity say is its due over the long haul.

Hit and run does not abide by text book math and probability. It really doesn't that's why I endorse it so ardently. If there were no benefit to its application I would say nothing. I played straight for a decade and everything the so-called experts said would happen HAPPENED. And I lost thousands.
Once I realized that cutting off randoms air supply LONGEVITY was the only way to get close or BEYOND the paper odds of a good method. I haven't looked back.

The PAPER ODDS for PATTERN BREAKER are 7/1. Played HIT AND RUN I have NEVER dropped below 10/1 And that's before I even apply smart money management.

The PAPER ODDS for a fast method DIVIDE AND CONQUER are 8/1. Played HIT AND RUN again 10/1 is the worst I have found.

Then CODE 4, Paper odds 80/1. Played hit and run I have never fallen below 300/1. And those numbers are only possible because when Random is doing its worst you are extremely unlikely to be caught in the eye of the storm. You simply aren't there the vast majority of the time.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Jan 03, 12:46 PM 2012
Quote from: rolf-harris on Jan 02, 08:52 PM 2012
Great news for all you Code4 fans out there....
Now you can save yourselves a lot of time spent tracking results before betting..
Just go along to random.org, enter in parameters between 1 and 36 , press a button and the guys behind the scenes there will give you a number to bet against with this system.
They must be quite clever boffins there because they have enabled me to get very similar results to those I was getting using the original Code4 technique of logging 12 spins first.
Of course, you can still play dozens and columns,  hit and run or whatever you like...but the bottom line is the results will be the same....
Negative Rolf, not on a real wheel they wont.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on Jan 03, 06:24 PM 2012
"I have averaged 30k over the last year."--John Legend

That's quite an accomplishment.  Congratulations  :thumbsup:

One more note: It seems the more successful players play at walk-in casinos, not online.
(I think that's my problem).

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: flukey luke on Jan 03, 06:36 PM 2012
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on Jan 03, 06:24 PM 2012
It seems the more successful players play at walk-in casinos, not online.
(I think that's my problem)


Dublinbet is one of the few online casinos that is also an actual B+M casino.

Fairway casino now have a link to another live B+M casino in Ireland. (It is not DB, I think it's called the sporting emporium club.)

If you have to compromise and play online, it makes sense to find a way to play at one of these 'live' casinos. Anything else and you are pretty much a hostage to fortune.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Wally Gator on Jan 03, 06:53 PM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jan 03, 12:38 PM 2012
Methods like CODE 4 now have my absolute confidence.
Pattern Breaker too has extraordinary CONSISTENCY.
Then CODE 4


While I won't disclose dollar amounts, I can confidently say that I've been using the above 3 methods now for about 6 months with simply incredible results.  It also means my brain was engaged while using the methods.  And, I don't say that jokingly.  Anyone can play any of these strategies into the ground and claim a negative result.   If that's your goal, my strongest recommendation is that you don't start as failure would be inevitable.  However, the opposite is true for those looking to use these tools for calculated investment.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: seykid31 on Jan 03, 11:37 PM 2012
Congratulations JL quite an accomplishment i will say.All the best for this year.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: downthehatch on Jan 16, 10:04 AM 2012
[quote author=Johnlegend link=topic=5848.msg73976#msg73976 date=1325100248]
I risk 160 units total on a game Seykid31 to win 2 units. So I.E
2---2------6---6-----18---18-----54---54 = Total risk 160 units.

In the beginning I experimented with staking. I was thinking of using multiple levels after a loss. But the strikerate is so strong with CODE 4 this wasn't necessary. Like it would be with a fast turnover method like DIVIDE AND CONQUER. That is when clever money management and disciplined play really pay off. And you make much faster progress. Than you would just using one staking level as I do for CODE 4 and VERTICAL 8.

One of the biggest mis-conceptions ingrained in roulette players brains, is this notion that a method MUST turn a profit purely on bet selection to level stakes to be worth a hoot. And this is one of the reasons few get anywhere with this game. The essential elements to a winning method are A, a method with a good strikerate. B, Smart use of Money Management. C, Disciplined Mindset.

To stick to the task, day in and day out. And its the third essential that remains the stumbling block for virtually every player of this game. It took me several years to clinch that resolve and iron will to stay with what works

. Most will never have it. They will be system hopping their whole lives through. And never getting anywhere.
[/quote]

Hi Mr JL

I'm afraid you've just described me! however Code 4 and your results have given me fresh hope i might one day win at roulette (notwithstanding lucky arbitrary wins that i mentioned in another thread)

as you are the main spokesman for Code 4 i would be very grateful if you could clarify certain points
as the many additions to this thread have confused me some what!

So i sit down at the laptop and bring up paddy power slingshot roulette

Basic play is this correct?

1. I note the previous 12 spins or chart 12 new spins. particularly dozens and columns

2.  this grid is produced for example

    1A1C  (line 1)
    3A2B  (line 2)
    1C2C  (line 3)

3. So now i bet against the 1st line appearing using 1,3,9,27 prog. or 2,6,18,54

  so i bet doz's 2&3, if lose then bet cols B&C etc

4.  ok I win on the 2nd bet Col B

5. Ok now I note the 3rd and 4th spin and this becomes the 'new' line 4.

      1B3A


6. So now we have 3 lines (the old line 1 is crossed off)

7. So now do i bet against what is now the new line 1 = 3A2B ?

I win again and using your hit and run technique, i now retire for awhile and then
later play 'Game 2' again hopefully winning twice, then later game 3 etc?

8. Re 'continuous' play (to a degree)
    if i then changed to another live table at pad pow would this compromise the 'hit and run'              principle?, say i won again, could i then log on to Victor chandler or any live casino and play the two games, i.e bouncing from one live table to another?

9. re Code 4 itself, would it be even less risky playing a sort of Code 6

i.e. you chart 12 spins, 2 lines, dozs and cols again

     1B1C2C
     2C3A3A

You then bet against the 1st line repeating using 1,3,9,27,81, 243 or some other prog?

wouldn't it be more unlikely for that pattern to appear?

my apologies if this all sounds a bit 'simple' but i seem to be a bit dyslexic trying to
understand roulette systems on paper so to speak

anyhoo thanks for your input and congrats on tremendous results

Cheer Dth















Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: downthehatch on Jan 16, 12:45 PM 2012
Hi sorry further question re Code 4

re Zero when charting spins

say i have   

   1C2B
   3A3A
   1 and then zero appears in the next 3 spins do, i simply abandon that individual line and chart a new third line?

  or abandon the all the spins and start afresh, charting a new set of 12?


also previous posters have mentioned betting on zero particularly if the line goes to the third or fourth spin? what do you recommend

Cheers Dth
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: THECATT on Feb 10, 06:42 AM 2012
Hows the fIgures looking JL?? 
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: THECATT on Feb 11, 06:16 AM 2012
Wow what a read, this is the best system i have ever come across ( hit and run). Congrats. Just one question, is there any disadvantage to spin 4 spins then start the code 4? so you are betting that the code does not come out straight after each other, cheers
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Amazin on Feb 16, 07:01 PM 2012
Ok, I still have lot to read but I have few questions.

Would it be better if we just write out all the possible combinations like a chart then just randomly select one to bet against?

What if we just bet the next combination insead after a loss?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: wagnersati on Mar 05, 06:06 PM 2012
Hello everyone!
:question:Could anyone tell me what "hit and run."
I searched the threads but not found.
I find it difficult to know due to my native language is Portuguese.

Thanks to all and congratulations for the excellent forum
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: THECATT on Mar 09, 06:19 PM 2012
HIT AND RUN is you play for a very short time and run with the profit, the less time you play the less likely you will lose..
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: nayan007 on Mar 10, 05:56 PM 2012
So that means that if you take more time means in " HIT and RUN " ,there will be alwats a chance to loss.   :-\
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: GLC on Mar 11, 04:59 PM 2012
Quote from: nayan007 on Mar 10, 05:56 PM 2012
So that means that if you take more time means in " HIT and RUN " ,there will be alwats a chance to loss.   :-\


nayan007,  Here's what I think the basic philosophy of hit-n-run is.  All systems that have been tested, to my knowledge, for 1,000,000 bets have lost.  Those same systems when only played for 50 or 100 bets have not always lost.  Many times they win.


So, in the long run the house edge starts taking over.


In the short run, anything can happen.  You can win every time, with luck.


Some systems are very stable and win gradually for about 95% of the time with a pretty big bankroll.  Occasionally you will have a loss and have to give back a chunk of your winnings.  For some that chunk will be more than they won, for others less.


So long term looks like a losing proposition.  Short term looks like there's a chance to win some.


At least we have more control over roulette systems than playing the slot machines.


GLC
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ANONYMOUS on Mar 11, 07:18 PM 2012
yeah, this is one of those things like religion, that will be debated for the rest of eternity.  :yawn:
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: wagnersati on Mar 14, 09:23 PM 2012
 ;D Ok, thank you all for the explanation.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Mar 22, 02:03 PM 2012
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 22/03/2012

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 3,500

TOTAL GAMES WON 3,489

TOTAL GAMES LOST 11

STRIKERATE APPROX 317/1

BALANCE 5,040 UNITS PLUS.

STEP 1 WINS=1,656

STEP 2 WINS=1,103

STEP 3 WINS=643

STEP 4 WINS=87----LOSSES=11

After 3,500 games the remarkable consistency of CODE 4 remains intact. The strikerate over the last 1000 games dropped off a bit. But overall its still excellent.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Mar 23, 07:07 PM 2012
Hello JohnLegend!!

It is great to have you post again! Thank you. I would like to congratulate you on your accomplishments. They are superb. I think that they illustrate how roulette can be successfully played.

Hope we may see you around more.

AMK
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: GARNabby on Mar 23, 10:24 PM 2012
Quote from: amk on Mar 23, 07:07 PM 2012
Hello JohnLegend!!  I would like to congratulate you on your accomplishments.
Yeah, a lot of "serious" story-telling.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Mar 24, 12:11 AM 2012
Quote from: GARNabby on Mar 23, 10:24 PM 2012
Yeah, a lot of "serious" story-telling.

It is my final take on this method. What puzzles me its that in continuous play its strike ratio is just better than average as some people reported and suddenly hit and run makes it so successful.
By the way does anybody else have some stats from real play?
Its like magic to me. You just play 2 games in a session and get nothing but wins but if you test it you  suddenly you get some losses. So other person that chose earlier or later entry point would get these losses. And like 600 wins in a row at some point and strike rate of 10 to 1 on the last step  if you bet against 2 DZ or CL. Its like virtually every time you play you enter the game at perfect moment and you do it without waiting for any trigger. And it happens for thousands times.
But maybe its Holy Grail?  :twisted:

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ANONYMOUS on Mar 24, 10:17 AM 2012
I know that this arguement is pointless, but you dont have to enter at the perfect time to win. You have to enter at the perfect time to LOSE everytime you step up to the table the odds are 80-1 of winning.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on Mar 24, 07:22 PM 2012
GARNabby, JohnLegend just posts his results. Only a few have applied themselves as JohnLegend has in actually play, not only testing.

Hope we get some good posts for JohnLegend.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: 6th-sense on Mar 25, 02:07 AM 2012
well amk i,ll give john legend a good post.....i think his methods and scooby doo,s approach is spot on...i,ve no bad things to say...i,ll try to help things on there way too...it should have been done a long time ago but i,ll see if i can set up some video capture program and start playing this and d&c plus and my cyclonic bet all at the same time and start showing the results of actual day by day footage...either hit and run or 100 spin sessions at a time...win or lose...minimum stakes at william hill
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Mar 25, 10:24 AM 2012
Quote from: ANONYMOUS on Mar 24, 10:17 AM 2012
I know that this arguement is pointless, but you don't have to enter at the perfect time to win. You have to enter at the perfect time to LOSE everytime you step up to the table the odds are 80-1 of winning.

Hello Anonymous

Your odds of winning if you bet against R or B  not to come up 7 times in the row is are 128-1.
And how many times did you see that happen?  I guess maybe never  hehe.

Regards

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bettor 27 on Apr 14, 08:28 PM 2012
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Mar 24, 12:11 AM 2012
What puzzles me its that in continuous play its strike ratio is just better than average as some people reported and suddenly hit and run makes it so successful.
By the way does anybody else have some stats from real play?
Its like magic to me. You just play 2 games in a session and get nothing but wins but if you test it you  suddenly you get some losses. So other person that chose earlier or later entry point would get these losses.

Here are my stats:

02-Jan   10
04-Jan   10
06-Jan   10
07-Jan   10
10-Jan   10
11-Jan   10
12-Jan   10
13-Jan   10
14-Jan   10
15-Jan   10
16-Jan   08
17-Jan   10
18-Jan   10
19-Jan   10
20-Jan   10
21-Jan   -78
22-Jan   10
23-Jan   10
24-Jan   10
25-Jan   10
26-Jan   10
29-Jan   -75
30-Jan   08

01-Feb   10
02-Feb   10
03-Feb   10
04-Feb   10
05-Feb   10
06-Feb   10
07-Feb   10
08-Feb   10
09-Feb   -74
10-Feb   10
11-Feb   08
12-Feb   10
13-Feb   09
14-Feb   10
15-Feb   10
16-Feb   10
17-Feb   10
18-Feb   10
19-Feb   10
20-Feb   10
21-Feb   09
22-Feb   10
23-Feb   10
24-Feb   10
25-Feb   10
26-Feb   -78
27-Feb   10
28-Feb   10

01-Mar   10
02-Mar   10
03-Mar   10
04-Mar   10
05-Mar   10
06-Mar   10
07-Mar   10
08-Mar   10
09-Mar   10
10-Mar   -73
11-Mar   10
12-Mar   10
13-Mar   10
14-Mar   10
15-Mar   -75
16-Mar   -80
17-Mar   10
18-Mar   10
19-Mar   10
20-Mar   10
21-Mar   10
22-Mar   10
23-Mar   10
24-Mar   10
25-Mar   10
26-Mar   10
27-Mar   10
28-Mar   10
29-Mar   10
30-Mar   10
31-Mar   10

01-Apr   08
03-Apr   10
04-Apr   10
05-Apr   10
06-Apr   10
07-Apr   10
08-Apr   10
09-Apr   10
10-Apr   10
11-Apr   -74
12-Apr   10
13-Apr   08
14-Apr   10
15-Apr   10

Total = +261

I have a feeling this will make about 700 units a year but not many people have the patience, discipline or time to play this every day for ONLY 10 games and walk away....

B27
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Apr 14, 10:47 PM 2012
Quote from: Bettor 27 on Apr 14, 08:28 PM 2012
Here are my stats:

02-Jan   10
04-Jan   10
06-Jan   10
07-Jan   10
10-Jan   10
11-Jan   10
12-Jan   10
13-Jan   10
14-Jan   10
15-Jan   10
16-Jan   08
17-Jan   10
18-Jan   10
19-Jan   10
20-Jan   10
21-Jan   -78
22-Jan   10
23-Jan   10
24-Jan   10
25-Jan   10
26-Jan   10
29-Jan   -75
30-Jan   08

01-Feb   10
02-Feb   10
03-Feb   10
04-Feb   10
05-Feb   10
06-Feb   10
07-Feb   10
08-Feb   10
09-Feb   -74
10-Feb   10
11-Feb   08
12-Feb   10
13-Feb   09
14-Feb   10
15-Feb   10
16-Feb   10
17-Feb   10
18-Feb   10
19-Feb   10
20-Feb   10
21-Feb   09
22-Feb   10
23-Feb   10
24-Feb   10
25-Feb   10
26-Feb   -78
27-Feb   10
28-Feb   10

01-Mar   10
02-Mar   10
03-Mar   10
04-Mar   10
05-Mar   10
06-Mar   10
07-Mar   10
08-Mar   10
09-Mar   10
10-Mar   -73
11-Mar   10
12-Mar   10
13-Mar   10
14-Mar   10
15-Mar   -75
16-Mar   -80
17-Mar   10
18-Mar   10
19-Mar   10
20-Mar   10
21-Mar   10
22-Mar   10
23-Mar   10
24-Mar   10
25-Mar   10
26-Mar   10
27-Mar   10
28-Mar   10
29-Mar   10
30-Mar   10
31-Mar   10

01-Apr   08
03-Apr   10
04-Apr   10
05-Apr   10
06-Apr   10
07-Apr   10
08-Apr   10
09-Apr   10
10-Apr   10
11-Apr   -74
12-Apr   10
13-Apr   08
14-Apr   10
15-Apr   10

Total = +261

I have a feeling this will make about 700 units a year but not many people have the patience, discipline or time to play this every day for ONLY 10 games and walk away....

B27

Hello Bettor 27

I guess that your strike rate is around 110/1 which makes you tiny profit. I would say that its typical for this type of bet. You lost 8 games in around 900 games played. What would happen in next 900 games is anybody guess. Most probably it should hover around 100/1 level. Anything better than 81 to 1 makes you profit. You are not as lucky as JL who at one time reported winning 600 games in a row and reports strike rate of 300/1 or better.
How many games to play a day to get best results is really anybody guess. One is certain. Playing it continuously will not work due to laws of probability in large number of events.
To me there is nothing special in this method. I used to bet against formation of last 4 DZ if there are all DZ in it. For example if 1232 you bet, if 1222 you don't bet. You have 4 bets to win like in CODE 4 and the same chance. I had similar stats like yours. Sometimes winning streaks of around 200 but few times 2 loses in a row. Its typical in hit and run type of play against any pattern.
What pattern it is does not really matter. Roulette wheel does not have memory and no matter how many spins you wait your chance of winning one bet here is exactly the same. 2/3 if you bet against
1 DZ or CL. The rest is just pure luck and if you have it you can make some profit in the long run playing in short sessions.

Regards

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bettor 27 on Apr 15, 04:31 AM 2012
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Apr 14, 10:47 PM 2012
I guess that your strike rate is around 110/1 which makes you tiny profit. I would say that its typical for this type of bet. You lost 8 games in around 900 games played. What would happen in next 900 games is anybody guess. Most probably it should hover around 100/1 level. Anything better than 81 to 1 makes you profit...

I used to bet against formation of last 4 DZ if there are all DZ in it. For example if 1232 you bet, if 1222 you don't bet. You have 4 bets to win like in CODE 4 and the same chance. I had similar stats like yours. Sometimes winning streaks of around 200 but few times 2 loses in a row. Its typical in hit and run type of play against any pattern.

Hi Robeenhuut,

I agree with you that this bet selection is nothing special - it the method - the hit and run type of play that improves the odds for the punter and provides a "typical" advantage in comparison to continual play.

My aim with this bet selection is +500 units a year.

You say your had similar stats playing against the formation of last 4 dozens - what was the end outcome of this type of play for you? Was there an advantage? Did it ever reverse all gains over the longer term?

Regards

B 27
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Apr 15, 02:16 PM 2012
Quote from: Bettor 27 on Apr 15, 04:31 AM 2012
Hi Robeenhuut,

I agree with you that this bet selection is nothing special - it the method - the hit and run type of play that improves the odds for the punter and provides a "typical" advantage in comparison to continual play.

My aim with this bet selection is +500 units a year.

You say your had similar stats playing against the formation of last 4 dozens - what was the end outcome of this type of play for you? Was there an advantage? Did it ever reverse all gains over the longer term?

Regards

B 27

I play now different systems, mostly repeaters flat or mild progression. Reverse Dz are as good a system as any Dz system except some opportunity bets. I had some success with it and never lost whole prog. I just dont like idea of risking 81 units to win 1 anymore. I generally would not  play anything with progression when you need more than  20 winning games to recover from 1 loss.
Generally i play progression with some trigger when i see some favorable conditions.

Regards 
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Apr 16, 04:33 AM 2012
@ Bettor27


Would you mind sharing more stats?


Things like how many first bet wins, 2nd, 3rd and 4th bet wins.
Why 10 games and not more/less?
Your progression? 1,3,9,27
Do you play the 10 games back 2 back, or do you play staggered during the day?


Special or not so special - doesn't really matter...what matters is that +261 after 3,5 months of play. That to me is important. ((( just imagine 100$ units...that's 7000$ per month...not to bad if you ask me.... even if you half that....still not bad!!! )))


What would be really nice is if you can post back after every month...and update your stats. If this hits the year mark with consistent profits...... well then everyone would have to decide for themselves!


I'm a believer!  :thumbsup:


Regards,
M





Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Apr 16, 07:36 AM 2012
Quote from: Maui13 on Apr 16, 04:33 AM 2012
@ Bettor27


Would you mind sharing more stats?


Things like how many first bet wins, 2nd, 3rd and 4th bet wins.
Why 10 games and not more/less?
Your progression? 1,3,9,27
Do you play the 10 games back 2 back, or do you play staggered during the day?


Special or not so special - doesn't really matter...what matters is that +261 after 3,5 months of play. That to me is important. ((( just imagine 100$ units...that's 7000$ per month...not to bad if you ask me.... even if you half that....still not bad!!! )))


What would be really nice is if you can post back after every month...and update your stats. If this hits the year mark with consistent profits...... well then everyone would have to decide for themselves!


I'm a believer!  :thumbsup:


Regards,
M

And what would you accomplish with this info?. Bettor strike rate is around 100/1,  JL reports 300/1.
Anything over 81/1 makes you profit. You might get 200 wins in a row or 2 loses in a row and you are down 1600$ playing with 10$ as a unit. Look at his betting history. Do you see 2 loses in a row? And 1 loss 50 games before?   Its pure gambling so good luck.

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Apr 16, 07:37 AM 2012
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Apr 16, 07:36 AM 2012
And what would you accomplish with this info?. Bettor strike rate is around 100/1,  JL reports 300/1.
Somebody else i probaably at 60/1. Anything over 81/1 makes you profit. You might get 200 wins in a row or 2 loses in a row and you are down 1600$ playing with 10$ as a unit. Look at his betting history. Do you see 2 loses in a row? And 1 loss 50 games before?   Its pure gambling so good luck.

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bettor 27 on Apr 17, 07:13 AM 2012
Quote from: Maui13 on Apr 16, 04:33 AM 2012
Would you mind sharing more stats?
Things like how many first bet wins, 2nd, 3rd and 4th bet wins.
Why 10 games and not more/less?
Your progression? 1,3,9,27
Do you play the 10 games back 2 back, or do you play staggered during the day?

Hi Maui13,

I dont keep stats re 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th bet wins

I use 1,3,9,27 progression on a LIVE wheel.

Method of play is:
1A3B--CODE 1 FOR GAME 1
2A2A--CODE 2 FOR GAME 2
1B3C-------------------------VIRTUAL LINE BETWEEN TRIGGERS AND GAMES
1A2C--GAME 1 WIN BET 3
3B1C--GAME 2 WIN BET 1

Then leave the table for minimum 1 hour.

Repeat this 4 more times for a total of 10 games a day

Regards

B27
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Drazen on Apr 17, 07:39 AM 2012

Please allow me just my 2 cents guys.


About progression. Have you ever thought about +2 on a lose and -1 on a win restarting whenever in plus or break even with same principales of hit and run you are using? Because it obviously works for some of you


This one could worth maybe even more than 2 cents. 5? LoL


Try using Lanky-s six point divisor plan. It is very good MM.


You can also compare some of your sessions with above mentioned progressions and see how each handles fluctations, and is there any longterm diferrence maybe?


Good luck


Drazen
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Apr 17, 08:48 AM 2012
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Apr 16, 07:36 AM 2012
And what would you accomplish with this info?. Bettor strike rate is around 100/1,  JL reports 300/1.
Anything over 81/1 makes you profit. You might get 200 wins in a row or 2 loses in a row and you are down 1600$ playing with 10$ as a unit. Look at his betting history. Do you see 2 loses in a row? And 1 loss 50 games before?  Its pure gambling so good luck.

Regards


Agreed - it's pure gambling...isn't this what roulette is about? Gambling? Everyone here seems to be happy with 2 - 5 units a day...regardless of method..... here CODE4 is doing exactly that, average 2 units a day....isn't that enough proof? The part I don't get is... "luck"??  how can luck be in profit over 3,5 months? If it was a week...so be it...but not every day play! All I'm saying is, let this roll for the year of 2012....the results should then give the verdict.


@Bettor27 - Please be so kind to post back your findings after every month!


Regards,
M
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Apr 17, 09:40 AM 2012
Quote from: Maui13 on Apr 17, 08:48 AM 2012

Agreed - it's pure gambling...isn't this what roulette is about? Gambling? Everyone here seems to be happy with 2 - 5 units a day...regardless of method..... here CODE4 is doing exactly that, average 2 units a day....isn't that enough proof? The part I don't get is... "luck"??  how can luck be in profit over 3,5 months? If it was a week...so be it...but not every day play! All I'm saying is, let this roll for the year of 2012....the results should then give the verdict.


@Bettor27 - Please be so kind to post back your findings after every month!


Regards,
M

Yeah

Its pure gambling  agreed. How about if you play a random method that lets you recover in 4 spins.  How about 1,2,4,8 marti? Once i ran a streak of 15 consecutive winning bets  betting against pattern of 5 spins of EC's. The next day i went down 21 u because i was wrong 6 times in a row.
Code 4 is not different - it offers you false sense of security by betting on some elaborate pattern with some spins delay but it boils down to 4 steps on betting of Dz or Cl. Its gamblers fallacy in a pure form.
The sooner you realize that the better - i just dont believe that people still fall for this  O0
How about imaginary Code 5 with 1 to 243 chance of losing?  Based on laws
of probability you can encounter a streak of wins in excess of 400 games quite often but 1 loss is going is going to cost you 243 units. How about 2 in a row?  If you want 2 bet like this i suggest that you pick up method with fairly low chance of losing like for example betting in 6 steps against 1 dozen repeating. 1/729 are the odds - similar to 1 Ec hitting 9 or 10 times in a row. You saw it few times already hehe? But you can have a winning streaks of excess of 1000 games but.... 1 loss is going to cost you 729 u.
Its really that simple - hit and run might make you profit for many games in a row but also destroy your BR in 2 games. I would use hit and pray term  for this type of play.
And there is no reliable data in this type of dynamic bet.  Get the sample of 1000 games and  the next sample can produce completely different results  >:D

Regards
   
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Drazen on Apr 17, 09:45 AM 2012
One way or antoher, i think you are all delusioned here with winning on every step of the progression.


When you get away yourself from that way of thinking here, maybe you will have slight better chances??


Regards


Drazen
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bettor 27 on Apr 17, 12:51 PM 2012
Quote from: drazen_cro on Apr 17, 07:39 AM 2012
About progression. Have you ever thought about +2 on a lose and -1 on a win restarting whenever in plus or break even with same principales of hit and run you are using?

Hi drazen_cro,

Here is todays result (+6) using your suggested progression - can you confirm I have it correct:

BET       W/L      PROFIT/LOSS      BALANCE
01         W         +01                     +01
01         W         +01                     +02
01         L          -02                     0
03         L          -06                     -06
05         L          -10                     -16
07         W          +07                     -09
06         W          +06                     -03
05         L          -10                     -13
07         L          -14                     -27
09         W          +09                     -18
08         L          -16                     -34
10         W          +10                     -24
09         W          +09                     -15
08         W          +08                     -07
07         W          +07                     0
06         W          +06                     +6

Regards

B27
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Drazen on Apr 17, 01:55 PM 2012
Yes my friend. Like that.

Maybe it is better to relly on spread of L-s and W-s of this method to pull you up from hole then profit from straight wins?

Because with progression like that 1W breaks even with 1L.

Now you can also make maybe some levels, but that is up to you.

Regards

Drazen
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Dutchy on Apr 17, 03:33 PM 2012
       drazen_cro,like your progression of +2 on a loss and -1 on a loss.I agree it's tough to be ahead on every step of the progression and with it you have a fighting chance of a few units,and on the cheap!
       Bettor 27 it's a winner until proven otherwise.If it's working for you stay with it.
       Robeenhuut,1/729 playing 6 steps against one dozen repeating looks mighty appealing,I'll have to check this one out.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Apr 18, 02:43 AM 2012
Quote from: drazen_cro on Apr 17, 09:45 AM 2012
One way or antoher, i think you are all delusioned here with winning on every step of the progression.



Drazen - whoever said that we are aiming to win on EVERY step of the progression???


Read the rules of CODE 4 - then feel free to comment like above if you still don't understand.


@ Robeenhuut - You are right, and I agree! My point is this - in over a 100 days (day 2 day) play there is $$$profit$$$. PERIOD  ;)


Regards
M
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on Apr 25, 07:30 AM 2012
Hi folks,

Just jumping in with my results over the last couple of weeks.

Played 84 games
Won 83
Lost 1 (3 step 1-1, 3-3, 9-9(1on zero) )

Pattern breaker 4 ruined me with some ghastly results  :sad2:...bad luck i think but Code 4 has pulled me back again thank god.  :thumbsup:

I'm oly going to play code 4 using Ophis tracker from now on until bankroll lets me break off another BR to start another method.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: warrior on Apr 25, 07:34 AM 2012
Quote from: subby on Apr 25, 07:30 AM 2012
Hi folks,

Just jumping in with my results over the last couple of weeks.

Played 84 games
Won 83
Lost 1 (3 step 1-1, 3-3, 9-9(1on zero) )

Pattern breaker 4 ruined me with some ghastly results  :sad2: ...bad luck i think but Code 4 has pulled me back again thank God.  :thumbsup:

I'm oly going to play code 4 using Ophis tracker from now on until bankroll lets me break off another BR to start another method.
MY HYBRID IS EVEN BETTER RESULTS MORE BETTING.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on Apr 25, 10:06 AM 2012
@ Warrior - explain "HYBRID"


Sounds wicked!


