• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

"System junkies" large number bets

Started by RouletteGhost, Apr 01, 05:57 PM 2016

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RouletteGhost

It is flat bet. Each bet is independent

Step 1 is 5 units

Next bet is 12 units

Etc

My math question is this: analyze the 3 steps. Whats the odds of losing all 3?

Look at the 3 bets. Chances of losing all 3? Answer that
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

Im not winkel. I have thick skin. Im not going anywhere. So answer it.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

The General

QuoteStep 1- Bet 3 units on low, 2 units on 3rd dozen continuously. On a loss we are down 5 units, now go to step 2. Unless we are up, then stay.

Step 2- Now bet 6 units on dozen 2 and 3. If lose we are down 17 units, and goto step 3

Step 3- Bet 18 units on each of 5 Double Streets one time. If win reset.

Get the idea? Change the bet with large number amounts so that our chances of winning are increased.



You're increasing your bet at each step.  It's not flat bet.
Here are the facts:  There's no reason that your bets should have an effect on the house edge.  This means that every bet has a negative expectation.
If you add the progression, then you're simply subjecting even more money to the house edge.  This means that you will lose even more than if you were to flat bet one unit.

It's not worth calculating the odds, because the probability of success is still lower than what house is willing to payout.

Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

RouletteGhost

Your a math boy

Answer me

Step 1. 30 numbers

Step 2. 24 numbers.

Step 3. 30 numbers.

Whats odds of losing all 3?
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

Mathematical odds

Losing 3 bets in a row

30 numbers
24 numbers
30 numbere

Losing all 3. Odds?

Are we ahead on a loss?
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

The General

Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

RouletteGhost

30 numbers

24 numbers

30 numbers

Odds?
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

If i walk up to a roulette table

And bet 30 numbers

Then 24.

Then 30. What is my chances or losing all 3

Answer the question
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

You dont answer questions

You just spew the same shit

Good night
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

The General

It will fail about once every 71 spins.

Sorry but you're wasting your time with this one. 
You need to read a bit more on roulette.

Visit the wizardofodds.com
Also research the "gambler's fallacy".

Question:  Was 12 minutes too long to wait for your answer?  Sorry but I had to run to the kitchen for moment.  LOL!
Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

RouletteGhost

Quote from: The General on Apr 02, 11:11 PM 2016
It will fail about once every 71 spins.

Sorry but you're wasting your time with this one. 
You need to read a bit more on roulette.

Visit the wizardofodds.com
Also research the "gambler's fallacy".

Question:  Was 12 minutes too long to wait for your answer?  Sorry but I had to run to the kitchen for moment.  LOL!

Meh

Not into wizard of odds

If i was i wouldnt be here

Ill post my test results tomorrow

Actual test. Not words
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

The General

Why do you post such questions on a public forum and then get angry when someone provides you with factual answers?


Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

RouletteGhost

Ok

I play my way. You play your way.

Everyones dumb. General. Xander. Herb. Is not dumb.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

The General

Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

RouletteGhost

Quote from: The General on Apr 02, 11:22 PM 2016
Why did you post the question?

To spar with you. Cause i know your "in town"
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

-