***TRILOGY***

[Johnlegend]

I am constantly pushing to try and come up with methods that can outdo the ones I have. I think I may have found two that are very strong. Both work within the CODE 4 matrix. Neither are to be treated as HIT AND RUN. The one I present tonight does require a three step progression. But from what I have seen so far I think its well justified. Welcome to TRILOGY.

THE RULES...

1, You record spins like you would for CODE 4 in a four wide matrix. Example below.

1,C,3,A

2, You now start recording spins under your starting line as you would for a CODE 4 matrix until you have two non matches like the example below.

1,C,3,A
1,B,3,B
2,*-----------This is your trigger for bet 1.

3, Using the classic three step progression 1,1,---3,3,---9,9, we now take our first attempt to complete a trilogy of non matches.

4, You usually win on the first attempt. But if you don't you continue tracking spins until you have your next qualifier and then bet step two of the progression.

5, In 150 recorded fresh games 20 played for real. There has always been at least one trilogy of non matches inside that 20 spin frame. And the 26 unit progression hasn't lost yet. Wading though about 400 CODE 4 games I found two losses.

I  believe that this is stronger than trying to outlive a straight line. Because of how percentage works within that 20 spin frame. A winning streak of 3 plus is always coming but you just don't know where. And often it bleeds onto two lines. That's why this works.

As always questions are welcome.

RESULTS UPDATE FOR 31/05/2012

TOTAL GAMES TESTED/PLAYED 150

TOTAL GAMES WON 150

TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 20 UNITS PLUS.

BREAKDOWN OF WINS.

STEP 1 WINS=78

STEP 2 WINS=46

STEP 3 WINS=26-----LOSSES ZERO.

[jarabo002]

Thanks for your work and especially for having so much imagination Mr. Johnlegend.

I do not understand English very well, so much we appreciate you ilustrate us with a larger example.  

[Johnlegend]

Thanks for your work and especially for having so much imagination Mr. Johnlegend.

I do not understand English very well, so much we appreciate you ilustrate us with a larger example.

Hello and thanks

Below is a complete 20 spin game of TRILOGY

1,C,3,B
3,A,2,A----WON BET ONE DOZEN 2
3,B,3,A
2,B,3,Z
3,B,3,B
3,A,2,C----GAME COMPLETE we record the entire 20 spins for records even if we win/lose earlier in the frame. As you can see there were eventualy two possible wins in that one twenty spin frame. We only chase one win a frame.

[atlantis]

Hi JohnLegend,

Thank you for this latest and new approach. Those results are superb!
Also thanks for example 20 spin game of TRILOGY which makes it quite clear.
After game complete (20 spins) do you begin a new frame straight away or does it not matter?
A.

[amk]

Perhaps 3Peat from the Jordan era is a better title

Many thanks again JohnLegend.

I hope that players which feel that this method is not effective only comment about this a couple of times and leave it be.

JL, is it not important to play in the CODE 4 format of two back to back games and virtually playing 2 more lines/codes, ? With this I mean your tested games were of CODE 4 hit and run games of this format.

[Johnlegend]

Hi JohnLegend,

Thank you for this latest and new approach. Those results are superb!
Also thanks for example 20 spin game of TRILOGY which makes it quite clear.
After game complete (20 spins) do you begin a new frame straight away or does it not matter?
A.

Hello Atlantis you had a part in this method as did AMK. Its been staring me in the face for ages. You play on and on if you like. Me personally I will play my classic 20 a day. But from what Ive seen this is a winner longterm. As always time will give me the number for strikerate.

[Johnlegend]

Perhaps 3Peat from the Jordan era is a better title

Many thanks again JohnLegend.

I hope that players which feel that this method is not effective only comment about this a couple of times and leave it be.

JL, is it not important to play in the CODE 4 format of two back to back games and virtually playing 2 more lines/codes, ? With this I mean your tested games were of CODE 4 hit and run games of this format.

Hi AMK 3PEAT LOL I think TRILOGY has a more classic feel about it. You play unitl you fall asleep if you like AMK. Ive had my fill of the likes of Bayes saying only hit and run can work for JL he is lucky or a liar. So any method I bring here from now on wont need hit and run. It will be able to generate profit anytime. This is the first. Ive played 20 games on the trot today and it was never tested. All won in two attempts. Ive waded through over 400 code 4 results and found two losses. Both had zeros interuppting the flow. That 26 units is going to be at least doubled longterm with this AMK..
I dont want any excuses from the usual crowd.