Regards,
M
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: warrior on Apr 25, 10:16 AM 2012
Quote from: Maui13 on Apr 25, 10:06 AM 2012
@ Warrior - explain "HYBRID"


Sounds wicked!


Regards,
M
The system is under hybrid dc4 full system section
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on Apr 27, 12:13 PM 2012
I'll have a look :)

It's not in the tracker software though, would be immense if it was
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: unre4lbg on May 02, 02:38 AM 2012
Hey guys how many times in a row has anyone LOST in the first bet? I see that the most Wins has the first bet and im wondering what if betting only the first bet, and even maybe after a loss waiting for a paper win before placing a pet again?  :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 03, 03:16 AM 2012
Update for Code 4 bets only

Played 154 games
Won 153
Lost 1

Betting on all 4 steps now 1-1, 3-3, 9-9(1 on zero), 27-27(3 on zero)

Betting 1 unit at a time = £1

Green bean on the 27-27 has saved me twice now so running the luck engine on fumes at the moment lol

Starting BR = £600 : Current BR £801 due to a nice £1 on a 150:1 outside bet on some chinese football game

Withdrawn some money as well to replace initial BR. Need to withdraw £240 more to recoup my initial BR deposit.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: unre4lbg on May 05, 05:42 AM 2012
Hey what u think about this progression

1-1 // 3-3 // 5-5 // 9-9

In the first 3 ill end up on +, and on the last stage will broke even. I see from the statistics of all u guys that most of the time u win on the first 2 stages, and at some point on the third and forth.

Dont u think this can be more safe, as a loss would not be so much (only 36 units) which can be quickly recovered because from what the statistics shows, most of the time the first and second stage of the progression will be winning. :)

Please tell me what u think. :)

Im playing code4 now and so far its great, 15 games played, 15 won ,never got to third step yet. Thinking of getting bigger bankroll and playing for only 4 units a day.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 07, 08:52 AM 2012
That progression is not bad for someone with a small BR. I've now taken out my initial BR so I'm playing on pure profit now :)

I'm playing my same 1-1, 3-3, 9-9, 27-27 and still going strong. Looking at 12-15 units a day for me playing 4 different live tables within paddypower, 3 times a day

a total loss for me is about 85 units and I now have 10 times that in my BR so looking good :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: justanothergambler on May 07, 08:25 PM 2012
Why dnt you bet only the 2 first stages since they are more frequent winning. progression 1-1 3-3 , take the loss of 8 better than 50 something.

I ve seen also that from your stats you win the first almost half of the time and the second 1/3 of the time . so you are left with another half and third. so, instead of betting against, bet FOR , you will be beting only one doz or col at time ! you win 2 instead of one which will make your progression even flexible , kind of : 1 1 2 3 with this you bet for a match in all the line .
if you loose .. 7u!  next you can increase you progression to level 2:
3 3...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: unre4lbg on May 08, 10:12 AM 2012
Hey guys anyone  flatbetting this??  Lets say we bet only the first 2 stages, flatbetting, as  they have the most hit ratio, can anyone give any feedback? :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 10, 10:49 AM 2012
I personally don't flat bet code 4. I use the tracker and just play it with what it tells me to bet. Still looking great for me :)

LOVE LOVE LOVE this method to play on a live table only...no RNG remember
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on May 10, 06:11 PM 2012
Subby!

Take a look at CODE ∞ in the testing zone, see how it goes live wheel 4 you.........
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: unre4lbg on May 13, 05:58 AM 2012
Wondering if anyone plays like donik7777 , I'm trying his method and its quite safe, risking less units ,more of the time should be even, when ahead go away.. take a rest, few sessions only..  what u think :)

The thing is im looking for a method risking less units, winning less units. looking for a 1-2 units a day, and im starting to think different variations of code 4 is the answer  O0 Keeping in mind that GREED KILLs and Everything is bound to loose in the longterm .. :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on May 13, 10:01 AM 2012
Quote from: unre4lbg on May 13, 05:58 AM 2012
Wondering if anyone plays like donik7777 , I'm trying his method and its quite safe, risking less units ,more of the time should be even, when ahead go away.. take a rest, few sessions only..  what u think :)

The thing is I'm looking for a method risking less units, winning less units. looking for a 1-2 units a day, and I'm starting to think different variations of code 4 is the answer  O0 Keeping in mind that GREED KILLs and Everything is bound to lose in the longterm .. :)

Ok. U risk 81 units 2 win 1 u. 4 me its not particularly safe method considering waiting time and win 2 loss ratio but maybe its not so bad option considering whats out there  :smile:
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: unre4lbg on May 13, 10:32 AM 2012
Well flat betting like he said 1-1/1-1 , or the more aggressive method 1-1/3-3 ,we keep the bets low, the winnings low and the losses low. Switching to the original code 4 method, if we stuck up in sort of a grinding method.. I'm playing online air shot wheel 30-40 spins sessions, recording the original code 4 method, when the first two stages of the original progression lose, i bet on the 3-4 flatbetting, aiming for 2 units, I'm playing with 0,50p chips, 40 units bankroll, if luck and patience are by my side i should manage to get my 2 units everyday in the next 18 days and increase my base unit and continue testing :).

From my recordings so far:

43 Originally CODE 4 games played = 43 WON
(2 times taken to forth step)

From donik7777 method :

8 Games played = 8 WON / 6 Wins and 2 Loss flatbetting :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 13, 12:10 PM 2012
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Mar 24, 12:11 AM 2012
It is my final take on this method. What puzzles me its that in continuous play its strike ratio is just better than average as some people reported and suddenly hit and run makes it so successful.
By the way does anybody else have some stats from real play?
Its like magic to me. You just play 2 games in a session and get nothing but wins but if you test it you  suddenly you get some losses. So other person that chose earlier or later entry point would get these losses. And like 600 wins in a row at some point and strike rate of 10 to 1 on the last step  if you bet against 2 DZ or CL. Its like virtually every time you play you enter the game at perfect moment and you do it without waiting for any trigger. And it happens for thousands times.
But maybe its Holy Grail?  :twisted:

Regards
Robeenhutt the reason CODE 4 especially has more outstanding results played hit and run than say Pattern Breaker or Divide and Conquer is you have larger odds to start with. Now I am about to update the method. I have never seen a better method than CODE 4 its a masterpiece. What you learn over time is to read between the lines. For example. Most of my wins come in the first two steps of the progression. But when there is a game that goes beyond the first two steps. The game directly following nearly ALWAYS wins in the first two steps. These observations are gold nuggets. I have never seen two losing games in a row. And I have never lost on two consecutive days. I continue to record four games a session even though I only play the first 2 games. And let me tell you the losses do happen. But I will have to say this till my dying day with some people because it just cant sink in. DONT BE THERE.
If the paper odds are 80/1 yes you could lose at anytime we all know that. But random has to be spot on to get you in such a tight playing span. And I will tell you something else im surprised by this methods consistency more than anyone. Played tightly and in a disciplined manner. Its a lifetime roulette beater be sure of that.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: unre4lbg on May 13, 12:22 PM 2012
@JL never seeing two loosing games in a row means, that if we loss, then we should hit hard the next line? Just saying.. :)

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 13, 01:05 PM 2012
Quote from: unre4lbg on May 13, 12:22 PM 2012
@JL never seeing two losing games in a row means, that if we loss, then we should hit hard the next line? Just saying.. :)
You could certainly increase your stakes especially as the win is highly likely in the first two steps.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on May 13, 01:41 PM 2012
Hello John

Its possible 2 play such a method n have results like this. I basically question everything here because its my nature. Let me give you an example: i play right now a method based on repeats amongst lines or double streets.  My strike ratio is now 371 to 1 and on paper it should be around 30 or 40 to 1.  Is it a fluke? Maybe but im happy with my results so far n i feel that some correction is due but 2 go from 370/1 2 40/1 it would require a very bad run. 
So maybe CODE4 falls in d same category although some people reported strike ratio barely over 100/1 n its ok because it still falls into a positive territory.
But definitely you can not play any method over long period of time.
Hit'n'run might not help you but definitely wont hurt you. Play few games a day with larger units n be patient n disciplined.  Kiss - keep it simple sam  :-[

Good luck n regards

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on May 13, 05:23 PM 2012
Hello JohnLegend!

Great to have you post again. Inspiring. Can't believe that it is almost a year ago that this journey began. I don't think you can go wrong playing CODE 4 with 3 BR's. Although CODE 4 is fine as it is and does not need improving I can't help but wonder. After all, its how CODE 4 was created. I feel that CODE ∞ could have an even higher strikerate and could be played for longer sessions. Hope you might journey down this path JohnLegend, if you have the time that is :)

Hope you will have some more post for us.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 13, 06:41 PM 2012
Update for Code 4

Played 478 games
Won 477
Lost 1

yes lost 1 and that was when I only went to the 3rd bet then stopped not risking the 27-27 fourth progression bet.

Since 1st May I've managed to withdraw £1,100 winnings and STILL have a BR of over £1000 - This seriously is a revelation...thanks to all who contributed to Code 4 and also Ophes?? (guy who coded it into the tracker) It's so easy to use that tracker
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 13, 06:49 PM 2012
 :twisted:

I think I should actually refrain from taking out too much too quick....

Having far too many withdrawals....I think I'll just keep growing the BR instead of taking out money every time I hit a certain level of BR.

Anyone got any thoughts on when to withdraw money without becoming flagged as winning too much?

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ausguy on May 14, 04:26 AM 2012
Subby - I don't think it matters too much which way you withdraw your winnings. This is because the casinos accounts people have your win/loss records from day 1 you opened your account.
As long as you comply with all their terms and conditions you should be paid your wins on request.

I suggest you take any winnings out at regular intervals rather than accumulate a large amount as the casino may find some excuse not to pay out on large amounts?

Some players get into trouble with winnings because they take up casino bonus offers. As you have already made withdrawals I assume you avoid the bonus trap?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 15, 07:36 AM 2012
I didn't take up any bonus offers so I could withdraw as and when I pleased. Bonuses are not worth taking due to betting requirements to withdraw.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 15, 02:03 PM 2012
Quote from: amk on May 13, 05:23 PM 2012
Hello JohnLegend!

Great to have you post again. Inspiring. Can't believe that it is almost a year ago that this journey began. I don't think you can go wrong playing CODE 4 with 3 BR's. Although CODE 4 is fine as it is and does not need improving I can't help but wonder. After all, its how CODE 4 was created. I feel that CODE ∞ could have an even higher strikerate and could be played for longer sessions. Hope you might journey down this path JohnLegend, if you have the time that is :)

Hope you will have some more post for us.
Hi AMK email me or PM your thoughts on your new idea. I will certainly take a look, right now its update night as I have reached 4,500 games played for CODE 4. Thats how I will update it from now on after every additional 1,000 games played.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 15, 02:29 PM 2012
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 15/05/12

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 4,500

TOTAL GAMES WON 4,485

TOTAL GAMES LOST 15

STRIKERATE 299/1

BALANCE 6,400 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS=2,107

STEP 2 WINS=1,392

STEP 3 WINS=878

STEP 4 WINS=108----LOSSES=15

The last 1,000 games I have played has been my least sucessful period to date. I believe this is because I am playing a greater volume of games per calendar day exposing myself a little more to randoms ebb and flow than I was in the beginning. Nevertheless. 249/1 over the last 1,000 games is still very positive. This is how those losses came within the 1,000 game span.

273 won 1 lost

506 won 1 lost

49 won 1 lost

108 won 1 lost----current winning streak 60 games.

As you can see its possible to win several hundred games between losses. Then have shorter periods. I have never lost two games in a row. In fact theres always been at least 20 winning games between losses. This method is my main bread and butter method at present.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 15, 02:44 PM 2012
Quote from: Robeenhuut on May 13, 01:41 PM 2012
Hello John

Its possible 2 play such a method n have results like this. I basically question everything here because its my nature. Let me give you an example: i play right now a method based on repeats amongst lines or double streets.  My strike ratio is now 371 to 1 and on paper it should be around 30 or 40 to 1.  Is it a fluke? Maybe but I'm happy with my results so far n i feel that some correction is due but 2 go from 370/1 2 40/1 it would require a very bad run. 
So maybe CODE4 falls in d same category although some people reported strike ratio barely over 100/1 n its ok because it still falls into a positive territory.
But definitely you can not play any method over long period of time.
Hit'n'run might not help you but definitely won't hurt you. Play few games a day with larger units n be patient n disciplined.  Kiss - keep it simple sam  :-[

Good luck n regards
Hello Robeenhutt in Roulette many extremes are possible. Our job is to exploit those that work in our favour. Some people? If they play exactly as I advocate they will garner similar results. Its the human factor that makes or breaks you with any method. I can't instill iron discipline into anyones brain. They have to dig deep and find it for themselves. For virtually all its too much to ask. The inherent greed factor that most human beings have assures they will fail or perform poorly. the human mind is and always will be the make or break factor with this game.

I for example under no circumstances play more than 20 games in a calendar day UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES. I may play less if I have a busy schedule. BUT NEVER MORE. How many people could really adhere to this over a lengthy period of time. VERY FEW?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 15, 03:32 PM 2012
Quote from: subby on May 13, 06:41 PM 2012
Update for Code 4

Played 478 games
Won 477
Lost 1

yes lost 1 and that was when I only went to the 3rd bet then stopped not risking the 27-27 fourth progression bet.

Since 1st May I've managed to withdraw £1,100 winnings and STILL have a BR of over £1000 - This seriously is a revelation...thanks to all who contributed to Code 4 and also Ophes?? (guy who coded it into the tracker) It's so easy to use that tracker
Hello Subby thats phenomenal results if youve only lost once on step 3 in nearly 500 games. Well done.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 16, 12:29 PM 2012
Well I had a bit of bad luck. Was betting £2 units...I'd just moved up from £1 units as well  :-\

Anyway....I was taken to the 4th Bet and was supposed to go 81-81 (£162 and £162) with 10 on zero but I didn't notice the tracker and instead of using columns I used dozens and lost. Was gutted and I didn't step back...I got a huge rush of blood and went to the 5th Bet 243-243 £486 and £486) and I forgot to cover zero with a £50 bet.....zero dropped in and I smiled to myself thinking I'd recovered and won a bit on the 1800 I was due....my heart dropped when I realised I'd not covered zero in time. Id spent time working out the 5th bet amounts and I didn't leave myself enough time to cover zero.

I'm taking a couple of weeks to move house then I'm starting back again. All in all I'm still up a couple of hundred but I'd withdrawn that amount and bought a computer for my daughter.

I still believe this method is the way forward played hit and run like I was doing.

John can I ask you what way you record wins...do you have a spreadsheet or what? I would like to find something easy to use...notepad file perhaps?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 16, 01:18 PM 2012
Quote from: subby on May 16, 12:29 PM 2012
Well I had a bit of bad luck. Was betting £2 units...I'd just moved up from £1 units as well  :-\

Anyway....I was taken to the 4th Bet and was supposed to go 81-81 (£162 and £162) with 10 on zero but I didn't notice the tracker and instead of using columns I used dozens and lost. Was gutted and I didn't step back...I got a huge rush of blood and went to the 5th Bet 243-243 £486 and £486) and I forgot to cover zero with a £50 bet.....zero dropped in and I smiled to myself thinking I'd recovered and won a bit on the 1800 I was due....my heart dropped when I realised I'd not covered zero in time. Id spent time working out the 5th bet amounts and I didn't leave myself enough time to cover zero.

I'm taking a couple of weeks to move house then I'm starting back again. All in all I'm still up a couple of hundred but I'd withdrawn that amount and bought a computer for my daughter.

I still believe this method is the way forward played hit and run like I was doing.

John can I ask you what way you record wins...do you have a spreadsheet or what? I would like to find something easy to use...notepad file perhaps?
Hello Subby you are making a classic mistake. Moving up too fast. Youve had a phenomenal run of success but its your bankroll that should dictate your growth in risk not your confidence. That said yours was a mistake of judgement rather than random biting you.
KEEP IT SIMPLE. The best tracker on earth remains your eyes and pen and paper. that's what I use. I am not into trackers and rackers. Just plain eyes on the ball. You say you play hit and run. What is your personal employment of this. 1,2,4,10 games per session??

In my case it remains TWO games per session with the third and fourth games simply recorded to strengthen my belief that hit and run played in short bursts is a superior application to straight long drawn out sessions. AND IT IS. To illustrate this. Had I even played just 4 game sessions since I started using AMKs gem. Instead of 15 losing games to date. I would have 34. That proves to me beyond a shadow of a doubt two by two is the superior choice.

To give you an indication of where you should have been before you moved up to 2 units per game. Your total bankroll should be AT LEAST 10 times the size of your total risk for any given game. Ideally 20 times bigger.Also I don't cover zero and you shouldnt stretch to a 5th bet. Its going beyond the parameters of the game and the reality of where you are. I have made over 6,000 units with CODE 4 and I wouldnt play a fifth step.

I know the temptation is always there especially when you get off to a flying start like you did. your confidence is sky high and you start to feel invincible. Complacency and the feeling that you can risk larger sums NOW creeps in. I've been there made every classic mistake a gambler can make and lost thousands in the process. They were all lessons hard learnt.
Finding the discipline to play this game properly is one thing. maintaining it is quite something else again. Well that's my tuppence on the matter. I hope you will recover when you're-commence and push forward sensibly.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: wolfat on May 16, 01:20 PM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 15, 02:29 PM 2012
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 15/05/12

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 4,500

TOTAL GAMES WON 4,485

TOTAL GAMES LOST 15

STRIKERATE 299/1

BALANCE 6,400 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS=2,107

STEP 2 WINS=1,392

STEP 3 WINS=878

STEP 4 WINS=108----LOSSES=15

The last 1,000 games I have played has been my least sucessful period to date. I believe this is because I am playing a greater volume of games per calendar day exposing myself a little more to randoms ebb and flow than I was in the beginning. Nevertheless. 249/1 over the last 1,000 games is still very positive. This is how those losses came within the 1,000 game span.

273 won 1 lost

506 won 1 lost

49 won 1 lost

108 won 1 lost----current winning streak 60 games.

As you can see its possible to win several hundred games between losses. Then have shorter periods. I have never lost two games in a row. In fact theres always been at least 20 winning games between losses. This method is my main bread and butter method at present.
HI JL,
compiments for your hard work!
I noticed 1 thing. You played 4500 games where you get a win in the 1st step 2107 times. This means that if I play the same system BUT AGAINST your bet selection (say if you have to play doz 1 and 3 instead I bet doz 2) I win 2393 times (4500-2107) = +4786 units flat betting (around 1 unit per game) at really no risk and this just betting the 1st step.
What do you think?  8)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 16, 01:32 PM 2012
Quote from: wolfat on May 16, 01:20 PM 2012
HI JL,
compiments for your hard work!
I noticed 1 thing. You played 4500 games where you get a win in the 1st step 2107 times. This means that if I play the same system BUT AGAINST your bet selection (say if you have to play doz 1 and 3 instead I bet doz 2) I win 2393 times (4500-2107) = +4786 units flat betting (around 1 unit per game) at really no risk and this just betting the 1st step.
What do you think?  8)
Yes that is interesting isnt it. Why didn't I think of that? LoL The thing is you need to play a large number of games to see that clearly. I have had sessions in a calendar day where out of the 20 games played 14 or more won on the first step sometimes 5 or 6 games in a row. It swings and roundabouts. But your reverse idea flat betting is indeed worth investigating.
Over the long haul it may be a grail a pure grail as it meets all the requirments of the purists. Hmmm food for thought. The Wolfat commeth. Great observation.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 16, 02:45 PM 2012
Hi JohnL,

Yes it is definately interesting:

Play 1-1-1-2 progression on each line for SAME AS ABOVE doz/col
Stop at any winner on the line!

1a3a - start line
1c1a - w2                             +2
2c1b - L1,w2                         +3
1c2a - L1,w2                         +4
3c1a - L1,w2                         +5
3c1c - w2                              +7
3b2b - w2                              +9
1c3b - L1,L1,L1,w4                 +10
2b1c - L1,L1,L1,L2                 +5
2c2b - w2                              +7
2c1c - w2                              +9
2c2c - w2                              +11
1c1b - L1,w2                          +12
3a2b - L1,L1,L1,w4                 +13
1c2b - L1,L1,w2                     +13
1c1b - w2                              +15
3c2b - L1, w2                         +16
2b3a - L1,L1,L1,L2                 +11
2b2b - w2                              +13
2c2a - w2                              +15
1a3b - L1,L1,L1,L2                 +10   
1c1a - w2                              +12
3a1b - L1,L1,w2                      +12
1c2b - L1,L1,L1,w4                 +13
3a1a - L1,L1,L1,L2                 +8
1c2a - L1,L1,L1,w4                 +9
1a3a - w2                               +11
1a1b - w2                               +13
3a1a - L1,w2                           +14
2b1a - L1,L1,w2                      +14
1c1b - L1,L1,w2                      +14
1c1a - w2                               +16
1c1b - w2                               +18
2b3b - L1,L1,L1,w4                  +19
1a3b - L1,L1,w2                      +19
3a2c - L1,w2                           +20
stop
+20

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 16, 03:21 PM 2012
Quote from: atlantis on May 16, 02:45 PM 2012
Hi JohnL,

Yes it is definately interesting:

Play 1-1-1-2 progression on each line for SAME AS ABOVE doz/col
Stop at any winner on the line!

1a3a - start line
1c1a - w2                             +2
2c1b - L1,w2                         +3
1c2a - L1,w2                         +4
3c1a - L1,w2                         +5
3c1c - w2                              +7
3b2b - w2                              +9
1c3b - L1,L1,L1,w4                 +10
2b1c - L1,L1,L1,L2                 +5
2c2b - w2                              +7
2c1c - w2                              +9
2c2c - w2                              +11
1c1b - L1,w2                          +12
3a2b - L1,L1,L1,w4                 +13
1c2b - L1,L1,w2                     +13
1c1b - w2                              +15
3c2b - L1, w2                         +16
2b3a - L1,L1,L1,L2                 +11
2b2b - w2                              +13
2c2a - w2                              +15
1a3b - L1,L1,L1,L2                 +10   
1c1a - w2                              +12
3a1b - L1,L1,w2                      +12
1c2b - L1,L1,L1,w4                 +13
3a1a - L1,L1,L1,L2                 +8
1c2a - L1,L1,L1,w4                 +9
1a3a - w2                               +11
1a1b - w2                               +13
3a1a - L1,w2                           +14
2b1a - L1,L1,w2                      +14
1c1b - L1,L1,w2                      +14
1c1a - w2                               +16
1c1b - w2                               +18
2b3b - L1,L1,L1,w4                  +19
1a3b - L1,L1,w2                      +19
3a2c - L1,w2                           +20
stop
+20

A.
Hi Atlantis great to hear from you again. I don't know about betting everyone I've seen 14 consecutive spins without a match. This is a longhaul method. You might turn a profit over a week rather than daily. Just wading over some past results since Wolfat lit the fuse. I can count 8 step one games in a row including ZERO where there wasn't a match. But what's interesting is over a LARGER SAMPLE. There is a always positive numbers. And if using a slight progression as youre in your bet till a win application. Something very powerful is cooking here at a relatively low risk to the user. I like, I like very much. Here for example is the first five games I played today.

2A1A
3A1A
1A2A
2C1C----WIN STEP 2---But a win STEP 1 with Wolfats reverse idea

3A1A
1A2A
2C1C
2B3A----WIN STEP 1---A loss for Wolfats reverse idea.

1B1C
2A1C
2C1C
2A2Z----WIN STEP 1---A loss for Wolfats reverse idea

2A1C
2C1C
2A2Z
2B3A----A WIN STEP 2---A WIN STEP 1 for Wolfats reverse idea

3C2C
2A2B
3B1B
3A2B----A WIN STEP 2---A WIN STEP 1 for Wolfats reverse idea.

I don't know if Wolfats the first person to really notice this. But this may be one of the greatest observations in betting history. Something to seriously investigate over the future.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 16, 03:44 PM 2012
Hi JL,

Here I am taking my same results and playing as you play code 4 (4th line against first) but same betting/rules as I did last time - playing for MATCH:

1a3a
1c1a
2c1b
1c2a - w2                     +2

3c1a
3c1c
3b2b
1c3b - L1,w2                 +3

2b1c
2c2b
2c1c
2c2c - w2                      +5
               
1c1b
3a2b
1c2b
1c1b - w2                      +7
         
3c2b
2b3a
2b2b
2c2a - L1, w2                  +8

1a3b     
1c1a
3a1b
1c2b - w2                       +10

3a1a
1c2a
1a3a
1a1b - L1,w2                  +11

3a1a
2b1a
1c1b
1c1a - L1,L1,w2             +11

1c1b
2b3b
1a3b
3a2c  -L1,L1,L1,L2         +6   

stop
+6

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 16, 03:45 PM 2012
Quote from: drazen_cro on May 16, 03:34 PM 2012
No he is not.
Reversed bet on double dozens is one part of Richard XXXV-s professional play with matrix bets.

You can read about that in his thread. You can apply that on any double dozen/column method.
Such as divide and conquer for example also.

Best

Drazen
Okay I know people have thought about that before. I have myself. The Zone was all about a single dozen or column. What I mean is applying it to the CODE 4 framework. Already it looks like a roulette killer even flat betting. And at little risk so no one can complain about risky progressions.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 16, 03:47 PM 2012
Quote from: atlantis on May 16, 03:44 PM 2012
Hi JL,

Here I am taking my same results and playing as you play code 4 (4th line against first) but same betting/rules as I did last time:

1a3a
1c1a
2c1b
1c2a - w2                     +2

3c1a
3c1c
3b2b
1c3b - L1,w2                 +3

2b1c
2c2b
2c1c
2c2c - w2                      +5
               
1c1b
3a2b
1c2b
1c1b - w2                      +7
         
3c2b
2b3a
2b2b
2c2a - L1, w2                  +8

1a3b     
1c1a
3a1b
1c2b - w2                       +10

3a1a
1c2a
1a3a
1a1b - L1,w2                  +11

3a1a
2b1a
1c1b
1c1a - L1,L1,w2             +11

1c1b
2b3b
1a3b
3a2c  -L1,L1,L1,L2         +6   

stop
+6

A.
I'm liking this Atlantis its got appeal for everyone if it really holds up. Its a thing of beauty. In your example I think anytime you hit double figures in profit its the signal to stop that session. Nice work.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 16, 03:56 PM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 16, 01:18 PM 2012
Hello Subby you are making a classic mistake. Moving up too fast. Youve had a phenomenal run of success but its your bankroll that should dictate your growth in risk not your confidence. That said yours was a mistake of judgement rather than random biting you.
KEEP IT SIMPLE. The best tracker on earth remains your eyes and pen and paper. that's what I use. I am not into trackers and rackers. Just plain eyes on the ball. You say you play hit and run. What is your personal employment of this. 1,2,4,10 games per session??

-I play paddy power live so first table would be sling shot, then roulette, then if it's playing, London roulette then high roller table then back to sling shot table and stop. You're looking at 5 games then stopping...or I was playing that at the start before I got a bit arrogant.  :sad2:



In my case it remains TWO games per session with the third and fourth games simply recorded to strengthen my belief that hit and run played in short bursts is a superior application to straight long drawn out sessions. AND IT IS. To illustrate this. Had I even played just 4 game sessions since I started using AMKs gem. Instead of 15 losing games to date. I would have 34. That proves to me beyond a shadow of a doubt two by two is the superior choice.


To give you an indication of where you should have been before you moved up to 2 units per game. Your total bankroll should be AT LEAST 10 times the size of your total risk for any given game. Ideally 20 times bigger.Also I don't cover zero and you shouldnt stretch to a 5th bet. Its going beyond the parameters of the game and the reality of where you are. I have made over 6,000 units with CODE 4 and I wouldnt play a fifth step.

I know the temptation is always there especially when you get off to a flying start like you did. your confidence is sky high and you start to feel invincible. Complacency and the feeling that you can risk larger sums NOW creeps in. I've been there made every classic mistake a gambler can make and lost thousands in the process. They were all lessons hard learnt.

-This was one very expensive humble pie considering I'd taken time to play it properly and then I got lazy counting back 12 numbers and betting instead of waiting for the 12 to be spun. I also went and started playing poker while I was waiting at £5 a hand so my BR wasn't really growing much so I thought if I whacked it up to £2 units from £1 units value....I'd make money and still be able to play poker too....now I know that was a BIG mistake. It took my eye off what I was supposed to be doing relentlessly and I messed it up. Duly noted for next time. :'(


Finding the discipline to play this game properly is one thing. maintaining it is quite something else again. Well that's my tuppence on the matter. I hope you will recover when you're-commence and push forward sensibly.

-You speak sense again and perhaps I needed to read that last paragraph a week ago. I'll come back to it again when I'm back to where I was at with a nice BR and money withdrawn to spend in real life. :thumbsup:

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 16, 04:04 PM 2012
You are welcome although theres been a sensational twist on CODE 4 tonight if youve read the recent posts. You could come back to it without having to risk 80 units a game.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 16, 04:11 PM 2012
I'd like to hear about it when someone has put some real amounts of spins through it to see if it works. In theory it's a reverse code 4, which code 4 is immense, but I still can't get my head around it.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 16, 04:14 PM 2012
Let me get this...so instead of doing 1-1, 3-3, 9-9 type bets we bet that the line above will match, we are only doing one single unit bet ON it to match?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 16, 04:17 PM 2012
Would it not take an age to play that amount of spins though? That's a LOT of spins there...45 seconds a spin, It'll soon add up to serious hours.

