Touching Neighbours

[Jordsie669]

Hello, first of all I want to thank Turner because he gave me this idea from his post "Touching numbers".
First of all this system requires "neighbours" on the roulette table (it would make it a lot easier though).
Let the wheel spin without betting 'till you have 2 touching numbers on the neighbours,
then put one unit on all the numbers on the neighbours EXCEPT that 2 touching numbers.
The chance is high that you will win, and if you lose you can use martingale (or any kind of progression that would work)
I would recommend a bankroll of 1000+ units (you would need one of the 2 numbers to come up 5 times to lose the progression, which would be extremely rare!)

Can someone test this for the long run, or code it in RX?
Cheers, Jordsie.

[Jordsie669]

With touching numbers on the neighbours I mean for example:
0 and 26
27 and 6
10 and 5
10 and 23

Cheers.

[Jordsie669]

Oh shit, martingale wouldn't work
example:
BET: 35, LOST
BET 70, WON
-------------------
BANKROLL: -31

Does anyone know a progression that works with number betting???

[Le_Chiffre]

for 5 numbers, bet amount on each number

1 unit for 7 spins
6 units for 5 spins
11 units for 3 spins
16 units for 2 spins

[Jordsie669]

for 5 numbers, bet amount on each number

1 unit for 7 spins
6 units for 5 spins
11 units for 3 spins
16 units for 2 spins

But with my system you always bet on 35 numbers, does anyone have an idea?

[Le_Chiffre]

sorry, i thought you were just doing neighbours....but now i see youre doing the whole wheel minus 2 numbers

[Jordsie669]

So does anyone have an idea for a progression?

[Skakus]

 
Playing 35 numbers is ridiculous. You won’t need a progression, you’ll need a rope and a rafter.

[Orochi]

Playing 35 numbers is ridiculous. You won’t need a progression, you’ll need a rope and a rafter.

Jordsie669 please don't post  HANGMAN system ideas.

[soggett]

Playing 35 numbers is ridiculous. You won’t need a progression, you’ll need a rope and a rafter.

I am sorry but I have to agree with skakus
for a chance to be positive you would have to bet
1 unit
then 36 unit per number - 1295 units total for 2 spins and a chance to win 1 unit
hope you get the point and where this is heading

[Jordsie669]

Hmmm... 
Can't we tweak this system in any way?

Cheers, Jordsie.

[Roughy]

Hmmm... 
Can't we tweak this system in any way?

Cheers, Jordsie.

No, IMHO it's madness! The only way to play is with your fingers, toes and eyes crossed for a couple of spins in the hope you don't get caught! But is it worth betting 35u to win 1? I really don't think so, and don't think any "tweaking" will help.

Roughy

[Le_Chiffre]

the only hope is to find a casino where you can bet 0.01 units with a VERY high table limit.  Even then it could get risky....and it'll take a LONG time to make any worth while money.

[Jordsie669]

Okay, what about doing this method without progression, just accepting loss.
Maybe the winnings overcome the losses?

EDIT: You could decrease the loss with waiting for 3 touching numbers.