DS4

[Halba1]

Hello. my version provided is too risky. I tested it and a triple loss was seen.

since yours has no triple loss, probably better.

I also tested yours in comparison, and the results were much much better.

I also tested something good potential

163223         group 1
446254         group 2
535651          group 3

bet for group 3 individual nos, against group 1. i had nearly 100% strike rate. Only one L, no LL or LLL.

[amk]

I think I might understand why DS4 performs well....

We are actually playing a MATRIX VERTICAL...


                 4 5  1    group 1
                 3 1  2    group 2
                 5 6  4    group 3
                 4 3  2
                 3 4  5      this game is a double loss
                 2             this game would be a triple loss


                4
                3
                5
                4
                3
                5

If the first three numbers are the same as the last 3 numbers, it would be the same as...   

                4
                4
                4
                4
                4
                4


A six pointer for a vertical matrix......

Perhaps wishful thinking but perhaps there something to it......

[amk]

Below is what DS4 looks like when played continually.........

It gives us a picture of how HIT AND RUN will perform...

A single "L" is really not a loss as with or two step progression we are up one unit with a win on the very next game.......

1600 spins have been played consecutively, 8 double loses seen and one triple loss........
This triple loss is the only time a significant loss was seen......
A double loss was otherwise always seen to win on 3rd level progression which would have halved our loss to 17 units...........


::::wL::wwL:::wL::wwL:wwL::::::L::wL:::wL::::::wLL:::::wwL:::wL:::::L::wL:wL:wL::::wL::LLwwL::wwL::::wwL::::wL::::wL::L:::wL::L::::LL::::wL::::wL:::::

This pattern is seen throughout the 1600 spins, only one LLL seen......

[Halba1]

hello amk this is a winner. even better than code 4. the strike rate is almost 100%.

[amk]

DS4 units won during 1600 consecutive spins = 533 games:


533 - 136 (8 double losses won on 3rd progression = 17x8) - 120 (triple loss) =  +268 units

[amk]

Any thoughts out there?

[Halba1]

i tried it amk. it is good. only issue is 1 uncovered double street. also have to increase 6x twice, which might be uncomf. for most.

[amk]

Halba1,

How many games did you play?
Using 2nd stage of progression should be expected......
It might be better to wait for a trigger, when the first DS number repeats than start the progression on the next bet.... 

453
253
165
4 . .     trigger = repeat of #4            . . = 2 more spins
..         next bet against #2



This will take a great deal of patience but..... should have tremendous longterm success....
If played in this fashion it would be best to keep track of a trigger while playing other methods....


I am working on a few more variations of play. 

I think this might just be the start of the DS4"s.......

[Halba1]

Halba1,

How many games did you play?
Using 2nd stage of progression should be expected......
It might be better to wait for a trigger, when the first DS number repeats than start the progression on the next bet....  

453
253
165
4 . .     trigger = repeat of #4            . . = 2 more spins
..         next bet against #2



This will take a great deal of patience but..... should have tremendous longterm success....
If played in this fashion it would be best to keep track of a trigger while playing other methods....


I am working on a few more variations of play.  

I think this might just be the start of the DS4"s.......

thanks, I tried it, good results as per your system. it gets +ve units. let me know your variations, and I guess you can post it in the full systems

bet after L is a good way to start.

like you say pattern 4 has limitations esp with ECs, a lot of repeaters(too many for my liking)