Code 4 is quicker yes so could we somehow reduce time needed for this new twist of the code 4 in terms of spins?


link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=5848.msg79438#msg79438 (link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=5848.msg79438#msg79438)
The numbers of spins in that are huge 108 spins @ 45 secs a spin is 81 mins...over an hour and 20 mins.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 16, 05:30 PM 2012
Quote from: subby on May 16, 04:17 PM 2012
Would it not take an age to play that amount of spins though? That's a LOT of spins there...45 seconds a spin, It'll soon add up to serious hours.

Code 4 is quicker yes so could we somehow reduce time needed for this new twist of the code 4 in terms of spins?


link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=5848.msg79438#msg79438 (link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=5848.msg79438#msg79438)
The numbers of spins in that are huge 108 spins @ 45 secs a spin is 81 mins...over an hour and 20 mins.
Subby there is no real difference in time. Only the attack a game can be over in the same number of spins as the normal CODE 4. Atlantis was just giving his twist on things. Playing several lines until a satisfactory level of profit was attained. The major advantage here if this is as good as it looks over time is the risk to reward factor. We have to appologize to AMK for littering his original and great CODE 4 with this new twist. I think we must/should start a fresh thread.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on May 17, 05:03 AM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 16, 03:45 PM 2012
Okay I know people have thought about that before. I have myself. The Zone was all about a single dozen or column. What I mean is applying it to the CODE 4 framework. Already it looks like a roulette killer even flat betting. And at little risk so no one can complain about risky progressions.

---------------

Hi JL.
I remember the zone.... Actually i revisited it some time ago and tried applying the concept to C4 just as A & Wolf suggested, in a search for a true 2:1 bet. I've tested for over 10K consecutive spins and it looked interesting. I can't remember why i gave up on the testing but one thing that stood up to me at that time was that playing the 4wide matrix only on doz gave better results than C4 style. This was betting as Atlantis first pointed out, for a single match to the line directly above it.
I will wander through the results if there's something worth to highlight

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: wolfat on May 17, 06:10 AM 2012
Quote from: wolfat on May 16, 01:20 PM 2012
HI JL,
compiments for your hard work!
I noticed 1 thing. You played 4500 games where you get a win in the 1st step 2107 times. This means that if I play the same system BUT AGAINST your bet selection (say if you have to play doz 1 and 3 instead I bet doz 2) I win 2393 times (4500-2107) = +4786 units flat betting (around 1 unit per game) at really no risk and this just betting the 1st step.
What do you think?  8)
JL,
I revised the math:
the gain is: (2393x2) - 2107 = +2679 net (flat betting)
notice that step 1 wins just 46% of total games instead of 66% (betting 2 doz)
that's why REVERSE CODE 4 wins. the dozen played hits like an EC but with double rewarding.
it would be interesting to know what's the distance between hitting dozens, to calculate the bankroll needed to overcome drawdowns.
IMO, when the game is setted:
DZ X X X
DZ X X X
DZ X X X
BET SAME AS DZ 3 LINES ABOVE (continously)
if you say that's dangerous for original code 4, this should be favorable for reverse
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: intrinseco on May 17, 06:20 AM 2012
Hi everybody, I have made some test with rx

my results on link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=9518.0 (link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=9518.0)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: roulettefan on May 17, 06:35 AM 2012
jeff i have watch your test good job

one think important to do is to make the same test you have done on another 18k spin totally different

in order to see if we have the same kind of result
if its true that the more space between playing the more best result we got ?

i have rx on my computer
can you please send me code
shaftmusic@gmail.com

best
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 17, 08:16 AM 2012
Hi wolfat,

Quote
in my opinion, when the game is setted:
DZ X X X
DZ X X X
DZ X X X
BET SAME AS DZ 3 LINES ABOVE (continously)
if you say that's dangerous for original code 4, this should be favorable for reverse

I tested 41 separate games using step 1 (DZ only) as you intimated, betting same doz as 3 lines above.

17 wins at 2u  = 34u
24 lost at 1u    = 24u

Profit= +10u

Lowest bankroll -2
Longest Losing Run=5
Longest Winning Run=5

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on May 17, 09:03 AM 2012
I tested 100+ games  playing opposite CODE 4.  Balance is +7u with some up and down swings.
Actually it produced better results than expected.
Its another hit'n'run result and nothing to be gained from if you want to leave dangerously.

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 17, 09:23 AM 2012
Quote from: Robeenhuut on May 17, 09:03 AM 2012
I tested 100+ games  playing opposite CODE 4.  Balance is +7u with some up and down swings.
Actually it produced better results than expected.
Its another hit'n'run result and nothing to be gained from if you want to leave dangerously.

Hi Robeenhuut,

My second test over 100 spins - playing continuously step 1 as Wolfat described. Flatbetting 1 unit.

:lllll:wwlllwll:wll

Bets = 25
13 won  = +26
12 lost   = -12
Profit = +14
Max d/down = 5
LLR = 5
LWR = 5

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on May 17, 09:41 AM 2012
Hello Atlantis

We need more tests. I dont want to put down any method just for sake of it.  But there is not any successful method out there based on 1/3 chance so im always very doubtful.  Producing 4 consecutive successful  bets on a constant basis is a tough proposition.


Regards 
 
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 17, 12:47 PM 2012
Quote from: Robeenhuut on May 17, 09:41 AM 2012
Hello Atlantis

We need more tests. I don't want to put down any method just for sake of it.  But there is not any successful method out there based on 1/3 chance so I'm always very doubtful.  Producing 4 consecutive successful  bets on a constant basis is a tough proposition.


Regards 

Robeenhuut well there is NOW. Ive been testing this all day. Its dynamite. It works for the very same reason the normal CODE4 works. We arent asking random to do anything other than what its been doing since this game was invented. Weve simply highlighted a window of profit oppurtunity. And there are no excuses here because the risk is very small. All those who cry oh but 80 units is too much to risk to win 1 unit. About the original concept have no argument here.
Or you shouldnt be in this game at all. There are two approaches to CODE 4 REVERSE ATTACK. Wolfats idea and Atlantis's idea. And they are both WINNERS. I assure you now. Test, test and test some nore. It will be as plain as day to you too. I have begun risking real money on this already. I know its a winner.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 17, 12:51 PM 2012
Quote from: atlantis on May 17, 09:23 AM 2012
Hi Robeenhuut,

My second test over 100 spins - playing continuously step 1 as Wolfat described. Flatbetting 1 unit.

:lllll:wwlllwll:wll

Bets = 25
13 won  = +26
12 lost   = -12
Profit = +14
Max d/down = 5
LLR = 5
LWR = 5

A.
I think this is dynamite Atlantis. We need a new thread for this. I dont want to author it. It should be either you or Wolfat who does so. What do you think??
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vundarosa on May 17, 09:58 PM 2012
Quote from: wolfat on May 17, 06:10 AM 2012
JL,
I revised the math:
the gain is: (2393x2) - 2107 = +2679 net (flat betting)
notice that step 1 wins just 46% of total games instead of 66% (betting 2 doz)
that's why REVERSE CODE 4 wins. the dozen played hits like an EC but with double rewarding.
it would be interesting to know what's the distance between hitting dozens, to calculate the bankroll needed to overcome drawdowns.
in my opinion, when the game is setted:
DZ X X X
DZ X X X
DZ X X X
BET SAME AS DZ 3 LINES ABOVE (continously)
if you say that's dangerous for original code 4, this should be favorable for reverse

----------------------------
Not sure that would work wolfat, ok, so looking at my past results, 10k spins sample, i logged:
*for 10 missed bets before a match i have thirteen times
*for 11 missed bets before a match i have nine times
*for 12 missed bets before a match i have eight times
*for 13 missed bets before a match i have four times. Two of those went to 17 missed bets before a match. The other two stopped at 14 missed bets before a match

it seems it behaves just like any other 2:1 bet method.

vundarosa
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on May 18, 02:26 AM 2012
I've also been silently observing the "play for the results" and because it almost plays like EC's, I went looking for the perfect money management. (couple of weeks ago)


Yes it's not flat betting, but the progression in itself gives you soooooo many chances, together with a good strike rate


George (GLC) under Money Management put down an EC progression


link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=5787.0 (link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=5787.0)


Would we not be able to combine that, with this new twist on CODE 4 ?


Just my 2C


Regards
M
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 18, 07:02 AM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 16, 03:21 PM 2012
Hi Atlantis great to hear from you again. I don't know about betting everyone I've seen 14 consecutive spins without a match. This is a longhaul method. You might turn a profit over a week rather than daily. Just wading over some past results since Wolfat lit the fuse. I can count 8 step one games in a row including ZERO where there wasn't a match. But what's interesting is over a LARGER SAMPLE. There is a always positive numbers. And if using a slight progression as youre in your bet till a win application. Something very powerful is cooking here at a relatively low risk to the user. I like, I like very much. Here for example is the first five games I played today.

2A1A
3A1A
1A2A
2C1C----WIN STEP 2---But a win STEP 1 with Wolfats reverse idea

3A1A
1A2A
2C1C
2B3A----WIN STEP 1---A loss for Wolfats reverse idea.

1B1C
2A1C
2C1C
2A2Z----WIN STEP 1---A loss for Wolfats reverse idea

2A1C
2C1C
2A2Z
2B3A----A WIN STEP 2---A WIN STEP 1 for Wolfats reverse idea

3C2C
2A2B
3B1B
3A2B----A WIN STEP 2---A WIN STEP 1 for Wolfats reverse idea.

I don't know if Wolfats the first person to really notice this. But this may be one of the greatest observations in betting history. Something to seriously investigate over the future.


Hi JL,

This seems a good way to play the 'reverse' code 4 to me.
To speed up you could bet the same as every third line up as wolfat suggested and use the 1-1-1-2 mild progression on each line as I showed earlier...
Hit'n'run when small profit achieved (e.g.. +3 or +4) or grind out until hopefully profit made if in negative  - or accept small loss to be recovered next time?
Here are JL's same results played that way - remember stop at a winner on each line!

2A1A
3A1A
1A2A - first 3 lines recorded.
2C1C -  w2                     +2
3A1A - w2                      +4**stop here??
1A2A - w2                      +6
2C1C - w2                      +8
2B3A - L1,L1,L1,W4      +9
1B1C - w2                      +11
2A1C - w2                      +13
2C1C - w2                      +15
2A2Z - L1,L1,L1,L2       +9
2A1C - w2                      +11
2C1C - w2                      +13
2A2Z - w2                      +15
2B3A - w2                      +17
3C2C - L1, w2                +18
2A2B - w2                      +20
3B1B - L1,w2                 +21
3A2B - w2                      +23

Vunderosa wrote:
Quote
Not sure that would work wolfat, ok, so looking at my past results, 10k spins sample, i logged:
*for 10 missed bets before a match i have thirteen times
*for 11 missed bets before a match i have nine times
*for 12 missed bets before a match i have eight times
*for 13 missed bets before a match i have four times. Two of those went to 17 missed bets before a match. The other two stopped at 14 missed bets before a match

it seems it behaves just like any other 2:1 bet method.
Hi vunderosa. Yes but that is only for ONE vertical column is it not? - In above example I show betting on more than one vertical column. Sometimes when one column is not matching the other ones are (even 3 lines up)  so you can make a small profit or be level - so no outright loss on that line - except when you lose complete 1-1-1-2 progression which happened once on JL's results above.


Regards,
Atlantis.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on May 18, 09:52 AM 2012
Hello Atlantis

I agree with you. i tested around 250 games and usually if you up max 5 units its good idea to get out.
I played betting on each line and had 6 double loses and 1 triple loss. Its still too early to say anything definitive but it shows some promise. But only hit and run after few units up. Had one session when went down 17u after 18 games after triple loss. Maybe its good idea to wait after a loss for a virtual win?
Streaks of 7 wins or more in a row are possible so... we will see.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 18, 10:06 AM 2012
Quote from: Robeenhuut on May 18, 09:52 AM 2012
I agree with you. i tested around 250 games and usually if you up max 5 units its good idea to get out.
I played betting on each line and had 6 double loses and 1 triple loss. Its still too early to say anything definitive but it shows some promise. But only hit and run after few units up. Had one session when went down 17u after 18 games after triple loss. Maybe its good idea to wait after a loss for a virtual win?
Streaks of 7 wins or more in a row are possible so... we will see.

Wait for a virtual win line after a line resulting in a complete loss of 1-1-1-2?
Would certainly avoid double/triple line losses, I suppose. Good idea.

You could make an extra rule to only start play after such an event happens as well. (complete loss/virtual win)

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 18, 10:44 AM 2012
Same results but this time instead of rigidly using the third line up as the line to be matched a simple alternation of the 3rd line above then 2nd line above then last line above in rotation is used...

2A1A
3A1A
1A2A - first 3 lines recorded.
2C1C - w2                     +2  match 3rd line up
3A1A - L1,w2                 +3  match 2nd line up
1A2A - L1,w2                 +4  match last line
2C1C - w2                      +6  match 3rd line up
2B3A - L1,L1,L1,w4        +7  match 2nd line up
1B1C - L1,w2                 +8   match last line
2A1C - w2                      +10 match 3rd line up
2C1C - L1,L1,w2             +10 match 2nd line up
2A2Z - w2                      +12 match last line
2A1C - w2                     +14  match 3rd line up
2C1C - w2                     +16  match 2nd line up
2A2Z - w2                      +18 match last line
2B3A - w2                      +20 match 3rd line up
3C2C - L1,L1,w2             +20 match 2nd line up
2A2B - L1,L1,w2            +20 match last line
3B1B - L1,w2                 +21  match 3rd line up
3A2B - L1,w2                 +22 match 2nd line up

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 18, 01:53 PM 2012
Quote from: atlantis on May 18, 10:44 AM 2012
Same results but this time instead of rigidly using the third line up as the line to be matched a simple alternation of the 3rd line above then 2nd line above then last line above in rotation is used...

2A1A
3A1A
1A2A - first 3 lines recorded.
2C1C - w2                     +2  match 3rd line up
3A1A - L1,w2                 +3  match 2nd line up
1A2A - L1,w2                 +4  match last line
2C1C - w2                      +6  match 3rd line up
2B3A - L1,L1,L1,w4        +7  match 2nd line up
1B1C - L1,w2                 +8   match last line
2A1C - w2                      +10 match 3rd line up
2C1C - L1,L1,w2             +10 match 2nd line up
2A2Z - w2                      +12 match last line
2A1C - w2                     +14  match 3rd line up
2C1C - w2                     +16  match 2nd line up
2A2Z - w2                      +18 match last line
2B3A - w2                      +20 match 3rd line up
3C2C - L1,L1,w2             +20 match 2nd line up
2A2B - L1,L1,w2            +20 match last line
3B1B - L1,w2                 +21  match 3rd line up
3A2B - L1,w2                 +22 match 2nd line up

A.
Hi Atlantis, what you guys have to keep in mind is I am not changing my play style in the results I presented or have played since. And the results are STELLAR. I am still playing TWO BY TWO sessions. Heres the thing. Random can rarely deliver three consecutive losing sessions that way. that's RIGHT. I have yet to see 6 consecutive losses that way. Playing continualy you are as always at the mercy of randoms ebb and flow. When the downturn comes and it decides its not giving you a winner for who knows how many lines you will wave goodbye to profitville.

The same play style that has brought me consistent success with CODE 4 will do EXACTLY the same with CODE 4 REVERSE ATTACK. The major difference is my risk to reward. And the pace at which your bankroll will grow. Those are the major benefits. What I propose is a daily outlay/risk of around 40 units. To grow your bankroll at a healthy 20% per calendar day. I have played 40 games in the last two days. When I have 100 it looks like its down to me to author a new thread. And I will because I will state this clearly. It gets no better than this, it really doesn't.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 18, 02:06 PM 2012
Great stuff, John! Sounding really good. :)

How did your 40 games go?  Did you use same play style as CODE 4 (2 game sessions) ?

I, for one, am very interested in your play proposals so we can take best advantage and gain the  benefits. Also your prediction/claims for this are very exciting indeed!

Best wishes,
A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 18, 02:13 PM 2012
Quote from: atlantis on May 18, 02:06 PM 2012
Great stuff, John! Sounding really good. :)

How did your 40 games go?  Did you use same play style as CODE 4 (2 game sessions) ?

I, for one, am very interested in your play proposals so we can take best advantage and gain the  benefits. Also your prediction/claims for this are very exciting indeed!

Best wishes,
A.
Atlantis I've never been more excited about anything in roulette. So long as you break up the play winning is as certain as night follows day. I am 40/0 At present never taken to the 6th step once yet. longest wait for a win the 5th step. Or first game in the third consecutive session. Why I am so excited Atlantis is the RISK TO REWARD. Here now is a method that played two by two. can win your risk in 14 winning games. the normal CODE 4 takes 80 WINNING games to match a loss. that's the difference. But what looks to be the same is THE STRIKERATE. At around 300/1 Are you starting to realize my excitement? ??? ??
Plus you can tailor the staking to suit your pocket like 1,2,3,5,7,10=28 pts risk at a probable strikerate of at least 200/1. Come on....

RANDOM HAS TO DELIVER 6 CONSECUTIVE WINS ON THE FIRST STEP FOR CODE 4 TO TAKE JUST 28 UNITS AWAY FROM ME. Think that over, then over some more. This is more than special.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on May 18, 02:33 PM 2012
:)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 18, 02:36 PM 2012
Quote from: amk on May 18, 02:33 PM 2012
:)
Hello AMK sorry for messing up your thread I am going to author a new one tomorrow then you can clean this one up. What do you think of this unexpected twist in your masterpiece??
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 18, 02:42 PM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 18, 02:13 PM 2012
Atlantis I've never been more excited about anything in roulette. So long as you break up the play winning is as certain as night follows day. I am 40/0 At present never taken to the 6th step once yet. longest wait for a win the 5th step. Or first game in the third consecutive session. Why I am so excited Atlantis is the RISK TO REWARD. Here now is a method that played two by two. can win your risk in 14 winning games. the normal CODE 4 takes 80 WINNING games to match a loss. that's the difference. But what looks to be the same is THE STRIKERATE. At around 300/1 Are you starting to realize my excitement? ??? ??
Plus you can tailor the staking to suit your pocket like 1,2,3,5,7,10=28 pts risk at a probable strikerate of at least 200/1. Come on....

RANDOM HAS TO DELIVER 6 CONSECUTIVE WINS ON THE FIRST STEP FOR CODE 4 TO TAKE JUST 28 UNITS AWAY FROM ME. Think that over, then over some more. This is more than special.

JL,
40/0... So far so very good!
I'm digesting what you've written and am thinking over what you just wrote. You could be playing differently to the way I posted though - I'm not sure. But if correct and true then could be really SPECIAL... I like the idea of the variable staking plan.

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on May 18, 02:55 PM 2012
How could I mind special developments on the CODE 4 thread JL!

It's an honor.

There might even be a next level to this one........

:)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 18, 03:08 PM 2012
Quote from: atlantis on May 18, 02:58 PM 2012
No. Don't think so, TCS...

That would be a code 6 and anyhow think that approach been tried before... Be dangerous to use such a prog like that on one line.

A.
No that's completely wrong. I will outline in specific detail tomorrow the CODE 4 REVERSE ATTACK.. Its looking out of this world even if the strikrate ends up at around 100/1 at 28 units risk and potentially a bank recovered in as little as 7 wins. This is out of this world.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: TwoCatSam on May 18, 03:39 PM 2012
Johnledgend

I shall look forward to that thread!

Sam
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: dino246 on May 18, 04:44 PM 2012
Hi John.
I am also cannot wait to read your next words of Profit-Wisdom.
Have been working on CODE 4 with a system whereby D + C alternate, if continues with 100 % Hit-Rate will post the results to date using LIVE - SPINS only.
All the posts on this forum are so helpfull, informative AND entertaining, many thanks to you all.
Glenn.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 18, 05:47 PM 2012
Quote from: dino246 on May 18, 04:44 PM 2012
Hi John.
I am also cannot wait to read your next words of Profit-Wisdom.
Have been working on CODE 4 with a system whereby D + C alternate, if continues with 100 % Hit-Rate will post the results to date using LIVE - SPINS only.
All the posts on this forum are so helpfull, informative AND entertaining, many thanks to you all.
Glenn.
Live spins is where its at. Forget 100% thats unrealistic. I aim for a minumum of double return on my risk per game. If thats 80 units I expect at least 160 back for it to be worth my time. Im up there right now because CODE 4 REVERSE ATTACK. Will be at the very least 5 times the risk in return. And could be as high as 20 times the risk in return. And thats a dream come true. I believe itll fall somewhere in between on average. I will start a new thread soon.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on May 19, 12:09 AM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 18, 02:13 PM 2012
Atlantis I've never been more excited about anything in roulette. So long as you break up the play winning is as certain as night follows day. I am 40/0 At present never taken to the 6th step once yet. longest wait for a win the 5th step. Or first game in the third consecutive session. Why I am so excited Atlantis is the RISK TO REWARD. Here now is a method that played two by two. can win your risk in 14 winning games. the normal CODE 4 takes 80 WINNING games to match a loss. that's the difference. But what looks to be the same is THE STRIKERATE. At around 300/1 Are you starting to realize my excitement? ??? ??
Plus you can tailor the staking to suit your pocket like 1,2,3,5,7,10=28 pts risk at a probable strikerate of at least 200/1. Come on....

RANDOM HAS TO DELIVER 6 CONSECUTIVE WINS ON THE FIRST STEP FOR CODE 4 TO TAKE JUST 28 UNITS AWAY FROM ME. Think that over, then over some more. This is more than special.

Hello JL

I assume that you bet 6 steps like in Code 4 but for repeat of a dozen in DCDC sequence.
1,2,3,5,7,10 and 2x2 games a session?

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: justanothergambler on May 19, 01:20 AM 2012
deleted my post due to long wait from moderator approval .. I dnt understand why always have to approve the posts.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: intrinseco on May 19, 05:22 AM 2012
Code 4 played for 1 millions spins. 1 game played every 37 spins

-7665 units after 1 millions spins is nothing....but it's still negative...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 19, 05:36 AM 2012
Intrin, is that continuous play?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: intrinseco on May 19, 06:52 AM 2012
No , It's one game every 37 spins , in total around 27.000 games were played
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: thepilot on May 19, 08:57 AM 2012
Please find after the numbers i took myself yesterday night on a real french roulette table in Enghien, near Paris France. I stood for 4 hours. I can guarantee they are 100 % exact. (even there was no zero !)
Why not using them to make all the demo you need ? Like this, every contributor will have the same basis to prove the quality of his research.
Anyway, congrats for all your hardwork.

B3A3
B1A2
A1B1
C2C2
C1B1
C3B2
B3B3
B1C2
A1A3
C1C3
B1B3
A3A3
C1B3
B2A2
B3C2
B1B1
A1C2
B2A2
C2B3
B3C1
A3A3
A3A2
A1C1
B2A3
C1C1
A2A1
A1C1
A2A1
C2B3
B1C2
B2B3
C3A2
A2B1
B1B1
B3C1
C1C2
A3B3
C1A1
C3B2
B2B2
B1C3
A1A1
C3B3
C1B1
A1C3
A2B3
A1A1
B1A3
B1A2
C2A3
A1C1
B1C2
C2B3
C2C1
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: TwoCatSam on May 19, 09:47 AM 2012
Pilot

Thanks for that hard work.  I assure you--when the system is posted---I will use your numbers.

Sam
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: roulettefan on May 19, 11:15 AM 2012
congratulation intrinseco for your hard work

hello from monte carlo (south of france )
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: justanothergambler on May 19, 12:05 PM 2012
Bayes,
I would like to thank him but I still need admin permission for posting...

the graph of intrinseco are great BUT as I see they are not applicable. who would play once in 37 spins!? I dnt know why he didnt make a graph for continuous play.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on May 19, 03:33 PM 2012
Hello  Bayes,

With all due respect we should give JohnLegend credit for his great playing and sharing of his results. I know you don't like hit and run philosophy but it clearly has been working for JL, I certainly wouldn't mind having 6400 units. If I would ever drop down to 3500 I would stop playing CODE 4 but that would be fine by my to :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 19, 04:00 PM 2012
Quote from: Bayes on May 19, 10:58 AM 2012
Funny how intrinseco doesn't get any thanks for HIS hard work.  ;D

Not having a go at you Sam, it's just that no-one likes a "negative" message, especially when it happens to be true!

I expect JL will be along soon to dismiss intrinseco's coding efforts as somehow invalid.  ::)

I wish he would tell us what the missing ingredient is in his infallible systems, because to date no-one has been able to replicate his results...  :'(
Bayes I have been telling you until I am blue in the face. No ones listening that's the problem. So someone codes CODE 4 and it delivers negative results. We are going over old ground here. He played a game every 37 spins. He may as well have played continously. Because that is too rigid. The whole point about Hit and run is to enter the cycle RANDOMLY. So as to not allow randoms ebbs and flow to fully affect your outcomes.

I told you and others time and time again. If you want similar results to me YOU PLAY EXACTLY LIKE ME. There is no other way. Until that's digested and carried out to the letter don't come on here whinging Its all lies because JL achieves this and that. And no one else does. I have yet to hear of anyone sticking to the plan PROPERLY. Therein lies the problem.

Don't bastardize my play style then expect stellar results. Hit and Run works today, tomorrow for alltime. IF, you are true to it as I play it. We have long known that static testing fails all methods. But it doesn't mean the method isnt profitable when applied in a certain way. I am not the only one on here who has achieved success either keep that in mind. But I have attained great CONSISTENCY. Simply because I do not stray from the path.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 19, 04:28 PM 2012
Quote from: Bayes on May 19, 11:46 AM 2012
Isn't 1 million spins enough?  :-\

I like JL's enthusiasm too, but the truth is more important, in my opinion.
The truth is more important. So you think I make these figures up??? If I were making this all up wouldnt I make it sound a lot better? Knowing what the average Joe expects to be impressed with a method. Why don't I just say CODE 4 gives me a strikerate of 1,000/1 or Pattern breaker 30/1? Hell if I am this pied piper leading newbies to financial doom as you insist. Why not make all the methods I play sound so incredible and life changing that they cannot resist and pawn their grandmothers earrings to get the bankroll to play them.

I am telling it as it happens. I don't have to make anything up Bayes. If something doesn't pan out. doesn't hold up I will be the FIRST to tell you. I have played three methods consistently in recent times but tried many others. I only hold on to and endorse those that deliver. I am not precious, remember aside from Pattern Breaker none of these methods were originated by me. I have nothing to gain from pushing other peoples methods, has that ever crossed your mind???

The new twist on CODE 4 is not mine. But I knew as soon as I saw it. ITS GOING TO WORK. And boy is it working. I am finalizing the ground rules and will give full credit to Wolfat and Atlantis for their hard work and astute observations in getting me there. But I will repeat this as I surely have to. PLAY EXACTLY AS I PLAY. And then see if you don't turn a profit. Until then you have no business calling me on anything. Static testing never works. It only satisfies maths heads who need explantations for everything. But random doesn't care about maths. It swings and roundabouts regardless of all the simulations and coding. You will always fail a method with it. But the method if its any good will turn a profit played Hit and Run in a disciplined manner.

So now I'm in the process of laying down guidelines for a method that is looking to have a return somewhere in the region of 10 times the risk on the table. No doubt somebody will code it and it won't work then they will say Jls at it again.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 19, 05:10 PM 2012
Quote from: TwoCatSam on May 19, 04:55 PM 2012
I'll make you good ol' boys an offer.  And it won't cost..............

If Dr. John will post this method, I will test it a Dublin with fun money--which is all I can do, being Red, White and Blue!  I'll make movies and post them on YouTube.  I'll do a thousand spins--will keep me out of trouble--100 at a time.

I know-----I really do-----that 1,000 spins is like a mosquito fart in an F-5 tornado, but that will have to do. 

If 100 spins per trot does not fit the rules, I will follow the rules instead.
Ding Dong!!  Am I a nice guy or what??

TCS


(Ow!  Ow!  My arm!!)



The method comes to town Monday night. don't worry about 100 spins or 1 million. Just worry about playing it exactly as I tell you. And overtime you won't need proof of anything no one will. Your bankroll will tell you I am not bulshitting. Tonight someone PMed me and told me of their success playing the three methods I play. I told them  to come on here and tell you guys. because I've had a few people over the months PMing me but not letting you guys know anything. So then the likes of Bayes, Garnbabby, Superman and Robeenhuut. Think I am the only player who shows positive numbers with any of the methods I play. Which simply isnt the case.

I know of three players on here who have been successful and many more in my life. They simply are not spreading the word. So I appear to be the only person having success with OTHER PEOPLES METHODS. What a world we live in, what a world...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 19, 05:45 PM 2012
Quote from: StackBundles on May 19, 05:42 PM 2012
i don't understand why there has to be a big write up about this method its betting the same instead of opposite why would it take till monday to write it?
Stacks its not the same at all. And with how easily people on these boards get confused I have to write it and deliver it in a precise and easily digestable package. Please be patient. I assure you its worth the wait. Its turnover in relation to risk is very special.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on May 19, 05:51 PM 2012
Well, it should be clear to all who have been paying attention........

