The One

[buffalowizard]

This One has got me excited.

Its essentially an even chance bet with the double streets.

Record the DS in 2 columns, making it easier to track. Example:

3 1
5 2
1 3
6 4...

Now here's the bet selection part:

Wait until two DS hit that are next to each other in any order
Eg. 1,2
      4,3
      5,6
      3,2
      1,6
      5,4

1 and 6 are neighbours in this bet, that's why they are included

Now when two DS are neighbouring like this, we bet wait a spin and them bet that the next DS won't be neighbouring - as usual I probably don't explain it well enough so here's an example

4,3 here's a trigger as they are neighbours
2 <after DS 2 spins, bet DS 4,5,6 as the 3 remaining DS are neighbours. 2 of course is a repeat itself
5,2 no bet as not neighbours
3,3 repeat, which counts as neighbours
1 < bet DS 3,4,5 here
4,5
6 < bet 2,3,4
3,2
5 < bet 1,2,3

The hit rate is fantastic, so far, good enough for flat bet

All questions welcome!

[amk]

Really like this one Buffalowizard!


Perhaps a +1/-1 prog can help at times?

[RFMAXX]

thank you for this.

after betting: do we wait for a new trigger (wait for new two ds to hit)?

[buffalowizard]

amk, yes I think that progression would be ideal.

Maxx yes retrack after a win anew.

I'll post up samples soon guys of the method of play

[RFMAXX]

I'll post up samples soon guys of the method of play

[TwoCatSam]

Now when two DS are neighbouring like this, we bet wait a spin and them bet that the next DS won't be neighbouring - as usual I probably don't explain it well enough so here's an example


Is the red bet an extra word?  A typo?  Are we betting they will or won't be neighbors, as the blue indicates?

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4,3 here's a trigger as they are neighbours
2 <after DS 2 spins, bet DS 4,5,6 as the 3 remaining DS are neighbours. 2 of course is a repeat itself

In the above example, are you betting on the 4,5,6 because they are neighbors of each other?


5,2 no bet as not neighbours



3,3 repeat, which counts as neighbours
1 < bet DS 3,4,5 here

In the above, why not the 2,3,4 or 4,5,6?  I don't get it.


Sam

[cofi]

That word bet is redundant.

The idea was (after a neighbouring pair of DS) to wait one more spin, and then bet against forming of another pair of neighbours thereupon.

[TwoCatSam]

Thanks, cofi

So

3,4
1...................we have to bet the three DS that do not make a neighbor or a repeat.    6,1 would not work.  1,2 would not work. 1,1 would not work.   So we bet the 3,4,5?

Is that it?

Sam

[cofi]

U'r welcome.

Exactly. Another example:

5, 4

3

2 & 4 are neighbors, 3 is a repeat, so bet 1, 5, 6

That's the idea.

[TwoCatSam]

This may be interesting enough to try.

It's an oddity following an oddity!

TwoCat

[ego]

-

Well i test this idea and i can not say i got fantastic results.
I am pretty sure i did it correct.

Would be nice if some one else could test this.

[buffalowizard]

Correct Cofi and correct Ego. Sorry guys but this one sunk

[buffalowizard]

Been looking at it as there are many variations of this and I like the selection.

I've done 3 columns now.

Wait for first two columns to be touching

Bet that the third column will also be touching

Again it's a 3 DS bet

1 6 <these two are touching so bet 1,6,5
2 4 < no bet
4 5 < bet 4,5,6

Seems that touching DS like to remain touched for one more spin. Sweet eh!

[Turner]

Been looking at it as there are many variations of this and I like the selection.

I've done 3 columns now.

Wait for first two columns to be touching

Bet that the third column will also be touching

Again it's a 3 DS bet

1 6 <these two are touching so bet 1,6,5
2 4 < no bet
4 5 < bet 4,5,6

Seems that touching DS like to remain touched for one more spin. Sweet eh!

As you know, i like touching....but I'm no Jimmy Saville 

Ill give it 100 spins and post.

[buffalowizard]

 
Your touching inspired me Turner