Silverthorne tracker roulette

[mogul397]

Anyone have this and tried it?
I have it and find it pretty doable.  Am testing it
with success.

Anyone else try int?

[Chrisbis]

Hi.
Never heard of it.
Please tell us more about this tracker and what its tracking.
Cheers

[helena]

Published in 2013, another Silverthorne publication.  199 pages.

Quote from book: "With Tracker Roulette you will only be making even money (outside bets) at roulette. You can pick which pair of even money bets you like â€" red and black, odd and even or high and low. I prefer betting on colors (red and black) and all of the examples in this book use bets on the colors."

[JimmieB]

Attached if anyone is interested, and no, thankfully I didn't pay for it. Like most of the Silverstone methods, they are ok, however, the win rate isn't anywhere as near as quoted...surprise, surprise, I looked at most them when I started playing/studying roulette.

Take this one for example, if I understand it correctly, your game could be over after 5 straight losses, which as we all know, is pretty easy to manage when betting ECs.

Jim

[Roulette player]

Thx.

[GLC]

I've looked at this tracker before.  It's basically a good idea.  Not foolproof though. 

Like Iggiv says "progressions can't overcome the house edge."

[Azim]

I've looked at this tracker before.  It's basically a good idea.  Not foolproof though. 

Like Iggiv says "progressions can't overcome the house edge."

When you say foolproof, is there room for improvement?

Instead of reading the whole PDF, can you briefly explain the tracker?

[GLC]

First of all the name tracker is a little misleading.  There's no tracker per se.  The system is called a tracker.
If you want to know how to play the bet selection and progressions, you must read those sections of the book.  They're the only parts that are important.  The rest is filler that we all should know.

There are 3 stages of progressions.  Fast Profits, Rapid Recovery and Profit Multiplier.

Basically you start playing the Fast Profits progression which is a (1-2-5-8-12) bet line.  If you lose a couple of times playing this line, you jump to the Rapid Recovery progression (2-4-10).  A win on any of these three bets and you jump back to the Fast Profits line at the next bet level as if you hadn't had any losses.  If you win 4 times in a row in the Fast Profits line, you jump to the Profit Multiplier line (2-2-3-4-6-8-10).  A loss here and you're back to the Fast Profits line.  That's a nutshell summary.  The numbers are mine based on $1 units. 

My summary.  You start betting using a pretty basic bet line and you have two directions you can go depending on how you're doing.  If your winning, you move to a bet line that is more stable but nets you good profit.  If you do bad, you jump to an aggressive bet line that recovers your 2 losses quickly and jumps you back to your base bet line.

Any time you have enough losses to reach the end of a line, you just reset to your Fast Profits line.

So, you start with a moderate risk line and if you're doing well, you move to a less risky line so as not to give back all your winnings.  But if you hit a couple of losses in a row, you jump to an aggressive bet line that has high risk, but if you get lucky you will recover your recent losses and can jump back to your basic line.

I don't have time to get more precise in my explanation.  Just read the chapters on bet selection and bet progressions and work through the examples and you have all the explanation you will need.

I admit that it takes a few readings including the examples to get a firm handle on the system, but with perseverance you will come out understanding it.

Is it worth the effort?  I've never tested it enough to decide one way or the other.

GLC

[Azim]

Thank you. I will read the 2 chapter's.

Bottom line looks like the progression is the key to the bet selection.

Last question:
Could the progression be applied to any other bet selection or is it only use able with the bet selection mentioned?

[GLC]

Azim,  This is the type progression that works with any bet selection that resembles a D'Alembert more than a Martingale.  This doesn't work for bet selections where you're trying to hit a result within a certain number of bets and if we do, we reset back to the start.  A lot of the matrix systems use the martingale type progression where we're looking for a win within 3 or 4 or 5 bets else our bet size starts getting too large.

It's more for small steps up and down a bet line.  I think the Author's bet selection method would work just fine.  Or maybe the Wrangler.

GLC

[Azim]

Thanks Again.

Ok. Let me read the 2 chapter's.

/////////////////Modified//////////////////////

Just read a couple of pages. This is the same as Jagger formula.

I am currently trying this, but it's not working out.
I am trying a couple of other progression and trying to make a differential betting.

I will be honest, I am planning to use this in a bot where I have to make a bet every 7-8 spins.

However, my latest conclusion is to use the betting system but only flat bet. Cover my losses with inside number bankroll.