Sequential Roulette

[jon86]

It's easy to beat 10,000 spins if you only attack 10 times.

No. You mean how many bets placed? Many:)

Jon

[Ucerb]

Hi,
I am new here. I am gripped by this system of sequential roulette which I have been studying for a month or so. I am wondering how everyone's tests on it are going since the last post here? What I have found is: never gone beyond 36 spins for numbers 8 9 11 12, 26 27 29 30 but has gone up to 44 or 48 spins taking any other 2 corner bets. I am thinking possibly it's something to do with if you fold the board together certain numbers will map onto each other like 8 9 11 12 falls onto 26 27 29 30. Another example: 1 2 4 5 falls onto 31 32 34 35 and it could be these are the best ones to go for.

[Rewster88]

what happens with this one? I saw it on the other forum the guy is swearing that he still didn't lost with the ballvinder double corner bets in 3 years.
Some say the system sucks but no one ever proved that it will lose.

grtz R

[RouletteGhost]

Rewster see my thread from several days ago. A member said it faiks

[RouletteGhost]

Normy made a bot says no good

I wish it worked

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15123.0

[Normy2000]

I cant find the set of spins that made it lose cause it was 2 years ago,
but see a 24h test at Dublin, see how long waiting for a trigger can be.

Remember, those +78 units won in 24h are dimes so you would win a BIG 7.8 dollard for your day.

IMO, you better wash the floor at McDonnald, no?

[Normy2000]

Try your-self, Rx attached. :-)

[RouletteGhost]

So in other words it is a good system if used with big boy units

[Normy2000]

Not even. I see some 5-6 hours waiting for trigger.
I also reached step 27 (220 x 2) in a 5k spins set.

The system is not for human, and a bot would need all the small profit to put dummy bets on the table to keep the conection with the casino busy...