The Ultimate Bet

[ignatus]

I haven't forgot the wisdom of the past, testing and testing in RX, to find the ultimate betselection doing hundreds and thousands of spins, the less numbers bet, the better, (in the long run)...And my conclution and final statement IS 2 number bet is the final and ultimate betselection. Anyone who has done their work in RX should know this, i don't think it's a big "secret" it's more of a fact.
Ken knew this, i don't know how he found out, without testing is RX or any other computer simulation. I'm sure most of the more experienced members also know this, but they don't talk about it?...

Procedure: Bet a 2 numbers sector on the wheel. (I played, from these tests with sector 0-32)

Progression: Positive. For each hit, +1u bet for the next 18 spins. IF no hit within these 18 spins, go back betting 1u.

Bank/stoploss: 200u playing with 1u bets, 1000u playing with 5u bets (and so on...)

First tests was played with 5u bets, (wingoal  +500u, stoploss -1000u)

9/10 Games won

[Rewster88]

Ignatus,

Maybe you should work on you MM. Create a wingoal higher then the stoploss( or same) , if you then have a winrate of more then 70% you absolute have a winner.

Anyway, great system and much respect for your system creating

and remember:


Nelson Mandela: '' A winner is a dreamer who never gives up"


R

[ignatus]

Maybe you should work on you MM.

Thanks

Yes, it depends on the risk you want to take. Ken mentioned his secret betting method once, (i think by accident) (that i never forget) HE said, something like, "I wait for 1 big win, then i QUIT"; That is, he played with higher chips and could take a nice profit from 1 win. I demonstrated this betting method with "Hotzone" and it was very successfull...

[Priyanka]

I wait for 1 big win, then i QUIT"; That is, he played with higher chips and could take a nice profit from 1 win.

Very very wrong advice to stick to

[ignatus]

Very very wrong advice to stick to

Why? then you haven't seen my result playing this method with "Hotzone".

It all depends on what stoploss you have, that is always the risk. But if you're winning more than you losing, that's the point, and that was the result of Ken's betting-method....

[Priyanka]

But if you're winning more than you losing, that's the point, and that was the result of Ken's betting-metho

Ok.  Cool.

[ignatus]

There is always room for tweaks This was played with 3 numbers bet. Sector 26-0-32. In my opinion 3 numbers is a better choise, (i had better results with 3 numbers bet, than 2 numbers) because of less variance (drawdowns) and less waiting time before hit. Short term i think 3 numbers are better. Furthermore i've come to the conclution that the best wingoal for this one IS +50u, and stoploss -100u (playing with 1u bets),

8/10 Games won

[ignatus]

15/20 Games won That's a ~75% winrate, so far (playing with 3 numbers- sector 26,0,32 bet)

[ignatus]

This last session was very bad, but obviously Flatbetting (positive progression) a static bet can't be expected to have good result. This was *FOR DEMONSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY* you must find your own system/betselection; hotnumbers, repeaters, triggers or what else you like playing. My point was to prove that flatbetting 3 numbers, shows a POSITIVE result

Final stats

20/30 Games won.

[Bettingking]

Well at least overall you would have broken even after 30 games  and the more important aspect is wiser than before