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Chauncy47 on May 19, 06:51 PM 2012
Hi everyone, I have been a silent observer on this forum for a while and wanted to add some comments based on my results  I pm'd Johnlegend to thank him for sharing his methods and ideas with us.  I am from the USA and have played Code 4, Pattern Breaker and Divde & Conquer and have increased my bankroll up to $2655 over the past couple of months.  I play exactly as Johnlegend plays and it has worked extremely well.  I can only play at B&M Casino and ofcourse have the 2 green goblins to contend with but the results are solid and oh, plus my min table bets are $5 so my progressions can increase quickly but I have never lost confidence in any of these systems as they are all rock solid.  For all of those out there who doubt the methods... I would encourage you to try and stick to his playing rules as tight as possible and I would say that discipline is #1, atleast for me.  For me, it is all about the disclpline and the rules of the game ... I never look at the games results anymore in days, but ralther weeks and months now.   I know this much, it is enjoyable to watch randomness chase itself aroud in any of these methods as oppose to me chasing it.  To simply ask randomness to duplicate what it did or did not do at that very pricise moment in time when you begin to play....most of the time it simply can't duplicate it .... and when it does, I am thrilled, because I say to Mr. Randomness .... nice round, now show me that you can do it again. Hit, Run and Rondomness its the perfect winner.  I want to openly thank Johnlegend, AMK, Twister and if I forgot anyone, I will circle back and thank them again in another post for sharing their thoughts and ideas with the rest of us.  I get that its not for everybody, especially the math guys, but for those of you that are open minded enough to explore the possibilities, these methods work.  I will post my results for you to see tomorrow sometime as I have tracked them from the beginning.   I can't wait to see what JL has to offer on Reverse Code 4 Attack.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: thepilot on May 20, 03:42 AM 2012
Hi guys,
As i am 62 and played roulette almost everyday since 40 years, i would like to say that those who are not interested in JohnLegend work stay away and work on their own strategies.
I have an incredible collection of systems and methods from the 19th and 20 th century. For instant i haven't see such an interesting approach as the JL one's.
I like and share his optimism. I will quietly wait his new development...
Best of luck for those playing today (in real casinos !)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 20, 09:28 AM 2012
Quote from: thepilot on May 20, 03:42 AM 2012
Hi guys,
As i am 62 and played roulette almost everyday since 40 years, i would like to say that those who are not interested in JohnLegend work stay away and work on their own strategies.
I have an incredible collection of systems and methods from the 19th and 20 the century. For instant i haven't see such an interesting approach as the JL one's.
I like and share his optimism. I will quietly wait his new development...
Best of luck for those playing today (in real casinos !)
Thankyou for your kind words Pilot. I must be the baby here I am 47.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 20, 09:33 AM 2012
Quote from: vundarosa on May 20, 08:50 AM 2012

--------------------

Robeen, I think what JL is proposing is betting the first step of the code4 only for 6 consecutive lines maximum and 28u risk (1,2,3,5,7,10). So the formation is  DCDC (dozen Column)

DCDC
DCDC
DCDC
DCDC
DCDC
DCDC
DCDC

You'd be betting the each underlined D to match the previous underlined D of the same colour in 6 attempts. At each win you'd restart from 1u. You'd Hit for 2u profit and run to come back later and attempt another 2u profit

I've looked at some past C4 sections...i cannot share JLs enthusiasm. He must have some other trick up his sleeve.

vundarosa
No thats not it Vundarosa. You will get it tomorrow the thing is you wont always be hitting for 2 units steps 2 to 5 of the progression deliver 3,3,4,3 units return on a win. Therein lies the gift of this new twist. Recovery is so much faster than the normal CODE 4 which takes 80 wins to recover a bank. This will average 10 wins to recover a bank. That alone makes this version an attractive proposition to all but the negatives.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 20, 09:57 AM 2012
Quote from: amk on May 19, 05:51 PM 2012
Well, it should be clear to all who have been paying attention........
Yes AMK attention is the word. I am trying to bring a bankroll friendly version of your masterpiece to the masses. Theres no excuses with this one. 28 unit buy in and an average of 10 wins to recover a losing progression. And a strikrate that looks like it could approach three figures. Without CODE 4 there could be no CODE 4 REVERSE ATTACK. I thank you again for your gift. I will always play the original CODE 4 along with PATTERN BREAKER (which has an update due soon) and DIVIDE AND CONQUER.

If this one doesn't capture the imagination of the positive members on this forum. I don't think anything can. I've seen many methods in my time. This once is very natural to the order of things. And relatively bankroll friendly. Speak soon regards JL...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 20, 10:03 AM 2012
Hi John,
Looking forward to tomorrow night's big reveal :)

Atlantis.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 20, 10:34 AM 2012
The Sunday Code4 Quiz (JUST FOR FUN folks!)
===============
I have used thepilots's results which he kindly posted for testing purposes earlier in the thread for this CODE4 variation...

B3A3
B1A2
A1B1
C2C2 - w2
C1B1
C3B2 
B3B3 - w2
B1C2
A1A3 - L1
C1C3 - L2
B1B3 - L3
A3A3 - w10
C1B3
B2A2
B3C2
B1B1 - w2
A1C2
B2A2
C2B3
B3C1
A3A3 - w2
A3A2 - L1
A1C1
B2A3
C1C1 - w4
A2A1 - L1
A1C1 - L2
A2A1 - L3
C2B3
B1C2
B2B3 - L5
C3A2
A2B1
B1B1 - w14
B3C1
C1C2 - L1
A3B3
C1A1
C3B2
B2B2 - w4
B1C3
A1A1 - w2
C3B3
C1B1
A1C3
A2B3
A1A1 - w2
B1A3
B1A2
C2A3
A1C1
B1C2
C2B3
C2C1 - L1

won=44
lost=22
Profit=+22
=======

QUESTION: How and with what betting criteria was Atlantis able to make the 22pts profit??

:)

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 20, 11:14 AM 2012
Well I don't know if this is something like John had in mind but here goes:
(using "thepilot's" recorded results and JL's suggested prog.)

B3A3 - L1 w4
B1A2 - L1 L2
A1B1 - L3 w10
C2C2 - w2 w2
C1B1 - L1 w4
C3B2 - L1 L2
B3B3 - w6 w2
B1C2 - L1 L2
A1A3 - w6 L1
C1C3 - w4 L1
B1B3 - w4 L1
A3A3 - w4 w2
C1B3 - L1 L2
B2A2 - L3 w10
B3C2 - L1 L2
B1B1 - w6 w2
A1C2 - L1 L2
B2A2 - L3 w10
C2B3 - L1 L2
B3C1 - L3 L5
A3A3 - w14 w2
A3A2 - w2 L1
A1C1 - L2 w6
B2A3 - L1 L2
C1C1 - w6 w2
A2A1 - w2 L1
A1C1 - L2 w6
A2A1 - w2 L1
C2B3 - L2 L3
B1C2 - L5 L7
B2B3 - w20 L1
C3A2 - L1 L2
A2B1 - L3 L5
B1B1 - W14 w2
B3C1 - L1 L2
C1C2 - w6 L1
A3B3 - L2 w6
C1A1 - L1 w4
C3B2 - L1 L2
B2B2 - w6 L1
B1C3 - L2 L3
A1A1 - w10 w2
C3B3 - L1 w4
C1B1 - L1 w4
A1C3 - L1 L2
A2B3 - L3 L5
A1A1 - w14 w2
B1A3 - L1 L2
B1A2 - L3 L5
C2A3 - L7 L10 *1 lost progression (1-2-3-5-7-10)
A1C1 - L1 w4
B1C2 - L1 L2
C2B3 - L3 L5
C2C1 - w14 L1

won=230
lost=149
Profit=+81 (amended due to error)
==========

:) Can you figure it out??

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 20, 12:35 PM 2012
Hi Warrior,  :)
Almost right! I am not using vertical matches at all. I am simply betting that that the last 2 elements (couplet) of a code 4 horizontal line will be a REPEAT or MATCH of the first two elements of that line.

eg:

If line starts 3b I bet using progression+restart for 3b to repeat.

eg:

3b3c - w2 L1
2a3a - L2 w6

and that is it.

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: warrior on May 20, 12:36 PM 2012
Quote from: atlantis on May 20, 12:35 PM 2012
Hi Warrior,  :)
Almost right! I am not using vertical matches at all. I am simply betting that that the last 2 elements (couplet) of a code 4 horizontal line will be a REPEAT or MATCH of the first two elements of that line.

e.g.:

If line starts 3b I bet using progression+restart for 3b to repeat.

e.g.:

3b3c - w2 L1
2a3a - L2 w4

and that is it.

A.
Yes i saw that, that's what i meant,GOOD JOB :thumbsup:
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: dino246 on May 20, 12:38 PM 2012
Hi again Atlantis ! Is the following correct ?
3B1B  LI  W4          CUM TOTAL =  + 3
2C3A  LI  L2                                       EVEN
1C1B  W6  L1                                       + 5
3C2B  L2  L3                                       EVEN
1C2C  L5  W14                                      + 9     etc.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 20, 12:40 PM 2012
Quote from: dino246 on May 20, 12:38 PM 2012
Hi again Atlantis ! Is the following correct ?
3B1B  LI  W4          CUM TOTAL =  + 3
2C3A  LI  L2                                       EVEN
1C1B  W6  L1                                       + 5
3C2B  L2  L3                                       EVEN
1C2C  L5  W14                                      + 9     etc.

Yes. It's that easy. Looks spot on to me!

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 20, 01:18 PM 2012
Quote from: dino246 on May 20, 12:38 PM 2012
Hi again Atlantis ! Is the following correct ?
3B1B  LI  W4                 CUM TOTAL =  + 3
2C3A  LI  L2                                       EVEN
1C1B  W6  L1                                       + 5
3C2B  L2  L3                                       EVEN
1C2C  L5  W14                                      + 9     etc.

One thing you **could** do:

Quote
3B1B  LI  W4                 CUM TOTAL =  + 3
2C3A  LI  L2                                       EVEN
1C1B  W6  L1                                       + 5   **because ahead here could restart progression...
3C2B  L1  L2                                         +2
1C2C  L3  W10                                      +9     etc.

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 20, 02:01 PM 2012
Quick example game.
These numbers from SLC low-limit auto-roulette just now:

13,29,20,19,20,34,5,18,9,5,27,0,3,19,2

2b2a - w2 L1            +1 (reset)
2c1c - L1 w4             +4
1b30 - L1 L2             +1
1a1x - w6  x             +7 **STOP END OF SESSION
x=no bet

========

Hit - n - Run

A.     
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: biagle on May 20, 02:04 PM 2012
hi, atlantis
i just got this on smart live:

3b3a w1 l1
1a3b l2 l3
102a i skipped this
3a2b l5 l7
3a2  l10
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: dino246 on May 20, 02:10 PM 2012
I know some players don"t like to cover ZERO as an INSURANCE bet,but as there is a bet EVERY spin,...... i think i will !!
This COVER always pays for me.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 20, 02:14 PM 2012
Quote from: biagle on May 20, 02:04 PM 2012
hi, atlantis
i just got this on smart live:

3b3a w1 l1
1a3b l2 l3
102a i skipped this
3a2b l5 l7
3a2  l10

Ok. I'm not sure yet how to handle the 0 situations.
I think would have played it like this...

3b3a w2 L1                +1 (reset)
1a3b L1, L2                -2
102a skipped
3a2b L3, L5                -10
3a2   L7                     -17

You need a win on the last element of the last line to be +4 or else you're unfortunately down -27 (losing progression 28 minus 1 unit)

Remember this a made up fun system and I don't know how will pan out... Thanks for showing what CAN and no doubt WILL happen.

Thanks,
A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: dino246 on May 20, 02:21 PM 2012
With the ZERO it might be an idea to A ( reset and take the LOSS ) or B ( COVER ZERO and take the WIN as i would betting £5 a chip LIVE-ONLY.)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on May 20, 02:56 PM 2012
Hello Atlantis

Quick testing on SML live spins. Around 500 spins. 71 wins and 5 loses. 3 loses in around 50 last spins. 2 back to back loses - it hit on 13 step.

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 20, 03:00 PM 2012
Quote from: dino246 on May 20, 02:21 PM 2012
With the ZERO it might be an idea to A ( reset and take the LOSS ) or B ( COVER ZERO and take the WIN as i would betting £5 a chip LIVE-ONLY.)

Hi dino,
Yes those are possibilities... I will leave this now as do not want to detract from the original thread. I just tried to invent something that would appear to fit in with JL's comments about the upcoming REVERSE CODE 4 ATTACK - but maybe it is similar or not - I don't know...
I will now wait to see John's reveal on Mon. night.
Hope you all enjoyed the Sunday Fun + code 4 variation (s)

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 20, 03:04 PM 2012
Quote from: Robeenhuut on May 20, 02:56 PM 2012
Hello Atlantis

Quick testing on SML live spins. Around 500 spins. 71 wins and 5 loses. 3 loses in around 50 last spins. 2 back to back loses - it hit on 13 step.

Regards

Hi Robeenhuut,

Hmm.. Doesn't sound very promising then..

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on May 20, 03:10 PM 2012
Quote from: atlantis on May 20, 03:04 PM 2012
Hi Robeenhuut,

Hmm.. Doesn't sound very promising then..

A.

You are still ahead but who knows what would happens in next 500 spins. But its nice idea.
And you need to cover 0 in my opinion.

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 20, 05:12 PM 2012
Quote from: Robeenhuut on May 20, 03:10 PM 2012
You are still ahead but who knows what would happens in next 500 spins. But its nice idea.
And you need to cover 0 in my opinion.

Regards
Interesting stuff guys. Ill just say the strikerate will seriously improve IF you play what I have in mind. It will once and for all prove HIT AND RUNS value.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 20, 06:02 PM 2012
Looking forward to reading your detailed and concise new thread for this. I'm still not 100% grasping how this works so looking forward to getting to know it better with your info John.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 20, 06:13 PM 2012
Quote from: subby on May 20, 06:02 PM 2012
Looking forward to reading your detailed and concise new thread for this. I'm still not 100% grasping how this works so looking forward to getting to know it better with your info John.
Okay Subby any questions once ive posted it feel free to ask...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: iggiv on May 20, 09:03 PM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 20, 05:12 PM 2012
Interesting stuff guys. Ill just say the strikerate will seriously improve IF you play what I have in mind. It will once and for all prove HIT AND RUNS value.

yes, hit-run is a way to go
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on May 20, 10:16 PM 2012
Quote from: atlantis on May 20, 03:04 PM 2012
Hi Robeenhuut,

Hmm.. Doesn't sound very promising then..

A.

Another 220 spins from SML live wheel. 26W and 3L. In first 3 games 2L. I think that your initial approach betting vertically with 1,1,1,2 was better idea. 

Regards 
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bettor 27 on May 21, 06:19 AM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 19, 04:28 PM 2012
...But I will repeat this as I surely have to. PLAY EXACTLY AS I PLAY. And then see if you don't turn a profit. Until then you have no business calling me on anything. Static testing never works. It only satisfies maths heads who need explantations for everything. But random doesn't care about maths. It swings and roundabouts regardless of all the simulations and coding. You will always fail a method with it. But the method if its any good will turn a profit played Hit and Run in a disciplined manner.

Hi JL,

Can you qualify what "PLAY EXACTLY AS I PLAY" means?

We know you play 2 games X 5 times a day (10 units total)

But can you provide visibility on how your day is structured, what your typical day looks like and how these games are played - for example:

07.15h - 2 games via internet casino
11.00h - 2 games at B & M casino
14.25h - 2 games at B & M casino
17.30h - 2 games at B & M casino
22.00h - 2 games via internet casino

Thanks for your posts

B27
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 21, 02:42 PM 2012
Quote from: Bettor 27 on May 21, 06:19 AM 2012
Hi JL,

Can you qualify what "PLAY EXACTLY AS I PLAY" means?

We know you play 2 games X 5 times a day (10 units total)

But can you provide visibility on how your day is structured, what your typical day looks like and how these games are played - for example:

07.15h - 2 games via internet casino
11.00h - 2 games at B & M casino
14.25h - 2 games at B & M casino
17.30h - 2 games at B & M casino
22.00h - 2 games via internet casino

Thanks for your posts

B27
Bettor 27 always a pleasure. It means really what it says. If I advise you to play 2 by 2. Then play 2 by 2. 4 by 4 then do so. And so forth. Then you should get results close to mine IF you stick with it long enough. What annoys me is when people start playing their version of a method. And detractors then jump on me when they report not so impressive results. Well YES they aren't playing what I advised so I cannot be responsible for the outcome.

That said you can bet your life some people will report negative results no matter what. They don't want anything to really take off for obvious reasons. What I do know, is the neutral members on this board who have no agenda are the ones I trust the most. And they PM me with a true picture of their experience with the methods. And some of them are doing better than me.

They are the ones I want to help the most anyhow. They are open books and they truly want to learn how to best this game longterm. And they will. As I said before you either have the right mindset or you don't. And unfortunately that means just because you are a member of a roulette forum. It doesn't mean you have what it takes to beat this game.

If you came in with the wrong baggage. And a defeatest attitude forget it. Its never going to happen. You will side with the negatives and bash everyone who even mentions the word WIN.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bettor 27 on May 22, 05:11 AM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 21, 02:42 PM 2012
Bettor 27 always a pleasure. It means really what it says. If I advise you to play 2 by 2. Then play 2 by 2...

Thanks JL - can you also clarify how these 10 games are spaced out?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: dino246 on May 22, 08:04 AM 2012
Hi Atlantis.
Your CODE 4 VARIATION is holding up very well.
No losing games to date.
Covering Zero on EVERY bet.
Back-Testing LIVE-SPINS only.
Awsome HIT+RUN system.
Does this concept deserve its own thread ?
Many Thanks for making me money in advance !!
Anyone curious about all the above GO TO reply 768 of this thread.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 22, 08:41 AM 2012
Quote from: dino246 on May 22, 08:04 AM 2012
Hi Atlantis.
Your CODE 4 VARIATION is holding up very well.
No losing games to date.
Covering Zero on EVERY bet.
Back-Testing LIVE-SPINS only.
Awsome HIT+RUN system.
Does this concept deserve its own thread ?
Many Thanks for making me money in advance !!
Anyone curious about all the above GO TO reply 768 of this thread.

Hi dino,
This is great news that it is holding up. In a way it is *similar* to JL's new attack (same progression)
Thanks for the info. I'm pleased to hear it is still doing well. Keep us informed of your progress.
A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 22, 08:43 AM 2012
Quote from: Robeenhuut on May 20, 10:16 PM 2012
Another 220 spins from SML live wheel. 26W and 3L. In first 3 games 2L. I think that your initial approach betting vertically with 1,1,1,2 was better idea. 
Regards 

Hi Robeenhuut,
I still like the 1-1-1-2 per line approach as well. Haven't given up on it yet. Maybe with some tweaks...?

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 22, 11:21 AM 2012
Quote from: dino246 on May 22, 08:04 AM 2012
Hi Atlantis.
Your CODE 4 VARIATION is holding up very well.
No losing games to date.
Covering Zero on EVERY bet.
Back-Testing LIVE-SPINS only.
Awsome HIT+RUN system.
Does this concept deserve its own thread ?
Many Thanks for making me money in advance !!
Anyone curious about all the above GO TO reply 768 of this thread.

Hi Dino, Robeenhuut

Safer version below of CODE4Variation??
Bet that the second 2 elements of a code 4 horizontal line MATCH the first 2 elements recorded...

For instance:
B3 is first 2 results recorded on line - bet for B3 to repeat

For instance:
2C is first 2 results recorded on line - bet for 2C to repeat

Instead of 1-2-3-5-7-10 (28u) progression as before, rotate the 1-1-1-2 (5u) progression.

If lose the progression restart the progression.
Also, restart the progression after ANY WIN gained on a line.
I use "thepilot's" real casino numbers again for test:

B3A3 - L1 w2       +1
B1A2 - L1 L1        -1
A1B1 - L1 w4       +2
C2C2 - w2 w2       +6
C1B1 - L1 w2       +7
C3B2 - L1 L1        +5
B3B3 - w2 w2        +9
B1C2 - L1 L1         +7
A1A3 - w2 L1         +8
C1C3 - w2 L1         +9
B1B3 - w2 L1         +10
A3A3 - w2 w2        +14
C1B3 - L1 L1          +12
B2A2 - L1 w4         +15
B3C2 - L1 L1          +13
B1B1 - w2 w2         +15
A1C2 - L1 L1          +13
B2A2 - L1 w4          +16
C2B3 - L1 L1          +14
B3C1 - L1 L2           +11 *restart prog 1-1-1-2
A3A3 - w2 w2          +15
A3A2 - w2 L1           +16
A1C1 - L1 w2           +17
B2A3 - L1 L1            +15
C1C1 - w2 w2           +19
A2A1 - w2 L1           +20
A1C1 - L1 w2           +21
A2A1 - w2 L1           +22
C2B3 - L1 L1            +20
B1C2 - L1 L2            +17 *restart prog 1-1-1-2
B2B3 - w2 L1           +18
C3A2 - L1 L1            +16
A2B1 - L1 L2            +13
B1B1 - w2 w2           +17
B3C1 - L1 L1            +15
C1C2 - w2 L1            +16
A3B3 - L1 w2            +17
C1A1 - L1 w2            +18
C3B2 - L1 L1             +16
B2B2 - w2 L1            +17
B1C3 - L1 L1             +15
A1A1 - w2 w2            +19
C3B3 - L1 w2             +20
C1B1 - L1 w2             +21
A1C3 - L1 L1              +19
A2B3 - L1 L2              +16
A1A1 - w2 w2             +20
B1A3 - L1 L1              +18
B1A2 - L1 L2              +15 *restart prog 1-1-1-2
C2A3 - L1 L1              +13
A1C1 - L1 w2              +14
B1C2 - L1 L1              +12
C2B3 - L1 L2               +9 *restart prog 1-1-1-2
C2C1 - w2 L1               +10

Highest bet = 2u

Quit when ahead. Use random entry and hit-n-run for better results?

What u think Dino, Robeenhuut?

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: unre4lbg on May 22, 03:54 PM 2012
Im now playing CODE 4 like this:

Waiting for a match in the forth matrix with the first and then bet 1-1/3-3/9-9 (thinking of covering the zero ot the last step) 3 sessions for 2 units. Starting with a bankroll of 120 units. :)

And in the meanwhile CODE 4 originally played has never met a lost in my 120 games records. I think im playing just AS JohnLegend said - HIT and RUN (making 2-3-4 hours brakes between sessions) 8 games,+ or - im out, in those 8 games usually there is a match in the first so i can place a bet.

Thanks for the great method!! I just HOPE when i loose sooner or later, i can manage to recover for a couple  of days , not being in  a circle of losses when my BR will be eaten.. after all im a poor student lol :wink:
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 22, 04:07 PM 2012
Quote from: unre4lbg on May 22, 03:54 PM 2012
I'm now playing CODE 4 like this:

Waiting for a match in the forth matrix with the first and then bet 1-1/3-3/9-9 (thinking of covering the zero ot the last step) 3 sessions for 2 units. Starting with a bankroll of 120 units. :)

And in the meanwhile CODE 4 originally played has never met a lost in my 120 games records. I think I'm playing just AS JohnLegend said - HIT and RUN (making 2-3-4 hours brakes between sessions) 8 games,+ or - I'm out, in those 8 games usually there is a match in the first so i can place a bet.

Thanks for the great method!! I just HOPE when i lose sooner or later, i can manage to recover for a couple  of days , not being in  a circle of losses when my BR will be eaten.. after all I'm a poor student LoL :wink:

Hi unre4lbg,
That seems very sensible way to play.
Great result, btw!
Thanks for posting your results and good luck.

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 23, 03:27 AM 2012
Quote from: Deejay on May 22, 04:53 PM 2012
Hi Guys

I'm new to this but lost on one thing (due to my lack of experience in gambling!) - the bet progressions. Maybe i am misunderstanding.

Today i tried Code 4 - in a real Casino, with live wheels. I picked a random game and entered, and counted back about 10 numbers and recorded them. I then waited for the next 2 numbers to come in without betting anything so i had my 12, and my 3 sequences.

I then bet against my first sequence, so say it was 1A3C, i put £5 (1 unit - 5?) on dozens 2 and 3. That did not come in so i then bet columns B and C with 15 (1-1, 3-3, 9-9?) which came in, making me 5.

I would then switch to another table and do the same, sometimes getting through to the 3rd bet before winning back my 5.

Sound right? Sorry for my noobness  :ooh: :(

For straight up code 4 (normal code 4) you go back 12 spins


13 is in the 2 dozen
7 is in the a column etc...
1
b
3
c
3
a
1
a
1
c

this set of dozens and columns gives you the matrix like so...

2* a** 1*** b****
3c3a
1a1c

For normal code 4 you then bet a sequence of

1-1 on dozens one and three (you're playing against 2*) - If it wins then you're +1 if not go to
3-3 on cols b and c (You're playing against a**)- If it wins then you're +1 if not go to
9-9 on dozens two and three (You're playing against 1***)- If it wins then you're +1 if not go to
27-27 (I personally at this point play 29-29 with 2 units on zero) on cols a and c (You're playing against b***)- If it wins then you're +1 if not stop as your game is over with -81 units

You can of course play just the 3 step progression to lose 26 units but I play the 4th betting step 29-29 and 2 on zero.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: intrinseco on May 23, 06:41 AM 2012
Hi everybody, At first I would like to say that I didn't code "code 4" with the intention to be negative or denigrate any user or method. I just did it to give my  contribute to the forum showing the possible behavior of the system in a long term. I'm not against some users or any ideas. After my post I read some comments talking about the  way I played it every 37 spins was not a proper random. So to be fair I decided to run again the same 1 million spins but instead play a game very 37 spins, I'm playing a game every x spins,

where x =
171,42,85,41,195,134,88,82,44,115,159,137,141,37,177,148,141,22,119,56,190,85,58,35,193,183,95,18,156,93,127,105,103,26,59,109,174,66,65,95 ,30  ,174   ,24   ,118 ,36  ,109  ,197   ,48    ,167    ,76     ,84     ,183    ,183    ,135    ,60     ,149    ,182    ,175    ,112    ,38      ,148     ,185     ,27      ,196     ,143     ,39       ,109      ,158      ,50       ,45       ,66       ,159      ,115      ,45       ,52       ,156      ,29       ,28


(numbers downloaded from :.random.org (link:://:.random.org))

As we can see in the chart the result in the long term are pretty much the same but i noticed a difference, there are more positives waves, so I did a third run, the third chart shows us a zoom of the first 20.000 spins, 190 games without a loss, and 192 games with 1 loss. This situations happens very often playing this way and it is the reason because different users are having different results. Some of them are catching the positive wave from the begining and others from a middle point

With this I'm not pretending to say that code 4 doesn't work at all, I just thing we need more improvements and some of them could be done studing my charts and following others  opinions.

PS: To john leggend: If you send me exactly the way you play your hit and run, I can exactly put it in the code, I mean, for example:
day 1: first game 10:00
           second game  13:45
etc etc
day 2: first game: 11:36
etc etc

I can code 30 days with different hours per every day.

And also if some one has a txt file with real millions spins, that will be nice to see if there is some difference

Thanks


Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 23, 07:58 AM 2012
I enjoy reading your stats fella :) Keep up the good work
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: atlantis on May 23, 02:06 PM 2012
Remember the CODE 4 SLIDE??

Quote
This is one of the better progressions for double dozen betting, thanks to GLC and others.
Double Dozen Progression
Progression Level
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Bet level 1 ($1.00) on each Dozen for 5 Spins
If at the end each 5 spins we have a positive balance then spin another 5 times at level 1 ($1.00).
For example, if we won all 5 times we would have a positive balance of $5, if we won 4 times we would have a positive balance of $2 therefore we would spin another 5 times at level 1 ($1.00).
If at end of 5 spins we have a negative balance then increase bets to next progression level 2 ($2.00) for next 5 spins.

For example, if we won 3 times out of 5, we would have a negative balance of -$1.
Bet level 2 ($2.00) on each Dozen for 5 spins.
If during these 5 spins we have eliminated the negative balance of -$1 then revert back to next lower level, ie level 1.
If we still have a negative balance at the end of level 2, then go to level 3.
For example, we have a -$1 loss from level 1.
The first spin at level 2 ($2.00) on each dozen is won, we win $2.00 which when added to the -$1 loss from the previous level a +$1 which has eliminated the negative balance and we now revert back 1 level.

