Row Your Boat system

[StackBundles]

can someone try this with the bet selection as being the time before last so if its
RBR next bet would be B then next bet would be R
i havent got the time at the min else i would. remember using that bet selection the only problems we have is the RRBBRRBBRRBB pattern......... this might give us better results instead of just going for 1 colour

[Maan]

This has nothing to do with Reading random..

/M

[TwoCatSam]

OK,  I can testify......

We used Super Roulette to look for the best of last five and bet it with an up one when you loose and down one when you win.  It was a terrible loser.

Now, this is a new idea--varying the bet in accordance with the flow.

I wish Super Roulette was still around.  This would be fun to test.

Sam

[keel44]

OK,  I can testify......

We used Super Roulette to look for the best of last five and bet it with an up one when you lose and down one when you win.  It was a terrible loser.

Now, this is a new idea--varying the bet in accordance with the flow.

I wish Super Roulette was still around.  This would be fun to test.

Sam

You do mean varying the bet amount?  Using my exact wager amounts---yes?


I know this will not win every session, but maybe more money can be made than not.  This really comes down to losing trends versus winning trends.  Because of the zeros, this is not a 50/50 game.  So there will be a little more losing trends than winning trends, but we will win more on winning trends and lose less on losing trends.

Consider this:

10 losses in a row starting at level 2 for the 1st 3 losses; then 7 more losses at level 1.  That is a grand total of -13 units

8 wins in a row starting at level 2 for the 1st 3 wins; then 5 more wins at level 3.  That is a grand total of +21 units

******actually 9 wins in row is more accurately compared******

Also consider everything else in level 2 betting could be close to a wash.

[TwoCatSam]

Keel

We did not use your system.  The program looked at the last five and bet the leader.  Up one on a loss and down one on a win.  We're playing Bet Voyager so there is no zero.

Had we been playing your system, we would have gone up when the wins started coming instead of going down.

I think your idea has far more merit than the code systems.

WE KNOW ONE THING ABOUT THE ROULETTE WHEEL FOR A FACT:

It always has and always will produce runs and chops of varying lengths.That may be all we know for certain.Sam

[TwoCatSam]

double post


edit:  something is wrong

[malcop]

Hi Keel44,


Love your progression idea it's a sort of positive/negative progression based of your bet selection Win/Loss string.


I played a quick session of Baccarat, using your bet progression and Simple Trend Catcher, only played 39 hands ended the session +8 after hitting +8 for the second time.


One thing at the start of my session I had LWW so I started to play two units as if I had got two out of five wins.


I will try it out when I play some roulette later.


Thanks for sharing 


malcop

[albertojonas]

Hi Keel44,
Love your progression idea it's a sort of positive/negative progression based of your bet selection Win/Loss string.
I played a quick session of Baccarat, using your bet progression and Simple Trend Catcher, only played 39 hands ended the session +8 after hitting +8 for the second time.
One thing at the start of my session I had LWW so I started to play two units as if I had got two out of five wins.
I will try it out when I play some roulette later.
Thanks for sharing 
malcop

HI Malcop,


Nice to see you play baccarat =)


I couldn't resist to play your shoe. See what you can do with this LW registry
[attachimg=1]


Could you apply the progression here?

[malcop]

Hi albertojonas,


I ran though the progression with the win loss string you gave me, it ended +7 with high of +12 twice.


Whats your Bet selection?


Thanks


malcop

[Skakus]

The only thing that will hurt this is when a trend just gets going and then totally stops.  Over and over and over. 

You could get a nasty surprise at just how common that scenario might be.


Nice idea keel44. However, it’s all very well to keep rowing your boat around and around, but sometimes the most fish are caught when you drop anchor!


So perhaps this idea might help:

Start your session with anchors away and play a default 2 unit bet for 5 spins.

Now pull up anchor and row your boat to the end of the last 5 spin Lw registry.

Now drop anchor again and bet for the next 5 spins however many units the last 5 spin Lw registry dictates.

Now pull up anchor and row your boat to the end of the last 5 spin Lw registry.

Now drop anchor again and bet for the next 5 spins however many units the last 5 spin Lw registry dictates.

So on and so forth, each time betting the same progression amount for 5 spins.

This might cause other problems, but at least you won’t miss out on those short lived trends that you have built up using lesser chips only to see them vanish when you put the big chips down.


Give it a test and see what happens.

[Dutchy]

Hi Keel44,
              I like the thinking put behind this one,it's different and if it's a grinder so be it.As long as it improves the bottom like.Good job.

[keel44]

You could get a nasty surprise at just how common that scenario might be.


Nice idea keel44. However, it’s all very well to keep rowing your boat around and around, but sometimes the most fish are caught when you drop anchor!


So perhaps this idea might help:

Start your session with anchors away and play a default 2 unit bet for 5 spins.

Now pull up anchor and row your boat to the end of the last 5 spin Lw registry.

Now drop anchor again and bet for the next 5 spins however many units the last 5 spin Lw registry dictates.

Now pull up anchor and row your boat to the end of the last 5 spin Lw registry.

Now drop anchor again and bet for the next 5 spins however many units the last 5 spin Lw registry dictates.

So on and so forth, each time betting the same progression amount for 5 spins.

This might cause other problems, but at least you won’t miss out on those short lived trends that you have built up using lesser chips only to see them vanish when you put the big chips down.


Give it a test and see what happens.

Already built into my strategy is the proper flow from high to low bet amounts.  Longer trends is what we really need to deal with here.  I am hoping about 90% of the all the bets will be at level 2.  I hope this proves to be sort of a wash.  We should make our money with the longer trends.

I will always fool around with ideas, however.

[Nickmsi]

Hi Keel . . .

Here's a tool that will help you with testing out this idea.  You can quickly check many scenarios.

Simply press F9 to get a new set of 100 spins(RNG) and see the results.

It appears that this would work best with a Stop Loss and Profit Target.  It could also work very well
with a Hit and Run type approach.

Keep the ideas coming . . .

Enjoy

Nick

[TwoCatSam]

Nick

Nice program.  If I could write programs like that, well, I'd write programs like that!!

Sam

[keel44]

Hi Keel . . .

Here's a tool that will help you with testing out this idea.  You can quickly check many scenarios.

Simply press F9 to get a new set of 100 spins(RNG) and see the results.

It appears that this would work best with a stop-loss and Profit Target.  It could also work very well
with a Hit and Run type approach.

Keep the ideas coming . . .

Enjoy

Nick

Thank you sir.  This is why I post on here ----  the blossoming of ideas and tools