The Lions Den

[ginger]

It is true I did it fast in fun mod.  My real mod play is a bit more carefull, nodays, the figures could be real mode, in some more sessions.

Hello Ralph,

I have played RNG in the very beginning , first with fun money and had big wins , after that with real money and it was hopeless.

So I always say...stay away from it.

I play live wheel with real Dealer and use the Dealers Sign. with good results.

You learn to see how Dealers spin the ball and than you noticed that a lot of them mess around a lot of it.

Cheers

John   Rotterdam

[Ralph]

I have used RNG casino for years, see no difference at all from live. Its much faster, and  I can use smaller chip if I want. The spreed  is 1 to 10000 on straight up and tenfold more on EC.
The way I run the game is hardly possible at a live wheel.

The speed in RNG give the impression it is harder than live.

Roulette live or RNG is all hard to beat, without a big part of luck, its a game of chance and unfair odds.

Still it works well, but any day that can change, I am aware of it. I have had my winnings, using traditional methods, no skill involved, its not a skill game.

The game is risky, and no wins without taken it.

It is absolute no different in fun and real mode, both are equal difficult. You may play different in fun. You can allways top up, take other risks, and have a decent bankroll. If you count win/loss % in fun and real and you play exactly the same it differ not. The main fault is many take risks in fun they do not do in real, in real it is aiming for break even. They win in fun using a bankroll of  20000 units, and then deposit 500 units, and expect to do the same results.

A stream of numbers in fun, nobody can point out a diff to a stream of numbers from real mode, or live wheel, many tests are done.

By the way, I do not believe in dealers signature, Its an other name for luck in my opinion.
Now other game give the possibility to read in so much, I do the same, I use repeaters, and now it is just a normal distribution of randomness, still I see patterns, patterns in my brain.
That's the way a human brain works, seeing patterns everywhere,

[MrJ]

"The speed in RNG give the impression it is harder than live" >>> I think most would agree (in regards to RNG) the fairness of it is the MAIN CONCERN, not if its faster or easier to win.

Ken

[Ralph]

The spellchecker do some funny hing, I have two now's, one should be No ande the other know

[Skakus]

The spellchecker do some funny hing, I have two now's, one should be No ande the other know

I think Ego set up the spell checker.

[Proofreaders2000]

Welcome MrE to the Forum     

I play RNG Real money.  Waiting 75 spins before a bet selection can be quite costly.  Most RNGs (at least the ones I've played) you have to bet minimal equal amounts red & black to advance the wheel.  On average after 30 spins I would lose 6-8 units for when the zero hits.

[Ralph]

Welcome MrE to the Forum     

I play RNG Real money.  Waiting 75 spins before a bet selection can be quite costly.  Most RNGs (at least the ones I've played) you have to bet minimal equal amounts red & black to advance the wheel.  On average after 30 spins I would lose 6-8 units for when the zero hits.

Are you losing more tracking, than playing at an EC?  I average you should lose an unit in 37 spins.
Better not play black AND red, play bet one EC, win or lose, that's not more costly.
You win 50% except zero, but lose just one on zero hit.

[ginger]

I have used RNG casino for years, see no difference at all from live. Its much faster, and  I can use smaller chip if I want. The spread  is 1 to 10000 on straight up and tenfold more on EC.
The way I run the game is hardly possible at a live wheel.

The speed in RNG give the impression it is harder than live.

Roulette live or RNG is all hard to beat, without a big part of luck, its a game of chance and unfair odds.

Still it works well, but any day that can change, I am aware of it. I have had my winnings, using traditional methods, no skill involved, its not a skill game.

The game is risky, and no wins without taken it.

It is absolute no different in fun and real mode, both are equal difficult. You may play different in fun. You can allways top up, take other risks, and have a decent bankroll. If you count win/loss % in fun and real and you play exactly the same it differ not. The main fault is many take risks in fun they do not do in real, in real it is aiming for break even. They win in fun using a bankroll of  20000 units, and then deposit 500 units, and expect to do the same results.

A stream of numbers in fun, nobody can point out a diff to a stream of numbers from real mode, or live wheel, many tests are done.

By the way, I do not believe in dealers signature, Its an other name for luck in my opinion.
Now other game give the possibility to read in so much, I do the same, I use repeaters, and now it is just a normal distribution of randomness, still I see patterns, patterns in my brain.
That's the way a human brain works, seeing patterns everywhere,

Hello Ralph,

You don't have to believe in Dealer Sign , you simply have to play it.

And if you do you will change your opinion...I know for sure.

Cheers


John

[Ralph]

Hello Ralph,

You don't have to believe in Dealer Sign , you simply have to play it.

And if you do you will change your opinion...I know for sure.

Cheers


John

If DS is real, the outcome from wheel should not be random, they publish spins from casinos, which can be tested for randomness, in not any case I know in modern time they fail the test.
So I still think DS is an other name for luck, if anybody try something, and it seems to go theire way, it's easy to make conclusion it is something into it. Fore some reason we prefer skill instead of luck.
I do not think  it is possible to predict a fair wheel, and a dealer has no pattern, which you can forsee, our mind can create it afterwards.

You can still win.

[Drazen]

So I still think DS is an other name for luck, if anybody try something, and it seems to go theire way, it's easy to make conclusion it is something into it. Fore some reason we prefer skill instead of luck.
I do not think  it is possible to predict a fair wheel, and a dealer has no pattern, which you can forsee, our mind can create it afterwards.

link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=7201.msg66193#msg66193

Winning with DS isnt luck. But it is to find such conditions...

For some of us luck in roulette comes in a bit different form then one might think;)

Regards

Drazen

[Turner]

I believe in DS. As soon as i see mario on t2 in my casino i bet tiers. I usually get £30 out of him

[Tamino]

LUCK :

When preparation meets opportunity .




Tamino

[Ralph]

This you may try out yourself, I have never succeed, but I heard some know it.
Spending days.

If yo just at the momnet the ball falls at BVZ, use a secret key combination, you have to be at the right fraction of a second , it possible to postpone a 100 Euro on the winning number. Its called "Unlock".

[Ralph]

I thought I should get a fast reply, to the joke, but all may be busy testing the keyboard!

[F_LAT_INO]

"The speed in RNG give the impression it is harder than live" >>> I think most would agree (in regards to RNG) the fairness of it is the MAIN CONCERN, not if its faster or easier to win.

Ken

---That's what I preach for long now.Some others preach diff.stories in a parrot
    fashion, only after quick profit.