Applied to the CODE 4 SLIDE

To get faster bets here is example game played in code 4 alternate fashion playing AGAINST the formation of left and right diagonal symmetrical quads:

2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c - first 12 results [From Now On Only Bet Column 1 and Column 4 when applicable)
b 2 a 2 - w+1 @ col1 (not a-a-c-c) ; w+1 @ col4 (not 2-2-1-1)
3 b 3 a - w+1 @ col1 (not 2-1-2-1) ; w+1 @ col4 (not a-c-a-c)
a 2 c 3 - no bet @ col1 ; L-2 @ col4 (not 2-2-3-3)  5 bets @ 1-1 the Balance =+2. Stay at 1-1
3 c 2 b - L-2 @ col1 (not 2-3-2-3) ; w+1 @ col4 (not b-b-c-c)
c 1 c 2 - w+1 @ col1 (not a-c-c-a) ; w+1 @ col4 (not 3-2-2-3)
3 b 3 a - no bet @ col1 ; L-2 @ col4 (not a-c-c-a)  5 bets @ 1-1 the Balance = +1.  Up to 2-2
a 1 b 2 - w+2 @ col1 (not b-c-b-c) ; +3. Down to 1-1 for next 5; w+1 @ col4 (not 3-1-3-1)
1 b 1 a - no bet @ col1 ; w+1 @ col4 (not c-b-b-c)


Balance so far = +5  Highest bet 2-2 (once)

A.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Deejay on May 23, 06:56 PM 2012
Played tonight

Played Games: 21
Won Games: 21
Lost Games: 0


Looking good!
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: justanothergambler on May 24, 06:19 AM 2012
the waiting x amount of spins then bet is a non sense fo me. the number which was just drawn doesnt know it was drawn. they are all equiprobable.
better to play CONTINUOUSLY,  and if you want to add some randomness to the static play (line after line) just play after a random line on your list of previous lines.

and moreover, you should play the whole line not only the first bit.
and I already wrote weeks ago to play FOR not against because of many reasons:
1- mathematicaly the law of the third is applied underneath.
2- folllowing the trend
3- less risky bet! which mean a very flexible progression when betting one DZ or 1 CL at time.

if some of you has studied information and coding therory, here is an idea :
in that theroy a bit of information is either 1 or 0 , so for the DZ and COL it will be coded in 3 bits  0 1 and 2 as they are 3 possibilities dz 1 dz2 dz3 , idem for columns.
the original code 4 line was written like this : 2A1B
in coding theory we add some redundancy to the information bits to minimise the Pe( Probability of Error) means instead sending the bits 01 we send 00 11  or 01 01 the same bits twice or n times.
how we apply this to code 4 reverse ? we add the redundancy , we can CODE our code 4   like this :
Original code4  line 2A1B we code it to : 2A2A 1B1B or 2 AA 1 BB
lets take the new code : 2 AA 1 BB , we dnt have bet for dozens 2 and 1 , we can consider them  as delimiters, so we bet FOR AA ofter the 2 and then skip the 1 and bet FOR BB , I ve done some statistics of previous results and statisticaly we get from 1 to 3 bits repeat.
you can bet using the progression posted by a member above.
LEVEL 1 : 1 1  1 1
4 spins played if positif stay with level 1 if negatif then level 2
LEVEL 2 : 2 2  2 2
if positif then back to level 1, if negatif bet last level 3 : 3 3 3 3
and reset nomatter what the result of you balance negatif or postif. RESET to LEVEL 1, dnt worry they would be more winning streaks ahead.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 24, 12:16 PM 2012
Quote from: intrinseco on May 23, 06:41 AM 2012
Hi everybody, At first I would like to say that I didn't code "code 4" with the intention to be negative or denigrate any user or method. I just did it to give my  contribute to the forum showing the possible behavior of the system in a long term. I'm not against some users or any ideas. After my post I read some comments talking about the  way I played it every 37 spins was not a proper random. So to be fair I decided to run again the same 1 million spins but instead play a game very 37 spins, I'm playing a game every x spins,

where x =
171,42,85,41,195,134,88,82,44,115,159,137,141,37,177,148,141,22,119,56,190,85,58,35,193,183,95,18,156,93,127,105,103,26,59,109,174,66,65,95 ,30  ,174   ,24   ,118 ,36  ,109  ,197   ,48    ,167    ,76     ,84     ,183    ,183    ,135    ,60     ,149    ,182    ,175    ,112    ,38      ,148     ,185     ,27      ,196     ,143     ,39       ,109      ,158      ,50       ,45       ,66       ,159      ,115      ,45       ,52       ,156      ,29       ,28


(numbers downloaded from :.random.org (link:://:.random.org))

As we can see in the chart the result in the long term are pretty much the same but i noticed a difference, there are more positives waves, so I did a third run, the third chart shows us a zoom of the first 20.000 spins, 190 games without a loss, and 192 games with 1 loss. This situations happens very often playing this way and it is the reason because different users are having different results. Some of them are catching the positive wave from the begining and others from a middle point

With this I'm not pretending to say that code 4 doesn't work at all, I just thing we need more improvements and some of them could be done studing my charts and following others  opinions.

PS: To john leggend: If you send me exactly the way you play your hit and run, I can exactly put it in the code, I mean, for example:
day 1: first game 10:00
           second game  13:45
etc etc
day 2: first game: 11:36
etc etc

I can code 30 days with different hours per every day.

And also if some one has a txt file with real millions spins, that will be nice to see if there is some difference

Thanks
Hello Intrensico, the time I play Hit and run has nothing to do with its success. I have tried to get across its value but some will never get it. So you know when its time to stop pushing. HIT AND RUN works for one simple reason YOU ARE BREAKING RANDOMS CYCLE.
Its incredible that all the mathheads can't wait to get a method loaded into a useless simulator to see if it survives. But not one of them can put the REAL work in to see how it works in the only arena it needs to work real LIVE SPINS.

I have tried to break it down into laymans terms. Its simple and if you think about it makes perfect sense. But remember many don't deal in that World. I will try one more time for your benefit. EXAMPLE You know say a method like CODE 4 has paper odds of 80/1 So you must risk 80 units to play a game PROPERLY. To win 1 unit in return. Hmm not too attractiive a proposition to the average Joe. Or even the seasonned player.

Because over the years its got into a players brain that you can't beat this game to start with. So the thought of risking 80 units to win one is a definate no, no. RIGHT? Well Yes played in the normal way it would be. I will give you some simple statistics that to anyone with an open mind and reasonable intelligence should indicate that HIT AND RUN is a superior application.

I have played over 7,500 games of CODE 4 to date. Now if ever there was an indicator of HIT AND RUNS value this should be it. I play two games a session but always record four in total. Here is the breakdown of wins and losses over those four games or 15,000 (7,500 PLAYED, 7,500 VIRTUAL.

TOTAL Losses for the first game of each session over a possible 15,000=6
TOTAL Losses for the first 2 games of each session over a possible 15,000=15
TOTAL Losses for the first 3 games of each session over a possible 15,000=34
TOTAL Losses for the complete 4 games a session from a possible 15,000=42

I shouldnt have to say another thing And this is only four consecutive games imagine the fool playing 20 in a row. Those results tell anyone with any sense. Hit and Run is the superior way to play roulette. If I had only played a single game over a span of 3,250 games I would have only lost 6 progressions to date. Or 480 units lost as opposed to 3,250 won for a net profit of 2,770 units profit. And an 80 unit risk.

Its SIMPLE or so it should be THE LONGER YOU EXPOSE YOURSELF TO RANDOMS EBB AND FLOW, THE MORE YOU SHALL LOSE. Theres no ifs, buts or maybes about it. That is absolute fact. And the fact that is so hard for most to take onboard simply baffles me. And its without question the reason the vast majority of people on this and everyother forum in the land are still debating whether the games for the taking or not longterm. It certainly is, but NOT THE WAY THEY PLAY IT.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: dino246 on May 24, 12:36 PM 2012
Here Here J L, total agreement with the hit and run way of playing.
I played this way for the first time in 1996 long before i joined any of the forums.
One eye on the carpet and one eye on the door.
Any profits a profit in my book.
I have NEVER played the inside of the table ONLY the ZERO.
90% of my play is D + C.
Just a few thoughts !!!!
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 24, 12:43 PM 2012
Quote from: dino246 on May 24, 12:36 PM 2012
Here Here J L, total agreement with the hit and run way of playing.
I played this way for the first time in 1996 long before i joined any of the forums.
One eye on the carpet and one eye on the door.
Any profits a profit in my book.
I have NEVER played the inside of the table ONLY the ZERO.
90% of my play is D + C.
Just a few thoughts !!!!
Yes Dino but try convincing the other 99.9 % of that. They foolishly think if they stay at the table hours on end theres no difference to the smart player collecting small but consistent pockets of profit. In a way HIT and RUN must never catch on otherwise theyd have to change the rules or ban the game. And Id have to learn Blackjack lol.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 24, 02:21 PM 2012
Quote from: TwoCatSam on May 24, 01:01 PM 2012
TOTAL Losses for the first game of each session over a possible 15,000=6
TOTAL Losses for the first 2 games of each session over a possible 15,000=15
JOHN PLAY THE ABOVE

OTHER PEOPLE PLAYED THESE
TOTAL Losses for the first 3 games of each session over a possible 15,000=34
TOTAL Losses for the complete 4 games a session from a possible 15,000=42

John makes the perfect argument against "Hit and Run"  I have posed this same scenario for five years.  No one to date has debunked it.

OK, John plays his games and wins tons.

Other people playing Reverse Code 4 sit down right behind him and play.  THEY ARE DOOMED TO LOSE!

Can no one but me see that?

Why would a person who sits down right after a winner--any winner--have more or less chance to win?

I can just hear the wheel:  "Well, that John guy beat me, but I'll tear this guy a new one!"

You can outrun the "run from hell" for a while, but sooner or later they will gang up on you and you will see the time it takes to get back even is just not worth it--so you find another "can't fail" system and start over.

But if it works for you, go for it!

Sam
No Sam other people just keep playing and playing and playing. that's WHEN YOU can't AVOID THE RUN FROM HELL. Even playing 1 game and stopping you will lose Sam. Oh yes you will. But you will lose a lot LESS. that's what most cannot take onboard. I used to play like most people. And I lost like most people. Until I learnt the only way to really get ahead that's all I did LOSE. But if the majority of people cannot see that sitting their for hours on end they are far more likely to run into a losing game. Than the guy/girl who plays one or two games then shuts it down.

Lifetime losers they shall be.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ausguy on May 26, 03:48 AM 2012
Hi 55 pages of posters - I have come up with an idea originating from all the discussions & play of code 4 by many other posters.
In about 10 days I will be visiting my local city casino The Star in Sydney Australia. It will involve 2 phases of play. The 1st will be virtual betting to test the viability of the play. If proven worthwhile then live betting will go ahead fairly soon afterwards.

It will involve a hit & run strategy of 1 session at a table & leave that table on a win or a stop play loss after L3. As per the mantra of Mr. Johnny Legend. From the trigger numbers on the 1st table the 2nd table code numbers will be played. Then table 2 triggers table 3 and so on.

The Star table play area has at least 8 live dealer roulette tables. My idea is to not have the 12 spin seperation zones (apart from the 1st spin of the session,with these  spins taken off the marquee) to increase the plays per hour, roughly estimated at a theoretical 15 ?

The 8 tables will be I.D.'d  @ 1 - 8. From basic free online RNG I will run a series of 8 random numbers these random numbers will decide which table to use. If the same table number presents again then that is crossed off until a valid table presents.

My tests will show the likelyhood of positive results from the randomness associated with many different wheels ? It would not be possible to test this correctly unless you had a record of the spin & the time of each drop at each table. This is because spin frequencies ebb & flow at various tables due to the ever changing flow of players.

I've provisionally labelled my idea as code 3. The reason being that I only bet to level 3 due to the table limits, so only 3 vertical lines are relevant & the 4th position is not used.
In assessing code 4 with it, I originally had 4 rows of 3 instead of 3 rows of 4. This still maintained the 12 spin numbers seperation Zone as per the original.

It then evolved to the thinking of after the 1st table spin why not just use the last bet 3 spin group as triggers for the next chosen table to increase the bet frequencies ?
I also acknowledge that having only 3 bet column rows only allows either 2 dozens & 1 column or 2 columns & 1 dozen as bet choices. Testing will show if either is better then the other or an alternating mode improves the results?

Should my tests prove successful I would look to open a new thread under a code 3 banner? At this stage it's early days before we get to that point.

I now have the bankroll for at least 3 progression banks for code 3 betting, depending on my starting minimum. I'm leaning towards a higher starting minimum than the casino minimum to improve the profit/bet/time ratio.
This new bankroll is courtesy of a good win earlier in the week at Smart Live casino. See my posts on thread " is my online casino cheating." ? This shows that sometimes the planets align for a brief period & "hay was made while the sun shined."

In the meantime I'm finalising my bet sheet format and looking forward to some testing in coming days.          Cheers.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ausguy on May 26, 12:24 PM 2012
2cs - Thanks mate, I'll give it a good test with all results recorded, so all info. will be available.

Re - The table chips - Roulette has both custom coloured chips used for each live dealer table only and general cash play anywhere in casino chips. The majority of the tables are $5 min. inside bet tables with a lesser amount of $10 min. inside bet tables. The $5 min. inside bets go to a max. of $100. The even money bets range from $25 - $1,000. The 2 : 1 bet range is $10 - $500.

The $10 table is pretty much double the limits of the $5 table.

The bulk of play is on the $5 tables. Smart players use the custom colour $5 chips. Drone players often stuff things up with lots of $5 cash chip bets all over the table layout. Then there's often disputes as to whose bet is the winner & the video referee then has to scan the video playback? With cash chips at roulette there are also $10, $25, $100 , $500 & 1,000 units.These are generally not a problem as only a few people bet with them.
Only baccarat has the $5,000 chips for their $50,000 & $75,000 limit games. How about winning $50k on roulette and then putting it on an all up bet on banker ? Only in the movies me thinks?

The busier the time period the worse it gets with more drone players. Night time is always busy esp.Fri. & Sat. Noisey too.  I avoid these times as the more people at the tables the slower & less enjoyable betting is.  I'm retired now so I can go anytime I wish. Generally I leave home mid morning & get to the "DEN OF SIN " around mid- day. I'm usually out of the joint by 7pm, give or take.
I haven't been so much this year but if success smiles upon me that will certainly change.

I have confidence and experience at the tables. I also prepare myself well with premade bet cards & pens that work properly etc. All I need is to find a method that keeps on keeping on keeping on.
I think I'll have that answer in about 1 - 1/2 weeks ?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: ausguy on May 26, 11:48 PM 2012
2CS - A DRONE has its origins from the bee insect world. The DRONE bee is the male bee that doesn't work for the colony. It just lays about waiting for the mating time of a queen bee. Once this is done the union causes the DRONES death (loss of family jewels etc. I believe?)

DRONE also refers to the sustained musical notes put out by bagpipes, Indian sitars & reverb pedals on electric guitars.

This has then evolved (via old England ) to mean someone of below average functioning ability.
A boring lay about couch potato. The USA term of CHUMP could also fit in there too.

So enter the casino DRONES, serial losers clogging up the tables with a sea of $5 cash chips and so keeping the video checks busy. The casinos love these DRONES as their betting MO helps boost the casinos bottom line. To keep the DRONES repeat business they don't ruffle their feathers by insisting they use the $5 custom colour table chips. Using the video checker is a minor inconvenience for them.
The drones create problems on every area of the layout, 17B maybe sometimes?

17B is 007s number. Remember in Casino Royale were 007 parlayed 3 x 17B back to back winners to win $45million or simliar? Only in the movies can you bet "slightly" above the table limits and have prespin number recognition perception. Are the odds of that tri 17B sequence 50,000 + : 1 ?
What amused me in that movie was 007s boss reminding Bond he had to give the money in as it was deemed as belonging to the British Govt.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 27, 06:36 AM 2012
Quote from: Bettor 27 on Apr 17, 07:13 AM 2012
Hi Maui13,

I don't keep stats re 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th bet wins

I use 1,3,9,27 progression on a LIVE wheel.

Method of play is:
1A3B--CODE 1 FOR GAME 1
2A2A--CODE 2 FOR GAME 2
1B3C-------------------------VIRTUAL LINE BETWEEN TRIGGERS AND GAMES
1A2C--GAME 1 WIN BET 3
3B1C--GAME 2 WIN BET 1

Then leave the table for minimum 1 hour.

Repeat this 4 more times for a total of 10 games a day

Regards

B27
Bettor27 theres no need to leave the table for 1 hour. I can play 10 games in around ****ONE HOUR**** And its still HIT AND RUN. Example
SESSION 1---TABLE A---BACKTRACK MARKER BOARD FOR VIRTUAL 12 SPINS THEN
PLAY 2 GAMES.
Repeat this procedure 4 more times. on different wheels or live feeds. Or wait until an odd number of spins has gone like say 5 and continue on the same wheel. But only do this for a max of two times two.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Chauncy47 on May 27, 10:29 AM 2012
JL,  I know I have shared these results with you through PM's to you directly and to personally thanking you for the Hit & Run appraoch to beating the randomness.  I have played(tracked) 835 games to date and as you know I can only play at a live casino's here in the States.  My BR has grown to $3280 since the start of this jorney(remember I have $5 min bets to make). Out of those games, the Total Games Lost Including Zero:  42 Total Games Lost Because of Zero:  18.  I can give you the details of the results later when I have more time (headed to Casino on my day off)  All I can say is that I have treated this like a business.  I don't go to the Casino to drink, chase, tip or make conversation, I go there to WIN and then I leave.  I also never touch my BR because I want to slowly increase the stakes over this year.  I know HIT and Run isn't for everyone, but it works for me and I put in my time.  I went to the Casino almost every night for 6 months and never placed a bet, but rather observed and tracked results as if I was playing for real.  Looking forward to sharing more results in the forum as I have been a silent observer till now.   
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 27, 10:35 AM 2012
Very well done Chauncy47. You forgot to mention your success has been achieved on a DOUBLE ZERO wheel. That makes it all the more impressive. Keep it going once you reach 5000 units profit. You are at a level where anything is possible.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Chauncy47 on May 27, 10:46 AM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 27, 10:35 AM 2012
Very well done Chauncy47. You forgot to mention your success has been achieved on a DOUBLE ZERO wheel. That makes it all the more impressive. Keep it going once you reach 5000 units profit. You are at a level where anything is possible.

You are correct about that, I have the double zero's and the hit and run appraoch has allowed me to maneuver around both.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: GLC on May 27, 12:30 PM 2012
Thanks for the post Chauncy 47.  Your self-control and methodology are impressive.
Keep us posted on how you're doing.
It's an encouragement for all of us to hear how someone is actually beating this game.
We are very interested in some more details about how you play.  What's the most you've been down from your highest point in any given stretch of plays.  This is important because it gives us an idea of how many chips we should realistically need to guard against tanking if we start with some bad luck.
GLC
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Chauncy47 on May 28, 07:44 AM 2012
Quote from: GLC on May 27, 12:30 PM 2012
Thanks for the post Chauncy 47.  Your self-control and methodology are impressive.
Keep us posted on how you're doing.
It's an encouragement for all of us to hear how someone is actually beating this game.
We are very interested in some more details about how you play.  What's the most you've been down from your highest point in any given stretch of plays.  This is important because it gives us an idea of how many chips we should realistically need to guard against tanking if we start with some bad luck.
GLC

HI GLC,  I have gone to the 4th progression in P4 on the second game 2 times.  Yep, and with $5 min, that got my attention, so I changed my betting on the 2nd game to help minimize my exposure.   I still have never encountered a double loss in that method.  In Code 4, I have never gone past the 2nd progression in the 2nd game and have also changed my betting for the 2nd game to help minimize my exposure.   I still have not encountered a double loss in this method either. 
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 28, 05:00 PM 2012
Quote from: Chauncy47 on May 28, 07:44 AM 2012
HI GLC,  I have gone to the 4th progression in P4 on the second game 2 times.  Yep, and with $5 min, that got my attention, so I changed my betting on the 2nd game to help minimize my exposure.   I still have never encountered a double loss in that method.  In Code 4, I have never gone past the 2nd progression in the 2nd game and have also changed my betting for the 2nd game to help minimize my exposure.   I still have not encountered a double loss in this method either.
Hello Chauncy47 Your mindset and results are indeed impressive. And on a double zero wheel which is thought by most to be gambling suicide. Hit and Run can beat a double zero wheel because of its short in and out nature.

So You play PATTERN 4 and CODE 4? And Divide and Conquer and you are testing CODE 4 REVERSE ATTACK. And CODE 40?? Reverse attack has turned out to be less rewarding than I had originally hoped. But its still a profit maker. At present my strikerate has settled around the 18/1 mark.

The methods I play currently are

PATTERN BREAKER

DIVIDE AND CONQUER

CODE 4

CODE 4 REVERSE ATTACK

CODE 40------The only one that breaks with the usual HIT AND RUN. Its a percentage method that I am both playing and testing at the same time. If it holds up over 200 sessions. Which looks certain. I will present it to the forum. So far its consistency is very impressive. And its win/loss patterns within that set 40 spin frame. Show two glaring constants. That can be exploited every session to both recover loss and push towards securing a profit each session. Even to level stakes the 120 sessions I have played thus far. Have produced 92 winning games. Once you take advantage of the constants virtually every session will result in positive numbers.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Chauncy47 on May 29, 08:26 AM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 28, 05:00 PM 2012
Hello Chauncy47 Your mindset and results are indeed impressive. And on a double zero wheel which is thought by most to be gambling suicide. Hit and Run can beat a double zero wheel because of its short in and out nature.

So You play PATTERN 4 and CODE 4? And Divide and Conquer and you are testing CODE 4 REVERSE ATTACK. And CODE 40?? Reverse attack has turned out to be less rewarding than I had originally hoped. But its still a profit maker. At present my strikerate has settled around the 18/1 mark.

The methods I play currently are

PATTERN BREAKER

DIVIDE AND CONQUER

CODE 4

CODE 4 REVERSE ATTACK

CODE 40------The only one that breaks with the usual HIT AND RUN. Its a percentage method that I am both playing and testing at the same time. If it holds up over 200 sessions. Which looks certain. I will present it to the forum. So far its consistency is very impressive. And its win/loss patterns within that set 40 spin frame. Show two glaring constants. That can be exploited every session to both recover loss and push towards securing a profit each session. Even to level stakes the 120 sessions I have played thus far. Have produced 92 winning games. Once you take advantage of the constants virtually every session will result in positive numbers.

Hi JL,  I play P4, PB, Code  4, D&C and playing Hybrid D&C(testing mode, but playing for real), Reverse Attack(testing mode, but playing for real).   I remember something you once posted and that is: "to keep things as random as the game," so when I go to the Casino, I do just that, keep my method selection as random as possible.  This past weekend, I played PB, Code 4, D&C and D&C Hybrid.  There is nothing like playing at a B&M Casino.   Like everyone here in this forum, I have observed some pretty flukey things come up and I expect that it will happen to me, but it's not a show stopper.  When it comes to the double zero wheel, I do cover them on higher progressions but until that happens, I don't give it a second thought anymore.  For example, this past weekend, I played 50 games in 5 game sessions over the course of the day(s) and ended up covering the zero's on the very last game yesterday...lol.  Mr. Random couldn't make it easy and just allow me to walk out the door without a challenge.  Hit & Run can definitely beat the double zero wheel.  I sometimes read in these forums that these methods can't win in the long term using Hit & Run.  This is only my opinion and so it really only matters to me but I will share it here; I don't ever look at Hit & Run as "long term."  For randomness, there is only "now" ...not tomorrow, not next week, not next month, but only "now" ...that very moment in time when you enter the game.  It wouldn't be randomness if it knew tomorrow and next week and next month.  It only knows "now"!   I can't wait to start testing CODE 40!!!
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 29, 12:16 PM 2012
Quote from: Chauncy47 on May 29, 08:26 AM 2012
Hi JL,  I play P4, PB, Code  4, D&C and playing Hybrid D&C(testing mode, but playing for real), Reverse Attack(testing mode, but playing for real).   I remember something you once posted and that is: "to keep things as random as the game," so when I go to the Casino, I do just that, keep my method selection as random as possible.  This past weekend, I played PB, Code 4, D&C and D&C Hybrid.  There is nothing like playing at a B&M Casino.   Like everyone here in this forum, I have observed some pretty flukey things come up and I expect that it will happen to me, but it's not a show stopper.  When it comes to the double zero wheel, I do cover them on higher progressions but until that happens, I don't give it a second thought anymore.  For example, this past weekend, I played 50 games in 5 game sessions over the course of the day(s) and ended up covering the zero's on the very last game yesterday...LoL.  Mr. Random couldn't make it easy and just allow me to walk out the door without a challenge.  Hit & Run can definitely beat the double zero wheel.  I sometimes read in these forums that these methods can't win in the long term using Hit & Run.  This is only my opinion and so it really only matters to me but I will share it here; I don't ever look at Hit & Run as "long term."  For randomness, there is only "now" ...not tomorrow, not next week, not next month, but only "now" ...that very moment in time when you enter the game.  It wouldn't be randomness if it knew tomorrow and next week and next month.  It only knows "now"!   I can't wait to start testing CODE 40!!!

EXACTLY ****NOW****. Having said that CODE 40 is something I think very different. It knows ANYTIME.

Its a percentage method. That requires no HIT AND RUN and no steep progressions. And no ridiculous BRs to cope with expected drawdowns. Because there aren't any. It ticks along beautifully and grinds out certain profit overall. It may be my best effort ever because theres no triggers, no waiting time. And none of the above. You just enter the cycle and marvel at how Mr percentage controls random over that perfect 40 spin frame. After 130 played games I'm very pleased and impressed with the consistency. One other thing about CODE 40. It will tell you if a casino, rng, are cheating once and for all. Because this is the beauty of a good percentage method.

The breakdown in results are very similar with the occasional bias one way or the other. Now what I intend to do is break my own code of conduct this once to put to rest the argument especially abut RNGs. Live spins have given me what I expect over the last 130 sessions. If an RNG doesn't produce similar results. IF Nearly all the sessions are biased towards negative outcomes to the player. You have identified a definate cheating RNG. Because there is no way that can happen. On a real wheel with REAL RANDOM. Mr percentage is randoms keeper. It delivers the expected breakdown. as well as constants that as of yet haven't been breached.

If similar results are not attained on an RNG in REAL MONEY MODE. I say that because I can beat an RNG day and night in fun mode. Then without a shadow of a doubt I will know they are predatory and the outcome is decided before the wheel is even spun.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 29, 12:23 PM 2012
John may I ping 2 questions to you

1. I'm going to be playing paddypower live spins. They have 3 real spin dealer tables and I was going to try this. Jump in and count back 12 for first bet then track until next 12 numbers come out for 2 betting chances - hopefully 2 wins as well. I intend on doing this in the morning over the 3 tables with two games each = 6 games in the morning and repeat in evening/night time to make 12 games played a day. Is this too much for hit and run? I could reduce it to 1 tracked game each table for 3 games in the morning and 3 in the evening/night to make 6 games a day. What would you suggest?

2. Do you have separate bankrolls for each method? If so are you then sitting on a total combined BR of over £7k going by the results you have...or have you withdrawn some money out at this stage?

Thanks

Paul.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: TwoCatSam on May 29, 12:28 PM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 29, 12:16 PM 2012

I can beat an RNG day and night in fun mode.

John

If the above statement is true, why not use the same system/method you use to "beat RNG night and day in fun mode" except do it with real money? Then you could test the RNG.

I'll make you a deal.

I will soon have access to a real-money account at Bet Voyager.  If you'll give me the system/method you use to "beat RNG day and night in fun mode", I'll try it with real money, make movies and we'll just let the whole darn world know.

Members of the forum:

I have thrown down the proverbial gauntlet and offered to use my own real Euros.  If this bloke doesn't take me up on it, you might want to ask him why?

TwoCatSam
(A movie makin' man!)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Chauncy47 on May 29, 12:35 PM 2012
Quote from: Robeenhuut on May 29, 11:20 AM 2012
How many games did you play so far in testing any of the methods here?

I have played 910 games at B&M of mixed methods for $.  Prior to that, I went to the casino for 6 months and tested the same way I was planning on playing, which means 2 x 2 and no more than 5 games at one time. 
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on May 29, 12:58 PM 2012
Hello John

You make pretty decisive claim about your new and final method here  CODE 40.
After 130 sessions - are these games?. Don't you think its 2 early 4 such a quick paced method?
I can only assume that because we have not seen anything yet  ;)
I can give you a method that in 370 games involving 18k spins produced a 370/1 strike rate and anything over 31/1 strike rate gives you profit. Why I'm not posting it?
Because even it produced such stellar results i think its due 4 for correction although it would take 11 consecutive losses 2 go 2 break even level. But anything can happen  :D
After 10k games played CODE 4 you might go back 2 break even level as well.
There is always correction waiting 4 you and usually what goes up will come down eventually.

Good luck
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 29, 01:30 PM 2012
Quote from: subby on May 29, 12:23 PM 2012
John may I ping 2 questions to you

1. I'm going to be playing paddypower live spins. They have 3 real spin dealer tables and I was going to try this. Jump in and count back 12 for first bet then track until next 12 numbers come out for 2 betting chances - hopefully 2 wins as well. I intend on doing this in the morning over the 3 tables with two games each = 6 games in the morning and repeat in evening/night time to make 12 games played a day. Is this too much for hit and run? I could reduce it to 1 tracked game each table for 3 games in the morning and 3 in the evening/night to make 6 games a day. What would you suggest?

2. Do you have separate bankrolls for each method? If so are you then sitting on a total combined BR of over £7k going by the results you have...or have you withdrawn some money out at this stage?

Thanks

Paul.
Hello Subby nice to hear from you. To your first question. that's fine. Me personally I am thinking of playing HIT AND RUN in its purest form. One game a session why? Because CODE 4 has delivered me 3 losses in the last week. And they have all been on the SECOND game of the session. My worst period to date. So I am going to start playing just one game a session as that's been by far the most successful way to execute the application.

To your second question. I have an overall BR. But this is my main income. So I have to cream off profits for living expenses on a monthly basis. So for example I have won over 6,000 units for Code 4 over the last year or about £12,000 british pounds. But I have used a fair amount of that to live on. Its not compounded. I use very little in my Bankrolls anyway For Example I would have a BR of 500 units for PATTERN BREAKER.. Contrary to the thinking you need this huge pot to deal with draw-downs. YOU SHOULDNT. If your method is any good. There are no big drawdowns. It ticks along with the expected strikerate.

So for PATTERN BREAKER for example. I know the strikerate is approx 12/1 PLAYED hit and run.. It might have a slight variance one way or the other throughout the course of the month. But Its solid consistency means it loses how I expect it to lose overall. You don't get 10 losses in a row for example. Like many of the inferior methods will throw up. Then you have to claw your way out of a big hole just to break even. No with all the methods I employ you get occasional setbacks. And you then continue to push forward. that's how a good method should be. No nasty surprises.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 29, 01:46 PM 2012
Quote from: TwoCatSam on May 29, 12:28 PM 2012
John

If the above statement is true, why not use the same system/method you use to "beat RNG night and day in fun mode" except do it with real money? Then you could test the RNG.

I'll make you a deal.

I will soon have access to a real-money account at Bet Voyager.  If you'll give me the system/method you use to "beat RNG day and night in fun mode", I'll try it with real money, make movies and we'll just let the whole darn world know.

Members of the forum:

I have thrown down the proverbial gauntlet and offered to use my own real Euros.  If this bloke doesn't take me up on it, you might want to ask him why?

