• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

*THE MATRIX SLIDE*

Started by Johnlegend, Jul 21, 04:59 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

superman

QuoteThe guy who lost his very first game on CODE 4 Robeenhutt. Then went on to win over 200 games last count

That's lucky!

QuoteBut I must be lying again

I don't think you lie, but it's not the inflated/fluffed up/over exagerated/hyped up grail claims of the method/s that is winning, it's TIMING which equates to luck, as Ophis said yesterday, if your TIMING is good you can just play red/black for 2 attacks and run.

So either we ALL get to grips with TIMING or we lose with bad TIMING.
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

Bayes

John needs to clarify what he means by TIMING. If timing is random, it can mean nothing more than luck.
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Bayes

Quote from: amk on Aug 07, 08:02 PM 2011
Bayes..........

Surely a great mind such as yours realizes when there is merit to a method.........
Can't work out whether you're being sarcastic...  ???

Anyway, I need your input in this thread. Cheers.  :thumbsup:
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Johnlegend

Quote from: Bayes on Aug 08, 05:07 AM 2011
John needs to clarify what he means by TIMING. If timing is random, it can mean nothing more than luck.
The whole concept of HIT AND RUN is about timing. Unlike Supermans tangent of thought. Its not timing made by you. Its simply the fact you are landing between losing games more than on them.

By executing short bursts of play. And the bigger the paper odds the bigger the potential.

So when I say timing its not a decision made by you. Its the positive by product of you as a player, having the patience to WAIT for your profit.

I can't even begin to tell you how wrong both you and Superman are about there being no difference between playing the layout straight or a smart matrix method. Do you honestly think for example  the player playing against four consecutive dozens forming after there have been two in a row.

Is the equivalent of someone playing CODE 4?

I have seen players lose THREE TIMES IN A ROW. Playing against the layout in this fashion. Why do you think I would go to all this effort. If it were that easy to tame random.

Atlantis's brilliant idea to bet against a reverse slide. Is looking like the best investment you will ever make for 26 units. The strikerate will be 150/1 minumum by the look of it.

You learn what works and what doesn't. Pattern Breaker is the best method. I have yet seen for a mere 7 unit buy in. If someone brings a better method for that investment. I will be there.

CODE 4 is continuing to deliver the wins consistently. As is THE MATRIX SLIDE. Still my fourth step is unchallenged. And as for the REVERSE SLIDE. I will hype something when it is that good.

So the bottom line don't get all jittery and worried because your precious maths theories look to be as flawed as I've perceived for some time now. The crux of the matter is random struggles with the MATRIX. The reverse slide is seriously pushing it to the limit. It will never show negative figures played in short bursts.

My experience tells me this already...

Johnlegend

RESULTS UPDATE FOR THE MATRIX SLIDE FOR 11/08/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 210

TOTAL GAMES WON 210

TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 420 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 117

STEP 2 WINS 64

STEP 3 WINS 28

STEP 4 WINS 1

Performing VERY consistently its taken 204 games to push me to the fourth step. And I am approaching 3 completed progressions in winnings.

viclimks

Quote from: Johnlegend on Aug 11, 06:02 PM 2011
RESULTS UPDATE FOR THE MATRIX SLIDE FOR 11/08/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 210

TOTAL GAMES WON 210

TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 420 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 117

STEP 2 WINS 64

STEP 3 WINS 28

STEP 4 WINS 1

Performing VERY consistently its taken 204 games to push me to the fourth step. And I am approaching 3 completed progressions in winnings.
Dear JL,are u playing hit n run on this system,how many sessions do u play?is it the same for 5 sessions a day?

