• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

1 unit each visit

Started by ego, Dec 17, 10:36 AM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

6th-sense

Quote from: ego on Dec 22, 08:29 AM 2018
+80 units
Well done ego looking foreword to your daily results

ego

Hello 6TH-SENSE - I randomly pick wheels and randomly times each day - play several sessions or only once.
+109 Units

The parachute depends on 100% on luck as I use 100% random selection for each session.
I want to see how long Lotto probability last.

No one can claim or argue that I use any kind of fallacies.

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Shogun

Good start ego. 
Looking forward to following your results.

Roulettebeater

Quote from: ego on Dec 22, 08:29 AM 2018
+80 units

You just invented this strafet a few days ago and you are already at +80 units ?

I thought you want to win only one unit per day !

+80 units ? That’s 80 days profits !
A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

ego


Yes, I play several sessions each day and now +121 units. - the base bet is 2 units.
That is less than 60 sessions.

Cheers

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

belekoks

Good job mate.

I do 4 units a day (5eu per unit.)

100-120 units a month

Pays my bills

Tekunda

Quote from: ego on Dec 24, 05:33 AM 2018
Yes, I play several sessions each day and now +121 units. - the base bet is 2 units.
That is less than 60 sessions.

Cheers

So you do not aim at one unit a day, if your base bet is already two units.
Also a confusing way of counting.
One unit stays one unit, no matter the dollar value.
If you start with a $5 unit and invest 2 units and win, than you have won 2 units, so your claim of winning 1 unit a day makes no sense.
And what is more important: how many units do you allow yourself to loose per day?
What is your stop-loss since you can't be winning every day?
And what do you do if you are several units into the hole?

ego


Tekunda I will answer your questions.
Maybe there would be more correct to say at least +1 unit each day.

The main idea is that I would earn more money then getting interest from the bank each year.
You never find Banks giving you 10% 5% interest, most you might expect is 1% or 2%

Now I know and understand that all methods fail and tank or bust.
Maybe its imaginary but I have made my own risk management where I decide is worth risking a certain amount of money to get some % as a return of investment.

My win target is my stop loss and I aim to win 1/3 of the amount I risk to operate with casino money with a lower base bet.
The selection has a 99.9% probability to succeed and I won over 1000 sessions using simulations and now play with real money on Unibet.

Cheers

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Tekunda

Quote from: ego on Dec 26, 12:43 PM 2018




My win target is my stop loss and I aim to win 1/3 of the amount I risk to operate with casino money with a lower base bet.
The selection has a 99.9% probability to succeed and I won over 1000 sessions using simulations and now play with real money on Unibet.

Cheers

Do you use a progression or do you flat bet?

ego

Tekunda i use progression and i parachute.

Let me tell you about the selection, that is the interesting part.
I test to see how often a final target number fail to show during 100 trails.

This is the list of my testing.

1) Your favourite number
2) Hot & Cold number
3) Back to back number
4) Random

All selections gave the same results, one final target number fail to show six times or less in 100 trail sample.
Now that is around 95% of success winning all the other times.

That moment when the final target number fail the parachute with above 98.5% probability to win and 1.5% to lose has to fail in that exact same moment the final target number fail to show.
You have to grasp and understand that the likelihood for that to happen is very rare.
And upon that, the parachute has ten steps with 50% each to hit at least once during the process.

Yes it will fail and the parachute will bust - but I am prepared to risk my money to gain 1/3 of the cost for the parachute and operate with casino money.
At the moment I am up +128 units and taking a break.
The reason is that I find an even better way to parachute.

No one can claim or argue that I use any fallacies.
I play random for each unit I earn and my win target for each session is at least +1 unit.
My parachute will lose and fail, but that will feel like winning the lottery.
And if I operate with casino money when that happens I just start over, I mean what is the odds winning the lottery twice.

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Let Me Win

I could give a parachute with a 99.92% probability of success.

A total bust would lose 1,800 units and a win at any step would make a minimum of 1 unit profit.


Winner

Quote from: Let Me Win on Dec 26, 03:10 PM 2018
I could give a parachute with a 99.92% probability of success.

A total bust would lose 1,800 units and a win at any step would make a minimum of 1 unit profit.
Ok

Let Me Win

Check out this bad boy  >:D.  Credit to Turbo

Even chance bets
1
2
4
8
16
32


Dozens
32
48


Lines
29
35
42
50


Corners
38
43
48


Streets
39
43
47


Splits
33
35
37
42
45
48
50


Straight number
26
27
28
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
45
46
47
49
50


That's it.  All you have to do is win just 1 of these 49 bets to reach +1.


If you happen to lose all 49 bets, it will cost you 1783 units.

Chance you have of making your 1 unit:

1 - (19/37)6 x (25/37)2 x (31/37)4 x (33/37)3 x (34/37)3 x (35/37)7 x (36/37)24

= 99.92%



Buffster


ego

Let Me Win where did you find that parachute method, I would like to read the original topic.
I collect all parachute topics and save them as PDF for further development.


Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

-