• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

.

Started by ego, Aug 23, 03:04 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

ego


I have been reading at a sport-betting forum about how players build up a 2K bankroll pretty fast using the 2-6 method.
They are using different variance of odds to succeed.

The down side to apply it to roulette is that the odds are predetermined.
But is am sure some one clever could solve this puzzle ...

You can read about the method with attach PDF ...
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

hanshuckebein

this has reminded me of an ebook I found on the net a long time ago and simply forgot about.

if you compare the two books you'll find more than just a few similarities.

cheers

hans
"Don't criticize what you don't understand. You never walked in that man's shoes." (Elvis Presley)

ego


Nice ...

I find the 2-6 method at page 29 with your PDF ...
Also could see that bankroll management is pretty much the same - indeed very similar :-)
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Drazen

Thanks guys!

Drazen

ego


-

Professional handicappers ....

Lets assume you can not outguess the odds or what team will win flat-betting using Asian handicap with 1.80/2.00 - then you can use the modified 2-6 method.

You can use 1 1 1 1 2 3 - that is six attempts - win or break even.
So if your first bet is 1.80 you don't need to adjust the algorithm.
You will probably alternating with the odds between 1.80/2.00 during your play - then if you got to play the odds 1.80 later during the algorithm you just add 0.20 or 0.40.

W +1
LWW +1
LWLW +0
LWLLW +0
LWLLLW -1

LLWW +0
LLWLW +0
LLWLLW -1

LLLWW +0
LLLWLW -1

LLLLWW +1

You could also aim to restart the algorithm from W and LW ...
This is if you get small difference using odds and don't know how to flat-betting.

Don't use a algorithm above 8 attempts.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

superman

Hi ego

I've been doing something similar with greyhounds, I wrote a bot that gathers all the runners past info and calculates which I 'think' will win, here's my results for the past few days, mainly evening races but today during the day

L W
L L W
L L W
W
L L W
L W
W
L W
L L L W
W
L L W
L W

The odds are on average 2.4 as the dogs I pick are not usually the favs, each above line is an attack until a win, I am using +1 on a loss, I have read the pdf you posted and found that info very interesting, the 2-6 is probably the best one from the lot in my opinion
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

ego


Nice results Superman - thanks for contributing ...
Yes i agree with you - 2-6 method is a sure way to build 2K pretty fast if you can pick 2 in 6 or 2 in 8.

Valid and clever staking plan.
I also like that it does come in different flavours ...

5.5 11 22 33 44 66 = 181,5 serie

11 22 44 66 88 132 = 363 serie

110 220 440 660 880 1320 = 3630 serie

1110 2200 4400 6600 8800 13200 = 36310 serie

I pretty much into sport betting at betfair as you can not be limited or get a ban as players play aginst each other like a market and betfair get a small cut.
Also study horse race ... main reason is that you can play with out get limited or get a ban.

The biggest challange is to apply the 2-6 metod or 2-8 into roulette even money with La Partage rule or baccarat - that is my main search now.
If i succed i will use it as my main dummy bets when collecting data regarding physics.

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

-