• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

ego's march

Started by ego, Jan 07, 07:44 AM 2016

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ego

Now we aim to play singles and series of two and series of three and higher.
Series of three and higher is the same group or categorie.

Now if you playing on rolling basis then your first bet is to follow the last hit and when you have two hits you follow the latest two.
When you get three uniq hits you will have three loses and then continue to follow the last two.

You will most of times win within 6 attempts if you play on a rolling basis as 6 alternating with 1 in 3 probability is very rare.
Or you can start playing after three alternating.

If you can come up with other ways to follow the domination, then feel free to create your own triggers.

1) Playing after three alternating
2) Playing on a rolling basis
3) Playing after one combination fall into sleep
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego


Here is one example playing on rolling basis:

2
1
1 L
2
2 L
2 L
1
1 W
2
1 L
1 L
1 L
2
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 L
2 W
2 L
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 W
2 L
1 W
1 L
2 W
2 L
2 L
1
1 W
1
2
2 W
2
2
1
2 L
1 W
1 L
1 W
1
1
1
2
1 W
1 L
1 W
1
1
2
1 W
1 L
1 W
1
2
1 W
1 L
1 W
2
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 W
2
2
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

malcop

Hi ego,

Could you please expand in more detail how you played the above example.

Maybe just a play by play of the first 10 or 20 results if you don't want to do the whole thing.

Thanks

malcop

TwoCatSam

I second malcop's motion.
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

ego


Malcom and all - i test this with RX and i belive this march is better then all others - like FTL DBL and so on - because you have 1 in 3 probability and play the same way as with dozen or column bets and we know how common there is that two dozen/column dominate - rare is when they alternate - so i play the latest two most present events flat betting for 300 trails and its a slow grinder - i belive 111 222 333 444 progression would work with this march.



Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

I add a youtube video playing the march with RX .... flat betting ...

link:s://youtu.be/BaZTS3arorc

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

RouletteGhost

320 spin and largest drawdown -2

Sounds good to me
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

ego


Amazing how effective this march is - i post some results so you can understand the betting.
Todays random org file.

1
2
2 L 1 -1
2
2
2
1
2 W 1 +0
2 L 1 -1
2 W 1 +0
2
1
1 L 1 -1
1 W 1 +0
2
2 L 1 -1
2 W 1 +0
2
2
2
1
1 L 1 -1
1 W 1 +0
2
2 L 1 -1
1 L 1 -2
2 L 1 -3
1 W 1 -2
2 W 1 -1
1 W 1 +0
2 W 1 +1
1 W 1 +2
2 W 1 +3
1 W 1 +4
1 L 1 +3
1 L 1 +2
1
2
1 W 1 +4
2 W 1 +5
1 W 1 +6
1 L 1 +5
1 W 1 +6
2
1 W 1 +7
1 L 1 +6
1 W 1 +7
1
1
2
2 L 1 +6
2 W 1 +7
2
1
2 W 1 +8
1 W 1 +9
2 W 1 +10
1 W 1 +11
2 W 1 +12
1 W 1 +13
1 L 1 +12
1 W 1 +13
1
1
2
2 L 1 +12
2 W 1 +13
1
2 W 1 +14
2 L 1 +13
1 L 1 +12
2 W 1 +13
1 W 1 +14
2 W 1 +15
2 L 1 +14
1 W 1 +15
2 W 1 +16
1 W 1 +17
1 L 1 +16
1 L 1 +15
2
1 W 1 +16
1 L 1 +15
1 W 1 +16
2
1 W 1 +17
2 W 1 +18
1 W 1 +19
2 W 1 +20
1 W 1 +21
2 W 1 +22
2 L 1 +21
2 W 1 +22
2
1
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 W
2
1 W
1 L
2 L
2 L
1 W
1 L
1 L
1
2
2 W
2
2
2
2
1
2 L
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
2
2 L
2 W
2
2
2
2
1
1 L
2 L
2 W
1
1 W
1
1
2
1 L
1 L
1 W
2
2 L
2 W
2
1
1 L
2 L
2 W
2
2
2
1
1 W
1
1
2
1 L
2 W
2 L
2 W
1
2 W
2 L
1 L
2 W
2 L
2 L
1
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 W
2
1 W
1 L
1 W
2
2 L
1 L
2 L
2 L
1 W
1 L
2 W
2 L
1 W
1 L
2 W
2 L
2 L
2
1
2 L
2 L
2 W
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 W
2
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 L
1 L
1 L
1
1
1
2
1 L
2 W
2 L
2 W
2
1
1 L
2 L
2 W
1
1 W
2
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
1
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 L
2 L
1 W
1 L
1 L
2
2 W
1
2 L
1 W
1 L
1 L
1
1
1
2
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 W
1
1
1
2
1 W
1 L
2 L
1 W
1 L
1 L
2
1 W
1 L
1 W
1
2
2 L
2 W
1
2 W
1 W
2 W
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego


