The Centre Pair

[ilukan]

this seems fun
thanks buff.

when do you start tracking again? or do you stick to it until you get tired? I'm planning to play with this when i get lazy hehehe

Don't do it for real as have tested all 6 possible combos flat bet,long ago, and they all lose on the long run....but would mostly work with D'Alamb.larger BR

[rayhd63]

That's perfect Ray, you got the hang of it
How have your tests been going so far mate?

just wantet to make sure I got it right. Now I am going on with testing.
Will let you know.  Any Progression recomondations ?!?

Don't do it for real as have tested all 6 possible combos

What combos ?!?


Ray

[rayhd63]

Hey Buff,

please have a look at my sheet... There must be something wrong......

Looks tooo good 

Ray

P.S. Please don't disappoint me and find an error 

[GLC]

Hey Buff,

please have a look at my sheet... There must be something wrong......

Looks tooo good 

Ray

P.S. Please don't disappoint me and find an error 

Looks like the biggest drawdown was 372 units.  What do you think for a buy-in?  500? 750? 1000?


How different is this from just playing the penultimate dozen?  1 unit covers 12 numbers so the buy-in should be much lower with very similar results.  We'd play it the same way.  Wait until all three dozens hit and then bet the penultimate dozen.


Not trying to knock this system, just trying to assess whether there's enough of a hit rate improvement to justify the extra units to cover 6 streets with 6 units instead of 4 streets with 1 unit?


Just wondering.


GLC

[buffalowizard]

@ray,
It looks correct to me- so I'd say that was a very good session! We're you just doing +/- 1 progression?

@GLC
You are right and probably no difference but it's fun and we hope in vain that these selections create different outcomes.

[ilukan]

just wantet to make sure I got it right. Now I am going on with testing.
Will let you know.  Any Progression recomondations ?!?


What combos ?!?


Ray

1/2-1/3-1/4-2/4-3/4....and the one you are about is 2/3..in other words doing it in circles---
1/2=last/penultimate--1/3 last/ sec.penultimate,1/4 last/furthest,2/3 penultimate/sec.penultimate,2/4 penultimate/furthest,3/4,sec.penultimate/furthest....as they mostly in move changing,and one advantageous
thing in this bet is that it rarely goes into long inbalances.

[rayhd63]

It looks correct to me- so I'd say that was a very good session! We're you just doing +/- 1 progression?

Yes, +1 on a loss and -1 on a win. As soon as latest high is reached , set units to 1.


@ George

Wait until all three dozens hit and then bet the penultimate dozen

Could you give me a quick update , or where I can find that method ?!?

Ray

[TwoCatSam]

Just plucked a day off Spielbank................

[buffalowizard]

Not a bad day at the office!

Maybe this does have legs after all

[TwoCatSam]

Wiz

The sheet says to bet, say, 45.  What is 4 and 5.  Are you breaking the carpet down into lines (double streets)?  If, are you only betting a dozen?  I thought it was an EC bet.

Sam

[ilukan]

Me too.....carpet divided on 4,betting always 2 and 3 in circles....that's why I mentioned above that have tested all 6 possible combos of this bet,flat bet,and neither works on the long run.....but all work 1+1-
as there are not long imbalances in any......so whenever in plus swap the combo....2/3 won,go to 2/4 and
so on in circles......it is how was tested lon ago....and it does have legs,6 in fact.

[buffalowizard]

Wiz

The sheet says to bet, say, 45.  What is 4 and 5.  Are you breaking the carpet down into lines (double streets)?  If, are you only betting a dozen?  I thought it was an EC bet.

Sam

Sam,
The system is based on 4 sectors of 9. 3 single streets each. Therefore two of those sectors equal the 18 number EC bet

Sector 1:1-9
2: 10-18
3: 19-27
4: 27-36

[TwoCatSam]

Got it.

Thanks

[ilukan]

Not a bad day at the office!

Maybe this does have legs after all

Except that is done all wrong....why don't you correct Sams sheet BW....not done as you explained
in your first post.......

[buffalowizard]

Except that is done all wrong....why don't you correct Sams sheet BW....not done as you explained
in your first post.......

Would if i had excel.
Follow Rays sheet instead, I'm pretty sure this method is clear now

Cheers