***TRILOGY***

[albertojonas]

This is Triology applied to the real spins taken from the competition that is happening currently at the other VLS forum.
Results for GAME 1


[attachimg=1]


[attachimg=2]

[Johnlegend]

This is Triology applied to the real spins taken from the competition that is happening currently at the other VLS forum.
Results for GAME 1


[attachimg=1]


[attachimg=2]

Nice graphics Albertojonas. Okay Im off to bed gotta be at airport early. Talk when I get back all the best people.

[atlantis]

JohnLegend wrote:

Okay Atlantis this one of my real results from my 150.
2,C,2,A----Lead off line
1,B,2,A----Bet 1 DOZEN 2 LOST
1,B,3,A
1,C,2,A----Bet 2 COLUMN A LOST
2,B,3,B----Bet 3 DOZEN 3 WON.
2,A,2,C----20 SPIN FRAME COMPLETE

Upon losing the first bet you simply wait for random to show you the next two non matches

Thank you. I could now follow that with the understanding that you are using continuous flow across the lines. I am no longer confused.

Wonderful stuff! 

A.

[albertojonas]

This is Triology applied to the real spins taken from the competition that is happening currently at the other VLS forum.
Results for GAME 2

[attachimg=1]


[attachimg=2]

[albertojonas]

after 15 TRILOGY "windows"

13 Wins
6 Losses
it means a profit of +1 unit flat betting
it means -13 units with the suggested progression 

As i promptly mentioned the mm should be tuned.
Lanky's Divisor would do the trick.


A conservative style would be attack the game after 2 or 3 Losses and it should work just fine, despite the time consumption.
Think of it as one more piece of your arsenal when playing matrix type systems.


Cheers

[mattymattz]

This is what I don't understand (so maybe JL or someone else can explain it better to me).

What difference does it make to wait for the triggers?  Would the results be the same simply by playing FTL?  In my opinion, I would think all the triggers do is delay the amount of betting you do, therefore slowing down the wins and loses. 

I've noticed that JL talks alot about Percentages, so maybe that's why, but perhaps he could explain it better to me.  If so, thanks. 

I only bring this up because AJ mentioned Lanky's Divisor Plan which he used to great success on the dozens, and he didn't wait for triggers like this system is suggesting.

MM

[albertojonas]

I only bring this up because AJ mentioned Lanky's Divisor Plan which he used to great success on the dozens, and he didn't wait for triggers like this system is suggesting.

MM

LOL
You are a very nice player too. I am enjoying your company. As for the divisor plan, i do not use it too often =)
but i get your point.

[GLC]

Alberto,

I want to make a suggestion that some might find worth testing.  I posted a money management progression called the forced win progression.  It is based on the idea of betting on even chances 1 then 2 then 3 then 4 then 5 etc... win or lose until you finally reach a new high, then reset to 1.

I adapted it to double dozens as follows:  bet 1-1 then bet 1-1 then bet 2-2 then bet 2-2 then bet 3-3 then bet 3-3 then bet 4-4 then bet 4-4 then bet 5-5 etc... win or lose until you finally reach a new high, then reset to 1-1.

The following is your win loss record for the 3 posts based on the real spins from VLS:

W   1-1   +1     Reset     +1
L    1-1    -2
L    1-1    -4
L    2-2    -8
W   2-2    -6
W   3-3    -3
L    3-3    -9
W   4-4    -5
W   4-4    -1
W   5-5   +4  (Note: you could only bet 2-2 to just reach +1)  Reset    +2  (or +5)
L    1-1    -2
L    1-1    -4
W   2-2    -2
W   2-2    0  (Note: you could bet 3-3 next since you haven't reached + yet)  Reset
W   1-1    +1                  +3
W   1-1    +1                  +4
W   1-1    +1                  +5
W   1-1    +1                  +6

We never had to bet too much and we didn't get too far in the hole.  I know there will be times when our bet sizes do get larger and we do go deeper in the hole,  but if the strike rate stays this high, it shouldn't get into trouble too often.

Cheers,
GLC   

[justanothergambler]

RESULTS UPDATE FOR 31/05/2012

TOTAL GAMES TESTED/PLAYED 150

TOTAL GAMES WON 150

TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 20 UNITS PLUS.

BREAKDOWN OF WINS.

STEP 1 WINS=78

STEP 2 WINS=46

STEP 3 WINS=26-----LOSSES ZERO.