Now i will show you have dozen dominate and why this march most of times succés.
You will see for example dozen 1&2 strike for 789 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 times in a row or it could be dozen 2&3

I illustrate this as follows:

1. Singles is dozen 1
2. Series of two is dozen 2
3. Series of Three and higher is dozen 3

1
1
1 dozen 3
2
1 dozen 1
2 dozen 1
1 dozen 1
2 dozen 1 - strike 5 times
2 dozen 2
1
1 dozen 2
2
1 dozen 1 - strike 7 times
1
1 dozen 3
2
1 dozen 1
1
1 dozen 3
2
1 dozen 1
1
1 dozen 3
1
1
1
2
1 dozen 1
2 dozen 1 - strike 8 times
2 dozen 2
1
1 dozen 2 - strike 4 times
2
2
2 dozen 3
2
2
2
1
1 dozen 2
2
2 dozen 2
1
1 dozen 2
2
2 dozen 2
1
1
1 dozen 3 - strike 8 times
1
2
1 dozen 1
1 dozen 2
2
1 dozen 1 - strike 3 times
1
1 dozen 3
1
2
1 dozen 1
2 dozen 1 - strike 4 times
2 dozen 2
1
1 dozen 2
2
1 dozen 1
2 dozen 1
1 dozen 1
2
2 dozen 2
1
2 dozen 1
1 dozen 1
1 dozen 2
2
1 dozen 1
2 dozen 1 - strike 13 times
2
2 dozen 3
1
1
1 dozen 3
2
2
2 dozen 3
1
2 dozen 1 - strike 6 times
2 dozen 2
1
2 dozen 1
1 dozen 1
1 dozen 2
2
2 dozen 2 - strike 6 times
1
1
1 dozen 3
1
2
2 dozen 3
2
2
1
1 dozen 2
2
2 dozen 2
1
1 dozen 2
2
2
2 dozen 3
1
1 dozen 2 - strike 9 times
2
1 dozen 1 - strike 2 times
1
1 dozen 3
2
2
2 dozen 3
2
1
2 dozen 1
1 dozen 1
2 dozen 1 - strike 6 times
2
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego


I challange any one to try to come up with a march that win more then my solution - it is Amazing how effective it is.
Here is two solutions following the random path with 1 in 3 probability.

The first march:
You see dozen 1 you play dozen 1.
You have dozen 1 and 2 you play dozen 1 and 2.
You allways follow the last hitting dozen and play against dozen to alternate 123.

Secound march:
Lets say you see dozen 1 then you play dozen 2 and 3
Lets say you see dozen 2 then you play dozen 1 and 3
Lets say you see dozen 3 then you play dozen 1 and 2
Until two two loses, then you wait for a fictive win and start over.

I test the second march flat betting:

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

 With the first march i have used 111 - 122 - 136 and so on to deal with variance and fluctation.
That is with the first march.

With the second march i have used 11 - 12 - 23 and so on to deal with variance and fluctation.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego


This is how second march look like flat betting ....

link:s://youtu.be/oCigi8kh7H8
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

NextYear

Processing, processing...
Thank you Ego, that comes out from long experience!

I'll return with questions after analyze.

RouletteGhost

Ego on 2nd dozen march any progression?
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

harri44

I'm a bit confused. You talk about dozens but the videos show you betting red or black even chances. Maybe I'm being thick lol, but I'm struggling to understand the system.

-