Coldstepper

[ignatus]

This is 2-12 numbers bet, in a progressive bet. Had some luck so far, but i can't say anything definite just yet, we all know how it use to be: first im lucky, then the luck turns,... anyway :S

Procedure: First number that hit, that is your playground (High or Low) place a bet on the unhit number on the split hit, also +1u bet on the opposite H/L. Now for each hit,(in the same H/L) one number is placed on the unhit number within the split hit, also for each bet +1u bet on the opposite H/L, continue betting this way until (6) numbers are bet, when 6 numbers are bet +1u bet and start a 12 numbers negative progression from there (where you are in the progressionline) IF zero or a the unbet number hit within the split (before 6 numbers are bet) +1u bet

Progression: doz negative (after 6 numbers bet, within that same H/L)
2 3 4 6 9 14 21 31 47 70 105 158 237 355 533

(It's hard to explain this one, sry for my bad english, i'll make a video for demonstration)

played with 1u bets (stoploss -200u, wingoal +200u)

5/5 Games won

[ignatus]

Yes, i could predict my own doom, had three losses within the next 5 games.

Never mind

[celescliff]

Dont take this the wrong way but with your creativity,  fiddle ONLY with flat or positive progression and throw the negative progression in the dumpster once and for all.

[The General]

Ignatus,



You really should consider testing your systems over a more statistically relevant number of spins.  You'll learn more.  Doing so will enable you break away from the fallacies, and will help you build more reasonable methods. Right now you're just wasting your time by testing on so few spins, and your graphs show nothing of value.   

Just my ten cents.  Best of luck,

-The General

[RouletteGhost]

Ignatus, take the above with a grain of salt.

"Wasting your time" as he puts it, is relative to the individual

If you enjoy it, then it is not a waste of your time

Obviously you enjoy it, because it is what you do everyday

It is admirable

[The General]

My point is this:


You're not going to learn anything by testing for just a few hundred or a thousand spins.

However, if you test your systems for 20k, 50k, and 100k spins at a time, then your graphs and systems will show results that have more value.  You'll also learn more from your results. Think bigger.

[sturrock]

Re Testing spins:- This is just my idea? If you test a system for 500, 5000,50000,or 50000000000 spins I think this is the wrong way to do it. You will never sit at a table that long. Take your 5000 spins or what ever you have,Then  take the first say 60 spins, test them move up say 120 spins and say test the next 50 spins move up maybe 700 spins and test lets say 30 spins from that 5000 etc etc Would this be a better and more accurate way to test.
Just a thought........................

[RouletteGhost]

Caleb is stuck in the fallacy that is playing one million spins. Impossible.

[sturrock]

Plus if you run 5000 spins then another 5000 you will get totally diffrent results. If you got the same results you would crack Roulette. So I think every day, every spin is diffrent.......... Just my thoughts...........

[The General]

If you test a system for 500, 5000,50000,or 50000000000 spins I think this is the wrong way to do it. You will never sit at a table that long.-Sturrock

Obviously you won't play 5k spins in one setting, but you will likely play far more than that over a period of time.  Every short session is part of a longer term.

I highly recommend that you read more on statistical relevance.