• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Dane´s JAW OF THE THIRDS

Started by Dane, Dec 03, 03:53 AM 2014

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

psimoes

Quote from: Dane on Dec 04, 11:27 AM 2014
Yes, take a coffee break! Read back my posts!
And look at this:

We have just worked on single numbers.
It´s time for splits or cheveaux.

34...In DS 31-36 I start betting split (cheval) 31-34.
6.... In DS  1-6    -  -       -         -    3-6
29...In DS 25-30 -   -       -        -     26-29
1....As you might have guessed, I divided DS 1-6 into THREE splits: 1-4, 2-5 and 3-6.
      This double street or six line has appeared more than once. So I leave it and stop betting the earliest chosen split there!

2
27...Two of the six well known DS have each appeared more than once. So this session ends here.

Now let´s try the procedure on DS.
We divide 1-18 into THREE THIRDS: 1-6, 7-12 and 13-18.
  -     -    19-36  -       -          -      : 19-24, 25-30 and 31-36.

34...Start betting DS 31-36.
6..... -        -       DS 1-6.
29....Area 19-36 has appeared more than once. We leave it and its earliest DS.
1.....  -      1-18    -       -           -       -       -   .  -    -      -    -   -      -       DS.
          This time we won.

Time for a cup of coffee  :)

Cheers! Posting can be consuming.
Iḿ trying to get the reasoning right: Weŕe dealing with multiples or dividers of three, depending on the aspect of the game? With streets, because there are 12, we start over every four outcomes unless we win early? A yes or no answer is enough as Iḿ going for the second cup...
[Math+1] beats a Math game

TwoCatSam

psimoes

My wife and I go to Riverwind Casino in Norman, Oklahoma, to play the Roulette Evolution RNG "wheel".  It spins every 30 seconds, ready or not!

The minimum is .25 or a quarter, American.  I do not know the upper limits as it would be very difficult to place a large bet.  The layout takes .25, 1.00 and 2.00.  If you bet $20.00, you'd have to hit the $200 chip ten times.  And it always tries to put a chip on a split or corner--never where you want it.  Very aggravating, but a fair RNG.

I am not going to speak for Dane, but I think you have it a tad on the wrong side.  Read his first post very carefully.  He does not give "clues".   ::)

P.S.  I think you're wrong on this part:  we start over every four outcomes unless we win early?  I now feel an overwhelming urge to shut up!!   ;D

Samster
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

psimoes

I understand the part about diving streets or DS by 3, Iḿ failing big time to see the reasoning behind all the "when two streets hit more than once" thing. My fault, it seems arbitrary. Need a rest after typing all that crap last night.

My wife was always against my gambling habits. She wouldn't hear anything about it, but then when I lost all the money that I had "stolen" from the casino she got really angry, despite the bank account had returned to where it was before I started. Female logic anyone?

Sam, careful with RNG. After you win some it switches to PMG mode. Premeditated Number Generating.
What I used to beat it was playing for very little time on one machine, cash the winnings and choose another machine.
You never know what info is in that barcode, so when you leave one machine, change the card for real money and start over.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

RouletteGhost

I have roulette  at my local casino with a real wheel and ball in a glass bubble and bets are placed on a screen

That is not rng
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

Cant wait to hear the results for this

I will try my next trip
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

psimoes

I got the rules now (sorry)! How's everyone doing with this system? If it works, 5% is an incredible edge regardless I agree with it or not!
[Math+1] beats a Math game

RouletteGhost

Looks like you bet the numbers as they come and if another number in the same street appears stop betting that number
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

psimoes

[Math+1] beats a Math game

psimoes

No, you stop betting the entire street! Consider every street as a little game of dozens, since every street has three numbers.  Everytime a street hits, it means the house had won the first bet. Probability tells us for the house to win a second time in that little game it loses an edge of near 5%. So we start betting on any number in that street hoping the next time that same street hits we win the game, since the edge is on our side.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

RouletteGhost

I got that part. But dane said he bet the same number not another number in the street. No?
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

psimoes

One interesting thing: everytime we bet on a single dozen the casino bets a double dozen against us. OTOH if we bet on a double dozen the casino bets the single dozen against us (interestingly they always flat-bet). We have 2/3 chance of winning the first battle, but we'll lose more than 4% edge to the house, on the second.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

psimoes

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Dec 04, 09:33 PM 2014
I got that part. But dane said he bet the same number not another number in the street. No?

Yes, he said that.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

RouletteGhost

Confusing strategy lol. So many ways it can be interpreted. Dane elaborate please lol
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Dane

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Dec 04, 09:42 PM 2014
Confusing strategy lol. So many ways it can be interpreted. Dane elaborate please lol

Yes, I have you all between my CLAWS, haven´t I?  >:D
Confusing? Not to me!
It is the early worm that catches the bird  :girl_to: or something like that.
The session is usually short because I bet the EARLIEST number in any street only (if I have chosen to bet on single numbers).
Within the street I beg for a repeat of the earliest number. And I leave that region of three (that street) as soon as it comes again.

The reason for ending the session when TWO streets have reappeared should be obvious if you look at this once more:

                                            1-(2/3)^2 = 0.5555555555555555.

I have taken the liberty to split the two outcomes into TWO streets (if I have chosen to bet on single numbers).
And I have tried to show you how to bet cheval and DS.  Please read back my posts, if you are still insecure.

In my examples  so far I have not bet street - only treated street as a region with THREE numbers.
If I wanted to bet street, I accordingly would divide area 1-36 into four like this:

1-3, 4-6, 7-9/ 10-12, 13-15, 16-18/ 19-21, 22-24, 25-27/ 28-30, 31-33, 34-36.

There are exactly THREE streets in each area. Surprised? Then you haven´t  really got a clue!

Thanks for the overwhelming interest and good luck to Sam and others who  might already have rushed in
to the Casino  :)
                                                          DANE


NO NEGATIVE PROGRESSION ADDICT

psimoes

Quote from: Dane on Dec 05, 03:16 AM 2014
The reason for ending the session when TWO streets have reappeared should be obvious if you look at this once more:

                                            1-(2/3)^2 = 0.5555555555555555.

I have taken the liberty to split the two outcomes into TWO streets (if I have chosen to bet on single numbers).
It's not obvious yet. 2/3 is the same as 8/12, not 2/12, or even 4/12 counting on two streets repeating. If you take that liberty you won't gain any edge. If you win it's due to luck only. Is it just me?
[Math+1] beats a Math game

-