The New Road To Riches Has Only Three Steps

[GLC]

The new Road to Riches has only 3 steps.

Step 1.  Bet 1-1 on a double dozen.  If lose move 1 step down on the progression and repeat step 1.
If you win go to  Step 2.

Step 2.  Bet 3 units on an even chance.  If lose move 1 step down on the progression and repeat step 1.  If win go to Step 3.

Step 3.  Bet 3-3 on a double dozen.  If lose move 1 step down on the progression and repeat step 1.  If win move to beginning of progression and repeat step 1.

Note:  The above clause "move 1 step down on the progression and repeat step 1" is talking about the next step below the initial step we're playing.  All three statements refer to the same step down.  I hope that's clear as the Muddy Boggie.


Here's the progression and it represents the 1st double dozen bet of each attack.

1-1
1-1
1-1
1-1
2-2
2-2
3-3
4-4
5-5
6-6
8-8
11-11
13-13
17-17
22-22
28-28
36-36
46-46
60-60
77-77
99-99

That's 21 chances to win 3 bets in a row.  I decided that starting with a single dozen bet is too risky.  A double dozen hits much more often.  The negative is that you win 1 for risking 2.

If you lose the entire progression line you will lose -886 units.  The next level in the line would put us way over 1000 units.

Play for 100 units then call it quits.

Here's a much less risky version that the other 99% of us can use.

Bet line is 1-1; 1-1; 1-1; 1-1; 1-1; 1-1; 1-1; 1-1; 1-1; 1-1.  That's 10 times or 20 units.
Quit if you lose 20 units or win 40 units.
After the 4th 1-1 you won't fully recover on every win.  You'll need multiple wins to reach +40.

This -20 and +40 is a sliding range.  That means that if you start off winning and you are up 13 units and then lose, you only lose to -7.  Meaning that anytime you lose 20 units from your highest point, you stop. 

Conversely, if you are down -12 and then you start winning, you stop when you reach +28.  That's 40 units from your biggest draw down.

I might pontificate for a moment about this stop-loss vs win target sliding range.  This is a very useful concept to apply to most if not all of our systems.  It mitigates our wins and losses and keeps us in the hunt longer.

Cheers,

George


P.S.  Please note that there's no need to move to the even chance bet if you continue to win on the 1st double dozen bet.  Anytime you reset to 1, stay on the first 1-1 until you lose a double dozen bet.  Some times you can rack up a lot of wins before having to bet a 3 unit bet on the even chance.

[Ralph]

I am not sure if it is best to start on a  2/3 chance. We should of course take it more often, but if we win we got one, if we lose we lose two. A zero hit takes two.

I use to lose 2/3 bet often.

I would use  1/3 bet.

1 1/3 + 2 *  1/2

1 on 1/3  gives 3,  3 on EC gives 6,  6 on EC gives 12
1 in 12  winning 12  total  if no zero


2 on 2/3   3 on EC  6 on 2/3  gives us 9

The last have higher chance of winning, but at double stake.

I think we can find a softer progression on the first as well.

[Ralph]

Playing this today, the rapid way.

It is one bet on a dozen, two on an EC, all parlay.

If we put the first stake on a dozen the second on color and the third on O/E or H/L we can speed
it up threefold.  We can bet three play at one spin.

We start with one on the first bet, (2/3 or 1/3)
The second spin we make the first dozen bet and the second EC bet.
The third spin we make the first dozen and the second  and third EC/dozen bet.
After that its just goes on all steps in one spin.

In this way we can (if we able to keep it in head)  go through the session faster, and if it works
well, get faster winnings.

If you bet as proposed by GLC , then you may use differential betting on the first
and last, in other word the same bet counts for the first and the third, the stake is for both.
You can of course diff it more if you do not bet the same dozen in the first and last bet.


It may sounds funny, but you may save chips and the outcome will not differ from doing it one by one.

(I think it will be same, if you are of other opinion, pl give me proof).

[KCIN012]

Hi There my name is Nick GLC

Do you not think it would be a good idea to use 3 systems for the 3 steps
Such as illuminati by warrior for the 1st step
Pattern breaker for th 2nd step
And hybrid 4 dc for 3rd step
Instead of guessing, would take a while to do but maybe 3 steps on each
Just a thought.
Dont all shout at me this is my 1st post as a newbie

Nick

[Ralph]

The play today went very well. Start as I use to do with 1 cent, and after some time went to 10 cent bet. I could take even 1 Euro, but it have to wait until a know the method better.

Betting all steps (from three progressions) at the time catch rapid result. If we count the small value of the units, then 70 Euro is very good.

Most of the play fail, but the loss is (as I play) one unit, and if we win 1 out of 7 we go well.

On an online casino, playing three steps at the time, it is a lot of sessions in just an hour.

This method can lose, but not much. Avoid  fast progressions, as things changes to the better in time, do
not be in hurry to catch up, Why rise in a bad streak? Double the stakes or more in good  flow.