• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

The Rotating Flexibility Cross PDF

Started by ego, Jun 28, 01:12 PM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ego


Charting method using only four numbers plus rotor speed.
Strike point not necessary.
My own solution and my opinion easy and clever.
See attach file.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Robeenhuut

Agreed  Ego. U can only have success playing roulette betting few numbers flat.  Bet selection is d problem though here. Any set pattern will not deliver in d long run contrary 2 some established forum members opinions. 
Matt


ego


Physics and systems is not the same thing ...
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Robeenhuut

Quote from: ego on Jun 28, 01:52 PM 2012
Physics and systems is not the same thing ...

Who cares f they get d job done.  ;D
Matt

ego


Physics have positive expectation ( with right conditions )
Systems have negative expectation ...

No one can change that - sorry ...
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Robeenhuut

Quote from: ego on Jun 28, 02:00 PM 2012
Physics have positive expectation ( with right conditions )
Systems have negative expectation ...

No one can change that - sorry ...

Physics with right conditions translates into observing trends f rotor speed is a factor.
And if is not its just as good theory as any   ;D
Matt

ego


Well i agree that we disagree ...
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Drazen

Mr. Patrik i have one question about placing the bets after prediction.

Maybe can look like silly, but again maybe out of good importance?
I have never seen some expert was pointing focus on this.

So you can tell is it important and how much or not?

OK i.e., we have predicted number and because of overlap we got calculation that we should bet 9 number sector
let it be from 3-5 (34-23) for example.
Now when we are placing the bets on the table, is it matter how we will do it? I mean can we place bets in order excatly as numbers are on the ring, or that should be done concerning table layout from left to the right or vice versa.
Only this way one should also be able to organize in head ascenedingly numbers in split of a second of course.

Because doing excatly as numbers on the wheel we should go zig zag from one side of the table to another, and my line of thinking is that way we could easy draw dealers attention and easy spotting excat sector betting. Which i presume should be avoided as much as one can? Also excat playing bets as on the wheel could be annoying to other players so as you.


Or also one option bet "neighbouurs bet"  i mean ask announce 3-3 or 2-2 if won't allow + adding rest of number by yourself?

What would be the best to practice and to do in realy play after all?

Thanks and cheers

Drazen

rajucb12

You'll be able to just have success participating in a roulette betting handful of quantities toned. Gamble selection is usually d problem nevertheless below. Any fixed structure will never offer within d end counter 3 many recognized discussion board users' views.

rajucb12

Thanks for share it. Actually you possibly can solely be successful enjoying roulette bets several amounts level. Choice variety is the problem even though in this article. Just about any set pattern will not likely offer with n years to come contrary only two several proven community forum customers thoughts.

Auskaki

Hi Raju,

Welcome to the forum.

Guys,

Check out this set of numbers, they tend to follow each other very often. My observations from  spin results collected  from table games, live casino sites, casino e-monitor games with live spins.

Only 20 nos in all and you can play split bets or single bets as you like.

And the list.  0,2 6,9 11,12 14,15 13,16 19,20 24,27 28,31 29,30 and finally 32,35.

Wait for one of the 20 nos to turn up and then place bets (20 nos individually or 10 set of splits). Otherwise be patient and be amazed as they start to appear, often with repeats too. When the streak ends, wait for the next magical momemt to appear again. Good luck.  Note: Move around each table and only bet when the dealer spins the 20 nos. very often.


luckyfella

Quote from: Auskaki on Apr 20, 05:07 AM 2014
Hi Raju,

Welcome to the forum.

Guys,

Check out this set of numbers, they tend to follow each other very often. My observations from  spin results collected  from table games, live casino sites, casino e-monitor games with live spins.

Only 20 nos in all and you can play split bets or single bets as you like.

And the list.  0,2 6,9 11,12 14,15 13,16 19,20 24,27 28,31 29,30 and finally 32,35.

Wait for one of the 20 nos to turn up and then place bets (20 nos individually or 10 set of splits). Otherwise be patient and be amazed as they start to appear, often with repeats too. When the streak ends, wait for the next magical momemt to appear again. Good luck.  Note: Move around each table and only bet when the dealer spins the 20 nos. very often.

As I said in my earlier post3, you're experimenting on the right track. To nail it u've got to lock in on target n not the open float model above. Keep trying post4
Goodbye everyone - 20/10/2019

ozon

why it should work  in  long  run ?      -200 units in   first  session   , Dublinbet.

ego


There is a misunderstanding here, the method is not a system, is a way go get offset when you predict where the ball will land before it has.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

-