This is not my invention, i remember this system, (but i don't remember who invented it!) all credits to the inventor. not me. This is an EC-system. This is the way i play it;
Procedure: Bet against the last 4 outcomes in any EC. (i chose to play with R/B)
For an example the four last outcomes was RBRR---> now you bet BRBB
When hit, (or lost the 4 steps) repeat procedure,(reset to 1u) and bet against the new 4 last outcomes
Total risk is a 4 step marty 1-2-4-16 STOP.
Losses do happen, and they have to be accepted. but that should not be the end of the world, since hitrate and recovery seems to be good.
Quote from: ignatus on Jan 06, 01:22 PM 2017
Total risk is a 4 step marty 1-2-4-8 STOP.
Correction
Test 2.
Test 3.
Just to clarity, +/-200 win or stop loss.......correct? :question:
Quote from: thelaw on Jan 06, 03:42 PM 2017
Just to clarity, +/-200 win or stop loss.......correct? :question:
Moneymanagement is not my strong side, but from my testings of earlier systems i now use to say:
Bankroll needed: 2*wingoal, or 3*wingoal, that should work in most cases
I was referring to your specific tests above.
Stop at +200 or -200 .........correct? :question:
Cheers! :thumbsup:
Quote from: thelaw on Jan 06, 04:00 PM 2017
I was referring to your specific tests above.
Stop at +200 or -200 .........correct? :question:
Cheers! :thumbsup:
No? This was played with 5u bets, now playing with 5u bets, minimum bankroll *should be* 500u, but since hitrate seems to be good(?), a lower stoploss can be used, with a wingoal of 100u, a stoploss (wingoal*2 or wingoal*3) of -200u, or -300u
So, having a wingoal of 200u, then a stoploss would be -400u or -600u
Playing with 1u bets, minimum bankroll *should be* 100u, really. Then a reasonable wingoal would be ~50u.
I played with 5u bets for demonstration, haven't encounterd a losing sequence yet, but we all know, that is bound to happen sooner or later.