Johnlegend

Quote from: viclimks on Aug 11, 09:48 PM 2011
Dear JL,are u playing hit n run on this system,how many sessions do u play?is it the same for 5 sessions a day?
Always Hit and Run Viclimks. A good method becomes a great method when you apply short bursts of play. Random is chasing its tail. I am testing three methods at the same time currently. THE MATRIX SLIDE,THE REVERSE SLIDE and Kattilas outstanding PYRAMID MATRIX. And I am very impressed with the REVERSE SLIDE. And PYRAMID MATRIX. Applied hit and run. You will always beat this game. They present too much for random to deal with. Way too much.

chewmchew

Slingshot roulette.... the manufacturer states that wheel speed can be changed after "no more bets" announcement...and some one says that there is a random jet of air may blow the ball from its target slot...   Then how can any one predict the winning slot ?   any answers ?
:twisted:

Johnlegend

Quote from: chewmchew on Jun 26, 07:54 AM 2012
Slingshot roulette.... the manufacturer states that wheel speed can be changed after "no more bets" announcement...and some one says that there is a random jet of air may blow the ball from its target slot...   Then how can any one predict the winning slot ?   any answers ?
:twisted:
You cant, forget this VB nonsense. Its for dreamers. Play a good method with tight money management. And solid self discipline and you can beat this game longterm. All the rest is fools gold.

RouletteGhost

WELL WELL WELL

where have i seen THIS before

the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Reyth

I find myself on both sides of this debate.

1) I find this Matrix Slide system intriguing

I actually programmed a scanner for it so all I have to do is enter the spin results and it will tell me when to bet.  So far I am at 100% win rate.

2) The real way to prove the validity of this system is to test it vs. random.

Even though I am intrigued by this system, I suspect it won't differ from random and win streaks are based on the .65 win chance per bet.

I will try to logically analyze the system by how I know roulette works:

The driving force behind roulette is numbered slots and the force of equal distribution; all color, column, dozen odd/even results are driven by the force of the numbered slots only.  This system analyzes the order of spin results going back 7 spins of history (from the bottom to top corner is 7 spins).  In order for the system to work, the last 7 spin results must relate to the expected spin result when not configured into a matrix grid (that alone is highly questionable) but even more incredibly, the results must be related when inside this arbitrary grid.  The grid pattern is another way of saying Spin #1, 7 spins ago, Spin #2, 3 spins ago &  Spin #3, the last spin of analysis which occurred 3 spins from the spin that is about to take place -- if all of these spins are the same then the expected result will not be the same but if it is not twice or at least not thrice or at least extremely rarely not four times.  My experience with the force of equal distribution has a spin range between 20 to around 200 spins or so.  There just isn't enough force behind 3 spins to properly conclude anything even if they are analyzed out of order (in this case, its every third spin).  In my informed estimation, the only way to properly analyze potential column results would need to revolve around the equal distribution of the numbered slots contained in the columns this concept simply cannot relate in a consistent systematic way to analyzing the history 2 spins back of every 3rd spin -- the data sample is just woefully incomplete and it might as well be a shot in the dark.  The force of equal distribution simply doesn't care about every 3rd spin back 3 spins and there are 12 slots in a column anyway.

Regardless of how much this system intrigues me, it simply is nothing more than a systematic superstition. 

TwoCatSam

I love the phrase "force of equal distribution".

Perhaps we should listen to this person.

Unless he goes away....
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

thelaw

Quote from: TwoCatSam on May 08, 11:58 AM 2015
I love the phrase "force of equal distribution".

Perhaps we should listen to this person.

Unless he goes away....

.....be careful. Although Reyth is a very detailed and seemingly honest poster, he just finished 5 pages @ Roulette30 forum with pretty bad results on the Kavouras Bet. Nothing against Reyth, but he had extremely high expectations that were shattered very quickly. I'm always a bit wary of those who think they have found the answer right out of the gate.
You sir.......are a monster!!!

TwoCatSam

Thank you, Mr. Law, but are we sure he's right out of the gate.  He may be in the stretch.
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

thelaw

Quote from: TwoCatSam on May 08, 03:18 PM 2015
Thank you, Mr. Law, but are we sure he's right out of the gate.  He may be in the stretch.

Nope-he says it himself in his first posts on Roulette30; he's a newbie.

.......but like I said, he is very meticulous, so although he's going to have his heart broken many times on these boards, he may eventually find something useful.

I'm guessing that his next phase is going through all of the old systems; let's just hope he doesn't find a new guru named "John Legend"! :)
You sir.......are a monster!!!

-