Testing Gambler's Fallacy - part 2

[falkor]

Look above though - there are always more wins than losses because of the tracking!

Right now its just using 11 steps Martingale regardless of win/losses, so resets after the 10th double-up.

[RouletteGhost]

the losing streaks are rare with this

the worst part is waiting for 4 or 5 losses in a row, can take forever.

the best way i found to play it it wait for a few virtual losses then flat bet it 5 times. if up wait for another trigger. if down, double up and flat bet it another 5 times

wait for some virtual losses then:

1 1 1 1 1 if down move up
2 2 2 2 2 if down move up
3 3 3 3 3 if down move up
4 4 4 4 4 if down move up

[falkor]

It won't take forever by the time I've finished designing this system. Here we are only testing the concept of Gambler's Fallacy - past data doesn't affect the future - but it seems it does!

See attached: I've now doubled the amount of wins per 1 mill (Total Wins: 974, Total Losses: 973). If that progression was played right it would be capitalising on all these wins.

You can see that flat betting does not make the same as parlay type bets when we know more wins will result.

[RouletteGhost]

I think waiting for 4 virtual losses then flat betting 5 times would work. Id like to see that tested