• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Inspiration & implementation of LW-Registry & situational 24 number play ...

Started by ego, Aug 31, 02:52 PM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

ego

Aug 31, 02:52 PM 2012

Inspiration & implementation of LW-Registry & situational 24 number play ...
All thanks goes to Lanky & Victor ...

Now i will tweak this and change it to the better.
This is a old post i made in the past during the year 2008.

Playing model.

1. Bankroll managment
2. Staking plan
3. Stopp loss - Win goal - Satey net - Push
4. Bet selections

The raw idea to tweak:

I like the idea using LW patterns to grind out a profit but I don´t like to lose all bets if zero strikes.
Now I like the idea to reduce the loses if zero strikes if I am going to play 24 numbers.
But all methods that i see around accept loses when zero strike.

If you can reduce you loses then I don´t see that any argument or opinion can defend and tell us to place two bets on two dozens - straight up - if we have a Le Partage rule at our country.

My opinion is that if we are going to play 24 numbers we should only place 3 units on low and one unit one line 4 or place 3 units on high and 1 unit on line 3.
This is the same thing, it covers 24 numbers but we only lose half the bet on low and high if zero strikes.

2 units on dozen 1 and 2 would be 4 units and we lose them all if zero strikes.
3 units on low and 1 unit on line 4 would be 4 units but we only lose 2,5 units if zero strikes and we keep 1,5 units.
We keep the half bet on the EC.

For the long run that amount 1,5 will increase to become a serious amount of money.

Here you have a visual:







Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#1
Aug 31, 02:56 PM 2012

The raw idea to tweak:

This will leave us with two highways, two permanence's based upon how we will place our bets.
The tracking will be based upon low and dozen 2 and high and dozen 2.
To make it simple I call the two highways for L2 and H2.

So if we take some numbers then this is how we would gathering our LW Registry:

Dozens - 1222313221122132122
L2 - :lwl::l:w
H2 - l:wl:llwwlwwlww

Tracking highway L2 then dozen 1 and 2 will become a win and dozen 3 a loss.

Tracking highway H2 then dozen 2 and 3 will become a win and dozen 1 a loss.

Here we can apply the LW patterns to grind out a profit.
PLZ feel free to find out what LW patterns that works for you.

Here is an example using LLW and LWLW and we aim to hit two wins in a row.

100 RNGs

L2
llwwll:wlwwlll:wl:wzwl:wlwll:wl:l:wlll::l:lll::zlwlwwlzwlwwlllll:llllwlwwl
H2
wwl:wllwwll::l:llzwwlll::wl:::l:lll:wl:::llz:lwwzlwl::ll::wwlw

llww
llww
llww
llzww
llww
lwlww
llzww
lwlww
lwlww
llww

Result LW Registry w w w w w w w w w w

100 RNGs

L2
lllwlwlwwlwlllllllz:::wlwwlwwllwwllwwll:lwwl:::wwl:wlllwl::wlwl:l:wll:lllw
H2
:l:wlwl::wzwlwllwwll:lwll::ll::l:wllwwl:lwlwll:lwllwll::::lwwlwl:w

lwlww
lwlww
llww
llww
llww
llww
llww
llww
llww
lwlwl
llww
llwl
llww
lwlww
llww
lwlww

Result LW Registry w w w w w w w w w l w l w w w w

100 RNGs

L2
wl:wllwllwz:wl:llwlwll::lll:lz:lll:lwllz:wlwlllwwllwwllwwlwlwl:::l:wll:w
H2
:l::wwzwlll:lwwl:::::lwz::wlwwlwwz::::::wwl:::wwlwlwl:lwwl

llwl
llwzw
llwl
llww
llww
llww
lwlwl
llww
lwlwl

Result LW Registry l z w l w w w l w l
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#2
Aug 31, 02:58 PM 2012

The raw idea to tweak:

Now I don´t know what would be the best way to use LW patterns but I think this is a good way to reduce our loses regarding the zero tax.

Here is the the result of the experiment.

w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w l w l w w w w l z w l w w w l w l

What do you think about this?
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#3
Aug 31, 03:03 PM 2012

The raw idea to tweak:

Triggers ? when to start and when to quit is the question.

100 RNGs

llwwll:wlwwlll:wl:wzwl:wlwll:wl:l:wlll::l:lll::zlwlwwlzwlwwlllll:llllwlwwl
wwl:wllwwll::l:llzwwlll::wl:::l:lll:wl:::llz:lwwzlwl::ll::wwlw



100 RNGs

lllwlwlwwlwlllllllz:::wlwwlwwllwwllwwll:lwwl:::wwl:wlllwl::wlwl:l:wll:lllw
:l:wlwl::wzwlwllwwll:lwll::ll::l:wllwwl:lwlwll:lwllwll::::lwwlwl:w



100 RNGs

wl:wllwllwz:wl:llwlwll::lll:lz:lll:lwllz:wlwlllwwllwwllwwlwlwl:::l:wll:w
:l::wwzwlll:lwwl:::::lwz::wlwwlwwz::::::wwl:::wwlwlwl:lwwl



100 RGNs

:l:wwl:zwlwllwllwlwl:wwlwwlwwllllwlllwlwwlwwll:wlwlwllwwlwwlwlll::wwlwzwzwwlllllwwl:
wllwwl:wwllzwwlwwlwwl::ll:wl:::wwlwwl:wwl:wlwwllwll::llll:wlzlzwl::wwlww



100 RNGs

::zl:wllwl:lwlwllllwwlwl:wwll:z:lll:wlwll:l:lwl::wl:llwwl:wllllwlwlwwlwl
:wwlzwwl::l:wwl::wl:lllwwlwlzwwl:lll::wlwlll::lwl:l:llwl::wl:ll:

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#4
Aug 31, 03:08 PM 2012

The raw idea to tweak:

This is the result of 200 trails wl:wwlwwl:lwlwlw still looking good.
Here below is the patterns.

lwlww
llwl
llww
llww
lwlww
llww
llww
llwl
llww
llww

llwl
llww
lwlww
llww
llwl
llww
lwll
llww
lwll
llww

In 500 trails we have not hit 2 loses in a row hahaha that is funny stuff ::::::wlwl:wlzwl:lwlwl:wwlwwl:lwlwlw

Well some things regarding the patterns llWW can also be lllllllWW and the lwlww can also be lwllllww but its still is the same pattern.
And if it goes lwlllwllwlwlwlllllwllwllw with no virtual win you can continue to track but not play.

Nothing is due to happen and systems lose and gamblers don't with awareness what make a playing model strong and weak.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.
-
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions