• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

The most simple constant winning bet - A real HG without secrets or guesswork

Started by winkel, Jul 27, 03:51 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Bayes

I've merged winkel's files (linked to above) into a single file (a single column with one spin per line).

There are about 11,300 spins in total but note that in the above files there is a "gap" after day 20, so I have marked that point in the file with a "***" (at spin 8,368) for anyone who wants to keep the spins continuous. So all the spins BEFORE the "***" are in sequential order and continuous, and those AFTER the *** are too, but NOT the spins taken as a whole.

"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

winkel

Hi Bayes,

as I mentionend: Casino was closed on Easter. There is no Gap in the spins!

br
winkel
There is always a game

Bayes

"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Bayes

Ok, please ignore the above link, THIS is the file you need (11,756 continuous spins in sequential order from the same table).

Just a note of caution: Sometimes the optical readers don't work, or the reading could be taken and then the ball may bounce into a neighbouring pocket. I've seen it before - the numbers on the marquee don't always correspond to what actually happened. The only way to be 100% sure is to see with your own eyes.
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain


Compa

Quote from: Bayes on Aug 05, 07:41 AM 2010
Ok, please ignore the above link, THIS is the file you need (11,756 continuous spins in sequential order from the same table).

Just a note of caution: Sometimes the optical readers don't work, or the reading could be taken and then the ball may bounce into a neighbouring pocket. I've seen it before - the numbers on the marquee don't always correspond to what actually happened. The only way to be 100% sure is to see with your own eyes.

Hi. You dont need more than 3000 spins to measure consistency mate;)

Cheers

Bayes

Quote from: Compa on Aug 15, 07:18 AM 2010
Hi. You don't need more than 3000 spins to measure consistency mate;)
Cheers

I disagree, but what does this have to do with the optical readers?

"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Bayes

"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Compa


esoito

For any doubters:

12 million spins attached = confirmation of 600/1000 sleeps

esoito

This method would lend itself very well to a bot.

Roulette Bot PRO Version 3 could be ideal as it is easily configured.

A FREE 3-day trial would confirm -- or reject -- the hypothesis.

Remember:  it's just a TOOL. It will only be as good, or as bad, as the settings you choose.

(And, no. I'm not the author of the software! Just an interested observer.  ;))




esoito

Any progress to report...anyone?

Bayes -- did you manage to do the coding eventually? Or did it fall through the cracks?  ;)


Bayes

No, sorry esoito. I have to admit it wasn't a high priority, but thanks for reminding me, I've put it on the to-do list.
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

GARNabby

Quote from: esoito on Jan 10, 11:40 PM 2011
Any progress to report...anyone?

After a year of "no progress" with anything, it's 100% "nuts" to keep at it.

I'm now 100% certain that no one will ever fairly and truly beat this game in any form by any means.

Done with it, like Lanky... nothing of use even elsewhere, except perhaps for some of mr. ore's posts.

Bayes

As far as I'm aware, Lanky is still winning. I think he was "done with" forums, not playing roulette.
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

-