Super Surround system (the final vertion of the surround)

[Master_of_pockets]

After long testing and lot of thinking I came up with the last and final version of the surround system.
The best way is to bet 3 bets (as the 1st surround) and not 4(as the 2 latest versions).
The reason is simply because the losses from the progressions were very high by using 4 bets...also the 3 bets is a lot easier to play.

After a lot of thinking and adding cool things in the method it can t get any safer.
It s making +100 chips easily(the average is 0.8 chips per spin)
The recomended Br and stop-loss is 150 chips

I will post the full system rules here so there is no need for the other versions to be read again.

Bet Selection

The bet selection is steady.
We are always betting in every spin Black + Even + 3d Column with 1 chip on every bet.


(I tested in 50.000 spins with the auto RX option all the bet selections of the anomalies of the table and this is one was FAR safer than the others...ofcource it can be altered to the opposite combination with the RED inside but logic say that are the same so stick to this one that I posted)

The Progression

Progression on a losing spin
1) When ONLY 1 Ec wins we are adding 1 chip on all 3 bets
2)When only the Col wins leave the same amount of chips for the next bet..its a no win no loss situation.
3)When all 3 bets are losing we are adding 2 chips on all bets. So zero is also a loss on all 3 bets.

Progression on a winning spin
1)When the 2 Ecs are winning we are  doing- 1 chip on all bets
2)when 1Ec and the 3d col is winning we are doing -2 on all bets
3)When all 3 bets are winning we are doing -3 on all bets

AND THE MOST IMPORTANT :
When we are in a new Profit or break even we are resetting the bets to 1 chip each no matter where the progression was.

Important rule(add on)

1)When the bets will have reach 6 on every bet and more we are  adding the split bet 0-1(cover bet).
With this way we are betting on 2 numbers that are completely OUT of the main bet...so the loss if those 2 numbers hit will be far less.
2)when the bets have reach 10 bets and more we are betting with 1 chip only the zero.you know why.
Fortutately this -1 chip that will be happening if the zero will not be hitting is nothing because when the main bets are winning the wins are big...so better to have our a$$es covered if zero hits...

By the above rule we must not add 2 chips if the 0-1 or the zero hits...because the loss will be tiny...so the bets will remain the same for the next spin....
if we have some wins and we are still not break even or + and the bets are now 5 or less on the main bets we are taking out the cover bets.

The last add on is that we must change the mechanical progression in some situations , like if we are close in making a new high and the bets are still high , we reduce them accordingly in order for avoid a situation of a bad streak to happen and make the bets even higher and bust our BR.

.........................

The betting selection is very sophisticated and with the progression can make mirricals.

Only 6 numbers (leaving out the zero) can make us lose all the bets and have to add 2 chips for the next spin. With the zero cover bet we stop worring about the zero when the chips are high on the main bets.
2 numbers make ALL bets win
8 numbers are making us win good and reduce 2 chips on every bet
8 numbers are making us win with the 2 Ecs
4 numbers make us break even that belongs to the 3d col
9 numbers make the 1 Ecs win.

According to the unfair roulette this combinations are the best we can have...

I beleave that this is one of the most powerfull and simplier systems to play out there.

[TwoCatSam]

I'll get right on it!

[Master_of_pockets]

Hehehe my good Sam. 
Post some results and videos if you like.

[Master_of_pockets]

I would like to mention also that the power of the system is coming from progressing a sheme of bets and not progressing-reducing(on a win) individual bets that can sleep for long...
For example if we would bet the same bet selection of the surround and progress only the winning bets seperately and not all togeather the col or the 1 ec could lose a lot of times and had on them a lot of chips wile the other one(s) that woould be winning would have only 1 chips on them because of the winning reducing and still lose a lot and not make profits....

wile by progressing the hole bet selection profits are made easily.

Ok that s it.....

[Ralph]

High piles gives more winnings and more losses.  If the not covered number wins it can reach high in progressions.

I have tested to be more conservative in progressions, and not even progress on the first total loss, just to see if a bad streak will come. If we lose many times in a row, we lose less then, and if I win we are soon back on new high.

On some winnings, which put us close to new high, we can reduce the bets.

I attach some spins, there you can see, I strarted carefully, become even more carfully, and still come out with 24 Inuits in about 30 spins.

[Ralph]

I still use 2 2/1 bets, and I am not sure that's the best. Tested this time at an American Wheel.
If I were aggressive in progression I should meet the stop/loss.  Got some bad numbers, and did not progress until the first win. Never progress more than one, sometimes set back only one.

The total downdraw were around 100, could climb up to 10 plus.

When we cover many numbers, progressions can grow scary, in a bad sequence of spins, the fewer we lose then, the fewer to recover. As it is 2/3 or more covered, we must expect the bad runs to not be too long, and we at the end get some winning spin. We can not progress to win back all in one spin, as a few losses can take us down to a not recoverable level, if the progression goes to rapid.