BRETT MORTON`S 22 Inside numbers

[Tamino]

For those of you  who might be interested I would  like to repeat  Brett Morton`s  22 numbers  for inside play as posted at the  other VLS board  4/21/2009.

3 units dbl street   1-6

3 units dbl street   10-15

3 units  dbl street    22-27

3 units corner bet  28/29/31/32

TAMINO
HAPPY WINNINGS!!!

[ego]

What kind of money management would you apply ...
What kind of bet selection would you apply ...

[Tamino]

For more details I cannot speak for Mr. Morton. I know that  his  system ( with the single 0 wheel in mind) is very similar to Mr Patrick`s 22 action  numbers for the 0/00 wheel

Those  22   numbers are well distributed around the wheel  with never more than 2 empty clicks in between.

The only difference  is  the corner bet  with Patrick recommendiing  2 units..Each  position will return   a net win of 7 units.  wheras  the  return at Morton`s is  lower at the double streets  and  higher on the  corner bet due to  the 3 unit position.

Progressions  for inside play ? That I would leave to each individual player or by  checking  the  book of the  author  (s) regarding  their  recommendations ..

Ditto for money management. There nobody will listen any way. What`s the use to explain.





Tamino
HAPPY WINNINGS!!

[Ralph]

My progression here is one up on a win, down to start after a loss.

[Robeenhuut]

For more details I cannot speak for Mr. Morton. I know that  his  system ( with the single 0 wheel in mind) is very similar to Mr Patrick`s 22 action  numbers for the 0/00 wheel

Those  22   numbers are well distributed around the wheel  with never more than 2 empty clicks in between.

The only difference  is  the corner bet  with Patrick recommendiing  2 units..Each  position will return   a net win of 7 units.  wheras  the  return at Morton`s is  lower at the double streets  and  higher on the  corner bet due to  the 3 unit position.

Progressions  for inside play ? That I would leave to each individual player or by  checking  the  book of the  author  (s) regarding  their  recommendations ..

Ditto for money management. There nobody will listen any way. What`s the use to explain.





Tamino
HAPPY WINNINGS!!

ND

Its surprising that you can not offer any real strategy since you posted this method long time ago at VLS forum and claimed to have win ratio of 2 out of 3.... Did i miss anything?  Ok maybe that you aimed to win at this ratio but you always claimed to be ahead. And betting on a regular basis on more than half of the numbers of the wheel seems to be a disaster in a opinion of most of seasoned players  flat or with any prog.   

[Tamino]

I  make it a habit to  win 2 out of 3 sessions. At a single 0 wheel  mmy edge is22 over  15 and  at the 0/00 it is 22 over 16.


I am always aware that  any of those 15  or 16 numbers is my potential enemy. I am playing under the strictest rules  for loss limts,  win goal ( but not  win limit) a certain number  of losses in a row as signals when  to terminate as session.

With all thse safe guards   it is possible to lose  3 sessions. Well then  it was not my day.Tomorrow is another day.

One might lose the first session win  the second as well as the third session and you know what  you will find  that you have  broken even. BE content with that result

What matters  is  DISCIPLINE  to know  when to quit......... either Up or Down.

TAMINO
HAPPY BWINNINGS!!!

[Tamino]

Robeeenhuut,

If you thought I exaggerated  please refresh that particular post of that date   and publsh it  verbatim.
In addition I would  like  to ask any one who is challenging any of my posts  to review  my  win and loss statements which   I had given for 2008 and 2009. at the VLS board. There I can be  found  as  Nathan Detroit.



P.S. I am not wasing my time  to search the archives either.  The date  of Morton was on my file with his  22 numbers.



TAMINO
HAPPY WINNINGS!!!

[Robeenhuut]

I  make it a habit to  win 2 out of 3 sessions. At a single 0 wheel  mmy edge is22 over  15 and  at the 0/00 it is 22 over 16.


I am always aware that  any of those 15  or 16 numbers is my potential enemy. I am playing under the strictest rules  for loss limts,  win goal ( but not  win limit) a certain number  of losses in a row as signals when  to terminate as session.

With all thse safe guards   it is possible to lose  3 sessions. Well then  it was not my day.Tomorrow is another day.

One might lose the first session win  the second as well as the third session and you know what  you will find  that you have  broken even. BE content with that result

What matters  is  DISCIPLINE  to know  when to quit......... either Up or Down.

TAMINO
HAPPY BWINNINGS!!!

Fair enough ND. We i guess come from a different school of betting.  They could be both effective.     The end result is what counts.


Good luck

[Turner]

Is it me ....or are these incredibly naive ways to bet. Crude identical table coverage, what ever the circumstances.
Then again...what do i know 

[Ralph]

It is easy to win 3/4 of the sessions, if you end on plus, and save the loss in one. It is not the same as winning a session and winning.   
And we have to look at time, in a period which can go for month, we can have luck. It use to catch up losses later, take care.

[Tamino]

Is it me ....or are these incredibly naive ways to bet. Crude identical table coverage, what ever the circumstances.
Then again...what do i know 

We would  gladly clarify what is  puzzling  you if you kindly would restate  your  question in more detail.

What is in your opinion  a betting maneuer without naivete`. We are all ears.



Tamino
HAPPY WINNINGS!!
 

[Turner]

We would  gladly clarify what is  puzzling  you if you kindly would restate  your  question in more detail.

What is in your opinion  a betting maneuer without naivete`. We are all ears.



Tamino
HAPPY WINNINGS!!

It just reminds me of the way i used to approach roulette like i had found some magic formula that works for all roulette scenarios.
Ive done far better once i left the magic world of turbogenius roulette systems to actin on very recent information.
Like in chess, pushing a pawn or controlling the centre may be fundamentally correct actions....but not in the particular position you see before you. I am starting to realise the similarities between chess and roulette
The current position you see on the maque denotes how you play.
Static systems like this dont let you afapt to the changing position
Hope that explains where i am at
Turner

[Tamino]

Statistics,Shmastistics, trends  , patterns, charting, shmarting all are meaningless.


Just make the first bet for the method you want to  use. You either come out ahead  or you lose.

That`s  why   playing at a casino  is  called gambling .

Above all select a glamorous casino,with  good restaurants, evening shows , and  charming c***tail waitresses, and you are in seventh heaven.

P.S. Don`t forget to  play a few spins  at the table.

That`s what I call living .


Tamino.

[Turner]

Statistics,Shmastistics, trends  , patterns, charting, shmarting all are meaningless.


Just make the first bet for the method you want to  use. You either come out ahead  or you lose.

That`s  why   playing at a casino  is  called gambling .

Above all select a glamorous casino,with  good restaurants, evening shows , and  charming c***tail waitresses, and you are in seventh heaven.

P.S. Don`t forget to  play a few spins  at the table.

That`s what I call living .


Tamino.

Good on Ya!

[Tamino]

I have made it my business to only plat systems  by bonafide gambling authors  like  Frank Scoblete , Brett Morton, or John Patrick.

I have never played any  method   posted at any forum.

Tamino