• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

The Triple Attack

Started by GLC, Aug 15, 05:13 PM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

pedro

Hi George,

I had an enlarged prostate they even wanted to trim it down but i declined and just by chance struck up a conversation with another ex sufferer yes ex and now I can say my psa is sitting on 2 and the way this was achieved ,drinking Stinging Nettle tea, even grow my own nettles now and you could have knocked me over with a feather when my G P asked me what it tastes like? up untill then he was all medical.
I thought I would post this here and not in a pm as it may help others.

Now back to the system ,thanks.

Cheers Pedro

GLC

Thanks for the tip Pedro.  Stinging Nettle Tea sounds fairly straight forward.  It may hold off the lazer.  How often do you have to drink it?

Not to worry about interrupting the topic.  It's my topic.  We can talk about whatever I want! :smile:

In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

Turner

Quote from: pedro on Aug 17, 09:39 PM 2012

I thought I would post this here and not in a pm as it may help others.

Absolutly right....Prostrate cancer is the 2nd biggest killer in men. The 1st biggest killer in men is men not going to the doctors until its too late.

vladir

Quote from: GLC on Aug 17, 12:48 PM 2012
I assume that's the long version of Tai Chi.  I've considered it.  Are you a student?
Yes, I am.
Long version? I didn't get that one...
"In God we trust; all others must bring data", W. Edwards Deming

GLC

Quote from: vladir on Aug 17, 11:27 AM 2012
...taichichuan / qiqong... This is a heck of a lot longer than 'tai chi'.
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

GLC

Quote from: turnerfeck on Aug 18, 03:40 PM 2012
Absolutly right....Prostrate cancer is the 2nd biggest killer in men. The 1st biggest killer in men is men not going to the doctors until its too late.

Nothing like a slap of reality up the side of my head. :'(
 
Fortunately, I go every year for my pretty complete physical and blood work.  I forgot to mention that I also have fatty liver.  Just writing it makes me feel over-weight.  I seem to have enough little things wrong with me that they're always checking up on something.  If anything major is reving up they're sure to catch it early.  With my current insurance anyway.  :thumbsup:

As Obamacare kicks in more and more I may have to go off-shore to get adequate health care. :-\
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

TwoCatSam

***As Obamacare kicks in more and more I may have to go off-shore to get adequate health care.***

Now, George, you know this Obamacare will work!!  Everyone--and I mean everyone--will buy insurance.  Or pay a fine.

PROBLEM..............

Who will go into the inner cities where the gangs rule and collect those fines??

Anyone want a job??

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

Chauncy47

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Aug 18, 11:37 PM 2012
***As Obamacare kicks in more and more I may have to go off-shore to get adequate health care.***

Now, George, you know this Obamacare will work!!  Everyone--and I mean everyone--will buy insurance.  Or pay a fine.

PROBLEM..............

Who will go into the inner cities where the gangs rule and collect those fines??

Anyone want a job??

Sam

I am mostly an observer here in the forum ... but even the thought of Obamacare will pull me into the participatory mode, being from the USA ...LOL  .... The word PROBLEM is written all over Obamacare.

GLC

In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

pedro

HI George,
When I first heard of the Nettle and out of desperation, I just drank it in place of my normal tea or coffee, ( gee about 6-7 cups per day I thought well if  this doesnt kill me the prostate will, how wrong was I) I still drink it and I will for my living years, now I enjoy my tea and coffee, drinking 3-4 cups of nettle daily.

Cheers

GLC

Quote from: pedro on Aug 23, 07:02 PM 2012
HI George,
When I first heard of the Nettle and out of desperation, I just drank it in place of my normal tea or coffee, ( gee about 6-7 cups per day I thought well if  this doesn't kill me the prostate will, how wrong was I) I still drink it and I will for my living years, now I enjoy my tea and coffee, drinking 3-4 cups of nettle daily.