TwoCatSam
(A movie makin' man!)
Sam, Divide and Conquer, Pattern Breaker, Code 4 can beat an RNG in pratice/fun mode just as they do a live wheel. Its when you enter REAL MONEY MODE. The monkey business begins. And what CODE 40 will do is show the cheating IF its there without a shadow of a doubt. Because its not based on luck. Like Bayes and Superman insist HIT AND RUN must be.

Its based on the only aspect of math worth a hoot. When it comes to roulette PERCENTAGE. A regular consistent breakdown so consistent. and readable winning isnt a maybe anymore. If you have the intelligence and staying power to exploit its sure rewards. I had a percentage method before that was pretty good. This one is the BUSiNESS. And its down to AMKs stroke of genius with the alternating dozens and columns. They throw up just the perfect balance to allow Mr percentage to keep that little upstart random inline very consistently over a 40 spin cycle.

No luck, no HIT AND RUN, NO STEEP PROGRESSIONS. Just random tamed and ready to give us what we all want from the game. (Well I think what we all want, not sure with some of the attitudes on this forum) *****PROFIT******
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 29, 02:00 PM 2012
Quote from: TwoCatSam on May 29, 01:08 PM 2012
Final?

Sam
It will be my last method on this forum SAM,ROBEENHUUT. So you can bust out the champagne. And its fitting that it is probably the best of the lot. The easiest to grasp. And one that leaves no door of excuses open for the maths boys. They cant say it only wins because your lucky JL no-one else can match your results. They cant say hmmm he is risking 80 or whatever units to win just a piddly 1. They cannot say it takes an age just to get a game like MATRIX VERTICAL 5 could. Because the very thing they fawn over and say tells them roulette is a game of negative expectancy. Is the very thing that tames random and shows you its behaviour. Its constants no matter how untamable and erratic it appears to be. It still has to abide by its keeper. MR PERCENTAGE.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 29, 02:11 PM 2012
Quote from: Robeenhuut on May 29, 12:58 PM 2012
Hello John

You make pretty decisive claim about your new and final method here  CODE 40.
After 130 sessions - are these games?. Don't you think its 2 early 4 such a quick paced method?
I can only assume that because we have not seen anything yet  ;)
I can give you a method that in 370 games involving 18k spins produced a 370/1 strike rate and anything over 31/1 strike rate gives you profit. Why I'm not posting it?
Because even it produced such stellar results i think its due 4 for correction although it would take 11 consecutive losses 2 go 2 break even level. But anything can happen  :D
After 10k games played CODE 4 you might go back 2 break even level as well.
There is always correction waiting 4 you and usually what goes up will come down eventually.

Good luck
Robeenhuut you may be right. Time will tell I've had an awful week with CODE 4. Three losses in only 80 games albeit ALL on the second game of the session. But CODE 40. NO, this method has absolutley NOTHING to do with luck. I absolutely assure anyone who plays it as I advise will see positive numbers. Profit margins might vary a bit player to player. Because they are dictated by the variance of each game. But this method will once and for all separate the men from the boys. It can be run with as little as 40 units. And there are simply no excuses other than your own. Lack of staying power as always would be one example.

If you people are REALLY and I mean REALLY here to win. I'm giving it to you on a plate. Excuse free. I know what I will be doing. And any who are serious about beating this game consistently. Will be doing the same. Theres a time for debate and endless testing. And what ifs. And theres a time for go getting. And winning. And Bankroll building. And where is AMK??. Much thanks is due to him. Much thanks.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 29, 02:38 PM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 29, 01:30 PM 2012
Hello Subby nice to hear from you. To your first question. that's fine. Me personally I am thinking of playing HIT AND RUN in its purest form. One game a session why? Because CODE 4 has delivered me 3 losses in the last week. And they have all been on the SECOND game of the session. My worst period to date. So I am going to start playing just one game a session as that's been by far the most successful way to execute the application.

To your second question. I have an overall BR. But this is my main income. So I have to cream off profits for living expenses on a monthly basis. So for example I have won over 6,000 units for Code 4 over the last year or about £12,000 british pounds. But I have used a fair amount of that to live on. Its not compounded. I use very little in my Bankrolls anyway For Example I would have a BR of 500 units for PATTERN BREAKER.. Contrary to the thinking you need this huge pot to deal with draw-downs. YOU SHOULDNT. If your method is any good. There are no big drawdowns. It ticks along with the expected strikerate.

So for PATTERN BREAKER for example. I know the strikerate is approx 12/1 PLAYED hit and run.. It might have a slight variance one way or the other throughout the course of the month. But Its solid consistency means it loses how I expect it to lose overall. You don't get 10 losses in a row for example. Like many of the inferior methods will throw up. Then you have to claw your way out of a big hole just to break even. No with all the methods I employ you get occasional setbacks. And you then continue to push forward. that's how a good method should be. No nasty surprises.

Thanks for that, I think I'll run it at 3 in AM and 3 in PM for a total of 6 games (6 units) a day until I'm happy with my BR being 12-15 times a total loss. Might move up a level from £1 units to £2 at that point but it will take time to grow to that point. This is for me, an ULTRA marathon.

I've setup a spreadsheet tracking system and I'm going to treat this as a business for 120 days and see where I'm at at that point and review how I'm getting on. It tracks units won, ratios of loss/win, total losses, etc...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 29, 02:55 PM 2012
Quote from: subby on May 29, 02:38 PM 2012
Thanks for that, I think I'll run it at 3 in AM and 3 in PM for a total of 6 games (6 units) a day until I'm happy with my BR being 12-15 times a total loss. Might move up a level from £1 units to £2 at that point but it will take time to grow to that point. This is for me, an ULTRA marathon.

I've setup a spreadsheet tracking system and I'm going to treat this as a business for 120 days and see where I'm at at that point and review how I'm getting on. It tracks units won, ratios of loss/win, total losses, etc...
Beautiful thats how everyone should be treating this. LIKE A BUSINESS. Well im disappoined with CODE 4s performance this week but Ive had an amazing run. Im due a bad spell I suppose.If luck does indeed play a part in HIT AND RUN. But the new Kid on the block. Is another ballgame alltogether. This is why we dont put all our eggs in one basket. And a smart player has at least 3 solid methods at his disposal. CODE 40. Now gives me a famous five. And its so different from the other 4. Maybe the best of them all. And reliant on nothing but what will be as that wheel spins.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 29, 03:02 PM 2012
Quote from: vile on May 29, 02:27 PM 2012
Haven't been involved in those code matters purposely
as only once said previously It doesn't work/we know it
as it was tested throughouly by some roulette experts,
Sam included,long before /and why persuading people.that
black is white continously.Just my 2 cents.
Vile I'm not persuading anyone. I will put my side across, most will scuff at my beliefs and claims and continue on their own path. A very few might say this JL is over the top, but lets see if he has anything. And by that I mean they give it a SERIOUS try out. Not some plastic test band run on a machine that has as much to do with roulette as Englebert Humperdink.
So you can fawn over so-called roulette experts totally unreliable test results. To know if my methods work. You get it done in the only arena worth a hoot. The arena you intend to make your profit in. THE LIVE WHEEL.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Chauncy47 on May 29, 03:30 PM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 29, 02:55 PM 2012
Beautiful that's how everyone should be treating this. LIKE A BUSINESS. Well I'm disappoined with CODE 4s performance this week but I've had an amazing run. I'm due a bad spell I suppose.If luck does indeed play a part in HIT AND RUN. But the new Kid on the block. Is another ballgame alltogether. This is why we don't put all our eggs in one basket. And a smart player has at least 3 solid methods at his disposal. CODE 40. Now gives me a famous five. And its so different from the other 4. Maybe the best of them all. And reliant on nothing but what will be as that wheel spins.

JL, ...I wouldn't give those bad runs much thought...just look forward to the next amazing run(s).
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 29, 03:39 PM 2012
Quote from: Chauncy47 on May 29, 03:30 PM 2012
JL, ...I wouldn't give those bad runs much thought...just look forward to the next amazing run(s).
Exactly Chauncy. CODE 40 is the next amazing run. Its a method that will make you profit  as long as you play the game. Theres no maybe, mystery to it. What I love the most is its as logical as can be. There can be no excuses from the usual sources about luck. I can see some of them throwing a hissy fit and running into the night saying they won't be passing anymore comments on the subject. That happens when the truth hits certain people and they realize theres been something missed in the summary of roulette and logical outcome. I remember one such member acting in such a manner a year and a half ago. But then what we had wasn't instant it was solid but could take an age to deliver a game.

This is where CODE 40 resolves that probelm of RISK,TIME, REWARD. I know you will love it Chauncy47. Your resolve and mindeset is the best I've seen, even better than mine. To test for 6 months before you played for real. I have to hand it to you. You have nothing but success coming your way with this game overall.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 29, 03:45 PM 2012
Quote from: vile on May 29, 03:24 PM 2012
You get it done in the only arena worth a hoot. The arena you intend to make your profit in. THE LIVE WHEEL.


Exactly what have been doing on daily basis for years
now.Just returned from arena 4 hours battle.
And the outcome of that battle, Victory---defeat??????????????
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 29, 03:48 PM 2012
Quote from: jarabo002 on May 29, 03:40 PM 2012
We are impatient, Mr. Johnlegend, to know your new CODE40.

I keep very long in this forum and I learned a lot from you and other members. I know this time will be better than ever. ^-^


Nos sentimos impacientes, Mr. Johnlegend, por conocer su nuevo sistema CODE40.

Le sigo desde hace mucho en este foro y he aprendido mucho con usted y otros miembros. Sé que esta vez será mejor que nunca.
It will be if you can stay with it, I promise you that now. The method will drop on the forum this time next week. I will have a decent sample to report by then. And Unlike my testing error with CODE 4 reverse attack. This is solid no nonsense results from virgin spins not back testing on static results that had no relevance to the way that method played out.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 29, 05:58 PM 2012
Quote from: flukey luke on May 29, 05:49 PM 2012
It is funny reading the 'contradiction of terms' that we all walk into now and again.

Some of us like to use the term 'sweet spot'. What's that?

It's the optimum time to place a bet in the players eyes. It offers a good risk to reward if you get it right.

So what is 'hit and run'? Hit and run is placing a bet or possibly a few bets and then quitting. Some players don't think hit and run offers any advantage.

So is there any real difference between the sweet spot and hit and run. I could argue one can not exist without the other. (but I won't because a good method can definately have a sweet spot and therefore hit and run could/should be the best way to take advantage of it)

I don't know about sweet spot. What I look for in all my methods is a SWEET CONSTANT. Something that happens a lot, lot more than it doesn't. Once you nail that you have a winning method. It can be right in front of you sometimes but you cannot see it. And someone else might casually come along and say "But what is you did so and so". And all of a sudden you go bingo. My new Method has a sweet constant. Its happenned 130 times in a row now. Imagine you know something will always or at least virtually always occur in a maximum of 40 spins. that's a sweet constant.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 29, 07:17 PM 2012
Quote from: flukey luke on May 29, 06:06 PM 2012
I am looking forward to reading about it JL. There are definately sweet spots/constants in the game of roulette that are burried deep down.

A millionaire self-made man was asked by an interviewer to what single factor did he attribute his remarkable success.

'Luck,' he replied, 'but I had to work jolly hard for it!'
You have got to work hard full stop. Even when I deliever CODE 40. There will be several too lazy to run it properly and stay with it. This is to be expected. The few who are wise enough to stay the course are going to be making alot of profit over the coming years. Others will be making the usual excuses about oh this game cant be beat. And thats the way it goes.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Still on May 30, 01:33 AM 2012
John Legend is like a scientist. 

What i hear him saying is he's going to run a comparative test of CODE 40 on both LIVE and RNG wheels.  He's too good to run all CODE 40 testing on an RNG.  And the reason he's even considering RNG is, in my opinion, there have been reports indicating that either some RNG's may actually be fair, or some may be suitable for this type of system. It would be good to know which RNGs are fair in live play.  It would save a lot of effort down the road to making money.   But to be scientific, he needs to maintain what's called a control group.  He's saying CODE 40 performs so well, he'd be willing to test both side by side...in hopes of getting the same kinds of statistics his live play normally yields.   

Scientists sometimes get excited about their new findings.  Sometimes they publish their findings too soon, or with too much fan fare.  I find this less frustrating than secrecy and hoarding.  After all, none of this is costing anyone anything except the time to test it with a reasonable base unit.  Code 4 Reverse Attack "failed" with an 18/1 strike rate (some might debate that) over a break-even rate of 7/1 (did i get that right?),  and a less-than-controlled control group (some might debate that).  Yes, it was an alpha or beta and we looked like rats in a lab.  But it was free, and might lead to some better ideas down the road.

There are indeed symbolic comparisons to be made between this type of approach and some kind of prophet who preaches power (empowerment) and freedom.  There again, it could be worse.  This is less frustrating than the preachers of dis-empowering doctrines, or those who keep their magical powers under lock and key, shared only with an inner circle, or sold only to the highest bidder.

If i were to stand up and preach the truth, i would run into the same states of mind; those curious enough to follow along for a few miles (before falling by the wayside), those who utterly disbelieve from the get-go (unbelievers), and those who are willing to get up, get going, and get (sooner than later) to the end of the journey home (through perseverance).   

We can only be disappointed when we misplace our expectations.  The Twilight Zone we've been calling "the world"  has disappointment built in and everyone is some kind of gambler, hoping to gain something from it.  We have a little bit of random longevity...but not really a life.  The inevitable draw-down is always around the corner.  We postpone it as long as we can before starting over with a BR of pretty much zero.   Extracting anything constant out of chaos, confusion and random circumstances...is the closest this Twilight Zone will ever allow us to experience anything comparable to REALITY.

I say we believe in John Legend and his miracles.   Accept them as the symbols they are. It's a miracle anybody shares anything of value around here or any forum where there's money to be made from what most perceive as a limited source.  Seeking and finding the truth, believe me, is much more challenging, and requiring equal or more dedication.  So this is good practice.   

~Still   

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: jarabo002 on May 30, 01:51 AM 2012
Mr. JohnLegend has contributed much to this forum in some cases with results sometimes more successfully, sometimes less but we have to recognize a great job by him. :thumbsup:
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Maui13 on May 30, 05:56 AM 2012

This thing is getting out of hand! I've never seen any forum shoot down someone like this, specially someone who's been around on this forum for a while, and as far as I know has always been constructive.


John puts down a method, and the first thing that happens is people start shooting it down.
Take some numbers, play the method, come back and post your results. (good old pen and paper)
If you don't have the time to test it, who the hell are you to criticize it?


Methods come and go, but what I don't understand is why does John have to prove anything?Then every single member here should start posting vids and screen shots WITH proof of their methods (ridiculous)

Play the method the way he does, (fun money) if you like it try it on a real money account.
If you make a couple of bucks, great....if you don't, so be it.


Who am I that anyone should listen to, no one, no one special or with fantastic methods or anything.
I'm just a regular guy, like everyone on here, that enjoys breaking away from my everyday life, reading some good topics of what people believe might work on a roulette table.


The beauty of it all is, I HAVE THE POWER to choose whether I want to believe it or not. I have the power to test if I want, but no one has given me the right to publicly break or humiliate someone.
I am very sad to see whats happening here.


... and people say Roulette is a gentleman's game!


Ever heard of "contrsuctive critism" ?
Let me Wiki it for those who haven't...


"Constructive criticism aims to show that the intent or purpose of something is better served by an alternative approach"


Now please explain where the better served alternative approaches are in some of these posts?


I end this with what I said previously... YOU have the power to choose and your choice is your right,but you don't have the right to change someone else's choice!


Regards,
M

















Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on May 30, 06:16 AM 2012
With all due respect fellas/ladies....this is the Code 4 discussion thread. This e-arguing can be taken to general chat or whatever it is called....
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 30, 11:47 AM 2012
Quote from: drazen_cro on May 30, 04:29 AM 2012
Wouldnt like to argue just to say opinion.


I thought to myself ok am i crazy when i can't see why all this JL stuff and approach would work??
And then decided to ask over 20 professionals and very very knowledable people of this game about this . It is very interesting that NOT EVEN ONE didn't confirmed that such approach can work longterm. Not even close to that. And also martingale for the name of all gods?


But JL will say put asside their knowledge they don't have mental set to see what am i about.. Hm.. Realy?



It is strange (not to say hillarious) to see how one can avoid bigger draftdowns only by playing very very short bursts of play in bigger  time frames. Hm... realy?


All this code bombarding stuff realy are gettin anoying more and more. Is it possible to block some threads not to see them at all? NEVER AGAIN.


Regards


Drazen
Drazen what do you actually do on this forum??? You should count yourself lucky AMK doesnt block you from this thread. He is too nice a guy. You have a CHOICE you dont like me or the methods stay away or go and work on your own simple really.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 30, 12:08 PM 2012
Quote from: TwoCatSam on May 30, 12:11 AM 2012
John the Bloviator

Your disregard for logic and reason totally amaze me.  What you are--in effect--saying is this:  I'll take two unknowns and prove my theory.
If I want to measure a cucumber, I place a ruler beside it not an ear of corn.

What you propose to do is a conduct a test in which you cannot lose.  You assume and preach--incorrectly--that the system, Code 40, is infallible.
So--by that convoluted/tortured logic--if you lose the RNG must have cheated you.  Your system is great; the RNG is crooked.  If you should happen to
win--and how we'd know that, I don't know--then you could pronounce the RNG fair and your system flawless.

It is a win/win for John the Bloviator.

You sure bring life to the forum!!  I strongly suspect you'd set yourself afire if you had a large enough audience.

Sam
Sam maybe your years are catching up with you or something. Because while you are fond of quoting everything but the kitchen sink. Your understanding of the written English is slipping. I said I can beat an RNG IN PRACTICE/FUN MODE DAY AND NIGHT. And by Joe I can. Its when you start playing with that thing they call MONEY ever heard of that? that's when the monkey business begins. Now read that over and over until you take it in PROPERLY. Before you start your ridiculous, slanderous attacks.

And by the way I could care less whether you or anyone on this forum believes me or not. I never came here to prove anything to anyone. I came here to share what I have personaly learnt from  real experiences with certain methods and play applications. The response I am getting from certain charactors was expected.

The likes of you Drazen Cro, Bayes and Superman. Will take your negative beliefs to the grave. I tagged that one a while back. I am interested in the very few made of the right stuff. And they are of course the very few. As a good friend said to me sometime back about people in general. "YOU WOULD HAVE MORE CHANCE MAKING AN ATHEIST BELIEVE IN God. THAN YOU WILL A MATHS DEVOTEE THAT ROULETTE CAN BE TAKEN LONGTERM". Was he right??Absolutely.

I don't care what you think of me be sure of that. As I just said to Drazen Cro. You have a choice if you don't like me or my methods. Simply ignore me and do your own thing. Its that simple really.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 30, 12:24 PM 2012
Quote from: Still on May 30, 01:33 AM 2012
John Legend is like a scientist. 

What i hear him saying is he's going to run a comparative test of CODE 40 on both LIVE and RNG wheels.  He's too good to run all CODE 40 testing on an RNG.  And the reason he's even considering RNG is, in my opinion, there have been reports indicating that either some RNG's may actually be fair, or some may be suitable for this type of system. It would be good to know which RNGs are fair in live play.  It would save a lot of effort down the road to making money.   But to be scientific, he needs to maintain what's called a control group.  He's saying CODE 40 performs so well, he'd be willing to test both side by side...in hopes of getting the same kinds of statistics his live play normally yields.   

Scientists sometimes get excited about their new findings.  Sometimes they publish their findings too soon, or with too much fan fare.  I find this less frustrating than secrecy and hoarding.  After all, none of this is costing anyone anything except the time to test it with a reasonable base unit.  Code 4 Reverse Attack "failed" with an 18/1 strike rate (some might debate that) over a break-even rate of 7/1 (did i get that right?),  and a less-than-controlled control group (some might debate that).  Yes, it was an alpha or beta and we looked like rats in a lab.  But it was free, and might lead to some better ideas down the road.

There are indeed symbolic comparisons to be made between this type of approach and some kind of prophet who preaches power (empowerment) and freedom.  There again, it could be worse.  This is less frustrating than the preachers of dis-empowering doctrines, or those who keep their magical powers under lock and key, shared only with an inner circle, or sold only to the highest bidder.

If i were to stand up and preach the truth, i would run into the same states of mind; those curious enough to follow along for a few miles (before falling by the wayside), those who utterly disbelieve from the get-go (unbelievers), and those who are willing to get up, get going, and get (sooner than later) to the end of the journey home (through perseverance).   

We can only be disappointed when we misplace our expectations.  The Twilight Zone we've been calling "the world"  has disappointment built in and everyone is some kind of gambler, hoping to gain something from it.  We have a little bit of random longevity...but not really a life.  The inevitable draw-down is always around the corner.  We postpone it as long as we can before starting over with a BR of pretty much zero.   Extracting anything constant out of chaos, confusion and random circumstances...is the closest this Twilight Zone will ever allow us to experience anything comparable to REALITY.

I say we believe in John Legend and his miracles.   Accept them as the symbols they are. It's a miracle anybody shares anything of value around here or any forum where there's money to be made from what most perceive as a limited source.  Seeking and finding the truth, believe me, is much more challenging, and requiring equal or more dedication.  So this is good practice.   

~Still   
Still no dis-respect. But CODE 4 REVERSE ATTACK hasn't failed. Its hovering between 18/1 and 20/1 at present. that's far from a failure as it requires around 10/1 to break even. Its not as lucrative as I had at first hoped for. But my testing error is to blame for that. But anytime you even make a few percent over breakeven with a method you are doing what nearly everyone alive thinks impossible. You are beating the game of roulette.

And to anyone who thinks no one would publish a method if it really worked. You could publish them  day and night. Have billboards all over the place advertising them. Have them on the radio, TV the Internet. But you know what you could never do? Give the MASSES the mindset to play them faithfuly and stay with them LONG ENOUGH to do real damage. And that will be the same always.

I don't know how many members there are on this forum for example. But very few of them have what it takes. They have roulette killers sitting all over this forum. But they are not of the mind to ever use them to do what they were intended to do. That's where you can't help them.

They will skirt around them make excuses about logic and reasoning. Say ole JL never told me what to do if a Zero shows up. Ever heard of PM Bayes? If you were really that interested you could have PMed me I don't spend all my time wading through every post on this forum. There is a possibility I can miss some. Has that ever crossed your mind? And you talk of selective. You know my stand on testing. Of course I will favour those who do it the RIGHT WAY. That's obvious. Your indifference and lazyness is your shortcoming Bayes. You are fond of sneering at people and passing your silly one liners.

But when it comes down to the real meat and potatoes of the issue. You will back out everytime. You had no intention of testing CODE 4 REVERSE. From the getgo. Be honest about that.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 30, 01:00 PM 2012
Quote from: Maui13 on May 30, 05:56 AM 2012
This thing is getting out of hand! I've never seen any forum shoot down someone like this, specially someone who's been around on this forum for a while, and as far as I know has always been constructive.


John puts down a method, and the first thing that happens is people start shooting it down.
Take some numbers, play the method, come back and post your results. (good old pen and paper)
If you don't have the time to test it, who the hell are you to criticize it?


Methods come and go, but what I don't understand is why does John have to prove anything?Then every single member here should start posting vids and screen shots WITH proof of their methods (ridiculous)

Play the method the way he does, (fun money) if you like it try it on a real money account.
If you make a couple of bucks, great....if you don't, so be it.


Who am I that anyone should listen to, no one, no one special or with fantastic methods or anything.
I'm just a regular guy, like everyone on here, that enjoys breaking away from my everyday life, reading some good topics of what people believe might work on a roulette table.


The beauty of it all is, I HAVE THE POWER to choose whether I want to believe it or not. I have the power to test if I want, but no one has given me the right to publicly break or humiliate someone.
I am very sad to see what's happening here.


... and people say Roulette is a gentleman's game!


Ever heard of "contrsuctive critism" ?
Let me Wiki it for those who haven't...


"Constructive criticism aims to show that the intent or purpose of something is better served by an alternative approach"


Now please explain where the better served alternative approaches are in some of these posts?


I end this with what I said previously... YOU have the power to choose and your choice is your right,but you don't have the right to change someone else's choice!


Regards,
M
Maui 13 You summed it up perfectly. But its okay I expected this from many. It comes with the territory. I don't need to come here. I only do so to show those who are not yet closed books. That this game is very beatable when applied in certain ways. 99.9 percent cannot be reached. Their mind is already made up you have to accept that. The tiny, tiny minority that has the right mindset. Might say lets hear this upstart out. And theyll test the methods the right way.

And they will of course make a profit. It might not always be stellar but a profit nevertheless.
So let them do their worst. I am thick skinned. It only shows what I know already. So desperate is this Sam charactor, he is now slyly trying to imply that Chauncy47 Is actually me. As if no one else could have a mind of their own. And not be a mathematicians lapdog. Wonders never cease.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 30, 02:09 PM 2012
Quote from: ausguy on May 30, 01:53 PM 2012
This 80/1 odds thing seems to have lost its way here ?

It should be the amount of money at risk to win 1 unit of betting upon reaching level 4 on twin
2 : 1 betting ?  So in that circumstance  80 : 1 is correct when expressed as a risk ratio not the betting odds. There are 2 separate main factors to consider here.

2 : 1 betting, people, in this CODE 4 case is, in approx.terms, 2 chances to win covering 24 numbers against 1 chance to lose with 12 numbers not covered. So that makes it 66.7% chance to win on any spin & 33.3% chance to lose. To be more exact, on a single zero wheel it's 24/37 = 64.9% chance of winning vs 13/37 = 35.1% chance to lose.
On the twin zero wheel we get 24/38 = 63.2% & 14/38 = 36.8%.

Accordingly the odds of winning or losing remain constant for any spin level.

Is it not such as                    L1  1 + 1 = 2 : 1
this for the risk
outlay ratio?                         L2  3 + 3 = 6
                                                         = 8  : 1
                                            L3   9+9 = 18
                                                          = 26 : 1
                                           L4  27+27= 54
                                                           = 80 : 1


The 3 : 1 odds thingo mentioned does not fit into any bet odds by my assessment?
Losing 3 times (L3) and winning at L4 is a statistic not odds?

Totally agree that the L4 loss risk to potential recovery is high and would take a number of hours of winning bets just to recover. Higher unit amounts may improve that recovery time ?

The whole point of hit & run is surf the higher probability of a win at L1 or L2 and leave the table on any win.

JL & others are indicating that in the majority of bet sessions this is the case. Thus their mantra that they are winning more than losing.

Constant longer term bet success is yet to be revealed. Apart from a persons time it costs nothing to virtual test these ideas.
I'll be doing just that next week, hit run, on multiple live dealer tables at our local casino here in Sydney OZ.

Note - Live tables as suggested, not RNG ?

Results to be published on this thread soon after.
Exactly. The excuses will never stop Ausguy. Theyre too plain lazy to do it the right way.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 30, 02:33 PM 2012
Quote from: dino246 on May 30, 02:26 PM 2012
Hey, John.
I hope i"m one of the deserving !!!!
Please keep on IMPROVING the MATRIX systems, as i BELIEVE betting the VERTICAL spins is the way forward to PROFIT whether HIT + RUN or not.
Cheers,
Dino.
Thanks DINO (You are) actually with CODE 40 it doesn't matter. Mr percentage shows you randoms lifestyle so beautifully you will never have any fears of laying a bet ever again. You know balance and rebalance is always on its way no matter how badly your session might start. Its a work of art. Because it needs no special anything to work. It just does. And the fact that this hasn't been spotted before has me more than amazed. I'm angry I didn't see it years ago. But its down to the Author of this thread AMK. Without that beautiful alternation between dozens and columns.

It couldnt work so consistently.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: jarabo002 on May 30, 02:45 PM 2012
That sounds very nice.

I understand first of all the roulette game as fun and not as a business and there are systems that is very enjoyable because they are very entertaining and very exciting. Each game is a challenge, a competition.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Chauncy47 on May 30, 02:46 PM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 30, 01:00 PM 2012
Maui 13 You summed it up perfectly. But its okay I expected this from many. It comes with the territory. I don't need to come here. I only do so to show those who are not yet closed books. That this game is very beatable when applied in certain ways. 99.9 percent cannot be reached. Their mind is already made up you have to accept that. The tiny, tiny minority that has the right mindset. Might say lets hear this upstart out. And theyll test the methods the right way.

And they will of course make a profit. It might not always be stellar but a profit nevertheless.
So let them do their worst. I am thick skinned. It only shows what I know already. So desperate is this Sam charactor, he is now slyly trying to imply that Chauncy47 Is actually me. As if no one else could have a mind of their own. And not be a mathematicians lapdog. Wonders never cease.

Hi JL,  I gladly look forward to anything you have to share whether it be here in the forum or in a PM.  There will always be those individuals that question methods, styles, approach, math, mindset or whatever it is, but the simply fact remains that you have been kind enough to offer up methods publically.  I am very thankful that you decided to do that because my BR has continued to grow.  I will have to touch base with AMK in a PM much like I did you.  As you mentioned, the game is very beatable.       
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 30, 02:51 PM 2012
Quote from: Chauncy47 on May 30, 02:46 PM 2012
Hi JL,  I gladly look forward to anything you have to share whether it be here in the forum or in a PM.  There will always be those individuals that question methods, styles, approach, math, mindset or whatever it is, but the simply fact remains that you have been kind enough to offer up methods publically.  I am very thankful that you decided to do that because my BR has continued to grow.  I will have to touch base with AMK in a PM much like I did you.  As you mentioned, the game is very beatable.     
Yes Chauncy AMK is a very nice person humble and appreciative. Without him. CODE 4, CODE 4 REVERSE AND CODE 40 would not exist. I will never forget that. Not to mention the other gem im starting to test Warriors HYBRID DC4. That looks a bit special too. Its all here on this forum in abundance. Sadly what isnt here are enough of the right people. But we cant have it all.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Chauncy47 on May 30, 02:56 PM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 30, 02:51 PM 2012
Yes Chauncy AMK is a very nice person humble and appreciative. Without him. CODE 4, CODE 4 REVERSE AND CODE 40 would not exist. I will never forget that. Not to mention the other gem I'm starting to test Warriors HYBRID DC4. That looks a bit special too. Its all here on this forum in abundance. Sadly what isnt here are enough of the right people. But we can't have it all.

