*THE MATRIX SLIDE*

amk · Jul 25, 12:08 PM 2011

"I have lost CODE 4 YET, imagine CODE 5 HIT AND RUN."

Just saw a little typo.... "I have not lost CODE 4 YET"

I see how you are testing JohnLegend, 1 line versus 1 line back to back......

I know I am going off on a tangent again but just wanted to see what the possibilities are....

MATRIX VERTICAL 5 played CODE 5 format...

11 6 pointers or + in 7000 spins If you wait for a repeat and play a 4 stage progression 1400 games would have been played with 11 loses +600 units.... I did test on random.org just to illustrate the potential on LIVE WHEEL.....

Sorry for the tangent..........

Johnlegend · Jul 25, 03:29 PM 2011

Quote from: wolfat on Jul 25, 11:29 AM 2011
Hi JohnL.,
just for clarifying:
130 games played, how can you get +164? you should win at leats 1 unit per game...
I'm missing something?
tx
andrea

Hello Andrea and welcome, I use THREE BETTING LEVELS AS FOLLOWS.

1,1-3,3--LEVEL 1

3,3-9,9--LEVEL 2

12,12-36,36--LEVEL 3

After a losing game I will raise to LEVEL 2 for two games. After a DOUBLE LOSS I will raise to LEVEL 3 for two games. I also play my first game of the day at LEVEL 2. This is why my winning balance supercedes the number of ganes won and lost.

I am currently toying with the idea of a four step progression all in. As three consecutive complete slides seems to be randoms limit. Sufficiently enough to turn a handsome profit...

Johnlegend · Jul 25, 03:38 PM 2011

Quote from: amk on Jul 25, 12:08 PM 2011
"I have lost CODE 4 YET, imagine CODE 5 HIT AND RUN."

Just saw a little typo.... "I have not lost CODE 4 YET"

I see how you are testing JohnLegend, 1 line versus 1 line back to back......

I know I am going off on a tangent again but just wanted to see what the possibilities are....

MATRIX VERTICAL 5 played CODE 5 format...

11 6 pointers or + in 7000 spins If you wait for a repeat and play a 4 stage progression 1400 games would have been played with 11 loses +600 units.... I did test on random.org just to illustrate the potential on LIVE WHEEL.....

Sorry for the tangent..........

Its all good AMK, I don't know if you remember SCOOBIES TWO OF A KIND? Well I've been testing it using COLUMNS. And it works better than dozens. With a fast turnover. So there space for it all.

CODE 4 STILL hasn't LOST, I'm speechless. Never thought I would see the day a method would go well beyond 500 games without loss. I think the MATRIX SLIDE is going to produce similar results when I start playing it with 4 steps....

amk · Jul 26, 05:00 PM 2011

How did you change that typo JohnLegend?

donik7777 · Jul 26, 06:23 PM 2011

Hi AMK!
You won 875, how many win on 1 steps and 2 steps?

amk · Jul 26, 06:56 PM 2011

Hello donik7777,

I did not take note of progression steps........

I felt that only a loss was relevant........

amk · Jul 26, 07:01 PM 2011

MATRIX SLIDE played with a four step progression or a loss as a trigger would be very strong........

Johnlegend · Jul 27, 09:16 AM 2011

Quote from: amk on Jul 26, 07:01 PM 2011
MATRIX SLIDE played with a four step progression or a loss as a trigger would be very strong........

I agree Amk, I haven't seen more than three consecutive slides. For newbies a one slide trigger and three step progression would be the ticket.

Played for two game sessions as I'm doing I expect at least 200/1 The only thing is, because its a pure random method like PATTERN BREAKER. It cannot be rushed, you have to wait for random to deliver your bet.