[atlantis]

Hi JL,

Here is my first attempt:

2b1c
3c2a - won at step 1 - doz 2
2b3z
1a1b
2z3c

In the above 20 spins there appears to be only one qualified win - A vertical match followed by 2 non-matches (trigger) did not occur after the win for the rest of the frame. Is that right? Thanks.

A.

[Johnlegend]

Hi JL,

Here is my first attempt:

2b1c
3c2a - won at step 1 - doz 2
2b3z----------------------------------Dozen 3 another potential win
1a1b----------------------------------Dozen 1 another potential win
2z3c

In the above 20 spins there appears to be only one qualified win - A vertical match followed by 2 non-matches (trigger) did not occur after the win for the rest of the frame. Is that right? Thanks.

A.

Right under the line you indicated a win Atlantis there was another potential win DOZEN 3 where I've indicated. And another with DOZEN 1 in the line below that. But you are only after ONE win per frame from left to right no vertical in this one Atlantis. Its a constant I've seen for ages.  Only now I've realized its so natural to random and Mr percentage. We don't know where but the vast majority of  the time that Trilogy is coming and our BR will grow as a result.

[albertojonas]

VERY NICE!


I like the randomization quality of the bet, not to mention the abandon of H&R strategies.
I am not so sure about the ALL IN progression, have to test it and see the kind of LW registry this bet delivers. Depending on that i would work out a money management and stop-loss to catch the gaussian bell curve. I believe this is cool procedure to any system.


Inevitably reverse mode will be approached =)


Good Job John.

[Johnlegend]

VERY NICE!


I like the randomization quality of the bet, not to mention the abandon of H&R strategies.
I am not so sure about the ALL IN progression, have to test it and see the kind of LW registry this bet delivers. Depending on that i would work out a money management and stop-loss to catch the gaussian bell curve. I believe this is cool procedure to any system.


Inevitably reverse mode will be approached =)


Good Job John.

Thankyou Albertojonas  I will be off on a mini vacation in the morning people so ask your questions but dont get frustrated if I dont get straight back. All will be anwsered eventually. Many thanks.

[atlantis]

Hi John,

Thought I understood it but I'm afraid I don't follow you... How and why did the other bets qualify?
Oh wait a minute... I think I gottit! You are not waiting for a *match* to occur first between qualifiers then?

A.

[Johnlegend]

Hi John,

Thought I understood it but I'm afraid I don't follow you... How and why did the other bets qualify?

A.

Anytime you have this examples below.
1,B,3,A
2,C*-----------We now bet the next spin won't be DOZEN 3. Or like below

2,A,1,B
2,A,2,C
*---------------We now bet that the next spin won't be DOZEN 2. We are only after one win in any 20 spin frame Atlantis always horizontaly left to right. It just so happenned there was three winners in your example. But we only chase one win. That's because that's the constant I've identified. A high number of 20 spin frames have at least one trilogy in them. Enough to make a profit. Which is what we want ultimately.

[albertojonas]

Thankyou Albertojonas  I will be off on a mini vacation in the morning people so ask your questions but don't get frustrated if I don't get straight back. All will be anwsered eventually. Many thanks.

You know i like to play around with random vs random bets.

I have no questions, just offering to tune this randomization idea to anything near a long term profit system.
I believe every good system should have 2 or 3 mm styles, from the most conservative to the most agressive. Sometimes this involves changing triggers also.
I like the way tendency is incorporated.
I like the way the attack is made after a Loss you wait for next trigger.
I Like the way you establish a window frame for the attack to occur -20 spins. This allows to multi step progressions in case of a loss.
I can see the potential in this. For a very conservative style, one would wait for that to occur in a 20 spin frame, then hope for correction.

Maybe you will crucify me for this, but i believe this is your best creation so far. =)
Have a nice Vacation!
Cheers

[Johnlegend]

You know i like to play around with random vs random bets.

I have no questions, just offering to tune this randomization idea to anything near a long term profit system.
I believe every good system should have 2 or 3 mm styles, from the most conservative to the most agressive. Sometimes this involves changing triggers also.
I like the way tendency is incorporated.
I can see the potential in this.
I like the way the attack is made after a Loss you wait for next trigger.


Maybe you will crucify me for this, but i believe this is your best creation so far. =)
Have a nice Vacation!
Cheers

I believe you are right Albertojonas, because it feels so natural to the flow of results. We arent asking random to deliver anything in a specific place or timeframe. Just allowing it to do its thing and pick off the winner in one to three attempts.