• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

thomweh. 4 numbers.

Started by Dane, Aug 31, 06:55 AM 2014

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Dane

 On some German forums ("DC´s Campus net" and "rouletteforum.de")
thomweh has presented "vielversprechende Strategie auf 4 pleins".  Meaning
"Most promising strategy on 4 numbers". I think it deserves to be presented right here too!
Though I do not support progressions after losing; but who knows: Mayby this strategy
can produce a profit after flat betting too.

Anyway, thomweh seeks four numbers that have occured EXACTLY twice.
If any of those numbers comes a third time during the search,
this number is abandoned.
The four repeats must not belong to the same colour. And they must not all be
Even, Odd, High or Low. Four repeats from the SAME group of 18 numbers
means that thomweh  restarts his search
And if ZERO is among the candidates, the other three
should not belong to the SAME group of 18 numbers.

When four numbers have been chosen, he only bets these
until a hit or until he has lost twenty times.
Progression: 8 X 1 chip per number
                   4 X 2 chips
'                  3 X 3    -
                   2 X 4    -
                   2 X 5    -
                   1 X 6    -  .
NO NEGATIVE PROGRESSION ADDICT

muggins

From the look of the selection process I suspect there are going to be some very long waits between bets.
Begin each day as though you think it is your last, you never know when you will be right.

Dane

Quote from: muggins on Aug 31, 10:01 AM 2014
From the look of the selection process I suspect there are going to be some very long waits between bets.

After having selected 4 numbers we bet those
WITHOUT INTERRUPTION
twenty times or until we win.
So the waiting time is in the beginning.
NO NEGATIVE PROGRESSION ADDICT

bleep24

Have checked this with my records of Live dealer spins from Wm. Hill casino.   The waiting until the criteria is met will be  boring but on what I have found from my limited spin history well worthwhile.    I found won on spin 1.  next series won on spin 3.  next on 1. next on 3. next on 1. next 4. next on 3. next on 1. next on 3. next on 3. next on 1. next on 2. next on 1. next on 3. next on 7. next on 3. next on 1. next on 3. next on 1. next on 2. next on 1. Next on 4. next on 3. next on 1.   That`s all I`ve checked so far but pretty impressive and no losses so if winning continues in this sort of way then an occasional total loss is not going to be too much of a disaster on the bank.  A win after 1 spin equals 32 units.  I reckon that the total of all the above results is 616 units.  I estimate playing would total between 15 and 20 hours.  I used the criteria apart from when all numbers were same colour, high/low, odd/even then discarded first number recorded and looked for a replacement number instead of starting all over again and on this showing that worked.   This would not need progression if results continue in this way but I am sure there will be a loss around the corner.  Could possibly be run with short term betting whilst recording spins to get the 4 trigger numbers.

bleep24

Have checked some more Live dealer spins and the results are:    won on 5th spin  (total spins from start of recording to winner - 25)
won  on 7th spin (total spins to winner - 36)   won on lst spin  (total spins to winner - 45)  won on 7th spin  (total spins to winner - 31)
won on 8th spin  (total spins to winner - 39)         Whilst checking this because of the way the numbers were coming out I feel it will be best to play just 1 series at a table until a winner (or loss - aagh!) and then move to another table if you wish to continue playing.  This is because there could be some overhang from 1st series when starting to record numbers for the next. I did find that quite a lot of numbers repeated and then came out again meaning they had to be discarded.

Good luck.   

Turner

welcome to the forum Bleep.

I see you are from Guisborough

Ventured up to Whitby many times from a Scarborough holiday  :thumbsup:


bleep24

Thanks Turner, it`s nice to be welcomed. Funnily enough I do not get to Whitby or Scarborough much.   I like the North York Moors  (Especially NYM railway - I`m a massive fan of heritage steam railways and real cask ales) Also visit Yorkshire Dales a lot (More steam railways and real ale) Will it never end!.     On a different tack, what is your favourite roulette system and more importantly, does it win?  Next post I`ll let you know my favourite system.   Got it off here actually.

Good luck.

Brian   (Bleep24)         

Turner

I like an idea to make sense. Repeaters, warm numbers. EC's when considering SD and regression to mean.
Im not one for matrices and patterns.

Mr J catch the 8 train makes perfect sense..and Ralphs lucky seven. Although Two Cat Sam named it that.

A lot of Ego's stuff is (IMO) beautiful.

I cant find a "hmmm" moment in this idea from Dane re: Thomweh 4 numbers, though 4 numbers means you have time to see a down turn in time to not loose too much. That makes sense.

But I repeat this little ditty a lot. Progression is an admission that the bet selection wasnt good enough...although short cycles of 1 2 2 on EC wont get you into too much trouble.

rouletteKEY

Quote from: Turner on Oct 17, 03:32 PM 2014
Progression is an admission that the bet selection wasnt good enough
I like to think of moderate progressions as a way for a good bet selection to make ALOT more money in a shorter period of time (both negative and positive)...also very efficient with stop losses in place so as not to get obliterated on a RFH.

I will have to look at this method a little more but it struck me as essentially XXVV WF4's with a few more qualifiers regarding the numbers diversity in regards to the EC's

Playing twice hit numbers for the third strike has been a solid play for me for years...I just approach it a little different and never ever chase as far out as 20 spins


Dane

I have just read on the German forum "DC´s Campus"
that thomweh has just written his final letter to the "Monster thread".
AND A MONSTER THREAD IT IS: 54 PAGES!

He announces that he has found a better method
to be introduced soon in a new thread there.
NO NEGATIVE PROGRESSION ADDICT

-