This is why I hail CODE 4 the greatest mechanical method I've ever seen. It performs brilliantly for a set method...

qwerty · Jul 29, 11:02 AM 2011

THATS BECAUSE IT IS FUCKING FIXED, AND SO'S THE SLINGSHOT THEY GOT ON THERE, YOU CANT BEAT ROULETTE ANYWAY BUT THEY STILL FIX IT AS WELL TO FUCK UP YOUR LUCK, IT STOPS HIT AND RUN TACTICS YOU SEE!

Johnlegend · Jul 31, 07:08 AM 2011

For the last week I have converted to playing THE MATRIX SLIDE with a FOUR STEP PROGRESSION for 5 x 2 a day. With 80 units Im seeing a potentially astronomical strikerate. Even with CODE 4 we know it can lose your 80 unit progression. I think catching a loss on the slide with a four step will be near impossible.

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 80

TOTAL GAMES WON 80

TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 160 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 48
STEP 2 WINS 26
STEP 3 WINS 6
STEP 4 CURRENTLY UNCHALLENGED...

keel44 · Jul 31, 11:34 PM 2011

I have read a lot of pages about the matrix systems. Can you tell me why you guys are going crazy over this technique? Why does writing the results in a different way going to produce a better strike rate? I really would like to know the theory behind this? I am puzzled. Why not just bet anything into a martingale?

Johnlegend · Aug 01, 04:45 AM 2011

Quote from: keel44 on Jul 31, 11:34 PM 2011
I have read a lot of pages about the matrix systems. Can you tell me why you guys are going crazy over this technique? Why does writing the results in a different way going to produce a better strike rate? I really would like to know the theory behind this? I am puzzled. Why not just bet anything into a martingale?

Keel let me give you the advantage. Lets say like nearly everyone who plays roulette you play straight off the layout.

So for example you may wait for three reds then using a martingale progression bet there won't be say 8 reds. Yes you will win. But you will ALWAYS be at the mercy of randoms ebb and flow.

At anytime random may decide it wants to show you 10,12,14 or more reds. The other day people were crying foul play at betfreds because the croupier spun off 18 evens.

Hurling abuse, these morons have no idea what theyre up against. NOW, putting the results into a matrix MAKES RANDOM WORK MUCH HARDER.

Instead of trying to tame its CONSTANT FLOW. Which you CANNOT. We break up that flow and make it go round in cycles. So instead of producing 17 straight reds or blacks. It has to place the same result in the same place every three or four or five spins. And its not as efficient at doing this.

You also have A VISUAL CHART before you that allows you to study randoms behaviour. AND MUCH MORE IMPORTANTLY. *ITS COMMON LIMITS*. By that I mean points it cannot breech very often. From this functional methods can be forged to take advantage of these common limits.

THE MATRIX SLIDE is looking like the ultimate random tamer right now.

Proofreaders2000 · Aug 01, 08:19 AM 2011

What bankroll would you recommend for a $10 base bet?

Johnlegend · Aug 01, 09:03 AM 2011

Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on Aug 01, 08:19 AM 2011
What bankroll would you recommend for a $10 base bet?

Your BR should be at least 200 X the size of your base bet so for $10 you ideally want $2000

Johnlegend · Aug 01, 09:10 AM 2011

Quote from: qwerty on Jul 29, 11:02 AM 2011
that's BECAUSE IT IS f****** FIXED, AND SO'S THE SLINGSHOT THEY GOT ON THERE, YOU can't BEAT ROULETTE ANYWAY BUT THEY STILL FIX IT AS WELL TO f*** UP YOUR LUCK, IT STOPS HIT AND RUN TACTICS YOU SEE!

That's not going to happen Qwerty. If you have 20 people playing at an online wheel how can they stop them all winning? Give me some example of why you think youre being cheated along with YOUR METHOD. And I will tell you why youre losing.

If you have lost badly in the recent times its simply because you are lacking one or more of the THREE ESSENTIALS of success and nothing else.

Nothing can be missing or you will fail for certain.

News:

*THE MATRIX SLIDE*

THE MATRIX SLIDE