Question for Advantage Players

[Steve]

I see the last number and count back that amount and pick that and the next 2
Lol....its worked a treat

The amount of times I had clear in mind mind where the ball would land, and it actually landed there, is not something I put down to luck. There are some strange things that happen that occur often enough to be significant, and realistically I dont think it's just in my head.

even though I could "caleb" you for years every time you posted about it because it flies in the face of maths and reality.

Go ahead and "caleb" me. I'll "steve" you back.

I believe in precognition because:

1. Personal experience. I've seen enough to see there's something in it.

2. The science IS there. People wouldnt have believed in radio waves before equipment to detect them. Invisible doesn't mean absent. It's a guess how it all works, but I believe because everything is connected, "sensing" what is going to happen can be done kind of like sensing a "wave" in the ocean. Imagine being on a raft. By sensing the ups and downs, you could have a reasonable idea of the next wave. Maybe that's a bad example but in a precognition situation, our physical bodies are a manifestation of energy - more like an effect. But anyway to make it simple, there has been enough testing to realistically conclude precignition is feasible.

Consider the following:

a. The study at link:://dbem.ws/FeelingFuture.pdf -  There are actually many like it.

b. See link:://global-mind.org - this measures the correlation between global events like terror attacks, and the effect on RNG data.

c. Controlled study on precognition in gambling - I have a report on this but I'd need to scan and publish it. I cant find an online copy. It explains a method where as group of participants predicted casino game outcomes, but the simulated bet was placed only on numbers that had the "majority vote". So there may be 10 participants which each have only marginally better than random accuracy, which is not statistically relevant. But when the majority of participants predicted the same number, that one is bet on with much higher accuracy and statistical significance.

d. I did a similar test with the "majority vote" method with positive results. I mailed my database to get participants, and published on the forums. But I need to do more tests to see what we find. I intend to use the multiplayer game.

There is real science about it. And a lot more of it, so i'm not high or deluded. It shouldnt seem so impossible. There is plenty to suggest it's more than possible. Also consider quantum physics and research how observing an experiment actually changes the outcome. See below:

Now, if we can just figure out how to use that "gut feeling" to over come the house edge in roulette

My idea is using equipment to measure physiological responses. Basically like an "8 ball" that tells us "yes or no". Yes i mean "gut feeling". We all have it. I believe it's never wrong, but we need to learn to listen to it. The "8" comes from "infinity" and the toroid shape, the most elemental recursive energy pattern. The human energy center, also center of mass. The physical and energetic variations of ourselves reflect each other.

The theory is our subconscious is more aware of things than our conscious mind knows. Our conscious mind actually just gets in the way. ie the more "thought" you have, the less accuracy you have. But with a device to measure physiological responses like a lie detector works, you can probably get higher accuracy with "yes or no" questions. Like for example, if you bet on red and there is a specific response measured, that could mean you need to move your bet.

Whenever you take an action, you will either feel right or uneasy about your decision. That's the subtle feeling we all get. And that's the gut feeling I think is the key. Of course if you trust yourself and your gut, then you dont need a machine to assist.

Watch bashar on youtube Im not saying he is who he says he is. He could be crazy. But the message is great Create your own reality Anything you can imagine already exists Remote viewing Shift to a reality where your number hits Its crazy talk. But......

I dont think Bashar channels an alien. I think he gets into a meditative state to try and increase consciousness, which means universal knowledge, and he uses the persona of the alien to make things flow better, in his mind. On occasions he has been asked if the alien is real, and he responded its not important, but what is important is if the knowledge works for you.

Personally I think some of what he preaches, while "channeling", is dangerous to minds. for example:

* when he says "switch to another reality", switching to another reality will not make you win the lottery. And when he was asked about the NWO, he said "switch to another reality". Actually switching reality in your own head wont solve the problem. All it will do is change your perception, and this will change your actions, and lead to the solution. So he makes it sound like switching realities is something that's instant and without the need for action.

This reality that we are in is largely influenced by what we "believe". ie if you believe you are dumb, you will behave dumb. In that sense, you make your own reality. It doesnt mean if you believe you are smart that you will automatically be smart. But it would mean you are more likely to fulfill higher potential. If this is what bashar means, then he would be right. Its the exact same principle of "The Secret" (the book etc). We make our own reality. This is true. But it isnt instant. It's the belief and thought that leads to actions that make it reality, rather than just thought.

Having said that, just "willing" the ball to land on your bet wont work, unless telekinesis was used. From what I've seen of that, it is possible but extremely rare. There have been a few credible cases, and many cheats. This also shouldnt be so difficult to believe, because it could and probably be an electrostatic and biological effect. I can bend a water stream with my hand and some science. But to influence a roulette spin outcome, I'm not sure about that. Influencing outcomes is different to predicting them.

PS Turner, regarding my "world views", is it so hard to believe a group of super wealthy people:

a. work together to maintain their wealth and control
b. dont give a crap about us

Actually I'd consider it inevitable. And its what has happened historically since the beginning of history. It will keep happening in a big cycle.

[Scarface]

I read a study awhile back where the participants were "wired" up to tract their neurological state while they were shown photos.  Some of the photos were very grotesque or sexually, while alot of them were just normal pictures.  Anyway, their brains were showing a response to these picures even before it was shown.  I'm a little to lazy right now to find the study, but it was pretty interesting.  Basically, if this were true our unconscious mind can pick up things before it happens.  Guess it just depends on how in tune someone is with this info.

[Steve]

Scarface, yes that's exactly what I'm talking about. Carefully read the material I referenced.

[Turner]

Thanks Steve
So numerology ideas which dont challange the inbuilt maths models in roulette should be considered if precognition can?

But Turner....random numbers carry no information

Ok...then what information is precognition previewing if there isnt any there.

[Steve]

RNG is still cause and effect.  It's not random.  Nothing is. It's just that models used by players agent changing the odds.

I don't see much merit in todays numerology.

I explained my theory about precog in earlier post.