Pattern Complete

[albertojonas]

This is a copy of last post on John Legend Pattern Breaker Thread...



-I believe it is more productive long term to play for all patterns showing than not.
-When you are tracking even chances in clusters of 3 outcomes you can get 8 different patterns. That is ok!
RRR
RRB
RBR
RBB


BBB
BBR
BRB
BRR
==================
What you say is that you wait for 7 of this patterns to show up and then bet the missing pattern will appear correct?
==================


What i say is that you can make things "colorblind" and instead of R/B, E/O, H/L you can observe what happens regarding change of state.
Once for all i wanted this to be clear so we are all on the same page.


You see 1st outcome RED and 2nd BLACK you observe a change.
so What i purpose is this notation (Not new):
XO
being: X=Same, O=Other
if 3rd outcome is RED again it will become
XOX because it is again same as 1st.


So basically all the 8 patterns above mentioned can be translated in only 4.



RRR   XXX
RRB   XXO
RBR   XOX
RBB   XOO


BBB   XXX
BBR   XXO
BRB   XOX
BRR   XOO


Hope it is easy to grasp.
The advantage is this way you get triggers to bet on more quickly, maintaining the same probability.
============
Following your system, one would wait for 3 of the above patterns to show and then bet for the 4th to show up.


Cheers

[albertojonas]

Quote from: Johnlegend on June 30, 2012, 12:23:20 PMSo the idea Donik7777 is to cover 1---3 attempts using the classic 1,2,4 progression. Here is an example of a trigger for the first attempt.

PATTERN 8 IS HLH

LLL
HHL
HL------TRIGGER for attempt one to complete the 8th pattern

With a strikerate currently of 19/1 its well worth the wait. I would be happy with 10/1---12/1 as the original PATTERN BREAKER delivers. Its all worth it in the end if positive numbers are your reward.


This is what i am talking about above 

[albertojonas]

There you go 9900 spins in clusters of 3.
Be truthful an see what happens in a considerable amount of spins.
Zero is considered High when tracking but should be considered a Loss on playing outside the table.


On the pdf both High/Low and suggested notation are represented.


Draw your conclusions.[attachimg=1]

[bossdarling]

Thank you, Jonas. Could you explain the following:

20    20    15    H    H    L    X    X    O       
35    4    12    H    L    L    X    O    O       
16    21    7    L    H    L    X    O    X    Bet    
We know that XXX is missing.
When and what do we bet? Waiting further spin as X (for instance the next spin is H, consider it as X, then bet the next 2 spins as HH)??

Or we take the last number (7) or L as "X", then bet 3 spins on LLL??

Pls excuse my stupid question 

[albertojonas]

first spin of a new group of 3 is always X
=)
but please mind this is just silly explorations...

[TwoCatSam]

Using the above example"

X X O
X O O
X O X
X X _

The _ would be an X (same) to complete the pattern.  I agree so far.

Now, considering spin_, what in the world of logic, math, or physics gives that last X a greater chance of appearing than O?

This is where I part company with JL as he says, roughly now--not an exact quote--that the strike rate is 19-1.  To me that is tantamount to saying that  X will appear nineteen out of twenty spins.  I reiterate the above question:  How is this possible without smoke and mirrors and tons of Voodoo?

Sam