I have been testing the HYBRID DC and have done very well and can send you my results.  I agree, its a nice little gold nugget to add.  I thanked him for offering it up.  I will drop AMK a quick PM ....
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: jarabo002 on May 30, 02:57 PM 2012
Quote from: dino246 on May 30, 02:53 PM 2012
Hi Jarabo.
Roulette to ME is not fun, but it is a BUSINESS.
I view each bet as an INVESTMENT - DECISION.
I must make PROFIT not woopee !! ( as the song goes ).

All the best,
Dino.

Well, what I mean is that like most of the time just losing, always stay with a good thing that consoles me, a bit of good fun.

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: dino246 on May 30, 02:58 PM 2012
John, i agree.
Often the "right" people are there.......watching.................AND..............silent.
Aperthy RULES OK !!!!!!!!!
Dino.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 30, 03:03 PM 2012
Quote from: dino246 on May 30, 02:53 PM 2012
Hi Jarabo.
Roulette to ME is not fun, but it is a BUSINESS.
I view each bet as an INVESTMENT - DECISION.
I must make PROFIT not woopee !! ( as the song goes ).

All the best,
Dino.
That should be our slogan Dino Lol!!!
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on May 30, 03:12 PM 2012
Hello everybody,

I will be editing the CODE 4 thread and a lot of posts might be lost. I am am sorry if this upsets anybody. I have nothing against anybody. I feel it is important for people just starting to play roulette to get a clear impression of CODE 4 and JohnLegends perspective of it as he has the expertise. With this I mean he as actually been playing CODE 4 for a year now. Until you have played CODE 4 for a year I feel you cannot criticize and say it is no good or that JL is the only one to get these results etc. At least play it for a month first and lose x amount of units before passing judgment. 

From now on I will be only keeping posts on the CODE 4 thread which highlight peoples progress, interesting questions, possible advancements etc. Discussion about if hit and run or CODE 4 is effective etc will be deleted, we have more than enough of those.

I will start a thread in the General Discussion Zone called "CODE 4 Discussions" where people can discuss anything they like.

The CODE 4 thread must remain "user friendly" for people searching for the answer as I once did.

I wish everyone the best and success in roulette.

Hopefully no hard feelings out there :)

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 30, 03:17 PM 2012
Quote from: amk on May 30, 03:12 PM 2012
Hello everybody,

I will be editing the CODE 4 thread and a lot of posts might be lost. I am am sorry if this upsets anybody. I have nothing against anybody. I feel it is important for people just starting to play roulette to get a clear impression of CODE 4 and JohnLegends perspective of it as he has the expertise. With this I mean he as actually been playing CODE 4 for a year now. Until you have played CODE 4 for a year I feel you cannot criticize and say it is no good or that JL is the only one to get these results etc. At least play it for a month first and lose x amount of units before passing judgment. 

From now on I will be only keeping posts on the CODE 4 thread which highlight peoples progress, interesting questions, possible advancements etc. Discussion about if hit and run or CODE 4 is effective etc will be deleted, we have more than enough of those.

I will start a thread in the General Discussion Zone called "CODE 4 Discussions" where people can discuss anything they like.

The CODE 4 thread must remain "user friendly" for people searching for the answer as I once did.

I wish everyone the best and success in roulette.

Hopefully no hard feelings out there :)
Thats sensible the thread is about the great method CODE 4 Good decision AMK.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: dino246 on May 30, 03:20 PM 2012
AMK.
I agree with all your comments.
Sorry if i have been OFF TOPIC with a few of my posts !!
Please delete as you wish ( including this one !!!!! )

All the very best and THANK YOU and JOHN for the CREATIVE work that has been produced to date.
Dino.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: albertojonas on May 30, 05:31 PM 2012
Quote from: justanothergambler on May 30, 04:47 PM 2012
from the big picture , CODE4 cardinal set is arrangements of 4 elements in which each element take 3 values that's gives 3Exp(4) or 3x3x3x3 = 81.
in code4 reverse you play for a match means you play ONE Dz at time, in CODE4 normal you play 2Dzs at time.
now the roulette as memoryless system, it generate its numbers the events are random ,  independent and mutually exclusive, it doesn't give a darn you play CODE4 or CODE8000000 at each trial it generate ONE number means one DZ/CL and only 1, if you playing ONE DZ or 1 CL for a match then you have 1/3 chance (ignoring zero) to win: hence the 1/3 which you didn't grasp. if you playing original CODE4 (bet opposite) you select 2 Dz or 2 CL means your chance are always 2/3  nomatter what system you are playing when it comes to Dzs and CLs.

as for risk ratio calculations, that's if you played that marty what if you flat bet or used another progression!?
cheers.


D & C reverse bet holds very well played on both columns and dozens at the same time, Flat Betting.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Bettor 27 on May 31, 05:31 AM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on May 27, 06:36 AM 2012
Bettor27 theres no need to leave the table for 1 hour. I can play 10 games in around ****ONE HOUR**** And its still HIT AND RUN. Example
SESSION 1---TABLE A---BACKTRACK MARKER BOARD FOR VIRTUAL 12 SPINS THEN
PLAY 2 GAMES.
Repeat this procedure 4 more times. on different wheels or live feeds. Or wait until an odd number of spins has gone like say 5 and continue on the same wheel. But only do this for a max of two times two.

Thanks for clarifying John
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: dino246 on May 31, 05:46 AM 2012
Small session, not played Hit + Run ( Sorry John ! ).
STEP          ONE          6 WON
STEP          TWO         3 WON
STEP          THREE      DNQ
ZERO         STEP ONE WON
All TRUE stats are helpfull !!

Cheers,
Dino.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on May 31, 11:11 AM 2012
Quote from: dino246 on May 31, 05:46 AM 2012
Small session, not played Hit + Run ( Sorry John ! ).
STEP          ONE          6 WON
STEP          TWO         3 WON
STEP          THREE      DNQ
ZERO         STEP ONE WON
All TRUE stats are helpfull !!

Cheers,
Dino.

Hello Dino

There is no need 2 contribute a single session results. ;D Im happy that you made some coin but really next time do some more testing please.  This really does not tell us anything.

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on May 31, 11:14 AM 2012
Hello players,

If you would like to make a post discussing if hit and run works or if CODE 4 is just not a good method please post it in the "CODE 4 Discussions" thread in the General Discussion Zone (Looks very interesting by the way). If you actually post live results for CODE 4 and they are negative I will leave them on the thread. Posts which discuss CODE 4 in a positive light will remain from this point on. There are enough posts on the thread discussing if CODE 4 and hit and run are bad.

For all new comers who want to gain a better understanding of hit and run and suitable methods please refer to JohnLegends past posts which can be found by clicking on his icon. If you would like to research counter arguments please refer to Bayes past posts.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on May 31, 11:25 AM 2012
Quote from: amk on May 31, 11:14 AM 2012
Hello players,

If you would like to make a post discussing if hit and run works or if CODE 4 is just not a good method please post it in the "CODE 4 Discussions" thread in the General Discussion Zone (Looks very interesting by the way). If you actually post live results for CODE 4 and they are negative I will leave them on the thread. Post which discuss CODE 4 in a positive light will remain from this point on. There are enough posts on the thread discussing if CODE 4 and hit and run is bad.
For all new comers who want to gain a better understanding of hit and run and suitable methods please refer to JohnLegends past posts which can be found by clicking on his icon. If you would like to listen to counter arguments please refer to Bayes past posts.

Hello

Is it not 2 much censorship? If somebody stays within rules he should be still allowed 2 post here?  I already expressed some concern about personal attacks here but creating a separate thread will add more 2 confusion....
Anyway i will  probably be deleted  ;D
Regards

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: TwoCatSam on May 31, 12:16 PM 2012
And if you want to know the real truth about Code 4, see my movie at testing before they take it down.

This forum seems to have some sort of agenda to push the ideas of John Legend and stifle criticism.

The movie says it all.......

TCS
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: superman on May 31, 01:55 PM 2012
QuoteThis forum seems to have some sort of agenda to push the ideas of John Legend and stifle criticism

Nah Sam, there's only a handfull of true followers of his methods, a few trying to keep the peace maybe, but as you've said in a few threads now, the hype, the waiting then the plunge are so dragged out its dished out to those that really really want to believe, as afew have already said the methods hit rates are still inline with normality after it all boils down.

NOW the man says his next method (whats wrong with all the other ones that are the dogs dangly bits?) isn't going to use hit n run, although the same man has said the only way to play is perfect timing and hit n run, go figure
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: TwoCatSam on May 31, 02:23 PM 2012
Sup

While in the shower, the definitive argument against hit and run came to me. 

Should I open a thread and try one more time, or just forget it?

Sam
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on May 31, 02:29 PM 2012
Hey guys,

Sorry if I come across as unfriendly or bias. We were just going back and forth to much and this is why I opened a CODE 4 Discussions thread. CODE 4 is for players who like hit and run and appreciate JohnLegends input. It might seem biased but this is only because JohnLegend is the expert concerning CODE 4. He has played it for a year with great results. What else can we say but great playing. If year one is any bench mark to go by year two cannot be that disappointing. Perhaps some players are correct in saying that things will level off. But if I had 6400 units and I drop down to say 3000 units I quit the method and start another one, a larger form of hit and run so to speak.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: vile on May 31, 02:39 PM 2012
No such thing as HIT AND RUN,my friend.Its only words.
What about when you RUN before HIT....run out broke.
Will you after first miss seeking more opportunites,3,9,27,
these kind of bets never wins.Remember Steve Morgan????
1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3.....and now/but he would wait hours this
to happen,if ever,on daily basis/he would start to bet that 1,2,3
won't repeat.....end of the story is well known.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Drazen on May 31, 02:48 PM 2012
Quote from: amk on May 31, 02:29 PM 2012
It might seem biased but this is only because JohnLegend is the expert concerning CODE 4.


True. But he is ONLY ONE of that kind in the world. Beside some very clever heads here? And beside the ones who had also spent decades  taming the wheel right in the hell (read casino)? Is it realy possible?


Regards


Drazen
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: TwoCatSam on May 31, 02:48 PM 2012
I do remember Steve and Jerry Adams, too.  Both had the same basic idea.

WardBlack once posted something I'm still thinking about.  The "rolling dozen" as he called it.  What it did was identify a dozen sleepers.  There's gotta be a bet there.

Sam
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 31, 03:13 PM 2012
Quote from: superman on May 31, 01:55 PM 2012

Nah Sam, there's only a handfull of true followers of his methods, a few trying to keep the peace maybe, but as you've said in a few threads now, the hype, the waiting then the plunge are so dragged out its dished out to those that really really want to believe, as afew have already said the methods hit rates are still inline with normality after it all boils down.

NOW the man says his next method (what's wrong with all the other ones that are the dogs dangly bits?) isn't going to use hit n run, although the same man has said the only way to play is perfect timing and hit n run, go figure
Amazing you have all the time in the world to run me down Superman but you couldnt even test CODE4 REVERSE for 100 games. That says it all.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: amk on May 31, 03:42 PM 2012
Could we please jump over to the CODE 4 Discussions thread for discussing hit and run and who is right and who is wrong. CODE 4 is a thread I created for players willing to venture down the path of hit and run and playing alternating dozens and columns. We understand by now that some people like it and others don't. I propose that if you do not like it post your comments on the CODE 4 Discussions thread. If you like hit and run and CODE 4 please feel free to share your thoughts on this thread this way all can express themselves and not get in each others way. I don't like deleting but if you see your post deleted you know why.

Hope we can at least stay friendly, negativity in any shape or form is just that negative and will only breed more. Ofcourse I understand if some people do not like hit and run etc and that is not negative to express that view but not over and over again. I suggest we try and move on now, we all know where we stand, lets focus our efforts on developing new methods, suggesting improvements and so on, not on conversations which resemble arguments in bars.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 31, 03:48 PM 2012
Quote from: amk on May 31, 03:42 PM 2012
Could we please jump over to the CODE 4 Discussions thread for discussing hit and run and who is right and who is wrong. CODE 4 is a thread I created for players willing to venture down the path of hit and run and playing alternating dozens and columns. We understand by now that some people like it and others don't. I propose that if you do not like it post your comments on the CODE 4 Discussions thread. If you like hit and run and CODE 4 please feel free to share your thoughts on this thread this way all can express themselves and not get in each others way. I don't like deleting but if you see your post deleted you know why.

Hope we can at least stay friendly, negativity in any shape or form is just that negative and will only breed more. Ofcourse I understand if some people do not like hit and run etc and that is not negative to express that view but not over and over again. I suggest we try and move on now, we all know where we stand, lets focus our efforts on developing new methods, suggesting improvements and so on, not on conversations which resemble arguments in bars.
You are of course right AMK. I am going to simply ignore negative ignorant people. And respond to those who arent closed books.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: TwoCatSam on May 31, 05:49 PM 2012
AMK

I'm pretty much done.   I'll just drift off with the rest of the ignorant people and scratch where it itches.

There is one question I'd ask:  What are you and John trying to accomplish?

I find it amazing......

Samster
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on May 31, 06:15 PM 2012
Quote from: TwoCatSam on May 31, 05:49 PM 2012
AMK

I'm pretty much done.   I'll just drift off with the rest of the ignorant people and scratch where it itches.

There is one question I'd ask:  What are you and John trying to accomplish?

I find it amazing......

Samster
What I am personally trying to accomplish Sam is to show the openminded that this game is for the taking longterm. If you apply yourself to it in the right way. I know, I know I was supposed to be another maths lapdog who fawns over Supermans or whoevers bot tests and just shrug my shoulders and fess up yup. This is a fools game. Stick to scrabble.

But I already know that's far from the case if I even show a few people likewise. If they throw away everthing they THINK they know about what will be with this game. They are going to win overall. Chauncy47 is such a person. that's why I came here for people like him.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on Jun 15, 03:23 AM 2012
Ok I'm in my new house, internet back on and starting code 4 again. This time I'm treating it like a business....in and out with no playing poker or side games.

I'm playing a 3 bet strategy until I can grow my BR up to a good £600+ then I'll move on to 4 bet sequence...maybe I'll see how it goes if I move to 4 or stay on 3 bets

Playing £1 units and a strategy of 3 games in the morning and 3 in the evening

CODE 4               
1-1, 3-3, 9-9 (1 zero)   is 27 units            
               
wins on first   8            
wins on second   4            
wins on third   3            
               
               
CURRENT BANKROLL    £38    (starting BR of £50)         
                     
               
TOTAL WINS   15             
               
LOSSES   1            
               
Win/Lose ratio   15   to   1   


Managed to hit a loss already but I'm not worried. Disappointed yes but I know that's a blip. I'll keep posting a weekly update in this thread if it's ok with you lot  O0

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Drazen on Jun 15, 04:12 AM 2012
Quote from: subby on Jun 15, 03:23 AM 2012
Disappointed yes but I know that's a blip.


Blip?? Please don't call it like that.


And don't be disappointed my friend . Be happy! It is (will be) great lesson by professor Martingale. He is one of the best teachers you can find around. And you ll be smart and educated in no time. I can assure you.


Just continue to be so diligent student  :thumbsup:


Regards


Drazen




Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: justanothergambler on Jun 15, 07:57 AM 2012
Quote from: subby on Jun 15, 03:23 AM 2012
Ok I'm in my new house, internet back on and starting code 4 again. This time I'm treating it like a business....in and out with no playing poker or side games.

I'm playing a 3 bet strategy until I can grow my BR up to a good £600+ then I'll move on to 4 bet sequence...maybe I'll see how it goes if I move to 4 or stay on 3 bets

Playing £1 units and a strategy of 3 games in the morning and 3 in the evening

CODE 4               
1-1, 3-3, 9-9 (1 zero)   is 27 units            
               
wins on first   8            
wins on second   4            
wins on third   3            
               
               
CURRENT BANKROLL    £38    (starting BR of £50)         
                     
               
TOTAL WINS   15             
               
LOSSES   1            
               
Win/Lose ratio   15   to   1   


Managed to hit a loss already but I'm not worried. Disappointed yes but I know that's a blip. I'll keep posting a weekly update in this thread if it's ok with you lot  O0

that's dangerous marty mainly when playing 2 dozens to win just 1 unit.. think about it, and believe me you will hit that blackhole often!
just an advice for you, if you insist of playing CODE4, use another progression something like this :
start with 1u each , play the whole line stop when you are in +1 : 1-1 1-1 1-1 1-1
in loss increase you bet and repeat step 1. etc..

BUT, if you just look at JL stats and your stats are similar in %. you win 8 first step the usually you will win half of that in next step
which sould be around 4. look at JLs stats back to see what I mean.
therfore, its better for you to play FOR match, only one DZ or one CL, you will save yourself from that dangerous Marty.

PS: I posted back to JL the impact of the variable: STARTING POINT
here it is if you missed its definition, it may give you an idea:
-------------------------------
Lets divide your game (turbo mode as example, You can applicate it to any mode) in Time-Space domain:
-Time domain: lets T1 T2 T3... Tn represent the time of n successive spins, in between there is a DELTA T = T(p)-T(p+q) where things goes wrong it might be at any length, you just sometime happend that you entred the game ( for 1 or 2 bets) just before Tp or after DELTA+ Tp. but sooner or later you would catch it.
-Space domain: this another point which nobody here mentioned : the STARTING POINT, meaning this :
the marquee number were for example :
4   
10   
27
9
12
19
28
21
5

if you entred the game at number 4 : your code 4 would be
1A3C
1A3C
which is obviously a  losing starting point.
but if your starting point was next number which is 10  your code would be totaly different :
1c1c
2a2b
which is totaly a winning STRATING POINT. 

------------------------
cheers
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on Jun 26, 06:56 PM 2012
Update

CODE 4               
1-1, 3-3, 9-9 (1 zero)   is 27 units           
               
wins on first   39           
wins on second   16           
wins on third   7           
               
               
CURRENT BANKROLL    £85    (starting BR of £50)         
                     
               
TOTAL WINS   62             
               
LOSSES   1           
               
Win/Lose ratio   62   to   1 
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: GLC on Jun 26, 07:45 PM 2012
Quote from: subby on Jun 26, 06:56 PM 2012
Update

CODE 4               
1-1, 3-3, 9-9 (1 zero)   is 27 units           
               
wins on first   39           
wins on second   16           
wins on third   7           
               
               
CURRENT BANKROLL    £85    (starting BR of £50)         
                     
               
TOTAL WINS   62             
               
LOSSES   1           
               
Win/Lose ratio   62   to   1

Seems like a reasonable amount to risk testing out Code 4.  There's a chance you may lose it all, but there's also a chance you might continue to win more and more.  We're rooting for the latter.

Thanks for keeping us up to date on your progress.

GLC
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Jun 30, 11:48 PM 2012
Its my take on hit n run philosophy playing Code 4 by John.


"  RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 16/9/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 1,121

TOTAL GAMES WON 1,120

TOTAL GAMES LOST 1

STRIKERATE 1,120/1

BALANCE 2,080 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 578

STEP 2 WINS 332

STEP 3 WINS 184

STEP 4 WINS 26---LOSSES 1

The winning goes on with this marvel. As I continue to apply the 2 by 2 play. But record 5 games per session. Total losses within that 5 game record per session remain at 12. I will continue to update CODE 4, every 100--150 games played."

Lets analyze d numbers. John plays 4 games a day (2x2) but records 10 games (2x5)  In his live play of 4 games he has only 1 L but in 6 games he records he has 11 L. So this is his argument about why hit n run works.  ;D I would call it an almost perfect entry point deciding when 2 enter a game. I bet that f he decided 2 play just 2x1 games a day d single loss would be in d games he just recorded. I guess i would be that less fortunate dude who would play d games he skipped n caught all d losses.  O0 And still it would be only 12 L's in around 1700 games.
Why bother with hit n run John?  Even played 2x5 games a day yr strike rate would be around 230/1?  I would love 2 have such stats.

Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on Jul 04, 08:37 AM 2012
Robeen when did you start playing it? How long has it taken you to get to this point?


Update

CODE 4               
1-1, 3-3, 9-9 (1 zero)   is 27 units           
               
wins on first   48           
wins on second   27           
wins on third   11           
               
               
CURRENT BANKROLL    £108    (starting BR of £50)         
                     
               
TOTAL WINS   86             
               
LOSSES   1           
               
Win/Lose ratio   86   to   1
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Jul 04, 11:01 AM 2012
Quote from: subby on Jul 04, 08:37 AM 2012
Robeen when did you start playing it? How long has it taken you to get to this point?


Update

CODE 4               
1-1, 3-3, 9-9 (1 zero)   is 27 units           
               
wins on first   48           
wins on second   27           
wins on third   11           
               
               
CURRENT BANKROLL    £108    (starting BR of £50)         
                     
               
TOTAL WINS   86             
               
LOSSES   1           
               
Win/Lose ratio   86   to   1

Hola Subby

I dont play any Dozens or Columns methods period or EC's. I just dont like winning ratio n risking 80u 2 win 1u f u use 1,3,9,27 progression. I just posted my opinion about hit n run philosophy playing Code 4 JL's way.  Happy that u r few units ahead after 86 games.


Regards
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on Jul 16, 02:45 PM 2012
Had a vets bill so withdrew my money to pay the bill :/

From my initial deposit I was up 102 units (1=£1) so all in all not too bad. Bit of effort for the money though but happy enough. I'll need to get back when I have a suitable BR again to start from teh beginning.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: lorna dune on Jul 16, 05:51 PM 2012
Shane! Shane! Come back Samste... Shane!  I don't post much because I don't have anything to add but I do like Sam and GLC and all the rest of this great cast of characters on this site, this site is a "gem" with good people giving of their knowlege, all of us trying to beat the game. I was stunned when I found the old VLS years ago I thought I was the only weirdo that sleeps roulette. The negativity is priceless entertainment, how can you yell at somebody who claims he is trying to make you money, take it or leave it who cares I'm 59 I got 20 quality years left(maybe?) If I want to waste them trying to beat roulette who the f in cares! Your wife? if she has'nt left you already because of roulette, well she should have because you will be pennyless.
"I play Goldsten progression it's fairly solid." (define fairly) I love all the systems and these great outside the box ideas  I would much rather read these threads than watch TV.  I so look forward to reading new systems and ideas I just want to say thanks for your generousity. I hope to be able to add something "system" in the future as I too am always trying to beat the game.  Thanks for listening. lorna dunne
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: GLC on Jul 16, 10:15 PM 2012
Lorna Dune,  You're 59 and you love roulette.  I know you've got something to share with us.  It could be the piece that brings it all together.  Cough it up mate!

GLC
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: GLC on Jul 16, 10:31 PM 2012
Quote from: lorna dune on Jul 16, 05:51 PM 2012
"I play Goldsten progression it's fairly solid."

Maybe you could elaborate on this Goldsten progression.  I can't say that I've heard of it before.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Jul 16, 10:53 PM 2012
Quote from: GLC on Jul 16, 10:31 PM 2012

Maybe you could elaborate on this Goldsten progression.  I can't say that I've heard of it before.

I think he meant Goldstein progression on Dozens or Columns

link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=1522.0 (link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=1522.0)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on Sep 01, 06:35 PM 2012
John L...are you still playing with this? I am and it's still good. Have you tweaked it any or still using the default rules for this method. I'm up 5 units tonight and withdrew my winnings....in and out sharpish :)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: subby on Sep 07, 06:08 PM 2012
Deposited 27 today to cover a session playing...1-1, 3-3, 9-9 (and 1 on green zero when hitting 9-9) = 27

Played paddypower and played £1 units on these tables

airball for 2 wins
sporting for 2 wins
london for 2 wins

then logged out taking my £6 profits as a withdrawal :)

every little helps ;)
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Sep 29, 10:45 AM 2012
Quote from: subby on Sep 07, 06:08 PM 2012
Deposited 27 today to cover a session playing...1-1, 3-3, 9-9 (and 1 on green zero when hitting 9-9) = 27

Played paddypower and played £1 units on these tables

airball for 2 wins
sporting for 2 wins
london for 2 wins

then logged out taking my £6 profits as a withdrawal :)

every little helps ;)
I like your solid discipline Subby. You like Chauncy47 and a few others are made of the right stuff to beat this game. Well its long overdue an update. So my next post here will bring all up to date with my play on CODE 4.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Sep 29, 11:07 AM 2012
RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 29/09/12

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 6,000

TOTAL GAMES WON 5,973

TOTAL GAMES LOST 27

STRIKERATE APPROX 221/1

BALANCE 7,456 POINTS PLUS

CODE 4 took a hammering over the summer period. And showed the worst flow of results since I started playing it. Delivering 12 losses over the last 1,500 games played. And a strikerate of 124/1 over that sample. HOWEVER. The question I always ask myself is, am I making profit or not? And the anwser is YES. Its just dropped off over the last 1,500 games. I have cut down to 5--10 games average a day and that has taken the strikerate back up. My current winning streak as a result is 246. I only drop a method IF it puts me over 500 points in the red. And CODE 4 has never lost me money. And although the strikrate seems to rise and fall its always been in profit.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: TwoCatSam on Sep 30, 06:29 PM 2012
John

You must understand why there are "doubting Thomases" among us.  When you say you have a hit rate of 221/1 red flags go up.  Why?  Because that is impossible!

I understand you mean you have won progressions of what? 1 23 9 27? and still that defies mathematics and logic.  In the real world, we cannot defy logic and math. 

So, John, my hat's off to you.  You seem to have--to borrow a phrase--"Gone where no man has gone before."

Samster
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Oct 02, 06:55 PM 2012
Quote from: TwoCatSam on Sep 30, 06:29 PM 2012
John

You must understand why there are "doubting Thomases" among us.  When you say you have a hit rate of 221/1 red flags go up.  Why?  Because that is impossible!

I understand you mean you have won progressions of what? 1 23 9 27? and still that defies mathematics and logic.  In the real world, we cannot defy logic and math. 

So, John, my hat's off to you.  You seem to have--to borrow a phrase--"Gone where no man has gone before."

Samster
Sam its not impossible when you play Hit and Run. 221/1 is nothing. I have a method pushing 1000/0 I am now at 970 no loss. That would seem impossible. But again its happenned. Would I have attained those numbers if I sat there and played all day? Of course not. Code 4 hasnt performed that well over the last 3 months Sam. And the strikerate fell to 124/1 over that period. But its still profit anyway you look at it. And thats the name of the game. I had a real battle with BV tonight. Spent hours on there trying out different ideas including the magnificent 7. And I struggled. I had to revert back to my regular methods and pulled myself back up from a 300 point deficit to finish the night with a modest 12 point gain. My worst result in recent times. BUT, still a profit and a step in the right direction.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Robeenhuut on Oct 03, 04:12 AM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on Oct 02, 06:55 PM 2012
Sam its not impossible when you play Hit and Run. 221/1 is nothing. I have a method pushing 1000/0 I am now at 970 no loss. That would seem impossible. But again its happenned. Would I have attained those numbers if I sat there and played all day? Of course not. Code 4 hasn't performed that well over the last 3 months Sam. And the strikerate fell to 124/1 over that period. But its still profit anyway you look at it. And that's the name of the game. I had a real battle with BV tonight. Spent hours on there trying out different ideas including the magnificent 7. And I struggled. I had to revert back to my regular methods and pulled myself back up from a 300 point deficit to finish the night with a modest 12 point gain. My worst result in recent times. BUT, still a profit and a step in the right direction.

Maybe we should start playing any 2/3 chance method with 1,3,9,27 progression but just of course few games a day?  Seriously. Recently there is a lots of activity here regarding dozens bet but it ends usually with numerous tweaks. And i used to be a complete non-believer in hit and run approach.  ;D And 1,3,9,27 looks very scary. But lets face it - any longer double dozen progression could get you in the hole pretty quickly.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Turner on Oct 03, 06:22 AM 2012
Quote from: Johnlegend on Oct 02, 06:55 PM 2012
Sam its not impossible when you play Hit and Run. 221/1 is nothing. I have a method pushing 1000/0 I am now at 970 no loss. That would seem impossible. But again its happenned. Would I have attained those numbers if I sat there and played all day? Of course not. Code 4 hasn't performed that well over the last 3 months Sam. And the strikerate fell to 124/1 over that period. But its still profit anyway you look at it. And that's the name of the game. I had a real battle with BV tonight. Spent hours on there trying out different ideas including the magnificent 7. And I struggled. I had to revert back to my regular methods and pulled myself back up from a 300 point deficit to finish the night with a modest 12 point gain. My worst result in recent times. BUT, still a profit and a step in the right direction.
John
If you have a system thats never lost, why are you trying magnificent7 ?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Ralph on Oct 03, 08:08 AM 2012
If I lose using M7 it is not 350, rather 1300. A good session can profit up over 1000.
350 is a drawdown I have often. A few hits takes it back as a hit on a number can gain more than 100.

A win target of 1000 units is realistic for a days play, 3000 units is a bankroll which will do.

Some do not like methods with not strict rules, and M7 put some decissions on the player,
it is open, you read the game, stop earlier the session, start over or quit, sometimes push it
to the limit and go for bigger wins.

