• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

The human skill and observation point with minimum error.

Started by ego, Apr 27, 05:32 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ego


The human skill and observation point with minimum error.

Lets say one parameter is to read release number acc with minimum error.
When ball is over main reference deflector read number below deflector.
And same apply when to estmate rotor among other parameters.

Some one should pick one of the two solution mention and stick to that and get 0.5 pocket error or less.
Some one should aim to spot the red number and if you miss the read, then it will drift next to the black number witch has higher contrast and much more easy to spot.
And aim to read red is due to very high contrast as its between two black numbers.
Also reverse works with the same purpose.
Witch would be aim for black and it might drift towards red witch is between two blacks.





Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

vile

Quote from: ego on Apr 27, 05:32 AM 2012
The human skill and observation point with minimum error.

Lets say one parameter is to read release number acc with minimum error.
When ball is over main reference deflector read number below deflector.and when to read this????
And same apply when to estmate rotor among other parameters.

Some one should pick one of the two solution mention and stick to that and get 0.5 pocket error or less.brilliant..let start winning.
Some one should aim to spot the red number and if you miss the read, then it will drift next to the black number witch has higher contrast and much more easy to spot.Even more brilliant explanation.
And aim to read red is due to very high contrast as its between two black numbers.
Also reverse works with the same purpose.Does it.
Witch would be aim for black and it might drift towards red witch is between two blacks.

Should,let say,aim,if,would be,might........nothing said or explain how it will win.
As usual,confused.

ego


I am sorry about that and i apoliges for this - but you have to be confused  :yawn:

I state it is one basic skill to observe correct witch also is one human skill - that is all.
It is not a system of any kind - just one basic skill or one paramter to master among others when it boils down to visual ballistics  :smile:
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

-