Comparing 3 different types of bets

[nowun]

Correct me if I am wrong, but this progression does not seem right:

3/2, 9/6, 33/22, 74/36, 240/160, 600/400

Look at step 4, it loses 2 chips each time the third dozen hits, you only win if the Low hits or the high hits depending on which way you have it around, it seems out of proportion.  All of the other numbers are 3/2.

[RouletteGhost]

I used to play 1st half and last dozen a while back. The key trick is wait for 2 consecutive virtual losses in a row then start. Wait for 19 thru 24 to hit twice in a row and vice versa

I like a light progression where a win will get you closer to a break even point rather then a total recover, this works because with many more wins then losses you will recover. Forget the progression that brings u positive after a loss. The progression gets too drastic. Just increase units slightly and you'll come back

[rouletteKEY]

All systems fail but we keep trying is there something wrong with all of us?

What I see at the tables is many people "snatching defeat from the jaws of victory"

People get up...

often ...

regardless of whether they are scattering chips in many cases or playing a method...but they just don't know when to quit...and they end up losing.  Just an ongoing observation.

[RouletteGhost]

Roulette key happens to me every time. Greed takes over and nothing is good enough. I'd aim for 100 and when I hit 100 I'd say 100 more and try for 200. I'd always lose

I had a system on American roulette I'd bet the 5 numbers on either side of the zeros plus the zeros. A 22 number bet.

I won 100 a day for a week straight and on the 5th day I hit a bad string and instead of stopping at 100 and walking away I tried to recover and lost

If I stuck to my 100 goal of be up

[RouletteGhost]

ego

your progression would cause you to be a winner everytime

but the problem is the spread

say you play online $1 base bets, for instance on celtic casino $1 minimum on 1st dozen only lets you increase to $25 limit

at my local casino you can bet $5 on 1st dozen but the max is $200 therefore u can never do the 74/36 bet

great progression but i dont believe any table have this spread of minimums and maximums

[RouletteGhost]

p.s. i just ran 10 simulations on test my strategy of 1,000 spins each and 1 of 5,000 spins and he is RIGHT

the MAX consecutive loses was 4 at a time

we can make this work!

edit: if we can find a casino that allows such a minimum and maximum spread

[warrior]

This is the best bet selection I can find for covering 35/37 numbers:
18 Low
12 Dozen Three
4 Quad 19,20,22,23
1 Number 24

It's not as convenient as the others though. I will test this system with numbers and different progressions and see what results I come up with. The basic concept is that covering most of the board is more affordable, but the progression needs to effectively recover from:
All but 6 numbers: 8 losses
All but 3 numbers: 6 losses
All but 2 numbers: 5 losses

ego's system is based on this concept, but the progression seems to be reason why it's showing a losing streak in the above graphs; the progression is staggered so it relies on stability following a losing streak, but most times the chaos continues with a storm of mini losing streaks.

And your point to betting all those numbers is what.

[falkor]

It's all part of a new system I've got in mind:
Wait for 6 numbers to come in (1) then wait for another 8 spins (2). If the 8 spins contain only those 6 previous numbers then flat bet one unit on the opposite (3).
Wait for 3 numbers to come in (1) then wait for another 6 spins (2). If the 6 spins contain only those 3 previous numbers then flat bet one unit on the opposite (3).
Wait for 2 numbers to come in (1) then wait for another 5 spins (2). If the 5 spins contain only those 2 previous numbers then flat bet one unit on the opposite (3).

In step (3) you could also wait for 1 spin less then use a 2-step progression.

Above is only 3 triggers, but my system will be looking for at least 500!

[ddarko]

edit: if we can find a casino that allows such a minimum and maximum spread

& that's the reason casino has table limits to suit themselves !!!!!

[RouletteGhost]

Yeap. No doubt betting high and first dozen wont miss more than 4 times in a row

But there is no progression we could use without hitting the limits

Perhaps theres another way since the wins outweigh the losses

[RouletteGhost]

if you wait for 2 virtual losses then begin it is infalliable

why do i say that? ego is right. ive tested countless spins and if choosing 1-18 and 3rd dozen or 19-36 and 1st dozen the losses will not exceed 4. as ego stated no such thing as 5 misses and if it was to happen it would be a once in a lifetime event

wait for 2 virtual losses (i tested this and it doesnt take too long, about 40 times in 1,000 spins it happens) then begin

with $5 units you would not hit maximum bets

you can alternate between 1-18/3rd dozen and 19-36/1st dozen depending what has missed 2 times in a row

wait for 2 misses then begin with following bets:

spin 3- 15/10 (3 chips/2 chips)
spin 4- 45/30 (9 chips/6 chips)
spin 5- 165/110 (33 chips/22 chips)

you all better listen up you have a winning system in front of your eyes

a few days ago i said maybe the key to betting roulette is a SIMPLE strategy

[RouletteGhost]

real live wheel

if playing 1-18 and 3rd dozen, we had 4 misses in a row of 19-24

[JimmieB]

I hoped you at least waited for 2 VL's!!

Also, maybe a daft questions, what's the difference in waiting for any DS to show, once, twice, whatever, then bet the other five, it's still 5 units, in fact on the tables I play, due to min bets, this bet would only cost me 5 units, whereas the 3 on 1-18/19/-38 and 2 on the relevant dozen would cost me 25 units...

Jim

[gorki]

"Yeap. No doubt betting high and first dozen wont miss more than 4 times in a row"

live spin 5800 spin

[RouletteGhost]

is there a more gentler progression then

3/2
9/6
33/22