A method with teeth

[MrJ]

I know some will play this and I'll never hear a word from them, I accept that. Some might even rip the method AND still play it. lol This is flat betting. I use units of $15, $10 and $5 but use whatever fits your budget the best. I try and separate fact from opinion. A fact is, in 'X' number of spins, we will get a complete street hit, all 3 numbers.  I do have to thank Bayes ahead of time, he helped me a bit.

Ok, on to the method >> I keep track of the last *12* numbers hit. When the next number hits, cross off the latest number, we will always be looking at the LAST 12. Any street with TWO of the numbers hit, is what we are looking for. Example: the 14 and 15 are hit within the 12 recorded. We flat bet the 13 UNTIL either a win OR until either the 14 or 15 is NOT within the 12 recorded anymore. I have done lots of testing recording the last 11, 10, 13 and 14 spins, I have found that *12* works the best. Anytime all 3 (a win) are within the 12, no more betting on that number UNTIL it drops back to two within the street.

EXAMPLE: We were betting on the 13, it hits and we have a win. Lets say a couple spins later, the 14 drops from the last 12 recorded. We NOW have the 13 and 15 hit so we bet on the 14 until either a win OR until either the 13 or 15 is NOT within 12 recorded anymore. Don't make this tougher than it is. Sometimes I over explain stuff. lol Now, what about multiple bets going on? This is what I do in terms of betting. 1-2 bets: I bet $15 per number, 3 bets: I bet $10 per number, 4+ bets: I bet $5 per number. It is very rare to have 4+ within 12 but you MUST have a RULE for every situation.

My BR is 3K but use what you can afford. No progression here, that should make a few happy. Its VERY common for a street to hit within a short (12) period of time. What I like about this most, we are NOT betting on semi-cold streets. My win goal is 1K, then go home. Any questions, just ask.  Thanks for reading. Ken

[Red Nickels]

what is your rationale for betting the unhit number in a street?

[MrJ]

You mean the reason, dont you? As explained, OFTEN you will see all three in a street hit within a short (12) period of time. Also, we are AVOIDING semi-cold streets. (Sidenote: I forgot to mention, there are some spins where NO betting will take place)  Ken

[Red Nickels]

do you think that the 3 numbers that happen to make up a street have any more chance of hitting all together within 12 spins, than any group of any 3 numbers?  if not, then observing numbers in a street is just an easier way to watch 3 particular numbers, with no particular relationship to each other, other than they are in the same street, yes?

[Twisteruk]

Ken, what sort of Results have you had with this System ?
Have you been playing it long ?

Cheers 

[MrJ]

Sorry, I just saw this post. I have no losses so far, played 8 times. Great results and no progression!  Ken

[Blood Angel]

Hi

I tried this today

46 spins +81 units.
Obv. early days but stress free so far 

[Blood Angel]

Next session

55 spins  +37  units..

I could have quit twice before this in profit..

Mr J what is your recommended stop-loss?

[Blood Angel]

3rd session

28 spins +73 units

[Blood Angel]

4th session

117 spins  +72  units

[Blood Angel]

5th session

298 spins +87  units

At spin 100 was at +31 units

[MrJ]

"Mr J what is your recommended stop-loss?" >>> Its difficult to say cause I dont do things like others. lol I usually quit based on when I have to leave OR if my 3K BR is gone. So far, that has not happened. Your results look alot like mine. Its an easy method to play and flat betting does not kill you off fast.  Ken

[Twisteruk]

5th session

298 spins +87  units

At spin 100 was at +31 units

Blood Angel are you still playing this Method ?

I just wondered what your latest results are ?




Cheers 

[Blood Angel]

Hi Twister

No I haven't. I have been testing other things over at another forum (again a MrJ method)... I'm like a hyper-active kid sometimes when it comes to testing I'm afraid. 
It was going well however  so I may return to it when I get the opportunity. I'm a big fan of MrJ's ideas.

[Twisteruk]

Hi Twister

No I haven't. I have been testing other things over at another forum (again a MrJ method)... I'm like a hyper-active kid sometimes when it comes to testing I'm afraid. 
It was going well however  so I may return to it when I get the opportunity. I'm a big fan of MrJ's ideas.

lol 
I know what you mean !

Is this new Method by Ken even better ??!!??