Another Dozen Method (had some good results)

[Igorr]

Hi, I haven’t een here for a while, but I see that my countrymen F_LAT_INO and Drazen are still very active

I haven’t contributed much to this great forum so far, but a few days ago I got an idea that I would like to share so that you can see if it has potential, and can be upgraded...

I focused on dozen, but numbers were the trigger, and I started using this method:

1. I wait for 8 numbers to show up in one dozen (more than 2/3 of the numbers in that dozen). Firstly that was important for me because I was waiting for 8 unique numbers, but later I started to bet after any 8 numbers in one dozen.
2. When we get 8th number to show up we start betting right away. We bet on that dozen once. If we win â€" that’s it for that dozen.
3. If we loose the first bet, we bet again the next time that dozen hit. We do the same with progression until we get a win.

I know that this method is perhaps just another pattern chaser, but I wanted to share it so that maybe someone can dig out something more clever than me (I’m not that roulette savy as most of you guys). By betting only once after dozen hits we awoid for that dozen to become cold. We basicly bet that it would repeat the next spin. I am not sure we should even wait for 8 numbers in the first place to show up, but that is how I tested because I wanted for more than 2/3 of the numbers to show up before I start betting (but later I didn’t care about 8 uniques, just any 8 numbers in dozen).

RESULTS: This is why I posted this in the first place. I used real spins that drazen shared here somewhere (6000 spins). I didn’t play it all, just about 50 sessions (following all 3 dozens simultaniously). The result is â€" about 3/4 wins in max. 5 bets, only once I went to 11th  step of progression. Now, if someone could test it more, and recommend which progression to use, that would be great. Perhaps, with the right tool man could follow all dozens and columns, and bet whenever there is a trigger. That could be pretty fast game. Also, testing should be made to see where is the best place to stop and accept the loss and reset.

I hope you’ll also get good results. Perhaps my results were just pure luck. If this method isn't any good, or it's a copy of someone else's method, don’t kill me, just shred this thread