Why do we win, and Why do we lose....

[RouletteGhost]

This why you irrelevant.

Hopefully one day the parasite leaves its host.

[dimsun]

This is just a distraction. It's not useful information. It's like teaching somebody that to play effective tennis you need a racket and a tennis ball. A soccer ball won't do because it can't bounce high enough. OK great - thank you wise one! At least with Priyanka she gave us Cycles and VdW - far more useful tools and far more relevant. Roulette is a technical game, you know? This advice is more about when to step away from a losing game of Patball: as soon as somebody beats you with a lowcut then step away from that game immediately otherwise you will dig yourself a bigger hole that you can't get out of.

Need learn not lose before learn win. How many time you winning then end loser?

Like said can lead horse water not make drink.

[falkor2k15]

Need learn not lose before learn win. How many time you winning then end loser?

Like said can lead horse water not make drink.

It has a lot to do with the payout odds vs. probability of winning I reckon. If we bet sleepers over repeaters then we lose more because we are choosing events that pay worse over time. Winning/Losing streaks are a product of that: more losing streaks because our events have a negative edge associated with them. Hence we lose more and we have longer losing streaks. Our decisions cannot help us other than to look at a framework like cycles for limiting combinations and knowing when to enter/exit a game based on the flow of repeats.

[MrJ]

Duh!  It's like reading your Pri nonsense.

100% correct General sir.

Falkor said its not useful information but indeed it is. As I have said MANY times, knowing what does not work (or silly reading), how is that not "useful"?

Ken

[falkor2k15]

100% correct General sir.

Falkor said its not useful information but indeed it is. As I have said MANY times, knowing what does not work (or silly reading), how is that not "useful"?

Ken

We don't lose more because we keep playing after the first losing spin. If we have positive edge (predictability wins over payout odds and default bias) then we win more and we win in longer streaks, but since by default we have negative edge from the unfair payouts and house edge then we are guaranteed to lose more and lose in longer streaks regardless of any decisions we make in reaction to a winning/losing situation.

[dimsun]

Hopefully one day the parasite leaves its host.

You right. Sometime parasite useful to host. This time not. Smart host purge. 

Irrelevant best ignored.

[dimsun]

Falkor you play real or simulation always?

[RouletteGhost]

You right. Sometime parasite useful to host. This time not. Smart host purge. 

Irrelevant best ignored.

[MrJ]

Back to...its not "useful information".

So I post a system... bet on the second column with a "soft" (lol) progression after the 13-18 DS hits. Five TOP members (not you guys) chime in and say its a dumb a** system along with graphs showing so.

You happen to love my system, would you say this information is not useful?

Ken

[falkor2k15]

Falkor you play real or simulation always?

It's the same IMO: bias from different dealers average out over time like how random numbers behave from 0 to 36. The Law of the Third and the Law of Large Numbers apply to both real data and a decent RNG like random.org. My simulators use real data anyways.

[dimsun]

Back to...its not "useful information".

So I post a system... bet on the second column with a "soft" (lol) progression after the 13-18 DS hits. Five TOP members (not you guys) chime in and say its a dumb a** system along with graphs showing so.

You happen to love my system, would you say this information is not useful?

Ken

Took long time learn.  System not make loser.

[dimsun]

Falkor you play real or simulation always?

It's the same IMO: bias from different dealers average out over time like how random numbers behave from 0 to 36. The Law of the Third and the Law of Large Numbers apply to both real data and a decent RNG like random.org. My simulators use real data anyways.

Disagree simulation no experience make not real.  Real bring emotion.  That when winner or loser.

[RouletteGhost]

Least turbo was mature and smart enough to leave.

[MrJ]

Looking for an answer to my question.

Ken

[MrJ]

Least turbo was mature and smart enough to leave.

He'll be back. You should kiss the ground he walks on. Why?

Thats simple....he knows more than you and you should LEARN from the people that KNOW MORE THAN YOU instead of fighting them because your ego is over inflated.

Ken