OPPOSITE

[Johnlegend]

                                                                    OPPOSITE

Opposite is a very quick method to play.

It should only be played two or three times back to back once or twice daily............   

Tests on random.org shows it strength. 625 games played 1 loss.

We are using a four stage progression totaling 80 units   1/1  3/3  9/9  27/27



Step 1:   

spin 4 times and record the results for dozens or columns.....

3213 

now we are going to bet against it's opposite landing which is 3123

spin 5:

3213    3 ......  loss on prog 1

spin 6:

3213    31 ...... loss on prog 2

spin 7:

3213    313 ........ win on prog 3


We will be playing two or three back to back games. The next step is the most important and KEY ingredient to achieving the results I had in my test on random.org...........

Step 2:

Virtual spin until we have 4 spin results for the pattern we were betting against.....

3213    3132     in this case two landed.....

Now we spin 4 times again to get or next pattern. Once we have our pattern we bet against it's opposite landing directly within the next four spins............

3213    3132
1131    .......        we have the next pattern and will now bet against its OPPOSITE........

Well done AMK for getting this one off the ground. If this works as good as it looks we have another gem in the arsenal.

[Johnlegend]

Hi AMK, I've started testing/playing your latest gem OPPOSITE. 40 wins out of 40 games so far. I will give a proper update once I have 300 played games. AS that is my personal minumum proofing limit for a method. Well done, it looks like we have another great one on our hands. We are spoilt on this forum we really are. The question is, will the majority of members/browsers EVER REALIZE THIS. ??

[atlantis]

Hi AMK and JL,
Another good idea -  looks very interesting.
A.

[donik7777]

Hello everyone!
Somebody found a system that gives frequent loss?
If yes he will be millioner!

[darrnyf]

 

Hello everyone!
Somebody found a system that gives frequent loss?
If yes he will be millioner!

[donik7777]

We will need to play a completely reverse

[Johnlegend]

when I see this -----> progression  1/1  then 3/3   9/9 27/27   It is killing me. LoL
You can t bet so many chips just to make +1

Why not Roulette explorer. Forget the outlay for a moment. Think of the potential profit margin. If it comes to pass that this method only loses once every 500--1000 games played. Will you be griping about risking 80 units? I think not.

One criticism I have for newbies, and I was once this way myself. Is you expect a lot for a LITTLE. That is why we have casual method hoppers littering every forum on the game. You lack the staying power to truly discover a methods true value or lack of PROPERLY.

This casual attitude does you no favours. And means you will never really get anywhere with the game. You have to stick to something long enough to gain both confidence and longterm profit. Now you have several roulette killers sitting on this forum. The weak link remains your lack of staying power and patience. Sort those out and you will seriously start moving forward.

[Bayes]

RouletteExplorer is no newbie. 

[Nasio]

                                                                   
It should only be played two or three times back to back once or twice daily............   

I take it the system loses if you play it continuously so taking a break between sessions is a waste of time. It's just delaying the inevitable. Sorry to sound negative but I've devised gambling systems over the years and I've also been guilty of similar tactics in my early days and this isn't a good approach to adopt.

[Johnlegend]

RESULTS UPDATE FOR OPPOSITE FOR 19/9/11

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 300

TOTAL GAMES WON 299

TOTAL GAMES LOST 1

STRIKERATE 299/1         

BALANCE 440 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 123

STEP 2 WINS 102

STEP 3 WINS 64

STEP 4 WINS 10---LOSSES 1

This result is better than it looks, and I must congratulate AMK for another superb method to rival possibly surpass CODE 4.

I'm impressed for two reasons. A, these 300 games were played in ten continuos sessions of 30 games. All played ON DOZENS ONLY.B, When the loss came in game 193 it was from a type of pattern I think should void a bet.

3223--This type of pattern offers no advantage just as 2222 doesn't. Played straight or opposite the outcome is the same. Therefore AMK, I personaly will skip a potential game with such a mirror pattern. So overall I'm very impressed with my first 300 results. I'm playing this for 30 games a session once a day. CODE 4 cannot match this type of strikerate played in a similar fashion.

Next update at 600 games played...

[amk]

My fault JohnLegend..................

I saw this sometime ago but did not mention it............

Sorry for that.....

Your testing does show the strength of the method.............

Play on.............

[amk]

Infact, the only recorded loss I had during testing was due to this combination..........

[warrior]

RESULTS UPDATE FOR OPPOSITE FOR 19/9/11

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 300

TOTAL GAMES WON 299

TOTAL GAMES LOST 1

STRIKERATE 299/1         

BALANCE 440 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 123

STEP 2 WINS 102

STEP 3 WINS 64

STEP 4 WINS 10---LOSSES 1

This result is better than it looks, and I must congratulate AMK for another superb method to rival possibly surpass CODE 4.

I'm impressed for two reasons. A, these 300 games were played in ten continuos sessions of 30 games. All played ON DOZENS ONLY.B, When the loss came in game 193 it was from a type of pattern I think should void a bet.

3223--This type of pattern offers no advantage just as 2222 doesn't. Played straight or opposite the outcome is the same. Therefore AMK, I personaly will skip a potential game with such a mirror pattern. So overall I'm very impressed with my first 300 results. I'm playing this for 30 games a session once a day. CODE 4 cannot match this type of strikerate played in a similar fashion.

Next update at 600 games played...

nice one.

[warrior]

I think patterns like 1312  or 1231 where all 3 of the dozens appear might be a good plan i dont know .i got dinged on 2111 got the loss 1112 .

[iggiv]

RESULTS UPDATE FOR OPPOSITE FOR 19/9/11

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 300

TOTAL GAMES WON 299

TOTAL GAMES LOST 1

STRIKERATE 299/1         

BALANCE 440 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 123

STEP 2 WINS 102

STEP 3 WINS 64

STEP 4 WINS 10---LOSSES 1

This result is better than it looks, and I must congratulate AMK for another superb method to rival possibly surpass CODE 4.

I'm impressed for two reasons. A, these 300 games were played in ten continuos sessions of 30 games. All played ON DOZENS ONLY.B, When the loss came in game 193 it was from a type of pattern I think should void a bet.

3223--This type of pattern offers no advantage just as 2222 doesn't. Played straight or opposite the outcome is the same. Therefore AMK, I personaly will skip a potential game with such a mirror pattern. So overall I'm very impressed with my first 300 results. I'm playing this for 30 games a session once a day. CODE 4 cannot match this type of strikerate played in a similar fashion.

Next update at 600 games played...

thanx a lot for your efforts, John