*PATTERN BREAKER*

[Ruprekht]

John, wouldn't you like pay your attention to outside bet?

[Johnlegend]

John, wouldn't you like pay your attention to outside bet?

Outside Bet? Ruprekht I am playing the method as I have played it for over 3.5 years. With constant success. I am at a stage where I am not going to push or work on anymore ideas on this forum. My major efforts will be towards building as powerful a BR as possible for spring next year when I hit Europe. The four methods I employ and endorse will be used then. Especially PATTERN BREAKER, DIVIDE AND CONQUER and CODE 4. VERTICAL 8 still has a lot of proofing to do.

I have one method I am testing currently unknown to the forum. Its not my brainchild but looks very strong. There is no more for me to do here. I am more than dis-appointed with the lack of staying power shown by other members on this forum but hardly surprised. We live in a superficial world afterall.

So if youve found a way to profit good. Keep pressing forward. My contributions on this forum are done. I will only come back here to update my 4 methods. And anwser any queeries related to them as of now.

[Ruprekht]

 ...

[Johnlegend]

I invented system, that consistently wins. I used you because (as I think) u r a thinking person. I don't want to post it in front off all (lazy, silly and selfish people). Besides, two heads are better than one. And if this system really will survive, it doesn't blow the market of gambling because only 2 people know it. ....

Then email it to me or PM me with it Ruprekht. And I will look at it seriously and come back to you.

Regards JL...

[Robeenhuut]

Then email it to me or PM me with it Ruprekht. And I will look at it seriously and come back to you.

Regards JL...

Hello Ruprekht

We can not wait to get details of your system here.  And if you are not ready to post anything of substance here i suggest  that you take your business elsewhere.
Unless you have Holy Grail method of course 


Regards

[rolf-harris]

Since there are eight possible patterns that can be left why do we have to wait for the roulette wheel to give us dozens to cross off the patterns..to leave one?
It would be easier to place eight numbered balls in a bag and shake them then pick one out at random  to give us the pattern to bet against....
It seems to me the odds of winning any particular coup are always 7 to one in our favour no matter how the pattern is picked.......are these considered good odds when playing roulette?...and thats without the zero coming up!!! ..I would always prefer my odds of winning to be in the high 90s (percentage wise ) on any system
Maybe I'm missing something..but....If anyone can enlighten me I am ready to eat Humble Pie.

[woods101]

Hi Rolf,
Maybe you could enlighten us with your 9/10 instead of knocking someone else's 8/1?
Surely it would be impolite (and very un-Australian) not to do so.
Mmmm. What are the odds?

Woods

P.s. Why don't you check some more of JL's threads to get a better idea of where he's coming from. It might help you to see what he is implying through his methodology.

[rolf-harris]

I was making an observation, thats all... what is the forum for if its percieved as "knocking" when one does that..
I believe what I said about the odds are correct..so do you disagree?.. am I wrong ?....

[rolf-harris]

Yes, I will have a look thru' JL's posts as you advised.
Being new to this forum I am slowly beginning to realise that there is more to roulette than the straight forward odds that are facing us...things such as trends, money management etc which can be utilised to try and defeat the odds or at least make them more favourable to us winning.
As for my own ideas I was thinking that if the runs of 3 (giving 8 options ) were increased to 4 ( giving errr.....a lot more ) then there will be more combinations in our favour.
I realise we will have to be prepared to go an extra stage in the betting progression but it may be achievable if we start with a bigger  bank roll or lower the size of the initial unit.
Anyhow, thats the way I was thinking of going...
Probably when I get to read more of the posts I will maybe find that someone has already come up with this idea..maybe in the name of a different system to this one..
Anyhow ....got to get back to my Diggery-Do....

[woods101]

Hi Rolf,
JL's ideas are generally based on the idea that by utilising hit and run theory, you can increase the odds in your favour. This is a controversial, but very old discussion and you'll find this being discussed by him and others elsewhere.
This thread is long but if your curious then have a read thru as many questions will have been asked along the way previously.
Welcome to the forum by the way. This is a great place for a whole heap of resources (actual spins, systems, coding etc) as well as some very skilled mathematicians and some very experienced players (whether any of them are better off for it in the long run, who knows!) but most are friendly and happy to help. New people/ideas are always welcome.

Enjoy your walkabout!

Woods

[woods101]

As for my own ideas I was thinking that if the runs of 3 (giving 8 options ) were increased to 4 ( giving errr.....a lot more ) then there will be more combinations in our favour.
I realise we will have to be prepared to go an extra stage in the betting progression but it may be achievable if we start with a bigger  bankroll or lower the size of the initial unit.

I think this may have got covered earlier. How far a progression you decide to play can have a large bearing on results. You'll see this being discussed with a lot of systems here. Bankroll and personal preference have alot to do with it. Some like to play maybe a 2 or 3 stage prog, others will play crazy martingales quite happily. Each to their own.

Woods

[Mudiru]

I just want to say it took me 3 days to read the full Pattern Breaker! While reading it i was redirected to Pattern 4 which was created during tests with Patterk Breaker and i started reading that thread also, from there i got carried to CODE 4 which is a lot like Pattern 4.

Last night after i finished reading i went for a LIVE Session using Pattern 4 H/L E/O at the same time. With only 30units BANKROLL after 84 spins i got +28 units = 58units. No loss. After this i got greedy and bet all on a color and lost but the point is the system was working.

I would like to give many thanks to those who SHARE and those who TEST! I am really glad i found this forum and i'm able to interact with better people than me!
As i see i still got Divide & Conquer , CODE 4 , VERTICAL 8 , MV5 to read and i got a headache.
Why i post here is because i want to find out if people still use this SYSTEM? I WANT TO START WITH A SYSTEM AND STOP AT 20UNITS A DAY. ONCE I GET IT STARTED I WILL POST EVERYDAY IF WHETHER I GOT +20UNITS OR LOST.
All i need is an advice about which ONE OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED SYSTEMS TO USE AND A PROGRESSION METHOD!
Many thanks to all replying on this forum! I'm sorry i wrote this much i just got too excited!

[figjams95]

Looks like a great system...simple to stat and simple to bet on...
My question 2 is this...how do we bet?
Examples would be easiest...
EG We get to the last pattern to bet against.  We win the very 1st bet.
Do we then start the session all over again?
If we lose all 3 bets on the last pattern and restart another session, how do we bet from there?
IE What is your betting progression method...?
Sounds like a very simple system to stat up...
Cheers
Peter

[amk]

Hello Mudiru,

Take a look at the method "jhon legend try this one".............

Look at croco's second reply.................

That is the way to go............

If you start that method of playing keep us updated on that thread..........

[ego]

I think this may have got covered earlier. How far a progression you decide to play can have a large bearing on results. You'll see this being discussed with a lot of systems here. Bankroll and personal preference have a lot to do with it. Some like to play maybe a 2 or 3 stage prog, others will play crazy martingales quite happily. Each to their own.

Woods

Well i have to agree - if some one would use short attacks and different levels using progressions i would recommend fibo - even if it would not give you winnings as fast as other options.
The benifit using fibo is that you win back the two previos loses and when the bad swings strikes you accept losses to certan degree witch i think is much better then aim to get all in.