• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Every system can win in the short-term. It just depends on the spins you play.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Voyager System - To boldly go...

Started by buffalowizard, Jul 06, 04:20 PM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

buffalowizard

Hello,


Divide the layout into groups of 9........


1 =   1-9


2 =   9-18


3 =   19-27


4 =   28-36


Tracking involves waiting for three spins, whereby only 2 groups of the 9 appear, such as:


1 2 2


or:


4 3 4


or:


3 1 1   etc etc


Then, simply, bet for three spins on the other 2 groups!!!   Simples...


Example:


2
3
2   <trigger to now bet groups 1,4
2   L
4   W


That's one mini game, now restart tracking:


1
3
3  <trigger
1  L
2  W


................


4
2

2  L
1  W


................


3
3
1
4  W


................


2
2
1
1  L
2  L
3  W


Progression up to you...1,2,4 perhaps then double up on restart? 2 consecutive losses maybe rare.


BW

buffalowizard

Just to clarify:


If you get groups like this


1
3
4


That's a no bet, and you must wait for only 2 groups to appear within the nearest 3 spins


1
3
4   NB
2   NB
2   BET GROUPS 3 AND 1
1   WIN


If a zero gets in the way of tracking, as in;


1
3
0


Then I retrack from after the zero...just for my own voodoo satisfaction


BW

GLC

So if 2 of the 9 number sectors sleep for 3 spins, bet the other 2 sectors for up to 3 times if no win.


That means they will have to sleep for 6 spins to lose.


I know that this is reverse engineering, but just from your example, it looks like if they slept for 4 spins, you'd still get plenty of bets and could still bet for 3 spins or you could only bet for 2 tries and save some money whenever a sector sleeps 6 times.
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

buffalowizard

Quote from: GLC on Jul 06, 05:48 PM 2012
So if 2 of the 9 number sectors sleep for 3 spins, bet the other 2 sectors for up to 3 times if no win.


That means they will have to sleep for 6 spins to lose.


I know that this is reverse engineering, but just from your example, it looks like if they slept for 4 spins, you'd still get plenty of bets and could still bet for 3 spins or you could only bet for 2 tries and save some money whenever a sector sleeps 6 times.


Yes GLC,
It is essentially an EC bet, betting in the second half of a potential 6 loss.


It could be mixed around a number of ways, including the ones you suggest. There are pro's and con's to each, I have only looked into waiting for 3, as it seemed to be a happy medium.


Obviously I will run some tests.


Cheers mate

buffalowizard


Using my trusty thomas grant actuals:


Original way:

Number/Sector/Win-Loss


22 3
20 3
16 2
36 4 W
13 2
6  1
34 4
11 1
1  1 L
21 3 W
2  1 
26 3
23 3
34 4 W
17 2
12 2
13 2
19 3
18 2 L
1  1 W
34 4
16 2
5  1
30 4
8  1
17 2 W
14 2
12 2
19 3
35 4 W
6  1
3  1
11 2
12 2 L
23 3 W
26 3
5  1
23 3
10 2 W
15 2
7  1
25 3
15 2
6  1
26 3
7  1
15 2 W
28 4
3  1
14 2
19 3
21 3
26 3 L
36 4 W
19 3
36 4
18 2
24 3
10 2
17 2 L
22 3 L
30 4 W
12 2
35 4
21 3
32 4
5  1 W
8  2
19 3
12 2
25 3 L
23 3 L
31 4 W
22 3
21 3
10 2
29 4 W
28 4
14 2
24 3
21 3
5  1 W
20 3
17 2
35 4
28 4
9  1 W
7  1
34 4
33 4
10 2 W
25 3
29 4
9  1
34 4
30 4 L
4  1 L
16 2 W
33 4
28 4
20 3
21 3 L
17 2 W

buffalowizard


Numbers continued.... 1 three loss so far....not bad really for EC bet


16 2
33 4
24 3
32 4
22 3 L
2  1 W
19 3
6  1
9  1
18 2 W
12 2
22 3
12 2
5  1 W
33 4
32 4
16 2
23 3 W
2  1
28 4
25 3
36 4
33 4 L
5  1 W
27 3
30 4
2  1
31 4
29 4 L
24 3 W
21 3
20 3
14 2
25 3 L
33 4 W
19 3
24 3
12 2
24 3 L
15 2 L
26 3 L 3LOSS - RETRACK
30 4
8  1
12 2
9  1
3  1 L
35 4 W
2  1
35 4
18 2
10 2
29 4 L
17 2 L
22 3 W
6  1
16 2
14 2
3  1 L
36 4 W
12 2
27 3
3  1
35 4
24 3
2  1
21 3
9  1 L
34 4 W
6  1
23 3
15 2
14 2
4  1 W
2  1
2  1
10 2
34 4 W
20 3
3  1
13 2
24 3
25 3
9  1 W
22 3
32 4
11 2
28 4
2  1 W
10 2
9  1
27 3
6  1
34 4 W
14 2
27 3
8  1
20 3
8  1 L
36 4 W
24 3
5  1
4  1
32 4 W
15 2
29 4
24 3
16 2
33 4
26 3
22 3
16 2 W
23 3
6  1
10 2
35 4
10 2
11 2 L
9  1 W
3  1
16 2
20 3
26 3
29 4 W