Cheers

I think I'll give it a try.  Can I put a little cream and sweetener in it or does it taste great naturally?
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

Turner

Quote from: GLC on Aug 18, 11:13 PM 2012

Nothing like a slap of reality up the side of my head. :'(


Sorry..I didn't mean to sound insensitive.....my point was that you went to a doc.....which is overcoming the first common killer of men. Many men don't visit doctors and die of a very curable illness.
I can't believe you have to pay for medical treatment in "the land of the free".

We pay 10% of our wage called National Insurance.

Its doctors...hospital....ambulance and retirement pension.

And we can access sh!t loads of casinos...online and landbased  :thumbsup:

That WAS insensitive!

GLC

Quote from: turnerfeck on Aug 24, 06:12 PM 2012

I can't believe you have to pay for medical treatment in "the land of the free".

Fortunately, I can afford medical insurance.  What I like about it is when I need a medical procedure, it happens almost immediately.  I'm afraid if Obama gets re-elected that'll change.

And we can access sh!t loads of casinos...online and landbased  :thumbsup:

That WAS insensitive!
Yes it was!! :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X

In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

MuppetMan

Hi GLC,
could you possibly point me towards Icemans 2nd component system?
Cheers MM

GLC

Quote from: MuppetMan on Aug 25, 01:26 AM 2012
Hi GLC,
could you possibly point me towards Icemans 2nd component system?
Cheers MM
Iceman was an interesting study.  Also highly volatile and antagonistic.

It seems his topic has been erased.  I looked for it the other day and couldn't find it.  Here it is in a nutshell.

Track any of the even chance bets.  We'll use R/B for this example.
Track on paper the wins and losses as if you were playing Follow-the-last-color.
Bet for real every other decision.  Bet for every other decision to be the opposite result of the last decision.

If the last decision was a win, meaning you got an RR or a BB then you bet that the next decision will be a loss or RB or BR.

We're always betting that the even numbered decisions are opposite of the odd number decisions.

I will show a short series.  I am tracking on paper the 1st dimension which is FTL on every decision.  I am betting for real, the 2nd dimension, that every other result will be the opposite of the last result. 

Flat bet only.

Spins      1st dim      2nd dim       total
R
R                W               NB                   No bet on odd numbered decisions.  This is 1st decision
B                 L                +              +1  Since last decision was W we bet for loss and win
R                 L                NB                  No bet on odd numbered decisions.  This is 3rd decision
B                 L                 -                0  Last decision was L so we bet for W but it lost
B                 W               NB
B                 W                -                -1  Last decision was W so we bet for L but it won
B                  W              NB
R                  L                +               0  Last decision was W so we bet for L
B                  L                NB
B                  W               +               +1  Last decision was L so we bet for W

That's the bet selection method. 

Play until you're +4 or -8.

Iceman's theory is that since we're playing FTL decision we should win about 49 bets and lose 51 bets out of a 100 on average figuring in the zero.
By betting for a loss periodically, we actually take some of the house's advantage away from them because we're betting against ourselves with them when we're betting for our FTL decision to lose.

The problem with his thinking is that we're betting FTL in the 1st dimension only.  Betting for Opposite-the-last anytime the last decision was Same-as-the-last is a different bet selection method and it's convoluted thinking to say that it adds advantage to FTL.

Anyway, the reason I use it sometimes is because it seems, and I emphasize the word seems, that we get short runs of wins 2-4 in length more often than most of the other bet selection methods.  If this is true, then it always benefits a progression system to have clumps of wins with no losses in between because it gives us a chance to make a big run out of the hole.  Often, with a progression method, a win of 3 or 4 in a row is enough to get us back to new profits.

There's nothing special about FTL.  You could just as easily bet the Penultimate, OLD, RED only or Back only, etc...

You can go to the 3rd dimension by betting for an opposite decision than the last decision of the 2nd dimension.  I have tested this a little and it doesn't seem to add anything to the system except complication.

Hope that's clear enough. :thumbsup:
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

-