• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

MEISEL METHOD #2

Started by Richard Meisel, May 02, 06:39 PM 2020

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Richard Meisel

Here is another of my Methods. This is Betting on any 2 Dozens and any 1 Column. I prefer staying on the number that just Spun. For instance the Spin was 20, Bet 1 Unit on the 2nd Dozen any any other Dozen and Bet on the Middle Column. I prefer 100 as the Unit but let's use 10 as the Unit. Every Spin we will have 4 different decisions: WL, LW, WE, and LL. The WL is 20 -10 -10 = 0. The LW is -20 +20 = 0. The WW is +20 +10 = 30. The LL is -10 -20 = -30. So what is nice with this Method is all the WL and LW are even. The only money decisions are the WW and LL. In the 2 Dozens we have a 63% chance of Winning (24/38), and a 37% chance of Losing (14/38). In the Column bet we have a 32% chance of Winning (12/38), and a 68% chance of Losing (26/38). Doing all the math we come to the mathematical odds that in every 100 Spins we should get 43 WL, 12 LW, 20 WW, and 25 LL. When we get a  0 or a 0-0 we do a Virtual no Bet if you're following the Spin for a Repeat. If not, then no Virtual bet. What is nice about this Losing System is that I've found very seldom 4 consecutive Losses among all the non decisions. I think this Method is ripe for a Martingale. Someone please check the consecutive Losses.

2BobBet

Interesting method , can you post an example please.

Im not sure on what you mean by virtual no bet ?

Do you mean if the number hits the column or dozen ? or both ?


RP501

Quote from: Richard Meisel on May 02, 06:39 PM 2020What is nice about this Losing System is that I've found very seldom 4 consecutive Losses among all the non decisions. I think this Method is ripe for a Martingale.

With 4 consecutive losses -- what is the Table Limit that you're playing with?  Covering 28 numbers is pretty steep, looks kinda risky to me.  You might get lucky for a while, but long-term it will eventually go bust.  Unless you're extremely lucky, like people who's been driving all their lives, and have NEVER been in a car accident.   ;)
If you believe it is IMPOSSIBLE to win at Roulette long-term, then you will never win. ... But, if you believe anything is possible, then you will find the way.

ati

10000 no zero spins test

consecutive losses:
7; one time
6; one time
5; five times
4; 28 times
3; 101 times
2; 392 times

consecutive wins:
6; three times
5; four times
4; 16 times
3; 70 times
2; 351 times

Max consecutive zero result is 12.
Five or more consecutive zero results happened 492 times

huskerdu

Another variation is playing the last 2 dozens and last 2 columns, covering 32 numbers.:
When both win: +2 units.
When only one dozen or column wins: -1 unit
When lose both: -4 units.

Chances (theoriticaly):

44,5% ; win 2 units
44,5% : lose 1 unit
11% : lose 4 units

Method of recovery:
You play the half of the total amount of losing units, waiting for the moment that a win hit of both dozens+columns will occurs. eg. if you have lost 6 units you play  3 units on each dozen and column and if both hit you win 6 units. recover all lost bankroll. If the total amount of losings is growing big then you just determine a limit of bet on every dozen-column (e.g. 6 units - total 24 units) and flat bet.

Richard Meisel

Quote from: ati on May 03, 05:22 AM 2020
10000 no zero spins test

consecutive losses:
7; one time
6; one time
5; five times
4; 28 times
3; 101 times
2; 392 times

consecutive wins:
6; three times
5; four times
4; 16 times
3; 70 times
2; 351 times

Max consecutive zero result is 12.
Five or more consecutive zero results happened 492 times
.    Thank you very much, Ati. This goes with my original calculations that there will be 25 LL to 20 WW in every 100 Spins. Just a 1.5% Lost to Win ratio giving this Method a wonderful try with the dreaded Martingale.

Richard Meisel

Sorry, just a 1.25% Loss to Win ratio. Wonderful odds for a Martingale or even the dreaded Super Martingale progression.

Richard Meisel

Quote from: huskerdu on May 03, 06:01 AM 2020
Another variation is playing the last 2 dozens and last 2 columns, covering 32 numbers.:
When both win: +2 units.
When only one dozen or column wins: -1 unit
When lose both: -4 units.

Chances (theoriticaly):

44,5% ; win 2 units
44,5% : lose 1 unit
11% : lose 4 units

Method of recovery:
You play the half of the total amount of losing units, waiting for the moment that a win hit of both dozens+columns will occurs. eg. if you have lost 6 units you play  3 units on each dozen and column and if both hit you win 6 units. recover all lost bankroll. If the total amount of losings is growing big then you just determine a limit of bet on every dozen-column (e.g. 6 units - total 24 units) and flat bet.
Big difference between your another variation (LW=-1, WL=-1, LL=-4, WW=2) and mine (LW=0, WL=0, LL=-3, WW=3).

huskerdu

Quote from: Richard Meisel on May 04, 01:06 PM 2020Big difference between your another variation (LW=-1, WL=-1, LL=-4, WW=2) and mine (LW=0, WL=0, LL=-3, WW=3).

Yes, but you have less chances to win and more chances to lose those 3 units. But on the other hand you have more chances not to lose your 3 units.
WW : 23%
WL/LW : 54%
LL: 23%
Anyway , I don't say that the one is better of the other, there are many variations for those kind of systems. Everybody choses what he prefers.

Richard Meisel

Quote from: huskerdu on May 04, 02:11 PM 2020
Yes, but you have less chances to win and more chances to lose those 3 units. But on the other hand you have more chances not to lose your 3 units.
WW : 23%
WL/LW : 54%
LL: 23%
Anyway , I don't say that the one is better of the other, there are many variations for those kind of systems. Everybody choses what he prefers.
But I believe it is the Loss to Win RATIO that matters.

Richard Meisel

It's hard to find the losing streaks in this Method because every alternate Bet includes a Random Bet.

-