Master_of_pockets

And why this system can be any better than applying the same concept on the dozens?
Never agrue with silly people.They will drag you down to their own level and then beat you with experience.***Mark Twain***

buffalowizard

Quote from: Master_of_pockets on Jul 06, 07:02 PM 2012
And why this system can be any better than applying the same concept on the dozens?


Because 4 is different to 3 - therefore the behaviour is different


Applied to dozens, it would become a 12 number bet - this is 18 and has good hit rate


Give it a go and see what you think

Master_of_pockets

"""therefore the behaviour is different"""

Same behaviour. Win less lose more.
The -2.7 is still there.

Anyway I am letting you continue with ur testing mate.
Never agrue with silly people.They will drag you down to their own level and then beat you with experience.***Mark Twain***

GLC

BW

You're tempting me with those results.  Don,t you know I'm too busy right now.  Or should I drop everything else and help you test this.

Okay, It does look like it wins often enough on the 4th spin to start betting there.
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

GLC

I'm attaching a document with a test run on it rather than type it here.
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

Wally Gator

George, it appears BW is resetting after a win.  You're spreadsheet is played continuously.  Good result either way, but it's good to know which rules we're using for testing.  Thanks.
A person with a new idea is a crank until the idea succeeds. ~ Mark Twain

Robeenhuut

Quote from: Master_of_pockets on Jul 06, 07:09 PM 2012
"""therefore the behaviour is different"""

Same behaviour. Win less lose more.
The -2.7 is still there.

Anyway I am letting you continue with your testing mate.

Hola MOP

Aren't u by any chance  Roulette Explorer?  U remind me of his inquisitive style.
He disappeared from d forum some time ago but everybody always comes bk here. They just use different aliases  ;D Recently we had Vile aka FLAT, FL aka John Gold n u would complete 3 play.

Regards
Matt

GLC

Quote from: Wally Gator on Jul 06, 11:11 PM 2012
George, it appears BW is resetting after a win.  You're spreadsheet is played continuously.  Good result either way, but it's good to know which rules we're using for testing.  Thanks.
Wally,  One of the nice things about a system as easy as this one is that when you have the whole session posted for all to see,  you can check out your favorite bet method because it's just a matter of a series of wins and losses which you can apply you own progression to.

I didn't restart my progression after each attack because BW said that you could use any progression you liked.  Next I'm going to play a session using Trioplay method.

Cheers,

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

GLC

 The following are the beginning spins from the 15,000  Zumma roulette spins.  Please note that these are the same spins as I used in the attachment a few posts above.

I will play them according to Trioplay.

13           2
9              1
22           3
32           4
2              1
6              1
13           2
6              1              L              -1            2         -1           
21           3              W            +1                        0
18           2
15           2
24           3              L               -1            2          -1
18           2              L              -1            3           -2
21           3              L              -1            4          -3
32           4              W            +1                       -2
9              1
34           4
3              1              L              -2           5          -4
32           4              L              -2            6          -6
5              1              L              -2           7          -8
26           3              W            +2                       -6
19           3
31           4              W            +4                       -2
2              1
6              1
3              1              L              -6             8         -8
9              1              L              -6             9         -14
1              1              L              -6            10        -20
29           4              L              -6             11        -26
5              1              L              -6            12         -32
18           2              W            +6                         -26
19           3
26           3
30           4              W            +9                        -17
00           
31           4
17           2              W            +12                      -5     Bet = Count  Partial reset to 6
26           3              W            +6                        +1
20           3
17           2              L              -1            2           -1
30           4              W            +1                          0
22           3
14           2
29           4
25           3
12           2
3              1
22           3
14           2
30           4
26           3
5              1
32           4
26           3
21           3
12           2              W            +1                        +1
36           4              W            +1                        +1
11           2
1              1              W            +1                        +1
00
28           4
36           4
24           3              W            +1                         +1                 
3
32           4              L              -1           2              -1
27           3              L              -1           3              -2
11           2              W            +1                           -1
5              1
25           3
22           3
4              1              L              -2            4              -3
11           2              W            +2                            -1
34           4

total of +5 units
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

-