WELCOME GUEST! JOIN THE #1 ROULETTE FORUM TO SHARE AND DISCUSS ROULETTE SYSTEMS. ALL ADS ARE REMOVED AFTER LOGIN. REGISTER HERE

Rates Received - mogul397

Pages: [1] 2
1
System Players Only (no advantage play) / Re: Idea based on streets
Like Like
on Yesterday at 10:19:55 AM by goldrosen
Very simple and easy method I began testing

I have tested 6 pages of zumma

I am trying to find a method with a hit rate that is safe to use with progression

So to reiterate my point.  A session that I played came up even with EC's.
And the progression was a bit of a white knucke.

"Safe to use with a progression"?

I think the progression is the thing to get fixed.
2
System Players Only (no advantage play) / Re: Idea based on streets
Like Like
on Yesterday at 10:19:45 AM by goldrosen
There is a 59 step prog. for 1 Double street but you need 2000 units if betting 1 unit.   I have checked it against about 30 spin sets from Dublinbet posted on this forum.  Every set won in the end but there were some highs on the way.   What I did notice was that if before playing you check the history board and identify a D/S with 2 or 3 hits within first 10/12 spins then this is a d/S that is hot and it went on to win without any long prog.

Another thing that I have been trying (yes it has been done before sometime ago) is betting all 3 E/C`s to repeat previous.  Flat betting.  E/C`s should work out  about 50/50 but what I have noticed is that is can vary up to 10 units either way and will swing from one way to the other.  Keep playing until you are (say) 10 units in front then jump off.  Worst that I have had is break even.  No stress.  You do not have to work out what to bet.  Or bet opposite to last or alternate: it`s your choice.   Is differential betting appropriate for this (has progression)

Brian

I think that I agree with this 100%.  I have notice the same pendulum swing.

So now it seems like we have a toolkit of similar methods doing similar things.

I think that seeing a losing streak/trend on one and playing it to comeback might
be a way of jumping in and jumping out.

I am getting a lot more intuitive sitting at the table.
3
System Players Only (no advantage play) / Re: Idea based on streets
Like Like
on Yesterday at 10:18:11 AM by goldrosen
HG aside, for a stellar set of results, 7 losses in a row would put you on the ropes.
A general observation for what results maybe in using a progression.

Often we think about the "killer streak". Well that streak can be embedded I a good session.
Or there can be a real streak, which will knock you out of the park.

Bet selection aside, I think that the mm is the thing that is the problem to be addresses.

I remember decades ago saying to someone in a chat room, "It's not WHAT happens that
we don't know. It's what ORDER it will happen".

It's nice to play a method that just feeds you profit. But maybe that's not the correct thing
to do. Can't have your cake and eat it too.

How close are you to the casino?
4
System Players Only (no advantage play) / Re: Idea based on streets
Like Like
on Yesterday at 10:17:46 AM by goldrosen
So is this the "same old same old"?  EC betting with the same results?

http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18368.45  Reply # 54



On a more serious note, I decided to play this live today. Using the
50 cent inside bets I bet $1.50 on the 3 choiced. And tracked it.

I made like $10, and it was seeming very good. Flat bet. And I stopped
betting and recorded. I have the paper here in front of me.

At a certain point I got a lot of losses on paper.  7 in a row including one zero.
Mentally and emotionally it seemed a little sour.

I've been out all night and just got back looking it over. Overall I counted the
wins and losses. I basically got 25 wins and 25 losses. Including 3 losses from zeros.

But my point is that I'm not sure how I would play this with a progression of any
kind with confidence.  Even with an actual even split, the distribution was the thing
that was killing me.  Good bet selection just didn't cover it (unless I just bet
blind and was happy breaking even).





5
Bet selection / Re: ego's march
Like Like
on December 19, 2016, 07:42:54 AM by goldrosen
I don't usually beg to understand things

I will ask once

Then I will leave it

I don't beg

I don't think it's a matter of begging.  It's seeing potential value.
6
The Notepad / Ignatius
Finger Finger
on December 09, 2016, 06:31:58 AM by goldrosen
Is it possible, anywhere, for you Ignatius to present a method that we
can actually use, that doesn't require a 1000 unit bank and has a couple
200 unit drawdowns?

That is what I expect to see when you make a post with a bunch of charts.

Seems like you've got that down pat. But as the old commercial said,
"Where's the beef"?
7
Bet selection / Re: EC MATRIX
Finger Finger
on November 02, 2016, 02:09:52 AM by thelaw
Huh?
8
Main Roulette Board / Re: The greatest 3/1/1 system in the world!
WTF? (doesn't make sense) WTF? (doesn't make sense)
on October 27, 2016, 01:37:19 AM by richbailey86
so all men who say hello to a man they havnt seen for ages are gay?

How does that work exactly?

Let me explain.  They have extreme, dormant, sexual feelings that they keep
repressed.  Then, when they have a sighting, they EXPLODE with enthusiasm, and
all kinds of ass kissing.  Like moose and wild animals do when they compete for a mate.

I understand your confusion since if you are not from that group it is often
difficult to see.. :ooh: :ooh: :ooh: :question: :yawn:
9
Main Roulette Board / Re: The greatest 3/1/1 system in the world!
WTF? (doesn't make sense) WTF? (doesn't make sense)
on October 27, 2016, 01:34:23 AM by richbailey86
And then the soap opera fantasy world kicks in. Mistaking fantasy with
reality. And they picture GLC as actually being George Clooney....

Remember. He is BOTH smart AND handsome. :lol: :lol: :lol:
10
System Players Only (no advantage play) / Re: Washoo2
Like Like
on October 13, 2016, 07:42:24 AM by turnerfeck
Mogul

   Sorry that my post need mod approval.


Good Bye to this forum

That is always the case. All posts need mod approval.

I know a guy who was arguing with me about something. A speaker. Finally
I asked if he had ever watched the speaker. He said "no". But he knew all
about why he was wrong.

Same with your method. You "read and post" comments about how great your method
is, but nothing concete. Heck, in this case I would assume that you don't even know the
guy who sent the endorsement. Makes you like the other guy I know.

Like they said in math class "Show your work".
Pages: [1] 2