I dnt think it has any diff than CODE4, but just an advise , why you are talking about money management and using that dangerous progression ? and the others also didnt notice that betting FOR it would benefice  more !
the win at step one almost is 50% of your total GAMES, second and third are not far away between them. bet FOR with a simple progression 1-1-1-2  if you insist with this kind of system. I dnt understand why the others didnt see that!!!??

and by the way it doesnt make any difference to wait 2 or 20 or 1000 spins... trials are independents and MuExcl.

[jarabo002]

Alberto,

I want to make a suggestion that some might find worth testing.  I posted a money management progression called the forced win progression.  It is based on the idea of betting on even chances 1 then 2 then 3 then 4 then 5 etc... win or lose until you finally reach a new high, then reset to 1.

I adapted it to double dozens as follows:  bet 1-1 then bet 1-1 then bet 2-2 then bet 2-2 then bet 3-3 then bet 3-3 then bet 4-4 then bet 4-4 then bet 5-5 etc... win or lose until you finally reach a new high, then reset to 1-1.

The following is your win loss record for the 3 posts based on the real spins from VLS:

W   1-1   +1     Reset     +1
L    1-1    -2
L    1-1    -4
L    2-2    -8
W   2-2    -6
W   3-3    -3
L    3-3    -9
W   4-4    -5
W   4-4    -1
W   5-5   +4  (Note: you could only bet 2-2 to just reach +1)  Reset    +2  (or +5)
L    1-1    -2
L    1-1    -4
W   2-2    -2
W   2-2    0  (Note: you could bet 3-3 next since you haven't reached + yet)  Reset
W   1-1    +1                  +3
W   1-1    +1                  +4
W   1-1    +1                  +5
W   1-1    +1                  +6

We never had to bet too much and we didn't get too far in the hole.  I know there will be times when our bet sizes do get larger and we do go deeper in the hole,  but if the strike rate stays this high, it shouldn't get into trouble too often.

Cheers,
GLC   

What can I say?

Mr. GLC, you are a f****ng genious!!!

[albertojonas]

What can I say?

Mr. GLC, you are a f****ng genious!!!

oooh you didn't know he was yet?

[Robeenhuut]

I think that this progression  makes sense. Of course if we get an excellent strike rate here then we will be ahead no matter what progression we use.

[peauke]

Okay,

I get the system and like it so far, but what about the green goblin  .

Let say:
1A2B
20*---------(bet doz 1-3 or skip and wait until the zero is gone in the tracking or skip the zero and wait for the next number in place for the zero).


Peauke

[Robeenhuut]

Okay,

I get the system and like it so far, but what about the green goblin  .

Let say:
1A2B
20*---------(bet doz 1-3 or skip and wait until the zero is gone in the tracking or skip the zero and wait for the next number in place for the zero).


Peauke

I think that you need 2 wait 4 answer from John. My guess is that if 0 hits we start tracking from d beginning. You need 2 consecutive non-matches not involving 0.

[Chauncy47]

Alberto,

I want to make a suggestion that some might find worth testing.  I posted a money management progression called the forced win progression.  It is based on the idea of betting on even chances 1 then 2 then 3 then 4 then 5 etc... win or lose until you finally reach a new high, then reset to 1.

I adapted it to double dozens as follows:  bet 1-1 then bet 1-1 then bet 2-2 then bet 2-2 then bet 3-3 then bet 3-3 then bet 4-4 then bet 4-4 then bet 5-5 etc... win or lose until you finally reach a new high, then reset to 1-1.

The following is your win loss record for the 3 posts based on the real spins from VLS:

W   1-1   +1     Reset     +1
L    1-1    -2
L    1-1    -4
L    2-2    -8
W   2-2    -6
W   3-3    -3
L    3-3    -9
W   4-4    -5
W   4-4    -1
W   5-5   +4  (Note: you could only bet 2-2 to just reach +1)  Reset    +2  (or +5)
L    1-1    -2
L    1-1    -4
W   2-2    -2
W   2-2    0  (Note: you could bet 3-3 next since you haven't reached + yet)  Reset
W   1-1    +1                  +3
W   1-1    +1                  +4
W   1-1    +1                  +5
W   1-1    +1                  +6

We never had to bet too much and we didn't get too far in the hole.  I know there will be times when our bet sizes do get larger and we do go deeper in the hole,  but if the strike rate stays this high, it shouldn't get into trouble too often.

Cheers,
GLC   

GLC, it is a great suggestion!  It is the betting progression that I use here in the States at the live casino's for all of the Hit & Run methods I play.  Because wins come on the first spin so often, it's a great strategy, especially for me with $5 min bets.  Just sharing ... Have a good weekend!