A method with teeth

[Blood Angel]

Twister

It is his "My Method" which Is bring botted *sic* at another forum.

[GLC]

MrJ,

I have followed your postings for quite a while.  I have tested most of them with success.
My problem is that most of them involve such a long progression that to even test them takes a lot of time.  And, they all seem to be a form of martingale, howbeit for only 1 or 2 numbers.  That's where my fear comes in.  I know any martingale will eventually reach our limit and when it does on your systems, it's a wheelbarrow full of money.

On the other hand, you report to us that you stay ahead of the wheelbarrow with the systems you design and play.  

Another good thing I like about your systems is that they are designed for 0/00 wheels which is what I have access to also.

In your opinion which of all your systems do you think is the safest, profitable system.  In other words, if your avatar girl were your girlfriend and someone kidnapped her and said that you had to give them a system to play and if it didn't win, you would never lay eyes on her again.  Which system would it be?

I like this "Method With Teeth" because it doesn't involve a long progression.  Unless we want to play your progression idea or maybe even figure out another one.  I hate the idea of only betting on 1 number when you might have 2 or 3 available.  Maybe we could go ahead and bet, from left to right each step of our progression.  In other words if we have 3 numbers we can bet and we're at step16 in our progression, we might bet step 16 on the number closest to leaving the 12 set and 17 on the next closest and 18 on the furthest.  That way if any of the 3 hits we win.

Thanks,

George

P.S.  One last thing.  Have you tried to divide the wheel into 3 number sections and play this wheel based instead of table based?

[MrJ]

"Have you tried to divide the wheel into 3 number sections and play this wheel based instead of table based?" >>> No but I am working on my newest creation. I just HATE giving it out to certain AP (I'm not talking about you Jordan) posters who slam methods because I KNOW they will either test/play it. I could not HIDE like that.

"My problem is that most of them involve such a long progression" >>> I have stated in the past, the unit SIZE is more important than the dollar amount. I understand not everyone plays with a 4K BR but you can lower the unit sizes (I think). In my opinion, the more tracking involved, you should use a larger BR to compensate for your TIME put in.

"you report to us that you stay ahead of the wheelbarrow with the systems you design and play" >>> To be more specific, not all methods work for YEARS. Those methods I end up 'kicking to the side'. I have around 6 that are my favorite. Of those 6, 2 are not posted (never will be), and maybe 3 still get some posts added on from time to time. As I have always said, I post the thread and I'm done (other than questions being asked). I can not force anybody to play a certain method. I do NOT get offended in any way if someone does not feel comfortable reading or playing something I post, thats cool with me.

Ken

[MrJ]

Hey GLC, give me a day to really analize what I think is the 'best' or my favorites. Thats a great question. Plus, I keep very good records, I want to look things over before I commit to such an important answer.


Ken

[GLC]

Hey GLC, give me a day to really analize what I think is the 'best' or my favorites. that's a great question. Plus, I keep very good records, I want to look things over before I commit to such an important answer.


Ken

Ken mate,

Don't mean to rush you, but that day's stretchin' out quite a bit.

Just don't want you to forget me.  I'm really serious about your answer.

Thanks,

George

[MrJ]

DAMN, forgot bud. Hang tight, doing some testing right now.

Ken

[GLC]

DAMN, forgot bud. Hang tight, doing some testing right now.

Ken

Okay, no problem.

Finish your testing. 

I'll keep.

George

[MrJ]

@GLC >> Sorry it took so long. My top 3 POSTED methods that I play and are STILL doing quite well.....I will not rank them.

A) A Method With Teeth

B) My Method (Two's Company)

C) The other one, I'm not even sure I have a name for but have been playing it with GREAT results. >> This is a quick version of the rules: Track all 12 streets for every spin. Locate the furthest back unhit street, we'll say its the 4 5 6 street. The street MUST ALSO not of hit for a min. of 27 spins. Wait until it does hit, lets say the 5 hit. After that, start a 55 step progression on the 4 & 6. After a win, start over but all the while, continue to write down which street hits on every spin. The thought behind it. Its crazy odds that those TWO numbers you are betting on, just so happen to be the LAST two hit numbers of ALL the numbers?? No way. We all know, the last 1 or 2 or 3 unhit numbers can go unhit for hundreds of spins.

Ken

[GLC]

@GLC >> Sorry it took so long. My top 3 POSTED methods that I play and are STILL doing quite well.....I will not rank them.

A) A Method With Teeth

B) My Method (Two's Company)

C) The other one, I'm not even sure I have a name for but have been playing it with GREAT results. >> This is a quick version of the rules: Track all 12 streets for every spin. Locate the furthest back unhit street, we'll say its the 4 5 6 street. The street MUST ALSO not of hit for a min. of 27 spins. Wait until it does hit, lets say the 5 hit. After that, start a 55 step progression on the 4 & 6. After a win, start over but all the while, continue to write down which street hits on every spin. The thought behind it. Its crazy odds that those TWO numbers you are betting on, just so happen to be the LAST two hit numbers of ALL the numbers?? No way. We all know, the last 1 or 2 or 3 unhit numbers can go unhit for hundreds of spins.

Ken

Thanks Ken,

I think a lot of us will tend toward this 'method with teeth'.  It plays at a faster pace without as much tracking as the other two.

I'm still vacilating between the flat bet and a progression.

The way I see it, you seem to be able to do very well flat betting, but even though every now and then with a progression, you take a heavy hit, you should have been winning at a pace that keeps you well ahead of the progression loss.  At the end of a year's play, the two methods may not be that far away from each other as far as units won.

The only way to ever know is with massive amounts of either testing or playing.

I also think this concept would work well by dividing the wheel into 12 sets of 3 contiguous numbers and playing them the same way.

Carpet vs wheel may not make any difference and I think carpet is easier to play since it's right in front of your face, but, as you know, some people think playing the wheel gives you and advantage over the felt.  To each his own.

Thanks for all your help,

George

[Twisteruk]

Ken, is this still ure No1 choice of play ?

[Turner]

Ken, is this still your No1 choice of play ?

Ken....I love your stuff....no nonsense sledgehammer muscle.

I like this...I can see me trying this in the Casino next weds. Easy and makes sense.

When the breeze catches this idea, I am getting a wiff of Turbo456.

Turner

[VegasArick]

Wow, thanks Twister for uncovering this thread.

"A Method with Teeth" = very easy to learn and very easy to play!

Might give this a shot tonight.

[TwoCatSam]

By the gods, I'll have a look at it.

Trouble with my  ECLIPSE systems is they are as slow as the ******FIVE*********

Sam

[biagle]

i have a tracker for this.

im attaching print screen, marked red you should bet it.

[Twisteruk]

Is it ure own Tracker ?