Just for Mogul397

[mogul397]

Notto, is there any success in all this?

OR just demonstrating how it will fail?

If you're betting numbers 1-9, that is close to a dozen bet.

[nottophammer]

Notto, is there any success in all this? probably not

OR just demonstrating how it will fail? Yes, but if you observe the spins, you can see if you wait you can get the win.

If you're betting numbers 1-9, that is close to a dozen bet. you are correct, but this is just watching single #'s

You know a dozen repeats, your quote 24, so if the marquee is just double digits,is it not worth tracking to see if you can start to bet for the win, with a single 1-9, what if the marquee is as above but showing 1st dozen is missing , then is it not better to play the 12?

What does old top dog say marquee shows 15 previous spins so your 24 is not far away

[mogul397]

You know a dozen repeats, your quote 24, so if the marquee is just double digits,is it not worth tracking to see if you can start to bet for the win, with a single 1-9, what if the marquee is as above but showing 1st dozen is missing , then is it not better to play the 12?

What does old top dog say marquee shows 15 previous spins so your 24 is not far away

That's something you could do, but I don't see any magic in the 1-9. Just circumstantial.
1st dozen. And you'd still have to chase a progression.

[nottophammer]

That's something you could do, but I don't see any magic in the 1-9. Just circumstantial. Does GUT and KTF fall into this?
1st dozen. And you'd still have to chase a progression.

[mogul397]

The way you portray it, you make it sound like you found something good in
single numbers.  Your conclusion seems to revolve around the fallacy that it is
VERY GOOD if you bet once and win. Which doesn't happen.

It is still best 2-1 payoff that you have to chase through a bunch of losing bets.
Not the HG where you are nailing every one.