Martingale or similar negative progression might work.

[ego]

  Martingale or similar negative progression might work.


One thing that strike my mind is that there is a tram or time-line using some bet selections.
It can be that we divide and clustering the distribution into cycles and when one cycle alternate with out any hit, then its a complete alternating cycle.


Now we can bet once each time one complete alternating cycle hit and win once.
Then it would be pretty rare, even if it will occur that two such cycles falling back to back.


It should boil down toward time and success to capitalize a certain amount of money.
Then we could apply regression and play with the same recent staking plan with lower values.
This means that when next losing cycle show, we already won and could not lose it all.


So what is the options.


Well the main idea is when you made a small net gain you lower you bets.
Then you are home free and could play non-stop.


But if lighting strike and it fall back to back at the very first attempt.
Then you would have higher levels with the main staking plan that along the way accept loses.
Not try to win it all back, not even try to break even.


I believe this line of thinking could succeed.