I find 2 doz bet more risky,  betting 1,3,9,27,81 x2 and go for 1 chip. You must here have a very, very high strike rate close to 99,99999%, and even then I think it is slow.

A bet which return less than the bet I do not think will work for me.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Johnlegend on Oct 03, 08:53 AM 2012
Quote from: Ralph on Oct 03, 08:08 AM 2012
If I lose using M7 it is not 350, rather 1300. A good session can profit up over 1000.
350 is a drawdown I have often. A few hits takes it back as a hit on a number can gain more than 100.

A win target of 1000 units is realistic for a days play, 3000 units is a bankroll which will do.

Some do not like methods with not strict rules, and M7 put some decissions on the player,
it is open, you read the game, stop earlier the session, start over or quit, sometimes push it
to the limit and go for bigger wins.

I find 2 doz bet more risky,  betting 1,3,9,27,81 x2 and go for 1 chip. You must here have a very, very high strike rate close to 99,99999%, and even then I think it is slow.

A bet which return less than the bet I do not think will work for me.
You are right Ralph the drawdown is heavy but the reward can be great. Im used to less nerve testing experiences in recent times. Regarding risking 80 to win 1. Doesn't seem too appealing until you get way ahead. Once you have won several progressions its a different feeling. Tomorrow I will break the 1000 straight wins barrier. HOPEFULLY!!!!
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: CocaVillaLaNoche on Apr 07, 06:18 PM 2015
HI JL,
compiments for your hard work!
I noticed 1 thing. You played 4500 games where you get a win in the 1st step 2107 times. This means that if I play the same system BUT AGAINST your bet selection (say if you have to play doz 1 and 3 instead I bet doz 2) I win 2393 times (4500-2107) = +4786 units flat betting (around 1 unit per game) at really no risk and this just betting the 1st step.
What do you think?  8)

Quote from: Johnlegend on May 16, 01:32 PM 2012
Yes that is interesting isnt it. Why didn't I think of that? LoL The thing is you need to play a large number of games to see that clearly. I have had sessions in a calendar day where out of the 20 games played 14 or more won on the first step sometimes 5 or 6 games in a row. It swings and roundabouts. But your reverse idea flat betting is indeed worth investigating.
Over the long haul it may be a grail a pure grail as it meets all the requirments of the purists. Hmmm food for thought. The Wolfat commeth. Great observation.

This made me laugh!
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: TwoCatSam on Apr 08, 12:09 AM 2015
I sure miss ol' John.  He was a world-class bloviator.  Was going to show me how to win enough to put my grandson through college.  Well, the young man has graduated.  No help from ol' John.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: CocaVillaLaNoche on Apr 08, 03:19 AM 2015
I read the whole topic.
Played exactly the way he did.
2 by 2, 10 games a day on different wheels.
He says he has a strike rate of 1/300.
Ridiculous
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: nottophammer on Apr 08, 06:04 AM 2015
with 60 pages to look at,was +1/-1 ever used
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: SamNL on Apr 08, 06:23 AM 2015
Quote from: nottophammer on Apr 08, 06:04 AM 2015
with 60 pages to look at,was +1/-1 ever used
No, only a Marty has been used with this.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Rewster88 on Apr 08, 07:13 AM 2015
I think that code 4 was on the bot/system tester program dont know the name anymore. But i remember no system past 2000 spins in plus.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: nottophammer on Apr 08, 05:51 PM 2015
Sam

is it worth a look +1/-1,

Title: Nostalgia
Post by: bleep24 on Dec 19, 04:01 AM 2017
I have said it before and I will say it again.  Look at old systems before looking at new.  There are some nuggets amongst them.  I had completely forgotten about CODE 4 but reminded in a recent posting.  CODE 4 (and its spin offs   -  haha) are some very powerful methods (ie: winning ones)

I play my own twist (though given the idea in   CODE 4 postings)   I am playing using dozens/columns.  This way works because of the very high hit rate on 1st spin.   I am only betting once (against previous dozen in matrix line DIRECTLY above) win or lose virtual bet next 3 spins.  Progression   1 1  3 3  9 9 etc. or whatever.
Very little waiting or tracking.  You could play one of the other lines at.the same time but keep separate banks  If you did it would be:  (say that you chose spin 3. Also dozens.   This is vertical betting.    2 separate series of bets if you want more opportunities to play (and have a bigger bank)      This has worked up to now on limited testing.
Bet    No Bet     Bet    No Bet

Good luck,     Brian         


Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: bleep24 on Dec 19, 04:51 AM 2017
Also to look at is a post by Atlantis in code 4.  This is played on EC`s.   Progression is not steep (or you could use your own favourite one)
As in my last post I am playing vertically.     (on 2 choices)  so    BET    NO BET   BET    NO BET    I am playing for repeaters.

The brave could play all 4 (separate banks)       
Looks very promising.
Brian
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: nottophammer on Dec 19, 10:53 AM 2017
Bleep just now on MPR
22,07,36,17
25,25,11,06
11,03,09,25
21,10,30,29
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 19, 01:24 PM 2017
Quote from: nottophammer on Dec 19, 10:53 AM 2017
Bleep just now on MPR
22,07,36,17
25,25,11,06
11,03,09,25
21,10,30,29

These systems inspired by John Legend are among the best ive ever seen. I have been playing his pattern breaker for the last 3 months with some excellent results. This is a summary of how its gone for me so far.

GAMES PLAYED 350
GAMES WON 323
GAMES LOST 27

STARTING BANK 200
CURRENT BANK 361

LONGEST WINNING STREAK 25 GAMES
LONGEST LOSING STREAK 1

LONGEST WINNING STREAK FOR THE FIRST GAME OF THE DAY. 36 GAMES.

There alot of potential here with this simple but effective system. Only exposing 7 units a game. I havent lost two games in a row ever.

And the first game I play has the best performance rate. Producing many long winning streaks. 36 being the best so far.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: bleep24 on Dec 19, 02:58 PM 2017
Hi Notto,
Do not know why you have posted those few results.   Is it to do with current systems?      (Dozens/columns - EC`s)

Just to state how perverse some results can be.  I looked at Hermes 6 x 6 D/S method.  He said it had not lost in 9 months and I spun a first 18 numbers and lo and behold, a loss.

Good luck everyone and a enjoyable Christmas to you,
Brian
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: bleep24 on Dec 19, 03:08 PM 2017
Hi Sentinel,
Good news.  Well done on those results.  Just confirms my faith in both methods.  I do prefer EC`s as progression is not as heavy and there are lots of different ones that can be applied to this.

This time next year Rodney we`ll all be millionaires!!!   (If you have not seen UK TV programme you will not understand this)

Just been in USA for nearly 5 weeks and TV there is mainly dross, and adverts every 10 minutes.   aargh!!!!

Brian 
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 19, 11:20 PM 2017
Quote from: bleep24 on Dec 19, 03:08 PM 2017
Hi Sentinel,
Good news.  Well done on those results.  Just confirms my faith in both methods.  I do prefer EC`s as progression is not as heavy and there are lots of different ones that can be applied to this.

This time next year Rodney we`ll all be millionaires!!!   (If you have not seen UK TV programme you will not understand this)

Just been in USA for nearly 5 weeks and TV there is mainly dross, and adverts every 10 minutes.   aargh!!!!

Brian
Hi bleep24

Lol yes I know of fools & horses. Im from Devon in the UK. I agree the smaller risk makes it an attractive option. And every time I lose. I just double stakes on the very next game. For a faster recovery. I only play red and black which seems to be very stable. Might be because of the layout on the wheel. CODE 4 looks good. And I may give it a try if my bank gets to around 500.

The progression is quite heavy. But if it makes profit who can argue?..
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: valvo on Dec 21, 07:27 AM 2017
Hi Sentinel, are you playing that the 8th pattern will appear? If not which PB are you playing?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 21, 01:21 PM 2017
Quote from: valvo on Dec 21, 07:27 AM 2017
Hi Sentinel, are you playing that the 8th pattern will appear? If not which PB are you playing?
Hi Valvo

No im playing against the 8th pattern appearing as in the original system.

If I was betting for the pattern I would have lost a lot. Right now my first bet of the day has gone 26 days no loss.

Since I started playing in September. Ive had a streak of 36 days without losing the first game.

I typically play 5 games most days. And most of my losses come on the 3--5 games. Thats something to think about.

Ive tried alot of systems in my time. And for just 7 units at risk. Never seen anything as good as pattern breaker.

Im 345 and 28 in wins and losses as I write this. This system is powerful. And a cheap buy in.

I cannot see this ever going to negative numbers. I already have over 24 times my standard progression. This ones a winner for sure.

That JL was a clever dude.j
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: valvo on Dec 21, 01:47 PM 2017
If you lose do you go into recovery or stay at the 1 2 4 ?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 21, 02:19 PM 2017
Quote from: valvo on Dec 21, 01:47 PM 2017
If you lose do you go into recovery or stay at the 1 2 4 ?
Hi again valvo. What I do is double stakes for 1 game only straight after a loss. Ive never lost two straight games. Im in no doubt it will happen one day. But im 28/0 for double losses so far.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: valvo on Dec 21, 02:39 PM 2017
Thanks Sentinel, I do appreciate your answers. I think this is the last. You go into a bricks and mortar track a table play one session then move on to another table?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 21, 02:53 PM 2017
Quote from: valvo on Dec 21, 02:39 PM 2017
Thanks Sentinel, I do appreciate your answers. I think this is the last. You go into a bricks and mortar track a table play one session then move on to another table?
No lol never been in a real casino. I have 6 online accounts. I just flit between one and the other. Dont play more than 2 games a day on any one account.

They dont like you winning too much. Got to be low key. I lose on all accounts at some point. And they like seeing you go backwards. Then I win on the other accounts and withdraw my winnings straight away. So it doesnt look like im winning too much.

One day I might try a real casino. Ive even tried PB on rng machines inside english bookmakers. Just one game here and there. And have won.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: valvo on Dec 21, 03:29 PM 2017
I lied, I have 2 more.

Do you only use H L?

Say you get

HLH
LHL
HLH

That would be pattern 1 2 1 then

HHH pattern 3

You number the pattern as it comes out wanting for the 7 th when it forms you bet the next 3 won't be the 8 th which has not yet appeared?

Let me know if I'm on track.

I think I'll have it after this.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: bleep24 on Dec 21, 03:51 PM 2017
I have thrown  the baby, the bath and water out and gone back to the beginning.

I am now playing a 4 wide matrix on Red/Black.   Betting against line directly above.  Using  1  2  3  5  8  etc.  Restart anywhere after a win.
R B B R                                - --- - -
R B R R                                1L  2L  3W  2L
R R B R                                3L  5W 2W  1L
B R B B                                2W 1L  2L  3W
R B R  R                               2W 1W 1W 1W

Plus 8 units.  This has a high win rate.  You could use +1/-1 or a level type of progression or whatever.
Brian
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: bleep24 on Dec 21, 04:13 PM 2017
RED/BLACK 4 WIDE MATRIX METHOD

WWLLLWWLWWLLLWWLWWLLWWWLWWLWLW  covering 30 spins

+14 Units.   Live French table.         1 2 3 5 8 etc. progression       Between 1 and 4 losses in a chain are usual.

+1/-1 or a level type progression could also be used.      Looks promising.  It is 50/50 chance betting.

Brian
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 21, 05:09 PM 2017
Quote from: valvo on Dec 21, 03:29 PM 2017
I lied, I have 2 more.

Do you only use H L?

Say you get

HLH
LHL
HLH

That would be pattern 1 2 1 then

HHH pattern 3

You number the pattern as it comes out wanting for the 7 th when it forms you bet the next 3 won't be the 8 th which has not yet appeared?

Let me know if I'm on track.

I think I'll have it after this.
Hi Valvo

I never bet on anything but red or black. I paper tested PB for a month before I ever used real money. RED AND BLACK. Out perforned the other two ECs. I think the reason may be the layout on the wheel.

So yes as in this example

RRR1
RRB--Bet BBR 1-2-4 STOP at a win...
RBB2
RBR4
BBB3
BBR6
BRR8
BRB--7
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 21, 05:25 PM 2017
Quote from: sentinel3 on Dec 21, 05:09 PM 2017
Hi Valvo

I never bet on anything but red or black. I paper tested PB for a month before I ever used real money. RED AND BLACK. Out perforned the other two ECs. I think the reason may be the layout on the wheel.

So yes as in this example

RRR1
RRB--Bet BBR 1-2-4 STOP at a win...
RBB2
RBR4
BBB3
BBR6
BRR8
BRB--7
Sorry BRR should have been the 5th pattern to form. Im typing this without me glasses.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: valvo on Dec 21, 06:49 PM 2017
Hi Sentinel, I'm a little lost, why did you bet after 3 decisions? I thought you wait for the 7 patterns to form which could take a while because if you have 9 reds in a row that would be

RRR patern 1
RRR patern 1
RRR patern 1
Still 6 patterns to form which will make 7 patterns formed.

Once all 7 patterns have appeared you bet against the 8th pattern, is this correct?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 21, 11:26 PM 2017
Quote from: valvo on Dec 21, 06:49 PM 2017
Hi Sentinel, I'm a little lost, why did you bet after 3 decisions? I thought you wait for the 7 patterns to form which could take a while because if you have 9 reds in a row that would be

RRR patern 1
RRR patern 1
RRR patern 1
Still 6 patterns to form which will make 7 patterns formed.

Once all 7 patterns have appeared you bet against the 8th pattern, is this correct?
Hi Valvo

Yes its as you say. I just numbered the patterns as an example of the order they might form in. Of course there can be multiple repeats of patterns that have already formed.

Ive seen 7 patterns form in 27 spins in one game. Then take over 60 spins to form in another game. Most of the time the 7th pattern forms inside 50 spins from the start of the game.

Just played my first game of the day on ladbrokes. And now have a streak of 27 wins in a row for the first game of the day. Its going well...
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: valvo on Dec 22, 12:49 AM 2017
After a win you move to another table and start tracking again?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 22, 01:40 PM 2017
Quote from: valvo on Dec 22, 12:49 AM 2017
After a win you move to another table and start tracking again?
Hi Valvo. No as I said I play online. I play anything from 5 to 10 games a day. Depending on how much time I have.

My first game is always before 6am uk time. If I win. I log out immediately go back to bed. And later play another game on another site. If I lose I immediately start the recovery process. Play another game and treble stakes if its the first game of the day.

Double stakes if its later in the day. That first game has only lost 4 times in 94 days. I really have faith in it.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: valvo on Dec 22, 02:51 PM 2017
Thanks Sentinel, sorry to be a pain I think this is my last question, when you lose do you start tracking with complete new data which may take another 30 to 50 spins?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: valvo on Dec 22, 03:14 PM 2017
Or in other words every game you play is a brand new set of numbers?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 22, 04:01 PM 2017
Quote from: valvo on Dec 22, 02:51 PM 2017
Thanks Sentinel, sorry to be a pain I think this is my last question, when you lose do you start tracking with complete new data which may take another 30 to 50 spins?
Yes I start fresh. Theres an element luck, timing with this pattern breaker. The odds say 7/1. In reality the less you play the higher those odds be going.

More like 15/1. Thats what makes this system a keeper for me.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: valvo on Dec 22, 04:43 PM 2017
Thanks so much for answering all my questions, I wanted to get exactly what you do to the letter. I will test, start playing in due course and return here with my results. Have a great Christmas and a great 2018.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 22, 04:48 PM 2017
Quote from: valvo on Dec 22, 04:43 PM 2017
Thanks so much for answering all my questions, I wanted to get exactly what you do to the letter. I will test, start playing in due course and return here with my results. Have a great Christmas and a great 2018.
Thanks Valvo,

You too. I think 2018 will be a great year. My bankroll is growing by the week. I dream of doing this full time in the future. If it keeps performing anywhere as good as it has. It will pay my bills by summer 2018.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 22, 04:56 PM 2017
Quote from: valvo on Dec 22, 04:43 PM 2017
Thanks so much for answering all my questions, I wanted to get exactly what you do to the letter. I will test, start playing in due course and return here with my results. Have a great Christmas and a great 2018.
Thanks Valvo,

You too. I think 2018 will be a great year. My bankroll is growing by the week. I dream of doing this full time in the future. If it keeps performing anywhere as good as it has. It will pay my bills by summer 2018.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Tekunda on Dec 24, 08:39 PM 2017
Quote from: sentinel3 on Dec 22, 04:48 PM 2017
Thanks Valvo,

You too. I think 2018 will be a great year. My bankroll is growing by the week. I dream of doing this full time in the future. If it keeps performing anywhere as good as it has. It will pay my bills by summer 2018.

Sentinel, may I chime in with one question please?
Say you found your pattern to play against, so you start betting and you win your first game. (using  the progression)

Do you start looking for a new pattern after the first win, which would mean charting another 50 or more games until the new pattern emerges?
Or do you keep on playing after a win, using the very first pattern to betted against?

Wouldn't logic dictate that once a pattern has won it has been used up and in order to continue, you would need to chart another 50 or so games until a new winning pattern emerges? And the same procedures for the third set.
Which has would mean that for three wins, you would need to chart 150 or more games?
Or, do you keep on using the first emerging pattern and keep playing against this pattern until you have your three winners or more?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on Dec 24, 08:51 PM 2017
@Code 4 players:  Here is a tracker that has Code Four
Just follow when it tells you when to (or not to bet)

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 25, 01:29 AM 2017
Quote from: Tekunda on Dec 24, 08:39 PM 2017
Sentinel, may I chime in with one question please?
Say you found your pattern to play against, so you start betting and you win your first game. (using  the progression)

Do you start looking for a new pattern after the first win, which would mean charting another 50 or more games until the new pattern emerges?
Or do you keep on playing after a win, using the very first pattern to betted against?

Wouldn't logic dictate that once a pattern has won it has been used up and in order to continue, you would need to chart another 50 or so games until a new winning pattern emerges? And the same procedures for the third set.
Which has would mean that for three wins, you would need to chart 150 or more games?
Or, do you keep on using the first emerging pattern and keep playing against this pattern until you have your three winners or more?
Hi Tekunda

Once I win a game im out of there. I play online and have several accounts. So I log out. Go to another account. Write down the 12 numbers on the number board.

Which usually give me 3 or 4 of my 8 patterns straight off. Then take it from there. Its worked very well so far. Im winning 10 to 11 games to everyone I lose.

I need 7 wins to match one loss. So its even making a profit at the moment. If I never increase how much I bet on a game.

At just 7 units a game I like this alot. That CODE 4 looks good. But I havent considered trying it yet. Because 80 units is alot to risk on a game.

I will only try it when ive made over 500 units of profit from the pattern breaker.

Im very happy with this system.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Tekunda on Dec 25, 07:09 AM 2017
Quote from: sentinel3 on Dec 25, 01:29 AM 2017
Hi Tekunda

Once I win a game im out of there. I play online and have several accounts. So I log out. Go to another account. Write down the 12 numbers on the number board.

Which usually give me 3 or 4 of my 8 patterns straight off. Then take it from there. Its worked very well so far. Im winning 10 to 11 games to everyone I lose.

I need 7 wins to match one loss. So its even making a profit at the moment. If I never increase how much I bet on a game.

At just 7 units a game I like this alot. That CODE 4 looks good. But I havent considered trying it yet. Because 80 units is alot to risk on a game.

I will only try it when ive made over 500 units of profit from the pattern breaker.

Im very happy with this system.

Sorry to trouble you again. But I meant the following:
After charting you eventually get your pattern to bet against.
Say RBB is the pattern you bet against. So you start your progression and you win at the second level. So you made 1 chip, if your progression is 1-2-4.
But one chip profit is not really a lot.
So do you know if the original system dictates to continue with the first pattern in order to make more profit, or is the pattern used up and you need to chart for a new pattern?
Because John Legend mentioned somewhere (if I am not mistaken) that he had up to a hundred continuous wins. But that would mean he kept using the same pattern to bet against over and over again.
I understand that you have up to 10 online accounts, so here you can use a new pattern with every account.
But my question is was concerning a b&m casino. How do you continue in a b&m casino if you find your pattern and successfully play against it?
Find a new pattern (which is time consuming) or use the old pattern for three or four more games?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 25, 12:40 PM 2017
Quote from: Tekunda on Dec 25, 07:09 AM 2017
Sorry to trouble you again. But I meant the following:
After charting you eventually get your pattern to bet against.
Say RBB is the pattern you bet against. So you start your progression and you win at the second level. So you made 1 chip, if your progression is 1-2-4.
But one chip profit is not really a lot.
So do you know if the original system dictates to continue with the first pattern in order to make more profit, or is the pattern used up and you need to chart for a new pattern?
Because John Legend mentioned somewhere (if I am not mistaken) that he had up to a hundred continuous wins. But that would mean he kept using the same pattern to bet against over and over again.
I understand that you have up to 10 online accounts, so here you can use a new pattern with every account.
But my question is was concerning a b&m casino. How do you continue in a b&m casino if you find your pattern and successfully play against it?
Find a new pattern (which is time consuming) or use the old pattern for three or four more games?

Hi Tekunda,

Once I have a win on steps 1 to 3 thats it game over.

If im to understand right JL meant he had put together a winning streak over a 100 games. Thats amazing if he was being honest.

Right now after 400 games played I have had a winning streak of 25 games in a row. And a first game of the day streak of 36. And im currently on a first game of the day streak of 29 days.

So long streaks can definately happen with this system. If I have my way in the future. I would play just one game a day. But bet big. So strong is that first game of the day.

In 98 days I have only lost it 4 times. Thats fantastic.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Tekunda on Dec 25, 02:33 PM 2017
Quote from: sentinel3 on Dec 25, 12:40 PM 2017
Hi Tekunda,

Once I have a win on steps 1 to 3 thats it game over.



Until here I understand. But my question is, what happens after the first game is game over?
Do chart again 50 or more games until a new pattern emerges, or do you keep using the first pattern for the following games until satisfied with your winnings?
So in other words, after the first win, keep using the same pattern over and over, or keep searching a new pattern after each win?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 25, 02:51 PM 2017
Quote from: Tekunda on Dec 25, 02:33 PM 2017
Until here I understand. But my question is, what happens after the first game is game over?
Do chart again 50 or more games until a new pattern emerges, or do you keep using the first pattern for the following games until satisfied with your winnings?
So in other words, after the first win, keep using the same pattern over and over, or keep searching a new pattern after each win?
No after a win or loss. I close down. Go to another site and play a completely fresh game. I do this 5 to 10 times a day.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Tekunda on Dec 25, 07:39 PM 2017
Quote from: sentinel3 on Dec 25, 02:51 PM 2017
No after a win or loss. I close down. Go to another site and play a completely fresh game. I do this 5 to 10 times a day.

I get it now. But any idea how to play in a brick and mortar casino? Keep using the same patter, or chart a new pattern every time after a win, which would of course be very time consuming?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 25, 09:23 PM 2017
Quote from: Tekunda on Dec 25, 07:39 PM 2017
I get it now. But any idea how to play in a brick and mortar casino? Keep using the same patter, or chart a new pattern every time after a win, which would of course be very time consuming?
In a real casino, it would be harder to get more than 2 or three games of pattern breaker in an evening. So you would have to bet bigger. And maybe risk getting multiple winners out of the same game. I wouldnt risk more than 2 per fresh game though.

Most of the 400 odd games ive now played have produced at least two winners per game. Having a look through my records.

351 of my 367 wins have produced at least two consecutive wins in a game. I Dont know the longest because I close down after a few winners. But there must be times when it takes ages to close out a game. And you get 10 plus winners from a single game.

Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Tekunda on Dec 26, 05:28 AM 2017
Quote from: sentinel3 on Dec 25, 09:23 PM 2017

Most of the 400 odd games ive now played have produced at least two winners per game. Having a look through my records.



Dear Sentinel, forgive me please for asking for clarification again, but I don't understand above sentence.
I thought you said that after your first win, you switch your account and start a new game. How then can you produce two winners per game?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: sentinel3 on Dec 26, 11:20 AM 2017
Quote from: Tekunda on Dec 26, 05:28 AM 2017
Dear Sentinel, forgive me please for asking for clarification again, but I don't understand above sentence.
I thought you said that after your first win, you switch your account and start a new game. How then can you produce two winners per game?
I dont. I only bet for one win but record another 9 spins to see what happens. And most of the time the 8th pattern doesnt form until the 4th attempt. Or longer.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Tekunda on Dec 27, 03:35 PM 2017
Quote from: sentinel3 on Dec 26, 11:20 AM 2017
I dont. I only bet for one win but record another 9 spins to see what happens. And most of the time the 8th pattern doesnt form until the 4th attempt. Or longer.

Thanks for taking the time to answer my questions. I have a better idea now, how you play the game.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Viking64 on Jan 22, 02:42 AM 2018
New to the party but investigating  systems for a while.
I found that using flat bets only, betting on all four spins (numbers 13,14,15,16) yielded better profit than dropping out after a winning spin. Marty frightens me so flat betting is my comfort zone.
Thoughts from you experienced folk?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Gerard711 on Mar 28, 05:40 AM 2018
Quote from: sentinel3 on Dec 22, 04:48 PM 2017
Thanks Valvo,

You too. I think 2018 will be a great year. My bankroll is growing by the week. I dream of doing this full time in the future. If it keeps performing anywhere as good as it has. It will pay my bills by summer 2018.

I thought you were JL and have been playing for 11 years ,fess up
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Winner on Mar 28, 09:29 AM 2018
Quote from: Gerard711 on Mar 28, 05:40 AM 2018
I thought you were JL and have been playing for 11 years ,fess up
11 years and he just starting to want to pay his bills now . Don't get it but what do I know.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Gerard711 on Mar 28, 09:34 PM 2018
Quote from: sentinel3 on Dec 19, 01:24 PM 2017
These systems inspired by John Legend are among the best ive ever seen. I have been playing his pattern breaker for the last 3 months with some excellent results. This is a summary of how its gone for me so far.

GAMES PLAYED 350
GAMES WON 323
GAMES LOST 27

STARTING BANK 200
CURRENT BANK 361

LONGEST WINNING STREAK 25 GAMES
LONGEST LOSING STREAK 1

LONGEST WINNING STREAK FOR THE FIRST GAME OF THE DAY. 36 GAMES.

There alot of potential here with this simple but effective system. Only exposing 7 units a game. I havent lost two games in a row ever.

And the first game I play has the best performance rate. Producing many long winning streaks. 36 being the best so far.


I thought you were John Legend ????????
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: DoctorSudoku on Mar 28, 11:42 PM 2018
Quote from: Gerard711 on Mar 28, 09:34 PM 2018

I thought you were John Legend ????????


An FYI for you:
When he wrote the post in question, he was doing so using his new user name.

He admitted that he was JL one month later (toward the end of January).
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: mohitomish on Mar 30, 04:00 AM 2018
@DRSODOKU
Why are you jumping on each and every opportunity to protect JL?  You and I both know any person using different allies names to promote the same thing can't be trusted, doesn't matter his system works or not. This is ethically and morally wrong in so many ways.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: DoctorSudoku on Mar 30, 04:36 AM 2018
Quote from: mohitomish on Mar 30, 04:00 AM 2018
@DRSODOKU
Why are you jumping on each and every opportunity to protect JL?  You and I both know any person using different allies names to promote the same thing can't be trusted, doesn't matter his system works or not. This is ethically and morally wrong in so many ways.


I am just stating some facts regarding this individual's use of TWO different user names (one from several years ago), which can confuse some people (you are one of them).

If you don't like this individual's betting strategies, stop reading and posting on his threads.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: blueman on Mar 30, 06:36 AM 2018
Quote from: Winner on Mar 28, 09:29 AM 2018
11 years and he just starting to want to pay his bills now . Don't get it but what do I know.

Surely has millions of debts? For 11 years plays PB for bigger amounts, receives daily and still works in the company? :lol:
P.S. sorry I did not resist!
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: nottophammer on Apr 08, 04:26 AM 2019
Quote from: bleep24 on Dec 21, 04:13 PM 2017
RED/BLACK 4 WIDE MATRIX METHOD

WWLLLWWLWWLLLWWLWWLLWWWLWWLWLW  covering 30 spins

+14 Units.   Live French table.         1 2 3 5 8 etc. progression       Between 1 and 4 losses in a chain are usual.

+1/-1 or a level type progression could also be used.      Looks promising.  It is 50/50 chance betting.

Brian

Anyone is Bleep still on the planet? Thought he'd be all over Random carpet ride or colour matrix.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: zhone on Apr 09, 11:56 AM 2019
Hi JL, do you still keep records about the frequency of 1st wins, 2nd wins, 3rd wins and 4th?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Ross on Mar 29, 04:46 PM 2021
From six items there are 360 possible combinations of 4 items.

Which one to pick?
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: schrodinger on Mar 29, 06:32 PM 2021
Quote from: Ross on Mar 29, 04:46 PM 2021From six items there are 360 possible combinations of 4 items.

bro ! you meant 360 arrangements ( with repetitions)  because combination is different math word :  4 items from 6 is just 15 distinct combinations.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: Ross on Mar 29, 07:05 PM 2021
Quote from: schrodinger on Mar 29, 06:32 PM 20214 items from 6 is just 15 distinct combinations

Yes, you're right. 

Can't find a site that will show the permutations as well as calculating them.
Do you know of one?

Still, 16 possibilities is about 14 too many.
Title: Re: CODE 4
Post by: schrodinger on Mar 30, 02:33 AM 2021
Quote from: Ross on Mar 29, 07:05 PM 2021Do you know of one?
I just calculate it in my head, C((p,n) = n! / [ (n-p)! * p! ] and arrangement A(p,n) the repetitions count so its n!/(n-p)! . you sure find many online if you google it.