• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

NO LIMIT !!!

Started by D1, May 09, 02:04 PM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

iggiv

Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on May 10, 03:23 PM 2012
I would bet one number and martingale until it won.

that's an example what would happen to many naive people. Most likely u won't have a bank to go on all the time like this. Most likely u will end up losing your bankroll. Then u may think u need a larger bankroll to win because u never so one number to be absent that or this many times.

but to make money u would need to play a lot like this and huge bankrolls. and finally it would  happen, u would lose all your money.

in reality martingaling does not make sense. To have a bankroll of 10 million and make 200 a day with it does not make sense. that's asking for trouble. Such naive players would  be an easy target be it casino personnel or criminals.

GARNabby

It's like "god raising the devil" at a game of poker.  Figure out what infinity is before you go there.

Bayes

Quote from: Skakus on May 10, 02:42 AM 2012
It would be interesting to see just how long it can take for any street to hit back to back.

Maybe someone can do a simple code to follow the last street hit for a back to back repeat. Then run it over a million spins to see what the longest gap is. Then you'd know what to allow for in the progression.

I haven't written a simulation but the maths shows that the probability of a repeat (betting for ANY street to repeat) is the same as that for any preselected street hitting, ie: 3/37. This makes sense, if you assume that no bet selection is better than any other in the long run, because you're just playing "follow the last" on streets.

That means the longest losing run you can expect is around 170 (the record is 178 I believe).
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Skakus

Cool.

I'll Build a no limit progression to go 179 spins.


This reminds me of a system I used to play.

1) Bet FTL street 10 tmes with 1 unit, any win start again from 1).

2) After 10 losses bet FTL 2 streets 2 times with 2 units, any win start again from 1).

3) After 2 losses bet FTL 3 streets 1 time with 3 units, any win start again from 1).

4) After 1 loss bet FTL 4 streets 1 time with 5 units, any win start again from 1).

5) After 1 loss bet FTL 5 streets 1 time with 9 units, any win start again from 1).

6) After 1 loss bet FTL 6 streets 1 time with 22 units, any win start again from 1).

7) After 1 loss bet FTL 7 streets 1 time with 60 units, any win start again from 1).

Any loss here and you're bust. The last stage was a bit of a squeeze and the progression stopped here because that was the house limit for streets at the time. You could probably find bigger house limits these days to stretch the progression further.

8) Ignore the zero's, just keep going and increase the bets/streets when needed.

A bit of fun anyway.
A ship moored in the harbour is safe, but that's not what ships are made for.

Bayes

I think even with no-limit tables it wouldn't be an efficient use of your time. If you had the kind of money that guaranteed wins would demand, you'd probably get a faster rate of return lying on the beach and keeping your bankroll in some kind of investment plan or even a plain 'ol bank with 5% interest.
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Bayes

Just for fun, I worked out how much you'd make in a year, given some reasonably optimistic assumptions.

Assumptions:

1. The roulette table generates 60 spins/hour.
2. The house limit is capped at $2,000,000.
3. You play for 8 hours/day, 5 days/week, for 48 weeks (giving yourself 1 month holiday).

The staking is pure martingale, betting on red.  :)

The house limit only allows 20 double-ups, therefore your bankroll must be $1,048,576

Assuming you win $1 every 2 spins, that's an hourly rate of $30/hour.

So in a year you make 30 x 8 x 5 x 48 = $57,600  :-\

Compare that with 5% interest on your bankroll which is 1,048,576 x 0.05 = $52,429

So for all that work (assuming you don't die of boredom before the end of the year) you make only $5,171 over what you'd make sipping pina coladas on the beach. And remember that 20 of an EC in a row is much less than the record; you're still taking a significant risk.


"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

GARNabby

Quote from: Bayes on May 11, 02:00 AM 2012
... the record is 178 I believe).
Even then, it won't matter.  Can't construct a very-long progression before you're no longer "treading water".  Just because you don't "get caught" doesn't mean you will "stay afloat".
Quote from: Bayes on May 11, 06:01 AM 2012
... or even a plain 'ol bank with 5% interest.
And maybe 10 millions of dollars in the account.  Though they'll charge you that on a simple loan.

-